This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045443_TTUQ2b1x1_1217466_iTyMdRj9
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 16.3784 2461268.8784 11.70 06:04:18.53 +31:50:12.5
179.52251 4.94177 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 7.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.115 Thyra 1 -0 1 12.2 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:04:18.53 +31:50:12.5: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:04:18.53 +31:50:12.5: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461268.8784,11.70,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260816.3784 11.70CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 16.3784 2461268.8784 10.45 06:08:44.95 +25:51:19.5
185.24049 2.89681 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 7.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" V0379 Gem
Type: SRB
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.300 V 12.400 V 2452810.70000 149.000000000000 M5III
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:08:44.95 +25:51:19.5: 11.37 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:08:44.95 +25:51:19.5: 11.37 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.37 +/- 0.00
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V0379 Gem,2461268.8784,10.45,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V0379 Gem 20260816.3784 10.45CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.61992316 22.02.2026 02:52:31.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
First image: 2461093.61992316 22.02.2026 02:52:31.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Last image: 2461268.87872285 16.08.2026 09:05:11.654 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045443_TTUQ2b1x1_1217466_iTyMdRj9/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 5
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.70
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 21499
Objects passed selection criteria: 21342
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.4 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.4 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 13822
Average stars matched: 12901.2 (93.3385 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 246568 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Aug 16 04:57:00 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.61992316 22.02.2026 02:52:31.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
First image: 2461093.61992316 22.02.2026 02:52:31.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Last image: 2461268.87872285 16.08.2026 09:05:11.654 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045443_TTUQ2b1x1_1217466_iTyMdRj9/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 113
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.32
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 33 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 174107
Objects passed selection criteria: 173578
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 117149
Average stars matched: 108926 (92.9805 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 635644 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Aug 16 04:58:12 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045443_TTUQ2b1x1_1217466_iTyMdRj9/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-04-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045443_TTUQ2b1x1_1217466_iTyMdRj9/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045443_TTUQ2b1x1_1217466_iTyMdRj9/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-04-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045443_TTUQ2b1x1_1217466_iTyMdRj9/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461268.87812256
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-04-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:00.478 +29:59:52.02 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-04-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-04-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits
Image size: 940.9'x624.4' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:59:59.959 +29:59:25.36 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:00:00.478 +29:59:52.02
Second-epoch image center 05:59:59.959 +29:59:25.36
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0076 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits
Image size: 940.8'x624.4' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:59:58.494 +30:00:06.04 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:00:00.478 +29:59:52.02
Second-epoch image center 05:59:58.494 +30:00:06.04
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0081 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:59:59.959 +29:59:25.36
Second-epoch second image center 05:59:58.494 +30:00:06.04
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01247 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WaXjeJvo6l
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits &> /tmp/tmp.snFBokHAQJ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045443_TTUQ2b1x1_1217466_iTyMdRj9/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-04-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2PlOwu56Qc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045443_TTUQ2b1x1_1217466_iTyMdRj9/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-04-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045443_TTUQ2b1x1_1217466_iTyMdRj9/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5x3vPoP31e
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045443_TTUQ2b1x1_1217466_iTyMdRj9/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 27193 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5790 to 99.6671 deg, Dec +24.3414 to +35.3066 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5790 to 99.6671 deg, Dec 24.3414 to 35.3066 deg
Loaded 17097 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 12045 out of 13628 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 13628 out of 27193 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.939700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.939700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.70
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.24
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.24
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 27193 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5790 to 99.6671 deg, Dec +24.3414 to +35.3066 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5790 to 99.6671 deg, Dec 24.3414 to 35.3066 deg
Loaded 17097 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 12045 out of 13628 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 13628 out of 27193 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 27141 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5933 to 99.6669 deg, Dec +24.3420 to +35.3116 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5933 to 99.6669 deg, Dec 24.3420 to 35.3116 deg
Loaded 17089 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 12096 out of 13641 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 13641 out of 27141 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
2.1 pix Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
2.3 pix fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-04-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits
2.3 pix fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
15.2 mag. Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
13.4 mag. fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-04-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits
13.5 mag. fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.4 (SNR ) 10.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.WaXjeJvo6l (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045443_TTUQ2b1x1_1217466_iTyMdRj9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3136, bad_region=5792, passed=27193
Got 27193 stars (including 18877 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27193 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4837 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4778 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4778 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4778 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22652 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4837 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4778 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22652 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4778 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22652 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4778 stars left (next iteration limit 5255)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits N_match=4778 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.476 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.618 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.478 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.433 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.402 n_q1=1282 n_q2=975 n_q3=1593 n_q4=928 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.299
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits -region wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.snFBokHAQJ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045443_TTUQ2b1x1_1217466_iTyMdRj9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3121, bad_region=5776, passed=27141
Got 27141 stars (including 18855 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27141 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4837 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4780 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4780 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4780 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22616 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4837 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4780 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22616 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4780 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22617 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4780 stars left (next iteration limit 5258)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits N_match=4780 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.473 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.602 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.470 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.444 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.384 n_q1=1281 n_q2=975 n_q3=1595 n_q4=929 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.273
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -region wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.2PlOwu56Qc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045443_TTUQ2b1x1_1217466_iTyMdRj9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045443_TTUQ2b1x1_1217466_iTyMdRj9/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-04-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045443_TTUQ2b1x1_1217466_iTyMdRj9/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-04-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045443_TTUQ2b1x1_1217466_iTyMdRj9/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-04-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045443_TTUQ2b1x1_1217466_iTyMdRj9/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-04-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045443_TTUQ2b1x1_1217466_iTyMdRj9/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-04-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045443_TTUQ2b1x1_1217466_iTyMdRj9/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-04-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-04-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-04-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-04-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-04-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-04-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-04-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-04-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045443_TTUQ2b1x1_1217466_iTyMdRj9/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-04-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-04-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=366, bad_region=902, passed=7272
Got 7272 stars (including 6020 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-04-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7272 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4851 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4777 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4778 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4777 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6585 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4854 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4779 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6585 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4779 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6585 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Excluding outliers - 4779 stars left (next iteration limit 5254)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4779 robust_rms=5.677 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=9.400 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4779 robust_rms=0.688 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.794 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4779 robust_rms=0.618 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.650 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4779 robust_rms_before=1.498 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.632 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.618 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.681 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.650
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.681 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-04-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits N_match=4779 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.640 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.687 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.644 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.655 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.590 n_q1=1303 n_q2=670 n_q3=2078 n_q4=728 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.074
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-04-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-04-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045443_TTUQ2b1x1_1217466_iTyMdRj9/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-04-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-04-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-04-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.5x3vPoP31e (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045443_TTUQ2b1x1_1217466_iTyMdRj9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045443_TTUQ2b1x1_1217466_iTyMdRj9/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045443_TTUQ2b1x1_1217466_iTyMdRj9/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045443_TTUQ2b1x1_1217466_iTyMdRj9/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045443_TTUQ2b1x1_1217466_iTyMdRj9/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045443_TTUQ2b1x1_1217466_iTyMdRj9/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045443_TTUQ2b1x1_1217466_iTyMdRj9/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045443_TTUQ2b1x1_1217466_iTyMdRj9/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=381, bad_region=927, passed=7372
Got 7372 stars (including 6081 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7372 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013067 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010453 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4842 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4770 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4771 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4770 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6654 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4842 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4772 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6654 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4772 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6654 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Excluding outliers - 4772 stars left (next iteration limit 5247)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4772 robust_rms=5.694 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=9.436 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4772 robust_rms=0.615 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.641 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4772 robust_rms=0.581 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.605 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4772 robust_rms_before=1.463 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.620 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.581 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.691 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.605
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits
Image size: 941.0'x624.4' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:59:58.593 +30:00:04.75 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 7372 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045443_TTUQ2b1x1_1217466_iTyMdRj9/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1254735.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 1.463 -> 0.581 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits N_match=4772 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.609 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.609 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.653 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.619 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.630 n_q1=1347 n_q2=625 n_q3=2075 n_q4=725 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.072
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045443_TTUQ2b1x1_1217466_iTyMdRj9/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-04-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-04-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-04-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits sigma_overall=0.476 worst_q_ratio=1.299
ref2=Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits sigma_overall=0.473 worst_q_ratio=1.273
new1=fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-04-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits sigma_overall=0.640 worst_q_ratio=1.074
new2=fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits sigma_overall=0.609 worst_q_ratio=1.072
reference average sigma_overall=0.4745 worst_q_ratio=1.286
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_astrometric_residuals.png (4778 matched stars from wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.45 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_astrometric_residuals.png (4780 matched stars from wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.44 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-04-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0438_astrometric_residuals.png (4779 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-04-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.60 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439_astrometric_residuals.png (4772 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.49 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-04-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-04-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045443_TTUQ2b1x1_1217466_iTyMdRj9/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-04-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045443_TTUQ2b1x1_1217466_iTyMdRj9/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31544_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 31544_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:21.52 +29:29:38.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33154_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 33154_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:12.26 +32:03:14.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17096_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 17096_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:17.00 +28:29:02.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14094_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 14094_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:15:22.15 +29:29:45.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Aur-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045443_TTUQ2b1x1_1217466_iTyMdRj9/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-04-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045443_TTUQ2b1x1_1217466_iTyMdRj9/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045443_TTUQ2b1x1_1217466_iTyMdRj9/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-04-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045443_TTUQ2b1x1_1217466_iTyMdRj9/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-04-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-04-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:00.478 +29:59:52.02 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-04-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-04-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits
Image size: 940.9'x624.4' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:59:59.959 +29:59:25.36 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:00:00.478 +29:59:52.02
Second-epoch image center 05:59:59.959 +29:59:25.36
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0076 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits
Image size: 941.0'x624.4' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:59:58.593 +30:00:04.75 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:00:00.478 +29:59:52.02
Second-epoch image center 05:59:58.593 +30:00:04.75
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0077 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:59:59.959 +29:59:25.36
Second-epoch second image center 05:59:58.593 +30:00:04.75
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01200 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits &> /tmp/tmp.yQx9hon8rc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RXEKRHwQKd
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045443_TTUQ2b1x1_1217466_iTyMdRj9/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-04-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits &> /tmp/tmp.w6jSCZ9WcT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045443_TTUQ2b1x1_1217466_iTyMdRj9/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-04-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045443_TTUQ2b1x1_1217466_iTyMdRj9/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Bg9DCjiUAj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045443_TTUQ2b1x1_1217466_iTyMdRj9/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 212828 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5594 to 99.6902 deg, Dec +24.3171 to +35.3065 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5594 to 99.6902 deg, Dec 24.3171 to 35.3065 deg
Loaded 17190 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9236 out of 14303 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14303 out of 212828 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.778800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.778800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.32
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.46
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.46
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 212828 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5594 to 99.6902 deg, Dec +24.3171 to +35.3065 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5594 to 99.6902 deg, Dec 24.3171 to 35.3065 deg
Loaded 17190 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9236 out of 14303 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14303 out of 212828 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (aperture=4.4)
Read 212641 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5682 to 99.6901 deg, Dec +24.3244 to +35.3140 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5682 to 99.6901 deg, Dec 24.3244 to 35.3140 deg
Loaded 17179 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9281 out of 14295 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14295 out of 212641 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (aperture=4.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 84 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
1.9 pix Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
2.2 pix fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-04-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits
2.2 pix fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
15.5 mag. Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
13.7 mag. fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-04-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits
13.7 mag. fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.7 (SNR ) 13.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.yQx9hon8rc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045443_TTUQ2b1x1_1217466_iTyMdRj9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=1, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=61, blended=32425, bad_region=34270, passed=212766
Got 212766 stars (including 150203 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 212766 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4810 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4761 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4762 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4761 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 186146 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4810 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4761 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 186146 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4761 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 186146 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 4761 stars left (next iteration limit 5237)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits N_match=4761 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.456 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.570 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.444 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.397 n_q1=1332 n_q2=876 n_q3=1615 n_q4=938 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.250
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits -region wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.RXEKRHwQKd (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045443_TTUQ2b1x1_1217466_iTyMdRj9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=36, blended=32176, bad_region=34340, passed=212605
Got 212605 stars (including 150130 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 212605 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4807 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4763 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4763 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4763 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 185900 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4807 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4763 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 185900 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4763 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 185900 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 4763 stars left (next iteration limit 5239)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits N_match=4763 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.453 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.565 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.440 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.413 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.381 n_q1=1324 n_q2=908 n_q3=1589 n_q4=942 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.247
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -region wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.w6jSCZ9WcT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045443_TTUQ2b1x1_1217466_iTyMdRj9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045443_TTUQ2b1x1_1217466_iTyMdRj9/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-04-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045443_TTUQ2b1x1_1217466_iTyMdRj9/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-04-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045443_TTUQ2b1x1_1217466_iTyMdRj9/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-04-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045443_TTUQ2b1x1_1217466_iTyMdRj9/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-04-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045443_TTUQ2b1x1_1217466_iTyMdRj9/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-04-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045443_TTUQ2b1x1_1217466_iTyMdRj9/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-04-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-04-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-04-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-04-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-04-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-04-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-04-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-04-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045443_TTUQ2b1x1_1217466_iTyMdRj9/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-04-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-04-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=3186, bad_region=5657, passed=61750
Got 61750 stars (including 53030 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-04-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 61750 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4839 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4775 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4775 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4775 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 57588 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4839 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4777 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 57588 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4777 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 57588 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Excluding outliers - 4777 stars left (next iteration limit 5252)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-04-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4777 robust_rms=5.653 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=8.931 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4777 robust_rms=0.680 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.793 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4777 robust_rms=0.618 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.646 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4777 robust_rms_before=1.506 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.632 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.618 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.683 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.646
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.683 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-04-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits N_match=4777 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.636 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.659 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.649 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.638 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.640 n_q1=1348 n_q2=664 n_q3=2037 n_q4=728 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.037
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-04-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-04-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045443_TTUQ2b1x1_1217466_iTyMdRj9/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-04-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-04-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-04-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Bg9DCjiUAj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045443_TTUQ2b1x1_1217466_iTyMdRj9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045443_TTUQ2b1x1_1217466_iTyMdRj9/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045443_TTUQ2b1x1_1217466_iTyMdRj9/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045443_TTUQ2b1x1_1217466_iTyMdRj9/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045443_TTUQ2b1x1_1217466_iTyMdRj9/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045443_TTUQ2b1x1_1217466_iTyMdRj9/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045443_TTUQ2b1x1_1217466_iTyMdRj9/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045443_TTUQ2b1x1_1217466_iTyMdRj9/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=3368, bad_region=5832, passed=63862
Got 63862 stars (including 54803 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 63862 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4831 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4768 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4768 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4768 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 59619 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4831 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4767 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 59619 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4767 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 59618 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Excluding outliers - 4767 stars left (next iteration limit 5244)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4767 robust_rms=5.753 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=9.351 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4767 robust_rms=0.611 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.634 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4767 robust_rms=0.576 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.597 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4767 robust_rms_before=0.582 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.616 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.576 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.598 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.597
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.598 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits N_match=4767 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.627 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.641 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.688 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.659 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.591 n_q1=1377 n_q2=620 n_q3=2032 n_q4=738 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.096
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045443_TTUQ2b1x1_1217466_iTyMdRj9/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-04-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045443_TTUQ2b1x1_1217466_iTyMdRj9/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-04-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0438.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_045443_TTUQ2b1x1_1217466_iTyMdRj9/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:54:34.22 +31:12:41.2: 13.05 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:51:55.83 +30:27:07.2: 13.12 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:04:18.53 +31:50:12.5: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:54:34.22 +31:12:41.2: 13.07 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:51:55.83 +30:27:07.2: 13.17 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.06 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.15 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:54:34.22 +31:12:41.2: ref_mag=13.06 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8117 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:51:55.83 +30:27:07.2: ref_mag=13.15 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1851 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:04:18.53 +31:50:12.5: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:08:44.95 +25:51:19.5: 11.37 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:08:44.95 +25:51:19.5: 11.37 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.37 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:08:44.95 +25:51:19.5: ref_mag=11.37 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.4440 delta=0.93 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:51:40.69 +32:22:11.9: 11.17 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:51:40.69 +32:22:11.9: 11.15 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.16 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:51:40.69 +32:22:11.9: ref_mag=11.16 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.1024 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out173004.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out242356.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239240_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 239240_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:02:27.58 +32:47:18.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239242_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 239242_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:09.10 +29:23:37.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239245_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 239245_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239253_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 239253_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239263_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 239263_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:19.64 +33:23:59.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239266_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 239266_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:21.68 +33:50:30.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239271_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 239271_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:56:13.97 +29:52:33.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239272_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 239272_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:20.60 +32:13:21.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239273_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 239273_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:28.94 +27:18:46.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239274_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 239274_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:11.86 +26:16:28.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239279_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 239279_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:14.61 +32:34:52.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239280_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 239280_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:20.36 +32:33:48.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239281_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 239281_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:18.07 +32:31:16.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239282_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 239282_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:07.77 +32:34:18.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239283_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 239283_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:21.52 +29:29:38.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 240999_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 240999_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:12.25 +32:03:15.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242209_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 242209_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:16.35 +32:35:32.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242356_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439
Preparing report for the candidate 242356_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242581_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 242581_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:27.61 +28:29:43.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242667_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 242667_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:00.46 +27:56:29.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242999_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 242999_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:52.60 +27:35:10.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243167_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 243167_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:33.51 +28:34:30.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243642_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 243642_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:11.65 +32:30:20.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244199_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 244199_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:01.97 +25:55:16.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244543_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 244543_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:19.38 +31:39:31.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244656_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 244656_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:23.39 +28:38:32.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244727_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 244727_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:05.48 +32:31:00.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245048_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 245048_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:12:10.69 +32:41:27.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245461_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 245461_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:20.88 +30:53:55.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245526_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 245526_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:40:54.95 +32:52:28.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245730_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 245730_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:15.55 +31:22:54.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 246407_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 246407_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:52.04 +29:59:32.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 246480_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 246480_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:07:02.59 +26:39:17.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 246834_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 246834_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:40:45.35 +27:47:11.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 246887_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 246887_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:14.14 +33:06:40.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 246923_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 246923_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:07.54 +31:03:51.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247020_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 247020_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:15.17 +32:06:48.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247418_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 247418_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:14:01.50 +33:16:06.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247695_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 247695_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:24.68 +28:37:26.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247985_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 247985_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:34.79 +30:30:36.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248067_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 248067_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:06:57.09 +26:41:00.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248281_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 248281_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:56:30.09 +32:40:49.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248284_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 248284_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:32.56 +30:42:56.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248663_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 248663_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:10.05 +33:01:09.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248728_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 248728_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:43.60 +32:59:10.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248821_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 248821_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:56:46.68 +32:30:24.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248978_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 248978_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:07:04.03 +33:02:03.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249131_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 249131_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:33.88 +29:00:27.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249176_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 249176_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:02:49.07 +32:38:49.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249186_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 249186_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:10.43 +29:22:43.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249663_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 249663_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:15:12.04 +29:29:00.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249691_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 249691_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:50.90 +30:45:42.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249694_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 249694_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:14.80 +31:57:29.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249803_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 249803_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:50:24.73 +31:04:20.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249892_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 249892_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:49.98 +31:50:08.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 250598_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 250598_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:13.59 +32:04:17.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 251787_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 251787_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:59:40.33 +32:48:58.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 252210_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 252210_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:37.95 +31:04:08.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 252214_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 252214_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:56:06.15 +32:08:03.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 252240_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 252240_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:59:38.22 +32:48:43.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 253190_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 253190_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:19.16 +30:04:09.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167626_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 167626_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:57:59.62 +25:57:16.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116475_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 116475_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:15:22.17 +29:29:45.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159674_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 159674_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:19.72 +27:36:46.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173004_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439
Preparing report for the candidate 173004_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 136018_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 136018_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:21.10 +28:36:31.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 124884_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 124884_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:17:05.45 +28:56:02.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158400_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 158400_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:15:28.24 +27:23:46.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59148_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 59148_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:07:00.31 +32:13:09.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88249_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 88249_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:56:48.46 +30:50:08.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113818_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 113818_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:15:37.13 +29:27:29.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156560_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 156560_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:40:49.23 +27:36:16.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58867_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 58867_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:35.28 +32:16:30.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 226285_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 226285_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24946_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 24946_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:43:36.99 +33:54:13.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115105_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 115105_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:47.53 +29:32:52.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62401_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 62401_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:08:39.93 +32:01:54.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79766_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 79766_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:20:38.22 +31:03:04.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137469_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 137469_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:16.93 +28:29:02.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75870_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 75870_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:10:30.78 +31:25:48.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63229_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 63229_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:03.43 +32:03:15.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114879_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 114879_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:16:49.51 +29:22:38.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159325_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 159325_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:00.43 +27:34:22.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50616_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439
The candidate 50616_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_04-05-11_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0439 did not pass the final checks