######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC=
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK=
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN=
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP=
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION=
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER=
HOME=
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory:
UMa-02-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting UMa-02-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing UMa-02-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 872877 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 872877 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-19-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-19-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits_preview.png'
UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-19-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits

renamed 'UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-20-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-20-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits_preview.png'
UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-20-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits

Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 521.0909
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 558.9001
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1655.0842
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 411.7946
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1651.2621
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 409.7077
----------------------------------------------
INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 3.17619
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.005
INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 24.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_042047_TTUQ1b1x1_2380232_sgBblEdj/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-19-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_042047_TTUQ1b1x1_2380232_sgBblEdj/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-19-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_042047_TTUQ1b1x1_2380232_sgBblEdj/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-19-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-16T04:19:12.1196220' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-16T09:19:12.1196220' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61268.3883347106 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-16T09:19:22.0241798' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61268.3884493518 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 128.567466873931 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 61.9998066543867 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 14.9330555555556 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 23.0922222222222 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 3.82672943803239 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-02' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '08 34 17' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+62 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29508 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29508 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 15.0 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 56.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 905.59 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 24.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 43.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 13.00104 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 5.800464 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_042047_TTUQ1b1x1_2380232_sgBblEdj/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-19-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_042047_TTUQ1b1x1_2380232_sgBblEdj/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-19-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_042047_TTUQ1b1x1_2380232_sgBblEdj/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-19-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_042047_TTUQ1b1x1_2380232_sgBblEdj/d_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-19-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits :)
Spent 0.654424 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_042047_TTUQ1b1x1_2380232_sgBblEdj/d_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-19-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_042047_TTUQ1b1x1_2380232_sgBblEdj/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-19-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_042047_TTUQ1b1x1_2380232_sgBblEdj/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-19-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 24.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_042047_TTUQ1b1x1_2380232_sgBblEdj/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-20-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_042047_TTUQ1b1x1_2380232_sgBblEdj/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-20-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_042047_TTUQ1b1x1_2380232_sgBblEdj/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-20-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-16T04:20:03.9133731' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-16T09:20:03.9133731' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61268.3889341783 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-16T09:20:13.8072456' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61268.3890486923 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 128.567466833874 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 61.9998066977046 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 15.0036111111111 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 23.1677777777778 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 3.80966974993598 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-02' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '08 34 17' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+62 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29508 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29508 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 15.0 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 56.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 905.59 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 24.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 43.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 13.00104 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 5.800464 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_042047_TTUQ1b1x1_2380232_sgBblEdj/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-20-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_042047_TTUQ1b1x1_2380232_sgBblEdj/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-20-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_042047_TTUQ1b1x1_2380232_sgBblEdj/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-20-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_042047_TTUQ1b1x1_2380232_sgBblEdj/d_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-20-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits :)
Spent 0.581149 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_042047_TTUQ1b1x1_2380232_sgBblEdj/d_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-20-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_042047_TTUQ1b1x1_2380232_sgBblEdj/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-20-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_042047_TTUQ1b1x1_2380232_sgBblEdj/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-20-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_042047_TTUQ1b1x1_2380232_sgBblEdj/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-19-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_042047_TTUQ1b1x1_2380232_sgBblEdj/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-20-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-19-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits

fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-20-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits

Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_042047_TTUQ1b1x1_2380232_sgBblEdj/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-19-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_042047_TTUQ1b1x1_2380232_sgBblEdj/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-20-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_042047_TTUQ1b1x1_2380232_sgBblEdj/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-19-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_042047_TTUQ1b1x1_2380232_sgBblEdj/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-20-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461268.88845045
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-19-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-20-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:34:18.663 +61:59:38.81 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-19-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-19-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
Image size: 943.8'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:34:18.480 +62:00:10.06 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 08:34:18.663 +61:59:38.81
Second-epoch image center 08:34:18.480 +62:00:10.06
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0087 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-20-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-20-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
Image size: 943.8'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:34:19.500 +62:00:45.12 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 08:34:18.663 +61:59:38.81
Second-epoch image center 08:34:19.500 +62:00:45.12
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0185 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 08:34:18.480 +62:00:10.06
Second-epoch second image center 08:34:19.500 +62:00:45.12
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00994 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2v8ctnmsQ5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0qtU20CDAi
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_042047_TTUQ1b1x1_2380232_sgBblEdj/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-19-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits &> /tmp/tmp.AIfXIm7H2T
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_042047_TTUQ1b1x1_2380232_sgBblEdj/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-19-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_042047_TTUQ1b1x1_2380232_sgBblEdj/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-20-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bEyDPcPW8c
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_042047_TTUQ1b1x1_2380232_sgBblEdj/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-20-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits and wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits and wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits and wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 9619 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 109.7385 to 148.5418 deg, Dec +55.4555 to +67.4100 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 109.7385 to 148.5418 deg, Dec 55.4555 to 67.4100 deg
Loaded 8849 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5401 out of 5701 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5701 out of 9619 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.868000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.868000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.53
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.34
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.34
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 9619 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 109.7385 to 148.5418 deg, Dec +55.4555 to +67.4100 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 109.7385 to 148.5418 deg, Dec 55.4555 to 67.4100 deg
Loaded 8849 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5401 out of 5701 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5701 out of 9619 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 9596 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 109.7385 to 148.5413 deg, Dec +55.4555 to +67.4099 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 109.7385 to 148.5413 deg, Dec 55.4555 to 67.4099 deg
Loaded 8848 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5383 out of 5695 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5695 out of 9596 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
2.2 pix UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
2.7 pix fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-19-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
2.7 pix fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-20-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
15.3 mag. UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
13.6 mag. fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-19-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
13.6 mag. fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-20-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.6 (SNR ) 10.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.2v8ctnmsQ5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_042047_TTUQ1b1x1_2380232_sgBblEdj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=686, bad_region=0, passed=9619
Got 9619 stars (including 8917 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9619 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 789 (Dec 55.5 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4904 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4898 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9619 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 789 (Dec 55.5 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4904 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9619 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9619 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4896 stars left (next iteration limit 5385)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits N_match=4896 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.507 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.291 n_q1=1045 n_q2=1423 n_q3=1046 n_q4=1382 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.433
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits -region wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.0qtU20CDAi (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_042047_TTUQ1b1x1_2380232_sgBblEdj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=696, bad_region=0, passed=9596
Got 9596 stars (including 8884 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9596 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 789 (Dec 55.5 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4907 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4902 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9596 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 789 (Dec 55.5 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4907 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9596 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9596 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4901 stars left (next iteration limit 5391)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits N_match=4901 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.506 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.299 n_q1=1037 n_q2=1434 n_q3=1042 n_q4=1388 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.387
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits -region wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.AIfXIm7H2T (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_042047_TTUQ1b1x1_2380232_sgBblEdj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_042047_TTUQ1b1x1_2380232_sgBblEdj/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-19-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_042047_TTUQ1b1x1_2380232_sgBblEdj/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-19-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_042047_TTUQ1b1x1_2380232_sgBblEdj/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-19-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_042047_TTUQ1b1x1_2380232_sgBblEdj/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-19-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_042047_TTUQ1b1x1_2380232_sgBblEdj/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-19-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_042047_TTUQ1b1x1_2380232_sgBblEdj/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-19-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-19-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-19-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-19-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-19-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-19-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-19-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-19-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_042047_TTUQ1b1x1_2380232_sgBblEdj/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-19-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-19-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=93, bad_region=0, passed=2130
Got 2130 stars (including 2036 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-19-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2130 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 943.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 943.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013108 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010487 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 731 to 788 (Dec 56.4 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 1984 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1981 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1954 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1981 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2100 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 731 to 788 (Dec 56.4 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 1983 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1982 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2102 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1982 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2102 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 1982 stars left (next iteration limit 2179)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: the 1982 catalog matches do not cover the frame (754/83/894/251 per quadrant, need 123 in each) - keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-19-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits N_match=1982 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.406 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.442 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.648 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.475 n_q1=754 n_q2=83 n_q3=894 n_q4=251 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.595
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-19-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-19-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_042047_TTUQ1b1x1_2380232_sgBblEdj/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-19-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-19-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-19-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.bEyDPcPW8c (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_042047_TTUQ1b1x1_2380232_sgBblEdj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_042047_TTUQ1b1x1_2380232_sgBblEdj/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-20-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_042047_TTUQ1b1x1_2380232_sgBblEdj/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-20-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_042047_TTUQ1b1x1_2380232_sgBblEdj/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-20-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_042047_TTUQ1b1x1_2380232_sgBblEdj/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-20-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_042047_TTUQ1b1x1_2380232_sgBblEdj/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-20-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_042047_TTUQ1b1x1_2380232_sgBblEdj/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-20-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-20-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-20-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-20-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-20-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-20-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-20-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-20-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_042047_TTUQ1b1x1_2380232_sgBblEdj/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-20-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-20-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=90, bad_region=0, passed=2169
Got 2169 stars (including 2076 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-20-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2169 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 943.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 943.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013108 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010487 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 731 to 788 (Dec 56.4 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2025 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2022 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1991 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2022 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2135 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 731 to 788 (Dec 56.4 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2023 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2021 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2135 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2021 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2135 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 2021 stars left (next iteration limit 2224)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: the 2021 catalog matches do not cover the frame (758/89/913/261 per quadrant, need 126 in each) - keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-20-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits N_match=2021 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.407 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.471 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.801 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.431 n_q1=758 n_q2=89 n_q3=913 n_q4=261 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.970
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-20-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-20-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_042047_TTUQ1b1x1_2380232_sgBblEdj/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-20-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-20-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-20-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-19-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-19-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-19-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-20-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-20-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-20-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits sigma_overall=0.353 worst_q_ratio=1.433
ref2=UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits sigma_overall=0.365 worst_q_ratio=1.387
new1=fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-19-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits sigma_overall=0.406 worst_q_ratio=1.595
new2=fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-20-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits sigma_overall=0.407 worst_q_ratio=1.970
reference average sigma_overall=0.359 worst_q_ratio=1.41
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302_astrometric_residuals.png (4896 matched stars from wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303_astrometric_residuals.png (4901 matched stars from wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-19-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075_astrometric_residuals.png (1982 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-19-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.36 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-20-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076_astrometric_residuals.png (2021 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-20-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)

Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-19-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-19-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_042047_TTUQ1b1x1_2380232_sgBblEdj/wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-19-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-20-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-20-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_042047_TTUQ1b1x1_2380232_sgBblEdj/wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-20-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20561_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-20-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 20561_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-20-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 16.38905 | 2461268.88905 | 10.77 | 07:54:26.81 +65:18:53.4 | 2174 5245 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_042047_TTUQ1b1x1_2380232_sgBblEdj/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-20-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits |
**** FOUND 07:54:26.91 +65:18:53.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09362_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-20-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076
The candidate 09362_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-20-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 08 16.38905 | 2461268.88905 | 9.59 | 07:55:51.04 +57:11:54.9 | 1786 0345 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_042047_TTUQ1b1x1_2380232_sgBblEdj/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-20-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits |
**** FOUND 07:55:51.03 +57:11:54.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_042047_TTUQ1b1x1_2380232_sgBblEdj/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-19-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_042047_TTUQ1b1x1_2380232_sgBblEdj/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-20-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
Last image: 2461268.88845045 16.08.2026 09:19:12.119 UTC
WARNING: VaST exited with code 1 on the field UMa-02-Q1b1x1 AFTER completing the measurements. This is a memory-management crash during cleanup (a VaST bug to report), NOT a wrong field / clouds / bad focus. The lightcurves were written, so the transient search continues.
____ VaST output (crashed during memory cleanup; the measurements above are complete) ____
--==VaST 1.0rc90==--
Parsing command line arguments...
opt 'F': Will NOT create flag images for SExtractor
opt '5': 5.000000 pix is the new fixed star matching radius!
opt 'b': Using 500 reference stars for image matching!
opt '3': Will try to select best aperture for each source!
opt 'y': 0 SysRem iterations will be conducted!
opt 't 4': robust linear magnitude calibration (vary zero-point and slope)
opt 'x': 99 is the maximum acceptable SExtractor flag!
WARNING: disabling the mag-size filter in order not to reject blended stars.
opt 'u': Stick with UTC time system, no conversion to TT will be done!
opt 'f': Run ./find_candidates manually!
opt 'k': "JD" keyword in FITS image header will be ignored!
INFO from vast_remove_directory(): Could not open directory: symlinks_to_images
INFO from vast_remove_directory(): Could not open directory: converted_images
INFO from vast_remove_directory(): Could not open directory: unpacked_images
Checking the list of input images specified on the command line ...
Looking for the list of input images with time corrections in vast_list_of_input_images_with_time_corrections.txt ... list not found.
This is OK if you specify the input images on the command line, not through this text file.
Checking write permissions for the current directory (/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_042047_TTUQ1b1x1_2380232_sgBblEdj)... OK
Found a system-wide installation of SExtractor
Cleaning old outNNNNN.dat files.
Done with cleaning!
VaST was started with the following command line:
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_042047_TTUQ1b1x1_2380232_sgBblEdj/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-19-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_042047_TTUQ1b1x1_2380232_sgBblEdj/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-20-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
Preparing to process 4 input FITS images...
######## Forcing special settings for the transient detection ########
transient search mode: disabling the mag-size filter as it should be switched off when running a transient search!
transient search mode: disabling the bad image filter as it will not help during the transient search!
transient search mode: will not try to gues image saturation limit
transient search mode: no UTC-to-TT time system conversion will be performed!!!
transient search mode: setting the maximum acceptable SExtractor flag to 3
transient search mode: disabling rejectin of images with elliptical stars
transient search mode: not discarding large sources
################
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
Setting the fixed star match radius of 5.00 pix
We have 4 images to process.
SExtractor catalog cache: restored UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits catalog from cache
SExtractor catalog cache: restored UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits catalog from cache
Running SExtractor in 3 parallel threads...
Using the catalog image00001.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
Using the catalog image00002.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
The gain value (GAIN=0.830) from default.sex will be used for image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_042047_TTUQ1b1x1_2380232_sgBblEdj/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-19-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
The above guess is based on the non-default gain value specified in default.sex by user
Parent process says: we are done fork()ing.
Waiting for thread 2 to finish...
autodetect_aperture() is running SExtractor on /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_042047_TTUQ1b1x1_2380232_sgBblEdj/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-19-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
autodetect_aperture() is doing a preliminary SExtractor run to determine an appropriate aperture size
The gain value (GAIN=0.830) from default.sex will be used for image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-02-Q1sex -c default.sex -PARAMETERS_NAME autodetect_aper.param -CATALOG_NAME autodetect_aper_image00003.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_042047_TTUQ1b1x1_2380232_sgBblEdj/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-19-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits > image00003.cat.sex_log 2>&1b1x1_042047_TTUQ1b1x1_2380232_sgBblEdj/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-20-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
The above guess is
based on the non-default gain value specified in default.sex by user
autodetect_aperture() is running SExtractor on /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_042047_TTUQ1b1x1_2380232_sgBblEdj/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-20-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
autodetect_aperture() is doing a preliminary SExtractor run to determine an appropriate aperture size
sex -c default.sex -PARAMETERS_NAME autodetect_aper.param -CATALOG_NAME autodetect_aper_image00004.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_042047_TTUQ1b1x1_2380232_sgBblEdj/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-20-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits > image00004.cat.sex_log 2>&1
autodetect_aperture() is doing the main SExtractor run
sex -PARAMETERS_NAME default.param -PHOT_APERTURES 5.4,5.4,4.9,6.0,6.5,7.0 -VERBOSE_TYPE NORMAL -CATALOG_NAME image00004.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_042047_TTUQ1b1x1_2380232_sgBblEdj/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-20-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits > image00004.cat.sex_log 2>&1
autodetect_aperture() is doing the main SExtractor run
sex -PARAMETERS_NAME default.param -PHOT_APERTURES 5.4,5.4,4.9,5.9,6.5,7.0 -VERBOSE_TYPE NORMAL -CATALOG_NAME image00003.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_042047_TTUQ1b1x1_2380232_sgBblEdj/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-19-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits > image00003.cat.sex_log 2>&1
autodetect_aperture() is done with image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_042047_TTUQ1b1x1_2380232_sgBblEdj/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-20-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
Waiting for thread 1 to finish...
autodetect_aperture() is done with image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_042047_TTUQ1b1x1_2380232_sgBblEdj/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-19-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
Done with SExtractor!
TIMING SExtractor: 5 seconds
Matching stars between images!
No manually selected comparison stars file manually_selected_comparison_stars.lst which is fine.
Processing /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
9576x6388 FITS image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
Trying to guess the time system by parsing the comment string 'Time of observation (UTC)'
Time system set from the comment to DATE-OBS keyword: 'Time of observation (UTC)'
The input time system is identified as: UTC (blank if unknown)
Setting observation date using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-02-11T07:17:21.7607716
Setting observation time using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-02-11T07:17:21.7607716
Observing time converted to the "standard" FITS header format:
DATE-OBS= 2026-02-11T07:17:21.760
EXPTIME = 20.000
Using the catalog image00001.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
Exposure 20 sec, 11.02.2026 07:17:21.760 UTC = JD(UTC) 2461082.80383981 mid. exp.
The reference image star 4000.952 1321.965 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star 3618.959 1436.178 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star 351.984 1875.986 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star 1545.054 5513.608 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star 5377.018 4998.001 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star 6000.039 4876.966 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
SExtractor output filtering results:
* passed selection: 56231, (56230 good for image matching)
* rejected as having no flux measurement: 0
* rejected as having SNR<3.0: 21
* rejected inside rectangles defined in bad_region.lst: 6
* rejected close to frame edge: 309
* rejected as being too small (<1.2 pix): 0
* rejected as being too large (>4.8 pix): 0
* rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0
* rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0
* rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 94
* rejected due to an external image flag: 0
* rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0
---
You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'.
Please note: the CCD position-dependent magnitude correction will be applied.
get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -7.26
Detection limit from the magnitude-SNR relation= -7.3 (5.0 sigma detection)
The simple faintest star detection limit= -6.5
80 percent brightest stars detection limit= -7.8
Selected detection limit= -7.8
Final detection limit= -7.8 (after subtracting MAG_TRANSIENT_ABOVE_THE_REFERENCE_FRAME_LIMIT=0.0)
Parameter box for transient search: 10.04.8 pix): 0
* rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0
* rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0
* rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 77
* rejected due to an external image flag: 0
* rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0
---
You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'.
56240 * detected, using 500/ 500 * for reference/current image matching, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.012127, number_of_ambiguous_matches=682
refining the coordinate transformation... [CVPOLY iter 1: order=1 pairs=52228 inliers=52228 rms 0.33 -> 0.33 pix, max corner correction 0.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.012144, number_of_ambiguous_matches=683
52228 * matched, [CVPOLY iter 2: order=1 pairs=52228 inliers=52228 rms 0.33 -> 0.33 pix, max corner correction 0.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.010028, number_of_ambiguous_matches=564
52222 * matched (2nd iteration). [CVPOLY iter 3: order=1 pairs=52222 inliers=52222 rms 0.31 -> 0.31 pix, max corner correction 0.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.004392, number_of_ambiguous_matches=247
52193 * matched (3rd iteration). Success!
rotation [degrees] = 0.010
56240 stars detected, 52193 stars matched
Performing magnitude calibration using automatically selected comparison stars
Expecting to find at least 40 * for magnitude calibration
We have N_good_stars = 49270, N_manually_selected_comparison_stars = 0
Using 49270 stars for magnitude calibration (before filtering).
Iteratively removing outliers from the linear mag-mag relation (unweighted fit)...
After removing outliers in (X,Y,dm) plane, we are left with 49270 stars for magnitude calibration.
Using the linear CCD position-dependent magnitude correction:
delta_m = -0.00000*X_pix +0.00000*Y_pix -0.00276
Iteratively removing outliers from the mag-mag relation (weighted linear/polynomial fit)...
Computing robust linear magnitude calibration.
Used 46899 stars for magnitude calibration (after filtering).
get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -7.26
60278 objects stored in memory (1000000 max.)
Magnitude calibration is performed successfully!
Saving observations to the cache... OK
memory: 235668 kB used, 274060 kB peak, 65263848 kB available RAM
processed 2 of 4 images ( 50.0%)
Processing /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_042047_TTUQ1b1x1_2380232_sgBblEdj/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-19-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
9576x6388 FITS image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_042047_TTUQ1b1x1_2380232_sgBblEdj/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-19-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
Trying to guess the time system by parsing the comment string 'Time of observation (UTC)'
Time system set from the comment to DATE-OBS keyword: 'Time of observation (UTC)'
The input time system is identified as: UTC (blank if unknown)
Setting observation date using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-08-16T09:19:12.1196220
Setting observation time using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-08-16T09:19:12.1196220
Observing time converted to the "standard" FITS header format:
DATE-OBS= 2026-08-16T09:19:12.119
EXPTIME = 20.000
Using the catalog image00003.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_042047_TTUQ1b1x1_2380232_sgBblEdj/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-19-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
The star 8497.995 871.987 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 1152.175 919.031 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 3618.916 1436.903 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 351.990 1875.992 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 2635.353 2106.794 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 4923.005 2427.563 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 724.985 2732.004 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 1454.985 3132.992 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 3303.796 3304.987 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 9337.003 3591.000 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
Excluding more stars falling at bad regions!.. (will not print them all)
SExtractor output filtering results:
* passed selection: 12622
* rejected as having no flux measurement: 0
* rejected as having SNR<3.0: 2
* rejected inside rectangles defined in bad_region.lst: 18
* rejected close to frame edge: 72
* rejected as being too small (<1.4 pix): 0
* rejected as being too large (>5.4 pix): 0
* rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0
* rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0
* rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 17
* rejected due to an external image flag: 0
* rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0
---
You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'.
12622 * detected, using 112/ 500 * for reference/current image matching, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000315, number_of_ambiguous_matches=19
refining the coordinate transformation... [CVPOLY iter 1: order=3 pairs=12225 inliers=12225 rms 1.86 -> 0.40 pix, max corner correction 19.4 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000216, number_of_ambiguous_matches=13
12242 * matched, [CVPOLY iter 2: order=1 pairs=12242 inliers=12242 rms 0.34 -> 0.34 pix, max corner correction 0.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000149, number_of_ambiguous_matches=9
12239 * matched (2nd iteration). [CVPOLY iter 3: order=1 pairs=12239 inliers=12239 rms 0.31 -> 0.31 pix, max corner correction 0.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000100, number_of_ambiguous_matches=6
12229 * matched (3rd iteration). Success!
rotation [degrees] = -177.450
12622 stars detected, 12229 stars matched
Performing magnitude calibration using automatically selected comparison stars
Expecting to find at least 40 * for magnitude calibration
We have N_good_stars = 10944, N_manually_selected_comparison_stars = 0
Using 10944 stars for magnitude calibration (before filtering).
Iteratively removing outliers from the linear mag-mag relation (unweighted fit)...
After removing outliers in (X,Y,dm) plane, we are left with 9617 stars for magnitude calibration.
Using the linear CCD position-dependent magnitude correction:
delta_m = 0.00016*X_pix -0.00008*Y_pix -0.03122
ERROR in magnitude calibration: fabs(lin_mag_A * X_im_size + lin_mag_C) > MAX_LIN_CORR_MAG
Used 9617 stars for magnitude calibration (after filtering).
get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -7.78
[01;31m ERROR!!! Magnitude calibration failure. Dropping image. [33;00m
60278 objects stored in memory (1000000 max.)
memory: 228148 kB used, 274060 kB peak, 65263848 kB available RAM
processed 3 of 4 images ( 75.0%)
Processing /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_042047_TTUQ1b1x1_2380232_sgBblEdj/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-20-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
9576x6388 FITS image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_042047_TTUQ1b1x1_2380232_sgBblEdj/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-20-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
Trying to guess the time system by parsing the comment string 'Time of observation (UTC)'
Time system set from the comment to DATE-OBS keyword: 'Time of observation (UTC)'
The input time system is identified as: UTC (blank if unknown)
Setting observation date using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-08-16T09:20:03.9133731
Setting observation time using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-08-16T09:20:03.9133731
Observing time converted to the "standard" FITS header format:
DATE-OBS= 2026-08-16T09:20:03.913
EXPTIME = 20.000
Using the catalog image00004.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_042047_TTUQ1b1x1_2380232_sgBblEdj/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-20-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
The star 8498.032 871.975 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 1152.029 918.995 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 190.988 1039.993 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 3618.998 1436.995 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 351.988 1876.000 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 8838.996 2029.950 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 2638.811 2108.101 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 4923.032 2428.011 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 725.012 2731.981 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 1454.992 3133.018 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
Excluding more stars falling at bad regions!.. (will not print them all)
SExtractor output filtering results:
* passed selection: 12716
* rejected as having no flux measurement: 0
* rejected as having SNR<3.0: 1
* rejected inside rectangles defined in bad_region.lst: 21
* rejected close to frame edge: 59
* rejected as being too small (<1.4 pix): 0
* rejected as being too large (>5.4 pix): 0
* rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0
* rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0
* rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 10
* rejected due to an external image flag: 0
* rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0
---
You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'.
12716 * detected, using 113/ 500 * for reference/current image matching, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000166, number_of_ambiguous_matches=10
refining the coordinate transformation... [CVPOLY iter 1: order=3 pairs=12361 inliers=12361 rms 1.17 -> 0.38 pix, max corner correction 18.2 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000182, number_of_ambiguous_matches=11
12378 * matched, [CVPOLY iter 2: order=3 pairs=12378 inliers=12378 rms 0.35 -> 0.34 pix, max corner correction 2.3 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000182, number_of_ambiguous_matches=11
12374 * matched (2nd iteration). [CVPOLY iter 3: order=1 pairs=12374 inliers=12374 rms 0.31 -> 0.31 pix, max corner correction 0.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000083, number_of_ambiguous_matches=5
12367 * matched (3rd iteration). Success!
rotation [degrees] = -177.463
12716 stars detected, 12367 stars matched
Performing magnitude calibration using automatically selected comparison stars
Expecting to find at least 40 * for magnitude calibration
We have N_good_stars = 11056, N_manually_selected_comparison_stars = 0
Using 11056 stars for magnitude calibration (before filtering).
Iteratively removing outliers from the linear mag-mag relation (unweighted fit)...
After removing outliers in (X,Y,dm) plane, we are left with 9707 stars for magnitude calibration.
Using the linear CCD position-dependent magnitude correction:
delta_m = 0.00015*X_pix -0.00007*Y_pix -0.02520
ERROR in magnitude calibration: fabs(lin_mag_A * X_im_size + lin_mag_C) > MAX_LIN_CORR_MAG
Used 9707 stars for magnitude calibration (after filtering).
get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -7.78
[01;31m ERROR!!! Magnitude calibration failure. Dropping image. [33;00m
60278 objects stored in memory (1000000 max.)
memory: 228148 kB used, 274060 kB peak, 65263848 kB available RAM
processed 4 of 4 images (100.0%)
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 2 seconds
Done with measurements! =)
Total number of measurements 112471 (112471 measurements stored in RAM)
Freeing up some memory... Sorting the measurements cached in memory...
Writing lightcurve (outNNNNN.dat) files...
TIMING lightcurve_write: 2 seconds
The lightcurve files have been written, freeing up more memory...
Creating vast_image_details.log ...
Writing summary file: vast_summary.log ... OK
Selecting the best aperture for each source
Aperture with index 0 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.00*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 9114 stars
Aperture with index 1 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.00*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 0 stars
Aperture with index 2 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER -0.10*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 15223 stars
Aperture with index 3 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.10*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 8244 stars
Aperture with index 4 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.20*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 6307 stars
Aperture with index 5 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.30*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 13305 stars
done! =)
TIMING select_aperture: 2 seconds
Computing lightcurve statistics... Will not compute variability indexes for objects having <1 points in lightcurve
You may disable this by commenting out the line '#define DROP_LIGHTCURVES_WITH_SMALL_NUMBER_OF_POINTS_FROM_ALL_PLOTS' in src/vast_limits.h an re-compiling VaST with 'make'
Computing, please wait a bit
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
vast_lightcurve_statistics.log: 51893 objects, the longest string is 383 bytes.
Allocating memory for resorting the file.
----***** VaST processing WARNING *****----
You asked VaST to process 4 images, but only 1 were actually matched to the reference one.
Please investigate this!
**************************************************************
This error might be a bug, but it is far more likely that it is caused by
inappropriate input data. A few simple things to check in the diagnostic
messages printed above (or the vast*.log files):
* How many of the input images are matched?
* Does the number of detected stars on each image look reasonable?
* Do images have a sufficient overlap of at least about 20 percent?
You may run
./sextract_single_image /path/to/my/image/file.fit
to see how well VaST detects stars with the current SExtractor settings
(star detection settings can be changed in the default.sex configuration
file, see various examples in the VaST directory).
If you cannot identify the problem, please e-mail Kirill Sokolovsky
Please try to describe the problem in details and, if possible, attach vast_summary.log
file and a few example images. If the images are too big to be sent by e-mail, please
upload them through a web-form http://scan.sai.msu.ru/upload/
**************************************************************
Low percentage of matched images - we'll declare this an unsuccessful VaST run (exit code 1)
_____________________
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_042047_TTUQ1b1x1_2380232_sgBblEdj/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-19-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_042047_TTUQ1b1x1_2380232_sgBblEdj/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-20-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
Last image: 2461268.88845045 16.08.2026 09:19:12.119 UTC
ERROR running VaST on the field UMa-02-Q1b1x1 (less than 4 images processed)
exp_start= 11.02.2026 07:17:21.760 exp= 20.000 JD= 2461082.80383981 ap= 4.8 rotation= 0.000 *detected= 56231 *matched= 56231 status=OK /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
exp_start= 11.02.2026 07:18:03.267 exp= 20.000 JD= 2461082.80432022 ap= 4.8 rotation= 0.010 *detected= 56240 *matched= 52193 status=OK /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
exp_start= 16.08.2026 09:19:12.119 exp= 20.000 JD= 2461268.88845045 ap= 5.4 rotation= -177.450 *detected= 12622 *matched= 12229 status=ERROR /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_042047_TTUQ1b1x1_2380232_sgBblEdj/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-19-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
exp_start= 16.08.2026 09:20:03.913 exp= 20.000 JD= 2461268.88904992 ap= 5.4 rotation= -177.463 *detected= 12716 *matched= 12367 status=ERROR /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_042047_TTUQ1b1x1_2380232_sgBblEdj/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-16_04-20-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
########### Completed UMa-02-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
###################################################################################
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461268.88845045 -observatory V36
08:57:19.25 +18:27:11.9 Mercury (-1.4mag)
12:30:47.89 -04:59:13.4 Venus (-4.4mag)
06:12:52.40 +23:42:29.6 Mars (1.3mag)
08:50:14.82 +18:13:37.9 Jupiter (-1.8mag)
00:55:38.32 +03:08:13.4 Saturn (0.6mag)
04:12:34.04 +20:59:06.8 Uranus (5.7mag)
00:15:34.63 +00:09:23.5 Neptune (7.7mag)
20:27:22.53 -23:33:11.6 Pluto (14.5mag)
12:31:19.70 -07:34:43.0 Moon (-9.3mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Aug 16 04:22 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461268.88845045:
08:50:18.84 +18:13:21.5 Io (6.1mag)
08:50:20.09 +18:13:14.7 Europa (6.3mag)
08:50:28.05 +18:12:36.9 Ganymede (5.6mag)
08:50:14.93 +18:13:35.3 Callisto (6.8mag)
08:47:43.08 +18:18:01.0 Himalia (15.7mag)
08:50:12.90 +18:13:47.0 Thebe (16.6mag)
08:47:19.92 +18:14:57.6 Elara (17.7mag)
08:54:23.56 +17:49:23.8 Pasiphae (17.9mag)
08:52:52.68 +18:25:45.7 Carme (19.0mag)
00:55:48.82 +03:07:46.6 Titan (8.4mag)
00:55:35.81 +03:07:57.1 Rhea (9.7mag)
00:56:07.06 +03:08:43.0 Iapetus (11.1mag)
00:55:51.18 +03:07:38.2 Hyperion (14.4mag)
00:54:50.39 +03:00:21.8 Phoebe (16.4mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Aug 16 04:22 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461268.88845045:
19:38:54.94 -18:19:33.7 JWST
16:10:30.10 +47:39:17.7 Chandra
11:16:15.67 -60:09:18.9 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Aug 16 04:22 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461268.88845045 -observatory V36
03:22:29.19 +18:01:24.3 17.6mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist)
18:00:10.13 -34:33:14.6 14.1mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
07:01:15.29 -69:13:30.2 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
06:11:51.11 +33:10:15.4 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
04:06:28.22 +40:43:58.3 17.2mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
22:31:48.10 +30:53:05.9 17.3mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
06:51:25.09 +26:23:43.7 16.8mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
10:29:09.01 +28:06:27.1 17.0mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
09:34:19.97 +05:18:33.2 17.9mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
15:14:06.18 -12:37:03.1 17.9mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
21:00:19.40 +64:59:06.4 17.9mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
15:40:35.93 -13:41:29.2 14.5mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
08:17:02.81 +31:43:20.6 15.4mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:05:58.75 +15:33:35.9 17.8mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
18:53:17.49 +43:24:54.1 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
20:58:28.37 +49:35:01.5 17.5mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS)
05:21:28.21 -12:54:16.2 15.4mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
07:01:17.76 +22:42:01.8 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
10:44:29.10 +20:22:19.4 17.2mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
13:03:17.18 +01:47:20.3 16.9mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
16:04:51.56 +76:59:27.1 16.6mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
03:09:35.68 +46:18:50.5 17.2mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
11:53:39.57 +09:22:29.4 17.4mag A/2026 E1
22:06:48.89 -30:26:45.2 7.0mag 10P/Tempel
11:33:56.95 -03:55:07.7 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
11:24:18.81 +01:58:09.0 17.3mag 63P/Wild
00:53:09.90 -05:47:41.9 15.4mag 65P/Gunn
05:53:49.97 +20:29:20.5 13.7mag 78P/Gehrels
20:30:41.55 -24:25:23.9 17.6mag 84P/Giclas
03:07:57.09 +14:13:55.2 16.8mag 88P/Howell
08:16:17.83 +26:30:01.6 16.3mag 93P/Lovas
04:29:44.80 +20:03:45.8 17.4mag 112P/Urata-Niijima
06:23:18.95 +29:16:46.0 16.2mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
09:37:45.65 +25:12:49.2 14.9mag 123P/West-Hartley
12:00:12.36 -13:22:38.0 17.2mag 124P/Mrkos
05:48:24.88 +21:07:04.6 16.0mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
06:42:16.15 +18:28:03.6 17.9mag 131P/Mueller
00:01:34.76 +03:16:25.9 17.5mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma
03:15:45.57 -18:51:17.2 13.3mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
07:43:59.15 +38:05:28.9 16.0mag 162P/Siding Spring
12:29:21.87 +38:03:59.1 12.0mag 169P/NEAT
02:57:07.28 +09:31:45.7 17.6mag 220P/McNaught
16:46:25.87 -10:41:36.1 17.9mag 235P/LINEAR
20:17:57.79 -52:26:19.7 17.9mag 259P/Garradd
03:45:57.25 +28:31:29.5 15.3mag 260P/McNaught
07:29:49.44 +37:25:52.9 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR
15:13:29.26 +02:13:45.5 17.8mag 391P/Kowalski
09:08:19.54 +17:58:14.1 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.3K Aug 16 04:22 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08
22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17
14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02
12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61
16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09
01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97
21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13
18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06
12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98
13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38
18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63
14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36
20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83
18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86
03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12
18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16
04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02
18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73
17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01
14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46
10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67
14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11
10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58
19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5
02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86
23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47
02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78
18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29
13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72
17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66
11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3
23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15
20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53
19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88
11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82
19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31
17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67
19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52
18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92
19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91
19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81
04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96
13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01
16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07
10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63
14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62
13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09
00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13
11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56
21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14
17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72
14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53
20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4
15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57
23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64
17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15
00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20 AT2026ntk 2026-06-18.09 17.34
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93
23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83
02:02:26.67 +32:04:22.70 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.6 15.52
21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05
17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62
13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24
00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22
14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32
12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69
12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02
10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75
13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58
00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58
01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70 SN 2026obc 2026-06-7.43 15.15
21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90 ASASSN-26dr 2026-06-7.24 16.24
06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00 ASASSN-26ds 2026-06-2.97 15.02
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12
11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63
11:44:33.11 -68:48:32.90 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24.03 8.35
19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28
14:23:56.59 -58:37:47.40 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.59
11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86
00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34
15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44
11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55
13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96
02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37
17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8
16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8
09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63
21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9
14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21
14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89
12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5
13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23
09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51
15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.40 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.07 13.88
10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52
22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2
21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51
16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.15 15.93
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Aug 16 04:22 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2 PNV J00423868+4115582 2026-06-05.1224 19.97Umag
19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7 PNV J19004295-4831017 2026-05-25.0752 14.2mag
09:55:21.28 +69:02:52.6 PNV J09552128+6902526 2026-06-13.933 18.9mag
19:51:21.42 +37:06:40.0 TCP J19512142+3706400 2026-06-17.2942 16.8mag
19:57:03.87 +37:41:46.4 TCP J19570387+3741464 2026-06-18.2638 17.5mag
00:42:32.04 +41:10:28.3 PNV J00423204+4110283 2026-06-26.059 16.6mag
02:19:17.36 +28:57:15.8 TCP J02191736+2857158 2026-07-12.3549 12.5mag
00:44:56.43 +41:57:41.6 PNV J00445643+4157416 2026-07-13.8026 17.98Cmag
00:42:55.36 +41:17:27.0 PNV J00425536+4117270 2026-07-20.1813 17.7mag
20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9 TCP J20354364+6131329 2026-07-20.5443 14.4mag
21:17:31.48 +22:25:51.0 TCP J21173148+2225510 2026-07-23.5577 14.8mag
00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8 PNV J00412404+4049028 2026-07-25.0157 18.7mag
00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6 PNV J00430426+4102286 2026-07-26.1512 20mag
14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0 TCP J14515140+6613240 2026-07-29.2561 13.5mag
00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2 PNV J00430615+4122082 2026-07-30.0085 19.4mag
00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2 PNV J00413323+4110122 2026-08-02.8913 17.1mag
05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-06.4109 11.2mag
22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8 TCP J22571796+4707418 2026-08-09.3289 14.3mag
09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1 PSN J09133817+7628181 2026-08-09.8037 15.4mag
00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6 PNV J00431729+4126486 2026-08-14.0920 16.8mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 190K Aug 16 04:22 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
23:37:50.618 -01:46:17.45 AT 2026wuz 2026-07-25.58 20.15
00:30:26.145 +29:31:04.56 AT 2026wuy 2026-07-23.54 21.23
23:43:45.878 +27:53:57.40 AT 2026wux 2026-07-27.51 20.99
17:05:21.182 +29:02:19.42 AT 2026wuw 2026-03-09.61 21.2
16:00:25.159 +52:39:29.32 AT 2026wuv 2026-05-24.44 21
15:12:38.490 +17:08:40.32 AT 2026wuu 2026-07-06.38 20.78
20:34:48.010 -30:46:06.82 AT 2026wut 2026-07-08.49 20.87
13:24:16.058 -23:32:48.97 AT 2026wus 2026-05-21.31 20.5
15:52:09.810 +21:23:36.58 AT 2026wur 2026-05-19.33 21.14
17:21:27.821 +31:45:59.75 AT 2026wuq 2026-07-24.44 20.99
16:06:39.962 -00:03:48.96 AT 2026wup 2026-07-08.37 20.6
23:36:31.132 -01:42:30.56 AT 2026wuo 2026-07-25.58 21.53
14:58:54.953 +20:56:59.36 AT 2026wun 2026-06-12.38 21.33
13:29:54.424 -08:02:17.84 AT 2026wum 2026-05-12.34 21.76
15:31:56.171 -23:07:56.50 AT 2026wul 2026-07-16.29 21.12
15:50:35.869 +16:13:29.04 AT 2026wuk 2026-06-08.46 20.66
14:46:52.387 +23:41:33.95 AT 2026wuj 2026-07-19.29 20.84
02:33:14.312 +23:53:11.23 AT 2026wui 2026-07-25.60 21.47
23:59:19.033 +30:37:28.65 AT 2026wuh 2026-07-23.54 21.33
16:12:22.633 +29:40:38.32 AT 2026wug 2026-05-17.56 21.06
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 87K Aug 16 04:22 tns_transients_list.txt