######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC=
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK=
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN=
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP=
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION=
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER=
HOME=
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory:
UMa-05-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting UMa-05-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing UMa-05-Q2b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 713031 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 713031 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-02-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0188.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-02-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits_preview.png'
UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-02-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits

renamed 'UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits_preview.png'
UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits

Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 440.9575
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 445.9569
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1113.0056
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 434.4118
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1114.6731
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 432.0865
----------------------------------------------
INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.52407
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.005
INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 21.8099994659424 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 25.8 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-02-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-02-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-02-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-17T00:02:40.3237478' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-17T05:02:40.3237478' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61269.2101889234 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-17T05:02:50.2259235' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61269.2103035301 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 205.712968901394 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 61.9997315470289 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 27.7927777777778 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 327.859722222222 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.13724399437079 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '13 42 51' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+62 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20478 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20478 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 21.8099994659424 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 21.8099994659424 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 10.4 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 38.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 905.69 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 25.8 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 19.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 1.800144 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 1.400112 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-02-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-02-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-02-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/d_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-02-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits :)
Spent 0.761929 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/d_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-02-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-02-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-02-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 21.7000007629395 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 25.8 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-17T00:03:32.9732325' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-17T05:03:32.9732325' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61269.2107982985 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-17T05:03:42.8761009' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61269.2109129168 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 205.712969005839 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 61.9997315674098 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 27.6966666666667 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 327.9 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.14400833168206 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '13 42 51' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+62 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20478 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20478 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 21.7000007629395 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 21.7000007629395 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 10.4 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 38.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 905.69 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 25.8 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 19.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 1.800144 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 1.400112 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/d_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits :)
Spent 0.690453 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/d_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-02-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-02-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits

fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits

Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-02-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-02-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461269.71030466
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-02-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:42:47.980 +62:00:28.61 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-02-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-02-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
Image size: 937.7'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:42:23.065 +61:58:34.49 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 13:42:47.980 +62:00:28.61
Second-epoch image center 13:42:23.065 +61:58:34.49
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0582 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits
Image size: 937.7'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:42:24.855 +61:59:13.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 13:42:47.980 +62:00:28.61
Second-epoch image center 13:42:24.855 +61:59:13.31
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0498 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 13:42:23.065 +61:58:34.49
Second-epoch second image center 13:42:24.855 +61:59:13.31
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01134 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits &> /tmp/tmp.CysB46g8sP
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Zqo7Wg7vVj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-02-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cs7atq0QJb
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-02-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits &> /tmp/tmp.602GUtxZvv
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits and wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits and wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits and wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6503 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 186.6060 to 224.9754 deg, Dec +55.8938 to +67.2617 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 186.6060 to 224.9754 deg, Dec 55.8938 to 67.2617 deg
Loaded 6074 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3959 out of 4068 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4068 out of 6503 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.653700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.653700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.46
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.19
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.19
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6503 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 186.6060 to 224.9754 deg, Dec +55.8938 to +67.2617 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 186.6060 to 224.9754 deg, Dec 55.8938 to 67.2617 deg
Loaded 6074 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3959 out of 4068 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4068 out of 6503 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits (aperture=6.5)
Read 6522 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 186.6066 to 224.9768 deg, Dec +55.8887 to +67.2580 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 186.6066 to 224.9768 deg, Dec 55.8887 to 67.2580 deg
Loaded 6076 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3951 out of 4074 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4074 out of 6522 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits (aperture=6.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
2.4 pix UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
2.3 pix fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-02-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
2.3 pix fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
15.2 mag. UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
14.9 mag. fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-02-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
14.9 mag. fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 11.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.CysB46g8sP (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=380, bad_region=1498, passed=6503
Got 6503 stars (including 4695 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6503 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4581 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4578 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4578 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4578 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5278 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4581 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4578 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5278 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4578 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5278 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4578 stars left (next iteration limit 5035)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits N_match=4578 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.421 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.326 n_q1=1515 n_q2=886 n_q3=1433 n_q4=744 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.185
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits -region wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Zqo7Wg7vVj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=400, bad_region=1501, passed=6522
Got 6522 stars (including 4694 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6522 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4581 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4577 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4577 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4577 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5290 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4581 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4577 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5290 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4577 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5290 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4577 stars left (next iteration limit 5034)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits N_match=4577 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.315 n_q1=1530 n_q2=880 n_q3=1434 n_q4=733 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.191
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits -region wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.cs7atq0QJb (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-02-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-02-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-02-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-02-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-02-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-02-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-02-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-02-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-02-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-02-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-02-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-02-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-02-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-02-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-02-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=280, bad_region=824, passed=4668
Got 4668 stars (including 3593 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-02-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4668 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013024 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010419 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 730 to 788 (Dec 56.1 to 67.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3505 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3502 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3502 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3502 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4008 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 730 to 788 (Dec 56.1 to 67.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3505 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3502 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4008 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3502 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4008 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 3502 stars left (next iteration limit 3852)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3502 robust_rms=6.657 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.202 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3502 robust_rms=0.482 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.577 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3502 robust_rms=0.382 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.404 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3502 robust_rms_before=0.823 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.369 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.382 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.406 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.404
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.406 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-02-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits N_match=3502 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.349 n_q1=1182 n_q2=679 n_q3=1097 n_q4=544 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.073
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-02-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-02-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-02-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-02-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-02-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.602GUtxZvv (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=293, bad_region=817, passed=4673
Got 4673 stars (including 3591 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4673 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013024 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010419 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 730 to 788 (Dec 56.1 to 67.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3500 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3498 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3498 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3498 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4032 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 730 to 788 (Dec 56.1 to 67.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3500 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3498 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4032 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3498 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4032 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 3498 stars left (next iteration limit 3847)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3498 robust_rms=6.601 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.905 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3498 robust_rms=0.462 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.552 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3498 robust_rms=0.366 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.394 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3498 robust_rms_before=0.824 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.356 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.366 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.386 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.394
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.386 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits N_match=3498 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.397 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.369 n_q1=1192 n_q2=671 n_q3=1082 n_q4=553 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.092
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-02-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-02-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-02-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits sigma_overall=0.356 worst_q_ratio=1.185
ref2=UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits sigma_overall=0.366 worst_q_ratio=1.191
new1=fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-02-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits sigma_overall=0.377 worst_q_ratio=1.073
new2=fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits sigma_overall=0.363 worst_q_ratio=1.092
reference average sigma_overall=0.361 worst_q_ratio=1.188
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179_astrometric_residuals.png (4578 matched stars from wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180_astrometric_residuals.png (4577 matched stars from wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-02-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0188_astrometric_residuals.png (3502 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-02-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189_astrometric_residuals.png (3498 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)

Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-02-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-02-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-02-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-02-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-02-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-02-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-02-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:42:47.980 +62:00:28.61 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-02-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-02-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
Image size: 937.7'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:42:23.065 +61:58:34.49 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 13:42:47.980 +62:00:28.61
Second-epoch image center 13:42:23.065 +61:58:34.49
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0582 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits
Image size: 937.7'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:42:24.855 +61:59:13.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 13:42:47.980 +62:00:28.61
Second-epoch image center 13:42:24.855 +61:59:13.31
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0498 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 13:42:23.065 +61:58:34.49
Second-epoch second image center 13:42:24.855 +61:59:13.31
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01134 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Vaa6raEQB5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits &> /tmp/tmp.z589zvK7Ju
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-02-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fbmHwjQLCq
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-02-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits &> /tmp/tmp.eqJCJQUKVZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits and wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits and wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits and wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 33815 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 186.3029 to 225.2621 deg, Dec +55.8938 to +67.2697 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 186.3029 to 225.2621 deg, Dec 55.8938 to 67.2697 deg
Loaded 6170 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3809 out of 4122 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4122 out of 33815 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.529000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.529000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.15
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.38
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.38
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 33815 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 186.3029 to 225.2621 deg, Dec +55.8938 to +67.2697 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 186.3029 to 225.2621 deg, Dec 55.8938 to 67.2697 deg
Loaded 6170 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3809 out of 4122 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4122 out of 33815 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits (aperture=5.0)
Read 33636 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 186.3037 to 225.2618 deg, Dec +55.8888 to +67.2587 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 186.3037 to 225.2618 deg, Dec 55.8888 to 67.2587 deg
Loaded 6169 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3802 out of 4121 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4121 out of 33636 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits (aperture=5.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 17 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
2.2 pix UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
2.1 pix fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-02-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
2.1 pix fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
15.4 mag. UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
15.0 mag. fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-02-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
15.0 mag. fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 14.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.Vaa6raEQB5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=1409, bad_region=6082, passed=33797
Got 33797 stars (including 26535 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33797 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4886 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4882 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29241 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4886 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29241 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29241 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4882 stars left (next iteration limit 5370)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits N_match=4882 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.408 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.311 n_q1=1628 n_q2=986 n_q3=1423 n_q4=845 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.160
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits -region wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.z589zvK7Ju (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=29, blended=1410, bad_region=6001, passed=33607
Got 33607 stars (including 26445 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33607 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4885 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4881 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29097 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4885 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29097 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29097 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4881 stars left (next iteration limit 5369)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits N_match=4881 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.426 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.313 n_q1=1633 n_q2=987 n_q3=1424 n_q4=837 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.180
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits -region wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.fbmHwjQLCq (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-02-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-02-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-02-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-02-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-02-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-02-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-02-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-02-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-02-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-02-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-02-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-02-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-02-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-02-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-02-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=988, bad_region=3487, passed=26906
Got 26906 stars (including 22575 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-02-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 26906 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013024 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010419 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 730 to 788 (Dec 56.0 to 67.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4875 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4871 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24394 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 730 to 788 (Dec 56.0 to 67.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4875 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24394 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24394 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4871 stars left (next iteration limit 5358)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-02-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4871 robust_rms=6.222 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.472 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4871 robust_rms=0.477 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.551 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4871 robust_rms=0.390 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.408 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4871 robust_rms_before=0.809 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.371 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.390 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.400 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.408
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.400 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-02-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits N_match=4871 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.348 n_q1=1684 n_q2=925 n_q3=1514 n_q4=748 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.088
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-02-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-02-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-02-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-02-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-02-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.eqJCJQUKVZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=22, blended=985, bad_region=3414, passed=26704
Got 26704 stars (including 22465 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 26704 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013024 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010419 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 730 to 788 (Dec 56.0 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4871 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4867 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4867 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4867 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24242 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 730 to 788 (Dec 56.0 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4871 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4867 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24242 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4867 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24242 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4867 stars left (next iteration limit 5353)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4867 robust_rms=6.138 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.653 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4867 robust_rms=0.465 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.553 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4867 robust_rms=0.372 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.400 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4867 robust_rms_before=0.807 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.359 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.372 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.394 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.400
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.394 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits N_match=4867 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.407 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.377 n_q1=1696 n_q2=919 n_q3=1505 n_q4=747 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.122
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-02-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-02-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 14:37:41.18 +60:46:03.4: 14.60 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 14:35:10.89 +59:05:38.7: 14.95 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 14:41:59.70 +62:19:38.6: 14.35 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 14:23:56.96 +58:27:28.0: 14.57 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 14:36:43.97 +62:50:45.7: 15.21 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 14:34:07.09 +60:37:18.9: 15.55 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 14:41:25.56 +64:49:54.5: 15.42 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 14:40:25.11 +63:11:33.4: 15.52 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 14:25:14.41 +60:37:27.3: 15.08 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 14:37:52.90 +64:42:51.8: 15.18 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 14:35:10.89 +59:05:38.7: 15.08 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 14:37:41.18 +60:46:03.4: 14.70 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 14:23:56.96 +58:27:28.0: 14.54 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 14:41:59.70 +62:19:38.6: 14.27 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 14:41:25.56 +64:49:54.5: 14.98 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:37:41.18 +60:46:03.4: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.6511 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.01 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 14:36:43.97 +62:50:45.7: 15.34 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.55 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:35:10.89 +59:05:38.7: ref_mag=15.01 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6908 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.31 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:23:56.96 +58:27:28.0: ref_mag=14.55 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.4240 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:41:59.70 +62:19:38.6: ref_mag=14.31 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.4985 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.12 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:41:25.56 +64:49:54.5: ref_mag=15.12 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.8379 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.26 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 14:34:07.09 +60:37:18.9: 15.31 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:36:43.97 +62:50:45.7: ref_mag=15.26 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.7633 delta=0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.40 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:34:07.09 +60:37:18.9: ref_mag=15.40 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.8858 delta=0.52 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 14:40:25.11 +63:11:33.4: 15.37 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.43 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:40:25.11 +63:11:33.4: ref_mag=15.43 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.6697 delta=0.76 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 14:25:14.41 +60:37:27.3: 15.38 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.19 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:25:14.41 +60:37:27.3: ref_mag=15.19 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.9099 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 14:37:52.90 +64:42:51.8: 15.08 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.13 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:37:52.90 +64:42:51.8: ref_mag=15.13 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.9750 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 13:30:05.83 +64:39:17.2: 14.99 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 13:30:05.83 +64:39:17.2: 15.02 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.00 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:30:05.83 +64:39:17.2: ref_mag=15.00 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.9172 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 3s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51867_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189
The candidate 51867_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 17.21091 | 2461269.71091 | 12.83 | 14:30:48.10 +62:45:36.8 | 1443 2441 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits |
**** FOUND 14:30:48.13 +62:45:36.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51887_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189
The candidate 51887_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 17.21091 | 2461269.71091 | 11.42 | 14:21:55.13 +62:15:58.9 | 2013 2837 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits |
**** FOUND 14:21:55.22 +62:15:59.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52082_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189
The candidate 52082_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 17.21091 | 2461269.71091 | 13.71 | 13:45:24.46 +60:49:23.4 | 4574 3899 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits |
**** FOUND 13:45:24.47 +60:49:23.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52087_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189
The candidate 52087_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 17.21091 | 2461269.71091 | 14.12 | 14:24:29.06 +60:16:19.9 | 1646 4008 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits |
**** FOUND 14:24:29.27 +60:16:20.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52119_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189
The candidate 52119_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 17.21091 | 2461269.71091 | 14.18 | 13:57:24.06 +59:58:04.5 | 3665 4393 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits |
**** FOUND 13:57:23.87 +59:58:04.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52140_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189
The candidate 52140_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 17.21091 | 2461269.71091 | 14.26 | 13:39:48.61 +61:56:12.8 | 4974 3223 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits |
**** FOUND 13:39:48.27 +61:56:14.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52145_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189
The candidate 52145_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 08 17.21030 | 2461269.71030 | 14.40 | 14:23:56.85 +58:27:29.5 | 1515 5099 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-02-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 17.21091 | 2461269.71091 | 14.45 | 14:23:57.07 +58:27:26.6 | 1517 5107 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52160_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189
The candidate 52160_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 08 17.21030 | 2461269.71030 | 14.50 | 14:41:59.82 +62:19:38.7 | 0611 2534 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-02-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 17.21091 | 2461269.71091 | 14.50 | 14:41:59.59 +62:19:38.6 | 0613 2541 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52164_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189
The candidate 52164_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 08 17.21030 | 2461269.71030 | 14.62 | 14:37:41.09 +60:46:03.2 | 0718 3530 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-02-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 17.21091 | 2461269.71091 | 14.75 | 14:37:41.26 +60:46:03.6 | 0720 3537 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52218_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189
The candidate 52218_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 08 17.21030 | 2461269.71030 | 14.69 | 14:35:10.85 +59:05:36.8 | 0701 4569 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-02-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 17.21091 | 2461269.71091 | 14.69 | 14:35:10.93 +59:05:40.7 | 0704 4576 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52259_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189
The candidate 52259_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 08 17.21030 | 2461269.71030 | 14.75 | 14:40:25.21 +63:11:34.7 | 0835 2043 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-02-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 17.21091 | 2461269.71091 | 14.63 | 14:40:25.02 +63:11:32.1 | 0837 2050 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52269_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189
The candidate 52269_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 08 17.21030 | 2461269.71030 | 14.85 | 14:34:07.13 +60:37:19.3 | 0963 3669 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-02-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 17.21091 | 2461269.71091 | 14.94 | 14:34:07.05 +60:37:18.5 | 0966 3676 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52274_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189
The candidate 52274_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 08 17.21030 | 2461269.71030 | 14.80 | 14:36:44.11 +62:50:45.9 | 1042 2303 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-02-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 17.21091 | 2461269.71091 | 14.74 | 14:36:43.83 +62:50:45.5 | 1045 2311 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52290_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189
The candidate 52290_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 08 17.21030 | 2461269.71030 | 14.91 | 14:37:52.99 +64:42:53.3 | 1196 1171 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-02-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 17.21091 | 2461269.71091 | 15.12 | 14:37:52.81 +64:42:50.4 | 1198 1179 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52302_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189
The candidate 52302_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 08 17.21030 | 2461269.71030 | 14.87 | 14:41:25.62 +64:49:54.4 | 0984 1051 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-02-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 17.21091 | 2461269.71091 | 14.81 | 14:41:25.51 +64:49:54.6 | 0986 1058 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52311_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189
The candidate 52311_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 08 17.21030 | 2461269.71030 | 14.91 | 14:25:14.57 +60:37:26.2 | 1620 3780 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-02-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 17.21091 | 2461269.71091 | 14.92 | 14:25:14.24 +60:37:28.5 | 1623 3787 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52402_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189
The candidate 52402_fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 08 17.21030 | 2461269.71030 | 14.92 | 13:30:05.81 +64:39:16.7 | 5571 1549 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-02-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0188.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 17.21091 | 2461269.71091 | 14.91 | 13:30:05.85 +64:39:17.6 | 5573 1555 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_004427_TTUQ2b1x1_1832242_ST2vArl8/fd_UMa-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_00-03-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits |
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 4s
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
########### Completed UMa-05-Q2b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
###################################################################################
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461269.71030466 -observatory V36
09:03:53.30 +18:06:03.1 Mercury (-1.4mag)
12:33:31.11 -05:22:38.0 Venus (-4.4mag)
06:15:13.46 +23:42:23.2 Mars (1.3mag)
08:50:58.42 +18:10:48.8 Jupiter (-1.8mag)
00:55:32.31 +03:07:22.3 Saturn (0.5mag)
04:12:38.33 +20:59:17.8 Uranus (5.7mag)
00:15:31.14 +00:08:58.8 Neptune (7.7mag)
20:27:18.06 -23:33:28.7 Pluto (14.5mag)
13:07:15.81 -12:23:51.9 Moon (-9.5mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Aug 17 00:50 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461269.71030466:
08:50:58.51 +18:10:48.3 Io (6.1mag)
08:50:51.21 +18:11:22.3 Europa (6.3mag)
08:51:01.90 +18:10:31.1 Ganymede (5.6mag)
08:50:50.20 +18:11:23.6 Callisto (6.8mag)
08:48:26.48 +18:15:42.1 Himalia (15.7mag)
08:50:59.62 +18:10:43.8 Thebe (16.6mag)
08:48:03.72 +18:12:29.5 Elara (17.7mag)
08:55:07.13 +17:46:13.3 Pasiphae (17.9mag)
08:53:32.91 +18:23:08.3 Carme (19.0mag)
00:55:44.25 +03:07:03.5 Titan (8.4mag)
00:55:35.58 +03:07:04.7 Rhea (9.7mag)
00:56:02.43 +03:08:02.5 Iapetus (11.1mag)
00:55:46.88 +03:06:52.7 Hyperion (14.4mag)
00:54:43.38 +02:59:24.6 Phoebe (16.4mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Aug 17 00:50 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461269.71030466:
19:43:54.58 -17:49:23.0 JWST
17:53:42.41 +33:09:03.3 Chandra
00:12:17.74 +63:15:39.4 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Aug 17 00:50 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461269.71030466 -observatory V36
03:23:18.97 +18:05:00.0 17.6mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist)
18:00:05.35 -34:32:40.8 14.1mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
07:01:59.27 -69:15:36.5 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
06:12:02.35 +33:11:21.7 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
04:08:34.98 +40:59:03.2 17.2mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
22:31:06.40 +30:49:11.4 17.3mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
06:52:11.33 +26:22:48.5 16.8mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
10:29:54.84 +28:04:18.6 17.0mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
09:34:52.81 +05:18:31.0 18.0mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
15:14:18.00 -12:39:09.6 17.9mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
20:59:20.24 +64:52:01.3 17.9mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
15:39:58.56 -13:45:59.9 14.5mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
08:17:55.01 +31:45:40.9 15.5mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:05:55.19 +15:33:11.5 17.8mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
18:52:21.96 +43:25:59.7 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
20:57:13.66 +49:36:24.0 17.5mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS)
05:22:04.68 -12:54:06.2 15.4mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
07:01:46.25 +22:33:04.9 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
10:45:40.63 +20:18:58.1 17.2mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
13:03:50.10 +01:43:48.8 16.9mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
16:05:25.58 +76:53:57.3 16.6mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
03:09:42.10 +46:19:17.5 17.2mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
11:54:21.90 +09:27:11.5 17.4mag A/2026 E1
22:07:38.01 -30:43:33.6 7.0mag 10P/Tempel
11:34:27.72 -03:58:23.3 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
11:25:58.73 +01:42:02.9 17.4mag 63P/Wild
00:52:59.60 -05:50:05.1 15.4mag 65P/Gunn
05:55:38.13 +20:27:33.5 13.7mag 78P/Gehrels
20:29:59.90 -24:30:26.7 17.6mag 84P/Giclas
03:08:34.34 +14:16:41.2 16.8mag 88P/Howell
08:18:17.10 +26:22:38.5 16.3mag 93P/Lovas
04:32:09.84 +20:23:07.3 17.3mag 112P/Urata-Niijima
06:25:59.02 +29:09:17.8 16.1mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
09:39:40.79 +25:03:46.0 14.9mag 123P/West-Hartley
12:01:53.10 -13:41:11.3 17.2mag 124P/Mrkos
05:49:34.67 +21:06:27.3 16.0mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
06:43:37.14 +18:25:09.7 17.9mag 131P/Mueller
00:01:20.56 +03:15:13.1 17.5mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma
03:15:04.89 -18:49:22.9 13.2mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
07:46:43.26 +38:06:12.9 16.0mag 162P/Siding Spring
12:15:04.49 +37:04:37.9 12.0mag 169P/NEAT
02:58:26.15 +09:31:03.7 17.6mag 220P/McNaught
16:46:59.39 -10:45:19.1 17.9mag 235P/LINEAR
20:17:39.98 -52:22:07.6 17.9mag 259P/Garradd
03:48:20.78 +28:50:55.8 15.3mag 260P/McNaught
07:32:14.89 +37:23:25.0 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR
15:13:50.10 +02:08:12.5 17.8mag 391P/Kowalski
09:09:04.15 +17:55:44.9 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.3K Aug 17 00:50 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08
22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17
14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02
12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61
16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09
01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97
21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13
18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06
12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98
13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38
18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63
14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36
20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83
18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86
03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12
18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16
04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02
18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73
17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01
14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46
10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67
14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11
10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58
19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5
02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86
23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47
02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78
18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29
13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72
17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66
11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3
23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15
20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53
19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88
11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82
19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31
17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67
19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52
18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92
19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91
19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81
04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96
13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01
16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07
10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63
14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62
13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09
00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13
11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56
21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14
17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72
14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53
20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4
15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57
23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64
17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15
00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20 AT2026ntk 2026-06-18.09 17.34
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93
23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83
02:02:26.67 +32:04:22.70 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.6 15.52
21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05
17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62
13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24
00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22
14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32
12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69
12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02
10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75
13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58
00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58
01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70 SN 2026obc 2026-06-7.43 15.15
21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90 ASASSN-26dr 2026-06-7.24 16.24
06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00 ASASSN-26ds 2026-06-2.97 15.02
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12
11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63
11:44:33.11 -68:48:32.90 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24.03 8.35
19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28
14:23:56.59 -58:37:47.40 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.59
11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86
00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34
15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44
11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55
13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96
02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37
17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8
16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8
09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63
21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9
14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21
14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89
12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5
13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23
09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51
15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.40 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.07 13.88
10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52
22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2
21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51
16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.15 15.93
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Aug 17 00:50 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2 PNV J00423868+4115582 2026-06-05.1224 19.97Umag
19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7 PNV J19004295-4831017 2026-05-25.0752 14.2mag
09:55:21.28 +69:02:52.6 PNV J09552128+6902526 2026-06-13.933 18.9mag
19:51:21.42 +37:06:40.0 TCP J19512142+3706400 2026-06-17.2942 16.8mag
19:57:03.87 +37:41:46.4 TCP J19570387+3741464 2026-06-18.2638 17.5mag
00:42:32.04 +41:10:28.3 PNV J00423204+4110283 2026-06-26.059 16.6mag
02:19:17.36 +28:57:15.8 TCP J02191736+2857158 2026-07-12.3549 12.5mag
00:44:56.43 +41:57:41.6 PNV J00445643+4157416 2026-07-13.8026 17.98Cmag
00:42:55.36 +41:17:27.0 PNV J00425536+4117270 2026-07-20.1813 17.7mag
20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9 TCP J20354364+6131329 2026-07-20.5443 14.4mag
21:17:31.48 +22:25:51.0 TCP J21173148+2225510 2026-07-23.5577 14.8mag
00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8 PNV J00412404+4049028 2026-07-25.0157 18.7mag
00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6 PNV J00430426+4102286 2026-07-26.1512 20mag
14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0 TCP J14515140+6613240 2026-07-29.2561 13.5mag
00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2 PNV J00430615+4122082 2026-07-30.0085 19.4mag
00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2 PNV J00413323+4110122 2026-08-02.8913 17.1mag
05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-06.4109 11.2mag
22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8 TCP J22571796+4707418 2026-08-09.3289 14.3mag
09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1 PSN J09133817+7628181 2026-08-09.8037 15.4mag
00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6 PNV J00431729+4126486 2026-08-14.0920 16.8mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 190K Aug 17 00:50 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
20:33:52.488 +03:24:38.01 AT 2026wvw 2026-07-23.32 20.8661
00:41:33.169 +41:10:12.40 AT 2026wvv 2026-08-02.89 17.1
23:45:36.740 -03:05:35.56 AT 2026wvu 2026-07-25.60 21.95
22:40:08.792 -06:25:00.39 AT 2026wvt 2026-07-24.51 21.53
18:01:34.940 +35:37:53.90 AT 2026wvs 2026-07-23.31 21.74
23:25:28.465 -20:01:24.81 AT 2026wvr 2026-07-26.54 20.7
23:40:24.824 -24:40:33.31 AT 2026wvq 2026-07-26.54 20.89
21:22:15.890 -02:33:52.37 AT 2026wvp 2026-07-25.44 21.07
22:10:23.762 +16:20:18.77 AT 2026wvo 2026-07-25.45 21.13
23:06:39.906 +05:33:08.21 AT 2026wvn 2026-07-24.57 21.75
00:44:57.801 +25:20:50.30 AT 2026wvm 2026-07-23.55 21.26
23:50:27.739 -03:51:06.21 AT 2026wvl 2026-07-25.58 20.96
00:25:21.084 +26:42:45.70 AT 2026wvk 2026-07-23.55 20.96
23:37:13.087 -06:14:48.44 AT 2026wvj 2026-07-25.59 22.23
00:43:40.407 -30:43:14.55 AT 2026wvi 2026-07-26.58 20.68
22:42:59.067 -07:40:12.15 AT 2026wvh 2026-07-24.50 21.36
22:23:10.327 -02:22:08.97 AT 2026wvg 2026-07-24.49 20.89
23:23:35.914 +24:11:40.27 AT 2026wvf 2026-07-25.53 20.99
00:20:12.928 +32:15:35.83 AT 2026wve 2026-07-23.54 21.08
02:30:56.254 +12:16:48.09 AT 2026wvd 2026-07-27.60 21.14
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 87K Aug 17 00:50 tns_transients_list.txt