This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_223119_TTUQ1b1x1_47585_FKYBSWcH
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 17.1460 2461269.6460 12.26 15:25:33.48 -13:18:05.4
350.61688 34.93406 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 10.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.92 Undina 0 0 0 12.6 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 15:25:33.48 -13:18:05.4: 15.50 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 15:25:33.48 -13:18:05.4: 15.55 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461269.6460,12.26,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260817.1460 12.26CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 17.1460 2461269.6460 12.80 15:38:52.75 -16:53:58.4
350.50139 30.11013 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.5" and 10.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.346 Hermentaria 1 -0 1 12.8 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 15:38:52.75 -16:53:58.4: 15.29 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 15:38:52.75 -16:53:58.4: 15.31 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461269.6460,12.80,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260817.1460 12.80CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 17.1460 2461269.6460 13.73 15:19:53.54 -14:52:13.5
348.09675 34.67513 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 10.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.776 Berbericia 1 1 1 13.7 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 15:19:53.54 -14:52:13.5: 15.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 15:19:53.54 -14:52:13.5: 15.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461269.6460,13.73,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260817.1460 13.73CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 17.1460 2461269.6460 14.21 15:27:13.62 -16:07:02.1
348.70801 32.57328 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 10.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.563 Suleika -0 -0 0 14.5 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 15:27:13.62 -16:07:02.1: 15.52 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 15:27:13.62 -16:07:02.1: 15.55 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461269.6460,14.21,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260817.1460 14.21CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461168.78800611 08.05.2026 06:54:33.728 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits
First image: 2461168.78800611 08.05.2026 06:54:33.728 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits
Last image: 2461269.64644813 17.08.2026 03:30:43.118 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_223119_TTUQ1b1x1_47585_FKYBSWcH/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 8
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.92
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 7 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 8062
Objects passed selection criteria: 8054
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6882.75
Average stars matched: 6742.5 (97.9623 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 234048 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Aug 16 22:41:51 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461168.78800611 08.05.2026 06:54:33.728 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits
First image: 2461168.78800611 08.05.2026 06:54:33.728 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits
Last image: 2461269.64644813 17.08.2026 03:30:43.118 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_223119_TTUQ1b1x1_47585_FKYBSWcH/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 147
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.64
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 33 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 50737
Objects passed selection criteria: 50651
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 47137.2
Average stars matched: 45273.8 (96.0467 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 271596 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Aug 16 22:43:39 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_223119_TTUQ1b1x1_47585_FKYBSWcH/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-29-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_223119_TTUQ1b1x1_47585_FKYBSWcH/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_223119_TTUQ1b1x1_47585_FKYBSWcH/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-29-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_223119_TTUQ1b1x1_47585_FKYBSWcH/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461269.64548950
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
'asassn_transients_list.txt' -> '../asassn_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-29-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:06:42.249 -18:01:08.97 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-29-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-29-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:06:40.363 -17:59:58.56 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:06:42.249 -18:01:08.97
Second-epoch image center 15:06:40.363 -17:59:58.56
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0209 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
Image size: 934.3'x628.1' 15.6(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.85"/pix along the X axis and 5.90"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:06:44.490 -18:00:51.47 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:06:42.249 -18:01:08.97
Second-epoch image center 15:06:44.490 -18:00:51.47
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0101 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 15:06:40.363 -17:59:58.56
Second-epoch second image center 15:06:44.490 -18:00:51.47
Angular distance between the image centers 0.02199 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits &> /tmp/tmp.CeBf0IqWjG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2IphWpGWqh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_223119_TTUQ1b1x1_47585_FKYBSWcH/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-29-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rapI9ungAa
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_223119_TTUQ1b1x1_47585_FKYBSWcH/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-29-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_223119_TTUQ1b1x1_47585_FKYBSWcH/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JQDKsRrnzL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_223119_TTUQ1b1x1_47585_FKYBSWcH/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits and wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits and wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits and wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits) and catalog (wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 8181 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 218.2313 to 235.1251 deg, Dec -23.2843 to -12.6723 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 218.2313 to 235.1251 deg, Dec -23.2843 to -12.6723 deg
Loaded 6120 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4923 out of 5057 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5057 out of 8181 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.752400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.752400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.92
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.83
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.83
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 8181 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 218.2313 to 235.1251 deg, Dec -23.2843 to -12.6723 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 218.2313 to 235.1251 deg, Dec -23.2843 to -12.6723 deg
Loaded 6120 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4923 out of 5057 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5057 out of 8181 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits (aperture=6.4)
Read 8201 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 218.2310 to 235.1250 deg, Dec -23.2849 to -12.6723 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 218.2310 to 235.1250 deg, Dec -23.2849 to -12.6723 deg
Loaded 6120 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4901 out of 5051 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5051 out of 8201 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits (aperture=6.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 8 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits
2.2 pix Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
2.2 pix fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-29-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
2.2 pix fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.8 mag. Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits
14.8 mag. Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-29-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.5 (SNR ) 11.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.CeBf0IqWjG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_223119_TTUQ1b1x1_47585_FKYBSWcH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits' -> 'wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=461, bad_region=0, passed=8181
Got 8181 stars (including 7713 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8181 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4878 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4861 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4861 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4861 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8181 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4878 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4861 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8181 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4861 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8181 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4861 stars left (next iteration limit 5347)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits N_match=4861 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.505 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.527 n_q1=1242 n_q2=1074 n_q3=1394 n_q4=1151 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.334
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits -region wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.2IphWpGWqh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_223119_TTUQ1b1x1_47585_FKYBSWcH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits' -> 'wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=484, bad_region=0, passed=8201
Got 8201 stars (including 7705 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8201 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4882 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4867 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4867 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4867 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8201 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4882 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4867 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8201 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4867 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8201 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 4867 stars left (next iteration limit 5353)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits N_match=4867 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.427 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.518 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.549 n_q1=1246 n_q2=1073 n_q3=1399 n_q4=1149 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.286
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits -region wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.rapI9ungAa (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_223119_TTUQ1b1x1_47585_FKYBSWcH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_223119_TTUQ1b1x1_47585_FKYBSWcH/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-29-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_223119_TTUQ1b1x1_47585_FKYBSWcH/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-29-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_223119_TTUQ1b1x1_47585_FKYBSWcH/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-29-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_223119_TTUQ1b1x1_47585_FKYBSWcH/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-29-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_223119_TTUQ1b1x1_47585_FKYBSWcH/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-29-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_223119_TTUQ1b1x1_47585_FKYBSWcH/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-29-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-29-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-29-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-29-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-29-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-29-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-29-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-29-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_223119_TTUQ1b1x1_47585_FKYBSWcH/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-29-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-29-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=313, bad_region=0, passed=5698
Got 5698 stars (including 5379 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-29-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5698 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4876 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4860 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5698 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4877 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5698 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5698 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4860 stars left (next iteration limit 5346)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4860 robust_rms=9.277 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=14.966 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4860 robust_rms=0.426 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.489 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4860 robust_rms=0.320 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.394 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4860 robust_rms_before=0.946 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.320 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.320 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.366 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.394
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.366 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-29-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits N_match=4860 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.365 n_q1=1321 n_q2=1027 n_q3=1461 n_q4=1051 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.107
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-29-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-29-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_223119_TTUQ1b1x1_47585_FKYBSWcH/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-29-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits -region wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-29-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-29-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.JQDKsRrnzL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_223119_TTUQ1b1x1_47585_FKYBSWcH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_223119_TTUQ1b1x1_47585_FKYBSWcH/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_223119_TTUQ1b1x1_47585_FKYBSWcH/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_223119_TTUQ1b1x1_47585_FKYBSWcH/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_223119_TTUQ1b1x1_47585_FKYBSWcH/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_223119_TTUQ1b1x1_47585_FKYBSWcH/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_223119_TTUQ1b1x1_47585_FKYBSWcH/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_223119_TTUQ1b1x1_47585_FKYBSWcH/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=321, bad_region=0, passed=5627
Got 5627 stars (including 5294 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5627 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 934.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 934.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012976 (46.7 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010381 (37.4 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.6 to -12.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3432 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3198 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3234 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.09"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3179 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5311 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.20"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.6 to -12.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3592 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3382 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5336 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.11"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3373 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5329 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.00"
Excluding outliers - 3373 stars left (next iteration limit 3496)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: the 3373 catalog matches do not cover the frame (1305/444/1428/196 per quadrant, need 210 in each) - keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits N_match=3373 sigma_overall_arcsec=2.848 sigma_q1_arcsec=2.338 sigma_q2_arcsec=2.493 sigma_q3_arcsec=2.351 sigma_q4_arcsec=25.014 n_q1=1305 n_q2=444 n_q3=1428 n_q4=196 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=8.784
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_223119_TTUQ1b1x1_47585_FKYBSWcH/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits -region wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-29-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-29-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-29-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits sigma_overall=0.395 worst_q_ratio=1.334
ref2=Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits sigma_overall=0.427 worst_q_ratio=1.286
new1=fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-29-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits sigma_overall=0.330 worst_q_ratio=1.107
new2=fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits sigma_overall=2.848 worst_q_ratio=8.784
reference average sigma_overall=0.411 worst_q_ratio=1.31
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
WCS_QUALITY_RETRY: 2nd new image (fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits) flagged: sigma=2.848 (ref avg 0.411), ratio=8.784 (ref avg 1.31), threshold=2.0x. Retrying with --tweak-order 2.
Running with VAST_TWEAK_ORDER=2: util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_223119_TTUQ1b1x1_47585_FKYBSWcH/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_223119_TTUQ1b1x1_47585_FKYBSWcH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_223119_TTUQ1b1x1_47585_FKYBSWcH/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_223119_TTUQ1b1x1_47585_FKYBSWcH/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_223119_TTUQ1b1x1_47585_FKYBSWcH/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_223119_TTUQ1b1x1_47585_FKYBSWcH/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_223119_TTUQ1b1x1_47585_FKYBSWcH/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_223119_TTUQ1b1x1_47585_FKYBSWcH/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_223119_TTUQ1b1x1_47585_FKYBSWcH/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits .... Determining astrometry method...
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software...
Choosing aperture...
Using the catalog image00004.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_223119_TTUQ1b1x1_47585_FKYBSWcH/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_223119_TTUQ1b1x1_47585_FKYBSWcH/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 5504 high-SNR stars for plate solving
This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net.
For more information visit http://astrometry.net/
######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view #########
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_223119_TTUQ1b1x1_47585_FKYBSWcH/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code
IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0
Using solve-field binary
/usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out2622804.xyls"...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out2622804.axy"...
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4115.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4114.fits, field objects 1-10).
log-odds ratio 34.4786 (9.41573e+14), 16 match, 0 conflict, 35 distractors, 193 index.
RA,Dec = (226.721,-17.9933), pixel scale 5.93901 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++---++--------+-----+---+++--++--------++---++---+(best)---------++---+-+-------------+---------+---+----
Field 1: solved with index index-4113.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out2622804.solved to indicate this.
Field: out2622804.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (226.681031, -18.010772) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (15:06:43.447, -18:00:38.780).
Field size: 15.7976 x 10.5821 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.272 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Inserting WCS header... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_223119_TTUQ1b1x1_47585_FKYBSWcH/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits' -> 'fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits'
WCS keywords and Astrometry.net provenance markers have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M Aug 16 22:42 fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K Aug 16 22:42 out2622804.wcs
Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits)... done!
done!
All done!
done
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_223119_TTUQ1b1x1_47585_FKYBSWcH/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits (fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits)
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out2622804.xyls"...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out2622804.axy"...
Only searching for solutions within 15.7333 degrees of RA,Dec (226.68,-18.0115)
log-odds ratio 23.1915 (1.18014e+10), 5 match, 0 conflict, 14 distractors, 30 index.
RA,Dec = (226.698,-18.0293), pixel scale 5.94401 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +-------+-+-+-----+(best)-------------------+-------------------------------------------------------------
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out2622804.solved to indicate this.
Field: out2622804.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (226.707229, -18.028737) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (15:06:49.735, -18:01:43.454).
Field size: 15.7026 x 10.6194 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.517 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
WCS keywords and Astrometry.net provenance markers have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M Aug 16 22:42 fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K Aug 16 22:42 out2622804.wcs
Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits)... done!
done!
All done!
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors.
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_223119_TTUQ1b1x1_47585_FKYBSWcH/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.wcscat from image00004.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
Image size: 940.0'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:06:49.514 -18:01:46.28 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 5627 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_223119_TTUQ1b1x1_47585_FKYBSWcH/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2640967.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_223119_TTUQ1b1x1_47585_FKYBSWcH/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=321, bad_region=0, passed=5627
Got 5627 stars (including 5294 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5627 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013056 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010444 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.6 to -12.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2881 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2518 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2585 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.78"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2483 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5077 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 4.74"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.6 to -12.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3031 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2751 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5124 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 4.12"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2728 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5367 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 5.43"
Excluding outliers - 2728 stars left (next iteration limit 2731)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: the 2728 catalog matches do not cover the frame (1251/177/1178/122 per quadrant, need 170 in each) - keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits N_match=2728 sigma_overall_arcsec=1.683 sigma_q1_arcsec=1.501 sigma_q2_arcsec=19.760 sigma_q3_arcsec=1.363 sigma_q4_arcsec=26.688 n_q1=1251 n_q2=177 n_q3=1178 n_q4=122 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=15.861
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_223119_TTUQ1b1x1_47585_FKYBSWcH/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits -region wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
WCS_QUALITY_RETRY: --tweak-order 2 did NOT improve 2nd new image (fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits): sigma 2.848->1.683, ratio 8.784->15.861; reverting to order 3
WARNING: 2nd new image has sigma_overall_arcsec=1.683 -- 4.09x the reference average (0.411); plate solution may be of low accuracy
WARNING: 2nd new image has worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=15.861 -- 12.11x the reference average (1.31); plate solution may be of low accuracy
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255_astrometric_residuals.png (4861 matched stars from wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256_astrometric_residuals.png (4867 matched stars from wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.36 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-29-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072_astrometric_residuals.png (4860 matched stars from wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-29-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073_astrometric_residuals.png (3373 matched stars from wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.56 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-29-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-29-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_223119_TTUQ1b1x1_47585_FKYBSWcH/wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-29-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_223119_TTUQ1b1x1_47585_FKYBSWcH/wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Lib-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 14:57:14.85 -14:08:21.8: 11.58 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 14:57:14.85 -14:08:21.8: 11.61 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.59 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:57:14.85 -14:08:21.8: ref_mag=11.59 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6530 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 2s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20334_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 20334_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:08:10.45 -21:09:58.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20365_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 20365_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (702.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20374_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 20374_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (553.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20465_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 20465_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (1064.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20502_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 20502_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04497_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 04497_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:06:26.29 -18:43:57.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08120_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 08120_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (1075.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03695_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 03695_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (632.6") between the two second-epoch detections
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 3s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Lib-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_223119_TTUQ1b1x1_47585_FKYBSWcH/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-29-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_223119_TTUQ1b1x1_47585_FKYBSWcH/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_223119_TTUQ1b1x1_47585_FKYBSWcH/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-29-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_223119_TTUQ1b1x1_47585_FKYBSWcH/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-29-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-29-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:06:42.249 -18:01:08.97 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-29-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-29-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:06:40.363 -17:59:58.56 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:06:42.249 -18:01:08.97
Second-epoch image center 15:06:40.363 -17:59:58.56
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0209 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
Image size: 934.3'x628.1' 15.6(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.85"/pix along the X axis and 5.90"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:06:44.490 -18:00:51.47 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:06:42.249 -18:01:08.97
Second-epoch image center 15:06:44.490 -18:00:51.47
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0101 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 15:06:40.363 -17:59:58.56
Second-epoch second image center 15:06:44.490 -18:00:51.47
Angular distance between the image centers 0.02199 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rIAmqBDUsZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits &> /tmp/tmp.86iUO2S1q0
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_223119_TTUQ1b1x1_47585_FKYBSWcH/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-29-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LuFKBKep1G
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_223119_TTUQ1b1x1_47585_FKYBSWcH/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-29-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_223119_TTUQ1b1x1_47585_FKYBSWcH/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits &> /tmp/tmp.X5RqcG2Gn7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_223119_TTUQ1b1x1_47585_FKYBSWcH/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits and wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits and wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits and wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits) and catalog (wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 51857 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 218.2134 to 235.1637 deg, Dec -23.2843 to -12.6566 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 218.2134 to 235.1637 deg, Dec -23.2843 to -12.6566 deg
Loaded 6151 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4875 out of 5308 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5308 out of 51857 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.607400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.607400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.64
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.97
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.97
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 51857 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 218.2134 to 235.1637 deg, Dec -23.2843 to -12.6566 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 218.2134 to 235.1637 deg, Dec -23.2843 to -12.6566 deg
Loaded 6151 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4875 out of 5308 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5308 out of 51857 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits (aperture=4.9)
Read 52458 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 218.2310 to 235.1730 deg, Dec -23.2926 to -12.6589 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 218.2310 to 235.1730 deg, Dec -23.2926 to -12.6589 deg
Loaded 6152 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4850 out of 5293 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5293 out of 52458 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits (aperture=4.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 135 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits
2.2 pix Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
2.1 pix fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-29-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
2.1 pix fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.0 mag. Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits
15.0 mag. Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-29-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 14.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.rIAmqBDUsZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_223119_TTUQ1b1x1_47585_FKYBSWcH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits' -> 'wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=2749, bad_region=0, passed=51851
Got 51851 stars (including 49040 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 51851 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4879 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4868 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4868 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4868 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51851 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4879 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4868 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51851 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4868 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51851 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4868 stars left (next iteration limit 5354)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits N_match=4868 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.480 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.523 n_q1=1258 n_q2=1061 n_q3=1437 n_q4=1112 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.352
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits -region wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.86iUO2S1q0 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_223119_TTUQ1b1x1_47585_FKYBSWcH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits' -> 'wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=2753, bad_region=0, passed=52452
Got 52452 stars (including 49617 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 52452 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4879 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4868 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4868 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4868 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52452 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4879 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4868 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52452 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4868 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52452 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4868 stars left (next iteration limit 5354)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits N_match=4868 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.413 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.505 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.538 n_q1=1255 n_q2=1069 n_q3=1425 n_q4=1119 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.305
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits -region wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.LuFKBKep1G (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_223119_TTUQ1b1x1_47585_FKYBSWcH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_223119_TTUQ1b1x1_47585_FKYBSWcH/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-29-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_223119_TTUQ1b1x1_47585_FKYBSWcH/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-29-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_223119_TTUQ1b1x1_47585_FKYBSWcH/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-29-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_223119_TTUQ1b1x1_47585_FKYBSWcH/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-29-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_223119_TTUQ1b1x1_47585_FKYBSWcH/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-29-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_223119_TTUQ1b1x1_47585_FKYBSWcH/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-29-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-29-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-29-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-29-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-29-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-29-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-29-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-29-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_223119_TTUQ1b1x1_47585_FKYBSWcH/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-29-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-29-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=1463, bad_region=3, passed=42581
Got 42581 stars (including 41043 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-29-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 42581 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.6 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4873 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4861 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4861 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4861 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42581 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.6 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4874 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4861 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42581 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4861 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42581 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4861 stars left (next iteration limit 5347)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-29-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4861 robust_rms=8.951 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=14.332 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4861 robust_rms=0.428 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.482 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4861 robust_rms=0.318 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.392 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4861 robust_rms_before=0.951 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.318 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.318 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.361 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.392
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.361 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-29-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits N_match=4861 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.301 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.356 n_q1=1333 n_q2=1054 n_q3=1440 n_q4=1034 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.092
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-29-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-29-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_223119_TTUQ1b1x1_47585_FKYBSWcH/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-29-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits -region wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-29-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-29-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.X5RqcG2Gn7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_223119_TTUQ1b1x1_47585_FKYBSWcH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_223119_TTUQ1b1x1_47585_FKYBSWcH/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_223119_TTUQ1b1x1_47585_FKYBSWcH/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_223119_TTUQ1b1x1_47585_FKYBSWcH/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_223119_TTUQ1b1x1_47585_FKYBSWcH/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_223119_TTUQ1b1x1_47585_FKYBSWcH/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_223119_TTUQ1b1x1_47585_FKYBSWcH/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_223119_TTUQ1b1x1_47585_FKYBSWcH/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=1433, bad_region=7, passed=42922
Got 42922 stars (including 41411 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 42922 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 934.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 934.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012976 (46.7 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010381 (37.4 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.6 to -12.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3448 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3227 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3254 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.07"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3209 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40787 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.03"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.6 to -12.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3612 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3422 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40823 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.91"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3416 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41278 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.95"
Excluding outliers - 3416 stars left (next iteration limit 3529)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: the 3416 catalog matches do not cover the frame (1324/492/1405/195 per quadrant, need 213 in each) - keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits N_match=3416 sigma_overall_arcsec=2.828 sigma_q1_arcsec=2.319 sigma_q2_arcsec=2.461 sigma_q3_arcsec=2.307 sigma_q4_arcsec=23.427 n_q1=1324 n_q2=492 n_q3=1405 n_q4=195 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=8.285
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_223119_TTUQ1b1x1_47585_FKYBSWcH/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits -region wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-29-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_223119_TTUQ1b1x1_47585_FKYBSWcH/wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-29-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_223119_TTUQ1b1x1_47585_FKYBSWcH/wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Lib-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 15:09:30.60 -12:56:38.8: 13.54 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 15:01:15.35 -16:00:00.6: 13.95 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 15:11:22.91 -14:37:14.2: 13.73 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 15:24:24.38 -14:09:00.9: 13.62 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 15:26:17.39 -15:55:11.7: 14.43 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 15:24:24.38 -14:09:00.9: 13.61 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 15:11:22.91 -14:37:14.2: 13.80 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.61 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:24:24.38 -14:09:00.9: ref_mag=13.61 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0416 delta=-0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 15:26:17.39 -15:55:11.7: 14.67 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.52 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 15:12:12.16 -16:37:25.1: 13.80 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:11:22.91 -14:37:14.2: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1135 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:26:17.39 -15:55:11.7: ref_mag=14.52 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4616 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 15:01:15.35 -16:00:00.6: 14.15 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:01:15.35 -16:00:00.6: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.4565 delta=-0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 15:09:30.60 -12:56:38.8: 13.59 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.56 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:09:30.60 -12:56:38.8: ref_mag=13.56 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7451 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 15:12:12.16 -16:37:25.1: 13.79 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:12:12.16 -16:37:25.1: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8145 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 15:17:08.94 -16:41:44.0: 13.63 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 15:10:54.41 -15:48:00.7: 13.27 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 15:17:08.94 -16:41:44.0: 13.46 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.53 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:17:08.94 -16:41:44.0: ref_mag=13.53 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7997 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 15:10:54.41 -15:48:00.7: 13.42 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.34 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:10:54.41 -15:48:00.7: ref_mag=13.34 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3420 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 15:25:33.48 -13:18:05.4: 15.50 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 15:27:35.14 -14:56:48.3: 12.45 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 15:38:52.75 -16:53:58.4: 15.29 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 15:25:33.48 -13:18:05.4: 15.55 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 15:24:28.09 -19:56:36.7: 13.07 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 15:27:35.14 -14:56:48.3: 12.48 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 15:38:52.75 -16:53:58.4: 15.31 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.46 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:27:35.14 -14:56:48.3: ref_mag=12.46 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4607 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 15:17:22.21 -21:01:11.4: 13.39 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 15:24:28.09 -19:56:36.7: 12.95 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.01 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:24:28.09 -19:56:36.7: ref_mag=13.01 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0592 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 15:29:38.80 -15:31:57.1: 13.31 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 15:11:10.15 -16:58:46.8: 13.49 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 15:36:48.56 -15:31:12.7: 13.45 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 15:17:22.21 -21:01:11.4: 13.45 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 15:19:53.54 -14:52:13.5: 15.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.42 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:17:22.21 -21:01:11.4: ref_mag=13.42 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.2595 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 15:29:38.80 -15:31:57.1: 13.26 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.28 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:29:38.80 -15:31:57.1: ref_mag=13.28 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4663 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 15:11:10.15 -16:58:46.8: 13.47 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 15:36:48.56 -15:31:12.7: 13.50 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:36:48.56 -15:31:12.7: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.4381 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.48 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:11:10.15 -16:58:46.8: ref_mag=13.48 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5966 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 15:19:53.54 -14:52:13.5: 15.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 15:29:54.97 -14:36:08.5: 13.58 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 14:59:27.12 -12:50:28.1: 13.79 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 15:29:54.97 -14:36:08.5: 13.52 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.55 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:29:54.97 -14:36:08.5: ref_mag=13.55 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8462 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 14:59:27.12 -12:50:28.1: 13.67 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 15:12:07.55 -18:11:10.8: 13.69 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.72 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:59:27.12 -12:50:28.1: ref_mag=13.72 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6029 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 15:10:28.53 -14:46:44.1: 14.01 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 15:12:07.55 -18:11:10.8: 13.81 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.74 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:12:07.55 -18:11:10.8: ref_mag=13.74 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.7748 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 15:10:28.53 -14:46:44.1: 14.09 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:10:28.53 -14:46:44.1: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.0293 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 15:38:15.08 -13:53:21.8: 14.49 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 15:19:28.37 -17:52:21.0: 14.30 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 15:38:15.08 -13:53:21.8: 14.35 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.41 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:38:15.08 -13:53:21.8: ref_mag=14.41 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.1980 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 15:27:08.22 -15:07:03.0: 14.18 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 15:19:28.37 -17:52:21.0: 14.37 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.33 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:19:28.37 -17:52:21.0: ref_mag=14.33 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.1312 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 15:27:08.22 -15:07:03.0: 14.01 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.08 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:27:08.22 -15:07:03.0: ref_mag=14.08 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.0741 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 15:37:41.03 -22:01:15.1: 14.69 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 15:37:41.03 -22:01:15.1: 14.45 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.54 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:37:41.03 -22:01:15.1: ref_mag=14.54 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.1071 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 15:38:18.94 -14:11:34.8: 14.42 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 15:27:13.62 -16:07:02.1: 15.52 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 15:27:53.73 -16:34:11.5: 14.91 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 15:38:18.94 -14:11:34.8: 14.61 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.50 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:38:18.94 -14:11:34.8: ref_mag=14.50 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.2692 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 15:27:13.62 -16:07:02.1: 15.55 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 15:23:03.12 -13:12:47.0: 14.71 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 15:27:53.73 -16:34:11.5: 14.81 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:27:53.73 -16:34:11.5: ref_mag=14.85 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.3252 delta=0.53 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 15:23:03.12 -13:12:47.0: 14.51 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 15:04:10.67 -15:29:11.5: 14.49 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.59 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:23:03.12 -13:12:47.0: ref_mag=14.59 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5102 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 15:04:10.67 -15:29:11.5: 14.21 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.30 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:04:10.67 -15:29:11.5: ref_mag=14.30 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.2711 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 15:23:00.08 -18:51:54.0: 14.55 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 15:16:01.74 -16:25:28.6: 14.27 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 15:23:00.08 -18:51:54.0: 14.55 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.55 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:23:00.08 -18:51:54.0: ref_mag=14.55 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.4065 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-54-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 15:10:57.14 -14:26:36.7: 14.71 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 15:16:01.74 -16:25:28.6: 14.37 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.32 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:16:01.74 -16:25:28.6: ref_mag=14.32 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.2138 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 15:10:57.14 -14:26:36.7: 14.89 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:10:57.14 -14:26:36.7: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4991 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out66927.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out67098.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out67597.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out68158.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 14s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66551_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 66551_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66552_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 66552_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66557_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 66557_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66564_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 66564_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66565_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 66565_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (227.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66573_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 66573_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:17:24.50 -13:57:22.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66576_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 66576_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66579_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 66579_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (595.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66583_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 66583_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (120.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66584_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 66584_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66585_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 66585_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (325.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66590_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 66590_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66592_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 66592_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (1206.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66593_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 66593_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:02:12.24 -13:42:25.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66594_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 66594_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66595_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 66595_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:05:06.92 -13:55:19.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66596_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 66596_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (1090.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66598_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 66598_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66600_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 66600_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (557.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66601_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 66601_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:14:58.93 -15:21:23.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66606_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 66606_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:30:59.52 -15:02:00.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66608_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 66608_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:35:09.25 -15:53:59.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66609_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 66609_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:58:05.02 -13:32:57.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66610_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 66610_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (432.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66612_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 66612_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66614_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 66614_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (727.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66616_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 66616_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (507.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66617_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 66617_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (981.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66619_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 66619_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (768.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66621_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 66621_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (432.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66622_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 66622_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (960.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66623_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 66623_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (199.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66624_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 66624_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (78.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66626_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 66626_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (681.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66628_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 66628_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:56:41.28 -13:58:45.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66629_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 66629_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:57:15.77 -14:08:19.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66630_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 66630_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:26:35.68 -14:10:26.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66631_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 66631_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (495.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66634_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 66634_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:21:57.85 -13:30:32.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66692_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 66692_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (701.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66927_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
Preparing report for the candidate 66927_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66971_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 66971_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67018_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 67018_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (89.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67066_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 67066_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (272.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67098_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
Preparing report for the candidate 67098_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67170_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 67170_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (159.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67250_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 67250_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67275_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 67275_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:33:05.80 -14:14:30.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67291_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 67291_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (840.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67360_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 67360_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (638.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67372_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 67372_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67414_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 67414_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (741.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67450_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 67450_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67453_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 67453_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (1392.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67484_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 67484_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67529_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 67529_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67597_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
Preparing report for the candidate 67597_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67631_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 67631_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (1544.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67632_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 67632_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:33:40.10 -14:56:15.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67667_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 67667_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (635.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67668_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 67668_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (1243.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67670_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 67670_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (226.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67682_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 67682_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67689_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 67689_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (1380.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67697_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 67697_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (1489.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67738_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 67738_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67742_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 67742_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (335.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67760_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 67760_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (1125.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67766_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 67766_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (1284.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67782_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 67782_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (1118.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67799_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 67799_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:19:46.38 -19:33:51.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67802_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 67802_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67847_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 67847_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (346.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67883_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 67883_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67890_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 67890_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (1049.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67908_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 67908_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (805.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67933_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 67933_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:17:29.56 -19:44:36.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67945_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 67945_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (603.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67957_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 67957_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67971_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 67971_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68000_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 68000_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (302.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68006_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 68006_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (462.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68020_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 68020_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68021_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 68021_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (617.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68026_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 68026_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (424.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68032_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 68032_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (581.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68044_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 68044_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (580.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68055_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 68055_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (447.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68073_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 68073_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68074_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 68074_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (439.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68082_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 68082_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (1205.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68092_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 68092_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (310.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68111_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 68111_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (256.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68115_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 68115_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (1021.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68119_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 68119_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (477.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68121_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 68121_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (1273.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68136_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 68136_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (469.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68145_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 68145_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (808.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68158_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
Preparing report for the candidate 68158_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68160_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 68160_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68161_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 68161_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68169_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 68169_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (556.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68172_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 68172_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (660.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68183_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 68183_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (229.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68193_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 68193_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (510.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68201_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 68201_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (329.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68202_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 68202_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (302.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68204_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 68204_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68207_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 68207_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (1026.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68221_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 68221_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68234_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 68234_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (391.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68235_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 68235_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (551.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68239_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 68239_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (342.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68259_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 68259_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68261_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 68261_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68262_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 68262_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (432.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68271_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 68271_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (249.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68277_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 68277_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68289_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 68289_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (241.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68304_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 68304_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (35.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68318_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 68318_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (234.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68324_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 68324_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (327.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34512_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 34512_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (1565.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23813_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 23813_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (633.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33418_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 33418_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (1068.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 47470_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 47470_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (1064.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51001_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 51001_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (556.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 44383_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 44383_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:08:10.45 -21:09:58.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 38615_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 38615_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (1374.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 38943_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 38943_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (1428.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34427_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 34427_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (1389.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28939_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 28939_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:06:26.26 -18:43:56.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 38683_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 38683_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (1184.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34298_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 34298_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (1543.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33695_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073
The candidate 33695_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_22-30-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0073 did not pass the final checks
