Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 08 16.4258  2461268.9258  12.23  02:57:09.47 +09:31:37.0
167.01366 -42.33490 galactic  Cet  Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.5" and 5.2 pix   This object is listed in comets.txt   20.6"  17.6mag 220P/McNaught
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
20.6" 17.6mag  220P/McNaught
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits


fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits


fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs  wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits  wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits -crosshair 375.95859 5115.02490 image    wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits -crosshair 381.10529 5114.41357 image   

./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 08 16.42582 02 57 09.47 +09 31 37.0          12.2 R      V36

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 08 16.42555 02 57 09.43 +09 31 38.0          12.2 R      V36
     TAU0008  C2026 08 16.42610 02 57 09.52 +09 31 36.0          12.2 R      V36

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 08 16.4258*  02 57 09.47 +09 31 37.0  12.2 U             Cet       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461268.9258,12.23,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260816.4258 12.23CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 08 16.4258  2461268.9258  12.73  03:00:44.96 +03:44:12.9
173.26574 -46.11428 galactic  Cet  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 4.9 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
129 Antigone                -1     -0       1  12.9    -0   -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:00:44.96 +03:44:12.9:  15.96 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:00:44.96 +03:44:12.9:  15.74 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits


fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits


fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs  wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits  wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits -crosshair 1083.94519 1623.08887 image    wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits -crosshair 1088.85583 1622.89832 image   

./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 08 16.42582 03 00 44.96 +03 44 12.9          12.7 R      V36

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 08 16.42555 03 00 44.97 +03 44 12.9          12.7 R      V36
     TAU0008  C2026 08 16.42610 03 00 44.96 +03 44 12.9          12.7 R      V36

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 08 16.4258*  03 00 44.96 +03 44 12.9  12.7 U             Cet       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461268.9258,12.73,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260816.4258 12.73CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 08 16.4258  2461268.9258  13.88  02:56:21.37 +03:46:42.5
172.05869 -46.82966 galactic  Cet  Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 5.1 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
464 Megaira                 -0      0       0  14.0     0    0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 02:56:21.37 +03:46:42.5:  15.93 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 02:56:21.37 +03:46:42.5:  15.71 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits


fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits


fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs  wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits  wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits -crosshair 410.18390 1613.78125 image    wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits -crosshair 415.26099 1613.34436 image   

./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 08 16.42582 02 56 21.37 +03 46 42.5          13.9 R      V36

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 08 16.42555 02 56 21.34 +03 46 43.2          13.9 R      V36
     TAU0008  C2026 08 16.42610 02 56 21.39 +03 46 41.9          13.9 R      V36

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 08 16.4258*  02 56 21.37 +03 46 42.5  13.9 U             Cet       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461268.9258,13.88,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260816.4258 13.88CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 08 16.4258  2461268.9258  14.23  03:46:41.09 +05:52:51.3
181.64409 -36.30839 galactic  Tau  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 4.9 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
483 Seppina                  1      0       1  14.5     0    0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:46:41.09 +05:52:51.3:  16.06 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:46:41.09 +05:52:51.3:  15.91 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits


fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits


fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs  wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits  wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits -crosshair 7919.53174 3316.05859 image    wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits -crosshair 7924.47754 3315.93384 image   

./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 08 16.42582 03 46 41.09 +05 52 51.3          14.2 R      V36

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 08 16.42555 03 46 41.08 +05 52 51.3          14.1 R      V36
     TAU0008  C2026 08 16.42610 03 46 41.09 +05 52 51.2          14.3 R      V36

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 08 16.4258*  03 46 41.09 +05 52 51.3  14.2 U             Tau       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461268.9258,14.23,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260816.4258 14.23CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field Tau-07-Q1b1x1 reference image: Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
Field Tau-07-Q1b1x1 reference image: Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Field Tau-07-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
Field Tau-07-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461049.66635515 09.01.2026 03:59:23.085   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
First image: 2461049.66635515 09.01.2026 03:59:23.085   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
Last  image: 2461268.92609606 16.08.2026 10:13:24.700   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 2
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.59
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  10.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     55000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.37            # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  6463
Objects passed selection criteria:  6458
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.5    4.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.5    4.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 5888
Average stars matched: 5801.75 (98.5352 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   232784 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Sun Aug 16 05:16:37 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461049.66635515 09.01.2026 03:59:23.085   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
First image: 2461049.66635515 09.01.2026 03:59:23.085   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
Last  image: 2461268.92609606 16.08.2026 10:13:24.700   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 159
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.32
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 9 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  2.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     57000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.83            # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  36697
Objects passed selection criteria:  36615
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.5    4.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.5    4.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 33803.2
Average stars matched: 33153.8 (98.0786 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   259268 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Sun Aug 16 05:17:18 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Tau-07-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Tau-07-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Tau-07-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 846303 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 846303 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 

Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:

MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes


renamed 'Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.png' -> 'transient_report/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits_preview.png'

Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits


renamed 'Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.png' -> 'transient_report/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits_preview.png'

Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits




Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 611.0058
INFO:         REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 549.3758
INFO:    SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1311.4131
INFO:            SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 515.8982
INFO:   SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1310.6997
INFO:           SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 516.6769
----------------------------------------------
INFO:      ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.14632
INFO:                  SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.002
INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 23.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits 
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-16T05:12:37.6022143' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-16T10:12:37.6022143' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61268.4254352082 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-16T10:12:47.5088373' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =      61268.425549861 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     51.4275574572716 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =     6.00011200965971 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     46.9366666666667 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     121.860277777778 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     1.36755131373933 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =     33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=    -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'Tau-07'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '03 25 43'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+06 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                29529 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                29529 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                 14.8 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 58.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=               905.59 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 23.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                 36.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=             9.400752 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =             5.400432 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/d_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits :)

Spent 0.508055 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/d_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 23.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits 
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-16T05:13:24.7002312' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-16T10:13:24.7002312' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61268.4259803239 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-16T10:13:34.6050717' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61268.4260949651 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     51.4275574012097 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =     6.00011199693358 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     47.0791666666667 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     122.068333333333 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     1.36439477918946 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =     33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=    -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'Tau-07'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '03 25 43'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+06 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                29529 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                29529 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                 14.8 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 58.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=               905.59 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 23.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                 36.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=             9.400752 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =             5.400432 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/d_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits :)

Spent 0.471658 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/d_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:


fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits



fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits




Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1

  ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461268.92555095
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.1'  15.7(deg)x10.5(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:25:45.853 +05:58:58.33 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:25:49.821 +06:00:20.42 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:25:45.853 +05:58:58.33
Second-epoch image center 03:25:49.821 +06:00:20.42
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0281 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:25:47.885 +06:00:23.06 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:25:45.853 +05:58:58.33
Second-epoch image center 03:25:47.885 +06:00:23.06
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0250 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  03:25:49.821 +06:00:20.42
Second-epoch second image center 03:25:47.885 +06:00:23.06
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00806 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Frc0KeCleI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LoUSmr9SdE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lV6F5pPPIG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZTSWnDxPcN
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits and wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits and wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat 
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits and wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6894 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 43.4390 to 59.4125 deg, Dec +0.6809 to +11.2623 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 43.4390 to 59.4125 deg, Dec 0.6809 to 11.2623 deg
Loaded 4344 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3518 out of 3704 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3704 out of 6894 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.929400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.929400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.59
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.34

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.34

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6894 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 43.4390 to 59.4125 deg, Dec +0.6809 to +11.2623 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 43.4390 to 59.4125 deg, Dec 0.6809 to 11.2623 deg
Loaded 4344 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3518 out of 3704 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3704 out of 6894 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 6511 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 43.4391 to 59.4125 deg, Dec +0.6696 to +11.2487 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 43.4391 to 59.4125 deg, Dec 0.6696 to 11.2487 deg
Loaded 4348 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3541 out of 3691 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3691 out of 6511 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.0 pix  Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
 2.1 pix  Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
 2.3 pix  fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
 2.3 pix  fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.3 mag.  Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
 15.2 mag.  Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
 14.8 mag.  fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
 14.8 mag.  fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  14.8 (SNR )  11.9 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.Frc0KeCleI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=524, bad_region=0, passed=6894
Got 6894 stars (including 6363 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6894 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4880 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4875 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6894 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4880 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6894 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6894 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" 
Excluding outliers - 4875 stars left (next iteration limit 5362)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits N_match=4875 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.283 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.285 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.268 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.232 n_q1=1258 n_q2=1017 n_q3=1321 n_q4=1279 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.316
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits -region wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.LoUSmr9SdE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=474, bad_region=1, passed=6511
Got 6511 stars (including 6031 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6511 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4884 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4880 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6511 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4884 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6511 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6511 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" 
Excluding outliers - 4880 stars left (next iteration limit 5368)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits N_match=4880 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.290 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.299 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.272 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.237 n_q1=1260 n_q2=1041 n_q3=1292 n_q4=1287 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.274
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits -region wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.lV6F5pPPIG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=323, bad_region=0, passed=5113
Got 5113 stars (including 4786 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5113 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 509 (Dec 0.4 to 11.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4672 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4667 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4667 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4667 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5113 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 509 (Dec 0.4 to 11.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4673 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4668 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5113 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4668 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5113 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Excluding outliers - 4668 stars left (next iteration limit 5133)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4668 robust_rms=12.305 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.998 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4668 robust_rms=0.393 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.396 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4668 robust_rms=0.277 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.285 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4668 robust_rms_before=0.983 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.283 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.277 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.292 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.285
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.292 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits N_match=4668 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.291 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.285 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.292 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.290 n_q1=1238 n_q2=1278 n_q3=956 n_q4=1196 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.050
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ZTSWnDxPcN (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=315, bad_region=0, passed=5173
Got 5173 stars (including 4856 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5173 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 509 (Dec 0.5 to 11.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4746 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4740 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4740 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4740 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5173 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 509 (Dec 0.5 to 11.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4748 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4742 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5173 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4742 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5173 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" 
Excluding outliers - 4742 stars left (next iteration limit 5214)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4742 robust_rms=12.252 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.902 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4742 robust_rms=0.375 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.389 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4742 robust_rms=0.255 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.264 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4742 robust_rms_before=0.971 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.256 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.255 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.265 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.264
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.265 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits N_match=4742 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.270 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.251 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.266 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.257 n_q1=1272 n_q2=1281 n_q3=985 n_q4=1204 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.031
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits sigma_overall=0.283 worst_q_ratio=1.316
ref2=Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits sigma_overall=0.290 worst_q_ratio=1.274
new1=fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits sigma_overall=0.291 worst_q_ratio=1.050
new2=fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits sigma_overall=0.270 worst_q_ratio=1.031
reference average sigma_overall=0.2865 worst_q_ratio=1.295
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################

Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129_astrometric_residuals.png (4875 matched stars from wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164_astrometric_residuals.png (4880 matched stars from wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129_astrometric_residuals.png (4668 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130_astrometric_residuals.png (4742 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)


Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 02:54:20.94 +03:19:44.4:  99.00 +/- 99.00  edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 02:54:20.94 +03:19:44.4:  99.00 +/- 99.00  edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:54:20.94 +03:19:44.4: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20266_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 20266_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 16.42555    2461268.92555    11.62    02:54:20.93 +03:19:44.6   0113 1324   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    11.65    02:54:20.95 +03:19:44.3   0118 1324   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL

  ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.1'  15.7(deg)x10.5(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:25:45.853 +05:58:58.33 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:25:49.821 +06:00:20.42 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:25:45.853 +05:58:58.33
Second-epoch image center 03:25:49.821 +06:00:20.42
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0281 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:25:47.885 +06:00:23.06 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:25:45.853 +05:58:58.33
Second-epoch image center 03:25:47.885 +06:00:23.06
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0250 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  03:25:49.821 +06:00:20.42
Second-epoch second image center 03:25:47.885 +06:00:23.06
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00806 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uuWC4rOFHM
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KAowRVWa4W
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3GXhXsnIa5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FiSV3t6COE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits and wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits and wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat 
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits and wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 40138 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 43.4339 to 59.4138 deg, Dec +0.6809 to +11.2698 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 43.4339 to 59.4138 deg, Dec 0.6809 to 11.2698 deg
Loaded 4347 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3388 out of 3752 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3752 out of 40138 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.819500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.819500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.32
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.50

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.50

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 40138 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 43.4339 to 59.4138 deg, Dec +0.6809 to +11.2698 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 43.4339 to 59.4138 deg, Dec 0.6809 to 11.2698 deg
Loaded 4347 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3388 out of 3752 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3752 out of 40138 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 36794 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 43.4364 to 59.4140 deg, Dec +0.6695 to +11.2585 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 43.4364 to 59.4140 deg, Dec 0.6695 to 11.2585 deg
Loaded 4354 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3421 out of 3757 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3757 out of 36794 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits (aperture=4.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 146 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 1.9 pix  Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
 2.0 pix  Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
 2.2 pix  fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
 2.3 pix  fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.5 mag.  Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
 15.4 mag.  Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
 15.0 mag.  fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
 15.0 mag.  fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  15.0 (SNR )  14.4 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.uuWC4rOFHM (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=1702, bad_region=4, passed=40128
Got 40128 stars (including 38357 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 40128 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4883 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4880 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40128 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4883 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40128 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40128 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" 
Excluding outliers - 4880 stars left (next iteration limit 5368)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits N_match=4880 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.263 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.230 n_q1=1244 n_q2=1018 n_q3=1335 n_q4=1283 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.315
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits -region wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.KAowRVWa4W (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=1580, bad_region=2, passed=36779
Got 36779 stars (including 35146 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 36779 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4884 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4881 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36779 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4884 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36779 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36779 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" 
Excluding outliers - 4881 stars left (next iteration limit 5369)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits N_match=4881 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.287 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.261 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.238 n_q1=1241 n_q2=1030 n_q3=1302 n_q4=1308 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.269
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits -region wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.3GXhXsnIa5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=971, bad_region=28, passed=29793
Got 29793 stars (including 28735 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29793 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4884 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4880 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29793 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4884 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29793 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29793 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" 
Excluding outliers - 4880 stars left (next iteration limit 5368)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4880 robust_rms=11.656 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.427 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4880 robust_rms=0.387 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.399 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4880 robust_rms=0.273 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.279 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4880 robust_rms_before=0.974 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.280 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.273 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.284 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.279
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.284 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits N_match=4880 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.289 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.286 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.273 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.289 n_q1=1325 n_q2=1281 n_q3=1022 n_q4=1252 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.038
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.FiSV3t6COE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=940, bad_region=32, passed=29471
Got 29471 stars (including 28439 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29471 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4885 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4881 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29471 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4885 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29471 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29471 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" 
Excluding outliers - 4881 stars left (next iteration limit 5369)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4881 robust_rms=11.752 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.872 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4881 robust_rms=0.374 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.393 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4881 robust_rms=0.255 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.266 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4881 robust_rms_before=0.967 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.253 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.255 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.269 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.266
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.269 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits N_match=4881 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.267 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.248 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.255 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.256 n_q1=1329 n_q2=1278 n_q3=1033 n_q4=1241 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.046
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/wcs_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:31:05.28 +04:53:07.1:  14.88 +/- 0.11  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:16:28.65 +04:31:02.6:  13.88 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:14:21.20 +10:20:54.3:  12.92 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:04:36.96 +06:44:21.8:  14.23 +/- 0.07  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:16:28.65 +04:31:02.6:  13.80 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:31:05.28 +04:53:07.1:  14.76 +/- 0.11  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:04:36.96 +06:44:21.8:  14.21 +/- 0.08  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:14:21.20 +10:20:54.3:  12.87 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.82 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.84 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.90 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.22 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:31:05.28 +04:53:07.1: ref_mag=14.82 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.4813 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:16:28.65 +04:31:02.6: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9526 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:14:21.20 +10:20:54.3: ref_mag=12.90 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2566 delta=-0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:04:36.96 +06:44:21.8: ref_mag=14.22 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.5223 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:00:44.96 +03:44:12.9:  15.96 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:00:44.96 +03:44:12.9:  15.74 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:14:33.05 +01:07:08.6:  13.62 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:14:33.05 +01:07:08.6:  13.48 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.55 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:14:33.05 +01:07:08.6: ref_mag=13.55 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6146 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 02:56:21.37 +03:46:42.5:  15.93 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:05:35.19 +06:07:56.5:  14.09 +/- 0.07  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:48:18.03 +08:47:53.6:  13.61 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 02:56:21.37 +03:46:42.5:  15.71 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:05:35.19 +06:07:56.5:  14.05 +/- 0.08  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.07 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:05:35.19 +06:07:56.5: ref_mag=14.07 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9756 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:48:18.03 +08:47:53.6:  13.80 +/- 0.06  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.68 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:48:18.03 +08:47:53.6: ref_mag=13.68 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8336 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:46:41.09 +05:52:51.3:  16.06 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:46:41.09 +05:52:51.3:  15.91 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:12:43.12 +08:25:27.0:  14.12 +/- 0.06  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 02:55:53.67 +05:36:45.6:  15.05 +/- 0.17  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:12:43.12 +08:25:27.0:  14.26 +/- 0.08  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.17 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:12:43.12 +08:25:27.0: ref_mag=14.17 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3158 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 02:55:53.67 +05:36:45.6:  14.78 +/- 0.17  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.91 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:55:53.67 +05:36:45.6: ref_mag=14.91 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5397 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-59-23_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits at 03:20:40.90 +09:34:54.0:  15.32 +/- 0.17  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_22-38-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 03:20:40.90 +09:34:54.0:  14.99 +/- 0.14  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  15.12 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:20:40.90 +09:34:54.0: ref_mag=15.12 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.9016 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out51621.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out51928.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52077.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51398_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 51398_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    14.89    03:26:57.98 +02:08:47.2   5099 0882   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51399_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 51399_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    14.95    03:00:49.32 +07:58:25.0   0981 4191   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51401_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 51401_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 16.42555    2461268.92555    14.76    03:04:36.94 +06:44:21.4   1586 3469   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    14.39    03:04:36.97 +06:44:22.1   1591 3469   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51403_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 51403_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 16.42555    2461268.92555    14.51    03:31:05.20 +04:53:07.7   5614 2569   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    14.46    03:31:05.36 +04:53:06.6   5620 2568   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51407_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 51407_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    14.21    02:57:23.24 +03:43:12.0   0575 1586   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51412_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 51412_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 16.42555    2461268.92555    13.90    03:16:28.63 +04:31:01.9   3439 2222   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    14.02    03:16:28.66 +04:31:03.3   3444 2222   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51413_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 51413_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    13.66    03:24:30.31 +02:06:39.1   4730 0839   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

**** FOUND  03:24:30.36 +02:06:39.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51416_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 51416_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 16.42555    2461268.92555    13.33    03:14:21.18 +10:20:53.8   2934 5721   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    13.20    03:14:21.22 +10:20:54.7   2939 5721   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51458_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 51458_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    10.84    03:19:06.10 +07:55:57.5   3725 4297   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51482_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 51482_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    11.35    03:21:46.52 +03:48:28.0   4262 1839   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51493_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 51493_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    11.54    03:14:54.63 +08:27:10.4   3083 4578   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51501_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 51501_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    11.53    03:50:16.64 +03:11:41.2   8582 1727   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51518_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 51518_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    11.81    03:06:42.22 +02:38:11.0   2026 1004   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51525_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 51525_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    11.86    03:23:22.45 +10:30:25.1   4273 5886   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51531_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 51531_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    11.94    03:26:15.91 +03:11:13.8   4957 1504   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51547_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
Preparing report for the candidate 51547_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51554_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 51554_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    12.28    03:04:12.13 +07:58:37.4   1492 4215   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51566_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 51566_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    12.26    03:30:22.52 +09:38:20.9   5342 5422   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51577_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 51577_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    12.34    03:01:25.46 +03:35:05.6   1196 1536   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51579_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 51579_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    12.29    03:24:40.82 +00:54:26.5   4798 0111   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51600_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 51600_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    12.61    02:56:20.99 +01:20:07.4   0477 0121   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51606_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 51606_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    12.76    03:43:17.66 +05:56:02.9   7411 3314   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51621_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
Preparing report for the candidate 51621_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51622_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 51622_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    12.68    03:24:59.89 +11:04:47.1   4494 6247   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51630_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 51630_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    12.61    03:31:27.35 +03:26:59.7   5727 1708   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51664_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 51664_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    12.76    03:47:32.74 +06:40:47.0   8022 3807   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51681_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 51681_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    12.98    03:07:19.98 +05:01:14.4   2052 2451   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

**** FOUND  03:07:19.98 +05:01:14.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51683_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 51683_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    13.00    03:00:02.63 +05:12:13.2   0941 2507   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51697_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 51697_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    12.84    03:55:01.57 +07:32:29.8   9120 4411   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51733_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 51733_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    13.26    02:56:11.47 +08:57:33.1   0250 4763   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51735_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 51735_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    13.07    03:54:47.35 +09:11:53.8   9014 5415   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

**** FOUND  03:54:47.34 +09:11:53.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51745_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 51745_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    13.21    02:56:48.33 +10:22:53.1   0303 5635   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51748_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 51748_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    13.28    03:04:20.93 +10:02:54.6   1452 5473   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51752_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 51752_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    13.30    02:59:13.90 +02:43:40.6   0884 0997   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51760_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 51760_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    13.16    02:56:42.11 +08:29:12.3   0341 4478   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51767_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 51767_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    13.25    02:55:31.50 +08:08:47.3   0171 4264   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51779_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 51779_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    13.20    03:04:43.34 +02:42:00.4   1723 1026   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51785_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 51785_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    13.12    02:59:50.94 +10:02:23.4   0774 5442   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51802_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 51802_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    13.11    03:54:41.30 +06:02:16.1   9133 3495   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51805_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 51805_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    13.29    02:59:57.03 +01:25:01.0   1029 0203   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51809_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 51809_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    13.61    03:03:09.06 +05:40:22.7   1400 2814   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51811_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 51811_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    13.17    03:47:35.30 +02:49:21.6   8188 1476   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51816_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 51816_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    13.46    03:07:16.52 +05:49:57.0   2019 2941   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51818_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 51818_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    13.41    02:58:54.16 +06:28:37.9   0732 3271   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51819_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 51819_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    13.45    03:19:51.87 +09:03:38.8   3801 4983   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51827_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 51827_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    13.69    02:58:12.57 +03:20:34.1   0711 1363   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51828_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 51828_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    13.56    02:56:32.37 +07:18:11.1   0349 3757   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51829_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 51829_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    13.30    02:55:39.38 +04:41:07.0   0284 2160   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51832_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 51832_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    13.33    02:54:50.71 +03:32:16.2   0189 1455   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51841_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 51841_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    13.40    03:01:02.61 +04:46:43.6   1105 2257   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51843_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 51843_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 16.42555    2461268.92555    13.55    03:14:33.02 +01:07:08.8   3256 0151   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    13.71    03:14:33.08 +01:07:08.4   3261 0151   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51845_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 51845_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    13.60    03:14:18.13 +02:05:19.4   3193 0737   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51853_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 51853_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    13.50    02:55:23.25 +06:33:42.3   0193 3299   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51862_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 51862_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    13.41    03:29:48.97 +09:53:26.8   5250 5569   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51874_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 51874_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    14.02    02:59:52.68 +08:38:24.8   0819 4590   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51879_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 51879_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    13.73    03:23:52.56 +00:58:59.4   4674 0150   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51886_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 51886_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    13.49    03:54:18.74 +04:05:31.6   9160 2311   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51895_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 51895_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    13.71    03:33:49.03 +09:41:15.9   5851 5484   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

**** FOUND  03:33:49.03 +09:41:15.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51900_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 51900_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    13.61    03:05:44.50 +01:28:14.8   1913 0287   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51905_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 51905_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    13.55    03:15:47.96 +10:11:18.9   3159 5634   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51907_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 51907_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    13.80    03:07:10.98 +10:15:12.5   1871 5615   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51913_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 51913_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    13.68    03:30:33.16 +03:21:01.5   5595 1640   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51914_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 51914_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    13.69    03:15:32.19 +01:41:24.8   3392 0506   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

**** FOUND  03:15:32.11 +01:41:24.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51923_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 51923_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    13.79    03:06:20.19 +09:06:52.1   1779 4918   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51928_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
Preparing report for the candidate 51928_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51931_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 51931_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    13.68    03:56:10.30 +10:06:43.4   9185 5990   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51944_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 51944_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 16.42555    2461268.92555    13.90    03:05:35.10 +06:07:57.4   1750 3110   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    14.08    03:05:35.28 +06:07:55.6   1755 3109   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51947_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 51947_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    13.80    02:59:16.50 +03:14:17.7   0877 1308   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51950_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 51950_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    13.92    03:05:08.68 +10:27:29.1   1559 5727   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51954_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 51954_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 16.42555    2461268.92555    13.84    03:48:18.00 +08:47:53.2   8045 5096   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    13.83    03:48:18.07 +08:47:54.1   8050 5097   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51955_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 51955_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    13.62    03:42:47.09 +03:00:48.1   7451 1547   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51963_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 51963_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    13.65    03:54:37.74 +07:02:17.6   9081 4101   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51964_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 51964_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    13.77    03:48:41.89 +07:26:26.0   8165 4279   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51967_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 51967_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    14.10    03:01:09.27 +02:50:40.4   1175 1084   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51969_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 51969_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    13.76    03:33:44.63 +08:38:27.7   5879 4851   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51974_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 51974_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    13.87    03:49:54.19 +09:59:13.9   8243 5837   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51976_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 51976_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    13.88    03:46:49.14 +03:13:44.1   8054 1715   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51983_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 51983_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    13.85    03:54:27.60 +05:47:10.4   9109 3340   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51987_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 51987_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    14.11    03:13:46.65 +11:01:08.2   2831 6124   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51998_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 51998_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    13.70    02:59:44.81 +10:26:01.6   0747 5682   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52003_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 52003_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    13.87    03:01:58.77 +11:05:40.7   1064 6098   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52004_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 52004_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    13.76    03:30:32.54 +01:05:28.9   5676 0274   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52006_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 52006_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    14.14    03:12:04.23 +10:21:37.9   2598 5712   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52019_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 52019_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    13.95    03:10:08.34 +11:12:05.3   2283 6211   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52026_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 52026_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    14.10    03:20:11.32 +08:08:32.6   3880 4432   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52032_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 52032_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    13.92    03:39:00.23 +04:57:18.5   6804 2683   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52048_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 52048_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    14.36    03:02:54.92 +11:08:08.0   1204 6128   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52049_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 52049_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    14.03    03:49:07.58 +10:20:13.9   8112 6041   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52057_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 52057_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    13.99    03:48:12.26 +02:20:43.0   8302 1192   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52073_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 52073_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    13.94    03:16:50.95 +10:35:04.7   3302 5882   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52077_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
Preparing report for the candidate 52077_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52078_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 52078_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    14.62    03:03:08.84 +07:06:57.1   1358 3687   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52082_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 52082_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    14.29    03:50:56.27 +10:32:45.6   8376 6190   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52087_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 52087_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    14.41    03:17:00.77 +01:13:14.1   3630 0234   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52091_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 52091_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    14.51    03:19:39.32 +05:57:22.3   3873 3113   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52093_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 52093_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    14.28    03:07:54.60 +07:01:22.3   2079 3664   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52103_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 52103_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    14.12    03:36:45.18 +10:47:14.1   6247 6179   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52104_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 52104_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    14.44    03:00:56.86 +09:49:58.6   0946 5322   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52107_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 52107_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    13.98    03:16:30.61 +06:55:53.5   3371 3674   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52109_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 52109_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    14.16    03:07:39.50 +09:27:11.7   1967 5132   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52121_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 52121_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    14.34    03:03:55.92 +07:10:13.3   1475 3725   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52129_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 52129_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    14.31    03:48:54.54 +09:18:25.5   8121 5412   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52136_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 52136_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    13.99    03:42:40.97 +03:24:01.2   7420 1780   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52139_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 52139_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    14.36    02:54:43.25 +04:25:32.3   0147 1995   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52140_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 52140_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    14.30    03:49:02.44 +07:02:38.7   8233 4043   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52145_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 52145_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    14.52    03:08:52.00 +08:54:18.7   2165 4808   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52165_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 52165_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    14.36    03:11:03.54 +03:37:37.3   2656 1640   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52167_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 52167_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    14.43    03:41:36.75 +02:24:23.2   7298 1169   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52168_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 52168_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    14.38    03:02:40.85 +09:40:48.8   1212 5239   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52173_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 52173_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    14.06    03:47:55.63 +07:05:13.0   8063 4057   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52181_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 52181_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    14.34    03:49:20.64 +02:10:54.1   8483 1103   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52183_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 52183_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    14.59    03:14:47.34 +04:12:26.9   3200 2021   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52188_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 52188_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 16.42555    2461268.92555    14.42    03:12:43.15 +08:25:28.3   2752 4545   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    14.24    03:12:43.10 +08:25:25.7   2757 4544   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52193_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 52193_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    14.48    03:15:46.06 +04:22:00.2   3342 2125   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52203_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 52203_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 16.42555    2461268.92555    14.51    02:55:53.62 +05:36:45.3   0291 2726   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    14.58    02:55:53.72 +05:36:46.0   0296 2726   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52206_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 52206_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    14.49    03:04:11.20 +08:26:16.5   1476 4494   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52212_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 52212_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    14.39    03:00:32.36 +01:50:31.8   1108 0468   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52214_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 52214_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    14.74    03:46:37.03 +06:59:16.0   7869 3983   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52233_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 52233_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    14.78    03:36:50.02 +02:37:52.4   6567 1262   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52240_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 52240_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    14.15    03:44:06.82 +09:18:40.0   7401 5361   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52243_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 52243_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    14.62    03:47:28.47 +10:08:08.1   7872 5899   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52250_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 52250_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    14.32    03:08:15.45 +08:07:00.7   2098 4327   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52258_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 52258_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    14.52    03:29:30.14 +01:03:50.4   5520 0248   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52261_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 52261_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    14.61    03:12:15.12 +07:20:11.5   2721 3885   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52264_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 52264_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    14.52    03:29:47.62 +07:45:23.7   5323 4282   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52266_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 52266_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    14.73    03:41:20.51 +07:57:03.4   7039 4510   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52270_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 52270_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    14.50    03:29:14.46 +09:07:22.3   5192 5100   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52279_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 52279_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    14.28    03:00:53.93 +04:38:01.3   1087 2168   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52287_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 52287_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    14.19    03:44:24.51 +01:58:08.6   7740 0929   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52294_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 52294_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    14.43    03:20:24.20 +10:23:58.6   3836 5797   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52298_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 52298_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    14.34    03:22:45.76 +07:17:33.9   4292 3942   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52303_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 52303_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    14.46    03:27:58.63 +08:50:53.5   5014 4923   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52307_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 52307_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    14.88    03:13:17.57 +10:09:01.8   2787 5593   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52313_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 52313_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    14.62    03:14:08.18 +10:25:02.9   2904 5761   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52314_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 52314_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    14.38    03:42:59.23 +09:44:01.9   7216 5605   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52317_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 52317_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    14.58    03:26:10.78 +04:56:30.7   4883 2559   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52319_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 52319_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    14.75    03:26:34.75 +07:01:25.7   4870 3813   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52329_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 52329_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    14.55    03:30:06.59 +08:50:46.7   5331 4941   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52332_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 52332_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    14.67    03:05:34.82 +09:23:33.8   1657 5082   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52338_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 52338_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    14.59    03:45:33.40 +09:09:47.6   7623 5287   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52340_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 52340_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    14.91    03:09:30.32 +01:45:20.0   2477 0493   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52341_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 52341_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    14.51    03:22:17.25 +02:19:17.4   4389 0947   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52350_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 52350_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    14.56    03:41:44.96 +05:18:48.8   7203 2925   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52354_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 52354_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 16.42555    2461268.92555    14.91    03:20:40.94 +09:34:53.4   3900 5304   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0129.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    14.90    03:20:40.87 +09:34:54.6   3905 5304   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52361_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 52361_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    15.14    03:39:43.56 +01:59:13.2   7029 0898   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52369_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130
The candidate 52369_fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 16.42610    2461268.92610    14.71    03:44:10.20 +07:35:40.9   7477 4324   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_051419_TTUQ1b1x1_2145946_yHx8k3Mz/fd_Tau-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_05-13-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0130.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.9") between the two second-epoch detections
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 10s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
03:00:44.96 +03:44:12.9
02:56:21.37 +03:46:42.5
03:46:41.09 +05:52:51.3
########### Completed Tau-07-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
02:57:09.47 +09:31:37.0
03:00:44.96 +03:44:12.9
02:56:21.37 +03:46:42.5
03:46:41.09 +05:52:51.3
###################################################################################
02:57:09.47 +09:31:37.0  -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
03:00:44.96 +03:44:12.9  -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
02:56:21.37 +03:46:42.5  -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
03:46:41.09 +05:52:51.3  -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO  ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461268.92555095 -observatory V36
08:57:37.07 +18:26:17.2 Mercury (-1.4mag)
12:30:55.48 -05:00:16.8 Venus (-4.4mag)
06:12:58.78 +23:42:29.9 Mars (1.3mag)
08:50:16.81 +18:13:30.3 Jupiter (-1.8mag)
00:55:38.04 +03:08:11.1 Saturn (0.6mag)
04:12:34.24 +20:59:07.4 Uranus (5.7mag)
00:15:34.47 +00:09:22.4 Neptune (7.7mag)
20:27:22.32 -23:33:12.4 Pluto (14.5mag)
12:33:47.50 -07:47:49.6 Moon (-9.3mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Aug 16 05:16 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461268.92555095:
08:50:21.54 +18:13:10.7 Io (6.1mag)
08:50:21.48 +18:13:09.9 Europa (6.3mag)
08:50:29.70 +18:12:30.9 Ganymede (5.6mag)
08:50:16.53 +18:13:29.5 Callisto (6.8mag)
08:47:45.06 +18:17:54.8 Himalia (15.7mag)
08:50:15.25 +18:13:37.7 Thebe (16.6mag)
08:47:21.91 +18:14:51.0 Elara (17.7mag)
08:54:25.54 +17:49:15.3 Pasiphae (17.9mag)
08:52:54.51 +18:25:38.7 Carme (19.0mag)
00:55:48.63 +03:07:44.6 Titan (8.4mag)
00:55:35.80 +03:07:54.4 Rhea (9.7mag)
00:56:06.84 +03:08:41.2 Iapetus (11.1mag)
00:55:50.99 +03:07:36.1 Hyperion (14.4mag)
00:54:50.07 +03:00:19.2 Phoebe (16.4mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Aug 16 05:16 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461268.92555095:
19:39:02.26 -18:17:13.9 JWST
16:18:39.49 +46:41:13.5 Chandra
11:43:49.27 -61:07:42.7 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Aug 16 05:16 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461268.92555095 -observatory V36
03:22:31.42 +18:01:34.3 17.6mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist)
18:00:09.89 -34:33:12.8 14.1mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
07:01:17.29 -69:13:36.0 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
06:11:51.62 +33:10:18.4 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
04:06:33.78 +40:44:42.4 17.2mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
22:31:46.20 +30:52:55.3 17.3mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
06:51:27.20 +26:23:41.4 16.8mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
10:29:11.10 +28:06:21.3 17.0mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
09:34:21.47 +05:18:33.1 17.9mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
15:14:06.72 -12:37:08.7 17.9mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
21:00:16.67 +64:58:47.2 17.9mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
15:40:34.24 -13:41:41.3 14.5mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
08:17:05.19 +31:43:27.1 15.4mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:05:58.59 +15:33:34.8 17.8mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
18:53:14.96 +43:24:56.8 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
20:58:24.97 +49:35:05.3 17.5mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS)
05:21:29.86 -12:54:15.8 15.4mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
07:01:19.06 +22:41:37.8 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
10:44:32.35 +20:22:10.4 17.2mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
13:03:18.68 +01:47:10.8 16.9mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
16:04:53.13 +76:59:11.6 16.6mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
03:09:35.95 +46:18:52.2 17.2mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
11:53:41.51 +09:22:42.2 17.4mag A/2026 E1
22:06:50.80 -30:27:30.1 7.0mag 10P/Tempel
11:33:58.36 -03:55:16.5 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
11:24:23.37 +01:57:25.4 17.3mag 63P/Wild
00:53:09.40 -05:47:48.4 15.4mag 65P/Gunn
05:53:54.86 +20:29:16.1 13.7mag 78P/Gehrels
20:30:39.60 -24:25:37.1 17.6mag 84P/Giclas
03:07:58.74 +14:14:03.0 16.8mag 88P/Howell
08:16:23.26 +26:29:42.0 16.3mag 93P/Lovas
04:29:51.29 +20:04:38.6 17.4mag 112P/Urata-Niijima
06:23:26.19 +29:16:26.5 16.2mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
09:37:50.89 +25:12:24.9 14.9mag 123P/West-Hartley
12:00:16.96 -13:23:28.3 17.2mag 124P/Mrkos
05:48:28.03 +21:07:03.2 16.0mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
06:42:19.82 +18:27:56.0 17.9mag 131P/Mueller
00:01:34.08 +03:16:22.7 17.5mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma
03:15:43.73 -18:51:12.4 13.3mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
07:44:06.60 +38:05:31.6 16.0mag 162P/Siding Spring
12:28:43.12 +38:01:24.0 12.0mag 169P/NEAT
02:57:10.78 +09:31:44.1 17.6mag 220P/McNaught
16:46:27.38 -10:41:46.0 17.9mag 235P/LINEAR
20:17:56.82 -52:26:07.3 17.9mag 259P/Garradd
03:46:03.66 +28:32:23.0 15.3mag 260P/McNaught
07:29:56.03 +37:25:46.8 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR
15:13:30.21 +02:13:30.5 17.8mag 391P/Kowalski
09:08:21.57 +17:58:07.5 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.3K Aug 16 05:16 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40  AT2026wdy  2026-08-5.05 16.08
22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90  AT2026wek  2026-08-3.82 17.17
14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60  ASASSN-26ev  2026-08-2.15 14.02
12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20  SN2026wgm  2026-08-1.73 15.61
16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00  ASASSN-26er  2026-07-25.82 15.09
01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00  SN2026vbh  2026-07-25.61 15.97
21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90  ASASSN-26eq  2026-07-24.37 15.13
18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60  ASASSN-26ep  2026-07-23.47 -4.06
12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50  ASASSN-26et  2026-07-22.76 13.98
13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60  SN2026uwk  2026-07-21.75 16.38
18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90  ASASSN-26en  2026-07-21.77 14.63
14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10  ASASSN-26es  2026-07-20.79 15.36
20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00  ASASSN-26em  2026-07-20.94 16.83
18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70  ASASSN-26eu  2026-07-20.93 14.86
03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40  AT2026ugi  2026-07-20.03 17.12
18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80  ASASSN-26eo  2026-07-19.36 16.16
04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80  ASASSN-26ej  2026-07-16.17 17.02
18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90  ASASSN-26ek  2026-07-16.24 15.73
17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50  ASASSN-26el  2026-07-15.86 16.01
14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30  ASASSN-26ei  2026-07-16.17 16.46
10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10  AT 2023mhb  2026-07-14.73 16.67
14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20  AT 2026unl  2026-07-15.27 17.11
10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80  ASASSN-26eh  2026-07-14.72 16.58
19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80  ASASSN-22le  2026-07-14.15 15.5
02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30  ASASSN-26ef  2026-07-12.35 15.86
23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70  SN 2026qtn  2026-07-12.22 16.47
02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40  ASASSN-26ec  2026-07-11.53 2.78
18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50  AT2026stb  2026-07-11.28 -1.29
13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00  AT2026pjf  2026-07-10.18 -0.72
17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70  SN2026pir  2026-07-9.86 -0.66
11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30  ASASSN-26ed  2026-07-8.8 -1.3
23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10  AT2026qil  2026-07-9.3 16.15
20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10  ASASSN-26ee  2026-07-7.22 15.53
19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80  AT2026ryu  2026-07-7.17 14.88
11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50  AT2026qqg  2026-07-5.01 16.82
19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30  AT2026qly  2026-07-5.02 17.31
17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10  ASASSN-26ea  2026-07-5.07 16.67
19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30  ASASSN-26eb  2026-07-4.97 15.52
18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20  SN 2026qqp  2026-07-5.03 -0.92
19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90  ASASSN-26dz  2026-07-5.14 15.91
19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90  AT 2026rdg  2026-07-3.43 11.81
04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40  AT 2026qpr  2026-06-30.4 15.96
13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80  SN 2026pub  2026-06-30.09 16.01
16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70  SN 2026pel  2026-06-26.38 16.07
10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30  ASASSN-26dy  2026-06-25.99 15.63
14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30  ASASSN-26dv  2026-06-23.03 14.62
13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70  ASASSN-26dw  2026-06-23.04 16.09
00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20  SN 2026mke  2026-06-22.39 17.13
11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50  SN 2026nmv  2026-06-22.06 16.56
21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50  AT2026oxh  2026-06-22.15 17.14
17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90  ASASSN-26dx  2026-06-22.02 14.72
14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10  AT2026pvk  2026-06-22.06 16.53
20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20  AT2026plb  2026-06-21.31 16.4
15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30  SN2026ore  2026-06-21.29 17.57
23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30  AT2026oxl  2026-06-21.52 17.64
17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20  AT2026ouj  2026-06-20.92 15.15
00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20  AT2026ntk  2026-06-18.09 17.34
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20  ASASSN-26du  2026-06-15.39 15.93
23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00  SN2026oxc  2026-06-14.35 16.83
02:02:26.67 +32:04:22.70  AT2026ovz  2026-06-14.6 15.52
21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50  AT2026nwc  2026-06-11 17.05
17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20  SN 2026odc  2026-06-11.23 17.62
13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20  SN 2026nyq  2026-06-11.1 16.24
00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90  ASASSN-26dt  2026-06-11.13 10.22
14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60  SN2026nyp  2026-06-10.3 16.32
12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50  SN2026mta  2026-06-8.29 16.69
12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20  SN2026oao  2026-06-9.32 17.02
10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60  AT2026nvf  2026-06-8.12 16.75
13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00  SN2026npn  2026-06-8.02 17.58
00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20  ASASSN-26dq  2026-06-7.43 13.58
01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70  SN 2026obc  2026-06-7.43 15.15
21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90  ASASSN-26dr  2026-06-7.24 16.24
06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00  ASASSN-26ds  2026-06-2.97 15.02
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40  SN2026mho  2026-05-25.18 -1.12
11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10  AT2026min  2026-05-24.21 16.63
11:44:33.11 -68:48:32.90  ASASSN-26no  2026-05-24.03 8.35
19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60  ASASSN-26dp  2026-05-22.31 -3.28
14:23:56.59 -58:37:47.40  ASASSN-26dn  2026-05-20.01 14.59
11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60  AT2026nma  2026-05-20.29 15.46
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10  AT2026lli  2026-05-19.34 15.86
00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70  AT2026nad  2026-05-19.39 15.34
15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40  ASASSN-26dm  2026-05-19.03 14.44
11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10  ASASSN-26dl  2026-05-18.02 13.55
13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00  ASASSN-26dk  2026-05-18.16 12.96
02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60  ASASSN-26dh  2026-05-18.43 15.37
17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90  ASASSN-26dj  2026-05-17.05 15.7
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10  ASASSN-26dg  2026-05-13.41 16.8
16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40  AT2026mhn  2026-05-12.33 15.8
09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00  ASASSN-26di  2026-05-12.14 14.63
21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00  AT2026kwu  2026-05-12.26 16.9
14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90  AT2026ktm  2026-05-12.06 17.21
14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40  AT2026lkm  2026-05-11.18 16.89
12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80  SN2026kep  2026-05-9.06 17.5
13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90  AT2026lkd  2026-05-9.09 17.23
09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60  SN2026kmo  2026-05-8.99 17.51
15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.40  AT2026lxf  2026-05-8.07 13.88
10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30  ASASSN-26df  2026-05-8.21 16.52
22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60  2026lda  2026-05-7.56 16.2
21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30  ASASSN-26de  2026-05-6.29 14.51
16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60  ASASSN-26dd  2026-05-5.15 15.93
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Aug 16 05:16 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2  PNV J00423868+4115582  2026-06-05.1224  19.97Umag
19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7  PNV J19004295-4831017  2026-05-25.0752  14.2mag
09:55:21.28 +69:02:52.6  PNV J09552128+6902526  2026-06-13.933  18.9mag
19:51:21.42 +37:06:40.0  TCP J19512142+3706400  2026-06-17.2942  16.8mag
19:57:03.87 +37:41:46.4  TCP J19570387+3741464  2026-06-18.2638  17.5mag
00:42:32.04 +41:10:28.3  PNV J00423204+4110283  2026-06-26.059  16.6mag
02:19:17.36 +28:57:15.8  TCP J02191736+2857158  2026-07-12.3549  12.5mag
00:44:56.43 +41:57:41.6  PNV J00445643+4157416  2026-07-13.8026  17.98Cmag
00:42:55.36 +41:17:27.0  PNV J00425536+4117270  2026-07-20.1813  17.7mag
20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9  TCP J20354364+6131329  2026-07-20.5443  14.4mag
21:17:31.48 +22:25:51.0  TCP J21173148+2225510  2026-07-23.5577  14.8mag
00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8  PNV J00412404+4049028  2026-07-25.0157  18.7mag
00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6  PNV J00430426+4102286  2026-07-26.1512  20mag
14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0  TCP J14515140+6613240  2026-07-29.2561  13.5mag
00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2  PNV J00430615+4122082  2026-07-30.0085  19.4mag
00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2  PNV J00413323+4110122  2026-08-02.8913  17.1mag
05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4  TCP J05210763+2338194  2026-08-06.4109  11.2mag
22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8  TCP J22571796+4707418  2026-08-09.3289  14.3mag
09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1  PSN J09133817+7628181  2026-08-09.8037  15.4mag
00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6  PNV J00431729+4126486  2026-08-14.0920  16.8mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 190K Aug 16 05:16 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
23:37:50.618 -01:46:17.45  AT 2026wuz  2026-07-25.58 20.15
00:30:26.145 +29:31:04.56  AT 2026wuy  2026-07-23.54 21.23
23:43:45.878 +27:53:57.40  AT 2026wux  2026-07-27.51 20.99
17:05:21.182 +29:02:19.42  AT 2026wuw  2026-03-09.61 21.2
16:00:25.159 +52:39:29.32  AT 2026wuv  2026-05-24.44 21
15:12:38.490 +17:08:40.32  AT 2026wuu  2026-07-06.38 20.78
20:34:48.010 -30:46:06.82  AT 2026wut  2026-07-08.49 20.87
13:24:16.058 -23:32:48.97  AT 2026wus  2026-05-21.31 20.5
15:52:09.810 +21:23:36.58  AT 2026wur  2026-05-19.33 21.14
17:21:27.821 +31:45:59.75  AT 2026wuq  2026-07-24.44 20.99
16:06:39.962 -00:03:48.96  AT 2026wup  2026-07-08.37 20.6
23:36:31.132 -01:42:30.56  AT 2026wuo  2026-07-25.58 21.53
14:58:54.953 +20:56:59.36  AT 2026wun  2026-06-12.38 21.33
13:29:54.424 -08:02:17.84  AT 2026wum  2026-05-12.34 21.76
15:31:56.171 -23:07:56.50  AT 2026wul  2026-07-16.29 21.12
15:50:35.869 +16:13:29.04  AT 2026wuk  2026-06-08.46 20.66
14:46:52.387 +23:41:33.95  AT 2026wuj  2026-07-19.29 20.84
02:33:14.312 +23:53:11.23  AT 2026wui  2026-07-25.60 21.47
23:59:19.033 +30:37:28.65  AT 2026wuh  2026-07-23.54 21.33
16:12:22.633 +29:40:38.32  AT 2026wug  2026-05-17.56 21.06
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 87K Aug 16 05:16 tns_transients_list.txt

=== Transient Factory Profiling ===
Started: Sun Aug 16 05:16:17 CDT 2026
=======================================
TIMING SExtractor: 2 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 0 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 0 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 0 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 3s (0.05 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 21s (0.35 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 0s (0.00 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 6s (0.10 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 0s (0.00 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 0s (0.00 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 2s (0.03 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 1s (0.02 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 33s (0.55 min)
TIMING SExtractor: 6 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 1 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 0 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 1 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 11s (0.18 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 0s (0.00 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 1s (0.02 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 7s (0.12 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 1s (0.02 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 1s (0.02 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 1s (0.02 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 2s (0.03 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 0s (0.00 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 10s (0.17 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 32s (0.53 min)
FIELD_Tau-07-Q1b1x1: 78s (1.30 min)
=======================================
TOTAL_RUNTIME: 82s (1.37 min)
Finished: Sun Aug 16 05:17:39 CDT 2026