This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_011641_TTUQ2b1x1_754242_ygR3U4sP
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 16.2541 2461268.7541 9.36 20:17:00.67 -25:53:24.2
17.00885 -29.41683 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 9.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.324 Bamberga 2 1 2 9.6 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:17:00.67 -25:53:24.2: 14.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:17:00.67 -25:53:24.2: 14.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 16.2541* 20 17 00.67 -25 53 24.2 9.4 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461268.7541,9.36,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260816.2541 9.36CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 16.2541 2461268.7541 10.05 20:03:30.48 -22:16:08.3
19.71123 -25.31191 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 9.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASAS J200331-2216.1
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.280 V Y 1.170 V 2452222.80000 112.449242000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:03:30.48 -22:16:08.3: 11.07 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:03:30.48 -22:16:08.3: 10.92 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.99 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J200331-2216.1,2461268.7541,10.05,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J200331-2216.1 20260816.2541 10.05CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461229.82627380 08.07.2026 07:49:40.056 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
First image: 2461229.82627380 08.07.2026 07:49:40.056 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Last image: 2461268.75442336 16.08.2026 06:06:12.178 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_011641_TTUQ2b1x1_754242_ygR3U4sP/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 10
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.32
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6852
Objects passed selection criteria: 6835
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5134
Average stars matched: 4367 (85.0604 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 232432 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Aug 16 01:30:54 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461229.82627380 08.07.2026 07:49:40.056 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
First image: 2461229.82627380 08.07.2026 07:49:40.056 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Last image: 2461268.75442336 16.08.2026 06:06:12.178 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_011641_TTUQ2b1x1_754242_ygR3U4sP/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 61
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.95
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 27 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 49805
Objects passed selection criteria: 49700
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 40067.5
Average stars matched: 35624.8 (88.9118 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 266228 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Aug 16 01:32:21 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_011641_TTUQ2b1x1_754242_ygR3U4sP/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-05-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0248.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_011641_TTUQ2b1x1_754242_ygR3U4sP/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_011641_TTUQ2b1x1_754242_ygR3U4sP/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-05-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0248.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_011641_TTUQ2b1x1_754242_ygR3U4sP/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461268.75386404
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-05-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0248.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.7' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:09:36.749 -25:59:53.37 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-05-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0248.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-05-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0248.fits
Image size: 936.9'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:09:36.141 -26:01:07.83 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:09:36.749 -25:59:53.37
Second-epoch image center 20:09:36.141 -26:01:07.83
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0208 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits
Image size: 936.9'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:09:34.583 -26:00:18.83 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:09:36.749 -25:59:53.37
Second-epoch image center 20:09:34.583 -26:00:18.83
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0108 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:09:36.141 -26:01:07.83
Second-epoch second image center 20:09:34.583 -26:00:18.83
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01481 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PmKKRvebw2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits &> /tmp/tmp.HRTv2I4t02
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_011641_TTUQ2b1x1_754242_ygR3U4sP/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-05-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0248.fits &> /tmp/tmp.tDTrQu0pDa
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_011641_TTUQ2b1x1_754242_ygR3U4sP/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-05-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0248.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_011641_TTUQ2b1x1_754242_ygR3U4sP/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits &> /tmp/tmp.07a3hUMX2Z
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_011641_TTUQ2b1x1_754242_ygR3U4sP/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits and wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits and wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits and wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 5807 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 293.3718 to 311.4457 deg, Dec -31.2594 to -20.5684 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 293.3718 to 311.4457 deg, Dec -31.2594 to -20.5684 deg
Loaded 9413 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4837 out of 4937 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4937 out of 5807 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.371200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.371200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.32
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.05
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.05
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 5807 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 293.3718 to 311.4457 deg, Dec -31.2594 to -20.5684 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 293.3718 to 311.4457 deg, Dec -31.2594 to -20.5684 deg
Loaded 9413 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4837 out of 4937 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4937 out of 5807 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits (aperture=6.5)
Read 6163 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 293.3742 to 311.4456 deg, Dec -31.2699 to -20.5799 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 293.3742 to 311.4456 deg, Dec -31.2699 to -20.5799 deg
Loaded 9413 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5072 out of 5182 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5182 out of 6163 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits (aperture=6.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 10 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
2.3 pix Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
2.8 pix fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-05-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0248.fits
2.6 pix fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.0 mag. Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
14.1 mag. Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-05-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0248.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.2 (SNR ) 11.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.PmKKRvebw2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_011641_TTUQ2b1x1_754242_ygR3U4sP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=383, bad_region=1211, passed=5807
Got 5807 stars (including 4291 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5807 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4233 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4219 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4219 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4219 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4832 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4233 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4219 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4832 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4219 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4832 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 4219 stars left (next iteration limit 4640)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits N_match=4219 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.419 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.518 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.380 n_q1=1415 n_q2=661 n_q3=1449 n_q4=694 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.236
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits -region wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.HRTv2I4t02 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_011641_TTUQ2b1x1_754242_ygR3U4sP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=423, bad_region=1252, passed=6163
Got 6163 stars (including 4578 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6163 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4517 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4500 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4500 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4500 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5162 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4517 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4500 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5162 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4500 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5162 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 4500 stars left (next iteration limit 4950)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits N_match=4500 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.414 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.527 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.379 n_q1=1505 n_q2=683 n_q3=1568 n_q4=744 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.274
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits -region wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.tDTrQu0pDa (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_011641_TTUQ2b1x1_754242_ygR3U4sP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_011641_TTUQ2b1x1_754242_ygR3U4sP/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-05-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0248.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_011641_TTUQ2b1x1_754242_ygR3U4sP/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-05-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0248.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_011641_TTUQ2b1x1_754242_ygR3U4sP/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-05-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0248.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_011641_TTUQ2b1x1_754242_ygR3U4sP/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-05-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0248.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_011641_TTUQ2b1x1_754242_ygR3U4sP/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-05-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0248.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_011641_TTUQ2b1x1_754242_ygR3U4sP/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-05-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0248.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-05-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0248.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-05-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0248.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-05-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0248.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-05-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0248.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-05-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0248.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-05-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0248.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-05-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0248.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_011641_TTUQ2b1x1_754242_ygR3U4sP/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-05-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0248.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-05-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0248.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=306, bad_region=1772, passed=7423
Got 7423 stars (including 5402 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-05-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0248.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7423 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4912 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5997 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5997 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5997 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 4912 stars left (next iteration limit 5403)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4912 robust_rms=6.696 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=8.813 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4912 robust_rms=0.437 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.488 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4912 robust_rms=0.418 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.481 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=4912 robust_rms_before=0.805 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.433 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.437 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.522 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.488
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.522 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-05-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0248.fits N_match=4912 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.426 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.402 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.505 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.406 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.426 n_q1=1685 n_q2=881 n_q3=1435 n_q4=911 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.185
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-05-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0248.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-05-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0248.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_011641_TTUQ2b1x1_754242_ygR3U4sP/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-05-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0248.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-05-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0248.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-05-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0248.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.07a3hUMX2Z (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_011641_TTUQ2b1x1_754242_ygR3U4sP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_011641_TTUQ2b1x1_754242_ygR3U4sP/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_011641_TTUQ2b1x1_754242_ygR3U4sP/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_011641_TTUQ2b1x1_754242_ygR3U4sP/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_011641_TTUQ2b1x1_754242_ygR3U4sP/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_011641_TTUQ2b1x1_754242_ygR3U4sP/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_011641_TTUQ2b1x1_754242_ygR3U4sP/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_011641_TTUQ2b1x1_754242_ygR3U4sP/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=381, bad_region=1838, passed=7334
Got 7334 stars (including 5216 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7334 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4912 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5846 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5846 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5846 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 4909 stars left (next iteration limit 5403)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4909 robust_rms=6.687 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=9.082 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4909 robust_rms=0.415 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.491 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4909 robust_rms=0.398 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.482 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=4909 robust_rms_before=0.752 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.417 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.415 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.531 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.491
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.531 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits N_match=4909 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.424 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.515 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.447 n_q1=1687 n_q2=892 n_q3=1436 n_q4=894 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.215
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_011641_TTUQ2b1x1_754242_ygR3U4sP/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-05-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0248.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-05-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0248.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-05-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0248.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits sigma_overall=0.419 worst_q_ratio=1.236
ref2=Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits sigma_overall=0.414 worst_q_ratio=1.274
new1=fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-05-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0248.fits sigma_overall=0.426 worst_q_ratio=1.185
new2=fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits sigma_overall=0.424 worst_q_ratio=1.215
reference average sigma_overall=0.4165 worst_q_ratio=1.255
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156_astrometric_residuals.png (4219 matched stars from wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205_astrometric_residuals.png (4500 matched stars from wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-05-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0248_astrometric_residuals.png (4912 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-05-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0248.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249_astrometric_residuals.png (4909 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-05-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0248.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-05-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0248.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_011641_TTUQ2b1x1_754242_ygR3U4sP/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-05-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0248.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_011641_TTUQ2b1x1_754242_ygR3U4sP/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:25:37.07 -24:27:45.8: 11.42 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:12:03.55 -24:24:09.9: 11.60 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:16:45.72 -26:44:08.6: 11.31 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:09:53.06 -27:35:06.4: 11.26 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:17:00.67 -25:53:24.2: 14.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:09:38.95 -29:25:30.5: 11.83 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:19:24.91 -25:13:42.2: 11.33 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:03:30.48 -22:16:08.3: 11.07 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:25:37.07 -24:27:45.8: 11.53 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:12:03.55 -24:24:09.9: 11.66 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:16:45.72 -26:44:08.6: 11.28 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:19:24.91 -25:13:42.2: 11.29 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:09:53.06 -27:35:06.4: 11.28 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:09:38.95 -29:25:30.5: 11.69 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.47 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:03:30.48 -22:16:08.3: 10.92 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.29 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:17:00.67 -25:53:24.2: 14.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.63 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:25:37.07 -24:27:45.8: ref_mag=11.47 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.9210 delta=0.55 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.31 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.27 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:12:03.55 -24:24:09.9: ref_mag=11.63 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.1099 delta=0.52 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:16:45.72 -26:44:08.6: ref_mag=11.29 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.2690 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.74 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:19:24.91 -25:13:42.2: ref_mag=11.31 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.1715 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.99 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:09:53.06 -27:35:06.4: ref_mag=11.27 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.2630 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:09:38.95 -29:25:30.5: ref_mag=11.74 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.2802 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:03:30.48 -22:16:08.3: ref_mag=10.99 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.0510 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out05404.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20621.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20621_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249
Preparing report for the candidate 20621_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20968_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 20968_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:54:19.65 -23:55:52.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21188_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 21188_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21350_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 21350_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21365_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 21365_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21368_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 21368_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:56:50.95 -27:11:32.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21431_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 21431_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21455_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 21455_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21456_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 21456_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05404_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249
Preparing report for the candidate 05404_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 10s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cap-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
20:03:30.48 -22:16:08.3
20:17:00.67 -25:53:24.2
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_011641_TTUQ2b1x1_754242_ygR3U4sP/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-05-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0248.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_011641_TTUQ2b1x1_754242_ygR3U4sP/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_011641_TTUQ2b1x1_754242_ygR3U4sP/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-05-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0248.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_011641_TTUQ2b1x1_754242_ygR3U4sP/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-05-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0248.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-05-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0248.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.7' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:09:36.749 -25:59:53.37 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-05-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0248.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-05-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0248.fits
Image size: 936.9'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:09:36.141 -26:01:07.83 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:09:36.749 -25:59:53.37
Second-epoch image center 20:09:36.141 -26:01:07.83
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0208 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits
Image size: 936.9'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:09:34.583 -26:00:18.83 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:09:36.749 -25:59:53.37
Second-epoch image center 20:09:34.583 -26:00:18.83
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0108 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:09:36.141 -26:01:07.83
Second-epoch second image center 20:09:34.583 -26:00:18.83
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01481 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WN04yt9kPm
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits &> /tmp/tmp.a0neznSTyJ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_011641_TTUQ2b1x1_754242_ygR3U4sP/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-05-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0248.fits &> /tmp/tmp.slcIchmtU2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_011641_TTUQ2b1x1_754242_ygR3U4sP/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-05-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0248.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_011641_TTUQ2b1x1_754242_ygR3U4sP/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits &> /tmp/tmp.EW1Pf1Hh3r
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_011641_TTUQ2b1x1_754242_ygR3U4sP/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits and wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits and wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits and wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 49567 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 293.3398 to 311.4646 deg, Dec -31.2669 to -20.5506 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 293.3398 to 311.4646 deg, Dec -31.2669 to -20.5506 deg
Loaded 9468 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7598 out of 8155 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8155 out of 49567 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.155050
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.155050
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.95
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.21
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.21
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 49567 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 293.3398 to 311.4646 deg, Dec -31.2669 to -20.5506 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 293.3398 to 311.4646 deg, Dec -31.2669 to -20.5506 deg
Loaded 9468 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7598 out of 8155 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8155 out of 49567 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 52342 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 293.3394 to 311.4652 deg, Dec -31.2712 to -20.5387 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 293.3394 to 311.4652 deg, Dec -31.2712 to -20.5387 deg
Loaded 9484 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7577 out of 8158 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8158 out of 52342 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 40 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
2.1 pix Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
2.8 pix fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-05-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0248.fits
2.5 pix fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.2 mag. Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
14.3 mag. Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-05-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0248.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.3 (SNR ) 13.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.WN04yt9kPm (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_011641_TTUQ2b1x1_754242_ygR3U4sP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=2048, bad_region=8774, passed=49557
Got 49557 stars (including 38989 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 49557 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4915 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42826 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42826 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42826 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 4916 stars left (next iteration limit 5406)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits N_match=4916 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.407 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.515 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.371 n_q1=1723 n_q2=851 n_q3=1523 n_q4=819 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.265
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits -region wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.a0neznSTyJ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_011641_TTUQ2b1x1_754242_ygR3U4sP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=2212, bad_region=9047, passed=52328
Got 52328 stars (including 41340 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 52328 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4915 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45370 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45370 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45370 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 4914 stars left (next iteration limit 5406)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits N_match=4914 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.397 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.512 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.373 n_q1=1727 n_q2=835 n_q3=1536 n_q4=816 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.290
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits -region wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.slcIchmtU2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_011641_TTUQ2b1x1_754242_ygR3U4sP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_011641_TTUQ2b1x1_754242_ygR3U4sP/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-05-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0248.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_011641_TTUQ2b1x1_754242_ygR3U4sP/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-05-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0248.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_011641_TTUQ2b1x1_754242_ygR3U4sP/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-05-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0248.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_011641_TTUQ2b1x1_754242_ygR3U4sP/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-05-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0248.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_011641_TTUQ2b1x1_754242_ygR3U4sP/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-05-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0248.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_011641_TTUQ2b1x1_754242_ygR3U4sP/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-05-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0248.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-05-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0248.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-05-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0248.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-05-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0248.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-05-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0248.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-05-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0248.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-05-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0248.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-05-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0248.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_011641_TTUQ2b1x1_754242_ygR3U4sP/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-05-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0248.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-05-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0248.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=2381, bad_region=8928, passed=46234
Got 46234 stars (including 35794 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-05-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0248.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 46234 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4919 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39465 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39465 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39465 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 4919 stars left (next iteration limit 5410)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-05-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0248.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4919 robust_rms=6.640 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=9.325 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4919 robust_rms=0.440 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.488 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4919 robust_rms=0.419 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.483 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=4919 robust_rms_before=0.817 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.432 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.440 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.518 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.488
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.518 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-05-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0248.fits N_match=4919 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.426 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.502 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.413 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.421 n_q1=1696 n_q2=851 n_q3=1494 n_q4=878 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.178
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-05-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0248.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-05-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0248.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_011641_TTUQ2b1x1_754242_ygR3U4sP/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-05-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0248.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-05-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0248.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-05-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0248.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.EW1Pf1Hh3r (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-16_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_011641_TTUQ2b1x1_754242_ygR3U4sP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_011641_TTUQ2b1x1_754242_ygR3U4sP/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_011641_TTUQ2b1x1_754242_ygR3U4sP/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_011641_TTUQ2b1x1_754242_ygR3U4sP/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_011641_TTUQ2b1x1_754242_ygR3U4sP/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_011641_TTUQ2b1x1_754242_ygR3U4sP/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_011641_TTUQ2b1x1_754242_ygR3U4sP/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_011641_TTUQ2b1x1_754242_ygR3U4sP/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=2956, bad_region=9486, passed=49608
Got 49608 stars (including 38609 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 49608 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42361 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42361 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42361 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 4915 stars left (next iteration limit 5407)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4915 robust_rms=6.591 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=9.082 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4915 robust_rms=0.415 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.472 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4915 robust_rms=0.396 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.467 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=4915 robust_rms_before=0.760 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.413 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.415 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.489 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.472
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.489 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits N_match=4915 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.384 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.498 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.431 n_q1=1705 n_q2=856 n_q3=1500 n_q4=854 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.207
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_011641_TTUQ2b1x1_754242_ygR3U4sP/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-05-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0248.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_011641_TTUQ2b1x1_754242_ygR3U4sP/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-05-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0248.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-16_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_011641_TTUQ2b1x1_754242_ygR3U4sP/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:55:48.64 -22:09:52.2: 13.43 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:00:05.57 -22:00:19.0: 13.82 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:22:45.91 -23:28:46.1: 12.70 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:52:40.74 -26:50:28.4: 12.09 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:56:51.72 -23:39:24.9: 13.29 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:16:11.08 -22:48:27.7: 13.39 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:52:47.05 -27:33:20.5: 13.69 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:58:18.46 -22:20:22.4: 13.30 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:04:02.60 -21:58:59.3: 13.42 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:52:37.12 -24:58:37.7: 13.39 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:58:18.46 -22:20:22.4: 13.35 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:16:11.08 -22:48:27.7: 13.34 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:52:47.05 -27:33:20.5: 13.84 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:55:48.64 -22:09:52.2: 13.51 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:00:05.57 -22:00:19.0: 13.96 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:56:51.72 -23:39:24.9: 13.19 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:22:45.91 -23:28:46.1: 12.86 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:52:40.74 -26:50:28.4: 12.09 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.36 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.89 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.78 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:16:11.08 -22:48:27.7: ref_mag=13.36 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.6615 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:58:18.46 -22:20:22.4: ref_mag=13.33 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.5274 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.09 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.23 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:55:48.64 -22:09:52.2: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.5301 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:52:47.05 -27:33:20.5: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.7148 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:00:05.57 -22:00:19.0: ref_mag=13.89 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.5642 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:22:45.91 -23:28:46.1: ref_mag=12.78 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.0626 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:52:40.74 -26:50:28.4: ref_mag=12.09 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.2715 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:56:51.72 -23:39:24.9: ref_mag=13.23 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.4272 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:04:02.60 -21:58:59.3: 13.38 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:52:37.12 -24:58:37.7: 13.71 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.39 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.52 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:04:02.60 -21:58:59.3: ref_mag=13.39 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.6538 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:52:37.12 -24:58:37.7: ref_mag=13.52 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.4632 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:02:48.39 -22:51:59.3: 13.94 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:09:05.03 -24:33:22.7: 13.91 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:53:41.78 -22:26:41.0: 13.45 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:14:28.99 -21:58:46.5: 14.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:22:53.70 -22:59:49.8: 13.69 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:04:23.87 -23:09:55.7: 13.67 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:50:23.18 -23:07:53.3: 13.74 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:06:06.54 -21:53:39.1: 13.71 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:57:28.89 -23:24:01.2: 14.00 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:52:20.07 -24:18:39.7: 13.93 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:14:28.99 -21:58:46.5: 14.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:09:05.03 -24:33:22.7: 13.69 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:53:41.78 -22:26:41.0: 13.49 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:50:23.18 -23:07:53.3: 13.73 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.77 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:02:48.39 -22:51:59.3: 13.84 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:09:05.03 -24:33:22.7: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.7432 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.73 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:53:41.78 -22:26:41.0: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.6578 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:22:53.70 -22:59:49.8: 13.96 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:04:23.87 -23:09:55.7: 13.64 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:06:06.54 -21:53:39.1: 13.78 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:50:23.18 -23:07:53.3: ref_mag=13.73 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.6794 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:52:20.07 -24:18:39.7: 14.09 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:57:28.89 -23:24:01.2: 13.74 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:02:48.39 -22:51:59.3: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.6743 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.74 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.65 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:22:53.70 -22:59:49.8: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.7485 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.00 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:04:23.87 -23:09:55.7: ref_mag=13.65 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.6600 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:06:06.54 -21:53:39.1: ref_mag=13.74 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.6506 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:52:20.07 -24:18:39.7: ref_mag=14.00 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.6288 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:57:28.89 -23:24:01.2: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.6469 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:52:31.54 -22:02:47.5: 14.01 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:07:23.46 -22:48:44.1: 13.87 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:59:28.66 -21:44:36.9: 14.07 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:54:30.71 -22:42:42.6: 13.99 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:07:06.51 -22:12:22.1: 14.01 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:58:35.01 -22:40:45.9: 14.71 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:59:28.66 -21:44:36.9: 14.21 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:52:31.54 -22:02:47.5: 13.81 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.14 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:59:28.66 -21:44:36.9: ref_mag=14.14 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.8694 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.89 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:50:09.00 -24:11:57.6: 14.18 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:54:30.71 -22:42:42.6: 13.95 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:52:31.54 -22:02:47.5: ref_mag=13.89 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.7466 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:12:22.24 -23:55:12.8: 13.72 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:54:30.71 -22:42:42.6: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.7612 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:07:23.46 -22:48:44.1: 14.08 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:07:23.46 -22:48:44.1: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.8384 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:51:57.71 -23:39:47.5: 13.93 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:07:06.51 -22:12:22.1: 14.03 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:58:35.01 -22:40:45.9: 13.93 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.06 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:07:06.51 -22:12:22.1: ref_mag=14.02 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.7664 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:58:35.01 -22:40:45.9: ref_mag=14.06 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.8243 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:12:22.24 -23:55:12.8: 13.93 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:50:09.00 -24:11:57.6: 14.34 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:12:22.24 -23:55:12.8: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.8483 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.25 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:50:09.00 -24:11:57.6: ref_mag=14.25 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.8122 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:51:57.71 -23:39:47.5: 14.01 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:51:57.71 -23:39:47.5: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.8202 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:53:28.22 -23:35:45.2: 13.80 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:51:27.11 -24:53:00.5: 13.70 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:16:19.17 -29:57:27.1: 13.96 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:57:32.42 -24:11:37.4: 13.96 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:59:16.93 -28:56:57.1: 13.89 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:23:43.99 -29:39:28.6: 13.86 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:16:49.25 -29:55:45.9: 12.88 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:51:27.11 -24:53:00.5: 13.76 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.73 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:51:27.11 -24:53:00.5: ref_mag=13.73 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.7527 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:53:28.22 -23:35:45.2: 14.11 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:16:19.17 -29:57:27.1: 14.26 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:53:28.22 -23:35:45.2: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.8122 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.08 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:16:19.17 -29:57:27.1: ref_mag=14.08 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.7410 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:57:32.42 -24:11:37.4: 13.92 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.94 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:57:32.42 -24:11:37.4: ref_mag=13.94 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.7524 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:59:16.93 -28:56:57.1: 13.93 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:59:16.93 -28:56:57.1: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.7824 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:23:43.99 -29:39:28.6: 14.02 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:23:43.99 -29:39:28.6: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.7082 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:16:49.25 -29:55:45.9: 12.95 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.92 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:16:49.25 -29:55:45.9: ref_mag=12.92 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.7879 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out61911.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 5s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55292_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 55292_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55295_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 55295_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55298_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 55298_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55302_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 55302_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55456_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 55456_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:17:00.67 -25:53:24.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57887_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 57887_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59364_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 59364_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61296_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 61296_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61326_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 61326_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61406_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 61406_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:03:48.58 -22:36:47.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61811_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 61811_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61851_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 61851_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61877_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 61877_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61885_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 61885_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61911_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 61911_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:14:28.99 -21:58:46.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.67, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.65)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.648 6853544602028236672 303.62102614911 -21.97918063485 11.9749 10.2517 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.648#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61916_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 61916_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61920_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 61920_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62040_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 62040_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62124_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 62124_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62212_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 62212_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62235_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 62235_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62242_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 62242_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62279_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 62279_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62336_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 62336_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62344_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 62344_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62417_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 62417_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62424_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 62424_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62437_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 62437_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62511_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 62511_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62650_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 62650_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62689_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 62689_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62701_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 62701_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62744_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 62744_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62788_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 62788_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62952_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 62952_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63058_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 63058_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63290_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 63290_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29005_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 29005_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:54:25.97 -25:06:11.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05374_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 05374_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39878_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249
The candidate 39878_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-16_01-06-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249 did not pass the final checks