######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC=
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK=
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN=
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP=
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION=
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER=
HOME=
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.nao.ac.jp
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.nao.ac.jp)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory:
Cet-11-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Cet-11-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing Cet-11-Q2b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 194294 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 194294 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-52-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-52-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits_preview.png'
Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-52-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits

renamed 'Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits_preview.png'
Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits

Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1654.6390
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 511.5033
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1857.9939
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 519.9515
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1854.4320
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 519.3992
----------------------------------------------
INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 1.1229
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.001
INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 24.7999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 24.8 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-52-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-52-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-52-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-15T04:52:16.5026401' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-15T09:52:16.5026401' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61267.4113021065 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-15T09:52:26.4068875' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61267.411416736 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 26.6628530197166 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = -17.9996440357371 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 35.9127777777778 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 159.941666666667 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.70177286613279 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cet-11' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '01 46 40' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-18 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20449 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20449 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 24.7999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 24.7999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 15.9 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 58.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 903.18 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 24.8 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 44.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 13.00104 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 8.600688 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-52-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-52-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-52-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/d_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-52-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits :)
Spent 0.468931 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/d_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-52-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-52-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-52-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 24.7900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 24.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-15T04:53:02.7226793' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-15T09:53:02.7226793' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61267.41183706 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-15T09:53:12.6225842' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61267.4119516434 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 26.6628529711288 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = -17.9996440420669 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 35.9672222222222 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 160.1575 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.69955591713769 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cet-11' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '01 46 40' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-18 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20449 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20449 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 24.7900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 24.7900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 15.9 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 58.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 903.18 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 24.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 42.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 13.00104 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 6.800544 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/d_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits :)
Spent 0.478050 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/d_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-52-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-52-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits

fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits

Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-52-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-52-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461267.91141785
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-52-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:46:40.180 -17:59:54.65 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-52-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-52-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:46:39.937 -17:59:40.66 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 01:46:40.180 -17:59:54.65
Second-epoch image center 01:46:39.937 -17:59:40.66
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0040 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:46:40.214 -18:00:09.78 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 01:46:40.180 -17:59:54.65
Second-epoch image center 01:46:40.214 -18:00:09.78
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0042 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 01:46:39.937 -17:59:40.66
Second-epoch second image center 01:46:40.214 -18:00:09.78
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00816 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YnQvqkJ65e
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7H49u9HjDK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-52-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RjpHpLJ9Hb
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-52-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1WEMm3jNsS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits and wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits and wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits and wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 3748 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 18.1303 to 35.1139 deg, Dec -23.2882 to -12.6120 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 18.1303 to 35.1139 deg, Dec -23.2882 to -12.6120 deg
Loaded 4115 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2743 out of 2866 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2866 out of 3748 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.863300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.863300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.16
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.70
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.70
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 3748 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 18.1303 to 35.1139 deg, Dec -23.2882 to -12.6120 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 18.1303 to 35.1139 deg, Dec -23.2882 to -12.6120 deg
Loaded 4115 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2743 out of 2866 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2866 out of 3748 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 4329 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 18.3267 to 35.1802 deg, Dec -23.3270 to -12.4424 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 18.3267 to 35.1802 deg, Dec -23.3270 to -12.4424 deg
Loaded 4183 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3033 out of 3123 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3123 out of 4329 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits (aperture=5.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
2.1 pix Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits
2.2 pix fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-52-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits
2.3 pix fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.7 mag. Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
15.0 mag. Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-52-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 11.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.YnQvqkJ65e (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=374, bad_region=898, passed=3748
Got 3748 stars (including 2571 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3748 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2528 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2528 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2528 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2528 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3031 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2528 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2528 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3031 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2528 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3031 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 2528 stars left (next iteration limit 2780)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits N_match=2528 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.374 n_q1=748 n_q2=506 n_q3=779 n_q4=495 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.090
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits -region wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.7H49u9HjDK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=326, bad_region=1019, passed=4329
Got 4329 stars (including 3046 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4329 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2977 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3480 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3480 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3480 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Excluding outliers - 2977 stars left (next iteration limit 3274)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits N_match=2977 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.265 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.241 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.254 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.229 n_q1=929 n_q2=528 n_q3=973 n_q4=547 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.304
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits -region wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.RjpHpLJ9Hb (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-52-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-52-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-52-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-52-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-52-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-52-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-52-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-52-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-52-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-52-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-52-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-52-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-52-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-52-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-52-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=249, bad_region=720, passed=3130
Got 3130 stars (including 2217 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-52-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3130 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2179 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2179 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2179 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2179 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2546 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2180 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2180 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2546 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2180 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2546 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 2180 stars left (next iteration limit 2396)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2180 robust_rms=6.890 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=9.354 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2180 robust_rms=0.469 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.613 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2180 robust_rms=0.333 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.369 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2180 robust_rms_before=1.031 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.341 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.333 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.381 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.369
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.381 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-52-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits N_match=2180 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.288 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.396 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.328 n_q1=674 n_q2=431 n_q3=689 n_q4=386 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.169
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-52-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-52-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-52-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-52-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-52-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.1WEMm3jNsS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=301, bad_region=740, passed=3197
Got 3197 stars (including 2208 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3197 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2173 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2173 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2173 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2173 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2596 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2173 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2173 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2596 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2173 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2596 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 2173 stars left (next iteration limit 2390)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2173 robust_rms=6.949 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=9.206 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2173 robust_rms=0.481 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.629 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2173 robust_rms=0.354 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.402 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2173 robust_rms_before=1.050 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.357 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.354 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.388 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.402
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.388 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits N_match=2173 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.339 n_q1=658 n_q2=440 n_q3=687 n_q4=388 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.157
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-52-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-52-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-52-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits sigma_overall=0.400 worst_q_ratio=1.090
ref2=Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits sigma_overall=0.265 worst_q_ratio=1.304
new1=fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-52-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits sigma_overall=0.338 worst_q_ratio=1.169
new2=fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits sigma_overall=0.363 worst_q_ratio=1.157
reference average sigma_overall=0.3325 worst_q_ratio=1.197
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028_astrometric_residuals.png (2528 matched stars from wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086_astrometric_residuals.png (2977 matched stars from wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-52-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480_astrometric_residuals.png (2180 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-52-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481_astrometric_residuals.png (2173 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)

Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-52-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-52-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-52-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-11-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-11-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-52-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-52-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-52-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-52-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:46:40.180 -17:59:54.65 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-52-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-52-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:46:39.937 -17:59:40.66 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 01:46:40.180 -17:59:54.65
Second-epoch image center 01:46:39.937 -17:59:40.66
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0040 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:46:40.214 -18:00:09.78 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 01:46:40.180 -17:59:54.65
Second-epoch image center 01:46:40.214 -18:00:09.78
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0042 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 01:46:39.937 -17:59:40.66
Second-epoch second image center 01:46:40.214 -18:00:09.78
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00816 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits &> /tmp/tmp.mRIuxhJ3yT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XW1VGhptf8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-52-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits &> /tmp/tmp.BtAeOTpwiA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-52-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits &> /tmp/tmp.TcM6a30brd
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits and wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits and wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits and wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 21033 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 18.1142 to 35.1618 deg, Dec -23.2881 to -12.5807 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 18.1142 to 35.1618 deg, Dec -23.2881 to -12.5807 deg
Loaded 4142 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3196 out of 3400 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3400 out of 21033 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.726550
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.726550
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.85
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.88
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.88
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 21033 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 18.1142 to 35.1618 deg, Dec -23.2881 to -12.5807 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 18.1142 to 35.1618 deg, Dec -23.2881 to -12.5807 deg
Loaded 4142 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3196 out of 3400 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3400 out of 21033 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits (aperture=4.9)
Read 23371 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 18.3056 to 35.3091 deg, Dec -23.3269 to -12.4103 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 18.3056 to 35.3091 deg, Dec -23.3269 to -12.4103 deg
Loaded 4230 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3215 out of 3388 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3388 out of 23371 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 29 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
2.0 pix Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits
2.1 pix fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-52-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits
2.1 pix fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.9 mag. Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
15.1 mag. Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-52-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 14.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.mRIuxhJ3yT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=795, bad_region=4192, passed=21031
Got 21031 stars (including 16212 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 21031 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4861 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4854 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4854 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4854 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17784 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4861 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4854 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17784 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4854 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17784 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4854 stars left (next iteration limit 5339)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits N_match=4854 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.458 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.384 n_q1=1466 n_q2=935 n_q3=1537 n_q4=916 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.113
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits -region wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.XW1VGhptf8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=721, bad_region=4135, passed=23360
Got 23360 stars (including 18613 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23360 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4860 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4855 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20150 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4860 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20150 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20150 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4855 stars left (next iteration limit 5340)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits N_match=4855 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.290 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.268 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.266 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.261 n_q1=1610 n_q2=901 n_q3=1501 n_q4=843 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.222
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits -region wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.BtAeOTpwiA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-52-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-52-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-52-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-52-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-52-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-52-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-52-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-52-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-52-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-52-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-52-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-52-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-52-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-52-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-52-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=549, bad_region=3393, passed=18007
Got 18007 stars (including 14164 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-52-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 18007 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4858 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4852 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4852 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4852 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15452 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4857 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4851 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15452 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4851 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15452 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4851 stars left (next iteration limit 5337)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-52-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4851 robust_rms=6.663 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=9.026 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4851 robust_rms=0.501 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.639 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4851 robust_rms=0.385 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.445 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4851 robust_rms_before=1.030 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.383 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.385 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.441 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.445
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.441 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-52-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits N_match=4851 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.357 n_q1=1520 n_q2=913 n_q3=1507 n_q4=911 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.177
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-52-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-52-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-52-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-52-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-52-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.TcM6a30brd (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=2, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=717, bad_region=3411, passed=18255
Got 18255 stars (including 14243 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 18255 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4851 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4845 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4845 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4845 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15671 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4851 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4845 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15671 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4845 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15671 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4845 stars left (next iteration limit 5329)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4845 robust_rms=6.730 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=9.076 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4845 robust_rms=0.520 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.659 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4845 robust_rms=0.403 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.460 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4845 robust_rms_before=1.051 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.397 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.403 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.440 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.460
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.440 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits N_match=4845 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.398 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.356 n_q1=1523 n_q2=918 n_q3=1498 n_q4=906 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.142
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-52-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-52-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-11-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits at 01:23:52.03 -17:10:47.4: 12.68 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits at 01:45:09.59 -20:03:07.6: 10.35 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits at 01:24:31.27 -17:08:09.7: 12.92 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits at 01:48:59.05 -20:39:09.9: 13.00 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits at 02:03:56.51 -17:32:14.2: 13.27 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits at 01:26:11.83 -21:46:26.3: 14.54 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits at 01:45:09.59 -20:03:07.6: 10.38 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits at 01:24:31.27 -17:08:09.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits at 01:23:52.03 -17:10:47.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits at 01:48:59.05 -20:39:09.9: 13.18 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.92 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.37 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.68 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:24:31.27 -17:08:09.7: ref_mag=12.92 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.1173 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:45:09.59 -20:03:07.6: ref_mag=10.37 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.7552 delta=-0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.09 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:23:52.03 -17:10:47.4: ref_mag=12.68 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2677 delta=-0.58 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:48:59.05 -20:39:09.9: ref_mag=13.09 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2292 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits at 02:03:56.51 -17:32:14.2: 13.20 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits at 01:23:11.76 -17:13:19.4: 13.88 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.23 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:03:56.51 -17:32:14.2: ref_mag=13.23 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3716 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits at 01:25:59.50 -21:39:20.4: 14.80 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits at 01:26:11.83 -21:46:26.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.54 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:26:11.83 -21:46:26.3: ref_mag=14.54 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=13.9997 delta=0.54 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits at 01:23:11.76 -17:13:19.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits at 01:25:59.50 -21:39:20.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:23:11.76 -17:13:19.4: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.0472 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.22
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:25:59.50 -21:39:20.4: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.22 new_mean_mag=14.2487 delta=0.55 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37139_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 37139_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 08 15.41142 | 2461267.91142 | 10.62 | 01:45:09.49 -20:03:07.4 | 4570 1953 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-52-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 15.41195 | 2461267.91195 | 10.94 | 01:45:09.68 -20:03:07.7 | 4570 1957 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37146_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 37146_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 15.41195 | 2461267.91195 | 11.96 | 01:18:07.74 -20:21:02.6 | 0711 1700 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37147_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 37147_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 15.41195 | 2461267.91195 | 11.99 | 01:41:17.67 -19:38:34.9 | 4020 2204 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37152_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 37152_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 15.41195 | 2461267.91195 | 12.54 | 01:19:30.82 -21:52:49.3 | 0940 0773 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37162_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 37162_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 15.41195 | 2461267.91195 | 12.89 | 01:24:15.25 -14:27:21.3 | 1498 5316 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37168_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 37168_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 08 15.41142 | 2461267.91142 | 13.11 | 01:24:31.33 -17:08:09.8 | 1582 3681 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-52-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 15.41195 | 2461267.91195 | 13.12 | 01:24:31.21 -17:08:09.7 | 1581 3686 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37169_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 37169_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 08 15.41142 | 2461267.91142 | 13.21 | 01:23:52.09 -17:10:47.6 | 1487 3652 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-52-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 15.41195 | 2461267.91195 | 13.38 | 01:23:51.96 -17:10:47.2 | 1486 3657 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37172_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 37172_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 08 15.41142 | 2461267.91142 | 13.29 | 01:48:59.06 -20:39:10.5 | 5111 1586 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-52-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 15.41195 | 2461267.91195 | 13.18 | 01:48:59.04 -20:39:09.2 | 5110 1592 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37174_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 37174_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 15.41195 | 2461267.91195 | 13.31 | 01:32:56.08 -14:02:21.4 | 2777 5588 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37175_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 37175_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 15.41195 | 2461267.91195 | 13.18 | 02:01:19.34 -14:21:42.3 | 6950 5374 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37177_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 37177_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 15.41195 | 2461267.91195 | 13.68 | 01:21:14.72 -16:39:28.9 | 1093 3964 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37178_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 37178_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 08 15.41142 | 2461267.91142 | 13.39 | 02:03:56.57 -17:32:13.9 | 7284 3434 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-52-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 15.41195 | 2461267.91195 | 13.36 | 02:03:56.46 -17:32:14.5 | 7283 3439 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37182_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 37182_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 15.41195 | 2461267.91195 | 13.45 | 01:58:21.53 -17:26:06.2 | 6476 3519 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37186_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 37186_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 15.41195 | 2461267.91195 | 13.60 | 01:26:11.02 -14:07:36.5 | 1779 5522 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37191_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 37191_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 15.41195 | 2461267.91195 | 13.68 | 01:51:18.47 -15:34:53.1 | 5470 4654 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37200_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 37200_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 15.41195 | 2461267.91195 | 14.12 | 01:44:09.93 -15:05:34.8 | 4430 4955 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37203_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 37203_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 15.41195 | 2461267.91195 | 14.23 | 01:28:59.84 -17:29:00.4 | 2238 3489 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37204_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 37204_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 15.41195 | 2461267.91195 | 13.71 | 01:26:15.53 -13:43:28.1 | 1784 5768 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37205_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 37205_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 15.41195 | 2461267.91195 | 13.70 | 01:36:30.11 -18:26:43.1 | 3330 2923 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37207_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 37207_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 15.41195 | 2461267.91195 | 13.86 | 01:55:51.26 -14:06:10.0 | 6148 5544 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37216_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 37216_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 08 15.41142 | 2461267.91142 | 14.13 | 01:26:11.79 -21:46:26.0 | 1891 0868 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-52-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 15.41195 | 2461267.91195 | 13.93 | 01:26:11.88 -21:46:26.6 | 1891 0873 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37220_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 37220_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 08 15.41142 | 2461267.91142 | 14.14 | 01:23:11.64 -17:13:19.8 | 1389 3624 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-52-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 15.41195 | 2461267.91195 | 13.98 | 01:23:11.88 -17:13:19.0 | 1389 3629 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37227_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 37227_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 08 15.41142 | 2461267.91142 | 14.26 | 01:25:59.53 -21:39:20.9 | 1861 0939 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-52-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 15.41195 | 2461267.91195 | 14.24 | 01:25:59.47 -21:39:20.0 | 1860 0944 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37230_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 37230_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 15.41195 | 2461267.91195 | 14.28 | 01:32:14.90 -21:58:11.0 | 2750 0776 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37242_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 37242_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 15.41195 | 2461267.91195 | 14.31 | 01:22:08.35 -15:22:52.2 | 1201 4745 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37245_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 37245_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 15.41195 | 2461267.91195 | 14.30 | 01:32:13.86 -14:14:46.3 | 2675 5461 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37249_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 37249_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 15.41195 | 2461267.91195 | 14.01 | 01:26:01.68 -21:38:29.9 | 1865 0953 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37251_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 37251_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 15.41195 | 2461267.91195 | 13.97 | 01:42:08.60 -13:55:38.0 | 4133 5663 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37257_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481
The candidate 37257_fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 15.41195 | 2461267.91195 | 14.46 | 01:28:32.31 -14:07:06.3 | 2128 5532 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_052316_TTUQ2b1x1_1620691_IiHuIfJU/fd_Cet-11-Q2b1x1_2026-08-15_04-53-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-11-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
########### Completed Cet-11-Q2b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
###################################################################################
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461267.91141785 -observatory V36
08:49:34.29 +18:50:05.4 Mercury (-1.3mag)
12:27:31.93 -04:31:17.2 Venus (-4.4mag)
06:10:04.17 +23:42:25.9 Mars (1.3mag)
08:49:22.78 +18:16:58.5 Jupiter (-1.8mag)
00:55:45.18 +03:09:12.3 Saturn (0.6mag)
04:12:28.74 +20:58:53.2 Uranus (5.7mag)
00:15:38.71 +00:09:52.5 Neptune (7.7mag)
20:27:27.90 -23:32:50.9 Pluto (14.5mag)
11:46:08.86 -01:36:24.3 Moon (-9.0mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Aug 15 05:26 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461267.91141785:
08:49:23.47 +18:16:55.3 Io (6.1mag)
08:49:32.25 +18:16:16.9 Europa (6.3mag)
08:49:39.75 +18:15:43.2 Ganymede (5.6mag)
08:49:32.89 +18:16:11.7 Callisto (6.8mag)
08:46:51.37 +18:20:45.7 Himalia (15.7mag)
08:49:26.92 +18:16:41.3 Thebe (16.6mag)
08:46:27.70 +18:17:53.3 Elara (17.7mag)
08:53:31.50 +17:53:10.1 Pasiphae (17.9mag)
08:52:04.64 +18:28:52.5 Carme (19.0mag)
00:55:52.48 +03:08:38.9 Titan (8.4mag)
00:55:38.92 +03:09:12.6 Rhea (9.7mag)
00:56:12.12 +03:09:29.1 Iapetus (11.1mag)
00:55:55.26 +03:08:32.1 Hyperion (14.4mag)
00:54:58.48 +03:01:28.0 Phoebe (16.4mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Aug 15 05:26 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461267.91141785:
19:34:01.67 -18:56:29.5 JWST
19:51:41.67 -19:27:58.8 Chandra
06:28:21.96 +18:19:23.1 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Aug 15 05:26 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461267.91141785 -observatory V36
03:21:29.17 +17:57:02.7 17.6mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist)
18:00:17.16 -34:33:54.4 14.1mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
07:00:22.73 -69:11:01.8 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
06:11:37.46 +33:08:56.7 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
04:03:54.85 +40:25:09.5 17.1mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
22:32:37.72 +30:57:37.9 17.3mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
06:50:29.62 +26:24:48.6 16.8mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
10:28:14.47 +28:09:00.6 17.0mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
09:33:40.80 +05:18:34.8 17.9mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
15:13:52.55 -12:34:34.1 17.9mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
21:01:30.90 +65:07:20.1 17.9mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
15:41:21.79 -13:36:07.2 14.5mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
08:16:00.20 +31:40:34.9 15.4mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:06:03.51 +15:34:03.9 17.8mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
18:54:24.62 +43:23:24.7 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
20:59:57.28 +49:33:10.7 17.6mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS)
05:20:44.39 -12:54:30.5 15.4mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
07:00:43.29 +22:52:37.2 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
07:33:35.77 -17:10:35.5 18.0mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS)
10:43:04.32 +20:26:16.8 17.2mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
13:02:38.40 +01:51:29.9 16.9mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
16:04:16.52 +77:05:56.0 16.6mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
03:09:26.57 +46:18:12.1 17.2mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
11:52:49.34 +09:16:50.4 17.3mag A/2026 E1
22:05:51.26 -30:06:10.8 7.0mag 10P/Tempel
11:33:20.48 -03:51:16.9 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
04:47:53.55 +33:06:03.9 18.0mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson
11:22:19.78 +02:17:18.4 17.3mag 63P/Wild
00:53:21.37 -05:44:55.1 15.4mag 65P/Gunn
05:51:40.71 +20:31:19.9 13.7mag 78P/Gehrels
20:31:32.14 -24:19:18.3 17.6mag 84P/Giclas
03:07:11.37 +14:10:30.3 16.8mag 88P/Howell
08:13:54.99 +26:38:43.2 16.3mag 93P/Lovas
04:26:53.14 +19:40:44.0 17.4mag 112P/Urata-Niijima
06:20:07.97 +29:25:20.6 16.2mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
09:35:28.32 +25:23:29.9 15.0mag 123P/West-Hartley
11:58:12.73 -13:00:31.9 17.2mag 124P/Mrkos
05:47:01.35 +21:07:45.1 16.1mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
06:40:39.27 +18:31:26.1 17.9mag 131P/Mueller
00:01:51.03 +03:17:46.7 17.5mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma
03:16:30.30 -18:53:31.5 13.3mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
07:40:42.85 +38:04:22.7 16.0mag 162P/Siding Spring
12:47:17.35 +39:07:47.0 12.0mag 169P/NEAT
02:55:32.07 +09:32:23.7 17.6mag 220P/McNaught
16:45:47.04 -10:37:12.1 17.9mag 235P/LINEAR
20:18:21.97 -52:30:57.0 17.9mag 259P/Garradd
03:43:06.41 +28:08:08.1 15.3mag 260P/McNaught
07:26:55.75 +37:28:37.9 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR
15:13:05.07 +02:20:21.1 17.8mag 391P/Kowalski
09:07:26.36 +18:01:11.1 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.5K Aug 15 05:26 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08
22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17
14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02
12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61
16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09
01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97
21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13
18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06
12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98
13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38
18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63
14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36
20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83
18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86
03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12
18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16
04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02
18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73
17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01
14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46
10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67
14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11
10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58
19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5
02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86
23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47
02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78
18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29
13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72
17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66
11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3
23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15
20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53
19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88
11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82
19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31
17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67
19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52
18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92
19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91
19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81
04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96
13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01
16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07
10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63
14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62
13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09
00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13
11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56
21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14
17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72
14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53
20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4
15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57
23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64
17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15
00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20 AT2026ntk 2026-06-18.09 17.34
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93
23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83
02:02:26.67 +32:04:22.70 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.6 15.52
21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05
17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62
13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24
00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22
14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32
12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69
12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02
10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75
13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58
00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58
01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70 SN 2026obc 2026-06-7.43 15.15
21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90 ASASSN-26dr 2026-06-7.24 16.24
06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00 ASASSN-26ds 2026-06-2.97 15.02
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12
11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63
11:44:33.11 -68:48:32.90 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24.03 8.35
19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28
14:23:56.59 -58:37:47.40 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.59
11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86
00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34
15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44
11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55
13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96
02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37
17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8
16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8
09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63
21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9
14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21
14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89
12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5
13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23
09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51
15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.40 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.07 13.88
10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52
22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2
21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51
16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.15 15.93
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Aug 15 05:26 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2 PNV J00423868+4115582 2026-06-05.1224 19.97Umag
19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7 PNV J19004295-4831017 2026-05-25.0752 14.2mag
09:55:21.28 +69:02:52.6 PNV J09552128+6902526 2026-06-13.933 18.9mag
19:51:21.42 +37:06:40.0 TCP J19512142+3706400 2026-06-17.2942 16.8mag
19:57:03.87 +37:41:46.4 TCP J19570387+3741464 2026-06-18.2638 17.5mag
00:42:32.04 +41:10:28.3 PNV J00423204+4110283 2026-06-26.059 16.6mag
02:19:17.36 +28:57:15.8 TCP J02191736+2857158 2026-07-12.3549 12.5mag
00:44:56.43 +41:57:41.6 PNV J00445643+4157416 2026-07-13.8026 17.98Cmag
00:42:55.36 +41:17:27.0 PNV J00425536+4117270 2026-07-20.1813 17.7mag
20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9 TCP J20354364+6131329 2026-07-20.5443 14.4mag
21:17:31.48 +22:25:51.0 TCP J21173148+2225510 2026-07-23.5577 14.8mag
00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8 PNV J00412404+4049028 2026-07-25.0157 18.7mag
00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6 PNV J00430426+4102286 2026-07-26.1512 20mag
14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0 TCP J14515140+6613240 2026-07-29.2561 13.5mag
00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2 PNV J00430615+4122082 2026-07-30.0085 19.4mag
00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2 PNV J00413323+4110122 2026-08-02.8913 17.1mag
05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-06.4109 11.2mag
22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8 TCP J22571796+4707418 2026-08-09.3289 14.3mag
09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1 PSN J09133817+7628181 2026-08-09.8037 15.4mag
00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6 PNV J00431729+4126486 2026-08-14.0920 16.8mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 190K Aug 15 05:26 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
21:04:55.813 -06:26:05.52 AT 2026wsx 2026-07-23.35 20.5091
03:47:34.437 +68:09:54.16 AT 2026wsw 2026-08-02.41 19.7792
04:02:36.050 +67:49:01.51 AT 2026wsv 2026-08-02.41 18.9025
15:16:25.327 +02:43:56.18 AT 2026wsu 2026-07-31.40 19.42
15:25:51.491 +01:42:57.75 AT 2026wst 2026-08-01.40 19.99
14:17:22.595 -10:57:31.69 AT 2026wss 2026-07-31.37 20.26
20:02:55.139 -20:38:50.67 SN 2026wsr 2026-08-01.48 19.4
20:26:36.597 -16:24:13.42 AT 2026wsq 2026-08-02.44 19.93
15:55:36.050 +34:52:50.49 AT 2026wsp 2026-07-03.79 20.27
14:24:10.330 +20:12:30.32 AT 2026wso 2026-06-30.73 19.52
15:20:13.950 +29:22:20.59 AT 2026wsn 2026-06-10.82 20.38
14:35:28.090 +47:29:25.39 AT 2026wsm 2026-06-03.82 20.08
14:15:37.120 +48:07:15.97 AT 2026wsl 2026-05-17.80 21.32
14:37:13.610 +28:35:46.66 AT 2026wsk 2026-05-13.84 21.13
15:36:59.920 +37:58:25.96 AT 2026wsj 2026-05-13.82 20.36
15:10:01.090 +36:32:31.60 AT 2026wsi 2026-05-13.82 21.65
15:17:28.950 +42:54:53.99 AT 2026wsh 2026-05-13.81 22.28
14:47:04.860 +54:09:15.74 AT 2026wsg 2026-05-13.80 21
13:29:30.500 +44:12:10.06 AT 2026wsf 2026-05-13.79 22.33
15:22:00.640 +39:49:35.00 AT 2026wse 2026-05-08.84 20.97
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 87K Aug 15 05:26 tns_transients_list.txt