NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields Eri-04-Q1b1x1

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 08 17.41744    2461269.91744    13.25    04:01:04.46 -06:56:15.7   2258 4932   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.41798    2461269.91798    13.31    04:01:04.54 -06:56:15.9   2259 4928   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 08 17.4177  2461269.9177  13.28  04:01:04.50 -06:56:15.8
197.71218 -40.76620 galactic  Eri  Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 4.7 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
183 Istria                  -0     -1       1  13.2     0   -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits at 04:01:04.50 -06:56:15.8:  15.93 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-28-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 04:01:04.50 -06:56:15.8:  15.82 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Eri-04-Q1b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 1

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field Eri-04-Q1b1x1 reference image: Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits
Field Eri-04-Q1b1x1 reference image: Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-28-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Field Eri-04-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
Field Eri-04-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Eri-04-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Eri-04-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Eri-04-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 584204 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 584204 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-28-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.png' -> 'transient_report/Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits_preview.png'
Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits

renamed 'Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.png' -> 'transient_report/Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits_preview.png'
Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 840.8246 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 595.5746 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2031.5577 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 620.2332 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2025.0279 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 620.4110 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.41615 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.000 INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 23.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 20.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-17T05:00:57.1289904' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-17T10:00:57.1289904' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61269.4173278701 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-17T10:01:07.0345854' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61269.4174425229 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 64.2852210579893 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = -9.99969708539255 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 25.2055555555556 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 122.936388888889 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.33791149237455 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Eri-04' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '04 17 09' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-10 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29515 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29515 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 23.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 23.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 10.8 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 53.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 906.5 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 20.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 245.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 9.400752 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 5.400432 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/d_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits :) Spent 0.526831 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/d_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 22.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 20.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-17T05:01:43.2033106' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-17T10:01:43.2033106' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61269.4178611459 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-17T10:01:53.1061171' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61269.4179757638 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 64.2852210009117 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = -9.99969709604255 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 25.3397222222222 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 123.084166666667 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.32647066074703 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Eri-04' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '04 17 09' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-10 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29515 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29515 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 22.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 22.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 10.8 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 53.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 906.5 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 20.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 245.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 9.400752 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 5.400432 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/d_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits :) Spent 0.503189 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/d_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits


fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-28-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-28-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-28-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461269.91744361 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-28-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits Image size: 941.5'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 04:17:05.205 -10:00:59.85 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits Image size: 941.9'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 04:17:16.630 -10:04:28.15 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 04:17:05.205 -10:00:59.85 Second-epoch image center 04:17:16.630 -10:04:28.15 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0745 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits Image size: 941.9'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 04:17:16.163 -10:04:01.48 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 04:17:05.205 -10:00:59.85 Second-epoch image center 04:17:16.163 -10:04:01.48 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0676 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 04:17:16.630 -10:04:28.15 Second-epoch second image center 04:17:16.163 -10:04:01.48 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00765 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits &> /tmp/tmp.sZDYLp1qFW Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-28-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3qWnQAVl4C Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-28-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits &> /tmp/tmp.A9oH7St3lk Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits &> /tmp/tmp.V02742KxaC Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits and wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits and wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits and wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits) and catalog (wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 8399 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 56.2602 to 72.4744 deg, Dec -15.3297 to -4.5820 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 56.2602 to 72.4744 deg, Dec -15.3297 to -4.5820 deg Loaded 6224 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4925 out of 5198 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5198 out of 8399 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.919600 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.919600 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.73 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.19 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.19
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 8399 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 56.2602 to 72.4744 deg, Dec -15.3297 to -4.5820 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 56.2602 to 72.4744 deg, Dec -15.3297 to -4.5820 deg Loaded 6224 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4925 out of 5198 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5198 out of 8399 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits (aperture=5.9) Read 7979 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 56.2680 to 72.4743 deg, Dec -15.3053 to -4.5663 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 56.2680 to 72.4743 deg, Dec -15.3053 to -4.5663 deg Loaded 6211 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4898 out of 5142 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5142 out of 7979 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-28-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-28-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-28-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-28-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-28-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits (aperture=6.2) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.0 pix Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits 2.1 pix Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-28-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits 2.4 pix fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits 2.4 pix fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.2 mag. Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits 15.1 mag. Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-28-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits 14.3 mag. fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits 14.3 mag. fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.3 (SNR ) 11.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory ############ /tmp/tmp.sZDYLp1qFW (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits' -> 'wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=669, bad_region=0, passed=8399 Got 8399 stars (including 7713 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8399 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4907 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.22" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8399 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.22" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8399 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.22" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8399 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23" Excluding outliers - 4907 stars left (next iteration limit 5397) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits N_match=4907 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.249 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.248 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.218 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.213 n_q1=1353 n_q2=1145 n_q3=1236 n_q4=1173 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.288 The image catalog is written to wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits -region wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.3qWnQAVl4C (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-28-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-28-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-28-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-28-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-28-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-28-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-28-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits' -> 'wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-28-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-28-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-28-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-28-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-28-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-28-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-28-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-28-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-28-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-28-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-28-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=615, bad_region=0, passed=7979 Got 7979 stars (including 7347 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-28-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7979 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4906 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4902 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7979 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4906 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7979 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7979 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" Excluding outliers - 4902 stars left (next iteration limit 5392) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-28-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-28-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits N_match=4902 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.276 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.285 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.239 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.227 n_q1=1361 n_q2=1148 n_q3=1230 n_q4=1163 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.331 The image catalog is written to wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-28-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-28-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-28-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits -region wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-28-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-28-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.A9oH7St3lk (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=332, bad_region=0, passed=4842 Got 4842 stars (including 4505 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4842 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4418 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4413 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4413 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4413 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4842 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4420 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4414 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4842 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4414 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4842 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Excluding outliers - 4414 stars left (next iteration limit 4854) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4414 robust_rms=10.508 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.634 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4414 robust_rms=0.486 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.525 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4414 robust_rms=0.352 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.425 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4414 robust_rms_before=0.839 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.290 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.352 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.338 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.425 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.338 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits N_match=4414 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.298 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.278 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.281 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.289 n_q1=1068 n_q2=1064 n_q3=1059 n_q4=1223 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.136 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits -region wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.V02742KxaC (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=322, bad_region=0, passed=4879 Got 4879 stars (including 4550 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4879 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4459 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4452 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4452 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4452 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4879 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4459 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4451 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4879 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4451 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4879 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Excluding outliers - 4451 stars left (next iteration limit 4897) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4451 robust_rms=10.356 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.466 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4451 robust_rms=0.415 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.428 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4451 robust_rms=0.335 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.407 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4451 robust_rms_before=0.798 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.288 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.335 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.324 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.407 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.324 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits N_match=4451 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.297 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.289 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.273 n_q1=1051 n_q2=1079 n_q3=1083 n_q4=1238 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.161 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits -region wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-28-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-28-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-28-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits' ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits sigma_overall=0.249 worst_q_ratio=1.288 ref2=Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-28-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits sigma_overall=0.276 worst_q_ratio=1.331 new1=fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits sigma_overall=0.298 worst_q_ratio=1.136 new2=fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits sigma_overall=0.297 worst_q_ratio=1.161 reference average sigma_overall=0.2625 worst_q_ratio=1.3095 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233_astrometric_residuals.png (4907 matched stars from wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.22 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-28-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154_astrometric_residuals.png (4902 matched stars from wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-28-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452_astrometric_residuals.png (4414 matched stars from wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453_astrometric_residuals.png (4451 matched stars from wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Eri-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 No candidates found here Prepared the HTML report for the field Eri-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-28-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-28-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-28-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-28-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-28-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits Image size: 941.5'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 04:17:05.205 -10:00:59.85 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits Image size: 941.9'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 04:17:16.630 -10:04:28.15 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 04:17:05.205 -10:00:59.85 Second-epoch image center 04:17:16.630 -10:04:28.15 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0745 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits Image size: 941.9'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 04:17:16.163 -10:04:01.48 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 04:17:05.205 -10:00:59.85 Second-epoch image center 04:17:16.163 -10:04:01.48 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0676 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 04:17:16.630 -10:04:28.15 Second-epoch second image center 04:17:16.163 -10:04:01.48 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00765 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2vh1OsPUmF Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-28-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits &> /tmp/tmp.GO9Z4rlwUu Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-28-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UqrjCrFQYk Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7wgRkyYcPs Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits and wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits and wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits and wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits) and catalog (wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 47769 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 56.2549 to 72.4770 deg, Dec -15.3406 to -4.5507 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 56.2549 to 72.4770 deg, Dec -15.3406 to -4.5507 deg Loaded 6245 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4738 out of 5344 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5344 out of 47769 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.816650 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.816650 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.48 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.34 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.34
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 47769 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 56.2549 to 72.4770 deg, Dec -15.3406 to -4.5507 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 56.2549 to 72.4770 deg, Dec -15.3406 to -4.5507 deg Loaded 6245 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4738 out of 5344 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5344 out of 47769 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits (aperture=4.7) Read 45219 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 56.2616 to 72.5117 deg, Dec -15.3230 to -4.5410 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 56.2616 to 72.5117 deg, Dec -15.3230 to -4.5410 deg Loaded 6253 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4754 out of 5349 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5349 out of 45219 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-28-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-28-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-28-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-28-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-28-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits (aperture=4.9) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 98 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 1.9 pix Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits 2.0 pix Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-28-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits 2.3 pix fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits 2.3 pix fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.3 mag. Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits 15.2 mag. Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-28-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits 14.4 mag. fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits 14.4 mag. fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 13.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.2vh1OsPUmF (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits' -> 'wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=2386, bad_region=4, passed=47753 Got 47753 stars (including 45278 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 47753 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4922 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4920 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.22" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 47753 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.22" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4922 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 47753 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.22" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 47753 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23" Excluding outliers - 4920 stars left (next iteration limit 5412) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits N_match=4920 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.240 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.242 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.213 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.211 n_q1=1353 n_q2=1144 n_q3=1236 n_q4=1187 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.269 The image catalog is written to wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits -region wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.GO9Z4rlwUu (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-28-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-28-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-28-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-28-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-28-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-28-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-28-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits' -> 'wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-28-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-28-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-28-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-28-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-28-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-28-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-28-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-28-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-28-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-28-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-28-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=2370, bad_region=2, passed=45198 Got 45198 stars (including 42730 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-28-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 45198 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4915 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4913 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45198 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4915 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45198 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45198 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" Excluding outliers - 4913 stars left (next iteration limit 5404) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-28-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-28-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-28-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits N_match=4913 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.265 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.272 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.232 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.226 n_q1=1355 n_q2=1145 n_q3=1222 n_q4=1191 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.282 The image catalog is written to wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-28-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-28-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-28-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits -region wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-28-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-28-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.UqrjCrFQYk (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=987, bad_region=22, passed=28684 Got 28684 stars (including 27632 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 28684 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4910 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4907 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28684 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4910 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28684 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28684 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Excluding outliers - 4907 stars left (next iteration limit 5397) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4907 robust_rms=9.980 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.561 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4907 robust_rms=0.488 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.545 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4907 robust_rms=0.353 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.425 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4907 robust_rms_before=0.831 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.285 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.353 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.335 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.425 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.335 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits N_match=4907 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.293 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.287 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.278 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.283 n_q1=1212 n_q2=1120 n_q3=1224 n_q4=1351 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.127 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits -region wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.7wgRkyYcPs (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=957, bad_region=23, passed=28876 Got 28876 stars (including 27852 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 28876 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4909 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28876 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4914 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28876 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28876 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Excluding outliers - 4910 stars left (next iteration limit 5399) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4910 robust_rms=9.810 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.253 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4910 robust_rms=0.418 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.432 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4910 robust_rms=0.337 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.403 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4910 robust_rms_before=0.783 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.290 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.337 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.327 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.403 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.327 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits N_match=4910 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.301 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.294 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.292 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.280 n_q1=1206 n_q2=1120 n_q3=1216 n_q4=1368 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.135 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits -region wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Eri-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits at 04:00:53.93 -10:27:10.5: 10.10 +/- 0.00 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits at 04:28:06.63 -11:59:08.4: 12.63 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-28-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 04:00:53.93 -10:27:10.5: 10.04 +/- 0.00 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.07 +/- 0.00 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:00:53.93 -10:27:10.5: ref_mag=10.07 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.5995 delta=-0.53 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits at 04:01:04.50 -06:56:15.8: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits at 04:25:34.89 -05:13:50.1: 13.28 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-28-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 04:28:06.63 -11:59:08.4: 12.60 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.62 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:28:06.63 -11:59:08.4: ref_mag=12.62 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6579 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits at 03:59:35.09 -12:24:06.2: 13.39 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-28-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 04:01:04.50 -06:56:15.8: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits at 04:04:42.61 -06:45:17.8: 13.43 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-28-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 04:25:34.89 -05:13:50.1: 13.25 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.27 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:25:34.89 -05:13:50.1: ref_mag=13.27 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1879 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-28-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 03:59:35.09 -12:24:06.2: 13.27 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:59:35.09 -12:24:06.2: ref_mag=13.33 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3126 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits at 04:30:15.67 -11:34:53.5: 13.38 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits at 04:04:28.13 -10:13:01.0: 13.66 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-28-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 04:04:42.61 -06:45:17.8: 13.31 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.37 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:04:42.61 -06:45:17.8: ref_mag=13.37 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3303 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits at 04:10:21.23 -09:20:02.0: 13.71 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits at 04:16:36.98 -12:31:24.7: 13.50 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-28-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 04:30:15.67 -11:34:53.5: 13.43 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:30:15.67 -11:34:53.5: ref_mag=13.40 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4076 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-28-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 04:04:28.13 -10:13:01.0: 13.68 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:04:28.13 -10:13:01.0: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6077 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-28-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 04:10:21.23 -09:20:02.0: 13.71 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:10:21.23 -09:20:02.0: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7087 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-28-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 04:16:36.98 -12:31:24.7: 13.42 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:16:36.98 -12:31:24.7: ref_mag=13.46 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6264 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits at 04:35:11.70 -12:57:43.0: 13.23 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-21-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0233.fits at 04:16:41.44 -07:17:50.5: 13.68 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-28-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 04:35:11.70 -12:57:43.0: 13.21 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.22 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:35:11.70 -12:57:43.0: ref_mag=13.22 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2734 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-28-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 04:16:41.44 -07:17:50.5: 13.60 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:16:41.44 -07:17:50.5: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6883 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90) Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52763.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52272_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 The candidate 52272_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.41798    2461269.91798    14.20    03:59:17.00 -09:00:09.1   2079 3664   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52279_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 The candidate 52279_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.41798    2461269.91798    14.10    04:36:30.25 -12:44:30.0   7710 1724   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52289_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 The candidate 52289_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.41798    2461269.91798    13.40    03:59:37.48 -12:23:39.2   2273 1624   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits **** FOUND 03:59:37.49 -12:23:38.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52294_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 The candidate 52294_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 17.41744    2461269.91744    10.60    04:00:53.94 -10:27:10.5   2380 2812   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.41798    2461269.91798    10.60    04:00:53.92 -10:27:10.6   2381 2808   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52362_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 The candidate 52362_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.41798    2461269.91798    10.77    04:10:33.54 -08:08:00.6   3725 4297   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52421_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 The candidate 52421_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.41798    2461269.91798    11.56    04:06:23.47 -07:36:08.5   3083 4578   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52477_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 The candidate 52477_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.41798    2461269.91798    12.02    03:57:40.07 -13:22:58.3   2026 1004   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52482_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 The candidate 52482_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.41798    2461269.91798    11.86    04:21:07.71 -15:00:37.0   5520 0248   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52498_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 The candidate 52498_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.41798    2461269.91798    12.16    03:46:50.94 -14:36:22.8   0477 0121   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52508_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 The candidate 52508_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.41798    2461269.91798    12.25    03:52:21.66 -12:23:57.1   1196 1536   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52543_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 The candidate 52543_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.41798    2461269.91798    12.30    04:16:08.08 -15:10:06.5   4798 0111   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52598_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 The candidate 52598_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.41798    2461269.91798    12.63    04:16:27.77 -04:59:32.9   4494 6247   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52609_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 The candidate 52609_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.41798    2461269.91798    12.75    03:56:37.80 -10:50:35.8   1763 2526   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits **** FOUND 03:56:37.83 -10:50:35.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52610_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 The candidate 52610_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.41798    2461269.91798    12.59    04:25:20.77 -10:47:00.4   6005 2830   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52611_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 The candidate 52611_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.41798    2461269.91798    12.76    03:51:09.22 -10:46:12.6   0941 2507   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52630_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 The candidate 52630_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 17.41744    2461269.91744    12.64    04:28:06.59 -11:59:08.5   6448 2131   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.41798    2461269.91798    12.67    04:28:06.66 -11:59:08.3   6449 2127   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52645_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 The candidate 52645_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.41798    2461269.91798    12.48    04:39:39.09 -13:10:44.2   8188 1476   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52651_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 The candidate 52651_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.41798    2461269.91798    13.07    03:47:00.32 -07:47:24.4   0171 4264   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52667_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 The candidate 52667_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.41798    2461269.91798    13.00    03:48:13.70 -07:27:37.1   0341 4478   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52675_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 The candidate 52675_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.41798    2461269.91798    12.89    03:51:33.51 -05:56:00.4   0774 5442   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52678_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 The candidate 52678_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.41798    2461269.91798    12.80    04:17:19.35 -10:46:39.1   4821 2769   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52679_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 The candidate 52679_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.41798    2461269.91798    12.94    03:47:47.17 -06:59:01.2   0250 4763   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52689_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 The candidate 52689_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.41798    2461269.91798    12.95    03:50:00.54 -13:14:20.4   0884 0997   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52712_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 The candidate 52712_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.41798    2461269.91798    13.13    03:48:35.56 -05:34:01.7   0303 5635   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52713_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 The candidate 52713_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.41798    2461269.91798    13.14    03:51:43.20 -11:34:42.0   1063 2025   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52725_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 The candidate 52725_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.41798    2461269.91798    13.16    03:55:06.43 -04:57:33.0   1268 6071   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits **** FOUND 03:55:06.44 -04:57:33.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52738_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 The candidate 52738_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.41798    2461269.91798    13.25    03:46:37.87 -11:15:04.1   0284 2160   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52740_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 The candidate 52740_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.41798    2461269.91798    13.18    03:50:09.78 -09:29:15.7   0732 3271   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52744_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 The candidate 52744_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.41798    2461269.91798    13.01    04:46:27.13 -09:54:30.3   9133 3495   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52753_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 The candidate 52753_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.41798    2461269.91798    13.14    03:50:34.70 -14:33:19.9   1029 0203   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52754_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 The candidate 52754_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.41798    2461269.91798    13.06    03:55:38.39 -13:18:24.7   1723 1026   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52758_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 The candidate 52758_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.41798    2461269.91798    13.16    04:45:42.61 -05:37:15.5   8934 6101   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52763_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 Preparing report for the candidate 52763_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52771_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 The candidate 52771_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 17.41744    2461269.91744    13.16    04:25:34.91 -05:13:50.3   5871 6184   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.41798    2461269.91798    13.22    04:25:34.87 -05:13:50.0   5873 6180   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52773_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 The candidate 52773_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.41798    2461269.91798    13.25    03:52:06.95 -11:12:09.3   1105 2257   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52776_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 The candidate 52776_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.41798    2461269.91798    13.23    03:47:54.00 -08:38:31.6   0349 3757   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52777_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 The candidate 52777_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.41798    2461269.91798    13.17    04:17:45.60 -12:53:14.8   4957 1504   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52784_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 The candidate 52784_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.41798    2461269.91798    13.35    03:56:00.78 -05:57:21.8   1452 5473   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52785_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 The candidate 52785_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.41798    2461269.91798    13.14    04:09:16.38 -13:20:19.2   3730 1155   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52804_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 The candidate 52804_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 17.41744    2461269.91744    13.29    03:59:35.18 -12:24:05.7   2267 1623   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.41798    2461269.91798    13.34    03:59:34.99 -12:24:06.7   2267 1619   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52810_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 The candidate 52810_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.41798    2461269.91798    13.67    03:53:47.16 -04:53:39.6   1064 6098   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52812_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 The candidate 52812_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.41798    2461269.91798    13.20    04:05:26.58 -13:57:59.1   3193 0737   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52813_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 The candidate 52813_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.41798    2461269.91798    13.20    03:54:21.27 -10:19:25.0   1400 2814   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52815_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 The candidate 52815_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.41798    2461269.91798    13.22    04:05:54.80 -14:00:09.2   3263 0720   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits **** FOUND 04:05:54.78 -14:00:08.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52832_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 The candidate 52832_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 17.41744    2461269.91744    13.35    04:04:42.59 -06:45:17.7   2796 5078   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.41798    2461269.91798    13.32    04:04:42.63 -06:45:17.9   2797 5073   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52835_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 The candidate 52835_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.41798    2461269.91798    13.42    03:46:38.11 -09:22:22.5   0193 3299   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52873_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 The candidate 52873_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.41798    2461269.91798    13.23    04:42:21.70 -12:47:15.3   8582 1727   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52880_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 The candidate 52880_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.41798    2461269.91798    13.34    04:07:21.44 -05:52:08.8   3159 5634   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52898_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 The candidate 52898_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.41798    2461269.91798    13.45    04:34:42.26 -13:01:01.3   7451 1547   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52921_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 The candidate 52921_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.41798    2461269.91798    13.68    04:11:51.17 -08:48:47.5   3942 3900   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits **** FOUND 04:11:51.20 -08:48:49.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52922_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 The candidate 52922_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 17.41744    2461269.91744    13.40    04:30:15.67 -11:34:54.0   6753 2389   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.41798    2461269.91798    13.41    04:30:15.67 -11:34:53.1   6755 2385   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52943_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 The candidate 52943_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.41798    2461269.91798    13.68    03:58:50.22 -05:46:04.4   1871 5615   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52951_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 The candidate 52951_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 17.41744    2461269.91744    13.61    04:04:28.12 -10:13:00.9   2900 2991   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.41798    2461269.91798    13.61    04:04:28.14 -10:13:01.2   2901 2986   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52963_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 The candidate 52963_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.41798    2461269.91798    13.57    04:46:14.64 -08:54:30.7   9081 4101   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52968_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 The candidate 52968_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.41798    2461269.91798    13.42    04:46:21.59 -11:51:27.1   9160 2311   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52971_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 The candidate 52971_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 17.41744    2461269.91744    13.63    04:10:21.21 -09:20:01.9   3738 3578   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.41798    2461269.91798    13.82    04:10:21.25 -09:20:02.1   3739 3574   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52976_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 The candidate 52976_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.41798    2461269.91798    13.55    03:56:50.43 -05:33:06.4   1559 5727   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52988_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 The candidate 52988_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 17.41744    2461269.91744    13.63    04:16:36.95 -12:31:25.4   4775 1718   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.41798    2461269.91798    13.63    04:16:37.02 -12:31:24.0   4777 1714   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52999_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 The candidate 52999_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.41798    2461269.91798    13.90    04:41:08.03 -05:59:49.8   8243 5837   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53004_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 The candidate 53004_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.41798    2461269.91798    13.48    04:25:11.02 -07:25:17.3   5879 4851   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53005_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 The candidate 53005_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.41798    2461269.91798    13.55    04:47:19.27 -05:49:17.7   9185 5990   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53006_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 The candidate 53006_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.41798    2461269.91798    13.73    03:46:14.82 -12:36:58.3   0292 1326   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53009_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 The candidate 53009_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.41798    2461269.91798    13.50    03:57:53.70 -06:54:07.5   1779 4918   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53016_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 The candidate 53016_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.41798    2461269.91798    13.63    04:05:24.15 -05:01:55.2   2831 6124   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53021_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 The candidate 53021_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.41798    2461269.91798    13.57    04:22:08.98 -12:43:15.1   5595 1640   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53030_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 The candidate 53030_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.41798    2461269.91798    13.54    04:20:53.76 -11:55:21.3   5385 2111   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits **** FOUND 04:20:53.72 -11:55:21.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53033_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 The candidate 53033_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 17.41744    2461269.91744    13.52    04:35:11.49 -12:57:43.9   7520 1587   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.41798    2461269.91798    13.17    04:35:11.91 -12:57:42.2   7523 1583   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53038_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 The candidate 53038_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.41798    2461269.91798    13.73    03:51:30.38 -05:32:20.0   0747 5682   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53054_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 The candidate 53054_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.41798    2461269.91798    13.56    03:50:07.22 -12:43:45.0   0877 1308   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53059_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 The candidate 53059_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 17.41744    2461269.91744    13.72    04:16:41.35 -07:17:49.9   4607 4859   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.41798    2461269.91798    13.66    04:16:41.54 -07:17:51.0   4608 4855   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53060_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 The candidate 53060_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.41798    2461269.91798    13.59    04:34:33.88 -12:37:49.4   7420 1780   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53061_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 The candidate 53061_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.41798    2461269.91798    13.87    03:51:59.74 -13:08:15.1   1175 1084   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53079_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 The candidate 53079_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.41798    2461269.91798    13.69    04:08:24.73 -05:28:32.9   3302 5882   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53081_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 The candidate 53081_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.41798    2461269.91798    13.67    04:40:14.24 -08:33:09.2   8165 4279   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53091_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 The candidate 53091_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.41798    2461269.91798    13.59    03:58:32.43 -10:11:22.6   2019 2941   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53100_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 The candidate 53100_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.41798    2461269.91798    13.82    03:45:38.47 -11:30:07.4   0147 1995   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53105_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 The candidate 53105_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.41798    2461269.91798    13.52    04:38:48.99 -12:46:39.5   8054 1715   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53113_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 The candidate 53113_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.41798    2461269.91798    13.73    04:30:41.22 -11:05:30.6   6804 2683   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53119_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 The candidate 53119_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.41798    2461269.91798    13.54    04:46:15.51 -10:09:43.4   9109 3340   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53137_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 The candidate 53137_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.41798    2461269.91798    13.88    04:28:03.67 -05:15:58.0   6247 6179   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53144_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 The candidate 53144_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.41798    2461269.91798    14.00    03:51:24.85 -07:19:57.9   0819 4590   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53153_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 The candidate 53153_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.41798    2461269.91798    14.39    04:03:40.56 -05:41:04.1   2598 5712   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53166_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 The candidate 53166_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.41798    2461269.91798    14.03    04:10:57.44 -10:54:09.9   3887 2637   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53180_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 The candidate 53180_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.41798    2461269.91798    14.15    04:07:55.40 -09:07:43.7   3371 3674   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53196_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 The candidate 53196_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.41798    2461269.91798    14.34    04:01:49.79 -04:50:05.1   2283 6211   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53197_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 The candidate 53197_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.41798    2461269.91798    13.90    04:22:12.36 -14:58:51.8   5676 0274   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53199_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 The candidate 53199_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.41798    2461269.91798    13.91    04:40:19.36 -05:39:09.6   8112 6041   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53204_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 The candidate 53204_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.41798    2461269.91798    14.50    03:47:38.63 -11:12:10.9   0434 2202   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53215_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 The candidate 53215_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.41798    2461269.91798    13.96    04:40:11.72 -09:05:03.2   8171 3957   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53224_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 The candidate 53224_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.41798    2461269.91798    14.01    03:55:41.27 -07:33:56.3   1476 4494   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53226_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 The candidate 53226_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.41798    2461269.91798    14.02    03:59:14.37 -06:34:14.5   1967 5132   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53228_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 The candidate 53228_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.41798    2461269.91798    13.92    03:59:43.42 -07:54:37.7   2098 4327   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53229_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 The candidate 53229_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.41798    2461269.91798    14.61    04:00:23.67 -07:07:30.3   2165 4808   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53230_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 The candidate 53230_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.41798    2461269.91798    13.92    04:40:37.73 -08:56:48.0   8233 4043   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53236_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 The candidate 53236_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.41798    2461269.91798    14.52    03:54:19.35 -06:18:46.8   1212 5239   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53252_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 The candidate 53252_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.41798    2461269.91798    14.10    04:07:03.51 -11:41:32.3   3342 2125   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53253_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 The candidate 53253_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.41798    2461269.91798    14.51    04:11:03.64 -10:06:40.6   3873 3113   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21056_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 The candidate 21056_fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 08 17.41798    2461269.91798    12.06    03:52:55.48 -09:10:06.1   1133 3495   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_050241_TTUQ1b1x1_1666904_Nkc8KRQ8/fd_Eri-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_05-01-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits **** FOUND 03:52:55.52 -09:10:06.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 11s Prepared the HTML report for the field Eri-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 04:01:04.50 -06:56:15.8 ########### Completed Eri-04-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### 04:01:04.50 -06:56:15.8 ################################################################################### 04:01:04.50 -06:56:15.8 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461269.91744361 -observatory V36 09:05:33.56 +18:00:28.0 Mercury (-1.4mag) 12:34:12.96 -05:28:30.1 Venus (-4.4mag) 06:15:49.21 +23:42:22.3 Mars (1.3mag) 08:51:09.52 +18:10:06.2 Jupiter (-1.8mag) 00:55:30.71 +03:07:09.2 Saturn (0.5mag) 04:12:39.42 +20:59:20.7 Uranus (5.7mag) 00:15:30.24 +00:08:52.5 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:27:16.91 -23:33:33.1 Pluto (14.5mag) 13:19:45.30 -13:22:24.4 Moon (-9.6mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Aug 17 05:04 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461269.91744361: 08:51:05.86 +18:10:23.1 Io (6.1mag) 08:51:01.06 +18:10:45.5 Europa (6.3mag) 08:51:10.14 +18:10:01.6 Ganymede (5.6mag) 08:50:59.30 +18:10:50.2 Callisto (6.8mag) 08:48:37.53 +18:15:07.2 Himalia (15.7mag) 08:51:13.89 +18:09:47.8 Thebe (16.6mag) 08:48:14.87 +18:11:52.3 Elara (17.7mag) 08:55:18.21 +17:45:25.4 Pasiphae (17.9mag) 08:53:43.15 +18:22:28.8 Carme (19.0mag) 00:55:42.79 +03:06:52.7 Titan (8.4mag) 00:55:34.86 +03:06:53.8 Rhea (9.7mag) 00:56:01.15 +03:07:52.1 Iapetus (11.1mag) 00:55:45.58 +03:06:41.3 Hyperion (14.4mag) 00:54:41.51 +02:59:10.0 Phoebe (16.4mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Aug 17 05:05 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461269.91744361: 19:44:07.49 -17:38:07.7 JWST 18:07:37.74 +26:28:57.9 Chandra 06:32:43.81 +15:57:07.8 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Aug 17 05:05 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461269.91744361 -observatory V36 03:23:31.35 +18:05:55.3 17.6mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 18:00:04.14 -34:32:30.2 14.1mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 07:02:10.42 -69:16:09.1 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:12:05.19 +33:11:38.9 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 04:09:06.61 +41:03:03.0 17.2mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 22:30:55.74 +30:48:11.4 17.3mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 06:52:23.03 +26:22:35.2 16.8mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 10:30:06.51 +28:03:46.3 17.0mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 09:35:01.18 +05:18:30.3 18.0mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 15:14:21.06 -12:39:41.3 17.9mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS) 20:59:05.13 +64:50:12.1 17.9mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon) 15:39:49.35 -13:47:07.3 14.5mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 08:18:08.30 +31:46:17.0 15.5mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:05:54.39 +15:33:04.8 17.8mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 18:52:07.90 +43:26:13.2 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 20:56:54.60 +49:36:42.8 17.5mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS) 05:22:13.87 -12:54:04.5 15.4mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 07:01:53.50 +22:30:50.1 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 10:45:58.89 +20:18:07.1 17.2mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 13:03:58.54 +01:42:55.3 16.9mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 16:05:34.84 +76:52:29.1 16.6mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 03:09:43.44 +46:19:26.2 17.2mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 11:54:32.76 +09:28:22.0 17.4mag A/2026 E1 22:07:48.33 -30:47:43.2 7.0mag 10P/Tempel 11:34:35.59 -03:59:12.8 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 11:26:24.15 +01:37:59.4 17.4mag 63P/Wild 00:52:56.68 -05:50:42.0 15.4mag 65P/Gunn 05:56:05.47 +20:27:07.2 13.7mag 78P/Gehrels 20:29:48.95 -24:31:40.9 17.6mag 84P/Giclas 03:08:43.42 +14:17:23.8 16.8mag 88P/Howell 08:18:47.30 +26:20:47.1 16.3mag 93P/Lovas 04:32:46.55 +20:28:02.8 17.3mag 112P/Urata-Niijima 06:26:39.53 +29:07:24.9 16.1mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 09:40:10.03 +25:01:28.7 14.9mag 123P/West-Hartley 12:02:18.80 -13:45:50.9 17.2mag 124P/Mrkos 05:49:52.31 +21:06:18.6 16.0mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 06:43:57.65 +18:24:26.2 17.9mag 131P/Mueller 00:01:16.66 +03:14:54.2 17.5mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma 03:14:54.04 -18:48:56.7 13.2mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 07:47:24.84 +38:06:24.0 16.0mag 162P/Siding Spring 12:11:40.36 +36:48:39.1 12.0mag 169P/NEAT 02:58:45.63 +09:30:53.2 17.6mag 220P/McNaught 16:47:07.90 -10:46:14.4 17.9mag 235P/LINEAR 20:17:34.61 -52:20:56.6 17.9mag 259P/Garradd 03:48:56.87 +28:55:53.0 15.3mag 260P/McNaught 07:32:51.75 +37:22:48.1 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR 15:13:55.46 +02:06:48.3 17.8mag 391P/Kowalski 09:09:15.50 +17:55:07.4 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.3K Aug 17 05:04 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08 22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17 14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02 12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61 16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09 01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97 21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13 18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06 12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98 13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38 18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63 14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15 20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53 19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82 19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31 17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67 19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52 18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92 19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91 19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81 04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96 13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01 16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07 10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63 14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62 13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09 00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13 11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56 21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14 17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72 14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53 20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4 15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57 23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64 17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15 00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20 AT2026ntk 2026-06-18.09 17.34 20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93 23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83 02:02:26.67 +32:04:22.70 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.6 15.52 21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05 17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62 13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24 00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22 14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32 12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69 12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02 10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75 13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58 00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58 01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70 SN 2026obc 2026-06-7.43 15.15 21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90 ASASSN-26dr 2026-06-7.24 16.24 06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00 ASASSN-26ds 2026-06-2.97 15.02 20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12 11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63 11:44:33.11 -68:48:32.90 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24.03 8.35 19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28 14:23:56.59 -58:37:47.40 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.59 11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46 21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86 00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34 15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44 11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55 13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96 02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37 17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7 01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8 16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8 09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63 21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9 14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21 14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89 12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5 13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23 09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51 15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.40 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.07 13.88 10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52 22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2 21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51 16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.15 15.93 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Aug 17 05:04 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2 PNV J00423868+4115582 2026-06-05.1224 19.97Umag 19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7 PNV J19004295-4831017 2026-05-25.0752 14.2mag 09:55:21.28 +69:02:52.6 PNV J09552128+6902526 2026-06-13.933 18.9mag 19:51:21.42 +37:06:40.0 TCP J19512142+3706400 2026-06-17.2942 16.8mag 19:57:03.87 +37:41:46.4 TCP J19570387+3741464 2026-06-18.2638 17.5mag 00:42:32.04 +41:10:28.3 PNV J00423204+4110283 2026-06-26.059 16.6mag 02:19:17.36 +28:57:15.8 TCP J02191736+2857158 2026-07-12.3549 12.5mag 00:44:56.43 +41:57:41.6 PNV J00445643+4157416 2026-07-13.8026 17.98Cmag 00:42:55.36 +41:17:27.0 PNV J00425536+4117270 2026-07-20.1813 17.7mag 20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9 TCP J20354364+6131329 2026-07-20.5443 14.4mag 21:17:31.48 +22:25:51.0 TCP J21173148+2225510 2026-07-23.5577 14.8mag 00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8 PNV J00412404+4049028 2026-07-25.0157 18.7mag 00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6 PNV J00430426+4102286 2026-07-26.1512 20mag 14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0 TCP J14515140+6613240 2026-07-29.2561 13.5mag 00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2 PNV J00430615+4122082 2026-07-30.0085 19.4mag 00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2 PNV J00413323+4110122 2026-08-02.8913 17.1mag 05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-06.4109 11.2mag 22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8 TCP J22571796+4707418 2026-08-09.3289 14.3mag 09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1 PSN J09133817+7628181 2026-08-09.8037 15.4mag 00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6 PNV J00431729+4126486 2026-08-14.0920 16.8mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 190K Aug 17 05:04 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 17:33:41.626 +03:55:57.27 AT 2026wvz 2026-07-19.23 21.0254 17:50:01.721 +10:25:24.49 AT 2026wvy 2026-07-26.20 20.1407 16:10:31.606 +03:57:43.31 AT 2026wvx 2026-07-17.26 20.7944 20:33:52.488 +03:24:38.01 AT 2026wvw 2026-07-23.32 20.8661 00:41:33.169 +41:10:12.40 AT 2026wvv 2026-08-02.89 17.1 23:45:36.740 -03:05:35.56 AT 2026wvu 2026-07-25.60 21.95 22:40:08.792 -06:25:00.39 AT 2026wvt 2026-07-24.51 21.53 18:01:34.940 +35:37:53.90 AT 2026wvs 2026-07-23.31 21.74 23:25:28.465 -20:01:24.81 AT 2026wvr 2026-07-26.54 20.7 23:40:24.824 -24:40:33.31 AT 2026wvq 2026-07-26.54 20.89 21:22:15.890 -02:33:52.37 AT 2026wvp 2026-07-25.44 21.07 22:10:23.762 +16:20:18.77 AT 2026wvo 2026-07-25.45 21.13 23:06:39.906 +05:33:08.21 AT 2026wvn 2026-07-24.57 21.75 00:44:57.801 +25:20:50.30 AT 2026wvm 2026-07-23.55 21.26 23:50:27.739 -03:51:06.21 AT 2026wvl 2026-07-25.58 20.96 00:25:21.084 +26:42:45.70 AT 2026wvk 2026-07-23.55 20.96 23:37:13.087 -06:14:48.44 AT 2026wvj 2026-07-25.59 22.23 00:43:40.407 -30:43:14.55 AT 2026wvi 2026-07-26.58 20.68 22:42:59.067 -07:40:12.15 AT 2026wvh 2026-07-24.50 21.36 22:23:10.327 -02:22:08.97 AT 2026wvg 2026-07-24.49 20.89 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 87K Aug 17 05:04 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 69 C