This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040134_TTUQ1b1x1_3430333_FVpaXAzU
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 17.3755 2461269.8755 12.55 06:32:50.25 +32:09:35.5
182.03047 10.46479 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 8.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.250 Bettina 0 -0 0 13.3 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:32:50.25 +32:09:35.5: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:32:50.25 +32:09:35.5: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461269.8755,12.55,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260817.3755 12.55CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 17.3755 2461269.8755 12.48 06:29:08.12 +24:34:15.5
188.54374 6.37102 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 8.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.30 Urania 2 1 2 12.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:29:08.12 +24:34:15.5: 15.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:29:08.12 +24:34:15.5: 15.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461269.8755,12.48,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260817.3755 12.48CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 17.3755 2461269.8755 13.48 05:43:11.24 +32:00:58.4
177.10069 1.16467 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 8.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.172 Baucis -0 -1 1 13.8 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:43:11.24 +32:00:58.4: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:43:11.24 +32:00:58.4: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461269.8755,13.48,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260817.3755 13.48CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 17.3755 2461269.8755 13.33 06:11:14.98 +33:03:58.8
179.13975 6.81542 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.3" and 8.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.702 Alauda 0 -1 1 13.7 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:11:14.98 +33:03:58.8: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:11:14.98 +33:03:58.8: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461269.8755,13.33,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260817.3755 13.33CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 17.3755 2461269.8755 11.88 06:06:47.46 +31:49:51.1
179.78327 5.40060 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 8.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.115 Thyra 1 0 1 12.2 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:06:47.46 +31:49:51.1: 16.07 +/- 0.35 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:06:47.46 +31:49:51.1: 15.17 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.32 +/- 0.14
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461269.8755,11.88,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260817.3755 11.88CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 17.3755 2461269.8755 13.06 06:16:49.72 +29:22:41.9
182.98166 6.14377 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.7" and 8.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" NSVS J0616488+292244
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
15.281 g Y 0.414 g 2458493.98430 95.138939200000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:16:49.72 +29:22:41.9: 14.00 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:16:49.72 +29:22:41.9: 14.04 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0616488+292244,2461269.8755,13.06,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0616488+292244 20260817.3755 13.06CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.61992316 22.02.2026 02:52:31.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
First image: 2461093.61992316 22.02.2026 02:52:31.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Last image: 2461269.87578667 17.08.2026 09:00:57.968 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040134_TTUQ1b1x1_3430333_FVpaXAzU/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 7
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.72
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 25294
Objects passed selection criteria: 25180
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 18916.5
Average stars matched: 18388.8 (97.2101 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 252108 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Aug 17 04:04:43 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.61992316 22.02.2026 02:52:31.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
First image: 2461093.61992316 22.02.2026 02:52:31.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Last image: 2461269.87578667 17.08.2026 09:00:57.968 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040134_TTUQ1b1x1_3430333_FVpaXAzU/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 185
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.36
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 49 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 194059
Objects passed selection criteria: 193574
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 149160
Average stars matched: 143808 (96.4119 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 588700 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Aug 17 04:06:12 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040134_TTUQ1b1x1_3430333_FVpaXAzU/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040134_TTUQ1b1x1_3430333_FVpaXAzU/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040134_TTUQ1b1x1_3430333_FVpaXAzU/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040134_TTUQ1b1x1_3430333_FVpaXAzU/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461269.87515156
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:00.478 +29:59:52.02 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits
Image size: 945.4'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:59:46.289 +29:55:41.98 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:00:00.478 +29:59:52.02
Second-epoch image center 05:59:46.289 +29:55:41.98
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0863 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits
Image size: 945.1'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:59:49.483 +29:56:09.97 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:00:00.478 +29:59:52.02
Second-epoch image center 05:59:49.483 +29:56:09.97
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0733 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:59:46.289 +29:55:41.98
Second-epoch second image center 05:59:49.483 +29:56:09.97
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01391 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nstcV1JgfK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kjbxVfn4EH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040134_TTUQ1b1x1_3430333_FVpaXAzU/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits &> /tmp/tmp.tP1bD5k1CY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040134_TTUQ1b1x1_3430333_FVpaXAzU/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040134_TTUQ1b1x1_3430333_FVpaXAzU/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UF80wjiGn9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040134_TTUQ1b1x1_3430333_FVpaXAzU/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 27193 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5790 to 99.6671 deg, Dec +24.3414 to +35.3066 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5790 to 99.6671 deg, Dec 24.3414 to 35.3066 deg
Loaded 17097 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 12045 out of 13628 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 13628 out of 27193 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.946400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.946400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.72
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.23
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.23
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 27193 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5790 to 99.6671 deg, Dec +24.3414 to +35.3066 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5790 to 99.6671 deg, Dec 24.3414 to 35.3066 deg
Loaded 17097 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 12045 out of 13628 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 13628 out of 27193 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 27141 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5933 to 99.6669 deg, Dec +24.3420 to +35.3116 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5933 to 99.6669 deg, Dec 24.3420 to 35.3116 deg
Loaded 17089 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 12096 out of 13641 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 13641 out of 27141 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 7 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
2.1 pix Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
2.4 pix fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits
2.4 pix fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
15.2 mag. Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.0 (SNR ) 11.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.nstcV1JgfK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040134_TTUQ1b1x1_3430333_FVpaXAzU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3136, bad_region=0, passed=27193
Got 27193 stars (including 24022 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27193 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4849 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4793 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4793 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4793 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27193 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4849 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4793 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27193 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4793 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27193 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 4793 stars left (next iteration limit 5272)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits N_match=4793 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.593 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.452 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.444 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.391 n_q1=1003 n_q2=1397 n_q3=1274 n_q4=1119 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.304
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits -region wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.kjbxVfn4EH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040134_TTUQ1b1x1_3430333_FVpaXAzU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3121, bad_region=0, passed=27141
Got 27141 stars (including 23994 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27141 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4852 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4798 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4798 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4798 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27141 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4852 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4799 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27141 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4799 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27141 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 4799 stars left (next iteration limit 5277)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits N_match=4799 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.453 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.562 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.461 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.446 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.384 n_q1=1006 n_q2=1397 n_q3=1273 n_q4=1123 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.242
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -region wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.tP1bD5k1CY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040134_TTUQ1b1x1_3430333_FVpaXAzU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040134_TTUQ1b1x1_3430333_FVpaXAzU/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040134_TTUQ1b1x1_3430333_FVpaXAzU/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040134_TTUQ1b1x1_3430333_FVpaXAzU/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040134_TTUQ1b1x1_3430333_FVpaXAzU/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040134_TTUQ1b1x1_3430333_FVpaXAzU/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040134_TTUQ1b1x1_3430333_FVpaXAzU/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040134_TTUQ1b1x1_3430333_FVpaXAzU/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=617, bad_region=0, passed=10734
Got 10734 stars (including 10110 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10734 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013131 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010504 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4859 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4787 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4787 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4787 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10734 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4860 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4789 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10734 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4789 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10734 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 4789 stars left (next iteration limit 5265)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4789 robust_rms=7.319 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.543 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4789 robust_rms=0.646 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=1.600 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4789 robust_rms=0.555 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.921 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4789 robust_rms_before=1.621 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.444 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.555 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.603 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.921
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.603 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits N_match=4789 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.452 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.618 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.409 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.479 n_q1=1217 n_q2=954 n_q3=1649 n_q4=969 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.366
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040134_TTUQ1b1x1_3430333_FVpaXAzU/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.UF80wjiGn9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040134_TTUQ1b1x1_3430333_FVpaXAzU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040134_TTUQ1b1x1_3430333_FVpaXAzU/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040134_TTUQ1b1x1_3430333_FVpaXAzU/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040134_TTUQ1b1x1_3430333_FVpaXAzU/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040134_TTUQ1b1x1_3430333_FVpaXAzU/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040134_TTUQ1b1x1_3430333_FVpaXAzU/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040134_TTUQ1b1x1_3430333_FVpaXAzU/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040134_TTUQ1b1x1_3430333_FVpaXAzU/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=627, bad_region=1, passed=10999
Got 10999 stars (including 10359 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10999 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013126 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010501 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4862 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4793 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4795 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4793 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10999 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4796 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10999 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4796 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10999 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 4796 stars left (next iteration limit 5272)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4796 robust_rms=8.309 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.258 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4796 robust_rms=0.776 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=1.042 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4796 robust_rms=0.562 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.679 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4796 robust_rms_before=1.554 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.439 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.562 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.589 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.679
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.589 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits N_match=4796 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.433 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.573 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.450 n_q1=1219 n_q2=976 n_q3=1629 n_q4=972 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.324
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040134_TTUQ1b1x1_3430333_FVpaXAzU/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits sigma_overall=0.454 worst_q_ratio=1.304
ref2=Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits sigma_overall=0.453 worst_q_ratio=1.242
new1=fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits sigma_overall=0.452 worst_q_ratio=1.366
new2=fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits sigma_overall=0.433 worst_q_ratio=1.324
reference average sigma_overall=0.4535 worst_q_ratio=1.273
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_astrometric_residuals.png (4793 matched stars from wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.43 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_astrometric_residuals.png (4799 matched stars from wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.43 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0394_astrometric_residuals.png (4789 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.41 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395_astrometric_residuals.png (4796 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.41 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040134_TTUQ1b1x1_3430333_FVpaXAzU/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040134_TTUQ1b1x1_3430333_FVpaXAzU/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31900_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 31900_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:07.41 +32:32:59.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31904_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 31904_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:21.55 +29:29:38.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32020_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 32020_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:12.29 +32:03:13.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16931_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 16931_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:20.99 +28:36:31.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17096_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 17096_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:17.08 +28:29:01.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25384_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 25384_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:48.84 +25:25:24.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08609_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 08609_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:33:16.93 +31:35:28.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Aur-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040134_TTUQ1b1x1_3430333_FVpaXAzU/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040134_TTUQ1b1x1_3430333_FVpaXAzU/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040134_TTUQ1b1x1_3430333_FVpaXAzU/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040134_TTUQ1b1x1_3430333_FVpaXAzU/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:00.478 +29:59:52.02 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits
Image size: 945.4'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:59:46.289 +29:55:41.98 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:00:00.478 +29:59:52.02
Second-epoch image center 05:59:46.289 +29:55:41.98
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0863 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits
Image size: 945.1'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:59:49.483 +29:56:09.97 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:00:00.478 +29:59:52.02
Second-epoch image center 05:59:49.483 +29:56:09.97
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0733 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:59:46.289 +29:55:41.98
Second-epoch second image center 05:59:49.483 +29:56:09.97
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01391 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits &> /tmp/tmp.94Sgw08CF0
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vCKFDrhiXA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040134_TTUQ1b1x1_3430333_FVpaXAzU/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qecKxpUKXF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040134_TTUQ1b1x1_3430333_FVpaXAzU/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040134_TTUQ1b1x1_3430333_FVpaXAzU/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5CfXxsImjF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040134_TTUQ1b1x1_3430333_FVpaXAzU/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 212828 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5594 to 99.6902 deg, Dec +24.3171 to +35.3065 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5594 to 99.6902 deg, Dec 24.3171 to 35.3065 deg
Loaded 17190 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9236 out of 14303 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14303 out of 212828 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.790850
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.790850
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.36
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.43
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.43
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 212828 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5594 to 99.6902 deg, Dec +24.3171 to +35.3065 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5594 to 99.6902 deg, Dec 24.3171 to 35.3065 deg
Loaded 17190 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9236 out of 14303 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14303 out of 212828 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 212641 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5682 to 99.6901 deg, Dec +24.3244 to +35.3140 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5682 to 99.6901 deg, Dec 24.3244 to 35.3140 deg
Loaded 17179 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9281 out of 14295 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14295 out of 212641 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 170 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
1.9 pix Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
2.3 pix fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits
2.4 pix fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
15.4 mag. Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.0 (SNR ) 13.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.94Sgw08CF0 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040134_TTUQ1b1x1_3430333_FVpaXAzU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=1, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=79, blended=32424, bad_region=1, passed=212748
Got 212748 stars (including 179989 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 212748 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4810 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4767 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 212748 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4810 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 212748 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 212748 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 4766 stars left (next iteration limit 5242)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits N_match=4766 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.431 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.566 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.439 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.375 n_q1=1028 n_q2=1362 n_q3=1243 n_q4=1133 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.313
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits -region wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.vCKFDrhiXA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040134_TTUQ1b1x1_3430333_FVpaXAzU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=51, blended=32176, bad_region=4, passed=212590
Got 212590 stars (including 180083 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 212590 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4805 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4766 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 212590 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4805 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 212590 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 212590 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4766 stars left (next iteration limit 5242)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits N_match=4766 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.575 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.419 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.371 n_q1=1026 n_q2=1364 n_q3=1217 n_q4=1159 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.319
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -region wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.qecKxpUKXF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040134_TTUQ1b1x1_3430333_FVpaXAzU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040134_TTUQ1b1x1_3430333_FVpaXAzU/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040134_TTUQ1b1x1_3430333_FVpaXAzU/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040134_TTUQ1b1x1_3430333_FVpaXAzU/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040134_TTUQ1b1x1_3430333_FVpaXAzU/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040134_TTUQ1b1x1_3430333_FVpaXAzU/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040134_TTUQ1b1x1_3430333_FVpaXAzU/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040134_TTUQ1b1x1_3430333_FVpaXAzU/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=5581, bad_region=28, passed=88215
Got 88215 stars (including 82500 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 88215 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013131 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010504 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.0 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4845 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4789 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4789 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4789 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 88215 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.0 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4846 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4792 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 88215 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4792 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 88215 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 4792 stars left (next iteration limit 5267)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4792 robust_rms=7.543 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.309 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4792 robust_rms=0.655 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=1.551 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4792 robust_rms=0.558 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.909 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4792 robust_rms_before=1.617 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.443 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.558 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.585 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.909
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.585 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits N_match=4792 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.445 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.615 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.473 n_q1=1255 n_q2=978 n_q3=1571 n_q4=988 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.384
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040134_TTUQ1b1x1_3430333_FVpaXAzU/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.5CfXxsImjF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040134_TTUQ1b1x1_3430333_FVpaXAzU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040134_TTUQ1b1x1_3430333_FVpaXAzU/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040134_TTUQ1b1x1_3430333_FVpaXAzU/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040134_TTUQ1b1x1_3430333_FVpaXAzU/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040134_TTUQ1b1x1_3430333_FVpaXAzU/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040134_TTUQ1b1x1_3430333_FVpaXAzU/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040134_TTUQ1b1x1_3430333_FVpaXAzU/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040134_TTUQ1b1x1_3430333_FVpaXAzU/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=5481, bad_region=30, passed=86190
Got 86190 stars (including 80560 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 86190 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013126 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010501 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.0 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4849 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4792 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4792 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4792 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 86190 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.0 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4850 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4794 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 86190 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4794 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 86190 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 4794 stars left (next iteration limit 5271)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4794 robust_rms=8.661 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.516 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4794 robust_rms=0.782 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=1.066 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4794 robust_rms=0.563 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.677 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4794 robust_rms_before=1.551 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.441 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.563 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.583 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.677
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.583 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits N_match=4794 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.439 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.556 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.411 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.448 n_q1=1228 n_q2=989 n_q3=1592 n_q4=985 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.268
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040134_TTUQ1b1x1_3430333_FVpaXAzU/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040134_TTUQ1b1x1_3430333_FVpaXAzU/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040134_TTUQ1b1x1_3430333_FVpaXAzU/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:08:55.15 +29:10:57.7: 13.49 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:47:21.56 +32:09:49.3: 13.91 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:45:07.55 +28:01:39.5: 13.60 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:36:38.93 +26:06:33.2: 13.93 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:59:35.85 +30:03:37.9: 13.94 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:16:51.89 +28:54:35.3: 13.57 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:51:04.52 +29:37:38.3: 13.84 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:38:59.94 +31:45:52.8: 14.21 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:31:49.17 +26:08:13.4: 13.61 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:51:04.52 +29:37:38.3: 13.98 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:36:38.93 +26:06:33.2: 13.89 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:08:55.15 +29:10:57.7: 13.51 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:16:51.89 +28:54:35.3: 13.57 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:31:49.17 +26:08:13.4: 13.62 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:47:21.56 +32:09:49.3: 14.01 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:59:35.85 +30:03:37.9: 14.11 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:38:59.94 +31:45:52.8: 14.15 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:45:07.55 +28:01:39.5: 13.59 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.50 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.62 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:08:55.15 +29:10:57.7: ref_mag=13.50 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3759 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:51:04.52 +29:37:38.3: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8563 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.18 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:36:38.93 +26:06:33.2: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7183 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:31:49.17 +26:08:13.4: ref_mag=13.62 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4856 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:16:51.89 +28:54:35.3: ref_mag=13.57 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2799 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:47:21.56 +32:09:49.3: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8308 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:59:35.85 +30:03:37.9: ref_mag=14.02 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7794 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:38:59.94 +31:45:52.8: ref_mag=14.18 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8463 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:45:07.55 +28:01:39.5: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5136 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:30:00.36 +33:25:02.0: 13.55 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:28:07.87 +34:57:54.9: 13.17 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:09:15.45 +34:44:24.3: 13.51 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:47:40.73 +31:30:15.0: 13.29 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:30:00.36 +33:25:02.0: 13.52 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:30:00.36 +33:25:02.0: ref_mag=13.54 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5975 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:45:47.04 +34:15:05.8: 13.24 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:47:46.80 +29:05:00.7: 13.40 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:54:29.33 +27:58:18.7: 13.34 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:09:15.45 +34:44:24.3: 13.48 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:47:40.73 +31:30:15.0: 13.24 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.49 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:28:07.87 +34:57:54.9: 13.16 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:09:15.45 +34:44:24.3: ref_mag=13.49 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0906 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.26 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.16 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:47:40.73 +31:30:15.0: ref_mag=13.26 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3269 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:28:07.87 +34:57:54.9: ref_mag=13.16 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3699 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:45:47.04 +34:15:05.8: 13.30 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:47:46.80 +29:05:00.7: 13.32 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.27 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.36 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:45:47.04 +34:15:05.8: ref_mag=13.27 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2479 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:47:46.80 +29:05:00.7: ref_mag=13.36 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3413 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:54:29.33 +27:58:18.7: 13.30 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.32 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:54:29.33 +27:58:18.7: ref_mag=13.32 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9801 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:00:29.77 +28:43:39.0: 12.71 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:41:11.94 +26:16:29.2: 12.59 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:31:23.30 +25:47:51.0: 10.28 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:00:29.77 +28:43:39.0: 12.69 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.70 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:00:29.77 +28:43:39.0: ref_mag=12.70 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6529 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:41:11.94 +26:16:29.2: 12.56 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.57 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:41:11.94 +26:16:29.2: ref_mag=12.57 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6011 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:44:33.21 +25:41:04.0: 12.13 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:31:23.30 +25:47:51.0: 10.29 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.28 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:31:23.30 +25:47:51.0: ref_mag=10.28 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.8637 delta=-0.58 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:31:57.69 +24:24:30.9: 10.82 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:44:33.21 +25:41:04.0: 12.12 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.12 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:44:33.21 +25:41:04.0: ref_mag=12.12 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0023 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:31:57.69 +24:24:30.9: 10.79 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.80 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:31:57.69 +24:24:30.9: ref_mag=10.80 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.6657 delta=-0.86 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:23:36.45 +24:29:48.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:23:36.45 +24:29:48.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:23:36.45 +24:29:48.1: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:32:50.25 +32:09:35.5: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:31:53.08 +24:25:03.8: 11.36 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:04:01.55 +27:35:17.7: 13.13 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:32:50.25 +32:09:35.5: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:29:08.12 +24:34:15.5: 15.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:31:53.08 +24:25:03.8: 11.33 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:04:01.55 +27:35:17.7: 13.04 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.34 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:31:53.08 +24:25:03.8: ref_mag=11.34 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=12.2101 delta=-0.87 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.08 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:04:01.55 +27:35:17.7: ref_mag=13.08 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8347 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:25:59.49 +28:37:31.8: 13.38 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:31:59.19 +24:31:56.3: 12.16 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:29:08.12 +24:34:15.5: 15.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:25:59.49 +28:37:31.8: 13.34 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.36 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:25:59.49 +28:37:31.8: ref_mag=13.36 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.3321 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:46:13.48 +25:41:23.8: 13.31 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:32:04.89 +24:28:57.0: 11.78 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:31:59.19 +24:31:56.3: 12.13 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.14 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:31:59.19 +24:31:56.3: ref_mag=12.14 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5242 delta=-0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:46:13.48 +25:41:23.8: 13.29 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.30 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:32:04.89 +24:28:57.0: 11.79 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:46:13.48 +25:41:23.8: ref_mag=13.30 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0978 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.78 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:32:04.89 +24:28:57.0: ref_mag=11.78 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3900 delta=-0.61 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:32:09.09 +24:26:22.7: 11.68 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:32:09.09 +24:26:22.7: 11.67 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.67 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:32:09.09 +24:26:22.7: ref_mag=11.67 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4953 delta=-0.82 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:48:04.92 +30:32:10.2: 13.38 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:32:33.27 +24:32:15.4: 12.02 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:48:04.92 +30:32:10.2: 13.34 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.36 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:48:04.92 +30:32:10.2: ref_mag=13.36 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2393 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:32:33.27 +24:32:15.4: 12.00 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.01 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:32:33.27 +24:32:15.4: ref_mag=12.01 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7164 delta=-0.71 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:43:11.24 +32:00:58.4: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:56:30.13 +32:57:04.4: 13.80 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:46:37.00 +32:41:12.0: 13.60 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:56:06.19 +32:08:03.1: 13.37 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:01:27.15 +29:36:13.2: 13.54 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:43:11.24 +32:00:58.4: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:11:14.98 +33:03:58.8: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:41:19.43 +33:51:24.7: 13.57 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:46:37.00 +32:41:12.0: 13.55 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:46:37.00 +32:41:12.0: ref_mag=13.57 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5666 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:56:30.13 +32:57:04.4: 13.86 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:56:06.19 +32:08:03.1: 13.41 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.39 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:56:30.13 +32:57:04.4: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5126 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:56:06.19 +32:08:03.1: ref_mag=13.39 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5490 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:01:27.15 +29:36:13.2: 13.49 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.51 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:01:27.15 +29:36:13.2: ref_mag=13.51 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2440 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:11:14.98 +33:03:58.8: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:41:19.43 +33:51:24.7: 13.61 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.59 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:41:19.43 +33:51:24.7: ref_mag=13.59 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6795 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:15:07.05 +29:17:25.7: 13.16 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:48:30.83 +28:59:17.3: 14.09 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:48:30.83 +28:59:17.3: 14.17 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.13 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:48:30.83 +28:59:17.3: ref_mag=14.13 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8084 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:15:07.05 +29:17:25.7: 13.15 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.16 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:15:07.05 +29:17:25.7: ref_mag=13.16 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2893 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:32:29.74 +24:52:05.9: 12.05 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:32:29.74 +24:52:05.9: 11.99 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.02 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:32:29.74 +24:52:05.9: ref_mag=12.02 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7274 delta=-0.70 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:46:23.33 +32:23:07.7: 12.95 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:46:23.33 +32:23:07.7: 12.93 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.94 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:46:23.33 +32:23:07.7: ref_mag=12.94 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9961 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:06:47.46 +31:49:51.1: 16.07 +/- 0.35 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:06:47.46 +31:49:51.1: 15.17 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.32 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:06:47.46 +31:49:51.1: ref_mag=15.32 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=11.8772 delta=3.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:16:49.72 +29:22:41.9: 14.00 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:16:49.72 +29:22:41.9: 14.04 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:16:49.72 +29:22:41.9: ref_mag=14.02 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.0596 delta=0.96 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out114879.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out243041.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out243122.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out243517.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out243626.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out66314.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 37s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242160_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 242160_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242161_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 242161_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242167_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 242167_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242171_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 242171_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242182_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 242182_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242185_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 242185_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242191_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 242191_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242192_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 242192_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:59.78 +30:16:18.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242194_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 242194_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242199_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 242199_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242207_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 242207_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:14:10.65 +30:44:36.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242208_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 242208_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:07:03.77 +28:40:15.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242212_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 242212_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242214_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 242214_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:56.24 +27:24:27.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242216_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 242216_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242217_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 242217_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:24.49 +25:37:43.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242220_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 242220_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242230_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 242230_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:12.38 +30:49:17.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242238_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 242238_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242240_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 242240_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:57.83 +31:29:40.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242242_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 242242_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:08.19 +34:09:50.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242244_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 242244_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:59:03.21 +26:28:45.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242246_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 242246_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242251_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 242251_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:45.82 +28:44:39.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242254_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 242254_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:03.10 +34:11:14.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242255_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 242255_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242256_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 242256_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:17.14 +34:02:06.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242259_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 242259_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242260_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 242260_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:50:50.67 +32:19:01.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242263_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 242263_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:06.01 +25:42:54.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242267_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 242267_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:26.52 +25:06:03.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242275_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 242275_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242279_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 242279_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:00.85 +27:35:31.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242282_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 242282_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242284_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 242284_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:50:04.20 +24:54:48.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242287_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 242287_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:59.62 +34:57:12.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242294_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 242294_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:32.60 +26:28:02.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242295_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 242295_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:54.17 +25:28:12.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242297_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 242297_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:34.77 +26:14:47.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242301_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 242301_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242302_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 242302_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:21.54 +29:29:38.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242428_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 242428_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:12.30 +32:03:14.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242549_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 242549_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:27.70 +28:29:43.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242555_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 242555_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:52.63 +27:35:11.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242569_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 242569_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:33.47 +28:34:30.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242581_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 242581_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242585_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 242585_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:09.87 +34:55:01.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242594_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 242594_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:20.34 +35:01:45.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242620_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 242620_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:40.70 +34:23:17.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242627_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 242627_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:33.21 +28:37:19.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242652_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 242652_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:01.89 +25:55:17.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242674_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 242674_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242714_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 242714_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:23.40 +28:38:32.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242715_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 242715_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:12:10.45 +32:41:29.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242727_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 242727_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:32.67 +30:30:48.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242750_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 242750_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:36.98 +25:05:45.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242790_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 242790_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:09.84 +24:55:59.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242801_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 242801_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:15.58 +31:22:55.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242805_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 242805_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:05:03.72 +26:04:35.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242859_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 242859_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242900_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 242900_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:06:18.77 +29:32:45.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242910_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 242910_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:11.72 +34:09:30.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242933_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 242933_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:00.54 +26:13:09.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242943_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 242943_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:06:57.03 +26:41:01.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242953_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 242953_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:15.32 +32:06:45.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242961_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 242961_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:14.11 +33:06:40.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242974_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 242974_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:55.32 +28:47:43.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242978_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 242978_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:40:45.43 +27:47:10.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242988_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 242988_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:34.74 +30:30:37.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242993_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 242993_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:17.43 +34:30:08.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242994_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 242994_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:37.71 +34:27:24.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243003_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 243003_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:48.31 +25:47:56.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243004_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 243004_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:30:51.13 +32:48:38.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243012_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 243012_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:49.11 +33:17:09.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243030_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 243030_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:08.08 +27:54:05.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243041_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
Preparing report for the candidate 243041_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243047_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 243047_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:50:50.72 +27:58:19.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243072_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 243072_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243074_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 243074_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:41.17 +33:56:54.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243089_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 243089_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:14.80 +31:57:28.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243094_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 243094_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:24:52.02 +29:43:38.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243103_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 243103_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:38.44 +25:01:22.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243118_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 243118_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:08:32.05 +27:49:35.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243119_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 243119_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243121_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 243121_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:15:11.96 +29:28:59.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243122_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
Preparing report for the candidate 243122_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243126_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 243126_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243133_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 243133_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:07:03.90 +33:02:02.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243144_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 243144_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:02:49.24 +32:38:47.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243162_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 243162_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:08:59.97 +34:55:06.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243168_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 243168_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:47.11 +29:10:28.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243187_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 243187_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243193_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 243193_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243196_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 243196_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:53.05 +28:27:39.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243200_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 243200_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:00.20 +25:58:47.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243207_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 243207_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:43:37.10 +25:25:06.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243215_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 243215_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:08:46.21 +25:37:18.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243225_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 243225_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:56:46.95 +32:30:23.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243227_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 243227_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243237_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 243237_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:51.03 +33:20:48.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243245_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 243245_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243246_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 243246_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:13.55 +25:22:18.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243247_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 243247_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:27:56.71 +29:14:51.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243256_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 243256_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:59:38.24 +32:48:42.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243257_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 243257_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:02.47 +27:17:30.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243263_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 243263_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243266_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 243266_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:04.46 +31:01:16.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243284_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 243284_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:08.43 +34:10:10.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243313_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 243313_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:49.24 +30:55:46.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243318_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 243318_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:35.22 +32:16:32.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243327_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 243327_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:34:00.57 +33:30:54.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243335_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 243335_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:32.91 +32:17:54.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243345_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 243345_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:50.66 +30:45:42.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243350_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 243350_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243354_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 243354_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243373_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 243373_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:22.88 +31:57:49.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243387_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 243387_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:07.30 +28:15:08.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243392_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 243392_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:29.09 +29:37:23.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243399_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 243399_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:00.31 +24:57:32.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243401_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 243401_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:13.61 +32:04:17.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243412_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 243412_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:16.03 +34:30:38.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243420_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 243420_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:40.11 +25:01:55.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243434_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 243434_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:50.15 +31:16:04.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243437_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 243437_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:06:11.31 +27:55:35.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243439_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 243439_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:48.35 +31:10:23.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243443_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 243443_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243446_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 243446_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:22:29.33 +28:08:02.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243461_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 243461_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:40.84 +28:13:14.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243477_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 243477_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:27.27 +27:37:18.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243483_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 243483_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:19.85 +31:18:08.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243500_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 243500_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:59:41.27 +29:59:50.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243517_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
Preparing report for the candidate 243517_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243531_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 243531_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:59:40.33 +32:49:00.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243532_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 243532_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:10.41 +27:03:50.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243540_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 243540_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243549_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 243549_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243557_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 243557_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243559_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 243559_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243604_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 243604_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:08:36.83 +27:09:08.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243626_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
Preparing report for the candidate 243626_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243635_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 243635_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243636_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 243636_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:16:18.37 +30:03:41.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243685_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 243685_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:23:55.92 +32:37:32.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243711_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 243711_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243771_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 243771_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24946_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 24946_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:43:37.01 +33:54:14.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168208_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 168208_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:43.42 +25:40:41.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209157_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 209157_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137801_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 137801_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:03.98 +28:27:30.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156560_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 156560_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:40:49.17 +27:36:16.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111257_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 111257_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:50.11 +29:24:12.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11759_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 11759_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:51.73 +34:35:22.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 226537_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 226537_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115105_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 115105_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:47.39 +29:32:53.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66314_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
Preparing report for the candidate 66314_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89530_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 89530_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:01.66 +30:45:31.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08027_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 08027_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:18:22.94 +34:38:12.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62401_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 62401_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:08:40.03 +32:01:55.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107520_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 107520_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:28.73 +29:51:04.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79766_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 79766_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:20:38.50 +31:03:05.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20812_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 20812_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:33:11.39 +33:40:08.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137469_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 137469_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:17.05 +28:29:01.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158400_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 158400_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:15:28.42 +27:23:46.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 136018_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 136018_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:20.99 +28:36:31.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125198_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 125198_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:52.13 +29:02:15.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63229_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 63229_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:03.04 +32:03:20.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162899_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 162899_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:48.80 +25:25:24.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64657_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 64657_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:33:16.91 +31:35:28.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114879_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
Preparing report for the candidate 114879_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153136_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 153136_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_04-00-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
