This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054449_TTUQ1b1x1_4133459_U7zW9Pem
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
U Gem,2461269.9472,10.14,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
U Gem 20260817.4472 10.14CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 17.4472 2461269.9472 13.95 06:50:41.50 +22:29:01.8
192.63563 9.88673 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.2" and 7.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.171 Ophelia -0 2 2 14.5 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:50:41.50 +22:29:01.8: 15.79 +/- 0.34 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:50:41.50 +22:29:01.8: 15.51 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.61 +/- 0.21
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461269.9472,13.95,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260817.4472 13.95CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 17.4472 2461269.9472 12.99 07:27:32.39 +24:56:07.5
193.81834 18.59293 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 7.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.145 Adeona 1 0 1 13.5 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:27:32.39 +24:56:07.5: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:27:32.39 +24:56:07.5: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461269.9472,12.99,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260817.4472 12.99CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 17.4472 2461269.9472 13.02 07:11:25.14 +17:39:01.2
199.19774 12.24567 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 7.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.202 Chryseis 0 -0 0 13.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:11:25.14 +17:39:01.2: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:11:25.14 +17:39:01.2: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461269.9472,13.02,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260817.4472 13.02CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 17.4472 2461269.9472 13.38 07:26:28.79 +26:28:28.6
192.21513 18.94208 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 7.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.423 Diotima 1 0 1 13.5 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:26:28.79 +26:28:28.6: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:26:28.79 +26:28:28.6: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461269.9472,13.38,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260817.4472 13.38CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 17.4472 2461269.9472 13.60 07:10:22.56 +24:37:12.6
192.55297 14.87693 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 7.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.779 Nina 1 -0 1 13.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:10:22.56 +24:37:12.6: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:10:22.56 +24:37:12.6: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461269.9472,13.60,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260817.4472 13.60CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
U Gem,2461269.9472,10.18,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
U Gem 20260817.4472 10.18CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 17.4472 2461269.9472 12.82 07:12:20.14 +22:24:33.6
194.83280 14.40360 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 7.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.521 Brixia 0 1 1 13.3 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:12:20.14 +22:24:33.6: 15.24 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:12:20.14 +22:24:33.6: 15.35 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.29 +/- 0.12
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461269.9472,12.82,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260817.4472 12.82CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 17.4472 2461269.9472 13.35 06:53:50.66 +24:02:29.5
191.51406 11.20390 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 7.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.579 Sidonia 0 -1 1 14.2 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:53:50.66 +24:02:29.5: 14.68 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:53:50.66 +24:02:29.5: 14.44 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.53 +/- 0.07
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461269.9472,13.35,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260817.4472 13.35CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.68545435 22.02.2026 04:26:53.256 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
First image: 2461093.68545435 22.02.2026 04:26:53.256 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Last image: 2461269.94746883 17.08.2026 10:44:11.307 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054449_TTUQ1b1x1_4133459_U7zW9Pem/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 12
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.64
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 22114
Objects passed selection criteria: 22005
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 16108.8
Average stars matched: 15697.5 (97.447 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 249664 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Aug 17 05:51:11 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.68545435 22.02.2026 04:26:53.256 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
First image: 2461093.68545435 22.02.2026 04:26:53.256 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Last image: 2461269.94746883 17.08.2026 10:44:11.307 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054449_TTUQ1b1x1_4133459_U7zW9Pem/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 188
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.35
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 37 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 140263
Objects passed selection criteria: 139843
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 107108
Average stars matched: 103047 (96.2087 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 605152 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Aug 17 05:52:32 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054449_TTUQ1b1x1_4133459_U7zW9Pem/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-43-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0488.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054449_TTUQ1b1x1_4133459_U7zW9Pem/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054449_TTUQ1b1x1_4133459_U7zW9Pem/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-43-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0488.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054449_TTUQ1b1x1_4133459_U7zW9Pem/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461269.94688855
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-43-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0488.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-43-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0488.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-43-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0488.fits
Image size: 945.3'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:06.764 +22:00:25.40 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41
Second-epoch image center 07:23:06.764 +22:00:25.40
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0134 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489.fits
Image size: 945.2'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:05.453 +22:01:05.89 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41
Second-epoch image center 07:23:05.453 +22:01:05.89
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0195 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:23:06.764 +22:00:25.40
Second-epoch second image center 07:23:05.453 +22:01:05.89
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01234 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nkyqnLNG9u
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9fBKE5HbNm
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054449_TTUQ1b1x1_4133459_U7zW9Pem/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-43-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0488.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Ni4qTfHWhj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054449_TTUQ1b1x1_4133459_U7zW9Pem/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-43-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0488.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054449_TTUQ1b1x1_4133459_U7zW9Pem/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4kNnAYncGo
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054449_TTUQ1b1x1_4133459_U7zW9Pem/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 23656 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0337 to 119.5911 deg, Dec +16.4797 to +27.2941 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0337 to 119.5911 deg, Dec 16.4797 to 27.2941 deg
Loaded 13974 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10666 out of 11758 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11758 out of 23656 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.929600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.929600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.64
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.29
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.29
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 23656 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0337 to 119.5911 deg, Dec +16.4797 to +27.2941 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0337 to 119.5911 deg, Dec 16.4797 to 27.2941 deg
Loaded 13974 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10666 out of 11758 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11758 out of 23656 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 23398 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0336 to 119.5911 deg, Dec +16.4801 to +27.2943 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0336 to 119.5911 deg, Dec 16.4801 to 27.2943 deg
Loaded 13972 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10626 out of 11736 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11736 out of 23398 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 11 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
2.3 pix Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
2.4 pix fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-43-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0488.fits
2.4 pix fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
15.3 mag. Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-43-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0488.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.0 (SNR ) 11.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.nkyqnLNG9u (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054449_TTUQ1b1x1_4133459_U7zW9Pem/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2265, bad_region=1, passed=23656
Got 23656 stars (including 21361 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23656 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4849 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4811 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4812 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4811 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23656 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4849 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4811 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23656 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4811 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23656 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4811 stars left (next iteration limit 5292)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits N_match=4811 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.458 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.409 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.341 n_q1=904 n_q2=1356 n_q3=1059 n_q4=1492 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.183
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.9fBKE5HbNm (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054449_TTUQ1b1x1_4133459_U7zW9Pem/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2268, bad_region=1, passed=23398
Got 23398 stars (including 21095 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23398 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4844 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4805 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4806 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4805 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23398 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4845 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4806 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23398 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4806 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23398 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 4806 stars left (next iteration limit 5285)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits N_match=4806 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.426 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.544 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.428 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.377 n_q1=895 n_q2=1351 n_q3=1061 n_q4=1499 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.279
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Ni4qTfHWhj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054449_TTUQ1b1x1_4133459_U7zW9Pem/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054449_TTUQ1b1x1_4133459_U7zW9Pem/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-43-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0488.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054449_TTUQ1b1x1_4133459_U7zW9Pem/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-43-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0488.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054449_TTUQ1b1x1_4133459_U7zW9Pem/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-43-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0488.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054449_TTUQ1b1x1_4133459_U7zW9Pem/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-43-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0488.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054449_TTUQ1b1x1_4133459_U7zW9Pem/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-43-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0488.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054449_TTUQ1b1x1_4133459_U7zW9Pem/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-43-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0488.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-43-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0488.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-43-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0488.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-43-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0488.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-43-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0488.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-43-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0488.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-43-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0488.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-43-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0488.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054449_TTUQ1b1x1_4133459_U7zW9Pem/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-43-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0488.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-43-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0488.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=483, bad_region=0, passed=8862
Got 8862 stars (including 8372 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-43-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0488.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8862 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013129 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010503 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4845 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4803 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8857 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4845 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4804 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8857 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4804 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8857 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4804 stars left (next iteration limit 5283)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4804 robust_rms=6.584 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=22.925 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4804 robust_rms=0.510 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.734 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4804 robust_rms=0.404 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.559 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4804 robust_rms_before=1.448 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.382 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.404 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.548 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.559
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.548 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-43-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0488.fits N_match=4804 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.515 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.385 n_q1=1621 n_q2=783 n_q3=1591 n_q4=809 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.331
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-43-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0488.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-43-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0488.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054449_TTUQ1b1x1_4133459_U7zW9Pem/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-43-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0488.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-43-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0488.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-43-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0488.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.4kNnAYncGo (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054449_TTUQ1b1x1_4133459_U7zW9Pem/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054449_TTUQ1b1x1_4133459_U7zW9Pem/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054449_TTUQ1b1x1_4133459_U7zW9Pem/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054449_TTUQ1b1x1_4133459_U7zW9Pem/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054449_TTUQ1b1x1_4133459_U7zW9Pem/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054449_TTUQ1b1x1_4133459_U7zW9Pem/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054449_TTUQ1b1x1_4133459_U7zW9Pem/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054449_TTUQ1b1x1_4133459_U7zW9Pem/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=581, bad_region=1, passed=8968
Got 8968 stars (including 8376 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8968 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013128 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010502 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4842 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4797 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4798 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4796 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8963 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4841 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4801 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8963 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4801 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8963 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4801 stars left (next iteration limit 5275)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4801 robust_rms=6.851 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=22.960 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4801 robust_rms=0.573 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.784 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4801 robust_rms=0.412 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.555 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4801 robust_rms_before=1.534 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.382 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.412 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.542 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.555
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.542 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489.fits N_match=4801 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.514 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.382 n_q1=1624 n_q2=797 n_q3=1569 n_q4=811 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.341
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054449_TTUQ1b1x1_4133459_U7zW9Pem/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-43-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0488.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-43-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0488.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-43-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0488.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits sigma_overall=0.387 worst_q_ratio=1.183
ref2=Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits sigma_overall=0.426 worst_q_ratio=1.279
new1=fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-43-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0488.fits sigma_overall=0.387 worst_q_ratio=1.331
new2=fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489.fits sigma_overall=0.383 worst_q_ratio=1.341
reference average sigma_overall=0.4065 worst_q_ratio=1.231
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153_astrometric_residuals.png (4811 matched stars from wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154_astrometric_residuals.png (4806 matched stars from wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-43-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0488_astrometric_residuals.png (4804 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-43-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0488.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489_astrometric_residuals.png (4801 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-43-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0488.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-43-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0488.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054449_TTUQ1b1x1_4133459_U7zW9Pem/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-43-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0488.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054449_TTUQ1b1x1_4133459_U7zW9Pem/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:49.91 +22:56:14.8: 9.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:42.81 +22:54:43.0: 10.03 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:32.40 +23:01:31.1: 11.21 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:09.79 +22:47:45.2: 10.83 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:56:50.63 +20:58:43.0: 10.77 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:35.39 +22:51:40.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:42.81 +22:54:43.0: 10.03 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:56:50.63 +20:58:43.0: 10.78 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:35.39 +22:51:40.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:35.39 +22:51:40.1: the source is saturated (present but too bright to measure) on at least one reference image -- likely a star-matching failure rather than a new transient
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.03 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:49.91 +22:56:14.8: 9.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:32.40 +23:01:31.1: 11.23 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:42.81 +22:54:43.0: ref_mag=10.03 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=10.5571 delta=-0.53 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.78 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:56:50.63 +20:58:43.0: ref_mag=10.78 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.8968 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.22 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:09.79 +22:47:45.2: 10.82 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:32.40 +23:01:31.1: ref_mag=11.22 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.2437 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.82 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:09.79 +22:47:45.2: ref_mag=10.82 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.0925 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out31515.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 3s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31374_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 31374_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31401_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 31401_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:34.07 +25:59:42.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31423_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 31423_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31434_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
Preparing report for the candidate 31434_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31452_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 31452_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31473_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 31473_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31484_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 31484_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31500_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 31500_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:31.05 +20:02:07.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31515_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 31515_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:49.91 +22:56:14.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.40, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.38)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.015 3368422178853349376 106.45795707711 +22.93744054621 11.2237 10.5718 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.015#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31536_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 31536_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:34.37 +24:13:20.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20555_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 20555_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:41.01 +17:29:38.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 4s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054449_TTUQ1b1x1_4133459_U7zW9Pem/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-43-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0488.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054449_TTUQ1b1x1_4133459_U7zW9Pem/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054449_TTUQ1b1x1_4133459_U7zW9Pem/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-43-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0488.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054449_TTUQ1b1x1_4133459_U7zW9Pem/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-43-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0488.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-43-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0488.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-43-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0488.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-43-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0488.fits
Image size: 945.3'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:06.764 +22:00:25.40 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41
Second-epoch image center 07:23:06.764 +22:00:25.40
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0134 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489.fits
Image size: 945.2'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:05.453 +22:01:05.89 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41
Second-epoch image center 07:23:05.453 +22:01:05.89
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0195 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:23:06.764 +22:00:25.40
Second-epoch second image center 07:23:05.453 +22:01:05.89
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01234 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5edAKEnR2j
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4qODiWzsjw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054449_TTUQ1b1x1_4133459_U7zW9Pem/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-43-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0488.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uTVtw689SC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054449_TTUQ1b1x1_4133459_U7zW9Pem/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-43-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0488.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054449_TTUQ1b1x1_4133459_U7zW9Pem/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ScKH9mpx0I
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054449_TTUQ1b1x1_4133459_U7zW9Pem/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 151496 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0323 to 119.6245 deg, Dec +16.4740 to +27.2968 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0323 to 119.6245 deg, Dec 16.4740 to 27.2968 deg
Loaded 14006 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8794 out of 12008 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12008 out of 151496 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.796750
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.796750
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.35
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 151496 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0323 to 119.6245 deg, Dec +16.4740 to +27.2968 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0323 to 119.6245 deg, Dec 16.4740 to 27.2968 deg
Loaded 14006 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8794 out of 12008 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12008 out of 151496 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (aperture=4.8)
Read 153605 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0325 to 119.6247 deg, Dec +16.4748 to +27.3045 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0325 to 119.6247 deg, Dec 16.4748 to 27.3045 deg
Loaded 14009 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8793 out of 12010 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12010 out of 153605 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits (aperture=4.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 182 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
2.1 pix Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
2.4 pix fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-43-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0488.fits
2.4 pix fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
15.4 mag. Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-43-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0488.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.0 (SNR ) 13.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.5edAKEnR2j (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054449_TTUQ1b1x1_4133459_U7zW9Pem/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=46, blended=17705, bad_region=3, passed=151450
Got 151450 stars (including 133484 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 151450 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4826 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4804 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 151450 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4826 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4804 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 151450 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4804 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 151450 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4804 stars left (next iteration limit 5283)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits N_match=4804 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.439 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.333 n_q1=951 n_q2=1322 n_q3=1097 n_q4=1434 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.231
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.4qODiWzsjw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054449_TTUQ1b1x1_4133459_U7zW9Pem/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=67, blended=17785, bad_region=5, passed=153538
Got 153538 stars (including 135488 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 153538 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4823 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4802 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4803 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4802 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 153538 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4823 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 153538 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 153538 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 4803 stars left (next iteration limit 5282)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits N_match=4803 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.508 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.411 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.371 n_q1=940 n_q2=1323 n_q3=1093 n_q4=1447 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.259
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.uTVtw689SC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054449_TTUQ1b1x1_4133459_U7zW9Pem/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054449_TTUQ1b1x1_4133459_U7zW9Pem/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-43-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0488.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054449_TTUQ1b1x1_4133459_U7zW9Pem/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-43-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0488.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054449_TTUQ1b1x1_4133459_U7zW9Pem/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-43-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0488.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054449_TTUQ1b1x1_4133459_U7zW9Pem/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-43-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0488.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054449_TTUQ1b1x1_4133459_U7zW9Pem/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-43-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0488.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054449_TTUQ1b1x1_4133459_U7zW9Pem/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-43-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0488.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-43-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0488.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-43-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0488.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-43-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0488.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-43-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0488.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-43-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0488.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-43-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0488.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-43-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0488.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054449_TTUQ1b1x1_4133459_U7zW9Pem/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-43-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0488.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-43-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0488.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=3206, bad_region=23, passed=62947
Got 62947 stars (including 59607 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-43-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0488.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 62947 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013129 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010503 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4834 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4794 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4795 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4794 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62933 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4834 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4793 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62933 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4793 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62933 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4793 stars left (next iteration limit 5273)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-43-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0488.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4793 robust_rms=6.766 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=21.650 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4793 robust_rms=0.511 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.748 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4793 robust_rms=0.396 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.524 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4793 robust_rms_before=1.452 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.370 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.396 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.506 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.524
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.506 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-43-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0488.fits N_match=4793 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.498 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.375 n_q1=1572 n_q2=798 n_q3=1587 n_q4=836 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.363
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-43-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0488.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-43-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0488.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054449_TTUQ1b1x1_4133459_U7zW9Pem/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-43-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0488.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-43-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0488.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-43-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0488.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ScKH9mpx0I (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054449_TTUQ1b1x1_4133459_U7zW9Pem/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054449_TTUQ1b1x1_4133459_U7zW9Pem/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054449_TTUQ1b1x1_4133459_U7zW9Pem/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054449_TTUQ1b1x1_4133459_U7zW9Pem/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054449_TTUQ1b1x1_4133459_U7zW9Pem/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054449_TTUQ1b1x1_4133459_U7zW9Pem/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054449_TTUQ1b1x1_4133459_U7zW9Pem/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054449_TTUQ1b1x1_4133459_U7zW9Pem/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=2, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=3305, bad_region=28, passed=63455
Got 63455 stars (including 60012 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 63455 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013128 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010502 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4832 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4793 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 63444 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4833 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 63444 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 63444 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4791 stars left (next iteration limit 5270)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4791 robust_rms=6.985 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=20.448 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4791 robust_rms=0.569 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.797 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4791 robust_rms=0.406 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.563 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4791 robust_rms_before=1.539 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.373 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.406 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.509 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.563
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.509 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489.fits N_match=4791 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.502 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.386 n_q1=1567 n_q2=806 n_q3=1587 n_q4=831 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.343
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054449_TTUQ1b1x1_4133459_U7zW9Pem/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-43-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0488.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054449_TTUQ1b1x1_4133459_U7zW9Pem/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-43-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0488.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054449_TTUQ1b1x1_4133459_U7zW9Pem/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:50:01.90 +20:15:45.8: 13.80 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:39:50.87 +23:17:25.4: 13.12 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:50:41.50 +22:29:01.8: 15.79 +/- 0.34 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:08:42.10 +19:46:33.0: 13.94 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:59:06.25 +24:26:55.8: 13.54 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:33:02.58 +24:06:45.7: 13.95 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:07:25.93 +20:54:37.6: 13.30 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:08:42.10 +19:46:33.0: 13.85 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:39:50.87 +23:17:25.4: 13.12 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:59:06.25 +24:26:55.8: 13.63 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:33:02.58 +24:06:45.7: 13.98 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:50:01.90 +20:15:45.8: 13.83 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.89 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.59 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.12 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:08:42.10 +19:46:33.0: ref_mag=13.89 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4628 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:50:41.50 +22:29:01.8: 15.51 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:39:50.87 +23:17:25.4: ref_mag=13.12 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1970 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:59:06.25 +24:26:55.8: ref_mag=13.59 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7056 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:33:02.58 +24:06:45.7: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5876 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:50:01.90 +20:15:45.8: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.7643 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.61 +/- 0.21
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:50:41.50 +22:29:01.8: ref_mag=15.61 +/- 0.21 new_mean_mag=13.9447 delta=1.67 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:57:48.93 +23:58:07.6: 13.27 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:53:48.66 +23:16:21.3: 12.79 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:07:25.93 +20:54:37.6: 13.26 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.28 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:07:25.93 +20:54:37.6: ref_mag=13.28 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1922 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:57:48.93 +23:58:07.6: 13.26 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:53:48.66 +23:16:21.3: 12.81 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.27 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:57:48.93 +23:58:07.6: ref_mag=13.27 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2891 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.80 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:53:48.66 +23:16:21.3: ref_mag=12.80 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4341 delta=-0.64 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:56:48.80 +21:43:41.8: 13.29 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:04:04.72 +19:49:25.7: 12.94 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:04:23.70 +17:38:14.3: 12.06 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:56:48.80 +21:43:41.8: 13.44 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:04:04.72 +19:49:25.7: 12.90 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:01.25 +19:41:48.1: 12.54 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.35 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.92 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:56:48.80 +21:43:41.8: ref_mag=13.35 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2851 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:04:04.72 +19:49:25.7: ref_mag=12.92 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9979 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:07:30.01 +27:10:50.6: 12.67 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:04:23.70 +17:38:14.3: 11.93 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.98 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:04:23.70 +17:38:14.3: ref_mag=11.98 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7689 delta=-0.79 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:01.25 +19:41:48.1: 12.52 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.53 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:01.25 +19:41:48.1: ref_mag=12.53 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5180 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:07:30.01 +27:10:50.6: 12.73 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:08:22.16 +21:39:04.0: 11.07 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.70 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:07:30.01 +27:10:50.6: ref_mag=12.70 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7226 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:49.92 +22:56:14.8: 10.40 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:13.83 +22:54:53.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:08:22.16 +21:39:04.0: 11.09 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.08 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:08:22.16 +21:39:04.0: ref_mag=11.08 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.3239 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:49.92 +22:56:14.8: 10.41 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.41 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:49.92 +22:56:14.8: ref_mag=10.41 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=11.3961 delta=-0.99 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:13.83 +22:54:53.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:13.83 +22:54:53.3: the source is saturated (present but too bright to measure) on at least one reference image -- likely a star-matching failure rather than a new transient
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:57:57.54 +22:31:30.2: 12.16 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:54.83 +22:50:50.8: 10.72 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:11:27.17 +26:25:33.8: 12.56 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:57:57.54 +22:31:30.2: 12.21 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.18 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:57:57.54 +22:31:30.2: ref_mag=12.18 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3087 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:54.83 +22:50:50.8: 10.74 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:11:27.17 +26:25:33.8: 12.55 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.73 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:54.83 +22:50:50.8: ref_mag=10.73 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=12.4522 delta=-1.72 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.56 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:11:27.17 +26:25:33.8: ref_mag=12.56 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4751 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:20:35.03 +19:24:26.4: 12.59 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:20:35.03 +19:24:26.4: 12.54 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.56 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:20:35.03 +19:24:26.4: ref_mag=12.56 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4233 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:54:23.01 +21:10:54.6: 12.84 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:01:37.37 +21:43:08.2: 13.09 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:54:23.01 +21:10:54.6: 12.81 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.82 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:54:23.01 +21:10:54.6: ref_mag=12.82 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9455 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:59:35.37 +25:22:46.1: 13.11 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:01:37.37 +21:43:08.2: 13.08 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.08 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:01:37.37 +21:43:08.2: ref_mag=13.08 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0042 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:59:35.37 +25:22:46.1: 13.16 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:27:32.39 +24:56:07.5: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.13 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:59:35.37 +25:22:46.1: ref_mag=13.13 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1783 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:24.66 +22:49:53.5: 12.73 +/- 0.35 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:24.66 +22:49:53.5: 12.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:27:32.39 +24:56:07.5: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.73 +/- 0.35
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:24.66 +22:49:53.5: ref_mag=12.73 +/- 0.35 new_mean_mag=13.1215 delta=-0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:29:20.44 +24:26:15.2: 13.20 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:11:25.14 +17:39:01.2: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:29:20.44 +24:26:15.2: 13.20 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.20 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:29:20.44 +24:26:15.2: ref_mag=13.20 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0139 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:11:25.14 +17:39:01.2: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:53:42.25 +20:44:45.6: 13.39 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:29.33 +22:51:11.3: 13.66 +/- 0.35 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:53:52.21 +23:32:19.7: 13.43 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:53:42.25 +20:44:45.6: 13.40 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.39 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:53:42.25 +20:44:45.6: ref_mag=13.39 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4222 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:39.55 +22:49:42.4: 12.84 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:20:28.85 +26:43:35.5: 13.65 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:29.33 +22:51:11.3: 13.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.66 +/- 0.35
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:29.33 +22:51:11.3: ref_mag=13.66 +/- 0.35 new_mean_mag=13.3601 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:53:52.21 +23:32:19.7: 13.43 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.43 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:53:52.21 +23:32:19.7: ref_mag=13.43 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4967 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:08:37.87 +20:47:59.0: 13.61 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:39.55 +22:49:42.4: 12.92 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.88 +/- 0.19
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:39.55 +22:49:42.4: ref_mag=12.88 +/- 0.19 new_mean_mag=13.3239 delta=-0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:20:28.85 +26:43:35.5: 13.70 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:20:28.85 +26:43:35.5: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4931 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:08:37.87 +20:47:59.0: 13.58 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:26:28.79 +26:28:28.6: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.59 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:08:37.87 +20:47:59.0: ref_mag=13.59 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2720 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:41.33 +22:55:55.6: 13.57 +/- 0.34 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:26:28.79 +26:28:28.6: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:41.33 +22:55:55.6: 13.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.34
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:41.33 +22:55:55.6: ref_mag=13.57 +/- 0.34 new_mean_mag=13.5694 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:10:22.56 +24:37:12.6: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:10:22.56 +24:37:12.6: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:15:38.07 +19:51:29.0: 14.02 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:08.40 +22:46:26.6: 13.52 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:00.67 +23:01:53.7: 13.03 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:15:38.07 +19:51:29.0: 13.96 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.99 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:15:38.07 +19:51:29.0: ref_mag=13.99 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6477 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:34.97 +22:52:01.2: 13.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:08.40 +22:46:26.6: 13.60 +/- 0.33 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.33
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:08.40 +22:46:26.6: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.33 new_mean_mag=13.9465 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:00.67 +23:01:53.7: 12.97 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.99 +/- 0.19
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:00.67 +23:01:53.7: ref_mag=12.99 +/- 0.19 new_mean_mag=14.0016 delta=-1.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:34.97 +22:52:01.2: 13.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:12:20.14 +22:24:33.6: 15.24 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:53:50.66 +24:02:29.5: 14.68 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:12:20.14 +22:24:33.6: 15.35 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.29 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:12:20.14 +22:24:33.6: ref_mag=15.29 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=12.8183 delta=2.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:53:50.66 +24:02:29.5: 14.44 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.53 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:53:50.66 +24:02:29.5: ref_mag=14.53 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.3263 delta=1.20 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out177244.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out175444.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out176542.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out176704.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out176906.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out177063.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out40284.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out64874.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 11s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 6s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175437_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 175437_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:22.29 +21:13:56.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175442_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 175442_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175443_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 175443_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175444_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
Preparing report for the candidate 175444_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175446_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 175446_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175447_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 175447_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175448_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 175448_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:25.82 +23:21:18.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175450_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 175450_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:34.72 +20:54:45.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175451_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 175451_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175453_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 175453_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:24.47 +20:04:49.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175459_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 175459_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:50.80 +21:39:14.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175460_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 175460_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:49.33 +19:58:20.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175462_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 175462_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175464_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 175464_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:33.13 +18:47:50.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175465_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 175465_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:37.30 +18:47:20.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175474_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 175474_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175475_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 175475_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175479_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 175479_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:42.95 +23:17:59.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175481_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 175481_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:54:38.49 +18:11:19.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175483_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 175483_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:50:42.02 +18:34:28.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175484_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 175484_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:25.13 +20:17:00.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175485_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 175485_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:44.60 +20:07:51.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175489_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 175489_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:56.59 +22:46:43.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175491_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 175491_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:52:56.09 +18:43:32.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175493_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 175493_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175494_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 175494_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:32.91 +22:54:44.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175500_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 175500_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:33.31 +17:36:19.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175504_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 175504_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:14.91 +18:59:01.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175506_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 175506_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:41.01 +21:56:37.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175508_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 175508_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175510_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 175510_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:25.04 +24:28:01.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175511_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 175511_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:51.38 +18:23:12.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175512_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 175512_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175514_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 175514_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:55.73 +26:11:00.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175515_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 175515_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:12.90 +20:54:00.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175516_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 175516_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:12.84 +21:35:35.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175520_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 175520_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:28.50 +21:02:37.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175521_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 175521_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:54:53.95 +20:45:42.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175524_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 175524_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:13.15 +18:03:50.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175526_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 175526_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:50:31.13 +20:09:48.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175528_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 175528_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:06.87 +20:04:17.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175529_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 175529_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175530_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 175530_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:17.20 +19:25:34.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175531_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 175531_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:11.54 +22:11:12.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175533_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 175533_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:54:05.16 +19:40:01.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175534_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 175534_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175538_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 175538_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:19.19 +22:46:53.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175540_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 175540_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:27.79 +19:32:33.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175541_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 175541_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:23.10 +22:16:49.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175542_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 175542_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:38.67 +19:12:52.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175545_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 175545_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:49.34 +26:56:48.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175547_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 175547_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:59.66 +26:50:35.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175548_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 175548_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175697_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 175697_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175726_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 175726_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:04.57 +22:51:50.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175800_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 175800_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175802_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 175802_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:49.35 +19:28:18.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175804_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 175804_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:12.56 +22:52:40.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175809_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 175809_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:19.22 +24:07:15.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175839_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 175839_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:25.15 +22:38:50.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175863_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 175863_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:57.38 +22:56:37.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175890_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 175890_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175932_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 175932_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:40.92 +19:13:20.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175934_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 175934_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:54:52.15 +26:07:15.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175939_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 175939_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:43:57.70 +25:46:40.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175961_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 175961_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:10.64 +22:27:21.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176014_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 176014_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176017_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 176017_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176050_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 176050_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:32.95 +22:42:06.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176070_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 176070_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:53.88 +20:58:50.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176090_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 176090_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:48.13 +17:59:36.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176091_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 176091_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:25.36 +25:56:20.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176101_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 176101_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:41:02.92 +23:03:00.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176108_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 176108_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:22.80 +25:23:47.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176110_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 176110_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:54.13 +23:37:28.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176111_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 176111_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:40.84 +22:57:36.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176117_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 176117_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:02.89 +23:25:47.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176118_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 176118_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:37.33 +26:03:26.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176128_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 176128_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176153_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 176153_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:08.05 +21:35:22.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176158_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 176158_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:19.06 +25:55:36.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176159_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 176159_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:36:01.19 +26:51:14.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176160_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 176160_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:48.36 +24:16:05.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176170_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 176170_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:46:14.92 +18:30:22.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176174_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 176174_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:06.48 +18:39:20.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176187_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 176187_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:49.60 +25:29:29.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176189_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 176189_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:20.50 +26:22:28.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176206_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 176206_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:42.16 +22:10:16.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176223_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 176223_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:37.03 +17:45:36.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176242_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 176242_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:43:14.42 +22:23:11.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176249_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 176249_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:23.12 +22:43:57.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176277_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 176277_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:42.48 +21:18:41.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176281_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 176281_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:46.87 +22:42:07.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176305_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 176305_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176330_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 176330_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:45.87 +23:26:51.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176339_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 176339_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:45.84 +25:33:05.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176344_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 176344_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176366_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 176366_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:15.35 +21:47:41.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176367_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 176367_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:50.82 +18:51:17.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176372_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 176372_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:10.17 +22:52:12.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176408_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 176408_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:00.14 +22:57:32.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176431_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 176431_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:19.36 +22:04:39.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176432_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 176432_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:52:20.51 +26:19:11.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176434_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 176434_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:50:42.81 +23:41:34.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176437_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 176437_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176446_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 176446_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:54:21.43 +23:00:01.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176454_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 176454_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:43.84 +22:49:12.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176467_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 176467_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:22.40 +20:30:18.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176471_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 176471_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:08.44 +25:49:50.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176486_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 176486_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:13.67 +24:40:50.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176530_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 176530_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:32:08.76 +23:56:53.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176542_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
Preparing report for the candidate 176542_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176554_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 176554_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:27.66 +22:58:42.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176558_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 176558_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176562_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 176562_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:54.29 +24:32:03.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176603_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 176603_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:48.04 +21:45:36.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176605_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 176605_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:49.69 +26:19:04.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176638_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 176638_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:31.62 +24:54:41.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176656_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 176656_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:11.09 +24:39:05.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176669_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 176669_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:36.68 +19:19:51.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176671_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 176671_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:23.41 +18:07:02.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176695_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 176695_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176696_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 176696_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:49.04 +25:18:26.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176700_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 176700_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:55.40 +20:35:45.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176704_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
Preparing report for the candidate 176704_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176717_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 176717_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:22.10 +23:05:07.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176755_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 176755_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:26.09 +22:50:05.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176757_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 176757_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:03.46 +19:28:25.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176764_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 176764_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:46:57.02 +26:00:40.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176772_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 176772_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:17.00 +26:36:59.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176774_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 176774_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:31.11 +19:14:45.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176779_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 176779_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:06.74 +21:00:16.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176780_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 176780_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176786_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 176786_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:35:49.50 +24:54:14.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176793_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 176793_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:18:50.51 +25:56:35.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176799_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 176799_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:33.11 +23:13:22.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176802_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 176802_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:40.63 +20:31:57.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176825_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 176825_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:55.39 +21:31:08.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176827_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 176827_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176828_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 176828_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176840_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 176840_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:20.18 +24:08:05.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176858_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 176858_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176859_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 176859_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:41.50 +19:34:18.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176861_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 176861_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176862_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 176862_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176878_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 176878_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:43.15 +22:57:51.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176903_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 176903_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:10.96 +20:06:30.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176906_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
Preparing report for the candidate 176906_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176919_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 176919_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:22:30.22 +22:57:31.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176985_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 176985_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:01.68 +21:27:58.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177002_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 177002_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177009_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 177009_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:11.17 +22:51:42.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177023_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 177023_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:17.10 +22:39:54.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177027_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 177027_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:02.64 +19:56:34.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177033_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 177033_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:30.44 +20:05:39.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177044_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 177044_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:01.04 +20:08:01.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177063_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
Preparing report for the candidate 177063_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177065_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 177065_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:18.96 +22:52:12.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177091_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 177091_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:49.59 +23:02:58.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177101_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 177101_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:52:25.24 +18:36:18.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177118_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 177118_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:22.66 +20:00:48.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177152_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 177152_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:44.05 +20:44:39.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177154_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 177154_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:49.80 +22:50:39.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177169_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 177169_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177180_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 177180_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:59.34 +22:48:11.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177210_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 177210_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:24.70 +22:51:03.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177219_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 177219_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177226_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 177226_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177232_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 177232_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:30.74 +22:58:33.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177244_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 177244_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:34.97 +22:52:01.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.99, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.97)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.879 3368232345595146368 106.39552780762 +22.86717876465 14.0878 13.6038 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.879#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177245_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 177245_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:33.82 +24:10:39.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120103_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 120103_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:29:21.42 +18:06:05.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168492_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 168492_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (44.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05956_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 05956_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:12.43 +26:47:36.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15633_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 15633_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:34.07 +25:59:42.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163920_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 163920_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:34.44 +24:13:20.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66489_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
Preparing report for the candidate 66489_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64874_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
Preparing report for the candidate 64874_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100568_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 100568_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:31.09 +20:02:07.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 40284_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
Preparing report for the candidate 40284_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111481_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 111481_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:41.02 +17:29:39.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126593_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489
The candidate 126593_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-44-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0489 did not pass the final checks
