This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224809_TTUQ1b1x1_432981_J4rfQy3r
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 17.1579 2461269.6579 11.40 16:12:53.14 -21:56:34.9
352.79006 20.86889 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 6.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.21 Lutetia 0 0 0 11.6 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:12:53.14 -21:56:34.9: 15.32 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:12:53.14 -21:56:34.9: 15.37 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461269.6579,11.40,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260817.1579 11.40CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 17.1579 2461269.6579 12.68 16:21:53.93 -14:10:03.0
0.67255 24.35117 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 7.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.48 Doris 0 1 1 13.0 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:21:53.93 -14:10:03.0: 15.53 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:21:53.93 -14:10:03.0: 15.58 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461269.6579,12.68,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260817.1579 12.68CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 17.1579 2461269.6579 12.88 15:38:53.17 -16:54:01.7
350.50207 30.10831 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 7.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.346 Hermentaria -0 -0 0 12.8 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:38:53.17 -16:54:01.7: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 15:38:53.17 -16:54:01.7: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461269.6579,12.88,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260817.1579 12.88CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 17.1579 2461269.6579 13.12 16:32:38.38 -15:23:38.4
1.39092 21.55698 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 7.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.119 Althaea 0 0 0 13.2 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:32:38.38 -15:23:38.4: 15.36 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:32:38.38 -15:23:38.4: 15.39 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461269.6579,13.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260817.1579 13.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 17.1579 2461269.6579 13.01 16:09:16.86 -21:36:14.4
352.44281 21.71187 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 6.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.24 Themis 0 -0 0 13.0 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:09:16.86 -21:36:14.4: 15.58 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:09:16.86 -21:36:14.4: 15.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461269.6579,13.01,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260817.1579 13.01CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 17.1579 2461269.6579 13.95 15:45:51.00 -13:36:36.6
354.58011 31.27023 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 7.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.269 Justitia 0 1 1 13.7 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:45:51.00 -13:36:36.6: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 15:45:51.00 -13:36:36.6: 15.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461269.6579,13.95,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260817.1579 13.95CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 17.1579 2461269.6579 14.47 15:50:23.73 -14:43:55.4
354.53103 29.69837 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 7.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.559 Nanon 1 1 1 14.4 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:50:23.73 -14:43:55.4: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 15:50:23.73 -14:43:55.4: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461269.6579,14.47,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260817.1579 14.47CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 17.1579 2461269.6579 14.46 16:01:51.35 -18:14:32.8
353.80299 25.28809 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 6.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.364 Isara 0 -0 0 14.7 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:01:51.35 -18:14:32.8: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:01:51.35 -18:14:32.8: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461269.6579,14.46,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260817.1579 14.46CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 17.1579 2461269.6579 14.41 15:42:38.73 -21:27:39.5
347.72319 26.16052 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 7.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.363 Padua 2 -0 2 14.3 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:42:38.73 -21:27:39.5: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 15:42:38.73 -21:27:39.5: 15.63 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461269.6579,14.41,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260817.1579 14.41CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461153.90329036 23.04.2026 09:40:34.287 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
First image: 2461153.90329036 23.04.2026 09:40:34.287 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
Last image: 2461269.65813740 17.08.2026 03:47:33.071 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224809_TTUQ1b1x1_432981_J4rfQy3r/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 16
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.83
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 8299
Objects passed selection criteria: 8290
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 7761
Average stars matched: 7636.25 (98.3926 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 234552 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Aug 16 22:53:31 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461153.90329036 23.04.2026 09:40:34.287 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
First image: 2461153.90329036 23.04.2026 09:40:34.287 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
Last image: 2461269.65813740 17.08.2026 03:47:33.071 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224809_TTUQ1b1x1_432981_J4rfQy3r/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 106
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.53
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 42 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 65661
Objects passed selection criteria: 65538
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 62504.2
Average stars matched: 60274.8 (96.433 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 511560 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Aug 16 22:55:18 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224809_TTUQ1b1x1_432981_J4rfQy3r/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-46-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224809_TTUQ1b1x1_432981_J4rfQy3r/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224809_TTUQ1b1x1_432981_J4rfQy3r/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-46-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224809_TTUQ1b1x1_432981_J4rfQy3r/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461269.65756861
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-46-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:00:00.244 -18:00:10.68 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-46-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-46-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:00:04.030 -18:00:59.70 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:00:00.244 -18:00:10.68
Second-epoch image center 16:00:04.030 -18:00:59.70
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0203 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:00:01.612 -18:01:24.32 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:00:00.244 -18:00:10.68
Second-epoch image center 16:00:01.612 -18:01:24.32
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0212 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:00:04.030 -18:00:59.70
Second-epoch second image center 16:00:01.612 -18:01:24.32
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01177 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fTsBPvLvE2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3FO9HhQTKI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224809_TTUQ1b1x1_432981_J4rfQy3r/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-46-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gDAam3iXn5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224809_TTUQ1b1x1_432981_J4rfQy3r/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-46-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224809_TTUQ1b1x1_432981_J4rfQy3r/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits &> /tmp/tmp.r3jXaiQcQA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224809_TTUQ1b1x1_432981_J4rfQy3r/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits and wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits and wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits and wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits) and catalog (wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 8924 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 231.1932 to 248.3723 deg, Dec -23.5486 to -12.1236 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 231.1932 to 248.3723 deg, Dec -23.5486 to -12.1236 deg
Loaded 6480 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4833 out of 4992 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4992 out of 8924 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.739600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.739600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.83
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.91
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.91
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 8924 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 231.1932 to 248.3723 deg, Dec -23.5486 to -12.1236 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 231.1932 to 248.3723 deg, Dec -23.5486 to -12.1236 deg
Loaded 6480 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4833 out of 4992 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4992 out of 8924 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 8615 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 231.1932 to 248.3722 deg, Dec -23.5485 to -12.1237 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 231.1932 to 248.3722 deg, Dec -23.5485 to -12.1237 deg
Loaded 6479 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4774 out of 4948 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4948 out of 8615 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 13 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
2.2 pix Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
2.2 pix fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-46-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
2.2 pix fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.9 mag. Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
14.9 mag. Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-46-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 11.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.fTsBPvLvE2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224809_TTUQ1b1x1_432981_J4rfQy3r/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits' -> 'wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=501, bad_region=0, passed=8924
Got 8924 stars (including 8411 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8924 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4906 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 4906 stars left (next iteration limit 5396)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits N_match=4906 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.263 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.254 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.277 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.238 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.286 n_q1=1183 n_q2=1225 n_q3=1144 n_q4=1354 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.089
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits -region wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.3FO9HhQTKI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224809_TTUQ1b1x1_432981_J4rfQy3r/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits' -> 'wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=529, bad_region=0, passed=8615
Got 8615 stars (including 8079 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8615 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4906 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8615 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8615 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8615 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4906 stars left (next iteration limit 5396)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits N_match=4906 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.298 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.258 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.301 n_q1=1180 n_q2=1209 n_q3=1165 n_q4=1352 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.149
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits -region wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.gDAam3iXn5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224809_TTUQ1b1x1_432981_J4rfQy3r/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224809_TTUQ1b1x1_432981_J4rfQy3r/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-46-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224809_TTUQ1b1x1_432981_J4rfQy3r/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-46-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224809_TTUQ1b1x1_432981_J4rfQy3r/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-46-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224809_TTUQ1b1x1_432981_J4rfQy3r/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-46-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224809_TTUQ1b1x1_432981_J4rfQy3r/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-46-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224809_TTUQ1b1x1_432981_J4rfQy3r/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-46-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-46-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-46-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-46-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-46-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-46-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-46-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-46-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224809_TTUQ1b1x1_432981_J4rfQy3r/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-46-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-46-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=402, bad_region=0, passed=6852
Got 6852 stars (including 6437 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-46-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6852 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4921 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4897 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6852 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4921 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6852 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6852 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4897 stars left (next iteration limit 5386)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4897 robust_rms=8.895 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.932 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4897 robust_rms=0.394 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.435 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4897 robust_rms=0.316 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.336 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4897 robust_rms_before=0.851 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.328 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.316 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.349 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.336
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.349 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-46-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits N_match=4897 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.338 n_q1=1230 n_q2=1223 n_q3=1154 n_q4=1290 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.044
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-46-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-46-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224809_TTUQ1b1x1_432981_J4rfQy3r/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-46-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits -region wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-46-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-46-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.r3jXaiQcQA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224809_TTUQ1b1x1_432981_J4rfQy3r/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224809_TTUQ1b1x1_432981_J4rfQy3r/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224809_TTUQ1b1x1_432981_J4rfQy3r/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224809_TTUQ1b1x1_432981_J4rfQy3r/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224809_TTUQ1b1x1_432981_J4rfQy3r/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224809_TTUQ1b1x1_432981_J4rfQy3r/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224809_TTUQ1b1x1_432981_J4rfQy3r/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224809_TTUQ1b1x1_432981_J4rfQy3r/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=387, bad_region=0, passed=6799
Got 6799 stars (including 6402 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6799 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4922 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4898 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6799 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4922 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6799 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6799 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4898 stars left (next iteration limit 5387)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4898 robust_rms=8.938 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.680 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4898 robust_rms=0.412 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.439 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4898 robust_rms=0.327 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.341 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4898 robust_rms_before=0.846 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.333 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.327 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.347 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.341
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.347 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits N_match=4898 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.324 n_q1=1221 n_q2=1236 n_q3=1158 n_q4=1283 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.083
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224809_TTUQ1b1x1_432981_J4rfQy3r/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits -region wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-46-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-46-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-46-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits sigma_overall=0.263 worst_q_ratio=1.089
ref2=Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits sigma_overall=0.298 worst_q_ratio=1.149
new1=fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-46-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits sigma_overall=0.341 worst_q_ratio=1.044
new2=fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits sigma_overall=0.341 worst_q_ratio=1.083
reference average sigma_overall=0.2805 worst_q_ratio=1.119
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264_astrometric_residuals.png (4906 matched stars from wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.23 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265_astrometric_residuals.png (4906 matched stars from wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-46-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092_astrometric_residuals.png (4897 matched stars from wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-46-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093_astrometric_residuals.png (4898 matched stars from wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-46-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-46-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224809_TTUQ1b1x1_432981_J4rfQy3r/wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-46-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224809_TTUQ1b1x1_432981_J4rfQy3r/wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Lib-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:58:05.56 -13:05:04.3: 11.94 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:55:35.55 -17:15:01.3: 11.84 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:12:53.14 -21:56:34.9: 15.32 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:16:58.96 -14:57:24.5: 12.32 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 15:55:35.55 -17:15:01.3: 11.84 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:12:53.14 -21:56:34.9: 15.37 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 15:58:05.56 -13:05:04.3: 12.00 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.84 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.97 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:55:35.55 -17:15:01.3: ref_mag=11.84 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8213 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:58:05.56 -13:05:04.3: ref_mag=11.97 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0154 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:16:58.96 -14:57:24.5: 12.37 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.35 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:16:58.96 -14:57:24.5: ref_mag=12.35 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0559 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20442.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20439_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 20439_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:29:26.07 -19:20:51.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20440_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 20440_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:07:39.86 -23:14:52.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20441_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 20441_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:08:31.96 -21:31:50.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20442_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
Preparing report for the candidate 20442_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20455_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 20455_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:11:45.78 -20:08:13.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20456_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 20456_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:53:58.92 -18:30:17.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20457_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 20457_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:14:21.09 -18:41:11.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20458_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 20458_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20460_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 20460_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:11:31.35 -18:38:26.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20466_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 20466_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20469_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 20469_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20470_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 20470_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:42:00.04 -20:46:45.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04477_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 04477_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:56:23.72 -18:18:15.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 10s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Lib-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
16:12:53.14 -21:56:34.9
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224809_TTUQ1b1x1_432981_J4rfQy3r/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-46-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224809_TTUQ1b1x1_432981_J4rfQy3r/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224809_TTUQ1b1x1_432981_J4rfQy3r/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-46-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224809_TTUQ1b1x1_432981_J4rfQy3r/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-46-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-46-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:00:00.244 -18:00:10.68 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-46-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-46-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:00:04.030 -18:00:59.70 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:00:00.244 -18:00:10.68
Second-epoch image center 16:00:04.030 -18:00:59.70
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0203 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:00:01.612 -18:01:24.32 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:00:00.244 -18:00:10.68
Second-epoch image center 16:00:01.612 -18:01:24.32
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0212 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:00:04.030 -18:00:59.70
Second-epoch second image center 16:00:01.612 -18:01:24.32
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01177 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits &> /tmp/tmp.tmWqezkXmc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits &> /tmp/tmp.D3jTev6Ctx
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224809_TTUQ1b1x1_432981_J4rfQy3r/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-46-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits &> /tmp/tmp.q4zK1mZya6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224809_TTUQ1b1x1_432981_J4rfQy3r/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-46-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224809_TTUQ1b1x1_432981_J4rfQy3r/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cnvcHDOoBe
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224809_TTUQ1b1x1_432981_J4rfQy3r/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits and wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits and wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits and wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits) and catalog (wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 67289 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 231.1619 to 248.4183 deg, Dec -23.6142 to -12.1028 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 231.1619 to 248.4183 deg, Dec -23.6142 to -12.1028 deg
Loaded 6545 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4699 out of 5213 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5213 out of 67289 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.610200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.610200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.53
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.08
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.08
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 67289 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 231.1619 to 248.4183 deg, Dec -23.6142 to -12.1028 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 231.1619 to 248.4183 deg, Dec -23.6142 to -12.1028 deg
Loaded 6545 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4699 out of 5213 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5213 out of 67289 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 69473 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 231.1615 to 248.4178 deg, Dec -23.6068 to -12.1031 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 231.1615 to 248.4178 deg, Dec -23.6068 to -12.1031 deg
Loaded 6543 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4678 out of 5218 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5218 out of 69473 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 99 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
2.0 pix Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
2.0 pix fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-46-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
2.0 pix fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
15.1 mag. Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-46-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 14.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.tmWqezkXmc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224809_TTUQ1b1x1_432981_J4rfQy3r/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits' -> 'wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=3233, bad_region=14, passed=67276
Got 67276 stars (including 63934 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 67276 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 331 to 391 (Dec -23.6 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4914 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 67267 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 331 to 391 (Dec -23.6 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 67267 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 67267 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 4914 stars left (next iteration limit 5405)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits N_match=4914 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.264 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.243 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.263 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.245 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.288 n_q1=1144 n_q2=1259 n_q3=1159 n_q4=1352 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.092
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits -region wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.D3jTev6Ctx (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224809_TTUQ1b1x1_432981_J4rfQy3r/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits' -> 'wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=3361, bad_region=20, passed=69459
Got 69459 stars (including 65977 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 69459 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 331 to 391 (Dec -23.6 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4915 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69451 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 331 to 391 (Dec -23.6 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69451 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69451 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4915 stars left (next iteration limit 5406)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits N_match=4915 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.292 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.285 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.323 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.258 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.292 n_q1=1159 n_q2=1234 n_q3=1164 n_q4=1358 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.106
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits -region wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.q4zK1mZya6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224809_TTUQ1b1x1_432981_J4rfQy3r/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224809_TTUQ1b1x1_432981_J4rfQy3r/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-46-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224809_TTUQ1b1x1_432981_J4rfQy3r/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-46-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224809_TTUQ1b1x1_432981_J4rfQy3r/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-46-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224809_TTUQ1b1x1_432981_J4rfQy3r/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-46-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224809_TTUQ1b1x1_432981_J4rfQy3r/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-46-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224809_TTUQ1b1x1_432981_J4rfQy3r/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-46-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-46-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-46-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-46-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-46-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-46-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-46-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-46-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224809_TTUQ1b1x1_432981_J4rfQy3r/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-46-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-46-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=2331, bad_region=3, passed=57418
Got 57418 stars (including 54988 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-46-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 57418 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.6 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4905 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 57413 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.6 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 57413 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 57413 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4905 stars left (next iteration limit 5395)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-46-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4905 robust_rms=8.952 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.097 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4905 robust_rms=0.389 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.423 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4905 robust_rms=0.311 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.323 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4905 robust_rms_before=0.853 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.325 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.311 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.340 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.323
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.340 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-46-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits N_match=4905 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.330 n_q1=1217 n_q2=1270 n_q3=1140 n_q4=1278 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.039
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-46-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-46-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224809_TTUQ1b1x1_432981_J4rfQy3r/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-46-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits -region wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-46-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-46-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.cnvcHDOoBe (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224809_TTUQ1b1x1_432981_J4rfQy3r/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224809_TTUQ1b1x1_432981_J4rfQy3r/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224809_TTUQ1b1x1_432981_J4rfQy3r/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224809_TTUQ1b1x1_432981_J4rfQy3r/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224809_TTUQ1b1x1_432981_J4rfQy3r/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224809_TTUQ1b1x1_432981_J4rfQy3r/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224809_TTUQ1b1x1_432981_J4rfQy3r/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224809_TTUQ1b1x1_432981_J4rfQy3r/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=2243, bad_region=9, passed=57231
Got 57231 stars (including 54896 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 57231 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.6 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4925 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4905 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 57229 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.6 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4925 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 57229 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 57229 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4905 stars left (next iteration limit 5395)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4905 robust_rms=8.941 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.746 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4905 robust_rms=0.404 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.423 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4905 robust_rms=0.321 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.336 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4905 robust_rms_before=0.848 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.330 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.321 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.342 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.336
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.342 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits N_match=4905 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.321 n_q1=1229 n_q2=1261 n_q3=1132 n_q4=1283 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.049
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224809_TTUQ1b1x1_432981_J4rfQy3r/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits -region wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-46-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224809_TTUQ1b1x1_432981_J4rfQy3r/wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-46-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224809_TTUQ1b1x1_432981_J4rfQy3r/wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Lib-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:52:05.92 -18:01:39.9: 13.90 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:50:38.28 -14:24:33.9: 14.15 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:04:24.08 -15:36:29.2: 14.03 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:56:35.21 -19:55:02.8: 13.93 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:09:13.49 -19:37:12.4: 14.08 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:30:52.16 -13:54:01.4: 14.04 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:21:36.43 -21:25:50.2: 14.09 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:48:57.98 -18:31:31.2: 14.47 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:17:08.45 -17:23:24.3: 14.35 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:09:13.49 -19:37:12.4: 14.21 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 15:56:35.21 -19:55:02.8: 13.83 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.14 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 15:48:57.98 -18:31:31.2: 14.46 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:09:13.49 -19:37:12.4: ref_mag=14.14 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.3479 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:56:35.21 -19:55:02.8: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1308 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.47 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:48:57.98 -18:31:31.2: ref_mag=14.47 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.4169 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 15:50:38.28 -14:24:33.9: 14.00 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.06 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:50:38.28 -14:24:33.9: ref_mag=14.06 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2606 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 15:52:05.92 -18:01:39.9: 13.95 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:30:52.16 -13:54:01.4: 14.25 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:04:24.08 -15:36:29.2: 13.87 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:21:36.43 -21:25:50.2: 14.13 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.92 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:52:05.92 -18:01:39.9: ref_mag=13.92 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1610 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.13 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:30:52.16 -13:54:01.4: ref_mag=14.13 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.2431 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.11 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:17:08.45 -17:23:24.3: 14.44 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:21:36.43 -21:25:50.2: ref_mag=14.11 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.2058 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.39 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:17:08.45 -17:23:24.3: ref_mag=14.39 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.4057 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:54:01.33 -18:52:59.0: 13.95 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:04:24.08 -15:36:29.2: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2766 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 15:54:01.33 -18:52:59.0: 14.04 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.99 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:54:01.33 -18:52:59.0: ref_mag=13.99 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0563 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:07:32.25 -14:06:20.0: 13.87 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:57:00.08 -14:46:44.3: 13.81 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:14:31.57 -20:40:38.9: 13.55 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:17:23.55 -13:17:02.1: 13.83 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:56:10.96 -21:51:12.6: 13.52 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:14:45.71 -21:17:00.1: 13.35 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:18:11.31 -16:51:22.6: 13.49 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:06:42.76 -22:48:30.3: 13.51 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:29:35.82 -16:00:46.1: 13.58 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:07:32.25 -14:06:20.0: 14.02 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 15:57:00.08 -14:46:44.3: 13.83 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.94 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:07:32.25 -14:06:20.0: ref_mag=13.94 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9900 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.82 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:57:00.08 -14:46:44.3: ref_mag=13.82 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9632 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:44:25.53 -21:18:59.2: 13.06 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:14:31.57 -20:40:38.9: 13.45 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 15:56:10.96 -21:51:12.6: 13.59 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:18:11.31 -16:51:22.6: 13.62 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.50 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:14:31.57 -20:40:38.9: ref_mag=13.50 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5801 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.56 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.55 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:56:10.96 -21:51:12.6: ref_mag=13.56 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6719 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:17:23.55 -13:17:02.1: 13.94 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:18:11.31 -16:51:22.6: ref_mag=13.55 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7603 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:17:23.55 -13:17:02.1: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1649 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:14:45.71 -21:17:00.1: 13.38 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.37 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:06:42.76 -22:48:30.3: 13.59 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:14:45.71 -21:17:00.1: ref_mag=13.37 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3788 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.55 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:06:42.76 -22:48:30.3: ref_mag=13.55 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5858 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 15:29:35.82 -16:00:46.1: 13.62 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:29:35.82 -16:00:46.1: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6653 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 15:44:25.53 -21:18:59.2: 13.14 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.10 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:44:25.53 -21:18:59.2: ref_mag=13.10 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3108 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:14:52.19 -14:51:51.0: 12.57 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:57:58.11 -14:59:06.2: 11.47 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:17:05.97 -15:11:52.4: 11.95 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:34:50.49 -14:42:43.2: 12.41 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:20:37.28 -16:14:40.7: 11.64 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:14:52.19 -14:51:51.0: 12.59 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.58 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:14:52.19 -14:51:51.0: ref_mag=12.58 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8810 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 15:57:58.11 -14:59:06.2: 11.51 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.49 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:57:58.11 -14:59:06.2: ref_mag=11.49 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.6243 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 15:34:50.49 -14:42:43.2: 12.44 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:17:05.97 -15:11:52.4: 11.98 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.42 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:34:50.49 -14:42:43.2: ref_mag=12.42 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6518 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.97 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:17:05.97 -15:11:52.4: ref_mag=11.97 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2386 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:20:37.28 -16:14:40.7: 11.67 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.66 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:20:37.28 -16:14:40.7: ref_mag=11.66 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8845 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:21:53.93 -14:10:03.0: 15.53 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:21:53.93 -14:10:03.0: 15.58 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:31:34.10 -17:42:50.6: 13.56 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:32:38.38 -15:23:38.4: 15.36 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:52:54.82 -13:16:29.9: 13.03 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:38:53.17 -16:54:01.7: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:17:54.35 -13:26:51.2: 13.04 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:09:16.86 -21:36:14.4: 15.58 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:41:56.46 -19:26:44.6: 13.38 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 15:38:53.17 -16:54:01.7: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:17:54.35 -13:26:51.2: 13.06 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:11:45.30 -19:05:46.4: 14.87 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.05 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:17:54.35 -13:26:51.2: ref_mag=13.05 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1207 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:09:16.86 -21:36:14.4: 15.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:32:38.38 -15:23:38.4: 15.39 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 15:52:54.82 -13:16:29.9: 13.08 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:31:34.10 -17:42:50.6: 13.40 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.05 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:52:54.82 -13:16:29.9: ref_mag=13.05 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3343 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:31:34.10 -17:42:50.6: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.4292 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 15:41:56.46 -19:26:44.6: 13.38 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.38 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:41:56.46 -19:26:44.6: ref_mag=13.38 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4575 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:11:45.30 -19:05:46.4: 14.79 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.83 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 16:11:45.30 -19:05:46.4: ref_mag=14.83 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.8957 delta=0.93 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:54:23.12 -20:37:56.0: 13.77 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:45:51.00 -13:36:36.6: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:32:11.91 -17:56:14.6: 14.45 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:31:48.69 -18:06:38.1: 14.83 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:43:40.00 -12:42:41.6: 13.77 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 15:54:23.12 -20:37:56.0: 13.75 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 15:45:51.00 -13:36:36.6: 15.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:54:23.12 -20:37:56.0: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9038 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:31:48.69 -18:06:38.1: 14.32 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.47 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:31:48.69 -18:06:38.1: ref_mag=14.47 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.1868 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:32:11.91 -17:56:14.6: 14.27 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.35 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:32:11.91 -17:56:14.6: ref_mag=14.35 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.1209 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 15:43:40.00 -12:42:41.6: 13.98 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.86 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:43:40.00 -12:42:41.6: ref_mag=13.86 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9293 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:27:42.37 -15:58:06.2: 14.39 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:27:12.65 -13:46:45.2: 14.56 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:27:42.37 -15:58:06.2: 14.35 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.37 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:27:42.37 -15:58:06.2: ref_mag=14.37 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.1823 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:11:07.46 -19:45:11.6: 14.36 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:31:53.01 -20:55:11.4: 14.47 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:15:11.67 -22:24:58.3: 14.63 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:11:07.46 -19:45:11.6: 14.45 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:27:12.65 -13:46:45.2: 14.26 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.40 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:11:07.46 -19:45:11.6: ref_mag=14.40 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.2928 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.37 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:27:12.65 -13:46:45.2: ref_mag=14.37 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.2831 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:31:53.01 -20:55:11.4: 14.57 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.52 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:31:53.01 -20:55:11.4: ref_mag=14.52 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.2617 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:15:11.67 -22:24:58.3: 14.51 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.56 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:15:11.67 -22:24:58.3: ref_mag=14.56 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.2542 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:12:31.36 -16:03:21.8: 14.54 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:13:23.60 -13:46:36.7: 14.27 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:12:31.36 -16:03:21.8: 14.56 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:31:14.78 -23:22:34.8: 14.65 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.55 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:12:31.36 -16:03:21.8: ref_mag=14.55 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.3785 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:12:33.51 -17:47:26.7: 14.28 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:15:05.80 -14:57:04.8: 14.49 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:12:33.51 -17:47:26.7: 14.45 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:13:23.60 -13:46:36.7: 14.32 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.36 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:12:33.51 -17:47:26.7: ref_mag=14.36 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.4211 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.29 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:13:23.60 -13:46:36.7: ref_mag=14.29 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.2654 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:31:14.78 -23:22:34.8: 14.54 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.59 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:31:14.78 -23:22:34.8: ref_mag=14.59 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.1994 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:15:05.80 -14:57:04.8: 14.68 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.57 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:15:05.80 -14:57:04.8: ref_mag=14.57 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.4649 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:48:00.69 -22:13:42.4: 14.79 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 15:48:00.69 -22:13:42.4: 14.68 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:25:54.20 -13:46:20.8: 14.43 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.72 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:48:00.69 -22:13:42.4: ref_mag=14.72 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3070 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:16:16.75 -14:48:34.9: 14.89 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:15:46.46 -13:51:31.5: 15.16 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:25:54.20 -13:46:20.8: 14.41 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:26:25.82 -13:59:18.1: 14.78 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.42 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:25:54.20 -13:46:20.8: ref_mag=14.42 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4050 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:16:16.75 -14:48:34.9: 14.77 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.82 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:16:16.75 -14:48:34.9: ref_mag=14.82 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5582 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:15:46.46 -13:51:31.5: 14.88 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.98 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:15:46.46 -13:51:31.5: ref_mag=14.98 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.4403 delta=0.54 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:26:25.82 -13:59:18.1: 14.99 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.87 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:26:25.82 -13:59:18.1: ref_mag=14.87 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.4968 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:22:52.87 -15:35:43.8: 15.31 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:22:52.87 -15:35:43.8: 14.88 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.00 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:22:52.87 -15:35:43.8: ref_mag=15.00 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.5235 delta=0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:02:00.30 -15:19:32.3: 14.37 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:19:46.79 -14:10:14.2: 14.83 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:54:32.44 -21:53:37.6: 14.83 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:19:46.79 -14:10:14.2: 14.95 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.88 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:02:00.30 -15:19:32.3: 14.45 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:19:46.79 -14:10:14.2: ref_mag=14.88 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.4698 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:29:54.13 -13:25:16.8: 14.76 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.41 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:02:00.30 -15:19:32.3: ref_mag=14.41 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.4869 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 15:54:32.44 -21:53:37.6: 14.96 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:50:23.73 -14:43:55.4: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.89 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:54:32.44 -21:53:37.6: ref_mag=14.89 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.4446 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:29:54.13 -13:25:16.8: 14.64 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:29:54.13 -13:25:16.8: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5342 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 15:50:23.73 -14:43:55.4: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:49:22.19 -19:40:05.5: 14.56 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 15:49:22.19 -19:40:05.5: 14.70 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:04:21.10 -22:45:15.7: 14.60 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:13:46.26 -14:49:34.4: 15.20 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:49:22.19 -19:40:05.5: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.4740 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:59:29.46 -13:17:36.0: 15.50 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:10:14.12 -18:09:56.6: 14.41 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:43:17.03 -13:29:52.0: 14.84 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:56:44.31 -17:17:42.0: 14.93 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:04:21.10 -22:45:15.7: 14.54 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:13:46.26 -14:49:34.4: 14.82 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.57 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:04:21.10 -22:45:15.7: ref_mag=14.57 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4478 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:57:50.54 -22:47:22.6: 14.31 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.95 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:13:46.26 -14:49:34.4: ref_mag=14.95 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.6063 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:10:14.12 -18:09:56.6: 14.72 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.53 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:10:14.12 -18:09:56.6: ref_mag=14.53 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6019 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 15:59:29.46 -13:17:36.0: 14.74 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.88 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:59:29.46 -13:17:36.0: ref_mag=14.88 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6295 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 15:43:17.03 -13:29:52.0: 14.87 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:43:17.03 -13:29:52.0: ref_mag=14.85 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5446 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 15:56:44.31 -17:17:42.0: 15.26 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.05 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:56:44.31 -17:17:42.0: ref_mag=15.05 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5540 delta=0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 15:57:50.54 -22:47:22.6: 14.49 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.39 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:57:50.54 -22:47:22.6: ref_mag=14.39 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.3495 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:56:15.81 -13:41:37.9: 14.60 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:41:41.77 -12:51:03.7: 14.85 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 15:56:15.81 -13:41:37.9: 14.62 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:42:38.73 -21:27:39.5: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.61 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:56:15.81 -13:41:37.9: ref_mag=14.61 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.5692 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:04:52.29 -20:37:50.5: 14.89 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:02:27.75 -20:54:16.9: 14.72 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:01:51.35 -18:14:32.8: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 15:41:41.77 -12:51:03.7: 15.16 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.97 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:41:41.77 -12:51:03.7: ref_mag=14.97 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.5411 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:06:00.58 -20:56:01.6: 14.63 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 15:42:38.73 -21:27:39.5: 15.63 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:06:00.58 -20:56:01.6: 14.65 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:04:52.29 -20:37:50.5: 15.05 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:02:27.75 -20:54:16.9: 14.85 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.64 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.96 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:06:00.58 -20:56:01.6: ref_mag=14.64 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4988 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:04:52.29 -20:37:50.5: ref_mag=14.96 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6370 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:02:27.75 -20:54:16.9: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5565 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:01:51.35 -18:14:32.8: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out84657.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out84557.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out84568.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out84577.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out84578.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out84698.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out84866.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out84912.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out84913.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 26s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 7s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84411_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 84411_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84421_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 84421_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84427_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 84427_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84440_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 84440_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84446_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 84446_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84447_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 84447_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84448_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 84448_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84450_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 84450_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84453_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 84453_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84455_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 84455_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:32:24.30 -21:53:25.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84457_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 84457_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84458_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 84458_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84460_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 84460_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84463_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 84463_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84464_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 84464_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84465_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 84465_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84466_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 84466_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84472_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 84472_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84475_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 84475_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84480_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 84480_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84484_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 84484_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84486_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 84486_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:15:26.41 -22:58:23.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84489_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 84489_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:35:05.50 -21:08:21.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84491_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 84491_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84492_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 84492_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84493_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 84493_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:23:01.55 -21:14:45.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84495_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 84495_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84497_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 84497_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84499_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 84499_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84500_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 84500_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:38:09.60 -16:32:40.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84515_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 84515_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:07:39.87 -23:14:52.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84516_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 84516_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:12:53.14 -21:56:34.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84525_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 84525_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:11:45.78 -20:08:13.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84528_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 84528_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:14:21.08 -18:41:11.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84529_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 84529_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:53:58.93 -18:30:17.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84543_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 84543_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:19:24.57 -22:21:19.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84550_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 84550_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:11:59.89 -17:03:16.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84557_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
Preparing report for the candidate 84557_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84560_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 84560_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:07:56.19 -18:59:49.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84568_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
Preparing report for the candidate 84568_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84569_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 84569_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:26:46.50 -20:01:11.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84577_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
Preparing report for the candidate 84577_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84578_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
Preparing report for the candidate 84578_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84584_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 84584_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84597_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 84597_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84603_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 84603_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84616_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 84616_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:28:10.25 -16:41:40.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84624_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 84624_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84657_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 84657_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:11:45.30 -19:05:46.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.93, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.91)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.594 6245859811142980864 242.93864805776 -19.09550824310 12.2594 10.5092 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.594#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84689_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 84689_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:05:30.87 -19:50:32.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84693_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 84693_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84698_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
Preparing report for the candidate 84698_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84699_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 84699_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84703_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 84703_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84712_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 84712_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84716_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 84716_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84723_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 84723_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84730_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 84730_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84739_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 84739_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84746_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 84746_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84747_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 84747_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84750_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 84750_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84763_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 84763_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84772_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 84772_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84780_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 84780_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84786_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 84786_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84801_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 84801_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84802_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 84802_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84820_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 84820_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84826_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 84826_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84846_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 84846_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84851_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 84851_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84854_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 84854_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84858_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 84858_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84859_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 84859_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84866_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
Preparing report for the candidate 84866_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84873_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 84873_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84875_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 84875_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84878_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 84878_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84879_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 84879_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84881_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 84881_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84882_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 84882_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84885_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 84885_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84889_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 84889_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84892_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 84892_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84904_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 84904_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84905_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 84905_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84912_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
Preparing report for the candidate 84912_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84913_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
Preparing report for the candidate 84913_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84923_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 84923_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84944_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 84944_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 44712_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 44712_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:58:15.64 -22:44:42.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55365_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 55365_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:08:31.96 -21:31:50.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23970_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 23970_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:10:44.99 -16:36:03.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 41514_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 41514_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:29:26.05 -19:20:51.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 38348_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 38348_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:11:31.35 -18:38:26.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62118_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 62118_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (41.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37373_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 37373_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:56:23.72 -18:18:15.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28887_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 28887_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-47-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
