This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040428_TTUQ2b1x1_3575240_aqmW1fnA
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 17.3645 2461269.8645 13.82 03:38:53.27 +17:02:18.6
170.39297 -30.00764 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 4.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.62 Erato -0 0 0 14.0 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:38:53.27 +17:02:18.6: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:38:53.27 +17:02:18.6: 16.24 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 17.3645* 03 38 53.27 +17 02 18.6 13.8 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461269.8645,13.82,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260817.3645 13.82CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 17.3645 2461269.8645 14.35 03:27:48.89 +16:15:29.5
168.72211 -32.37417 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 4.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.443 Photographica 0 -0 1 14.7 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:27:48.89 +16:15:29.5: 16.27 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:27:48.89 +16:15:29.5: 16.28 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 17.3645* 03 27 48.89 +16 15 29.5 14.3 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461269.8645,14.35,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260817.3645 14.35CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 17.3645 2461269.8645 14.55 03:31:32.19 +15:57:39.1
169.74173 -31.99631 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 4.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.131 Vala 0 0 0 15.1 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:31:32.19 +15:57:39.1: 16.30 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:31:32.19 +15:57:39.1: 16.28 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 17.3645* 03 31 32.19 +15 57 39.1 14.6 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461269.8645,14.55,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260817.3645 14.55CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.67169814 09.01.2026 04:07:04.719 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
First image: 2461049.67169814 09.01.2026 04:07:04.719 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
Last image: 2461269.86476204 17.08.2026 08:45:05.440 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040428_TTUQ2b1x1_3575240_aqmW1fnA/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 1
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.54
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6719
Objects passed selection criteria: 6689
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 4980.5
Average stars matched: 4608.5 (92.5309 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 232684 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Aug 17 04:06:45 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.67169814 09.01.2026 04:07:04.719 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
First image: 2461049.67169814 09.01.2026 04:07:04.719 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
Last image: 2461269.86476204 17.08.2026 08:45:05.440 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040428_TTUQ2b1x1_3575240_aqmW1fnA/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 107
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.21
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 13 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 42904
Objects passed selection criteria: 42790
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 32308.2
Average stars matched: 29789.5 (92.204 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 262472 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Aug 17 04:07:37 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040428_TTUQ2b1x1_3575240_aqmW1fnA/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-44-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040428_TTUQ2b1x1_3575240_aqmW1fnA/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040428_TTUQ2b1x1_3575240_aqmW1fnA/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-44-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040428_TTUQ2b1x1_3575240_aqmW1fnA/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461269.86430789
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-44-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:33:20.383 +13:59:53.59 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-44-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-44-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:33:20.020 +14:00:03.29 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:33:20.383 +13:59:53.59
Second-epoch image center 03:33:20.020 +14:00:03.29
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0031 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:33:20.413 +14:00:28.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:33:20.383 +13:59:53.59
Second-epoch image center 03:33:20.413 +14:00:28.20
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0096 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 03:33:20.020 +14:00:03.29
Second-epoch second image center 03:33:20.413 +14:00:28.20
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00710 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits &> /tmp/tmp.EHEZtjx0NZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NYFKcsj4bJ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040428_TTUQ2b1x1_3575240_aqmW1fnA/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-44-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4cwFrGPckI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040428_TTUQ2b1x1_3575240_aqmW1fnA/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-44-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040428_TTUQ2b1x1_3575240_aqmW1fnA/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fMLLVWkt0R
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040428_TTUQ2b1x1_3575240_aqmW1fnA/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits and wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits and wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits and wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7716 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 45.0636 to 61.6428 deg, Dec +8.6205 to +19.2872 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 45.0636 to 61.6428 deg, Dec 8.6205 to 19.2872 deg
Loaded 4361 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3534 out of 3742 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3742 out of 7716 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.950750
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.950750
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.54
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.41
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.41
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 7716 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 45.0636 to 61.6428 deg, Dec +8.6205 to +19.2872 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 45.0636 to 61.6428 deg, Dec 8.6205 to 19.2872 deg
Loaded 4361 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3534 out of 3742 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3742 out of 7716 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 7722 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 45.0650 to 61.6427 deg, Dec +8.6182 to +19.2791 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 45.0650 to 61.6427 deg, Dec 8.6182 to 19.2791 deg
Loaded 4354 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3534 out of 3736 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3736 out of 7722 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
2.0 pix Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
2.3 pix fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-44-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits
2.3 pix fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
15.4 mag. Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-44-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 11.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.EHEZtjx0NZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040428_TTUQ2b1x1_3575240_aqmW1fnA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=551, bad_region=1716, passed=7716
Got 7716 stars (including 5573 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7716 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4894 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6339 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6339 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6339 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4894 stars left (next iteration limit 5383)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits N_match=4894 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.271 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.268 n_q1=1724 n_q2=1005 n_q3=1514 n_q4=651 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.261
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits -region wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.NYFKcsj4bJ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040428_TTUQ2b1x1_3575240_aqmW1fnA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=536, bad_region=1716, passed=7722
Got 7722 stars (including 5589 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7722 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4905 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4897 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6342 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4905 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6342 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6342 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4898 stars left (next iteration limit 5386)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits N_match=4898 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.409 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.297 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.276 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.273 n_q1=1731 n_q2=1006 n_q3=1513 n_q4=648 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.264
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits -region wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.4cwFrGPckI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040428_TTUQ2b1x1_3575240_aqmW1fnA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040428_TTUQ2b1x1_3575240_aqmW1fnA/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-44-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040428_TTUQ2b1x1_3575240_aqmW1fnA/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-44-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040428_TTUQ2b1x1_3575240_aqmW1fnA/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-44-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040428_TTUQ2b1x1_3575240_aqmW1fnA/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-44-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040428_TTUQ2b1x1_3575240_aqmW1fnA/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-44-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040428_TTUQ2b1x1_3575240_aqmW1fnA/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-44-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-44-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-44-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-44-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-44-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-44-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-44-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-44-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040428_TTUQ2b1x1_3575240_aqmW1fnA/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-44-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-44-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=294, bad_region=1233, passed=5242
Got 5242 stars (including 3768 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-44-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5242 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3697 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3691 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3691 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3691 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4262 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3698 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3692 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4262 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3692 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4262 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 3692 stars left (next iteration limit 4060)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3692 robust_rms=7.194 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.043 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3692 robust_rms=0.430 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.440 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3692 robust_rms=0.376 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.413 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3692 robust_rms_before=0.984 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.373 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.376 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.395 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.413
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.395 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-44-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits N_match=3692 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.401 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.409 n_q1=983 n_q2=616 n_q3=1298 n_q4=795 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.063
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-44-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-44-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040428_TTUQ2b1x1_3575240_aqmW1fnA/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-44-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-44-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-44-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.fMLLVWkt0R (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040428_TTUQ2b1x1_3575240_aqmW1fnA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040428_TTUQ2b1x1_3575240_aqmW1fnA/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040428_TTUQ2b1x1_3575240_aqmW1fnA/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040428_TTUQ2b1x1_3575240_aqmW1fnA/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040428_TTUQ2b1x1_3575240_aqmW1fnA/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040428_TTUQ2b1x1_3575240_aqmW1fnA/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040428_TTUQ2b1x1_3575240_aqmW1fnA/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040428_TTUQ2b1x1_3575240_aqmW1fnA/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=292, bad_region=1241, passed=5266
Got 5266 stars (including 3784 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5266 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3712 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3706 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3706 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3706 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4279 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3714 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3708 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4279 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3708 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4279 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 3708 stars left (next iteration limit 4076)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3708 robust_rms=7.250 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.427 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3708 robust_rms=0.441 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.485 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3708 robust_rms=0.372 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.399 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3708 robust_rms_before=1.004 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.363 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.372 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.379 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.399
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.379 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407.fits N_match=3708 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.394 n_q1=980 n_q2=619 n_q3=1312 n_q4=797 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.062
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040428_TTUQ2b1x1_3575240_aqmW1fnA/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-44-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-44-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-44-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits sigma_overall=0.317 worst_q_ratio=1.261
ref2=Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits sigma_overall=0.324 worst_q_ratio=1.264
new1=fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-44-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits sigma_overall=0.385 worst_q_ratio=1.063
new2=fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407.fits sigma_overall=0.371 worst_q_ratio=1.062
reference average sigma_overall=0.3205 worst_q_ratio=1.2625
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137_astrometric_residuals.png (4894 matched stars from wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138_astrometric_residuals.png (4898 matched stars from wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-44-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0406_astrometric_residuals.png (3692 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-44-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407_astrometric_residuals.png (3708 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-44-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-44-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040428_TTUQ2b1x1_3575240_aqmW1fnA/wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-44-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040428_TTUQ2b1x1_3575240_aqmW1fnA/wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:25:43.76 +17:25:56.6: 11.76 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:25:43.76 +17:25:56.6: 11.75 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.76 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:25:43.76 +17:25:56.6: ref_mag=11.76 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=12.0381 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20313_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 20313_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040428_TTUQ2b1x1_3575240_aqmW1fnA/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-44-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040428_TTUQ2b1x1_3575240_aqmW1fnA/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040428_TTUQ2b1x1_3575240_aqmW1fnA/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-44-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040428_TTUQ2b1x1_3575240_aqmW1fnA/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-44-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-44-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:33:20.383 +13:59:53.59 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-44-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-44-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:33:20.020 +14:00:03.29 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:33:20.383 +13:59:53.59
Second-epoch image center 03:33:20.020 +14:00:03.29
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0031 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:33:20.413 +14:00:28.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:33:20.383 +13:59:53.59
Second-epoch image center 03:33:20.413 +14:00:28.20
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0096 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 03:33:20.020 +14:00:03.29
Second-epoch second image center 03:33:20.413 +14:00:28.20
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00710 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WMiJJ3pZ7p
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6RdEMDnkAY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040428_TTUQ2b1x1_3575240_aqmW1fnA/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-44-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits &> /tmp/tmp.poU4RMgjIL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040428_TTUQ2b1x1_3575240_aqmW1fnA/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-44-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040428_TTUQ2b1x1_3575240_aqmW1fnA/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407.fits &> /tmp/tmp.suI7ouVT68
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040428_TTUQ2b1x1_3575240_aqmW1fnA/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits and wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits and wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits and wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 48584 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 45.0636 to 61.6458 deg, Dec +8.6191 to +19.2871 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 45.0636 to 61.6458 deg, Dec 8.6191 to 19.2871 deg
Loaded 4361 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3309 out of 3760 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3760 out of 48584 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.817800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.817800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.21
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.61
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.61
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 48584 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 45.0636 to 61.6458 deg, Dec +8.6191 to +19.2871 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 45.0636 to 61.6458 deg, Dec 8.6191 to 19.2871 deg
Loaded 4361 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3309 out of 3760 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3760 out of 48584 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 48560 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 45.0650 to 61.6548 deg, Dec +8.6183 to +19.2794 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 45.0650 to 61.6548 deg, Dec 8.6183 to 19.2794 deg
Loaded 4358 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3320 out of 3753 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3753 out of 48560 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 75 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
1.9 pix Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
2.2 pix fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-44-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits
2.2 pix fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
15.6 mag. Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-44-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 14.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.WMiJJ3pZ7p (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040428_TTUQ2b1x1_3575240_aqmW1fnA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=2222, bad_region=8835, passed=48571
Got 48571 stars (including 37859 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 48571 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4893 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41607 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41607 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41607 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4893 stars left (next iteration limit 5382)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits N_match=4893 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.297 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.269 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.268 n_q1=1704 n_q2=988 n_q3=1521 n_q4=680 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.244
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits -region wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.6RdEMDnkAY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040428_TTUQ2b1x1_3575240_aqmW1fnA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=2192, bad_region=8846, passed=48544
Got 48544 stars (including 37859 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 48544 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4897 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4890 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41566 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4897 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4891 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41566 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4891 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41566 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4891 stars left (next iteration limit 5379)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits N_match=4891 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.392 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.285 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.263 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.271 n_q1=1699 n_q2=994 n_q3=1515 n_q4=683 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.265
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits -region wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.poU4RMgjIL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040428_TTUQ2b1x1_3575240_aqmW1fnA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040428_TTUQ2b1x1_3575240_aqmW1fnA/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-44-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040428_TTUQ2b1x1_3575240_aqmW1fnA/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-44-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040428_TTUQ2b1x1_3575240_aqmW1fnA/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-44-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040428_TTUQ2b1x1_3575240_aqmW1fnA/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-44-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040428_TTUQ2b1x1_3575240_aqmW1fnA/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-44-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040428_TTUQ2b1x1_3575240_aqmW1fnA/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-44-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-44-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-44-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-44-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-44-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-44-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-44-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-44-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040428_TTUQ2b1x1_3575240_aqmW1fnA/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-44-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-44-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=1217, bad_region=5060, passed=30311
Got 30311 stars (including 24409 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-44-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30311 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4889 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4881 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26552 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4889 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26552 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26552 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4881 stars left (next iteration limit 5369)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-44-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4881 robust_rms=6.897 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=9.229 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4881 robust_rms=0.439 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.452 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4881 robust_rms=0.380 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.416 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4881 robust_rms_before=0.982 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.363 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.380 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.387 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.416
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.387 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-44-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits N_match=4881 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.399 n_q1=1289 n_q2=726 n_q3=1805 n_q4=1061 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.096
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-44-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-44-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040428_TTUQ2b1x1_3575240_aqmW1fnA/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-44-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-44-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-44-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.suI7ouVT68 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040428_TTUQ2b1x1_3575240_aqmW1fnA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040428_TTUQ2b1x1_3575240_aqmW1fnA/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040428_TTUQ2b1x1_3575240_aqmW1fnA/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040428_TTUQ2b1x1_3575240_aqmW1fnA/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040428_TTUQ2b1x1_3575240_aqmW1fnA/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040428_TTUQ2b1x1_3575240_aqmW1fnA/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040428_TTUQ2b1x1_3575240_aqmW1fnA/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040428_TTUQ2b1x1_3575240_aqmW1fnA/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=1209, bad_region=5095, passed=30384
Got 30384 stars (including 24439 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30384 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4885 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4877 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26598 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4884 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26598 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26598 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4876 stars left (next iteration limit 5363)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4876 robust_rms=6.963 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=9.931 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4876 robust_rms=0.448 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.482 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4876 robust_rms=0.376 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.399 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4876 robust_rms_before=1.003 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.367 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.376 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.382 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.399
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.382 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407.fits N_match=4876 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.386 n_q1=1290 n_q2=733 n_q3=1800 n_q4=1053 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.018
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040428_TTUQ2b1x1_3575240_aqmW1fnA/fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-44-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040428_TTUQ2b1x1_3575240_aqmW1fnA/wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-44-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0406.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_040428_TTUQ2b1x1_3575240_aqmW1fnA/wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:38:53.27 +17:02:18.6: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:37:27.72 +18:12:48.4: 14.01 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:27:48.89 +16:15:29.5: 16.27 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:38:53.27 +17:02:18.6: 16.24 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:31:32.19 +15:57:39.1: 16.30 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:15:44.02 +15:31:05.1: 15.15 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:27:43.63 +16:56:30.6: 15.40 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:37:27.72 +18:12:48.4: 14.01 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.01 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:37:27.72 +18:12:48.4: ref_mag=14.01 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0836 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:27:48.89 +16:15:29.5: 16.28 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:31:32.19 +15:57:39.1: 16.28 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:15:44.02 +15:31:05.1: 14.84 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.95 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:15:44.02 +15:31:05.1: ref_mag=14.95 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.7809 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:27:43.63 +16:56:30.6: 15.47 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.43 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:27:43.63 +16:56:30.6: ref_mag=15.43 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.9004 delta=0.53 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out56759.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out58461.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out58722.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52897_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 52897_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:28:01.91 +18:05:23.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53827_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 53827_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54397_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 54397_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54859_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 54859_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54900_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 54900_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54929_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 54929_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55127_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 55127_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55199_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 55199_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55253_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 55253_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55295_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 55295_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55341_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 55341_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55403_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 55403_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55453_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 55453_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:36:02.17 +16:29:19.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55523_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 55523_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55529_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 55529_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55587_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 55587_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55748_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 55748_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55782_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 55782_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55813_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 55813_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55849_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 55849_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:45:03.03 +09:55:48.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55888_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 55888_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55949_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 55949_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55963_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 55963_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56024_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 56024_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:49:22.08 +17:49:47.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56054_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 56054_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56058_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 56058_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56083_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 56083_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56133_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 56133_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56192_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 56192_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56290_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 56290_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56444_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 56444_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:30:23.46 +11:18:38.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56519_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 56519_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56576_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 56576_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56603_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 56603_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56651_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 56651_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56702_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 56702_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56750_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 56750_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56759_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407
Preparing report for the candidate 56759_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56829_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 56829_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:40:57.63 +13:44:24.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56920_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 56920_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56976_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 56976_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57048_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 57048_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57070_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 57070_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:36:16.20 +17:49:41.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57213_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 57213_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57286_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 57286_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57302_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 57302_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57393_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 57393_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57601_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 57601_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57647_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 57647_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57849_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 57849_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57968_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 57968_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58076_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 58076_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58103_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 58103_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58122_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 58122_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58255_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 58255_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58267_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 58267_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58404_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 58404_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58461_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407
Preparing report for the candidate 58461_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58651_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 58651_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58722_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407
Preparing report for the candidate 58722_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58863_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 58863_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58883_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 58883_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58902_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 58902_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59002_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 59002_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59014_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 59014_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59081_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 59081_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59273_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 59273_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59336_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 59336_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59361_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 59361_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59406_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 59406_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59408_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 59408_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59409_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 59409_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59441_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 59441_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59460_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 59460_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07349_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407
The candidate 07349_fd_Tau-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_03-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0407 did not pass the final checks