This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050345_TTUQ1b1x1_399710_HHKGN6uw
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461267.9144,6.80,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260815.4144 6.80CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 15.4144 2461267.9144 9.07 06:02:49.99 +22:23:51.5
187.60044 0.03102 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 5.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1 Ceres 0 0 0 8.9 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:02:49.99 +22:23:51.5: 15.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:02:49.99 +22:23:51.5: 15.55 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461267.9144,9.07,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260815.4144 9.07CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 15.4144 2461267.9144 11.22 06:18:29.71 +22:52:51.2
188.91857 3.43055 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 5.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.27 Euterpe -1 1 1 11.6 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:18:29.71 +22:52:51.2: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:18:29.71 +22:52:51.2: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461267.9144,11.22,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260815.4144 11.22CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461267.9144,7.28,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260815.4144 7.28CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 15.4144 2461267.9144 12.00 06:24:57.42 +24:37:07.6
188.06509 5.54774 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 5.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.30 Urania 0 -0 0 12.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:24:57.42 +24:37:07.6: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:24:57.42 +24:37:07.6: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461267.9144,12.00,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260815.4144 12.00CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 15.4144 2461267.9144 12.91 06:12:09.47 +19:42:07.7
191.01382 0.62002 galactic Ori Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 5.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.712 Boliviana 0 0 1 13.4 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:12:09.47 +19:42:07.7: 15.68 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:12:09.47 +19:42:07.7: 15.23 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.37 +/- 0.16
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 15.4144* 06 12 09.47 +19 42 07.7 12.9 U Ori 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461267.9144,12.91,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260815.4144 12.91CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 15.4144 2461267.9144 13.56 06:31:14.84 +19:42:22.4
193.11846 4.59074 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 5.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.308 Polyxo 0 0 0 14.0 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:31:14.84 +19:42:22.4: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:31:14.84 +19:42:22.4: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461267.9144,13.56,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260815.4144 13.56CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 15.4144 2461267.9144 13.98 06:06:50.61 +23:25:35.0
187.15610 1.34011 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.3" and 5.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.322 Phaeo -1 -1 1 14.3 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:06:50.61 +23:25:35.0: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:06:50.61 +23:25:35.0: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461267.9144,13.98,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260815.4144 13.98CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 15.4144 2461267.9144 12.97 06:40:49.35 +25:47:36.0
188.62291 9.28282 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 6.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.111 Ate -2 0 2 13.4 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:40:49.35 +25:47:36.0: 15.55 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:40:49.35 +25:47:36.0: 15.28 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.40 +/- 0.17
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461267.9144,12.97,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260815.4144 12.97CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.61760534 18.01.2026 02:49:11.101 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
First image: 2461058.61760534 18.01.2026 02:49:11.101 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Last image: 2461267.91473772 15.08.2026 09:57:03.339 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050345_TTUQ1b1x1_399710_HHKGN6uw/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 7
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.79
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 8 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 27696
Objects passed selection criteria: 27633
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 20895.2
Average stars matched: 19762.2 (94.5777 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 252236 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Aug 15 05:06:39 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.61760534 18.01.2026 02:49:11.101 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
First image: 2461058.61760534 18.01.2026 02:49:11.101 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Last image: 2461267.91473772 15.08.2026 09:57:03.339 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050345_TTUQ1b1x1_399710_HHKGN6uw/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 231
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.47
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 81 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 178235
Objects passed selection criteria: 177901
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 145372
Average stars matched: 140941 (96.9523 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 642752 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Aug 15 05:09:58 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050345_TTUQ1b1x1_399710_HHKGN6uw/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-56-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050345_TTUQ1b1x1_399710_HHKGN6uw/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050345_TTUQ1b1x1_399710_HHKGN6uw/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-56-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050345_TTUQ1b1x1_399710_HHKGN6uw/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461267.91410082
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-56-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Image size: 941.8'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:27:40.095 +22:00:29.68 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-56-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-56-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits
Image size: 945.2'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:27:51.566 +21:58:37.02 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:27:40.095 +22:00:29.68
Second-epoch image center 06:27:51.566 +21:58:37.02
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0543 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits
Image size: 945.1'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:27:50.568 +21:58:05.21 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:27:40.095 +22:00:29.68
Second-epoch image center 06:27:50.568 +21:58:05.21
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0570 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 06:27:51.566 +21:58:37.02
Second-epoch second image center 06:27:50.568 +21:58:05.21
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00964 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits &> /tmp/tmp.q7peUoXnAD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wdGvo2vtAU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050345_TTUQ1b1x1_399710_HHKGN6uw/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-56-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits &> /tmp/tmp.z4dD2U8sus
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050345_TTUQ1b1x1_399710_HHKGN6uw/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-56-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050345_TTUQ1b1x1_399710_HHKGN6uw/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xxoPrO8voZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050345_TTUQ1b1x1_399710_HHKGN6uw/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits and wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits and wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits and wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 29338 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 87.9455 to 105.5063 deg, Dec +16.3282 to +27.3630 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 87.9455 to 105.5063 deg, Dec 16.3282 to 27.3630 deg
Loaded 19945 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 14221 out of 15960 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 15960 out of 29338 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.881900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.881900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.79
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.09
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.09
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 29338 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 87.9455 to 105.5063 deg, Dec +16.3282 to +27.3630 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 87.9455 to 105.5063 deg, Dec 16.3282 to 27.3630 deg
Loaded 19945 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 14221 out of 15960 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 15960 out of 29338 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 31529 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 88.2224 to 105.7491 deg, Dec +16.5172 to +27.2358 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 88.2224 to 105.7491 deg, Dec 16.5172 to 27.2358 deg
Loaded 19341 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 14457 out of 15956 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 15956 out of 31529 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits (aperture=6.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 6 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
2.5 pix Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
2.3 pix fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-56-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits
2.3 pix fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
15.1 mag. Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-56-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.0 (SNR ) 11.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.q7peUoXnAD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050345_TTUQ1b1x1_399710_HHKGN6uw/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3278, bad_region=0, passed=29338
Got 29338 stars (including 26023 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29338 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4877 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4817 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4818 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4817 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29338 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4876 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4819 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29338 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4819 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29338 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 4819 stars left (next iteration limit 5298)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits N_match=4819 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.320 n_q1=1143 n_q2=1240 n_q3=1197 n_q4=1239 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.175
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -region wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.wdGvo2vtAU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050345_TTUQ1b1x1_399710_HHKGN6uw/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3030, bad_region=0, passed=31529
Got 31529 stars (including 28473 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31529 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4874 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4815 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4816 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4815 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31529 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4872 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4817 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31529 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4816 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31529 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Excluding outliers - 4816 stars left (next iteration limit 5296)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits N_match=4816 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.530 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.684 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.485 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.619 n_q1=1184 n_q2=1326 n_q3=1090 n_q4=1216 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.289
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits -region wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.z4dD2U8sus (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050345_TTUQ1b1x1_399710_HHKGN6uw/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050345_TTUQ1b1x1_399710_HHKGN6uw/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-56-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050345_TTUQ1b1x1_399710_HHKGN6uw/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-56-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050345_TTUQ1b1x1_399710_HHKGN6uw/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-56-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050345_TTUQ1b1x1_399710_HHKGN6uw/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-56-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050345_TTUQ1b1x1_399710_HHKGN6uw/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-56-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050345_TTUQ1b1x1_399710_HHKGN6uw/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-56-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-56-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-56-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-56-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-56-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-56-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-56-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-56-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050345_TTUQ1b1x1_399710_HHKGN6uw/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-56-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-56-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=732, bad_region=0, passed=11551
Got 11551 stars (including 10809 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-56-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11551 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013128 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010502 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4852 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4790 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4792 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4790 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11551 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4855 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4793 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11551 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4793 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11551 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 4793 stars left (next iteration limit 5269)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4793 robust_rms=7.271 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.495 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4793 robust_rms=0.513 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.799 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4793 robust_rms=0.375 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.461 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4793 robust_rms_before=1.625 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.418 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.375 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.505 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.461
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.505 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-56-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits N_match=4793 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.430 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.402 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.517 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.406 n_q1=1390 n_q2=855 n_q3=1530 n_q4=1018 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.204
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-56-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-56-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050345_TTUQ1b1x1_399710_HHKGN6uw/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-56-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-56-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-56-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.xxoPrO8voZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050345_TTUQ1b1x1_399710_HHKGN6uw/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050345_TTUQ1b1x1_399710_HHKGN6uw/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050345_TTUQ1b1x1_399710_HHKGN6uw/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050345_TTUQ1b1x1_399710_HHKGN6uw/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050345_TTUQ1b1x1_399710_HHKGN6uw/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050345_TTUQ1b1x1_399710_HHKGN6uw/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050345_TTUQ1b1x1_399710_HHKGN6uw/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050345_TTUQ1b1x1_399710_HHKGN6uw/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=707, bad_region=0, passed=11644
Got 11644 stars (including 10927 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11644 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013126 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010501 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4854 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4786 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4788 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4786 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11644 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4858 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4789 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11644 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4789 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11644 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 4789 stars left (next iteration limit 5264)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4789 robust_rms=7.165 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=14.121 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4789 robust_rms=0.551 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.827 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4789 robust_rms=0.397 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.485 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4789 robust_rms_before=1.485 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.429 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.397 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.514 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.485
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.514 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits N_match=4789 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.445 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.431 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.500 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.398 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.456 n_q1=1393 n_q2=860 n_q3=1527 n_q4=1009 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.123
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050345_TTUQ1b1x1_399710_HHKGN6uw/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-56-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-56-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-56-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits sigma_overall=0.370 worst_q_ratio=1.175
ref2=Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits sigma_overall=0.530 worst_q_ratio=1.289
new1=fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-56-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits sigma_overall=0.430 worst_q_ratio=1.204
new2=fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits sigma_overall=0.445 worst_q_ratio=1.123
reference average sigma_overall=0.45 worst_q_ratio=1.232
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_astrometric_residuals.png (4819 matched stars from wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041_astrometric_residuals.png (4816 matched stars from wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.51 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-56-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398_astrometric_residuals.png (4793 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-56-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.39 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399_astrometric_residuals.png (4789 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.40 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-56-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-56-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050345_TTUQ1b1x1_399710_HHKGN6uw/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-56-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050345_TTUQ1b1x1_399710_HHKGN6uw/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:02:49.99 +22:23:51.5: 15.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:18:29.71 +22:52:51.2: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:43:36.92 +17:49:48.6: 10.35 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:18:29.71 +22:52:51.2: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:02:49.99 +22:23:51.5: 15.55 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:43:36.92 +17:49:48.6: 10.41 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.38 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:43:36.92 +17:49:48.6: ref_mag=10.38 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.8595 delta=-0.48 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out34180.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out34397.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 44s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 5s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34165_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 34165_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34167_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
Preparing report for the candidate 34167_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34180_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
Preparing report for the candidate 34180_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34288_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 34288_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:03.65 +23:20:13.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34397_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
Preparing report for the candidate 34397_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34487_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 34487_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:56:29.95 +20:04:39.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 49s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
06:02:49.99 +22:23:51.5
06:18:29.71 +22:52:51.2
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050345_TTUQ1b1x1_399710_HHKGN6uw/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-56-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050345_TTUQ1b1x1_399710_HHKGN6uw/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050345_TTUQ1b1x1_399710_HHKGN6uw/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-56-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050345_TTUQ1b1x1_399710_HHKGN6uw/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-56-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-56-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Image size: 941.8'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:27:40.095 +22:00:29.68 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-56-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-56-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits
Image size: 945.2'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:27:51.566 +21:58:37.02 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:27:40.095 +22:00:29.68
Second-epoch image center 06:27:51.566 +21:58:37.02
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0543 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits
Image size: 945.1'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:27:50.568 +21:58:05.21 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:27:40.095 +22:00:29.68
Second-epoch image center 06:27:50.568 +21:58:05.21
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0570 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 06:27:51.566 +21:58:37.02
Second-epoch second image center 06:27:50.568 +21:58:05.21
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00964 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits &> /tmp/tmp.schu5FMZTm
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NTIqAFqUq3
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050345_TTUQ1b1x1_399710_HHKGN6uw/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-56-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nxhUPVQXuq
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050345_TTUQ1b1x1_399710_HHKGN6uw/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-56-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050345_TTUQ1b1x1_399710_HHKGN6uw/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wq9OmDM0u5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050345_TTUQ1b1x1_399710_HHKGN6uw/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits and wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits and wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits and wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 206292 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 87.9318 to 105.5265 deg, Dec +16.3091 to +27.3656 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 87.9318 to 105.5265 deg, Dec 16.3091 to 27.3656 deg
Loaded 20018 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11191 out of 16872 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16872 out of 206292 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.736100
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.736100
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.47
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.27
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.27
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 206292 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 87.9318 to 105.5265 deg, Dec +16.3091 to +27.3656 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 87.9318 to 105.5265 deg, Dec 16.3091 to 27.3656 deg
Loaded 20018 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11191 out of 16872 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16872 out of 206292 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 188638 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 88.2221 to 105.7490 deg, Dec +16.4980 to +27.2397 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 88.2221 to 105.7490 deg, Dec 16.4980 to 27.2397 deg
Loaded 19379 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11515 out of 16583 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16583 out of 188638 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits (aperture=5.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 211 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
2.4 pix Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
2.3 pix fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-56-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits
2.3 pix fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
15.2 mag. Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-56-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 13.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.schu5FMZTm (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050345_TTUQ1b1x1_399710_HHKGN6uw/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=47, blended=31903, bad_region=2, passed=206245
Got 206245 stars (including 174023 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 206245 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4833 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4792 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 206245 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4832 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 206245 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 206245 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 4791 stars left (next iteration limit 5270)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits N_match=4791 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.422 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.296 n_q1=1106 n_q2=1277 n_q3=1178 n_q4=1230 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.183
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -region wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.NTIqAFqUq3 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050345_TTUQ1b1x1_399710_HHKGN6uw/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=44, blended=29566, bad_region=0, passed=188594
Got 188594 stars (including 158851 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 188594 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4841 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4796 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4797 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4796 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 188594 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4840 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4797 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 188594 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4797 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 188594 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Excluding outliers - 4797 stars left (next iteration limit 5275)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits N_match=4797 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.514 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.647 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.512 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.569 n_q1=1146 n_q2=1371 n_q3=1051 n_q4=1229 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.258
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits -region wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.nxhUPVQXuq (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050345_TTUQ1b1x1_399710_HHKGN6uw/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050345_TTUQ1b1x1_399710_HHKGN6uw/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-56-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050345_TTUQ1b1x1_399710_HHKGN6uw/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-56-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050345_TTUQ1b1x1_399710_HHKGN6uw/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-56-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050345_TTUQ1b1x1_399710_HHKGN6uw/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-56-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050345_TTUQ1b1x1_399710_HHKGN6uw/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-56-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050345_TTUQ1b1x1_399710_HHKGN6uw/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-56-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-56-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-56-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-56-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-56-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-56-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-56-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-56-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050345_TTUQ1b1x1_399710_HHKGN6uw/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-56-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-56-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=6058, bad_region=12, passed=94244
Got 94244 stars (including 88036 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-56-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 94244 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013128 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010502 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4844 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4786 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4788 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4785 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 94244 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4847 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4790 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 94244 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4790 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 94244 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 4790 stars left (next iteration limit 5263)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-56-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4790 robust_rms=7.380 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.859 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4790 robust_rms=0.507 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.801 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4790 robust_rms=0.371 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.461 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4790 robust_rms_before=1.615 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.424 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.371 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.487 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.461
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.487 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-56-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits N_match=4790 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.418 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.490 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.402 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.405 n_q1=1383 n_q2=842 n_q3=1510 n_q4=1055 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.174
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-56-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-56-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050345_TTUQ1b1x1_399710_HHKGN6uw/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-56-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-56-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-56-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.wq9OmDM0u5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050345_TTUQ1b1x1_399710_HHKGN6uw/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050345_TTUQ1b1x1_399710_HHKGN6uw/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050345_TTUQ1b1x1_399710_HHKGN6uw/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050345_TTUQ1b1x1_399710_HHKGN6uw/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050345_TTUQ1b1x1_399710_HHKGN6uw/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050345_TTUQ1b1x1_399710_HHKGN6uw/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050345_TTUQ1b1x1_399710_HHKGN6uw/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050345_TTUQ1b1x1_399710_HHKGN6uw/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=6254, bad_region=13, passed=95508
Got 95508 stars (including 89096 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 95508 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013126 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010501 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4846 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4787 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4790 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4787 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 95508 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4850 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4788 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 95508 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4788 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 95508 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 4788 stars left (next iteration limit 5265)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4788 robust_rms=7.260 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=14.053 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4788 robust_rms=0.552 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.791 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4788 robust_rms=0.393 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.484 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4788 robust_rms_before=1.474 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.419 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.393 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.479 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.484
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.479 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits N_match=4788 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.426 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.500 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.431 n_q1=1379 n_q2=846 n_q3=1500 n_q4=1063 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.147
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050345_TTUQ1b1x1_399710_HHKGN6uw/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-56-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050345_TTUQ1b1x1_399710_HHKGN6uw/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-56-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0398.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050345_TTUQ1b1x1_399710_HHKGN6uw/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:20:33.03 +23:53:49.4: 14.14 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:07:04.44 +22:24:42.8: 13.81 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:23:09.41 +21:29:19.0: 13.92 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:19:39.86 +24:14:22.3: 13.86 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:23:06.09 +23:38:44.3: 13.58 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:30:36.72 +26:28:29.4: 13.29 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:03:20.46 +22:13:12.0: 13.72 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:19:55.75 +24:04:29.1: 13.40 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:20:33.03 +23:53:49.4: 14.10 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:07:04.44 +22:24:42.8: 13.76 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:23:09.41 +21:29:19.0: 13.74 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:23:06.09 +23:38:44.3: 13.29 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:19:39.86 +24:14:22.3: 13.88 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.12 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:20:33.03 +23:53:49.4: ref_mag=14.12 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8874 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:07:04.44 +22:24:42.8: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9364 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:19:39.86 +24:14:22.3: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8079 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:23:06.09 +23:38:44.3: ref_mag=13.40 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4843 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:23:09.41 +21:29:19.0: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8003 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:30:36.72 +26:28:29.4: 13.22 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.26 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:30:36.72 +26:28:29.4: ref_mag=13.26 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4836 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:19:55.75 +24:04:29.1: 13.21 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:03:20.46 +22:13:12.0: 13.72 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.30 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:19:55.75 +24:04:29.1: ref_mag=13.30 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5214 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.72 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:03:20.46 +22:13:12.0: ref_mag=13.72 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8389 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:07:56.24 +24:39:01.7: 13.59 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:35:04.57 +19:46:49.2: 12.83 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:14:37.82 +20:08:58.5: 13.55 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:08:37.21 +25:51:06.7: 13.48 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:35:04.57 +19:46:49.2: 12.73 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:07:56.24 +24:39:01.7: 13.50 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:58:53.95 +26:11:06.1: 12.94 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.78 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:07:56.24 +24:39:01.7: ref_mag=13.54 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6961 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:35:04.57 +19:46:49.2: ref_mag=12.78 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.0059 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:22:43.04 +19:05:53.2: 13.07 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:40:02.67 +20:31:09.3: 12.83 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:01:12.77 +19:59:10.0: 13.63 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:58:01.49 +18:43:36.6: 13.39 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:14:37.82 +20:08:58.5: 13.55 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:08:37.21 +25:51:06.7: 13.42 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.55 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:14:37.82 +20:08:58.5: ref_mag=13.55 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3984 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.45 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:08:37.21 +25:51:06.7: ref_mag=13.45 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4652 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:58:53.95 +26:11:06.1: 12.89 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.91 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:58:53.95 +26:11:06.1: ref_mag=12.91 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8891 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:40:02.67 +20:31:09.3: 12.78 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:22:43.04 +19:05:53.2: 12.99 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:01:12.77 +19:59:10.0: 13.64 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.80 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.03 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 05:58:01.49 +18:43:36.6: 12.96 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.63 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:40:02.67 +20:31:09.3: ref_mag=12.80 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9090 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:22:43.04 +19:05:53.2: ref_mag=13.03 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1018 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:01:12.77 +19:59:10.0: ref_mag=13.63 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4914 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.12 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:58:01.49 +18:43:36.6: ref_mag=13.12 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4576 delta=-0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:42:31.23 +20:33:49.2: 12.66 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:01:59.40 +20:16:21.3: 13.07 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:25:26.93 +20:08:54.4: 12.99 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:55:35.56 +20:26:52.7: 13.02 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:42:31.23 +20:33:49.2: 12.59 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.62 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:42:31.23 +20:33:49.2: ref_mag=12.62 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7261 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:46:13.54 +19:30:28.3: 12.27 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:01:59.40 +20:16:21.3: 12.99 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.03 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:27:39.64 +22:39:54.1: 12.64 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:01:59.40 +20:16:21.3: ref_mag=13.03 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1205 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:25:26.93 +20:08:54.4: 12.87 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.92 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:25:26.93 +20:08:54.4: ref_mag=12.92 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9987 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 05:55:35.56 +20:26:52.7: 12.99 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.00 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:55:35.56 +20:26:52.7: ref_mag=13.00 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0509 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:46:13.54 +19:30:28.3: 12.28 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:27:39.64 +22:39:54.1: 12.52 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.28 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:46:13.54 +19:30:28.3: ref_mag=12.28 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4790 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.58 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:27:39.64 +22:39:54.1: ref_mag=12.58 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7799 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:59:45.37 +23:46:06.5: 12.82 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:43:52.41 +23:55:56.4: 12.16 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:07:27.72 +24:05:44.6: 12.52 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 05:59:45.37 +23:46:06.5: 12.84 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.83 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:59:45.37 +23:46:06.5: ref_mag=12.83 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0558 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:47:49.53 +23:20:55.2: 11.83 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:43:52.41 +23:55:56.4: 12.10 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.13 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:43:52.41 +23:55:56.4: ref_mag=12.13 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2061 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:07:27.72 +24:05:44.6: 12.32 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.39 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:07:27.72 +24:05:44.6: ref_mag=12.39 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4293 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:47:49.53 +23:20:55.2: 11.68 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.75 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:47:49.53 +23:20:55.2: ref_mag=11.75 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7729 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:28:55.62 +20:16:16.8: 11.62 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:24:57.42 +24:37:07.6: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:28:55.62 +20:16:16.8: 11.57 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.60 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:28:55.62 +20:16:16.8: ref_mag=11.60 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4010 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:55:24.05 +20:11:39.5: 11.77 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:24:57.42 +24:37:07.6: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:55:24.05 +20:11:39.5: 11.72 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.74 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:55:24.05 +20:11:39.5: ref_mag=11.74 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0285 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:38:49.45 +21:52:44.7: 12.45 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:20:40.95 +18:02:28.1: 12.88 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:47:05.14 +17:07:46.4: 12.32 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:38:49.45 +21:52:44.7: 12.30 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.36 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:38:49.45 +21:52:44.7: ref_mag=12.36 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4803 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:12:09.47 +19:42:07.7: 15.68 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:20:40.95 +18:02:28.1: 12.78 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.82 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:47:05.14 +17:07:46.4: 12.19 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:20:40.95 +18:02:28.1: ref_mag=12.82 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7226 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.25 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:47:05.14 +17:07:46.4: ref_mag=12.25 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3707 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:12:09.47 +19:42:07.7: 15.23 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.37 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:12:09.47 +19:42:07.7: ref_mag=15.37 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=12.9003 delta=2.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:29:14.98 +17:30:18.2: 12.66 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:58:47.83 +21:14:30.4: 13.34 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:43:47.71 +22:44:54.9: 12.74 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:29:14.59 +22:51:04.4: 13.01 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:29:14.98 +17:30:18.2: 12.59 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.62 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:29:14.98 +17:30:18.2: ref_mag=12.62 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7042 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 05:58:47.83 +21:14:30.4: 13.19 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:58:47.83 +21:14:30.4: ref_mag=13.25 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2522 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:43:47.71 +22:44:54.9: 12.63 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.68 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:43:47.71 +22:44:54.9: ref_mag=12.68 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7050 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:29:14.59 +22:51:04.4: 12.97 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.99 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:29:14.59 +22:51:04.4: ref_mag=12.99 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8775 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:01:42.98 +17:35:20.5: 12.93 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:27:12.30 +26:49:28.9: 13.31 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:16:49.72 +25:52:15.0: 13.06 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:39:23.47 +26:08:47.7: 12.90 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:17:53.65 +19:26:20.5: 13.32 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:01:42.98 +17:35:20.5: 13.21 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.03 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:01:42.98 +17:35:20.5: ref_mag=13.03 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1559 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:27:12.30 +26:49:28.9: 13.24 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.28 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:27:12.30 +26:49:28.9: ref_mag=13.28 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1310 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:16:49.72 +25:52:15.0: 13.17 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:19:48.22 +24:59:24.4: 13.30 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.11 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:16:49.72 +25:52:15.0: ref_mag=13.11 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1444 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:39:23.47 +26:08:47.7: 12.88 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.89 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:39:23.47 +26:08:47.7: ref_mag=12.89 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9374 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:17:53.65 +19:26:20.5: 13.34 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:17:53.65 +19:26:20.5: ref_mag=13.33 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2159 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:19:48.22 +24:59:24.4: 13.29 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.30 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:19:48.22 +24:59:24.4: ref_mag=13.30 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2187 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:27:25.27 +24:31:56.2: 13.32 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:12:44.45 +26:45:52.0: 13.54 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:01:09.06 +21:04:50.7: 13.39 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:08:36.49 +25:38:56.4: 13.46 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:27:25.27 +24:31:56.2: 13.27 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.29 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:27:25.27 +24:31:56.2: ref_mag=13.29 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2830 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:12:44.45 +26:45:52.0: 13.63 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:40:54.01 +22:50:53.8: 13.14 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:12:44.45 +26:45:52.0: ref_mag=13.58 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4869 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:01:09.06 +21:04:50.7: 13.76 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.51 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:01:09.06 +21:04:50.7: ref_mag=13.51 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5238 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:08:36.49 +25:38:56.4: 13.55 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.49 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:08:36.49 +25:38:56.4: ref_mag=13.49 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4945 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:40:54.01 +22:50:53.8: 12.98 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:22:18.04 +25:35:55.9: 13.30 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.05 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:40:54.01 +22:50:53.8: ref_mag=13.05 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9783 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:35:34.43 +19:01:10.7: 12.85 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:42:29.24 +24:06:37.3: 13.39 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:22:18.04 +25:35:55.9: 13.33 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.32 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:22:18.04 +25:35:55.9: ref_mag=13.32 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3827 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:35:34.43 +19:01:10.7: 12.74 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.80 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:35:34.43 +19:01:10.7: ref_mag=12.80 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0144 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:27:24.61 +19:28:18.7: 13.24 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:42:29.24 +24:06:37.3: 13.18 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.27 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:42:29.24 +24:06:37.3: ref_mag=13.27 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0720 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:24:58.02 +24:09:01.1: 13.35 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:41:45.26 +21:11:44.0: 13.02 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:27:24.61 +19:28:18.7: 13.08 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.15 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:27:24.61 +19:28:18.7: ref_mag=13.15 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1780 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:39:50.55 +19:18:44.0: 13.00 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:24:58.02 +24:09:01.1: 13.23 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.29 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:24:58.02 +24:09:01.1: ref_mag=13.29 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2689 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:43:46.38 +22:44:45.2: 12.99 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:41:45.26 +21:11:44.0: 13.03 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.02 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:41:45.26 +21:11:44.0: ref_mag=13.02 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0903 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:18:19.74 +26:51:26.3: 13.54 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:18:21.54 +23:34:17.6: 13.92 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:39:50.55 +19:18:44.0: 12.91 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.95 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:39:50.55 +19:18:44.0: ref_mag=12.95 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0242 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:43:46.38 +22:44:45.2: 12.89 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.94 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:43:46.38 +22:44:45.2: ref_mag=12.94 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0793 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:18:19.74 +26:51:26.3: 13.43 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:28:54.04 +20:15:38.9: 13.40 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.48 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:18:19.74 +26:51:26.3: ref_mag=13.48 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5462 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:18:21.54 +23:34:17.6: 13.89 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:18:21.54 +23:34:17.6: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.6362 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:28:54.04 +20:15:38.9: 13.24 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.31 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:28:54.04 +20:15:38.9: ref_mag=13.31 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3663 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:12:06.85 +22:11:42.4: 14.00 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:37:28.82 +18:57:32.1: 13.34 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:17:27.22 +23:46:34.9: 13.82 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:12:06.85 +22:11:42.4: 13.90 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:12:06.85 +22:11:42.4: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.6577 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:37:28.82 +18:57:32.1: 13.33 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:37:28.82 +18:57:32.1: ref_mag=13.33 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3121 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:28:04.00 +23:40:49.3: 13.69 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:22:10.99 +19:42:31.3: 13.13 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:21:59.17 +20:07:55.6: 13.35 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:17:27.22 +23:46:34.9: 13.81 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:17:27.22 +23:46:34.9: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7773 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:28:04.00 +23:40:49.3: 13.62 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.65 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:28:04.00 +23:40:49.3: ref_mag=13.65 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5661 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:22:10.99 +19:42:31.3: 13.28 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.19 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:22:10.99 +19:42:31.3: ref_mag=13.19 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3893 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:12:49.53 +22:46:48.7: 14.00 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:21:59.17 +20:07:55.6: 13.35 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.35 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:21:59.17 +20:07:55.6: ref_mag=13.35 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5309 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:21:08.07 +18:47:10.4: 13.60 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:31:14.84 +19:42:22.4: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:06:50.61 +23:25:35.0: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:12:49.53 +22:46:48.7: 14.00 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.00 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:12:49.53 +22:46:48.7: ref_mag=14.00 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9888 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:21:08.07 +18:47:10.4: 13.62 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.61 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:21:08.07 +18:47:10.4: ref_mag=13.61 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6552 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:31:14.84 +19:42:22.4: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:06:50.61 +23:25:35.0: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:40:49.35 +25:47:36.0: 15.55 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:40:49.35 +25:47:36.0: 15.28 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.40 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:40:49.35 +25:47:36.0: ref_mag=15.40 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=12.9695 delta=2.43 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out179666.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out231479.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out232154.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out233340.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out233363.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 14s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 5s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230757_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 230757_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230758_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 230758_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230764_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 230764_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230774_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 230774_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230781_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 230781_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230782_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 230782_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:31:24.50 +26:26:48.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230789_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 230789_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:27:48.15 +19:27:52.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230793_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 230793_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:16:06.06 +19:18:28.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230795_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 230795_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:41:10.81 +22:58:36.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230802_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 230802_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:12.71 +21:35:33.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230812_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 230812_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230817_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 230817_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230824_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 230824_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:10:56.72 +20:11:22.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230828_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 230828_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230832_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 230832_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:19:15.92 +20:38:46.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230833_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 230833_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:23:38.03 +21:00:41.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230835_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 230835_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:40:08.52 +26:15:43.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230837_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 230837_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230838_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 230838_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230845_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 230845_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230846_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 230846_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:22.46 +20:10:55.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230847_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 230847_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:31:14.90 +22:47:18.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230848_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 230848_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:25:09.02 +20:47:28.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230849_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 230849_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230850_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 230850_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230852_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 230852_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230864_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 230864_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230868_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 230868_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230869_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 230869_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:52.83 +18:21:05.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230871_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 230871_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230873_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 230873_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:17:49.87 +21:47:15.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230874_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 230874_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:16:22.60 +23:23:32.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230875_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 230875_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:08:01.41 +24:25:11.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230878_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 230878_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:55.31 +25:24:39.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230882_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 230882_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:27.33 +19:57:15.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230888_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 230888_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:19.31 +22:46:54.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230889_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 230889_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:11.54 +22:11:11.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230890_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 230890_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230891_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 230891_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:02:48.10 +26:06:14.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230893_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 230893_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230896_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 230896_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230900_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 230900_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:38.10 +20:44:20.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230901_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 230901_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:16:44.00 +23:55:57.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230902_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 230902_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:23:45.86 +22:01:38.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230904_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 230904_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:15:18.94 +20:13:16.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230905_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 230905_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:24.72 +22:16:44.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230907_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 230907_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:28.08 +20:45:30.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230908_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 230908_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230909_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 230909_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:40.44 +18:39:48.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230910_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 230910_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:49.78 +23:53:02.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230911_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 230911_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230912_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 230912_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:07.37 +23:24:42.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230914_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 230914_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230916_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 230916_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:25:53.23 +17:30:29.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230917_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 230917_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:10.37 +23:38:30.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230919_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 230919_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:57:18.67 +20:40:43.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230920_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 230920_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:49.51 +23:57:21.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230922_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 230922_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:05.52 +24:13:07.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230923_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 230923_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230924_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 230924_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:13:15.19 +20:38:19.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230926_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 230926_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:13.17 +23:55:08.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230930_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 230930_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:59.32 +17:48:22.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230931_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 230931_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:07:00.60 +18:21:56.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230932_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 230932_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:03.05 +25:11:39.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230939_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 230939_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230941_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 230941_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230942_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 230942_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:05:17.82 +18:59:19.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230943_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 230943_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230944_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 230944_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:53.30 +17:47:32.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230946_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 230946_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:05.44 +26:33:21.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230947_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 230947_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:18:51.56 +18:25:30.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230951_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 230951_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:22.62 +25:14:08.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230953_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
Preparing report for the candidate 230953_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230967_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 230967_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:02:50.00 +22:23:51.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231113_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 231113_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:14:36.57 +22:29:48.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231114_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 231114_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:14:39.84 +22:30:00.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231186_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 231186_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:18:29.71 +22:52:51.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231211_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 231211_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:51.67 +24:02:08.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231288_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 231288_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231348_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 231348_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:29:01.50 +20:10:36.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231388_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 231388_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:15:04.29 +22:32:08.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231392_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 231392_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:01.92 +25:55:16.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231426_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 231426_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:14.37 +23:18:08.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231461_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 231461_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:42:14.83 +25:21:40.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231479_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
Preparing report for the candidate 231479_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231555_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 231555_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:42:18.79 +17:38:00.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231563_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 231563_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:42:15.66 +18:46:39.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231628_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 231628_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:33.12 +22:53:15.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231704_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 231704_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:12:01.21 +21:52:18.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231731_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 231731_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:14:49.71 +22:33:18.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231782_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 231782_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231783_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 231783_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:18:57.78 +23:16:59.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231792_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 231792_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:57:51.93 +25:58:17.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231797_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 231797_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:38.98 +24:26:23.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231841_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 231841_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:21.75 +18:14:27.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231866_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 231866_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:11.71 +23:13:21.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231931_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 231931_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:58.22 +23:15:21.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231982_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 231982_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:02:23.21 +26:25:59.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232030_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 232030_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232068_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 232068_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232081_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 232081_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:51.98 +18:15:09.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232082_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 232082_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232095_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 232095_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:27.72 +24:26:16.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232099_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 232099_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:55.80 +26:22:14.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232139_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 232139_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:39:37.52 +24:36:51.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232152_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 232152_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:10:54.56 +20:35:48.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232154_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
Preparing report for the candidate 232154_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232160_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 232160_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:14:47.60 +19:10:51.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232166_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 232166_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:21.55 +23:37:16.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232168_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 232168_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:20:42.97 +18:02:30.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232176_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 232176_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:31:02.28 +16:57:22.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232190_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 232190_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232197_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 232197_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232205_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 232205_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:48.35 +22:42:26.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232212_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 232212_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232218_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 232218_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:18:45.96 +21:10:54.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232220_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 232220_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:13:21.00 +18:34:41.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232243_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 232243_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232245_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 232245_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:56:02.04 +19:21:48.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232255_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 232255_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:08:42.33 +20:26:17.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232267_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 232267_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:37:45.94 +22:43:12.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232268_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 232268_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:22.73 +25:23:46.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232271_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 232271_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:40.02 +25:01:55.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232280_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 232280_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:02:21.42 +26:25:43.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232282_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 232282_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:10.06 +24:16:44.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232285_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 232285_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:10.60 +22:27:22.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232295_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 232295_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:08:48.70 +23:32:30.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232296_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 232296_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:19:54.28 +23:17:12.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232309_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 232309_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:09.56 +22:19:02.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232316_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 232316_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:32:39.65 +23:08:32.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232330_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 232330_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:33.34 +18:11:15.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232351_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 232351_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:57:12.69 +17:39:09.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232357_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 232357_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232358_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 232358_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:38.44 +23:06:03.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232366_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 232366_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:35:55.35 +17:12:22.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232396_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 232396_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232403_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 232403_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232407_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 232407_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:54.07 +23:37:26.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232413_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 232413_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232415_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 232415_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:12.74 +22:43:40.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232425_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 232425_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232461_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 232461_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:21.54 +20:55:43.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232480_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 232480_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232487_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 232487_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:01.73 +23:19:33.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232491_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 232491_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:06:59.38 +19:27:02.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232503_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 232503_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:31:54.26 +22:10:39.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232543_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 232543_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:18.47 +22:44:28.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232611_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 232611_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232615_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 232615_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232617_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 232617_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:15.17 +26:30:46.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232631_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 232631_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:16:12.35 +23:58:07.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232637_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 232637_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232644_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 232644_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232651_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 232651_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:13:25.69 +18:51:09.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232661_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 232661_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232666_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 232666_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:34:45.37 +19:25:52.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232690_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 232690_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232694_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 232694_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:13:32.14 +18:42:08.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232695_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 232695_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232704_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 232704_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232728_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 232728_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:29:01.39 +21:34:32.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232733_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 232733_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232746_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 232746_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:31:27.70 +17:26:20.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232760_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 232760_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232777_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 232777_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:35:53.33 +22:57:33.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232790_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 232790_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:29:16.30 +17:30:37.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232807_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 232807_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232810_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 232810_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232812_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 232812_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232831_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 232831_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:31:34.02 +16:51:10.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232862_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 232862_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232870_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 232870_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232900_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 232900_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:22:45.99 +17:35:45.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232902_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 232902_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232949_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 232949_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232964_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 232964_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:40:06.89 +25:18:59.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232992_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 232992_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233018_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 233018_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:23:18.80 +20:01:29.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233024_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 233024_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233049_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 233049_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:30:16.87 +21:41:59.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233050_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 233050_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:23.25 +19:13:54.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233062_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 233062_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233074_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 233074_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:31:56.34 +22:12:13.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233104_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 233104_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233121_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 233121_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:35:04.56 +24:56:46.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233135_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 233135_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:17:14.83 +18:55:35.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233144_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 233144_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:16:16.98 +19:37:12.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233164_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 233164_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:24.99 +25:54:39.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233179_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 233179_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233193_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 233193_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233199_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 233199_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233257_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 233257_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:21:25.07 +21:10:46.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233279_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 233279_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233282_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 233282_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:19:20.12 +18:51:17.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233310_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 233310_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:39:49.65 +19:53:15.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233330_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 233330_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233333_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 233333_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233340_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
Preparing report for the candidate 233340_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233363_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
Preparing report for the candidate 233363_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233369_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 233369_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:19:22.73 +20:26:47.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233402_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 233402_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101327_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 101327_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:23:10.83 +21:50:52.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70632_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 70632_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:26.16 +20:28:13.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 43809_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 43809_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:38:58.48 +19:09:04.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179666_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
Preparing report for the candidate 179666_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 220304_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 220304_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:57:32.55 +26:53:12.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61063_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 61063_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:30.70 +20:02:04.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29565_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 29565_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:19:43.64 +18:15:19.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110234_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 110234_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:56:11.15 +21:51:41.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160901_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 160901_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (33.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04998_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399
The candidate 04998_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-57-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0399 did not pass the final checks
