This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055025_TTUQ1b1x1_3519911_pERxfXKp
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
U Gem,2461268.9507,10.04,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
U Gem 20260816.4507 10.04CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 16.4507 2461268.9507 12.80 07:10:08.06 +22:25:22.2
194.60778 13.94380 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 7.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.521 Brixia -0 0 0 13.3 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:10:08.06 +22:25:22.2: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:10:08.06 +22:25:22.2: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461268.9507,12.80,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260816.4507 12.80CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 16.4507 2461268.9507 12.82 07:09:48.78 +17:41:17.7
198.99778 11.91468 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 8.0 pix
The object was found in VSX13" PS1-3PI J070947.87+174115.0
Type: RRAB
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
16.920 r Y 0.800 r 2457000.44600 0.519883000000
NOTE: the measured brightness disagrees with the variable-star record above, but is consistent with the asteroid identification below - so this is likely the asteroid rather than an outburst of the variable.
The object was found in astcheck.202 Chryseis 0 1 1 13.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:09:48.78 +17:41:17.7: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:09:48.78 +17:41:17.7: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
PS1-3PI J070947.87+174115.0,2461268.9507,12.82,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
PS1-3PI J070947.87+174115.0 20260816.4507 12.82CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 16.4507 2461268.9507 13.31 07:24:58.74 +26:29:29.2
192.06784 18.63610 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.1" and 7.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.423 Diotima 1 1 1 13.5 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:24:58.74 +26:29:29.2: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:24:58.74 +26:29:29.2: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461268.9507,13.31,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260816.4507 13.31CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 16.4507 2461268.9507 13.77 07:08:52.15 +24:41:37.9
192.34215 14.59220 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.8" and 7.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.779 Nina 1 -0 1 13.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:08:52.15 +24:41:37.9: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:08:52.15 +24:41:37.9: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461268.9507,13.77,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260816.4507 13.77CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 16.4507 2461268.9507 13.32 07:04:55.39 +24:40:03.2
191.99579 13.76069 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 7.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J070455.39+244003.7
Type: EA
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.010 g Y 0.280 g 2459196.85000 5.836600000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:04:55.39 +24:40:03.2: 14.30 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:04:55.39 +24:40:03.2: 14.23 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.26 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J070455.39+244003.7,2461268.9507,13.32,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J070455.39+244003.7 20260816.4507 13.32CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
U Gem,2461268.9507,10.11,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
U Gem 20260816.4507 10.11CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.68545435 22.02.2026 04:26:53.256 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
First image: 2461093.68545435 22.02.2026 04:26:53.256 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Last image: 2461268.95104844 16.08.2026 10:49:20.585 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055025_TTUQ1b1x1_3519911_pERxfXKp/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 8
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.64
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 22044
Objects passed selection criteria: 21904
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 14693.5
Average stars matched: 14307 (97.3696 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 246716 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Aug 16 05:52:55 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.68545435 22.02.2026 04:26:53.256 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
First image: 2461093.68545435 22.02.2026 04:26:53.256 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Last image: 2461268.95104844 16.08.2026 10:49:20.585 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055025_TTUQ1b1x1_3519911_pERxfXKp/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 128
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.35
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 30 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 139997
Objects passed selection criteria: 139560
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 101068
Average stars matched: 97101.5 (96.0754 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 605160 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Aug 16 05:54:06 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055025_TTUQ1b1x1_3519911_pERxfXKp/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055025_TTUQ1b1x1_3519911_pERxfXKp/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055025_TTUQ1b1x1_3519911_pERxfXKp/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055025_TTUQ1b1x1_3519911_pERxfXKp/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461268.95032758
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
Image size: 945.2'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:03.941 +22:02:55.12 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41
Second-epoch image center 07:23:03.941 +22:02:55.12
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0488 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits
Image size: 945.0'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:01.634 +22:02:22.77 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41
Second-epoch image center 07:23:01.634 +22:02:22.77
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0407 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:23:03.941 +22:02:55.12
Second-epoch second image center 07:23:01.634 +22:02:22.77
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01265 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits &> /tmp/tmp.g64Tk0DMle
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits &> /tmp/tmp.us1QaWQAij
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055025_TTUQ1b1x1_3519911_pERxfXKp/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WAtQx0P08J
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055025_TTUQ1b1x1_3519911_pERxfXKp/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055025_TTUQ1b1x1_3519911_pERxfXKp/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KTjGSengCF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055025_TTUQ1b1x1_3519911_pERxfXKp/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 23656 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0337 to 119.5911 deg, Dec +16.4797 to +27.2941 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0337 to 119.5911 deg, Dec 16.4797 to 27.2941 deg
Loaded 13974 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10666 out of 11758 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11758 out of 23656 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.929600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.929600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.64
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.29
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.29
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 23656 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0337 to 119.5911 deg, Dec +16.4797 to +27.2941 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0337 to 119.5911 deg, Dec 16.4797 to 27.2941 deg
Loaded 13974 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10666 out of 11758 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11758 out of 23656 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 23398 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0336 to 119.5911 deg, Dec +16.4801 to +27.2943 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0336 to 119.5911 deg, Dec 16.4801 to 27.2943 deg
Loaded 13972 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10626 out of 11736 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11736 out of 23398 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 8 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
2.3 pix Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
2.2 pix fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
2.2 pix fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
15.3 mag. Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
13.6 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
13.6 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.6 (SNR ) 10.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.g64Tk0DMle (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055025_TTUQ1b1x1_3519911_pERxfXKp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2265, bad_region=1, passed=23656
Got 23656 stars (including 21361 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23656 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4849 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4811 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4812 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4811 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23656 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4849 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4811 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23656 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4811 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23656 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4811 stars left (next iteration limit 5292)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits N_match=4811 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.458 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.409 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.341 n_q1=904 n_q2=1356 n_q3=1059 n_q4=1492 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.183
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.us1QaWQAij (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055025_TTUQ1b1x1_3519911_pERxfXKp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2268, bad_region=1, passed=23398
Got 23398 stars (including 21095 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23398 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4844 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4805 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4806 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4805 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23398 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4845 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4806 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23398 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4806 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23398 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 4806 stars left (next iteration limit 5285)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits N_match=4806 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.426 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.544 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.428 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.377 n_q1=895 n_q2=1351 n_q3=1061 n_q4=1499 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.279
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.WAtQx0P08J (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055025_TTUQ1b1x1_3519911_pERxfXKp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055025_TTUQ1b1x1_3519911_pERxfXKp/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055025_TTUQ1b1x1_3519911_pERxfXKp/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055025_TTUQ1b1x1_3519911_pERxfXKp/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055025_TTUQ1b1x1_3519911_pERxfXKp/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055025_TTUQ1b1x1_3519911_pERxfXKp/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055025_TTUQ1b1x1_3519911_pERxfXKp/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055025_TTUQ1b1x1_3519911_pERxfXKp/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=354, bad_region=0, passed=6072
Got 6072 stars (including 5713 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6072 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013128 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010502 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.4 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4837 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4789 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4789 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4789 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6072 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.4 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4836 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4792 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6072 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4792 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6072 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 4792 stars left (next iteration limit 5267)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4792 robust_rms=6.133 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=43.831 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4792 robust_rms=0.527 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.925 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4792 robust_rms=0.410 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.621 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4792 robust_rms_before=1.422 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.428 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.410 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.608 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.621
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.608 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits N_match=4792 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.432 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.582 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.471 n_q1=1689 n_q2=731 n_q3=1687 n_q4=685 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.348
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055025_TTUQ1b1x1_3519911_pERxfXKp/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.KTjGSengCF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055025_TTUQ1b1x1_3519911_pERxfXKp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055025_TTUQ1b1x1_3519911_pERxfXKp/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055025_TTUQ1b1x1_3519911_pERxfXKp/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055025_TTUQ1b1x1_3519911_pERxfXKp/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055025_TTUQ1b1x1_3519911_pERxfXKp/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055025_TTUQ1b1x1_3519911_pERxfXKp/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055025_TTUQ1b1x1_3519911_pERxfXKp/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055025_TTUQ1b1x1_3519911_pERxfXKp/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=378, bad_region=0, passed=6071
Got 6071 stars (including 5686 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6071 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013125 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010500 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4842 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4796 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4796 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4796 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6070 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4842 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4797 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6070 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4797 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6070 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 4797 stars left (next iteration limit 5275)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4797 robust_rms=6.236 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=45.069 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4797 robust_rms=0.536 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.714 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4797 robust_rms=0.412 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.567 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4797 robust_rms_before=1.375 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.422 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.412 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.562 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.567
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.562 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits N_match=4797 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.425 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.414 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.525 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.448 n_q1=1699 n_q2=732 n_q3=1680 n_q4=686 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.234
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055025_TTUQ1b1x1_3519911_pERxfXKp/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits sigma_overall=0.387 worst_q_ratio=1.183
ref2=Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits sigma_overall=0.426 worst_q_ratio=1.279
new1=fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits sigma_overall=0.432 worst_q_ratio=1.348
new2=fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits sigma_overall=0.425 worst_q_ratio=1.234
reference average sigma_overall=0.4065 worst_q_ratio=1.231
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153_astrometric_residuals.png (4811 matched stars from wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154_astrometric_residuals.png (4806 matched stars from wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0165_astrometric_residuals.png (4792 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166_astrometric_residuals.png (4797 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055025_TTUQ1b1x1_3519911_pERxfXKp/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055025_TTUQ1b1x1_3519911_pERxfXKp/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:09.78 +22:47:45.2: 10.83 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:35.38 +22:51:40.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:42.81 +22:54:43.0: 10.03 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:32.36 +23:01:31.3: 11.21 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:42.81 +22:54:43.0: 10.03 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:09.78 +22:47:45.2: 10.82 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:35.38 +22:51:40.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:35.38 +22:51:40.3: the source is saturated (present but too bright to measure) on at least one reference image -- likely a star-matching failure rather than a new transient
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:32.36 +23:01:31.3: 11.23 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.03 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.82 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:42.81 +22:54:43.0: ref_mag=10.03 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=10.5423 delta=-0.51 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.22 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:09.78 +22:47:45.2: ref_mag=10.82 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.0420 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:32.36 +23:01:31.3: ref_mag=11.22 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.2061 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 3s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31373_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 31373_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31413_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 31413_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:34.09 +25:59:42.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31431_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 31431_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31441_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
Preparing report for the candidate 31441_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31474_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 31474_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31489_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 31489_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05064_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 05064_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:44:26.53 +24:23:48.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18333_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 18333_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:46:07.13 +18:30:33.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 4s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055025_TTUQ1b1x1_3519911_pERxfXKp/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055025_TTUQ1b1x1_3519911_pERxfXKp/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055025_TTUQ1b1x1_3519911_pERxfXKp/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055025_TTUQ1b1x1_3519911_pERxfXKp/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
Image size: 945.2'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:03.941 +22:02:55.12 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41
Second-epoch image center 07:23:03.941 +22:02:55.12
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0488 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits
Image size: 945.0'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:01.634 +22:02:22.77 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41
Second-epoch image center 07:23:01.634 +22:02:22.77
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0407 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:23:03.941 +22:02:55.12
Second-epoch second image center 07:23:01.634 +22:02:22.77
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01265 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ShmzKbbBqf
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1xf9UARV50
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055025_TTUQ1b1x1_3519911_pERxfXKp/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits &> /tmp/tmp.CsO4pFYCyx
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055025_TTUQ1b1x1_3519911_pERxfXKp/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055025_TTUQ1b1x1_3519911_pERxfXKp/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FTYulmsir0
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055025_TTUQ1b1x1_3519911_pERxfXKp/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 151496 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0323 to 119.6245 deg, Dec +16.4740 to +27.2968 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0323 to 119.6245 deg, Dec 16.4740 to 27.2968 deg
Loaded 14006 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8794 out of 12008 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12008 out of 151496 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.796750
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.796750
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.35
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 151496 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0323 to 119.6245 deg, Dec +16.4740 to +27.2968 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0323 to 119.6245 deg, Dec 16.4740 to 27.2968 deg
Loaded 14006 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8794 out of 12008 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12008 out of 151496 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (aperture=4.8)
Read 153605 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0325 to 119.6247 deg, Dec +16.4748 to +27.3045 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0325 to 119.6247 deg, Dec 16.4748 to 27.3045 deg
Loaded 14009 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8793 out of 12010 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12010 out of 153605 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits (aperture=4.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 126 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
2.1 pix Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
2.2 pix fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
2.2 pix fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
15.4 mag. Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.8 (SNR ) 13.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.ShmzKbbBqf (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055025_TTUQ1b1x1_3519911_pERxfXKp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=46, blended=17705, bad_region=3, passed=151450
Got 151450 stars (including 133484 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 151450 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4826 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4804 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 151450 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4826 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4804 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 151450 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4804 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 151450 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4804 stars left (next iteration limit 5283)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits N_match=4804 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.439 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.333 n_q1=951 n_q2=1322 n_q3=1097 n_q4=1434 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.231
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.1xf9UARV50 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055025_TTUQ1b1x1_3519911_pERxfXKp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=67, blended=17785, bad_region=5, passed=153538
Got 153538 stars (including 135488 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 153538 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4823 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4802 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4803 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4802 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 153538 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4823 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 153538 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 153538 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 4803 stars left (next iteration limit 5282)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits N_match=4803 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.508 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.411 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.371 n_q1=940 n_q2=1323 n_q3=1093 n_q4=1447 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.259
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.CsO4pFYCyx (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055025_TTUQ1b1x1_3519911_pERxfXKp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055025_TTUQ1b1x1_3519911_pERxfXKp/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055025_TTUQ1b1x1_3519911_pERxfXKp/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055025_TTUQ1b1x1_3519911_pERxfXKp/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055025_TTUQ1b1x1_3519911_pERxfXKp/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055025_TTUQ1b1x1_3519911_pERxfXKp/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055025_TTUQ1b1x1_3519911_pERxfXKp/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055025_TTUQ1b1x1_3519911_pERxfXKp/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=2192, bad_region=14, passed=50804
Got 50804 stars (including 48519 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 50804 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013128 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010502 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4832 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4785 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4786 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4785 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50794 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4833 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4787 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50794 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4787 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50794 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 4787 stars left (next iteration limit 5263)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4787 robust_rms=6.230 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=41.170 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4787 robust_rms=0.522 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.900 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4787 robust_rms=0.410 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.604 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4787 robust_rms_before=1.432 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.411 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.410 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.572 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.604
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.572 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits N_match=4787 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.569 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.470 n_q1=1682 n_q2=729 n_q3=1668 n_q4=708 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.368
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055025_TTUQ1b1x1_3519911_pERxfXKp/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.FTYulmsir0 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055025_TTUQ1b1x1_3519911_pERxfXKp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055025_TTUQ1b1x1_3519911_pERxfXKp/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055025_TTUQ1b1x1_3519911_pERxfXKp/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055025_TTUQ1b1x1_3519911_pERxfXKp/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055025_TTUQ1b1x1_3519911_pERxfXKp/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055025_TTUQ1b1x1_3519911_pERxfXKp/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055025_TTUQ1b1x1_3519911_pERxfXKp/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055025_TTUQ1b1x1_3519911_pERxfXKp/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=2292, bad_region=17, passed=51294
Got 51294 stars (including 48888 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 51294 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013125 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010500 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4832 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4792 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51286 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4831 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4790 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51286 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4790 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51286 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4790 stars left (next iteration limit 5270)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4790 robust_rms=6.318 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=44.031 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4790 robust_rms=0.533 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.713 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4790 robust_rms=0.411 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.566 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4790 robust_rms_before=1.385 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.401 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.411 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.530 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.566
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.530 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits N_match=4790 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.516 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.427 n_q1=1687 n_q2=729 n_q3=1669 n_q4=705 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.279
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055025_TTUQ1b1x1_3519911_pERxfXKp/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055025_TTUQ1b1x1_3519911_pERxfXKp/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-48-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0165.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055025_TTUQ1b1x1_3519911_pERxfXKp/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:19:21.19 +18:47:51.0: 13.06 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:21:28.67 +23:40:18.2: 13.39 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:14:39.63 +19:10:02.6: 12.88 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:07:25.98 +20:54:37.9: 13.29 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:21:28.67 +23:40:18.2: 13.46 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:07:25.98 +20:54:37.9: 13.25 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:14:39.63 +19:10:02.6: 12.80 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:19:21.19 +18:47:51.0: 13.05 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.42 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.27 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.84 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:21:28.67 +23:40:18.2: ref_mag=13.42 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5107 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.06 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:07:25.98 +20:54:37.9: ref_mag=13.27 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0860 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:07:30.02 +27:10:53.0: 12.58 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:14:39.63 +19:10:02.6: ref_mag=12.84 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8224 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:19:21.19 +18:47:51.0: ref_mag=13.06 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1912 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:01.27 +19:41:49.0: 12.55 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:07:30.02 +27:10:53.0: 12.67 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.62 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:07:30.02 +27:10:53.0: ref_mag=12.62 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5864 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:49.90 +22:56:14.7: 10.41 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:01.27 +19:41:49.0: 12.54 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.54 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:01.27 +19:41:49.0: ref_mag=12.54 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5499 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:13.84 +22:54:53.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:49.90 +22:56:14.7: 10.42 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.41 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:49.90 +22:56:14.7: ref_mag=10.41 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=11.3741 delta=-0.96 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:57:57.54 +22:31:30.8: 12.17 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:13.84 +22:54:53.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:13.84 +22:54:53.3: the source is saturated (present but too bright to measure) on at least one reference image -- likely a star-matching failure rather than a new transient
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:11:27.20 +26:25:33.6: 12.55 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:54.87 +22:50:51.0: 10.71 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:57:57.54 +22:31:30.8: 12.22 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.19 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:57:57.54 +22:31:30.8: ref_mag=12.19 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3668 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:54.87 +22:50:51.0: 10.73 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:11:27.20 +26:25:33.6: 12.55 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.72 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:54.87 +22:50:51.0: ref_mag=10.72 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=12.4618 delta=-1.74 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.55 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:11:27.20 +26:25:33.6: ref_mag=12.55 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3885 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:20:35.07 +19:24:25.9: 12.59 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:54:23.06 +21:10:55.1: 12.85 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:20:35.07 +19:24:25.9: 12.55 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.57 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:20:35.07 +19:24:25.9: ref_mag=12.57 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3915 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:10:08.06 +22:25:22.2: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:54:23.06 +21:10:55.1: 12.82 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:41:13.52 +20:25:10.8: 12.24 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.83 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:54:23.06 +21:10:55.1: ref_mag=12.83 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8322 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:01:37.29 +21:43:09.1: 13.08 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:58:32.33 +18:05:27.6: 12.94 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:10:08.06 +22:25:22.2: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:41:13.52 +20:25:10.8: 12.25 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.24 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:41:13.52 +20:25:10.8: ref_mag=12.24 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3218 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:01:37.29 +21:43:09.1: 13.07 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.07 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:01:37.29 +21:43:09.1: ref_mag=13.07 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0166 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:58:32.33 +18:05:27.6: 12.90 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.92 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:58:32.33 +18:05:27.6: ref_mag=12.92 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8163 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:39:50.58 +26:43:40.1: 12.63 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:12:21.75 +18:38:30.5: 12.88 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:09:48.78 +17:41:17.7: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:24.76 +22:49:54.1: 12.73 +/- 0.35 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:39:50.58 +26:43:40.1: 12.60 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.61 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:39:50.58 +26:43:40.1: ref_mag=12.61 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7973 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:12:21.75 +18:38:30.5: 12.84 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.86 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:12:21.75 +18:38:30.5: ref_mag=12.86 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7902 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:29:20.35 +24:26:16.1: 13.22 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:09:48.78 +17:41:17.7: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:24.76 +22:49:54.1: 12.76 +/- 0.36 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.74 +/- 0.25
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:24.76 +22:49:54.1: ref_mag=12.74 +/- 0.25 new_mean_mag=13.1266 delta=-0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:13:51.16 +17:46:45.4: 12.90 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:29:20.35 +24:26:16.1: 13.22 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.22 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:29:20.35 +24:26:16.1: ref_mag=13.22 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9360 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:08:26.81 +23:15:05.9: 13.37 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:07:01.39 +20:29:00.8: 13.72 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:13:51.16 +17:46:45.4: 12.84 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.86 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:13:51.16 +17:46:45.4: ref_mag=12.86 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.9260 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:24:58.74 +26:29:29.2: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:39.51 +22:49:42.5: 12.85 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:08:26.81 +23:15:05.9: 13.46 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.41 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:08:26.81 +23:15:05.9: ref_mag=13.41 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3477 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:24.73 +22:51:03.4: 12.27 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:07:01.39 +20:29:00.8: 13.72 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.72 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:07:01.39 +20:29:00.8: ref_mag=13.72 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3041 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:29.34 +22:51:11.3: 13.65 +/- 0.35 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:24:58.74 +26:29:29.2: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:39.51 +22:49:42.5: 12.93 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.89 +/- 0.19
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:39.51 +22:49:42.5: ref_mag=12.89 +/- 0.19 new_mean_mag=13.5395 delta=-0.65 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:24.73 +22:51:03.4: 12.29 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:49.53 +23:02:57.8: 13.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:08:52.15 +24:41:37.9: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:29.34 +22:51:11.3: 13.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.65 +/- 0.35
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:29.34 +22:51:11.3: ref_mag=13.65 +/- 0.35 new_mean_mag=13.5356 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:08:52.15 +24:41:37.9: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:49.53 +23:02:57.8: 13.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:04:55.39 +24:40:03.2: 14.30 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:04:55.39 +24:40:03.2: 14.23 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.26 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:04:55.39 +24:40:03.2: ref_mag=14.26 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.3189 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_apass.txt__out176849.dat to exclusion_list_apass.txt
Adding exclusion_list_apass.txt__out176908.dat to exclusion_list_apass.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out176267.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out176456.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out176843.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out176918.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32823.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 47s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175435_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 175435_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175449_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 175449_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175452_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 175452_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:44.45 +20:07:52.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175454_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 175454_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:35.55 +22:12:22.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175461_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 175461_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:07.75 +18:14:52.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175462_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 175462_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175463_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 175463_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:41.00 +21:56:37.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175465_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 175465_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175466_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 175466_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:12.87 +20:54:00.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175468_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 175468_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:34.81 +20:54:46.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175471_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 175471_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:14.95 +18:59:00.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175472_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 175472_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:05.46 +26:01:15.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175475_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 175475_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:08.39 +18:48:36.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175478_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 175478_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:55.84 +26:11:01.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175480_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 175480_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:08.61 +17:49:27.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175486_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 175486_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:50:31.03 +20:09:47.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175491_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 175491_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:28.51 +21:02:36.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175492_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 175492_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:26.04 +25:46:58.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175493_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 175493_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:43.28 +22:36:05.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175494_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 175494_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:12.83 +21:35:34.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175496_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 175496_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175497_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 175497_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:22.50 +17:59:27.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175498_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 175498_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175500_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 175500_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:01.20 +25:15:45.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175501_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 175501_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:17.21 +19:25:35.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175502_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 175502_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:06.89 +20:04:17.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175507_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 175507_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:19.28 +22:46:53.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175509_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 175509_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:26.18 +20:27:40.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175510_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 175510_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:27.74 +19:32:34.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175661_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 175661_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175701_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 175701_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:04.57 +22:51:50.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175752_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 175752_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:38.63 +19:12:52.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175753_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 175753_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175774_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 175774_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:12.54 +22:52:40.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175792_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 175792_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:19.21 +24:07:15.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175794_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 175794_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:49.39 +19:28:18.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175803_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 175803_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:25.16 +22:38:50.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175844_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 175844_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:57.37 +22:56:38.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175872_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 175872_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:40.93 +19:13:20.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175900_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 175900_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:54:52.17 +26:07:15.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175935_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 175935_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175944_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 175944_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175977_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 175977_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:48.10 +17:59:35.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175984_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 175984_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176018_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 176018_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:54.05 +23:37:29.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176036_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 176036_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:48.79 +19:51:01.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176042_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 176042_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:53.91 +20:58:50.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176048_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 176048_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:37.36 +26:03:26.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176077_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 176077_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:33.04 +22:42:06.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176090_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 176090_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:43:57.66 +25:46:40.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176101_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 176101_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:13.11 +18:03:50.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176111_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 176111_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:22.80 +25:23:47.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176121_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 176121_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:54:05.03 +19:40:00.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176123_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 176123_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176144_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 176144_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:48.26 +24:16:06.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176150_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 176150_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:54:26.84 +20:36:53.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176152_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 176152_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:02.85 +23:25:47.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176157_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 176157_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:40.82 +22:57:36.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176163_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 176163_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:46.90 +22:42:06.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176168_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 176168_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:49.58 +25:29:28.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176183_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 176183_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176190_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 176190_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:20.34 +26:22:27.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176191_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 176191_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:13.62 +24:40:50.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176218_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 176218_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:06.35 +18:39:19.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176228_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 176228_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:36.99 +17:45:37.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176232_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 176232_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:43:14.46 +22:23:11.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176239_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 176239_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:08.05 +21:35:21.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176260_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 176260_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:15.34 +21:47:42.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176266_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 176266_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:36:01.19 +26:51:14.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176267_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
Preparing report for the candidate 176267_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176275_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 176275_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:45.89 +23:26:50.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176284_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 176284_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176287_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 176287_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:45.83 +25:33:04.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176288_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 176288_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:42.49 +21:18:40.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176292_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 176292_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:46:15.07 +18:30:19.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176295_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 176295_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176313_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 176313_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176332_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 176332_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:45.92 +23:15:01.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176343_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 176343_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:00.17 +22:57:32.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176385_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 176385_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:42.17 +22:10:16.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176392_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 176392_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:50.78 +18:51:18.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176398_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 176398_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176400_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 176400_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:23.11 +22:43:57.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176402_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 176402_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176415_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 176415_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:25.63 +26:31:46.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176423_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 176423_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:10.10 +22:52:11.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176450_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 176450_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:21:48.49 +20:26:14.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176451_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 176451_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176456_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
Preparing report for the candidate 176456_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176497_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 176497_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:00.36 +20:48:36.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176503_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 176503_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176533_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 176533_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:21:57.47 +20:28:24.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176556_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 176556_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:55.09 +24:28:14.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176567_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 176567_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:19.28 +22:04:40.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176575_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 176575_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176579_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 176579_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:32:08.69 +23:56:51.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176585_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 176585_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:43.82 +22:49:12.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176598_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 176598_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:22.40 +20:30:17.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176613_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 176613_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:48.43 +21:56:29.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176663_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 176663_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176687_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 176687_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:43.16 +22:57:51.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176716_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 176716_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:11.17 +22:51:42.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176724_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 176724_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176739_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 176739_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:03.44 +19:28:24.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176740_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 176740_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176779_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 176779_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:48.08 +21:45:35.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176799_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 176799_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:11.13 +24:39:05.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176840_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 176840_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176843_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
Preparing report for the candidate 176843_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176849_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 176849_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:24.73 +22:51:03.4 in APASS (TIMEOUTCOMMAND_GAIA_VIZIER=#timeout 40 #, MAG_MEAN=13.67, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.65)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176851_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 176851_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:06.80 +21:00:17.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176892_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 176892_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176908_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 176908_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:49.53 +23:02:57.8 in APASS (TIMEOUTCOMMAND_GAIA_VIZIER=#timeout 40 #, MAG_MEAN=13.92, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.90)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176918_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
Preparing report for the candidate 176918_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109628_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 109628_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (44.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05956_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 05956_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:12.43 +26:47:35.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15633_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 15633_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:34.09 +25:59:42.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163920_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 163920_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:34.49 +24:13:20.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32823_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
Preparing report for the candidate 32823_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66489_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
Preparing report for the candidate 66489_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120103_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 120103_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:29:21.53 +18:06:04.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100568_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 100568_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:31.10 +20:02:07.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63916_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 63916_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (43.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31522_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 31522_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:44:26.52 +24:23:48.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149418_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 149418_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:39:28.48 +17:40:29.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126593_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166
The candidate 126593_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-49-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166 did not pass the final checks
