This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_3758294_tDOfwTZn
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
U Gem,2461267.9540,9.95,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
U Gem 20260815.4540 9.95CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 15.4540 2461267.9540 12.89 07:07:55.71 +22:26:05.4
194.38292 13.48309 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 6.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.521 Brixia 1 -1 1 13.3 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:07:55.71 +22:26:05.4: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:07:55.71 +22:26:05.4: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461267.9540,12.89,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260815.4540 12.89CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 15.4540 2461267.9540 12.94 07:08:12.17 +17:43:28.8
198.79858 11.58250 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 6.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.202 Chryseis 1 0 1 13.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:08:12.17 +17:43:28.8: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:08:12.17 +17:43:28.8: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461267.9540,12.94,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260815.4540 12.94CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 15.4540 2461267.9540 13.38 07:23:28.45 +26:30:26.6
191.92067 18.32930 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.9" and 6.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.423 Diotima 1 -0 1 13.5 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:23:28.45 +26:30:26.6: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:23:28.45 +26:30:26.6: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461267.9540,13.38,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260815.4540 13.38CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 15.4540 2461267.9540 13.51 07:07:21.13 +24:45:59.8
192.13109 14.30554 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 5.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.779 Nina 0 -1 1 13.7 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:07:21.13 +24:45:59.8: 15.72 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:07:21.13 +24:45:59.8: 15.82 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.76 +/- 0.21
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461267.9540,13.51,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260815.4540 13.51CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 15.4540 2461267.9540 13.83 06:51:02.62 +24:02:29.7
191.23889 10.62437 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 5.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.579 Sidonia 0 1 1 14.2 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:51:02.62 +24:02:29.7: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:51:02.62 +24:02:29.7: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461267.9540,13.83,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260815.4540 13.83CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
U Gem,2461267.9540,9.98,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
U Gem 20260815.4540 9.98CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 15.4540 2461267.9540 13.09 07:29:21.49 +18:06:06.0
200.58970 16.32025 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.2" and 6.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASASSN-V J072921.41+180604.8
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.680 V 14.800 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:29:21.49 +18:06:06.0: 14.25 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:29:21.49 +18:06:06.0: 14.28 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.27 +/- 0.06
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J072921.41+180604.8,2461267.9540,13.09,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J072921.41+180604.8 20260815.4540 13.09CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.68545435 22.02.2026 04:26:53.256 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
First image: 2461093.68545435 22.02.2026 04:26:53.256 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Last image: 2461267.95430038 15.08.2026 10:54:01.553 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_3758294_tDOfwTZn/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 8
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.64
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 10 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 22049
Objects passed selection criteria: 21928
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 15307.5
Average stars matched: 14913.5 (97.4261 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 249108 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Aug 15 06:03:08 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.68545435 22.02.2026 04:26:53.256 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
First image: 2461093.68545435 22.02.2026 04:26:53.256 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Last image: 2461267.95430038 15.08.2026 10:54:01.553 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_3758294_tDOfwTZn/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 168
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.35
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 33 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 140012
Objects passed selection criteria: 139583
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 104981
Average stars matched: 101033 (96.2393 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 605152 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Aug 15 06:04:35 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_3758294_tDOfwTZn/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-53-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0458.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_3758294_tDOfwTZn/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_3758294_tDOfwTZn/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-53-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0458.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_3758294_tDOfwTZn/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461267.95370406
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-53-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0458.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-53-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0458.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-53-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0458.fits
Image size: 945.0'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:12.277 +21:57:43.94 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41
Second-epoch image center 07:23:12.277 +21:57:43.94
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0498 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459.fits
Image size: 944.9'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:09.722 +21:57:41.43 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41
Second-epoch image center 07:23:09.722 +21:57:41.43
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0445 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:23:12.277 +21:57:43.94
Second-epoch second image center 07:23:09.722 +21:57:41.43
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00990 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9iPGwWyCKt
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits &> /tmp/tmp.yEBML1X0qX
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_3758294_tDOfwTZn/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-53-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0458.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8ZHjoJYSqp
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_3758294_tDOfwTZn/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-53-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0458.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_3758294_tDOfwTZn/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459.fits &> /tmp/tmp.V82AxA2F1x
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_3758294_tDOfwTZn/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 23656 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0337 to 119.5911 deg, Dec +16.4797 to +27.2941 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0337 to 119.5911 deg, Dec 16.4797 to 27.2941 deg
Loaded 13974 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10666 out of 11758 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11758 out of 23656 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.929600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.929600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.64
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.29
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.29
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 23656 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0337 to 119.5911 deg, Dec +16.4797 to +27.2941 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0337 to 119.5911 deg, Dec 16.4797 to 27.2941 deg
Loaded 13974 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10666 out of 11758 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11758 out of 23656 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 23398 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0336 to 119.5911 deg, Dec +16.4801 to +27.2943 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0336 to 119.5911 deg, Dec 16.4801 to 27.2943 deg
Loaded 13972 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10626 out of 11736 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11736 out of 23398 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 7 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
2.3 pix Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
2.2 pix fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-53-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0458.fits
2.2 pix fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
15.3 mag. Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-53-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0458.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.9 (SNR ) 11.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.9iPGwWyCKt (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_3758294_tDOfwTZn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2265, bad_region=1, passed=23656
Got 23656 stars (including 21361 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23656 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4849 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4811 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4812 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4811 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23656 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4849 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4811 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23656 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4811 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23656 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4811 stars left (next iteration limit 5292)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits N_match=4811 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.458 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.409 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.341 n_q1=904 n_q2=1356 n_q3=1059 n_q4=1492 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.183
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.yEBML1X0qX (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_3758294_tDOfwTZn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2268, bad_region=1, passed=23398
Got 23398 stars (including 21095 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23398 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4844 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4805 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4806 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4805 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23398 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4845 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4806 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23398 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4806 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23398 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 4806 stars left (next iteration limit 5285)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits N_match=4806 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.426 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.544 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.428 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.377 n_q1=895 n_q2=1351 n_q3=1061 n_q4=1499 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.279
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.8ZHjoJYSqp (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_3758294_tDOfwTZn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_3758294_tDOfwTZn/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-53-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0458.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_3758294_tDOfwTZn/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-53-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0458.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_3758294_tDOfwTZn/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-53-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0458.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_3758294_tDOfwTZn/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-53-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0458.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_3758294_tDOfwTZn/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-53-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0458.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_3758294_tDOfwTZn/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-53-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0458.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-53-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0458.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-53-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0458.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-53-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0458.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-53-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0458.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-53-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0458.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-53-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0458.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-53-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0458.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_3758294_tDOfwTZn/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-53-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0458.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-53-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0458.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=523, bad_region=0, passed=7345
Got 7345 stars (including 6809 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-53-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0458.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7345 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013125 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010500 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4843 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4799 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4799 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4799 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7341 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4843 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4800 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7341 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4800 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7341 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4800 stars left (next iteration limit 5278)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4800 robust_rms=6.636 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=25.715 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4800 robust_rms=0.535 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.882 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4800 robust_rms=0.396 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.487 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4800 robust_rms_before=1.346 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.401 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.396 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.509 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.487
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.509 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-53-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0458.fits N_match=4800 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.474 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.364 n_q1=1620 n_q2=811 n_q3=1566 n_q4=803 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.186
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-53-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0458.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-53-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0458.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_3758294_tDOfwTZn/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-53-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0458.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-53-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0458.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-53-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0458.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.V82AxA2F1x (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_3758294_tDOfwTZn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_3758294_tDOfwTZn/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_3758294_tDOfwTZn/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_3758294_tDOfwTZn/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_3758294_tDOfwTZn/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_3758294_tDOfwTZn/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_3758294_tDOfwTZn/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_3758294_tDOfwTZn/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=566, bad_region=0, passed=7352
Got 7352 stars (including 6778 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7352 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013124 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010499 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4847 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4805 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4807 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4805 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7347 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4847 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4807 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7347 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4806 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7347 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4806 stars left (next iteration limit 5285)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4806 robust_rms=6.827 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=23.572 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4806 robust_rms=0.577 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=1.083 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4806 robust_rms=0.413 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.510 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4806 robust_rms_before=1.415 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.402 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.413 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.496 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.510
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.496 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459.fits N_match=4806 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.384 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.479 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.377 n_q1=1631 n_q2=805 n_q3=1564 n_q4=806 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.185
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_3758294_tDOfwTZn/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-53-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0458.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-53-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0458.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-53-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0458.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits sigma_overall=0.387 worst_q_ratio=1.183
ref2=Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits sigma_overall=0.426 worst_q_ratio=1.279
new1=fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-53-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0458.fits sigma_overall=0.400 worst_q_ratio=1.186
new2=fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459.fits sigma_overall=0.404 worst_q_ratio=1.185
reference average sigma_overall=0.4065 worst_q_ratio=1.231
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153_astrometric_residuals.png (4811 matched stars from wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154_astrometric_residuals.png (4806 matched stars from wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-53-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0458_astrometric_residuals.png (4800 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-53-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0458.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459_astrometric_residuals.png (4806 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-53-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0458.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-53-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0458.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_3758294_tDOfwTZn/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-53-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0458.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_3758294_tDOfwTZn/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:32.41 +23:01:31.0: 11.21 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:42.80 +22:54:43.2: 10.03 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:56:50.63 +20:58:43.1: 10.78 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:09.79 +22:47:45.0: 10.83 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:35.39 +22:51:40.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:42.80 +22:54:43.2: 10.03 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:56:50.63 +20:58:43.1: 10.78 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:32.41 +23:01:31.0: 11.22 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:09.79 +22:47:45.0: 10.82 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:35.39 +22:51:40.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:35.39 +22:51:40.1: the source is saturated (present but too bright to measure) on at least one reference image -- likely a star-matching failure rather than a new transient
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.03 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.78 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.82 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.21 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:42.80 +22:54:43.2: ref_mag=10.03 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=10.5789 delta=-0.55 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:56:50.63 +20:58:43.1: ref_mag=10.78 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.9907 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:09.79 +22:47:45.0: ref_mag=10.82 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.0961 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:32.41 +23:01:31.0: ref_mag=11.21 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.2431 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 3s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31370_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 31370_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31398_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 31398_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:34.10 +25:59:42.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31409_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
Preparing report for the candidate 31409_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31419_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 31419_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31446_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 31446_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31459_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 31459_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31470_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 31470_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 4s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_3758294_tDOfwTZn/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-53-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0458.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_3758294_tDOfwTZn/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_3758294_tDOfwTZn/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-53-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0458.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_3758294_tDOfwTZn/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-53-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0458.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-53-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0458.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-53-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0458.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-53-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0458.fits
Image size: 945.0'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:12.277 +21:57:43.94 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41
Second-epoch image center 07:23:12.277 +21:57:43.94
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0498 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459.fits
Image size: 944.9'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:09.722 +21:57:41.43 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41
Second-epoch image center 07:23:09.722 +21:57:41.43
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0445 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:23:12.277 +21:57:43.94
Second-epoch second image center 07:23:09.722 +21:57:41.43
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00990 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits &> /tmp/tmp.E61ltr1P7Q
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3FYOLk736H
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_3758294_tDOfwTZn/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-53-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0458.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3I1DpUTFot
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_3758294_tDOfwTZn/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-53-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0458.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_3758294_tDOfwTZn/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459.fits &> /tmp/tmp.D4rpW0OwsZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_3758294_tDOfwTZn/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 151496 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0323 to 119.6245 deg, Dec +16.4740 to +27.2968 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0323 to 119.6245 deg, Dec 16.4740 to 27.2968 deg
Loaded 14006 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8794 out of 12008 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12008 out of 151496 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.796750
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.796750
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.35
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 151496 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0323 to 119.6245 deg, Dec +16.4740 to +27.2968 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0323 to 119.6245 deg, Dec 16.4740 to 27.2968 deg
Loaded 14006 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8794 out of 12008 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12008 out of 151496 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (aperture=4.8)
Read 153605 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0325 to 119.6247 deg, Dec +16.4748 to +27.3045 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0325 to 119.6247 deg, Dec 16.4748 to 27.3045 deg
Loaded 14009 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8793 out of 12010 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12010 out of 153605 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits (aperture=4.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 160 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
2.1 pix Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
2.2 pix fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-53-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0458.fits
2.2 pix fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
15.4 mag. Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-53-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0458.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.0 (SNR ) 13.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.E61ltr1P7Q (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_3758294_tDOfwTZn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=46, blended=17705, bad_region=3, passed=151450
Got 151450 stars (including 133484 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 151450 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4826 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4804 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 151450 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4826 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4804 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 151450 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4804 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 151450 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4804 stars left (next iteration limit 5283)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits N_match=4804 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.439 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.333 n_q1=951 n_q2=1322 n_q3=1097 n_q4=1434 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.231
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.3FYOLk736H (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_3758294_tDOfwTZn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=67, blended=17785, bad_region=5, passed=153538
Got 153538 stars (including 135488 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 153538 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4823 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4802 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4803 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4802 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 153538 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4823 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 153538 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 153538 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 4803 stars left (next iteration limit 5282)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits N_match=4803 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.508 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.411 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.371 n_q1=940 n_q2=1323 n_q3=1093 n_q4=1447 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.259
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.3I1DpUTFot (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_3758294_tDOfwTZn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_3758294_tDOfwTZn/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-53-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0458.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_3758294_tDOfwTZn/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-53-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0458.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_3758294_tDOfwTZn/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-53-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0458.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_3758294_tDOfwTZn/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-53-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0458.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_3758294_tDOfwTZn/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-53-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0458.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_3758294_tDOfwTZn/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-53-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0458.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-53-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0458.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-53-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0458.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-53-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0458.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-53-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0458.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-53-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0458.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-53-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0458.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-53-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0458.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_3758294_tDOfwTZn/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-53-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0458.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-53-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0458.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=2738, bad_region=6, passed=58893
Got 58893 stars (including 56037 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-53-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0458.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 58893 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013125 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010500 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4837 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4797 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4797 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4797 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58877 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4837 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4797 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58877 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4797 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58877 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4797 stars left (next iteration limit 5276)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-53-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0458.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4797 robust_rms=6.713 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=24.126 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4797 robust_rms=0.528 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.830 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4797 robust_rms=0.396 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.484 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4797 robust_rms_before=1.347 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.384 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.396 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.497 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.484
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.497 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-53-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0458.fits N_match=4797 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.472 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.340 n_q1=1598 n_q2=816 n_q3=1547 n_q4=836 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.216
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-53-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0458.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-53-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0458.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_3758294_tDOfwTZn/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-53-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0458.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-53-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0458.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-53-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0458.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.D4rpW0OwsZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_3758294_tDOfwTZn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_3758294_tDOfwTZn/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_3758294_tDOfwTZn/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_3758294_tDOfwTZn/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_3758294_tDOfwTZn/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_3758294_tDOfwTZn/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_3758294_tDOfwTZn/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_3758294_tDOfwTZn/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=7, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=2641, bad_region=6, passed=58803
Got 58803 stars (including 56052 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 58803 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013124 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010499 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4838 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4798 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4800 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4798 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58788 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4838 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4797 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58788 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4796 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58788 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4796 stars left (next iteration limit 5277)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4796 robust_rms=6.901 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=23.856 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4796 robust_rms=0.569 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.844 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4796 robust_rms=0.412 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.516 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4796 robust_rms_before=1.420 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.379 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.412 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.463 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.516
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.463 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459.fits N_match=4796 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.464 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.378 n_q1=1587 n_q2=825 n_q3=1551 n_q4=833 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.196
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_3758294_tDOfwTZn/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-53-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0458.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_3758294_tDOfwTZn/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-53-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0458.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_3758294_tDOfwTZn/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:03:35.99 +19:36:30.8: 13.34 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:18:27.82 +22:56:47.9: 13.43 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:21:28.64 +23:40:17.6: 13.37 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:07:45.70 +26:40:36.7: 13.57 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:56:48.77 +21:43:42.0: 13.27 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:52:52.22 +18:14:53.7: 13.02 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:07:25.92 +20:54:37.1: 13.31 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:03:35.99 +19:36:30.8: 13.37 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:56:48.77 +21:43:42.0: 13.43 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:07:45.70 +26:40:36.7: 13.58 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:18:27.82 +22:56:47.9: 13.49 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:21:28.64 +23:40:17.6: 13.41 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.34 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.36 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:52:52.22 +18:14:53.7: 13.08 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:18:27.82 +22:56:47.9: ref_mag=13.46 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.7479 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:56:48.77 +21:43:42.0: ref_mag=13.34 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2412 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:03:35.99 +19:36:30.8: ref_mag=13.36 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5430 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:07:45.70 +26:40:36.7: ref_mag=13.58 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5984 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.39 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:21:28.64 +23:40:17.6: ref_mag=13.39 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5054 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.05 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:52:52.22 +18:14:53.7: ref_mag=13.05 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1162 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:07:25.92 +20:54:37.1: 13.26 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.28 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:07:25.92 +20:54:37.1: ref_mag=13.28 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1869 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:01.29 +19:41:48.6: 12.55 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:07:29.98 +27:10:51.1: 12.64 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:13.84 +22:54:53.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:49.90 +22:56:14.8: 10.41 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:07:29.98 +27:10:51.1: 12.71 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.67 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:01.29 +19:41:48.6: 12.54 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:07:29.98 +27:10:51.1: ref_mag=12.67 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7163 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.54 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:01.29 +19:41:48.6: ref_mag=12.54 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5738 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:13.84 +22:54:53.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:13.84 +22:54:53.7: the source is saturated (present but too bright to measure) on at least one reference image -- likely a star-matching failure rather than a new transient
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:49.90 +22:56:14.8: 10.42 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.41 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:49.90 +22:56:14.8: ref_mag=10.41 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=11.4036 delta=-0.99 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:57:57.51 +22:31:30.8: 12.16 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:11:27.21 +26:25:32.9: 12.54 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:54.85 +22:50:50.9: 10.72 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:57:57.51 +22:31:30.8: 12.21 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.18 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:57:57.51 +22:31:30.8: ref_mag=12.18 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4045 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:11:27.21 +26:25:32.9: 12.54 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.54 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:11:27.21 +26:25:32.9: ref_mag=12.54 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4938 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:54.85 +22:50:50.9: 10.73 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.72 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:54.85 +22:50:50.9: ref_mag=10.72 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=12.4663 delta=-1.74 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:20:35.11 +19:24:26.3: 12.60 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:20:35.11 +19:24:26.3: 12.55 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.57 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:20:35.11 +19:24:26.3: ref_mag=12.57 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4425 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:07:55.71 +22:26:05.4: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:54:23.04 +21:10:52.6: 12.81 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:58:32.36 +18:05:26.8: 12.94 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:07:55.71 +22:26:05.4: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:52:47.53 +20:22:24.9: 13.14 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:01:37.26 +21:43:09.1: 13.07 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:59:35.43 +25:22:45.6: 13.09 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:54:23.04 +21:10:52.6: 12.78 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.80 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:54:23.04 +21:10:52.6: ref_mag=12.80 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9585 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:58:32.36 +18:05:26.8: 12.90 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.92 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:58:32.36 +18:05:26.8: ref_mag=12.92 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8491 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:52:47.53 +20:22:24.9: 13.17 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.15 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:52:47.53 +20:22:24.9: ref_mag=13.15 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0610 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:01:37.26 +21:43:09.1: 13.06 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:59:35.43 +25:22:45.6: 13.14 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.07 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.12 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:01:37.26 +21:43:09.1: ref_mag=13.07 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0339 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:59:35.43 +25:22:45.6: ref_mag=13.12 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1941 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:00.14 +22:57:32.1: 9.34 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:53:42.24 +20:44:45.9: 13.39 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:08:12.17 +17:43:28.8: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:00.14 +22:57:32.1: 9.36 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:24.61 +22:49:54.0: 12.75 +/- 0.36 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:24.61 +22:49:54.0: 12.75 +/- 0.36 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:53:42.24 +20:44:45.9: 13.41 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:08:12.17 +17:43:28.8: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.75 +/- 0.26
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:24.61 +22:49:54.0: ref_mag=12.75 +/- 0.26 new_mean_mag=13.2477 delta=-0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:53:42.24 +20:44:45.9: ref_mag=13.40 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3071 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:10.16 +22:52:12.2: 9.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:43.77 +22:49:13.2: 12.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:10.16 +22:52:12.2: 9.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:29:20.37 +24:26:16.2: 13.22 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:43.77 +22:49:13.2: 12.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:26.13 +22:50:05.8: 12.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:29:20.37 +24:26:16.2: 13.22 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.22 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:29:20.37 +24:26:16.2: ref_mag=13.22 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1188 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:26.13 +22:50:05.8: 12.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:23:28.45 +26:30:26.6: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:43.14 +22:57:51.9: 12.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:23:28.45 +26:30:26.6: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:43.14 +22:57:51.9: 12.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:39.57 +22:49:43.0: 12.85 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:23:41.12 +21:33:52.1: 13.35 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:39.57 +22:49:43.0: 12.93 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.89 +/- 0.20
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:39.57 +22:49:43.0: ref_mag=12.89 +/- 0.20 new_mean_mag=13.4448 delta=-0.55 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:23:41.12 +21:33:52.1: 13.32 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:23:41.12 +21:33:52.1: ref_mag=13.33 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1495 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:08:10.38 +21:53:59.2: 13.58 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:07:21.13 +24:45:59.8: 15.72 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:08:10.38 +21:53:59.2: 13.63 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:08:10.38 +21:53:59.2: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4233 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:29.28 +22:51:11.7: 13.68 +/- 0.36 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:07:21.13 +24:45:59.8: 15.82 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.76 +/- 0.21
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:07:21.13 +24:45:59.8: ref_mag=15.76 +/- 0.21 new_mean_mag=13.5069 delta=2.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:29.28 +22:51:11.7: 13.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.68 +/- 0.36
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:29.28 +22:51:11.7: ref_mag=13.68 +/- 0.36 new_mean_mag=13.4167 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:11.16 +22:51:41.8: 9.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:11.16 +22:51:41.8: 9.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:51:02.62 +24:02:29.7: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:49.77 +22:50:39.2: 11.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:18.97 +22:52:12.7: 9.42 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:08.38 +22:46:26.5: 13.53 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:30.72 +22:58:34.2: 13.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:51:02.62 +24:02:29.7: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:49.77 +22:50:39.2: 11.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:08.38 +22:46:26.5: 13.60 +/- 0.33 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:18.97 +22:52:12.7: 9.43 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.33
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:08.38 +22:46:26.5: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.33 new_mean_mag=13.8958 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:30.72 +22:58:34.2: 13.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:41.37 +22:55:55.5: 13.57 +/- 0.33 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:41.37 +22:55:55.5: 13.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.33
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:41.37 +22:55:55.5: ref_mag=13.57 +/- 0.33 new_mean_mag=13.8590 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:59.39 +22:48:11.3: 12.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:59.39 +22:48:11.3: 12.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:29:21.49 +18:06:06.0: 14.25 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:29:21.49 +18:06:06.0: 14.28 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.27 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:29:21.49 +18:06:06.0: ref_mag=14.27 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.0919 delta=1.17 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out176380.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out176454.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out176516.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out176580.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out176616.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out176797.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out176877.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out176893.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out176918.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out176954.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out120103.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out176174.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out176428.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out176613.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out176688.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out176845.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 12s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 5s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175440_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 175440_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175443_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 175443_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175461_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 175461_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:45.17 +23:07:02.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175471_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 175471_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175473_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 175473_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:22.46 +24:00:02.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175474_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 175474_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175475_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 175475_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:50.77 +21:39:14.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175477_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 175477_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:10.12 +23:16:07.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175482_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 175482_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175485_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 175485_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175487_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 175487_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175488_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 175488_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:34.87 +20:54:47.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175489_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 175489_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:37.23 +18:47:20.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175490_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 175490_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:42.95 +18:23:01.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175491_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 175491_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:05.45 +26:01:15.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175493_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 175493_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:50:13.26 +19:07:39.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175501_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 175501_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:51.31 +17:19:47.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175502_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 175502_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:54:53.92 +20:45:42.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175505_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 175505_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:51.37 +18:23:12.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175507_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 175507_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:10.33 +18:37:45.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175508_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 175508_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:55.81 +26:10:58.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175511_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 175511_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:28.52 +21:02:37.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175512_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 175512_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:44.20 +19:19:31.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175514_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 175514_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:14.98 +18:59:00.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175515_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 175515_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:18.74 +24:28:44.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175517_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 175517_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:50:31.06 +20:09:47.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175518_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 175518_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:06.82 +20:04:18.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175520_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 175520_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:05.74 +23:26:42.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175521_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 175521_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:20.30 +27:06:30.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175525_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 175525_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:54:05.15 +19:40:01.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175526_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 175526_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:17.25 +19:25:35.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175527_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 175527_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175528_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 175528_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175531_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 175531_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:01.20 +25:15:45.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175532_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 175532_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:11.64 +22:11:12.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175534_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 175534_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:01.19 +20:23:53.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175537_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 175537_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:23.26 +22:16:50.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175538_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 175538_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:27.77 +19:32:34.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175539_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 175539_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:38.66 +19:12:51.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175541_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 175541_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:59.65 +26:50:35.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175671_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 175671_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175702_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 175702_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:04.55 +22:51:50.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175752_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 175752_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175765_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 175765_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:12.53 +22:52:40.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175778_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 175778_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:19.21 +24:07:14.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175783_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 175783_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:49.40 +19:28:18.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175787_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 175787_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:25.16 +22:38:50.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175847_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 175847_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:57.34 +22:56:38.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175862_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 175862_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:40.94 +19:13:19.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175872_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 175872_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:43:57.72 +25:46:39.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175892_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 175892_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175922_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 175922_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:54:52.14 +26:07:16.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175925_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 175925_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:37.73 +20:24:28.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175929_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 175929_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:48.12 +17:59:35.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175932_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 175932_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:10.69 +22:27:21.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175944_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 175944_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175986_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 175986_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175993_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 175993_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:37.90 +19:42:59.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176001_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 176001_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:48.80 +19:51:00.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176025_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 176025_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:37.39 +26:03:26.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176034_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 176034_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:33.08 +22:42:06.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176041_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 176041_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:54.01 +23:37:29.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176048_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 176048_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:46:14.95 +18:30:20.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176057_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 176057_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:53.91 +20:58:50.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176060_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 176060_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:40:46.74 +23:15:28.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176064_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 176064_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:41:02.92 +23:03:00.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176066_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 176066_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:21:48.47 +20:26:13.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176067_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 176067_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:48.30 +24:16:06.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176069_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 176069_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176082_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 176082_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:54:26.82 +20:36:53.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176090_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 176090_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:22.88 +25:23:47.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176096_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 176096_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:40.82 +22:57:36.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176116_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 176116_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:46.90 +22:42:07.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176126_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 176126_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:08.03 +21:35:21.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176127_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 176127_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:20.45 +26:22:28.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176130_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 176130_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:25.34 +25:56:20.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176135_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 176135_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:06.49 +18:39:20.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176142_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 176142_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:36.94 +17:45:35.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176144_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 176144_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:36:01.19 +26:51:14.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176150_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 176150_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:42.47 +21:18:41.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176151_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 176151_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:02.97 +23:25:47.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176160_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 176160_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:19.06 +25:55:36.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176164_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 176164_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:18.04 +24:27:53.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176174_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
Preparing report for the candidate 176174_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176181_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 176181_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:43:14.52 +22:23:10.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176186_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 176186_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:32:08.79 +23:56:51.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176190_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 176190_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:13.20 +18:03:51.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176197_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 176197_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:22.44 +20:30:20.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176198_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 176198_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176201_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 176201_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:45.89 +23:26:50.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176208_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 176208_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:42.18 +22:10:16.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176211_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 176211_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176219_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 176219_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:15.37 +21:47:41.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176228_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 176228_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176236_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 176236_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:21:57.62 +20:28:25.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176296_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 176296_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:50:42.72 +23:41:35.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176304_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 176304_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176319_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 176319_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176330_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 176330_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:23.15 +22:43:57.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176338_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 176338_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:45.89 +25:33:06.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176343_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 176343_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:50.83 +18:51:17.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176368_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 176368_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:46.10 +19:29:52.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176374_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 176374_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:54.31 +24:32:03.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176380_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 176380_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:00.14 +22:57:32.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.06, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.04)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.450 3368234956935238144 106.50071814721 +22.95893180855 13.1317 12.6845 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.450#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176384_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 176384_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:19.28 +22:04:39.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176385_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 176385_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176411_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 176411_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:23.34 +18:07:04.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176428_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
Preparing report for the candidate 176428_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176445_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 176445_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176454_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 176454_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:10.16 +22:52:12.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.15, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.13)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.362 3368233135869110528 106.54223119847 +22.87009076704 12.9821 12.2486 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.362#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176508_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 176508_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:27.67 +22:58:42.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176512_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 176512_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:48.01 +21:45:35.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176516_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 176516_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:43.77 +22:49:13.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.22, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.20)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.532 3368231241785671168 106.43253095438 +22.82036711775 12.5988 11.4487 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.532#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176546_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 176546_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:55.92 +27:08:04.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176553_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 176553_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:28:39.43 +26:48:54.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176562_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 176562_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176565_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 176565_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:28.63 +19:21:20.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176573_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 176573_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:36.62 +19:19:51.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176575_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 176575_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:11.12 +24:39:05.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176580_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 176580_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:26.13 +22:50:05.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.36, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.34)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.486 3368230180931608064 106.60902016112 +22.83492540249 13.5281 13.1058 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.486#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176591_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 176591_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:55.41 +21:31:10.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176599_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 176599_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:56.53 +22:46:45.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176610_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 176610_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:49.13 +25:18:28.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176613_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
Preparing report for the candidate 176613_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176616_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 176616_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:43.14 +22:57:51.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.28, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.26)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.461 3368422458027739008 106.42987537219 +22.96436107636 13.3954 12.9437 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.461#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176617_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 176617_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:10.99 +20:06:30.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176621_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 176621_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:55.02 +24:28:13.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176623_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 176623_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:49.52 +26:19:03.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176626_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 176626_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:03.49 +19:28:23.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176631_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 176631_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176655_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 176655_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176656_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 176656_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:35:49.45 +24:54:15.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176659_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 176659_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:40.69 +20:31:58.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176673_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 176673_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176688_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
Preparing report for the candidate 176688_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176697_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 176697_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:33.13 +19:14:12.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176707_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 176707_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:45.55 +20:26:52.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176757_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 176757_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176761_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 176761_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:45.44 +21:44:05.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176763_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 176763_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:41.10 +22:08:54.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176791_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 176791_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:30.35 +20:05:40.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176797_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 176797_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:11.16 +22:51:41.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.52, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.50)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.181 3368233067149634688 106.54653859129 +22.86157545659 13.5874 13.1158 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.181#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176801_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 176801_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:41.52 +19:34:19.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176809_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 176809_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:17.14 +22:39:53.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176821_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 176821_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:01.22 +21:22:01.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176845_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
Preparing report for the candidate 176845_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176864_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 176864_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:22.66 +20:00:48.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176877_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 176877_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:49.77 +22:50:39.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.70, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.68)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.342 3368231654102530304 106.45742534291 +22.84413940434 13.7004 13.0106 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.342#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176893_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 176893_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:18.97 +22:52:12.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.88, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.86)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.221 3368230524528990464 106.57898817139 +22.87015792670 13.8868 13.6008 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.221#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176905_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 176905_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176918_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 176918_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:30.72 +22:58:34.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.01, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.99)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.609 3368423213941984384 106.37817681810 +22.97612043775 14.0755 13.5332 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.609#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176950_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 176950_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176954_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 176954_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:59.39 +22:48:11.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.97, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.95)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.595 3368228359865491200 106.49731124917 +22.80323330507 14.0232 13.6048 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.595#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05956_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 05956_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:12.39 +26:47:36.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15633_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 15633_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:34.10 +25:59:42.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163920_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 163920_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:34.42 +24:13:20.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66489_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
Preparing report for the candidate 66489_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120103_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
Preparing report for the candidate 120103_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100568_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 100568_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:31.07 +20:02:07.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111481_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459
The candidate 111481_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_05-54-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0459 did not pass the final checks
