NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields Cet-05-Q1b1x1

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 08 17.40735    2461269.90735    12.06    00:14:53.80 -05:20:44.7   2682 0290   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.40790    2461269.90790    12.05    00:14:53.80 -05:20:44.8   2677 0286   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 08 17.4076  2461269.9076  12.05  00:14:53.80 -05:20:44.7
 99.53383 -66.54311 galactic  Psc  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 6.5 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
106 Dione                   -0      0       1  12.2     0    0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:14:53.80 -05:20:44.7:  15.42 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:14:53.80 -05:20:44.7:  15.47 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Cet-05-Q1b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 08 17.40735    2461269.90735    12.39    00:08:47.86 -11:09:21.4   3403 3846   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.40790    2461269.90790    12.40    00:08:47.82 -11:09:21.0   3398 3842   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 08 17.4076  2461269.9076  12.39  00:08:47.84 -11:09:21.2
 88.77195 -71.14245 galactic  Cet  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 6.3 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
118 Peitho                  -0     -0       1  12.6     0   -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:08:47.84 -11:09:21.2:  15.48 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:08:47.84 -11:09:21.2:  15.49 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Cet-05-Q1b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 08 17.40735    2461269.90735    13.05    23:43:03.47 -09:48:06.0   7263 3286   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.40790    2461269.90790    13.07    23:43:03.41 -09:48:07.0   7258 3282   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 08 17.4076  2461269.9076  13.06  23:43:03.44 -09:48:06.5
 76.75060 -66.33042 galactic  Aqr  Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 6.3 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
530 Turandot                -1     -0       1  13.1    -0   -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:43:03.44 -09:48:06.5:  15.43 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:43:03.44 -09:48:06.5:  15.48 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Cet-05-Q1b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 08 17.40735    2461269.90735    13.34    23:32:03.63 -07:38:11.8   9021 2107   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.40790    2461269.90790    13.36    23:32:03.56 -07:38:11.1   9016 2103   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 08 17.4076  2461269.9076  13.35  23:32:03.59 -07:38:11.5
 75.29519 -62.91204 galactic  Aqr  Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 6.5 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
442 Eichsfeldia             -1      0       1  13.4    -0   -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:32:03.59 -07:38:11.5:  15.21 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:32:03.59 -07:38:11.5:  15.21 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Cet-05-Q1b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 08 17.40735    2461269.90735    14.16    00:24:01.92 -08:53:23.4   1202 2363   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.40790    2461269.90790    14.39    00:24:02.06 -08:53:22.4   1196 2359   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 08 17.4076  2461269.9076  14.28  00:24:01.99 -08:53:22.9
102.10083 -70.64494 galactic  Cet  Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.3" and 6.9 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
1133 Lugduna                  0      0       0  14.3    -0   -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:24:01.99 -08:53:22.9:  15.39 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:24:01.99 -08:53:22.9:  15.43 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Cet-05-Q1b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 5

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field Cet-05-Q1b1x1 reference image: Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Field Cet-05-Q1b1x1 reference image: Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Field Cet-05-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits
Field Cet-05-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Cet-05-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Cet-05-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Cet-05-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 592744 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 592744 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits_preview.png'
Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits

renamed 'Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits_preview.png'
Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 765.4159 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 439.5498 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1314.1411 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 503.4545 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1315.2043 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 504.2309 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 1.7169 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.002 INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 23.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 21.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-17T04:46:25.1422281' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-17T09:46:25.1422281' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61269.4072354399 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-17T09:46:35.0457407' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61269.4073500577 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 359.997695009046 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = -9.99968672804775 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 45.3427777777778 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 194.342777777778 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.4044780918077 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cet-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '00 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-10 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29515 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29515 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 23.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 23.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 10.0 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 48.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 906.1 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 21.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 230.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 7.200576 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 5.400432 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/d_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits :) Spent 0.500633 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/d_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 22.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 21.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-17T04:47:12.4225916' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-17T09:47:12.4225916' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61269.4077826622 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-17T09:47:22.3255999' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61269.4078972801 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 359.997694972665 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = -9.99968673621127 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 45.3011111111111 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 194.617777777778 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.40548479623537 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cet-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '00 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-10 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29515 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29515 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 22.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 22.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 10.0 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 48.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 906.1 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 21.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 230.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 7.200576 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 5.400432 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/d_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits :) Spent 0.493301 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/d_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits


fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461269.90735118 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits Image size: 937.6'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 23:59:42.748 -09:56:16.73 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37 Second-epoch image center 23:59:42.748 -09:56:16.73 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0966 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 23:59:40.591 -09:56:37.78 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37 Second-epoch image center 23:59:40.591 -09:56:37.78 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0999 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 23:59:42.748 -09:56:16.73 Second-epoch second image center 23:59:40.591 -09:56:37.78 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01061 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits &> /tmp/tmp.MhdbJcA7cK Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits &> /tmp/tmp.b3IFQgvm16 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ijlEHzVaSW Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits &> /tmp/tmp.CrGtM8ldAa Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 4374 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9535 to 8.0780 deg, Dec -15.2625 to -4.6835 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9535 to 8.0780 deg, Dec -15.2625 to -4.6835 deg Loaded 4197 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3165 out of 3236 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3236 out of 4374 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.569700 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.569700 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.87 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.70 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.70
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 4374 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9535 to 8.0780 deg, Dec -15.2625 to -4.6835 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9535 to 8.0780 deg, Dec -15.2625 to -4.6835 deg Loaded 4197 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3165 out of 3236 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3236 out of 4374 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (aperture=7.1) The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 4358 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9535 to 8.0779 deg, Dec -15.2626 to -4.6837 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9535 to 8.0779 deg, Dec -15.2626 to -4.6837 deg Loaded 4197 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3202 out of 3251 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3251 out of 4358 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits (aperture=6.5) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.6 pix Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits 2.3 pix Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits 2.2 pix fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits 2.2 pix fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 14.7 mag. Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits 14.7 mag. Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits 14.9 mag. fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits 14.9 mag. fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 11.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory ############ /tmp/tmp.MhdbJcA7cK (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=278, bad_region=0, passed=4374 Got 4374 stars (including 4092 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4374 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9535 through 0 to 8.0780, gap 8.0780 to 351.9535 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3993 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3991 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3991 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3991 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4374 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9539 through 0 to 8.0777, gap 8.0777 to 351.9539 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3993 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3991 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4374 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3991 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4374 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Excluding outliers - 3991 stars left (next iteration limit 4390) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits N_match=3991 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.337 n_q1=1080 n_q2=969 n_q3=999 n_q4=943 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.109 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits -region wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.b3IFQgvm16 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=264, bad_region=0, passed=4358 Got 4358 stars (including 4088 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4358 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9535 through 0 to 8.0779, gap 8.0779 to 351.9535 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3990 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3988 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3988 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3988 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4358 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9539 through 0 to 8.0776, gap 8.0776 to 351.9539 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3990 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3988 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4358 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3988 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4358 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Excluding outliers - 3988 stars left (next iteration limit 4386) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits N_match=3988 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.291 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.280 n_q1=1022 n_q2=971 n_q3=1079 n_q4=916 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.078 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits -region wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.ijlEHzVaSW (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=341, bad_region=0, passed=4540 Got 4540 stars (including 4194 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4540 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5887 through 0 to 8.1111, gap 8.1111 to 351.5887 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4092 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4089 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4089 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4089 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4540 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5885 through 0 to 8.1115, gap 8.1115 to 351.5885 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4094 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4091 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4540 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4091 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4540 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Excluding outliers - 4091 stars left (next iteration limit 4497) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4091 robust_rms=12.217 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.068 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4091 robust_rms=0.502 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.558 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4091 robust_rms=0.341 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.388 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4091 robust_rms_before=1.152 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.343 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.341 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.390 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.388 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.390 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits N_match=4091 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.327 n_q1=933 n_q2=1046 n_q3=1031 n_q4=1081 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.078 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.CrGtM8ldAa (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=331, bad_region=0, passed=4537 Got 4537 stars (including 4204 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4537 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5887 through 0 to 8.1110, gap 8.1110 to 351.5887 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.5 to -4.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4103 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4100 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4100 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4100 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4537 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5885 through 0 to 8.1116, gap 8.1116 to 351.5885 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.5 to -4.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4103 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4100 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4537 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4100 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4537 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Excluding outliers - 4100 stars left (next iteration limit 4510) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4100 robust_rms=12.155 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.837 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4100 robust_rms=0.491 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.538 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4100 robust_rms=0.335 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.371 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4100 robust_rms_before=1.159 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.332 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.335 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.374 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.371 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.374 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits N_match=4100 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.308 n_q1=957 n_q2=1048 n_q3=1030 n_q4=1065 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.088 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits' ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits sigma_overall=0.350 worst_q_ratio=1.109 ref2=Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits sigma_overall=0.291 worst_q_ratio=1.078 new1=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits sigma_overall=0.348 worst_q_ratio=1.078 new2=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits sigma_overall=0.343 worst_q_ratio=1.088 reference average sigma_overall=0.3205 worst_q_ratio=1.0935 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021_astrometric_residuals.png (3991 matched stars from wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490_astrometric_residuals.png (3988 matched stars from wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436_astrometric_residuals.png (4091 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437_astrometric_residuals.png (4100 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 No candidates found here Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits Image size: 937.6'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 23:59:42.748 -09:56:16.73 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37 Second-epoch image center 23:59:42.748 -09:56:16.73 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0966 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 23:59:40.591 -09:56:37.78 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37 Second-epoch image center 23:59:40.591 -09:56:37.78 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0999 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 23:59:42.748 -09:56:16.73 Second-epoch second image center 23:59:40.591 -09:56:37.78 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01061 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits &> /tmp/tmp.26JubURwWM Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qis3O5lT8l Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XlXTvm8dFW Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits &> /tmp/tmp.meL2BCdBoC Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 22737 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9459 to 8.0985 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9459 to 8.0985 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg Loaded 4214 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3418 out of 3629 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3629 out of 22737 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.388800 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.388800 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.56 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.83 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.83
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 22737 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9459 to 8.0985 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9459 to 8.0985 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg Loaded 4214 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3418 out of 3629 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3629 out of 22737 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (aperture=5.3) The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 23415 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9462 to 8.0901 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9462 to 8.0901 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg Loaded 4212 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3459 out of 3633 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3633 out of 23415 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits (aperture=5.1) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 51 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.4 pix Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits 2.2 pix Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits 2.0 pix fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits 2.0 pix fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 14.8 mag. Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits 14.9 mag. Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits 15.1 mag. fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits 15.1 mag. fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.1 (SNR ) 14.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.26JubURwWM (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=913, bad_region=0, passed=22729 Got 22729 stars (including 21779 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 22729 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9459 through 0 to 8.0985, gap 8.0985 to 351.9459 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4870 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4864 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22729 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9463 through 0 to 8.0982, gap 8.0982 to 351.9463 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4870 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22729 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22729 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Excluding outliers - 4864 stars left (next iteration limit 5350) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits N_match=4864 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.415 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.337 n_q1=1269 n_q2=1240 n_q3=1176 n_q4=1179 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.175 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits -region wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.qis3O5lT8l (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=831, bad_region=0, passed=23408 Got 23408 stars (including 22542 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23408 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9462 through 0 to 8.0901, gap 8.0901 to 351.9462 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4860 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23408 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9465 through 0 to 8.0899, gap 8.0899 to 351.9465 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23408 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23408 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Excluding outliers - 4860 stars left (next iteration limit 5346) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits N_match=4860 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.270 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.297 n_q1=1259 n_q2=1185 n_q3=1245 n_q4=1171 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.107 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits -region wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.XlXTvm8dFW (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=1072, bad_region=35, passed=26842 Got 26842 stars (including 25689 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 26842 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5465 through 0 to 8.1198, gap 8.1198 to 351.5465 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4871 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4867 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4867 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4867 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26842 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5462 through 0 to 8.1204, gap 8.1204 to 351.5462 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4871 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4867 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26842 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4867 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26842 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Excluding outliers - 4867 stars left (next iteration limit 5353) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4867 robust_rms=11.560 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.076 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4867 robust_rms=0.503 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.544 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4867 robust_rms=0.343 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.394 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4867 robust_rms_before=1.149 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.345 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.343 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.385 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.394 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.385 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits N_match=4867 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.323 n_q1=1199 n_q2=1273 n_q3=1171 n_q4=1224 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.079 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.meL2BCdBoC (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=1049, bad_region=39, passed=26773 Got 26773 stars (including 25642 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 26773 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5464 through 0 to 8.1110, gap 8.1110 to 351.5464 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4868 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4865 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4865 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4865 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26773 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5462 through 0 to 8.1115, gap 8.1115 to 351.5462 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4868 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4865 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26773 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4865 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26773 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Excluding outliers - 4865 stars left (next iteration limit 5351) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4865 robust_rms=11.676 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.148 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4865 robust_rms=0.498 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.533 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4865 robust_rms=0.336 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.376 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4865 robust_rms_before=1.158 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.337 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.336 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.369 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.376 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.369 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits N_match=4865 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.299 n_q1=1195 n_q2=1265 n_q3=1177 n_q4=1228 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.083 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:44:33.05 -11:37:10.9: 13.59 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:13:02.65 -05:59:51.8: 13.83 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:33:41.47 -06:46:10.2: 14.03 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:06:27.14 -13:24:53.3: 13.92 +/- 0.09 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:17:28.35 -10:23:33.4: 13.59 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:14:19.27 -12:45:00.9: 13.37 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:08:45.38 -06:28:01.6: 13.48 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:26:56.47 -14:40:51.1: 13.16 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:29:34.50 -05:21:35.7: 13.72 +/- 0.09 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:42:24.58 -06:00:21.7: 13.49 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:29:34.50 -05:21:35.7: 13.61 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:42:24.58 -06:00:21.7: 13.74 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:44:33.05 -11:37:10.9: 13.60 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:33:41.47 -06:46:10.2: 13.89 +/- 0.11 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:14:19.27 -12:45:00.9: 13.34 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:06:27.14 -13:24:53.3: 14.27 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:26:56.47 -14:40:51.1: 13.26 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:08:45.38 -06:28:01.6: 14.03 +/- 0.09 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:13:02.65 -05:59:51.8: 13.98 +/- 0.09 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:17:28.35 -10:23:33.4: 13.65 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.66 +/- 0.06 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.59 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:29:34.50 -05:21:35.7: ref_mag=13.66 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.8651 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.36 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.59 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.08 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.20 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.05 +/- 0.07 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:42:24.58 -06:00:21.7: ref_mag=13.59 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1004 delta=-0.51 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.06 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.62 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:14:19.27 -12:45:00.9: ref_mag=13.36 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7539 delta=-0.40 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:44:33.05 -11:37:10.9: ref_mag=13.59 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9234 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:33:41.47 -06:46:10.2: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.2768 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:26:56.47 -14:40:51.1: ref_mag=13.20 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2714 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:08:45.38 -06:28:01.6: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0685 delta=-0.43 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:06:27.14 -13:24:53.3: ref_mag=14.05 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.3330 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:17:28.35 -10:23:33.4: ref_mag=13.62 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1126 delta=-0.49 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:13:02.65 -05:59:51.8: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.3370 delta=-0.44 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:30:00.28 -09:52:27.3: 12.43 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:43:03.44 -09:48:06.5: 15.43 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:44:42.15 -07:35:00.0: 12.10 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:57:51.43 -07:49:35.2: 12.52 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:43:36.27 -07:55:57.4: 11.78 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:08:47.84 -11:09:21.2: 15.48 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:51:01.64 -05:38:20.0: 12.79 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:14:53.80 -05:20:44.7: 15.42 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:54:35.17 -07:43:44.7: 12.82 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:32:03.59 -07:38:11.5: 15.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:43:03.44 -09:48:06.5: 15.48 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:08:47.84 -11:09:21.2: 15.49 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:30:00.28 -09:52:27.3: 12.48 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:44:42.15 -07:35:00.0: 12.26 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:14:53.80 -05:20:44.7: 15.47 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:54:35.17 -07:43:44.7: 12.82 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:32:03.59 -07:38:11.5: 15.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:51:01.64 -05:38:20.0: 12.97 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:57:51.43 -07:49:35.2: 12.76 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.45 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:00.28 -09:52:27.3: ref_mag=12.45 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6961 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.82 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.17 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:54:35.17 -07:43:44.7: ref_mag=12.82 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3102 delta=-0.49 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.87 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:44:42.15 -07:35:00.0: ref_mag=12.17 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8158 delta=-0.64 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:43:36.27 -07:55:57.4: 12.09 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.62 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:51:01.64 -05:38:20.0: ref_mag=12.87 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4086 delta=-0.54 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:57:51.43 -07:49:35.2: ref_mag=12.62 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3182 delta=-0.70 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.89 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:43:36.27 -07:55:57.4: ref_mag=11.89 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6234 delta=-0.73 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:29:59.00 -14:20:26.6: 14.24 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:35:29.27 -07:57:25.1: 13.54 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:52:48.94 -06:31:07.6: 13.29 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:33:10.24 -12:23:26.4: 13.82 +/- 0.11 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:56:18.84 -09:31:10.9: 13.86 +/- 0.09 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:48:06.69 -07:36:48.0: 12.85 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:52:48.94 -06:31:07.6: 13.25 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:29:59.00 -14:20:26.6: 14.25 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.27 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.25 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:52:48.94 -06:31:07.6: ref_mag=13.27 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3731 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:33:10.24 -12:23:26.4: 14.03 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:29:59.00 -14:20:26.6: ref_mag=14.25 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.8691 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:56:18.84 -09:31:10.9: 13.78 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:35:29.27 -07:57:25.1: 13.79 +/- 0.09 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:48:06.69 -07:36:48.0: 13.03 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.08 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.82 +/- 0.06 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.06 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:33:10.24 -12:23:26.4: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.0030 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:56:18.84 -09:31:10.9: ref_mag=13.82 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.0319 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.93 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:35:29.27 -07:57:25.1: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.1330 delta=-0.49 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:48:06.69 -07:36:48.0: ref_mag=12.93 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3217 delta=-0.39 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:28:38.59 -13:42:40.3: 14.14 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:41:53.89 -05:33:12.2: 14.39 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:31:04.66 -05:20:02.0: 14.19 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:52:43.31 -06:40:27.4: 14.38 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:29:12.57 -09:31:32.3: 14.20 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:35:47.13 -05:37:06.9: 14.42 +/- 0.20 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:28:38.59 -13:42:40.3: 14.23 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:41:53.89 -05:33:12.2: 14.33 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.18 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.36 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:28:38.59 -13:42:40.3: ref_mag=14.18 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.9623 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:41:53.89 -05:33:12.2: ref_mag=14.36 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.2822 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:31:04.66 -05:20:02.0: 14.51 +/- 0.21 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:29:12.57 -09:31:32.3: 14.14 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:52:43.31 -06:40:27.4: 14.23 +/- 0.11 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:35:47.13 -05:37:06.9: 14.18 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.17 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.31 +/- 0.13 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.29 +/- 0.09 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:29:12.57 -09:31:32.3: ref_mag=14.17 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.2473 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.27 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:31:04.66 -05:20:02.0: ref_mag=14.31 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.3840 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:52:43.31 -06:40:27.4: ref_mag=14.29 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.3958 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:35:47.13 -05:37:06.9: ref_mag=14.27 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4228 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:39:31.77 -05:40:45.8: 14.56 +/- 0.20 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:24:01.99 -08:53:22.9: 15.39 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:41:25.03 -06:14:30.8: 14.53 +/- 0.18 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:43:59.39 -08:18:32.5: 14.48 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:33:08.55 -07:39:58.2: 14.44 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:31:36.18 -10:20:03.2: 13.94 +/- 0.11 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:39:31.77 -05:40:45.8: 14.30 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:24:01.99 -08:53:22.9: 15.43 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.40 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:39:31.77 -05:40:45.8: ref_mag=14.40 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.3682 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:43:59.39 -08:18:32.5: 14.39 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:41:25.03 -06:14:30.8: 14.49 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:33:08.55 -07:39:58.2: 14.30 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:31:36.18 -10:20:03.2: 13.96 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.43 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:43:59.39 -08:18:32.5: ref_mag=14.43 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3201 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.51 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.36 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.08 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:41:25.03 -06:14:30.8: ref_mag=14.51 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.2795 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:33:08.55 -07:39:58.2: ref_mag=14.36 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.3325 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:31:36.18 -10:20:03.2: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.0684 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:30:06.72 -08:21:05.8: 14.52 +/- 0.20 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:32:03.33 -09:46:22.6: 14.45 +/- 0.18 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:29:31.82 -07:35:34.0: 14.47 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:09:28.86 -08:29:47.6: 13.74 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:34:45.21 -07:13:53.4: 14.52 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:30:06.72 -08:21:05.8: 14.22 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.33 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:30:06.72 -08:21:05.8: ref_mag=14.33 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.3576 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:09:28.86 -08:29:47.6: 13.97 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:32:03.33 -09:46:22.6: 14.46 +/- 0.18 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:34:45.21 -07:13:53.4: 14.16 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:29:31.82 -07:35:34.0: 14.37 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.45 +/- 0.13 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:09:28.86 -08:29:47.6: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1990 delta=-0.36 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:32:03.33 -09:46:22.6: ref_mag=14.45 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.3837 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.28 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.41 +/- 0.13 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:34:45.21 -07:13:53.4: ref_mag=14.28 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4240 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:29:31.82 -07:35:34.0: ref_mag=14.41 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.3649 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:30:05.27 -13:36:24.0: 14.62 +/- 0.25 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:10:33.32 -14:24:38.7: 14.98 +/- 0.26 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:26:36.84 -14:52:38.5: 14.10 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:26:13.78 -14:49:00.5: 14.74 +/- 0.24 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:28:11.66 -14:33:06.8: 14.61 +/- 0.22 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:30:05.27 -13:36:24.0: 14.23 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.35 +/- 0.14 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:30:05.27 -13:36:24.0: ref_mag=14.35 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.2580 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:10:33.32 -14:24:38.7: 15.04 +/- 0.28 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:26:36.84 -14:52:38.5: 14.28 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.01 +/- 0.19 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.18 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:10:33.32 -14:24:38.7: ref_mag=15.01 +/- 0.19 new_mean_mag=14.1478 delta=0.86 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:26:36.84 -14:52:38.5: ref_mag=14.18 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.0720 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:26:13.78 -14:49:00.5: 14.31 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.45 +/- 0.13 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:26:13.78 -14:49:00.5: ref_mag=14.45 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.2039 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:28:11.66 -14:33:06.8: 14.64 +/- 0.23 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.16 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:28:11.66 -14:33:06.8: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.1610 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:40:11.35 -13:04:09.1: 14.34 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:22:28.17 -13:43:49.5: 14.71 +/- 0.20 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:40:11.35 -13:04:09.1: 14.41 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:22:28.17 -13:43:49.5: 14.50 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.38 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:40:11.35 -13:04:09.1: ref_mag=14.38 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3410 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.58 +/- 0.13 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:22:28.17 -13:43:49.5: ref_mag=14.58 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.3520 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90) Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32539.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32603.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32706.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32764.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out33159.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32391_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 The candidate 32391_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 17.40735    2461269.90735    14.24    00:06:27.19 -13:24:54.6   3669 5227   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.40790    2461269.90790    14.47    00:06:27.08 -13:24:52.1   3664 5222   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32395_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 The candidate 32395_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 17.40735    2461269.90735    14.26    00:13:02.64 -05:59:51.6   2941 0702   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.40790    2461269.90790    14.44    00:13:02.67 -05:59:51.9   2936 0698   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32396_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 The candidate 32396_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 17.40735    2461269.90735    14.21    00:08:45.44 -06:28:01.6   3569 1024   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.40790    2461269.90790    13.99    00:08:45.31 -06:28:01.6   3564 1021   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32397_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 The candidate 32397_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 17.40735    2461269.90735    14.11    00:17:28.38 -10:23:34.4   2141 3319   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.40790    2461269.90790    14.12    00:17:28.32 -10:23:32.4   2136 3315   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32398_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 The candidate 32398_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 17.40735    2461269.90735    14.28    23:33:41.45 -06:46:10.1   8819 1562   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.40790    2461269.90790    14.28    23:33:41.49 -06:46:10.4   8813 1558   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32400_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 The candidate 32400_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 17.40735    2461269.90735    13.92    23:44:33.06 -11:37:10.6   6958 4363   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.40790    2461269.90790    13.92    23:44:33.04 -11:37:11.2   6953 4359   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32401_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 The candidate 32401_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 17.40735    2461269.90735    14.09    23:42:24.54 -06:00:21.8   7537 1003   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.40790    2461269.90790    14.11    23:42:24.63 -06:00:21.6   7532 0999   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32402_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 The candidate 32402_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 17.40735    2461269.90735    13.75    00:14:19.26 -12:44:59.8   2535 4764   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.40790    2461269.90790    13.75    00:14:19.29 -12:45:02.1   2529 4761   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32403_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 The candidate 32403_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 17.40735    2461269.90735    13.91    00:29:34.53 -05:21:35.2   0448 0172   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.40790    2461269.90790    13.83    00:29:34.48 -05:21:36.2   0443 0168   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32405_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 The candidate 32405_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 17.40735    2461269.90735    13.29    00:26:56.40 -14:40:51.7   0606 5863   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.40790    2461269.90790    13.26    00:26:56.55 -14:40:50.5   0601 5859   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32407_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 The candidate 32407_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 17.40735    2461269.90735    13.36    23:57:51.46 -07:49:35.5   5146 1945   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.40790    2461269.90790    13.28    23:57:51.40 -07:49:34.9   5141 1941   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32408_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 The candidate 32408_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 17.40735    2461269.90735    13.28    23:54:35.17 -07:43:44.6   5637 1918   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.40790    2461269.90790    13.34    23:54:35.16 -07:43:44.8   5632 1914   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32409_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 The candidate 32409_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 17.40735    2461269.90735    12.77    00:30:00.28 -09:52:27.6   0273 2920   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.40790    2461269.90790    12.65    00:30:00.27 -09:52:27.0   0268 2916   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32410_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 The candidate 32410_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 17.40735    2461269.90735    12.85    23:44:42.18 -07:34:59.9   7119 1932   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.40790    2461269.90790    12.79    23:44:42.12 -07:35:00.1   7114 1928   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32412_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 The candidate 32412_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 17.40735    2461269.90735    12.60    23:43:36.28 -07:55:57.3   7267 2154   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.40790    2461269.90790    12.65    23:43:36.26 -07:55:57.4   7262 2150   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32539_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 Preparing report for the candidate 32539_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32603_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 Preparing report for the candidate 32603_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32706_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 Preparing report for the candidate 32706_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32749_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 The candidate 32749_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 17.40735    2461269.90735    13.31    23:51:01.65 -05:38:20.1   6257 0693   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.40790    2461269.90790    13.56    23:51:01.63 -05:38:19.9   6252 0689   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32764_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 Preparing report for the candidate 32764_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32788_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 The candidate 32788_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 17.40735    2461269.90735    13.33    23:48:06.68 -07:36:47.7   6607 1914   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.40790    2461269.90790    13.31    23:48:06.70 -07:36:48.2   6602 1910   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32809_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 The candidate 32809_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 17.40735    2461269.90735    13.46    23:52:48.93 -06:31:08.0   5951 1207   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.40790    2461269.90790    13.32    23:52:48.95 -06:31:07.3   5946 1203   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33049_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 The candidate 33049_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 17.40735    2461269.90735    13.98    23:33:10.21 -12:23:26.8   8612 4970   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.40790    2461269.90790    14.04    23:33:10.28 -12:23:26.0   8607 4965   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33050_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 The candidate 33050_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 17.40735    2461269.90735    14.08    23:35:29.32 -07:57:24.9   8486 2260   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.40790    2461269.90790    14.20    23:35:29.22 -07:57:25.3   8481 2256   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33053_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 The candidate 33053_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 17.40735    2461269.90735    13.87    00:29:59.10 -14:20:26.9   0161 5641   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.40790    2461269.90790    13.87    00:29:58.90 -14:20:26.4   0156 5637   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33060_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 The candidate 33060_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 17.40735    2461269.90735    14.02    23:56:18.79 -09:31:11.1   5308 2977   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.40790    2461269.90790    14.05    23:56:18.89 -09:31:10.6   5303 2973   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33082_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 The candidate 33082_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 17.40735    2461269.90735    13.87    00:28:38.64 -13:42:40.1   0379 5262   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.40790    2461269.90790    14.10    00:28:38.54 -13:42:40.5   0374 5258   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33092_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 The candidate 33092_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 17.40735    2461269.90735    14.28    23:41:53.90 -05:33:12.1   7636 0734   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.40790    2461269.90790    14.29    23:41:53.88 -05:33:12.2   7631 0730   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33123_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 The candidate 33123_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 17.40735    2461269.90735    14.31    23:31:04.68 -05:20:01.6   9293 0717   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.40790    2461269.90790    14.49    23:31:04.63 -05:20:02.4   9288 0714   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33130_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 The candidate 33130_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 17.40735    2461269.90735    14.24    23:29:12.57 -09:31:32.3   9355 3287   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.40790    2461269.90790    14.26    23:29:12.57 -09:31:32.4   9349 3283   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33133_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 The candidate 33133_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 17.40735    2461269.90735    14.35    23:35:47.14 -05:37:05.8   8560 0839   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.40790    2461269.90790    14.63    23:35:47.13 -05:37:08.0   8554 0835   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33152_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 The candidate 33152_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 17.40735    2461269.90735    14.27    23:52:43.31 -06:40:27.7   5959 1301   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.40790    2461269.90790    14.66    23:52:43.31 -06:40:27.2   5954 1297   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33154_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 The candidate 33154_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 17.40735    2461269.90735    14.35    23:39:31.68 -05:40:45.9   7988 0836   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.40790    2461269.90790    14.39    23:39:31.86 -05:40:45.6   7983 0832   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33159_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 Preparing report for the candidate 33159_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33165_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 The candidate 33165_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 17.40735    2461269.90735    14.30    23:41:25.03 -06:14:30.8   7675 1157   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.40790    2461269.90790    14.26    23:41:25.03 -06:14:30.7   7670 1153   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33166_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 The candidate 33166_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 17.40735    2461269.90735    14.27    23:43:59.41 -08:18:32.6   7192 2377   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.40790    2461269.90790    14.40    23:43:59.36 -08:18:32.4   7187 2373   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33169_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 The candidate 33169_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 17.40735    2461269.90735    14.18    23:31:36.19 -10:20:02.9   8951 3745   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.40790    2461269.90790    14.00    23:31:36.16 -10:20:03.6   8946 3741   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33172_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 The candidate 33172_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 17.40735    2461269.90735    14.33    23:33:08.52 -07:39:57.5   8856 2112   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.40790    2461269.90790    14.34    23:33:08.57 -07:39:58.8   8850 2108   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33174_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 The candidate 33174_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 17.40735    2461269.90735    14.34    23:30:06.79 -08:21:05.8   9280 2564   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.40790    2461269.90790    14.39    23:30:06.65 -08:21:05.9   9275 2560   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33188_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 The candidate 33188_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 17.40735    2461269.90735    14.34    23:34:45.27 -07:13:54.2   8634 1830   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.40790    2461269.90790    14.57    23:34:45.14 -07:13:52.5   8629 1826   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33193_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 The candidate 33193_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 17.40735    2461269.90735    14.33    23:29:31.84 -07:35:33.8   9409 2110   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.40790    2461269.90790    14.40    23:29:31.81 -07:35:34.1   9403 2107   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33207_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 The candidate 33207_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 17.40735    2461269.90735    14.29    23:32:03.38 -09:46:21.6   8911 3400   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.40790    2461269.90790    14.54    23:32:03.28 -09:46:23.7   8906 3396   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33234_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 The candidate 33234_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 17.40735    2461269.90735    14.26    00:09:28.86 -08:29:47.1   3392 2241   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.40790    2461269.90790    14.15    00:09:28.85 -08:29:48.2   3387 2238   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33235_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 The candidate 33235_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 17.40735    2461269.90735    14.23    23:30:05.21 -13:36:24.2   9011 5751   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.40790    2461269.90790    14.30    23:30:05.32 -13:36:23.9   9005 5747   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33242_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 The candidate 33242_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 17.40735    2461269.90735    14.15    00:10:33.28 -14:24:38.0   3033 5797   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.40790    2461269.90790    14.14    00:10:33.35 -14:24:39.4   3028 5793   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33264_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 The candidate 33264_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 17.40735    2461269.90735    14.09    00:26:13.69 -14:49:00.4   0709 5949   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.40790    2461269.90790    14.39    00:26:13.88 -14:49:00.6   0703 5946   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33299_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 The candidate 33299_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 17.40735    2461269.90735    14.12    00:26:36.81 -14:52:37.8   0650 5984   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.40790    2461269.90790    14.03    00:26:36.87 -14:52:39.1   0644 5981   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33316_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 The candidate 33316_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.40790    2461269.90790    14.56    00:28:10.87 -13:25:16.5   0451 5084   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits **** FOUND 00:28:10.79 -13:25:15.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33322_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 The candidate 33322_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 17.40735    2461269.90735    14.15    00:28:11.63 -14:33:05.8   0423 5778   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.40790    2461269.90790    14.18    00:28:11.69 -14:33:07.9   0418 5775   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33376_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 The candidate 33376_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 17.40735    2461269.90735    14.35    23:40:11.39 -13:04:09.4   7537 5289   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.40790    2461269.90790    14.33    23:40:11.31 -13:04:08.8   7532 5285   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33501_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 The candidate 33501_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 17.40735    2461269.90735    14.35    00:22:28.13 -13:43:49.9   1299 5306   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-46-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0436.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 17.40790    2461269.90790    14.35    00:22:28.21 -13:43:49.0   1293 5302   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044834_TTUQ1b1x1_1070993_Btc6AkJs/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-47-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0437.fits make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 15s Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 00:14:53.80 -05:20:44.7 00:08:47.84 -11:09:21.2 23:43:03.44 -09:48:06.5 23:32:03.59 -07:38:11.5 00:24:01.99 -08:53:22.9 ########### Completed Cet-05-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### 00:14:53.80 -05:20:44.7 00:08:47.84 -11:09:21.2 23:43:03.44 -09:48:06.5 23:32:03.59 -07:38:11.5 00:24:01.99 -08:53:22.9 ################################################################################### 00:14:53.80 -05:20:44.7 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 00:08:47.84 -11:09:21.2 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 23:43:03.44 -09:48:06.5 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 23:32:03.59 -07:38:11.5 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 00:24:01.99 -08:53:22.9 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461269.90735118 -observatory V36 09:05:28.68 +18:00:44.4 Mercury (-1.4mag) 12:34:10.91 -05:28:12.9 Venus (-4.4mag) 06:15:47.48 +23:42:22.3 Mars (1.3mag) 08:51:08.98 +18:10:08.3 Jupiter (-1.8mag) 00:55:30.79 +03:07:09.9 Saturn (0.5mag) 04:12:39.37 +20:59:20.5 Uranus (5.7mag) 00:15:30.29 +00:08:52.8 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:27:16.96 -23:33:32.9 Pluto (14.5mag) 13:19:05.05 -13:19:18.3 Moon (-9.6mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Aug 17 04:50 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461269.90735118: 08:51:05.46 +18:10:24.5 Io (6.1mag) 08:51:00.55 +18:10:47.4 Europa (6.3mag) 08:51:09.74 +18:10:03.0 Ganymede (5.6mag) 08:50:58.86 +18:10:51.8 Callisto (6.8mag) 08:48:36.99 +18:15:08.9 Himalia (15.7mag) 08:51:13.45 +18:09:49.4 Thebe (16.6mag) 08:48:14.32 +18:11:54.1 Elara (17.7mag) 08:55:17.67 +17:45:27.7 Pasiphae (17.9mag) 08:53:42.65 +18:22:30.7 Carme (19.0mag) 00:55:42.87 +03:06:53.2 Titan (8.4mag) 00:55:34.91 +03:06:54.4 Rhea (9.7mag) 00:56:01.21 +03:07:52.7 Iapetus (11.1mag) 00:55:45.65 +03:06:41.8 Hyperion (14.4mag) 00:54:41.60 +02:59:10.7 Phoebe (16.4mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Aug 17 04:51 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461269.90735118: 19:44:05.32 -17:38:46.3 JWST 18:06:34.44 +26:50:20.7 Chandra 06:28:41.31 +18:03:20.0 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Aug 17 04:51 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461269.90735118 -observatory V36 03:23:30.76 +18:05:52.6 17.6mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 18:00:04.19 -34:32:30.8 14.1mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 07:02:09.88 -69:16:07.5 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:12:05.05 +33:11:38.0 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 04:09:05.13 +41:02:51.5 17.2mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 22:30:56.26 +30:48:14.4 17.3mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 06:52:22.47 +26:22:35.9 16.8mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 10:30:05.94 +28:03:47.8 17.0mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 09:35:00.77 +05:18:30.4 18.0mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 15:14:20.91 -12:39:39.7 17.9mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS) 20:59:05.86 +64:50:17.5 17.9mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon) 15:39:49.79 -13:47:04.0 14.5mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 08:18:07.66 +31:46:15.2 15.5mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:05:54.42 +15:33:05.1 17.8mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 18:52:08.58 +43:26:12.6 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 20:56:55.53 +49:36:41.9 17.5mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS) 05:22:13.43 -12:54:04.6 15.4mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 07:01:53.15 +22:30:56.6 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 10:45:58.00 +20:18:09.5 17.2mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 13:03:58.12 +01:42:57.9 16.9mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 16:05:34.35 +76:52:33.4 16.6mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 03:09:43.38 +46:19:25.8 17.2mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 11:54:32.23 +09:28:18.6 17.4mag A/2026 E1 22:07:47.82 -30:47:31.4 7.0mag 10P/Tempel 11:34:35.21 -03:59:10.4 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 11:26:22.91 +01:38:11.3 17.4mag 63P/Wild 00:52:56.82 -05:50:40.2 15.4mag 65P/Gunn 05:56:04.14 +20:27:08.4 13.7mag 78P/Gehrels 20:29:49.48 -24:31:37.3 17.6mag 84P/Giclas 03:08:42.99 +14:17:21.7 16.8mag 88P/Howell 08:18:45.84 +26:20:52.5 16.3mag 93P/Lovas 04:32:44.77 +20:27:48.4 17.3mag 112P/Urata-Niijima 06:26:37.57 +29:07:30.4 16.1mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 09:40:08.61 +25:01:35.4 14.9mag 123P/West-Hartley 12:02:17.55 -13:45:37.3 17.2mag 124P/Mrkos 05:49:51.46 +21:06:19.0 16.0mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 06:43:56.65 +18:24:28.3 17.9mag 131P/Mueller 00:01:16.85 +03:14:55.2 17.5mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma 03:14:54.58 -18:48:58.0 13.2mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 07:47:22.83 +38:06:23.5 16.0mag 162P/Siding Spring 12:11:50.20 +36:49:25.3 12.0mag 169P/NEAT 02:58:44.70 +09:30:53.7 17.6mag 220P/McNaught 16:47:07.48 -10:46:11.7 17.9mag 235P/LINEAR 20:17:34.85 -52:21:00.3 17.9mag 259P/Garradd 03:48:55.13 +28:55:38.6 15.3mag 260P/McNaught 07:32:49.96 +37:22:49.9 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR 15:13:55.20 +02:06:52.4 17.8mag 391P/Kowalski 09:09:14.94 +17:55:09.2 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.3K Aug 17 04:50 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08 22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17 14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02 12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61 16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09 01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97 21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13 18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06 12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98 13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38 18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63 14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15 20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53 19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82 19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31 17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67 19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52 18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92 19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91 19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81 04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96 13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01 16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07 10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63 14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62 13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09 00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13 11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56 21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14 17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72 14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53 20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4 15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57 23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64 17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15 00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20 AT2026ntk 2026-06-18.09 17.34 20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93 23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83 02:02:26.67 +32:04:22.70 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.6 15.52 21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05 17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62 13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24 00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22 14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32 12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69 12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02 10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75 13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58 00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58 01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70 SN 2026obc 2026-06-7.43 15.15 21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90 ASASSN-26dr 2026-06-7.24 16.24 06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00 ASASSN-26ds 2026-06-2.97 15.02 20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12 11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63 11:44:33.11 -68:48:32.90 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24.03 8.35 19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28 14:23:56.59 -58:37:47.40 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.59 11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46 21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86 00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34 15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44 11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55 13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96 02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37 17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7 01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8 16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8 09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63 21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9 14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21 14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89 12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5 13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23 09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51 15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.40 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.07 13.88 10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52 22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2 21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51 16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.15 15.93 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Aug 17 04:50 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2 PNV J00423868+4115582 2026-06-05.1224 19.97Umag 19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7 PNV J19004295-4831017 2026-05-25.0752 14.2mag 09:55:21.28 +69:02:52.6 PNV J09552128+6902526 2026-06-13.933 18.9mag 19:51:21.42 +37:06:40.0 TCP J19512142+3706400 2026-06-17.2942 16.8mag 19:57:03.87 +37:41:46.4 TCP J19570387+3741464 2026-06-18.2638 17.5mag 00:42:32.04 +41:10:28.3 PNV J00423204+4110283 2026-06-26.059 16.6mag 02:19:17.36 +28:57:15.8 TCP J02191736+2857158 2026-07-12.3549 12.5mag 00:44:56.43 +41:57:41.6 PNV J00445643+4157416 2026-07-13.8026 17.98Cmag 00:42:55.36 +41:17:27.0 PNV J00425536+4117270 2026-07-20.1813 17.7mag 20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9 TCP J20354364+6131329 2026-07-20.5443 14.4mag 21:17:31.48 +22:25:51.0 TCP J21173148+2225510 2026-07-23.5577 14.8mag 00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8 PNV J00412404+4049028 2026-07-25.0157 18.7mag 00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6 PNV J00430426+4102286 2026-07-26.1512 20mag 14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0 TCP J14515140+6613240 2026-07-29.2561 13.5mag 00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2 PNV J00430615+4122082 2026-07-30.0085 19.4mag 00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2 PNV J00413323+4110122 2026-08-02.8913 17.1mag 05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-06.4109 11.2mag 22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8 TCP J22571796+4707418 2026-08-09.3289 14.3mag 09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1 PSN J09133817+7628181 2026-08-09.8037 15.4mag 00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6 PNV J00431729+4126486 2026-08-14.0920 16.8mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 190K Aug 17 04:50 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 17:33:41.626 +03:55:57.27 AT 2026wvz 2026-07-19.23 21.0254 17:50:01.721 +10:25:24.49 AT 2026wvy 2026-07-26.20 20.1407 16:10:31.606 +03:57:43.31 AT 2026wvx 2026-07-17.26 20.7944 20:33:52.488 +03:24:38.01 AT 2026wvw 2026-07-23.32 20.8661 00:41:33.169 +41:10:12.40 AT 2026wvv 2026-08-02.89 17.1 23:45:36.740 -03:05:35.56 AT 2026wvu 2026-07-25.60 21.95 22:40:08.792 -06:25:00.39 AT 2026wvt 2026-07-24.51 21.53 18:01:34.940 +35:37:53.90 AT 2026wvs 2026-07-23.31 21.74 23:25:28.465 -20:01:24.81 AT 2026wvr 2026-07-26.54 20.7 23:40:24.824 -24:40:33.31 AT 2026wvq 2026-07-26.54 20.89 21:22:15.890 -02:33:52.37 AT 2026wvp 2026-07-25.44 21.07 22:10:23.762 +16:20:18.77 AT 2026wvo 2026-07-25.45 21.13 23:06:39.906 +05:33:08.21 AT 2026wvn 2026-07-24.57 21.75 00:44:57.801 +25:20:50.30 AT 2026wvm 2026-07-23.55 21.26 23:50:27.739 -03:51:06.21 AT 2026wvl 2026-07-25.58 20.96 00:25:21.084 +26:42:45.70 AT 2026wvk 2026-07-23.55 20.96 23:37:13.087 -06:14:48.44 AT 2026wvj 2026-07-25.59 22.23 00:43:40.407 -30:43:14.55 AT 2026wvi 2026-07-26.58 20.68 22:42:59.067 -07:40:12.15 AT 2026wvh 2026-07-24.50 21.36 22:23:10.327 -02:22:08.97 AT 2026wvg 2026-07-24.49 20.89 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 87K Aug 17 04:50 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 97 C - WARNING