This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060554_TTUQ1b1x1_494656_IDmnwl4k
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 15.4592 2461267.9592 10.34 06:57:45.16 +03:18:09.6
210.70936 2.90888 galactic Mon Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.7" and 9.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" AZ Mon
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
10.800 V 13.900 V 2452923.00000 388.900000000000 M6-M9III:eq
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:57:45.16 +03:18:09.6: 11.32 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:57:45.16 +03:18:09.6: 11.34 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.33 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
AZ Mon,2461267.9592,10.34,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
AZ Mon 20260815.4592 10.34CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 15.4592 2461267.9592 9.88 07:01:41.07 +04:04:24.2
210.46727 4.13273 galactic Mon Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 9.3 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" V0566 Mon
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.410 V Y 1.030 V 2452588.30000 120.000000000000 : M6.5
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 07:01:41.07 +04:04:24.2: 10.89 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 07:01:41.07 +04:04:24.2: 10.89 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.89 +/- 0.00
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V0566 Mon,2461267.9592,9.88,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V0566 Mon 20260815.4592 9.88CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 15.4592 2461267.9592 10.64 06:45:05.53 +09:02:16.9
204.16322 2.71093 galactic Mon Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 8.8 pix This object is listed in spacecraft.txt 324.6" XMM-NewtonThe object was found in VSX 2" FX Mon
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
10.200 V 16.500 V 2440275.00000 428.500000000000 M1-M8
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:45:05.53 +09:02:16.9: 12.43 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:45:05.53 +09:02:16.9: 12.43 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.43 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
FX Mon,2461267.9592,10.64,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
FX Mon 20260815.4592 10.64CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 15.4592 2461267.9592 12.43 06:49:10.40 +06:40:09.0
206.73531 2.53455 galactic Mon Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 8.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ZTF J064910.34+064009.4
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.819 r Y 0.565 r 2458430.86140 90.796498400000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:49:10.40 +06:40:09.0: 13.37 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:49:10.40 +06:40:09.0: 13.40 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.38 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ZTF J064910.34+064009.4,2461267.9592,12.43,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ZTF J064910.34+064009.4 20260815.4592 12.43CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 15.4592 2461267.9592 11.12 06:52:55.87 +07:36:02.1
206.32702 3.78767 galactic Mon Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 8.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" QQ Mon
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
10.900 V < 14.900 V 2454470.00000 244.000000000000 M6.5
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:52:55.87 +07:36:02.1: 13.25 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:52:55.87 +07:36:02.1: 13.27 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.26 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
QQ Mon,2461267.9592,11.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
QQ Mon 20260815.4592 11.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 15.4592 2461267.9592 13.18 06:39:50.26 +04:21:55.6
207.72507 -0.58380 galactic Mon Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 8.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" NSVS J0639503+042156
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.901 r Y 0.604 r 2458364.60640 415.476821000000 C
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:39:50.26 +04:21:55.6: 14.30 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:39:50.26 +04:21:55.6: 14.08 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.17 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0639503+042156,2461267.9592,13.18,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0639503+042156 20260815.4592 13.18CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 15.4592 2461267.9592 11.90 06:56:33.72 +02:39:33.2
211.14775 2.35156 galactic Mon Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.3" and 9.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" ASAS J065633+0239.5
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.530 V Y 0.640 V 2452594.90000 111.794749000000 M8
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:56:33.72 +02:39:33.2: 13.13 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:56:33.72 +02:39:33.2: 13.17 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.15 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J065633+0239.5,2461267.9592,11.90,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J065633+0239.5 20260815.4592 11.90CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 15.4592 2461267.9592 11.69 06:47:05.57 +08:00:55.6
205.30015 2.68672 galactic Mon Second-epoch detections are separated by 6.5" and 9.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 5" ST Mon
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
9.200 V 16.600 V 2435127.00000 399.400000000000 M5-M6.5
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:47:05.57 +08:00:55.6: 12.97 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:47:05.57 +08:00:55.6: 13.03 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.00 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ST Mon,2461267.9592,11.69,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ST Mon 20260815.4592 11.69CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 15.4592 2461267.9592 11.44 07:04:03.06 +02:33:22.1
212.09138 3.97051 galactic Mon Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 9.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASAS J070403+0233.4
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.470 V Y 1.330 V 2453713.00000 466.000000000000 C
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 07:04:03.06 +02:33:22.1: 12.90 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 07:04:03.06 +02:33:22.1: 12.98 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.94 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J070403+0233.4,2461267.9592,11.44,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J070403+0233.4 20260815.4592 11.44CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 15.4592 2461267.9592 11.86 06:26:53.04 +10:23:45.7
200.89328 -0.64878 galactic Mon Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 9.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 6" NSV 16862
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.300 : V < 16.200 V 2451433.00000 466.000000000000 M7.5III-M9
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:26:53.04 +10:23:45.7: 12.87 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:26:53.04 +10:23:45.7: 12.87 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.87 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSV 16862,2461267.9592,11.86,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSV 16862 20260815.4592 11.86CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 15.4592 2461267.9592 12.78 06:43:20.62 +02:08:50.9
210.09782 -0.82035 galactic Mon Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 9.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" NSVS J0643204+020852
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.970 r Y 0.433 r 2458202.61000 213.681783600000 M8
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:43:20.62 +02:08:50.9: 14.13 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:43:20.62 +02:08:50.9: 13.95 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.03 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0643204+020852,2461267.9592,12.78,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0643204+020852 20260815.4592 12.78CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 15.4592 2461267.9592 12.98 06:41:38.96 +05:21:18.0
207.05193 0.27047 galactic Mon Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 8.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" NSVS 12516626
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.076 r Y 0.639 r 2458534.26490 135.634228100000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:41:38.96 +05:21:18.0: 14.02 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:41:38.96 +05:21:18.0: 14.00 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.01 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS 12516626,2461267.9592,12.98,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS 12516626 20260815.4592 12.98CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 15.4592 2461267.9592 11.29 06:45:59.97 +04:41:13.5
208.14108 0.92902 galactic Mon Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 9.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASAS J064600+0441.2
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
8.403 Ic Y 0.214 Ic 2452718.90000 117.500000000000 M7
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:45:59.97 +04:41:13.5: 12.21 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:45:59.97 +04:41:13.5: 12.22 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.21 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J064600+0441.2,2461267.9592,11.29,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J064600+0441.2 20260815.4592 11.29CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 15.4592 2461267.9592 11.21 07:05:49.81 +04:30:48.1
210.54300 5.25345 galactic Mon Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 9.3 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASAS J070550+0430.8
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.600 V Y 0.290 V 2452614.40000 148.300000000000 M8
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 07:05:49.81 +04:30:48.1: 12.19 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 07:05:49.81 +04:30:48.1: 12.23 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.21 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J070550+0430.8,2461267.9592,11.21,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J070550+0430.8 20260815.4592 11.21CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 15.4592 2461267.9592 12.04 06:22:33.65 +01:27:42.2
208.32090 -5.74919 galactic Mon Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 9.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 5" ASAS J062233+0127.6
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.700 V < 17.100 V 2453028.00000 330.000000000000 M9:
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:22:33.65 +01:27:42.2: 14.52 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:22:33.65 +01:27:42.2: 14.53 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.52 +/- 0.09
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J062233+0127.6,2461267.9592,12.04,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J062233+0127.6 20260815.4592 12.04CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 15.4592 2461267.9592 12.52 07:03:38.46 +04:01:07.3
210.73786 4.54291 galactic Mon Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.6" and 8.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" NSVS J0703384+040109
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
15.264 g Y 1.502 g 2458441.01110 226.860142200000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 07:03:38.46 +04:01:07.3: 13.76 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 07:03:38.46 +04:01:07.3: 13.76 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0703384+040109,2461267.9592,12.52,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0703384+040109 20260815.4592 12.52CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 15.4592 2461267.9592 11.79 06:52:19.90 +01:44:49.9
211.47864 0.99538 galactic Mon Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 9.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" CI Mon
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.700 V < 14.500 V 2426045.00000 397.000000000000 M9
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:52:19.90 +01:44:49.9: 15.41 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:52:19.90 +01:44:49.9: 15.72 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.52 +/- 0.19
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
CI Mon,2461267.9592,11.79,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
CI Mon 20260815.4592 11.79CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 15.4592 2461267.9592 12.54 06:29:10.74 +04:23:18.3
206.48204 -2.93245 galactic Mon Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 8.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 5" NSVS J0629104+042317
Type: L:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
10.638 R1 Y 0.417 R1 169.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:29:10.74 +04:23:18.3: 13.53 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:29:10.74 +04:23:18.3: 13.52 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.53 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0629104+042317,2461267.9592,12.54,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0629104+042317 20260815.4592 12.54CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461082.63247990 11.02.2026 03:10:36.263 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits
First image: 2461082.63247990 11.02.2026 03:10:36.263 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits
Last image: 2461267.95964059 15.08.2026 11:01:42.947 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060554_TTUQ1b1x1_494656_IDmnwl4k/fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 8
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.85
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 7 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 30905
Objects passed selection criteria: 30757
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 21080
Average stars matched: 20422.2 (96.8797 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 254664 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Aug 15 06:08:17 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461082.63247990 11.02.2026 03:10:36.263 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits
First image: 2461082.63247990 11.02.2026 03:10:36.263 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits
Last image: 2461267.95964059 15.08.2026 11:01:42.947 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060554_TTUQ1b1x1_494656_IDmnwl4k/fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 222
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.53
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 77 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 211566
Objects passed selection criteria: 210976
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 154093
Average stars matched: 148352 (96.2748 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 668980 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Aug 15 06:10:46 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060554_TTUQ1b1x1_494656_IDmnwl4k/fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-00-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060554_TTUQ1b1x1_494656_IDmnwl4k/fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060554_TTUQ1b1x1_494656_IDmnwl4k/fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-00-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060554_TTUQ1b1x1_494656_IDmnwl4k/fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461267.95881995
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-00-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:51:20.491 +05:59:15.99 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-00-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-00-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits
Image size: 945.1'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:51:36.433 +05:58:00.23 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:51:20.491 +05:59:15.99
Second-epoch image center 06:51:36.433 +05:58:00.23
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0693 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
Image size: 944.9'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:51:33.624 +05:58:34.10 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:51:20.491 +05:59:15.99
Second-epoch image center 06:51:33.624 +05:58:34.10
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0557 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 06:51:36.433 +05:58:00.23
Second-epoch second image center 06:51:33.624 +05:58:34.10
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01497 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits &> /tmp/tmp.EWfBfBmlqL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits &> /tmp/tmp.I1bjtePx6F
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060554_TTUQ1b1x1_494656_IDmnwl4k/fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-00-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Iukep62CQo
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060554_TTUQ1b1x1_494656_IDmnwl4k/fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-00-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060554_TTUQ1b1x1_494656_IDmnwl4k/fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SqxyPNF51x
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060554_TTUQ1b1x1_494656_IDmnwl4k/fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits and wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits and wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits and wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits) and catalog (wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 32961 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 94.7452 to 110.7708 deg, Dec +0.5814 to +11.3123 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 94.7452 to 110.7708 deg, Dec 0.5814 to 11.3123 deg
Loaded 21773 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 15914 out of 17914 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 17914 out of 32961 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.900400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.900400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.85
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.05
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.05
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 32961 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 94.7452 to 110.7708 deg, Dec +0.5814 to +11.3123 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 94.7452 to 110.7708 deg, Dec 0.5814 to 11.3123 deg
Loaded 21773 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 15914 out of 17914 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 17914 out of 32961 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 33181 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 94.7699 to 110.7820 deg, Dec +0.5785 to +11.3189 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 94.7699 to 110.7820 deg, Dec 0.5785 to 11.3189 deg
Loaded 21790 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 15930 out of 17931 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 17931 out of 33181 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 8 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits
2.2 pix Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
2.4 pix fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-00-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits
2.4 pix fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits
15.0 mag. Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
13.6 mag. fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-00-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits
13.5 mag. fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.5 (SNR ) 10.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.EWfBfBmlqL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060554_TTUQ1b1x1_494656_IDmnwl4k/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits' -> 'wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3983, bad_region=0, passed=32961
Got 32961 stars (including 28949 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 32961 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4889 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4825 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4825 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4825 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4889 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4822 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4822 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4822 stars left (next iteration limit 5307)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits N_match=4822 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.492 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.517 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.489 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.500 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.440 n_q1=1130 n_q2=1265 n_q3=1194 n_q4=1233 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.051
The image catalog is written to wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits -region wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.I1bjtePx6F (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060554_TTUQ1b1x1_494656_IDmnwl4k/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits' -> 'wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=4007, bad_region=0, passed=33181
Got 33181 stars (including 29126 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33181 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4891 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4824 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4825 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4824 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33181 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4890 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4825 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33181 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4825 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33181 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4825 stars left (next iteration limit 5306)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits N_match=4825 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.471 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.505 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.456 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.515 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.435 n_q1=1140 n_q2=1262 n_q3=1192 n_q4=1231 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.093
The image catalog is written to wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits -region wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Iukep62CQo (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060554_TTUQ1b1x1_494656_IDmnwl4k/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060554_TTUQ1b1x1_494656_IDmnwl4k/fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-00-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060554_TTUQ1b1x1_494656_IDmnwl4k/fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-00-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060554_TTUQ1b1x1_494656_IDmnwl4k/fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-00-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060554_TTUQ1b1x1_494656_IDmnwl4k/fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-00-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060554_TTUQ1b1x1_494656_IDmnwl4k/fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-00-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060554_TTUQ1b1x1_494656_IDmnwl4k/fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-00-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-00-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-00-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-00-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-00-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-00-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-00-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-00-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060554_TTUQ1b1x1_494656_IDmnwl4k/fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-00-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-00-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=557, bad_region=0, passed=9453
Got 9453 stars (including 8889 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-00-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9453 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013126 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010501 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4869 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4764 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4769 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4764 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9452 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4871 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4767 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9452 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4767 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9452 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 4767 stars left (next iteration limit 5240)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4767 robust_rms=7.433 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.659 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4767 robust_rms=0.550 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.772 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4767 robust_rms=0.436 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.596 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4767 robust_rms_before=1.384 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.485 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.436 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.619 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.596
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.619 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-00-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits N_match=4767 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.499 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.463 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.633 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.464 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.496 n_q1=1367 n_q2=854 n_q3=1485 n_q4=1061 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.268
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-00-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-00-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060554_TTUQ1b1x1_494656_IDmnwl4k/fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-00-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits -region wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-00-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-00-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.SqxyPNF51x (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060554_TTUQ1b1x1_494656_IDmnwl4k/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060554_TTUQ1b1x1_494656_IDmnwl4k/fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060554_TTUQ1b1x1_494656_IDmnwl4k/fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060554_TTUQ1b1x1_494656_IDmnwl4k/fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060554_TTUQ1b1x1_494656_IDmnwl4k/fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060554_TTUQ1b1x1_494656_IDmnwl4k/fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060554_TTUQ1b1x1_494656_IDmnwl4k/fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060554_TTUQ1b1x1_494656_IDmnwl4k/fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=566, bad_region=0, passed=9220
Got 9220 stars (including 8640 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9220 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013124 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010499 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4871 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4761 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4765 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4761 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9219 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4871 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4765 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9219 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4765 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9219 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 4765 stars left (next iteration limit 5237)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4765 robust_rms=7.673 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.379 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4765 robust_rms=0.529 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.750 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4765 robust_rms=0.428 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.571 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4765 robust_rms_before=1.377 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.499 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.428 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.613 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.571
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.613 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits N_match=4765 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.501 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.457 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.601 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.485 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.514 n_q1=1358 n_q2=861 n_q3=1475 n_q4=1071 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.200
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060554_TTUQ1b1x1_494656_IDmnwl4k/fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits -region wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-00-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-00-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-00-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits sigma_overall=0.492 worst_q_ratio=1.051
ref2=Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits sigma_overall=0.471 worst_q_ratio=1.093
new1=fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-00-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits sigma_overall=0.499 worst_q_ratio=1.268
new2=fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits sigma_overall=0.501 worst_q_ratio=1.200
reference average sigma_overall=0.4815 worst_q_ratio=1.072
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054_astrometric_residuals.png (4822 matched stars from wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.44 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055_astrometric_residuals.png (4825 matched stars from wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.44 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-00-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464_astrometric_residuals.png (4767 matched stars from wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-00-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.47 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465_astrometric_residuals.png (4765 matched stars from wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.47 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-00-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-00-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060554_TTUQ1b1x1_494656_IDmnwl4k/wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-00-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060554_TTUQ1b1x1_494656_IDmnwl4k/wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Mon-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:45:05.53 +09:02:16.9: 12.43 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 07:01:41.07 +04:04:24.2: 10.89 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:57:45.16 +03:18:09.6: 11.32 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:57:45.16 +03:18:09.6: 11.34 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:45:05.53 +09:02:16.9: 12.43 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 07:01:41.07 +04:04:24.2: 10.89 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.43 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.33 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.89 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:45:05.53 +09:02:16.9: ref_mag=12.43 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.6402 delta=1.79 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:57:45.16 +03:18:09.6: ref_mag=11.33 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.3346 delta=1.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:01:41.07 +04:04:24.2: ref_mag=10.89 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.8741 delta=1.02 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out08167.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out10287.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out26218.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 5s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52459_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 52459_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:08.57 +10:45:42.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52468_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 52468_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:18:48.57 +02:43:22.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52486_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 52486_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:48:15.75 +08:02:40.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 00999_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 00999_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:31.36 +01:05:42.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08167_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
Preparing report for the candidate 08167_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10287_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
Preparing report for the candidate 10287_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26218_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
Preparing report for the candidate 26218_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31132_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 31132_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:42.58 +10:01:26.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 8s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Mon-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
06:57:45.16 +03:18:09.6
07:01:41.07 +04:04:24.2
06:45:05.53 +09:02:16.9
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060554_TTUQ1b1x1_494656_IDmnwl4k/fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-00-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060554_TTUQ1b1x1_494656_IDmnwl4k/fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060554_TTUQ1b1x1_494656_IDmnwl4k/fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-00-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060554_TTUQ1b1x1_494656_IDmnwl4k/fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-00-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-00-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:51:20.491 +05:59:15.99 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-00-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-00-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits
Image size: 945.1'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:51:36.433 +05:58:00.23 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:51:20.491 +05:59:15.99
Second-epoch image center 06:51:36.433 +05:58:00.23
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0693 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
Image size: 944.9'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:51:33.624 +05:58:34.10 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:51:20.491 +05:59:15.99
Second-epoch image center 06:51:33.624 +05:58:34.10
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0557 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 06:51:36.433 +05:58:00.23
Second-epoch second image center 06:51:33.624 +05:58:34.10
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01497 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xIuLPpGnR9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9mwHz5lvee
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060554_TTUQ1b1x1_494656_IDmnwl4k/fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-00-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits &> /tmp/tmp.HY86mVyM0S
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060554_TTUQ1b1x1_494656_IDmnwl4k/fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-00-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060554_TTUQ1b1x1_494656_IDmnwl4k/fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ya3oFCgZvA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060554_TTUQ1b1x1_494656_IDmnwl4k/fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits and wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits and wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits and wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits) and catalog (wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 231384 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 94.7452 to 110.7733 deg, Dec +0.5711 to +11.3153 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 94.7452 to 110.7733 deg, Dec 0.5711 to 11.3153 deg
Loaded 21806 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11920 out of 19090 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 19090 out of 231384 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.752400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.752400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.53
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.22
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.22
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 231384 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 94.7452 to 110.7733 deg, Dec +0.5711 to +11.3153 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 94.7452 to 110.7733 deg, Dec 0.5711 to 11.3153 deg
Loaded 21806 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11920 out of 19090 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 19090 out of 231384 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits (aperture=4.8)
Read 230229 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 94.7621 to 110.7855 deg, Dec +0.5785 to +11.3194 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 94.7621 to 110.7855 deg, Dec 0.5785 to 11.3194 deg
Loaded 21805 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11969 out of 19080 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 19080 out of 230229 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits (aperture=4.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 216 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits
2.1 pix Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
2.4 pix fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-00-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits
2.4 pix fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits
15.2 mag. Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
13.7 mag. fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-00-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits
13.6 mag. fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.6 (SNR ) 13.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.xIuLPpGnR9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060554_TTUQ1b1x1_494656_IDmnwl4k/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits' -> 'wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=91, blended=40564, bad_region=0, passed=231293
Got 231293 stars (including 190414 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 231293 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4858 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4809 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4809 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4809 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 231293 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4858 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4808 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 231293 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4808 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 231293 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4808 stars left (next iteration limit 5289)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits N_match=4808 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.447 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.453 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.457 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.443 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.410 n_q1=1116 n_q2=1273 n_q3=1198 n_q4=1221 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.022
The image catalog is written to wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits -region wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.9mwHz5lvee (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060554_TTUQ1b1x1_494656_IDmnwl4k/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits' -> 'wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=74, blended=40389, bad_region=3, passed=230155
Got 230155 stars (including 189369 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 230155 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4863 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4813 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4813 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4813 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 230155 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4862 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4812 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 230155 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4812 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 230155 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 4812 stars left (next iteration limit 5294)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits N_match=4812 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.433 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.449 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.449 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.376 n_q1=1133 n_q2=1273 n_q3=1180 n_q4=1226 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.048
The image catalog is written to wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits -region wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.HY86mVyM0S (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060554_TTUQ1b1x1_494656_IDmnwl4k/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060554_TTUQ1b1x1_494656_IDmnwl4k/fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-00-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060554_TTUQ1b1x1_494656_IDmnwl4k/fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-00-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060554_TTUQ1b1x1_494656_IDmnwl4k/fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-00-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060554_TTUQ1b1x1_494656_IDmnwl4k/fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-00-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060554_TTUQ1b1x1_494656_IDmnwl4k/fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-00-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060554_TTUQ1b1x1_494656_IDmnwl4k/fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-00-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-00-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-00-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-00-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-00-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-00-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-00-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-00-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060554_TTUQ1b1x1_494656_IDmnwl4k/fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-00-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-00-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=4582, bad_region=2, passed=80120
Got 80120 stars (including 75413 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-00-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 80120 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013126 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010501 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.2 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4865 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4778 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4785 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4778 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 80109 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.2 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4868 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4781 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 80109 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4780 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 80109 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 4780 stars left (next iteration limit 5255)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-00-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4780 robust_rms=7.520 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.780 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4780 robust_rms=0.544 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.734 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4780 robust_rms=0.435 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.593 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4780 robust_rms_before=1.404 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.472 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.435 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.574 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.593
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.574 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-00-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits N_match=4780 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.478 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.427 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.612 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.457 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.467 n_q1=1381 n_q2=849 n_q3=1494 n_q4=1056 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.281
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-00-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-00-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060554_TTUQ1b1x1_494656_IDmnwl4k/fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-00-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits -region wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-00-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-00-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ya3oFCgZvA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060554_TTUQ1b1x1_494656_IDmnwl4k/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060554_TTUQ1b1x1_494656_IDmnwl4k/fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060554_TTUQ1b1x1_494656_IDmnwl4k/fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060554_TTUQ1b1x1_494656_IDmnwl4k/fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060554_TTUQ1b1x1_494656_IDmnwl4k/fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060554_TTUQ1b1x1_494656_IDmnwl4k/fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060554_TTUQ1b1x1_494656_IDmnwl4k/fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060554_TTUQ1b1x1_494656_IDmnwl4k/fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=4499, bad_region=2, passed=78253
Got 78253 stars (including 73650 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 78253 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013124 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010499 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4869 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4781 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4786 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4781 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 78248 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4869 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4783 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 78248 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4783 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 78248 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 4783 stars left (next iteration limit 5259)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4783 robust_rms=7.654 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.701 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4783 robust_rms=0.534 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.726 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4783 robust_rms=0.427 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.568 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4783 robust_rms_before=1.378 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.475 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.427 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.580 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.568
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.580 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits N_match=4783 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.475 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.422 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.568 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.452 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.493 n_q1=1384 n_q2=864 n_q3=1462 n_q4=1073 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.197
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060554_TTUQ1b1x1_494656_IDmnwl4k/fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits -region wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-00-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060554_TTUQ1b1x1_494656_IDmnwl4k/wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-00-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_060554_TTUQ1b1x1_494656_IDmnwl4k/wcs_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Mon-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:39:19.09 +06:31:23.8: 13.46 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:48:50.93 +02:27:44.8: 13.42 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:51:35.10 +09:14:38.1: 13.61 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:41:55.47 +08:25:32.2: 13.14 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:54:53.45 +03:15:46.6: 13.02 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:34:44.56 +08:21:16.8: 13.48 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:34:36.92 +05:22:51.3: 13.14 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 07:04:49.29 +04:51:12.4: 12.55 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:39:19.09 +06:31:23.8: 13.53 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:41:55.47 +08:25:32.2: 13.05 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:48:50.93 +02:27:44.8: 13.39 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:51:35.10 +09:14:38.1: 13.66 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.49 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.09 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.63 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:39:19.09 +06:31:23.8: ref_mag=13.49 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7059 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:41:55.47 +08:25:32.2: ref_mag=13.09 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2614 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:48:50.93 +02:27:44.8: ref_mag=13.40 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1885 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:51:35.10 +09:14:38.1: ref_mag=13.63 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5113 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:34:36.92 +05:22:51.3: 13.20 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.17 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 07:04:49.29 +04:51:12.4: 12.52 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:54:53.45 +03:15:46.6: 13.13 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:34:36.92 +05:22:51.3: ref_mag=13.17 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1008 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:34:44.56 +08:21:16.8: 13.40 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.54 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.07 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:04:49.29 +04:51:12.4: ref_mag=12.54 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6219 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.43 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:54:53.45 +03:15:46.6: ref_mag=13.07 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8089 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:34:44.56 +08:21:16.8: ref_mag=13.43 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3214 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:35:55.22 +05:47:37.2: 13.00 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 07:08:38.44 +07:09:20.4: 12.48 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 07:03:09.52 +07:40:34.2: 12.54 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 07:11:01.40 +01:20:41.9: 11.57 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:44:02.05 +03:50:56.5: 12.55 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:35:55.22 +05:47:37.2: 13.04 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.02 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:35:55.22 +05:47:37.2: ref_mag=13.02 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0677 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 07:08:38.44 +07:09:20.4: 12.50 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.49 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:08:38.44 +07:09:20.4: ref_mag=12.49 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5387 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:44:02.05 +03:50:56.5: 12.56 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 07:11:01.40 +01:20:41.9: 11.54 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 07:03:09.52 +07:40:34.2: 12.58 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.56 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.56 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:44:02.05 +03:50:56.5: ref_mag=12.56 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6002 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:11:01.40 +01:20:41.9: ref_mag=11.56 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9051 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.56 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:03:09.52 +07:40:34.2: ref_mag=12.56 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6459 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:27:22.87 +09:12:13.9: 12.94 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 07:08:53.75 +05:16:19.0: 11.82 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:27:22.87 +09:12:13.9: 12.96 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.95 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:45:06.04 +07:08:18.4: 12.13 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:41:29.20 +04:37:32.3: 12.41 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:27:22.87 +09:12:13.9: ref_mag=12.95 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9156 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:21:51.50 +10:51:11.3: 11.84 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:45:06.04 +07:08:18.4: 12.12 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 07:08:53.75 +05:16:19.0: 11.82 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:41:29.20 +04:37:32.3: 12.39 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.13 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.82 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:45:06.04 +07:08:18.4: ref_mag=12.13 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2182 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.40 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:08:53.75 +05:16:19.0: ref_mag=11.82 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9234 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:41:29.20 +04:37:32.3: ref_mag=12.40 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3804 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:21:51.50 +10:51:11.3: 11.81 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.82 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:21:51.50 +10:51:11.3: ref_mag=11.82 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5502 delta=-0.73 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:35:20.99 +05:11:06.3: 15.62 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:47:13.40 +01:33:01.3: 11.95 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:48:56.08 +05:34:42.5: 12.34 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:48:26.44 +05:31:21.4: 12.40 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:35:20.99 +05:11:06.3: 15.15 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.28 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:35:20.99 +05:11:06.3: ref_mag=15.28 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=12.2622 delta=3.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:31:42.67 +06:46:20.6: 12.60 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:47:13.40 +01:33:01.3: 11.94 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.95 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:47:13.40 +01:33:01.3: ref_mag=11.95 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0792 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:32:24.86 +03:29:25.0: 12.59 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:54:31.49 +10:41:28.3: 12.92 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:48:56.08 +05:34:42.5: 12.31 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.33 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:48:56.08 +05:34:42.5: ref_mag=12.33 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2172 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:48:26.44 +05:31:21.4: 12.39 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.39 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:48:26.44 +05:31:21.4: ref_mag=12.39 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2716 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:31:42.67 +06:46:20.6: 12.60 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.60 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:31:42.67 +06:46:20.6: ref_mag=12.60 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5363 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:32:24.86 +03:29:25.0: 12.61 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.60 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:32:24.86 +03:29:25.0: ref_mag=12.60 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5209 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:54:31.49 +10:41:28.3: 12.86 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.89 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:54:31.49 +10:41:28.3: ref_mag=12.89 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4113 delta=0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:28:27.11 +04:23:53.2: 12.54 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:28:27.11 +04:23:53.2: 12.55 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.55 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:28:27.11 +04:23:53.2: ref_mag=12.55 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6882 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:45:12.22 +09:41:55.3: 12.74 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:47:48.84 +02:56:27.1: 12.34 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:45:12.22 +09:41:55.3: 12.67 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:56:28.64 +06:00:57.9: 12.72 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:47:16.01 +02:25:02.5: 12.69 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.70 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:45:12.22 +09:41:55.3: ref_mag=12.70 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6181 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:44:57.48 +04:15:23.0: 12.49 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:47:48.84 +02:56:27.1: 12.35 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.34 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:47:48.84 +02:56:27.1: ref_mag=12.34 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5297 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:56:28.64 +06:00:57.9: 12.72 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.72 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:56:28.64 +06:00:57.9: ref_mag=12.72 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4197 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:47:16.01 +02:25:02.5: 12.66 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:44:57.48 +04:15:23.0: 12.51 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.67 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.50 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:47:16.01 +02:25:02.5: ref_mag=12.67 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5046 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:44:57.48 +04:15:23.0: ref_mag=12.50 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5815 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:52:44.09 +06:30:24.0: 12.69 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:55:56.89 +05:06:41.8: 12.35 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:52:44.09 +06:30:24.0: 12.63 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.66 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:52:44.09 +06:30:24.0: ref_mag=12.66 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5814 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:48:46.97 +08:47:58.7: 12.77 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:52:43.84 +08:25:19.0: 11.47 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:55:56.89 +05:06:41.8: 12.34 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.34 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:55:56.89 +05:06:41.8: ref_mag=12.34 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5129 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:48:46.97 +08:47:58.7: 12.78 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.77 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:48:46.97 +08:47:58.7: ref_mag=12.77 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7878 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:52:43.84 +08:25:19.0: 11.46 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.47 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:52:43.84 +08:25:19.0: ref_mag=11.47 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5122 delta=-1.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:47:52.93 +08:01:50.6: 13.04 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:49:35.05 +03:11:34.3: 12.70 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:47:52.93 +08:01:50.6: 13.07 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.05 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:47:52.93 +08:01:50.6: ref_mag=13.05 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8392 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:39:31.59 +08:20:23.7: 13.04 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:49:35.05 +03:11:34.3: 12.67 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.69 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:49:35.05 +03:11:34.3: ref_mag=12.69 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6864 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 07:07:31.10 +04:59:19.0: 11.49 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:51:43.61 +11:04:57.6: 12.97 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:55:13.33 +05:55:03.0: 12.73 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:41:37.80 +04:57:43.2: 12.99 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:39:31.59 +08:20:23.7: 13.04 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.04 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:39:31.59 +08:20:23.7: ref_mag=13.04 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0328 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 07:07:31.10 +04:59:19.0: 11.47 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.48 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:07:31.10 +04:59:19.0: ref_mag=11.48 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5554 delta=-1.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:51:43.61 +11:04:57.6: 12.97 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:52:47.35 +08:26:48.6: 12.79 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:55:13.33 +05:55:03.0: 12.77 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.97 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:41:37.80 +04:57:43.2: 13.00 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:51:43.61 +11:04:57.6: ref_mag=12.97 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8173 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.75 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:55:13.33 +05:55:03.0: ref_mag=12.75 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7663 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.99 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:41:37.80 +04:57:43.2: ref_mag=12.99 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8782 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:52:47.35 +08:26:48.6: 12.73 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.76 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:52:47.35 +08:26:48.6: ref_mag=12.76 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8544 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:41:33.06 +06:07:15.0: 12.96 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:41:39.24 +04:57:36.4: 13.09 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 07:02:18.37 +07:01:56.5: 12.96 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:25:54.11 +03:14:57.5: 13.39 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:59:48.30 +06:17:53.6: 12.75 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:41:39.24 +04:57:36.4: 13.02 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.06 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:41:39.24 +04:57:36.4: ref_mag=13.06 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0332 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:41:33.06 +06:07:15.0: 12.99 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 07:02:18.37 +07:01:56.5: 12.90 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.97 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:54:03.60 +06:42:38.4: 13.34 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:41:33.06 +06:07:15.0: ref_mag=12.97 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9797 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.93 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:02:18.37 +07:01:56.5: ref_mag=12.93 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8682 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:54:33.68 +04:29:39.4: 13.59 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:25:54.11 +03:14:57.5: 13.41 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:59:48.30 +06:17:53.6: 12.82 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:25:54.11 +03:14:57.5: ref_mag=13.40 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2267 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.78 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:59:48.30 +06:17:53.6: ref_mag=12.78 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7463 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:54:03.60 +06:42:38.4: 13.28 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.31 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:54:03.60 +06:42:38.4: ref_mag=13.31 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0431 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:48:28.99 +06:14:33.3: 13.61 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:54:33.68 +04:29:39.4: 13.50 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:54:33.68 +04:29:39.4: ref_mag=13.54 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.0853 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:49:49.99 +06:56:55.4: 13.57 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:48:28.99 +06:14:33.3: 13.51 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.55 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:48:28.99 +06:14:33.3: ref_mag=13.55 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3189 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:49:49.99 +06:56:55.4: 13.62 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.59 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:49:49.99 +06:56:55.4: ref_mag=13.59 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2920 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:52:02.70 +08:49:00.8: 13.35 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:49:10.40 +06:40:09.0: 13.37 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:37:37.06 +04:35:33.7: 11.68 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:52:02.70 +08:49:00.8: 13.38 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:46:24.70 +04:22:49.3: 13.21 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.36 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:52:02.70 +08:49:00.8: ref_mag=13.36 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4415 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:53:55.51 +05:16:33.4: 13.30 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:49:10.40 +06:40:09.0: 13.40 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:37:37.06 +04:35:33.7: 11.67 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.38 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:46:24.70 +04:22:49.3: 13.13 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.68 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:49:10.40 +06:40:09.0: ref_mag=13.38 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4297 delta=0.96 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:37:37.06 +04:35:33.7: ref_mag=11.68 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.7795 delta=0.90 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.17 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:46:24.70 +04:22:49.3: ref_mag=13.17 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.2853 delta=0.88 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:53:55.51 +05:16:33.4: 13.22 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.26 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:53:55.51 +05:16:33.4: ref_mag=13.26 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3641 delta=0.89 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:55:06.10 +01:36:14.9: 13.40 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:52:55.87 +07:36:02.1: 13.25 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:55:06.10 +01:36:14.9: 13.29 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.34 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:39:50.26 +04:21:55.6: 14.30 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:55:06.10 +01:36:14.9: ref_mag=13.34 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9585 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:52:55.87 +07:36:02.1: 13.27 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.26 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:47:05.57 +08:00:55.6: 12.97 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:52:55.87 +07:36:02.1: ref_mag=13.26 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.1138 delta=2.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:56:33.72 +02:39:33.2: 13.13 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:39:50.26 +04:21:55.6: 14.08 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.17 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:39:50.26 +04:21:55.6: ref_mag=14.17 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.1652 delta=1.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 07:04:03.06 +02:33:22.1: 12.90 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:47:05.57 +08:00:55.6: 13.03 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:26:53.04 +10:23:45.7: 12.87 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:56:33.72 +02:39:33.2: 13.17 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.00 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:47:05.57 +08:00:55.6: ref_mag=13.00 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.6797 delta=1.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.15 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:56:33.72 +02:39:33.2: ref_mag=13.15 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.8918 delta=1.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:43:20.62 +02:08:50.9: 14.13 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 07:04:03.06 +02:33:22.1: 12.98 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.94 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:04:03.06 +02:33:22.1: ref_mag=12.94 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.4394 delta=1.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:26:53.04 +10:23:45.7: 12.87 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.87 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:26:53.04 +10:23:45.7: ref_mag=12.87 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.8633 delta=1.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:43:20.62 +02:08:50.9: 13.95 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.03 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:43:20.62 +02:08:50.9: ref_mag=14.03 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.7786 delta=1.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:41:38.96 +05:21:18.0: 14.02 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:41:38.96 +05:21:18.0: 14.00 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.01 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:41:38.96 +05:21:18.0: ref_mag=14.01 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.9869 delta=1.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:45:59.97 +04:41:13.5: 12.21 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:45:59.97 +04:41:13.5: 12.22 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.21 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:45:59.97 +04:41:13.5: ref_mag=12.21 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.2800 delta=0.93 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 07:05:49.81 +04:30:48.1: 12.19 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 07:05:49.81 +04:30:48.1: 12.23 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.21 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:05:49.81 +04:30:48.1: ref_mag=12.21 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.2081 delta=1.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:22:33.65 +01:27:42.2: 14.52 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:22:33.65 +01:27:42.2: 14.53 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.52 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:22:33.65 +01:27:42.2: ref_mag=14.52 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=12.0300 delta=2.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 07:03:38.46 +04:01:07.3: 13.76 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 07:03:38.46 +04:01:07.3: 13.76 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:03:38.46 +04:01:07.3: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.5141 delta=1.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:52:19.90 +01:44:49.9: 15.41 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-10-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0054.fits at 06:29:10.74 +04:23:18.3: 13.53 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:52:19.90 +01:44:49.9: 15.72 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.52 +/- 0.19
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:52:19.90 +01:44:49.9: ref_mag=15.52 +/- 0.19 new_mean_mag=11.7903 delta=3.73 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-11-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 06:29:10.74 +04:23:18.3: 13.52 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.53 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:29:10.74 +04:23:18.3: ref_mag=13.53 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.5311 delta=1.00 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out262062.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out127250.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out150359.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out161486.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out18338.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out213695.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out21589.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out30620.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out37326.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out40196.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out65952.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out74727.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out76119.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out76765.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out81305.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out96041.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 16s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 7s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261175_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 261175_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261177_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 261177_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261178_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 261178_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:36:49.20 +04:10:28.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261193_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 261193_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261195_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 261195_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:37:53.03 +06:42:23.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261203_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 261203_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:51.13 +07:00:49.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261204_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 261204_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:41.84 +08:52:55.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261216_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 261216_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261218_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 261218_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:52:22.12 +06:13:34.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261222_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 261222_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:06.38 +07:46:21.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261228_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 261228_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:18.35 +06:00:34.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261229_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 261229_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:20:57.49 +07:51:26.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261230_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 261230_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261232_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 261232_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261233_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 261233_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261240_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 261240_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261244_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 261244_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:32:54.66 +05:47:55.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261247_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 261247_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:40:19.71 +06:17:07.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261248_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 261248_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261250_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 261250_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261252_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 261252_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261258_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 261258_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261262_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 261262_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:31.46 +00:58:15.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261265_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 261265_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261269_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 261269_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:29.46 +02:56:49.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261270_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 261270_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:27.02 +08:19:36.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261271_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 261271_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:54:48.04 +08:20:39.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261272_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 261272_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:25:37.70 +06:25:01.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261276_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 261276_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:24.67 +07:23:50.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261277_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 261277_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261279_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 261279_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:37:36.15 +08:27:08.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261281_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 261281_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:18:04.13 +08:32:33.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261283_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 261283_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:36.39 +07:14:17.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261284_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 261284_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:36:09.10 +07:51:19.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261286_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 261286_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:15.23 +06:48:44.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261288_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 261288_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:22:47.25 +09:36:16.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261290_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 261290_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261291_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 261291_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261292_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 261292_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261293_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 261293_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:20.38 +03:10:27.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261298_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 261298_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:24.62 +09:22:21.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261299_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 261299_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261303_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 261303_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:40:48.42 +08:53:20.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261304_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 261304_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:32:16.50 +08:09:58.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261306_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 261306_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:31:50.27 +08:10:36.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261307_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 261307_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:17.07 +01:29:54.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261308_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 261308_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:17.15 +01:47:29.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261518_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 261518_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:31:58.89 +04:56:16.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261575_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 261575_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:07.75 +00:50:22.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261622_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 261622_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:51.33 +03:26:41.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261659_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 261659_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:23:53.73 +04:36:13.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261662_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 261662_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:32.75 +00:47:24.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261775_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 261775_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:34:43.49 +04:58:37.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261776_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 261776_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:03.80 +02:21:07.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261813_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 261813_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:48:32.15 +01:51:48.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261829_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 261829_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:38:35.37 +08:59:41.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261944_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 261944_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:25:11.36 +10:40:33.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261979_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 261979_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:52:47.31 +08:27:29.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262021_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 262021_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:55.39 +07:27:51.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262045_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 262045_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:32:18.74 +04:52:46.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262062_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 262062_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:35:20.99 +05:11:06.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.26, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.24)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.092 3131726844707957760 098.83715798429 +05.18513443101 12.3940 10.5042 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.092#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262077_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 262077_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:42.15 +00:49:40.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262095_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 262095_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:21:54.70 +02:22:35.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262122_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 262122_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262151_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 262151_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:21:53.74 +02:20:42.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262160_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 262160_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:23:13.00 +03:46:08.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262163_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 262163_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:41:04.39 +09:51:50.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262184_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 262184_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:09.02 +05:58:55.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262191_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 262191_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262195_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 262195_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262207_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 262207_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:33:06.41 +01:14:43.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262253_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 262253_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262259_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 262259_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262268_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 262268_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262292_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 262292_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:14.25 +10:19:30.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262328_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 262328_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:21:05.15 +07:33:14.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262333_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 262333_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:48:29.01 +05:32:05.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262344_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 262344_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262347_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 262347_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:23:43.08 +02:39:19.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262382_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 262382_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:25:59.54 +04:24:08.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262391_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 262391_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:38:44.34 +04:42:51.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262399_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 262399_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:54:06.12 +06:39:05.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262403_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 262403_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:25:17.32 +07:59:44.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262422_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 262422_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:36:30.09 +06:05:45.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262427_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 262427_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:41:44.33 +07:03:50.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262436_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 262436_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:06.49 +07:17:18.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262451_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 262451_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:46:28.49 +09:11:01.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262459_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 262459_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:51.12 +04:25:50.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262465_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 262465_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:44:18.64 +07:26:25.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262471_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 262471_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:36:50.27 +10:37:33.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262487_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 262487_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262502_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 262502_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:44:32.20 +03:08:57.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262507_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 262507_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:46:58.03 +08:04:20.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262526_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 262526_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:54:35.37 +06:43:04.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262530_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 262530_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262537_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 262537_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:14.09 +08:04:15.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262552_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 262552_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:48:22.73 +06:14:24.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262563_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 262563_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:21:45.67 +02:21:46.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262564_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 262564_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262580_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 262580_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:34:45.13 +07:35:35.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262581_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 262581_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262585_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 262585_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262590_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 262590_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:38:47.60 +06:52:44.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262596_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 262596_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:03.98 +05:36:34.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262614_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 262614_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:32:59.53 +07:21:13.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262615_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 262615_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:39:17.55 +07:16:14.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262617_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 262617_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:41:02.59 +05:21:29.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262627_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 262627_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:01.57 +10:10:46.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262632_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 262632_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:23:58.81 +08:54:25.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262662_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 262662_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262668_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 262668_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:33:47.87 +07:13:13.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262671_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 262671_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:32:47.36 +03:48:08.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262686_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 262686_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262689_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 262689_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:30:06.02 +09:00:20.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262708_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 262708_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:32:42.63 +03:05:38.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262709_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 262709_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:51.70 +09:15:49.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262713_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 262713_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:39.11 +04:26:52.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262721_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 262721_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262775_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 262775_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262792_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 262792_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:50:01.34 +06:14:57.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262801_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 262801_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:33:00.26 +07:21:36.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262822_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 262822_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:48.20 +10:42:37.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262834_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 262834_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:38:46.43 +06:47:52.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262835_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 262835_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:32:22.58 +04:52:29.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262844_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 262844_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:42:33.05 +10:50:01.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262848_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 262848_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:17.44 +09:00:59.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262856_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 262856_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:25:19.12 +08:01:36.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262871_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 262871_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262875_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 262875_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:29:17.66 +10:55:15.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262878_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 262878_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262893_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 262893_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:29.21 +09:26:11.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262898_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 262898_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:34:06.46 +05:24:16.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262925_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 262925_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:20:48.73 +04:56:10.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262929_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 262929_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:40:47.05 +09:46:07.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262943_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 262943_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:27:16.39 +09:13:11.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262945_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 262945_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262947_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 262947_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262961_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 262961_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:32:58.13 +05:07:50.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262977_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 262977_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262987_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 262987_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:48.42 +07:51:27.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263001_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 263001_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263041_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 263041_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263043_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 263043_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:42.02 +03:01:16.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263045_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 263045_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:27:14.71 +10:18:44.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263106_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 263106_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263137_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 263137_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:32.75 +08:27:54.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263162_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 263162_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:54:16.75 +05:09:34.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263186_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 263186_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:46:49.79 +07:54:15.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263189_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 263189_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:58.99 +06:34:02.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263203_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 263203_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:41:59.28 +02:35:42.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263208_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 263208_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:53.89 +09:23:06.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263211_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 263211_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:34:27.52 +07:18:21.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263215_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 263215_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:11.93 +08:39:40.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263216_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 263216_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:44:15.33 +02:50:19.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263228_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 263228_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:40:17.27 +08:08:43.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263234_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 263234_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263236_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 263236_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263244_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 263244_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:42:04.41 +06:20:57.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263253_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 263253_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:52:43.22 +08:24:03.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263268_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 263268_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263288_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 263288_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:41:34.66 +04:27:49.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263303_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 263303_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:47.68 +07:43:44.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263320_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 263320_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:36:47.37 +09:32:59.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263325_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 263325_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:23.53 +08:31:39.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263340_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 263340_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263349_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 263349_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:47.33 +03:34:36.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263356_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 263356_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263377_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 263377_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:21.94 +08:46:30.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263399_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 263399_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263459_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 263459_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:23.41 +08:45:40.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263474_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 263474_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:32.73 +04:09:13.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263478_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 263478_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263479_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 263479_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:41.08 +06:17:07.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263526_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 263526_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263531_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 263531_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263541_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 263541_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263543_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 263543_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:39.96 +08:23:55.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263552_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 263552_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:18.87 +07:41:38.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263561_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 263561_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:15.66 +06:44:27.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263590_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 263590_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:40.15 +08:25:17.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263597_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 263597_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263602_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 263602_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:48:56.95 +05:36:17.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82236_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 82236_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74541_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 74541_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127250_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
Preparing report for the candidate 127250_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39586_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 39586_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:18:48.57 +02:43:22.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92913_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 92913_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176533_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 176533_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:23:47.98 +08:29:50.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 246545_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 246545_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:30.41 +08:01:12.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245640_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 245640_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:59.32 +03:01:35.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244939_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 244939_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150359_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
Preparing report for the candidate 150359_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74727_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
Preparing report for the candidate 74727_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173886_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 173886_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:25.58 +08:33:48.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 40196_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
Preparing report for the candidate 40196_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161486_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
Preparing report for the candidate 161486_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37326_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
Preparing report for the candidate 37326_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 213695_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
Preparing report for the candidate 213695_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30620_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
Preparing report for the candidate 30620_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79130_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 79130_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:32.91 +04:39:41.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 210564_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 210564_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:08.60 +10:45:41.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161833_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 161833_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:48:15.77 +08:02:40.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06300_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 06300_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:31.35 +01:05:43.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96041_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
Preparing report for the candidate 96041_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167119_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 167119_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:38:23.52 +08:13:20.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195551_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 195551_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:05.56 +09:02:16.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81305_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
Preparing report for the candidate 81305_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76119_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
Preparing report for the candidate 76119_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18338_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
Preparing report for the candidate 18338_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65952_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
Preparing report for the candidate 65952_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54200_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 54200_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:45.26 +03:18:09.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69220_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 69220_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:41.06 +04:04:24.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 225680_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 225680_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:42.57 +10:01:26.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21589_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
Preparing report for the candidate 21589_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76765_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
Preparing report for the candidate 76765_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49142_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 49142_fd_Mon-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_06-01-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
