This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041345_TTUQ1b1x1_2714096_5t5lHmHf
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 15.3830* 04 12 28.82 +20 58 52.2 7.0 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461267.8830,6.96,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260815.3830 6.96CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 15.3830* 04 12 28.82 +20 58 52.4 7.1 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461267.8830,7.11,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260815.3830 7.11CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 15.3830 2461267.8830 12.96 03:19:05.66 +19:45:09.4
164.21148 -31.03792 galactic Ari Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 4.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.64 Angelina -1 -1 1 12.9 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:19:05.66 +19:45:09.4: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:19:05.66 +19:45:09.4: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 15.3830* 03 19 05.66 +19 45 09.4 13.0 U Ari 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461267.8830,12.96,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260815.3830 12.96CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 15.3830 2461267.8830 12.75 04:08:57.95 +23:55:06.7
170.59532 -20.16741 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 4.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.49 Pales 0 -0 0 13.0 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:08:57.95 +23:55:06.7: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:08:57.95 +23:55:06.7: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 15.3830* 04 08 57.95 +23 55 06.7 12.8 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461267.8830,12.75,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260815.3830 12.75CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 15.3830 2461267.8830 13.67 04:04:43.40 +25:19:29.1
168.80857 -19.86956 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.0" and 4.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.224 Oceana -3 -1 3 14.1 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:04:43.40 +25:19:29.1: 15.55 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:04:43.40 +25:19:29.1: 15.41 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.48 +/- 0.17
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 15.3830* 04 04 43.40 +25 19 29.1 13.7 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461267.8830,13.67,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260815.3830 13.67CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 15.3830 2461267.8830 13.74 03:43:55.73 +20:30:56.3
168.68405 -26.65322 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 4.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.83 Beatrix 2 1 2 13.9 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:43:55.73 +20:30:56.3: 16.26 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:43:55.73 +20:30:56.3: 16.34 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 15.3830* 03 43 55.73 +20 30 56.3 13.7 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461267.8830,13.74,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260815.3830 13.74CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 15.3830 2461267.8830 13.98 03:36:43.12 +16:56:24.7
170.03275 -30.43396 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 4.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.62 Erato -1 -0 1 14.0 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:36:43.12 +16:56:24.7: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:36:43.12 +16:56:24.7: 16.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 15.3830* 03 36 43.12 +16 56 24.7 14.0 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461267.8830,13.98,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260815.3830 13.98CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 15.3830 2461267.8830 14.12 03:48:53.94 +22:38:34.7
168.01394 -24.30918 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.0" and 4.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.112 Iphigenia 0 -1 1 14.3 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:48:53.94 +22:38:34.7: 16.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:48:53.94 +22:38:34.7: 16.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 15.3830* 03 48 53.94 +22 38 34.7 14.1 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461267.8830,14.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260815.3830 14.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.67777097 09.01.2026 04:15:49.412 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
First image: 2461049.67777097 09.01.2026 04:15:49.412 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Last image: 2461267.88325914 15.08.2026 09:11:43.590 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041345_TTUQ1b1x1_2714096_5t5lHmHf/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 5
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.51
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 19 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 10911
Objects passed selection criteria: 10899
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 9957.75
Average stars matched: 9764.75 (98.0618 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 236632 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Aug 15 04:17:48 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.67777097 09.01.2026 04:15:49.412 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
First image: 2461049.67777097 09.01.2026 04:15:49.412 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Last image: 2461267.88325914 15.08.2026 09:11:43.590 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041345_TTUQ1b1x1_2714096_5t5lHmHf/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 156
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.22
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 31 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 66537
Objects passed selection criteria: 66373
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 57487.5
Average stars matched: 55743.8 (96.9667 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 286164 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Aug 15 04:19:30 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041345_TTUQ1b1x1_2714096_5t5lHmHf/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-10-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041345_TTUQ1b1x1_2714096_5t5lHmHf/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041345_TTUQ1b1x1_2714096_5t5lHmHf/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-10-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041345_TTUQ1b1x1_2714096_5t5lHmHf/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461267.88273078
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-10-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:33.276 +21:59:52.28 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-10-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-10-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:41.735 +21:59:17.91 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:41:33.276 +21:59:52.28
Second-epoch image center 03:41:41.735 +21:59:17.91
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0340 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:42.405 +21:58:54.27 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:41:33.276 +21:59:52.28
Second-epoch image center 03:41:42.405 +21:58:54.27
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0388 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 03:41:41.735 +21:59:17.91
Second-epoch second image center 03:41:42.405 +21:58:54.27
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00706 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits &> /tmp/tmp.g9ws9vwynB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ztzpOTPtEE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041345_TTUQ1b1x1_2714096_5t5lHmHf/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-10-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits &> /tmp/tmp.CulGNTUqOy
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041345_TTUQ1b1x1_2714096_5t5lHmHf/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-10-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041345_TTUQ1b1x1_2714096_5t5lHmHf/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits &> /tmp/tmp.sr7v5BHh5W
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041345_TTUQ1b1x1_2714096_5t5lHmHf/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 11324 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6706 to 64.2537 deg, Dec +16.5354 to +27.2942 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6706 to 64.2537 deg, Dec 16.5354 to 27.2942 deg
Loaded 6127 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4779 out of 5136 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5136 out of 11324 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.939900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.939900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.51
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.43
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.43
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 11324 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6706 to 64.2537 deg, Dec +16.5354 to +27.2942 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6706 to 64.2537 deg, Dec 16.5354 to 27.2942 deg
Loaded 6127 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4779 out of 5136 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5136 out of 11324 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 11315 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6502 to 64.2538 deg, Dec +16.5175 to +27.2929 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6502 to 64.2538 deg, Dec 16.5175 to 27.2929 deg
Loaded 6135 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4761 out of 5130 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5130 out of 11315 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 5 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
2.0 pix Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
3.0 pix fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-10-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits
3.0 pix fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
15.4 mag. Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-10-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 12.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.g9ws9vwynB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-15_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041345_TTUQ1b1x1_2714096_5t5lHmHf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=882, bad_region=0, passed=11324
Got 11324 stars (including 10422 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11324 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11324 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11324 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11324 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4923 stars left (next iteration limit 5415)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits N_match=4923 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.293 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.287 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.260 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.238 n_q1=1548 n_q2=1222 n_q3=1071 n_q4=1082 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.278
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits -region wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ztzpOTPtEE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-15_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041345_TTUQ1b1x1_2714096_5t5lHmHf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=893, bad_region=0, passed=11315
Got 11315 stars (including 10408 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11315 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11315 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11315 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11315 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4921 stars left (next iteration limit 5413)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits N_match=4921 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.308 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.282 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.236 n_q1=1546 n_q2=1221 n_q3=1073 n_q4=1081 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.338
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits -region wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.CulGNTUqOy (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-15_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041345_TTUQ1b1x1_2714096_5t5lHmHf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041345_TTUQ1b1x1_2714096_5t5lHmHf/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-10-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041345_TTUQ1b1x1_2714096_5t5lHmHf/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-10-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041345_TTUQ1b1x1_2714096_5t5lHmHf/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-10-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041345_TTUQ1b1x1_2714096_5t5lHmHf/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-10-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041345_TTUQ1b1x1_2714096_5t5lHmHf/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-10-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041345_TTUQ1b1x1_2714096_5t5lHmHf/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-10-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-10-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-10-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-10-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-10-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-10-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-10-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-10-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041345_TTUQ1b1x1_2714096_5t5lHmHf/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-10-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-10-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=426, bad_region=0, passed=8693
Got 8693 stars (including 8261 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-10-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8693 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4925 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4914 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8693 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8693 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8693 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4915 stars left (next iteration limit 5405)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4915 robust_rms=9.254 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.212 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4915 robust_rms=0.349 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.363 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4915 robust_rms=0.270 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.311 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4915 robust_rms_before=1.192 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.291 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.270 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.357 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.311
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-10-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-10-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:41.761 +21:59:16.54 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 8693 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-10-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-15_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041345_TTUQ1b1x1_2714096_5t5lHmHf/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2935046.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 1.192 -> 0.270 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-10-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits N_match=4915 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.282 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.278 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.258 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.284 n_q1=1101 n_q2=1009 n_q3=1265 n_q4=1540 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.155
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-10-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-10-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041345_TTUQ1b1x1_2714096_5t5lHmHf/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-10-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-10-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-10-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.sr7v5BHh5W (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-15_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041345_TTUQ1b1x1_2714096_5t5lHmHf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041345_TTUQ1b1x1_2714096_5t5lHmHf/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041345_TTUQ1b1x1_2714096_5t5lHmHf/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041345_TTUQ1b1x1_2714096_5t5lHmHf/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041345_TTUQ1b1x1_2714096_5t5lHmHf/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041345_TTUQ1b1x1_2714096_5t5lHmHf/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041345_TTUQ1b1x1_2714096_5t5lHmHf/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041345_TTUQ1b1x1_2714096_5t5lHmHf/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=420, bad_region=0, passed=8706
Got 8706 stars (including 8278 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8706 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4915 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8706 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8706 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8706 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4915 stars left (next iteration limit 5405)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4915 robust_rms=9.157 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.286 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4915 robust_rms=0.336 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.343 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4915 robust_rms=0.260 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.312 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4915 robust_rms_before=1.182 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.277 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.260 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.352 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.312
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:42.433 +21:58:52.91 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 8706 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-15_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041345_TTUQ1b1x1_2714096_5t5lHmHf/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2934357.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 1.182 -> 0.260 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits N_match=4915 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.270 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.278 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.246 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.263 n_q1=1107 n_q2=1009 n_q3=1262 n_q4=1537 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.211
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041345_TTUQ1b1x1_2714096_5t5lHmHf/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-10-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-10-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-10-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits sigma_overall=0.293 worst_q_ratio=1.278
ref2=Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits sigma_overall=0.308 worst_q_ratio=1.338
new1=fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-10-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits sigma_overall=0.282 worst_q_ratio=1.155
new2=fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits sigma_overall=0.270 worst_q_ratio=1.211
reference average sigma_overall=0.3005 worst_q_ratio=1.308
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_astrometric_residuals.png (4923 matched stars from wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_astrometric_residuals.png (4921 matched stars from wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-10-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0352_astrometric_residuals.png (4915 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-10-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.23 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353_astrometric_residuals.png (4915 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.22 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-10-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-10-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041345_TTUQ1b1x1_2714096_5t5lHmHf/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-10-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041345_TTUQ1b1x1_2714096_5t5lHmHf/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 2s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20579_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
Preparing report for the candidate 20579_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20641_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 20641_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:24:24.58 +24:42:55.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20720_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 20720_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:43:21.08 +18:01:20.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20727_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 20727_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:04:04.78 +25:42:46.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07061_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 07061_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:02:39.37 +21:03:59.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 3s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041345_TTUQ1b1x1_2714096_5t5lHmHf/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-10-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041345_TTUQ1b1x1_2714096_5t5lHmHf/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041345_TTUQ1b1x1_2714096_5t5lHmHf/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-10-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041345_TTUQ1b1x1_2714096_5t5lHmHf/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-10-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-10-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:33.276 +21:59:52.28 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-10-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-10-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:41.761 +21:59:16.54 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:41:33.276 +21:59:52.28
Second-epoch image center 03:41:41.761 +21:59:16.54
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0343 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:42.433 +21:58:52.91 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:41:33.276 +21:59:52.28
Second-epoch image center 03:41:42.433 +21:58:52.91
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0390 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 03:41:41.761 +21:59:16.54
Second-epoch second image center 03:41:42.433 +21:58:52.91
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00706 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits &> /tmp/tmp.X6bT0upTZo
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XxcHa3YySm
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041345_TTUQ1b1x1_2714096_5t5lHmHf/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-10-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0t9fMgU4wr
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041345_TTUQ1b1x1_2714096_5t5lHmHf/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-10-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041345_TTUQ1b1x1_2714096_5t5lHmHf/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3FxWOCJMbD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041345_TTUQ1b1x1_2714096_5t5lHmHf/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 71179 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6551 to 64.2537 deg, Dec +16.4774 to +27.2939 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6551 to 64.2537 deg, Dec 16.4774 to 27.2939 deg
Loaded 6152 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4354 out of 5188 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5188 out of 71179 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.815850
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.815850
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.22
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.60
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.60
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 71179 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6551 to 64.2537 deg, Dec +16.4774 to +27.2939 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6551 to 64.2537 deg, Dec 16.4774 to 27.2939 deg
Loaded 6152 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4354 out of 5188 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5188 out of 71179 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 71492 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6502 to 64.2538 deg, Dec +16.4673 to +27.2929 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6502 to 64.2538 deg, Dec 16.4673 to 27.2929 deg
Loaded 6157 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4359 out of 5185 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5185 out of 71492 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 137 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
1.9 pix Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
2.8 pix fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-10-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits
2.8 pix fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
15.6 mag. Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-10-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 14.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.X6bT0upTZo (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-15_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041345_TTUQ1b1x1_2714096_5t5lHmHf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=24, blended=4312, bad_region=7, passed=71155
Got 71155 stars (including 66715 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 71155 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4932 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71155 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71155 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71155 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4932 stars left (next iteration limit 5425)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits N_match=4932 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.281 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.255 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.223 n_q1=1490 n_q2=1223 n_q3=1113 n_q4=1106 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.284
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits -region wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.XxcHa3YySm (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-15_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041345_TTUQ1b1x1_2714096_5t5lHmHf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=4374, bad_region=8, passed=71475
Got 71475 stars (including 66975 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 71475 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71475 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71475 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71475 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4928 stars left (next iteration limit 5420)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits N_match=4928 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.294 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.284 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.230 n_q1=1490 n_q2=1228 n_q3=1108 n_q4=1102 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.318
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits -region wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.0t9fMgU4wr (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-15_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041345_TTUQ1b1x1_2714096_5t5lHmHf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041345_TTUQ1b1x1_2714096_5t5lHmHf/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-10-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041345_TTUQ1b1x1_2714096_5t5lHmHf/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-10-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041345_TTUQ1b1x1_2714096_5t5lHmHf/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-10-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041345_TTUQ1b1x1_2714096_5t5lHmHf/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-10-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041345_TTUQ1b1x1_2714096_5t5lHmHf/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-10-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041345_TTUQ1b1x1_2714096_5t5lHmHf/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-10-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-10-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-10-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-10-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-10-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-10-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-10-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-10-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041345_TTUQ1b1x1_2714096_5t5lHmHf/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-10-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-10-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=1989, bad_region=28, passed=44470
Got 44470 stars (including 42407 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-10-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 44470 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4925 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4918 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44470 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4925 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44470 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44470 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4918 stars left (next iteration limit 5409)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-10-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4918 robust_rms=9.453 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.431 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4918 robust_rms=0.350 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.369 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4918 robust_rms=0.268 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.302 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4918 robust_rms_before=0.269 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.278 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.268 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.301 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.302
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.301 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-10-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits N_match=4918 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.286 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.287 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.259 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.276 n_q1=1115 n_q2=1008 n_q3=1279 n_q4=1516 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.209
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-10-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-10-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041345_TTUQ1b1x1_2714096_5t5lHmHf/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-10-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-10-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-10-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.3FxWOCJMbD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-15_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041345_TTUQ1b1x1_2714096_5t5lHmHf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041345_TTUQ1b1x1_2714096_5t5lHmHf/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041345_TTUQ1b1x1_2714096_5t5lHmHf/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041345_TTUQ1b1x1_2714096_5t5lHmHf/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041345_TTUQ1b1x1_2714096_5t5lHmHf/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041345_TTUQ1b1x1_2714096_5t5lHmHf/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041345_TTUQ1b1x1_2714096_5t5lHmHf/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041345_TTUQ1b1x1_2714096_5t5lHmHf/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=1916, bad_region=32, passed=44280
Got 44280 stars (including 42277 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 44280 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4919 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44280 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44280 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44280 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 4919 stars left (next iteration limit 5410)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4919 robust_rms=9.475 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.218 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4919 robust_rms=0.339 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.347 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4919 robust_rms=0.259 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.301 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4919 robust_rms_before=0.260 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.262 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.259 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.300 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.301
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.300 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits N_match=4919 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.264 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.273 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.228 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.255 n_q1=1120 n_q2=1006 n_q3=1286 n_q4=1507 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.247
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041345_TTUQ1b1x1_2714096_5t5lHmHf/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-10-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041345_TTUQ1b1x1_2714096_5t5lHmHf/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-10-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0352.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_041345_TTUQ1b1x1_2714096_5t5lHmHf/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:28:34.21 +27:09:55.8: 14.01 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:21:12.63 +21:22:27.4: 13.78 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:49:12.14 +22:42:55.9: 14.19 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:14:10.75 +21:04:46.0: 14.25 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:10:20.37 +26:05:52.7: 12.28 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:21:12.63 +21:22:27.4: 13.73 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:49:12.14 +22:42:55.9: 14.33 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:14:10.75 +21:04:46.0: 14.32 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:28:34.21 +27:09:55.8: 13.95 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.29 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.25 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.98 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:21:12.63 +21:22:27.4: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.3027 delta=-0.55 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:49:12.14 +22:42:55.9: ref_mag=14.25 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1234 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:14:10.75 +21:04:46.0: ref_mag=14.29 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2127 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:28:34.21 +27:09:55.8: ref_mag=13.98 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0665 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:39:54.74 +25:11:45.7: 12.80 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:16:44.85 +26:19:53.9: 12.85 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:19:05.66 +19:45:09.4: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:08:57.95 +23:55:06.7: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:10:20.37 +26:05:52.7: 12.26 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.27 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:10:20.37 +26:05:52.7: ref_mag=12.27 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4491 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:39:54.74 +25:11:45.7: 12.74 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.77 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:39:54.74 +25:11:45.7: ref_mag=12.77 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7923 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:19:05.66 +19:45:09.4: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:16:44.85 +26:19:53.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:16:44.85 +26:19:53.9: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:08:57.95 +23:55:06.7: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:44:11.06 +25:53:37.7: 13.58 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:44:11.06 +25:53:37.7: 13.47 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.52 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:44:11.06 +25:53:37.7: ref_mag=13.52 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3034 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:36:51.48 +23:11:59.6: 13.40 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:42:50.31 +24:29:29.6: 13.29 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:34:24.23 +22:45:55.4: 13.42 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:36:51.48 +23:11:59.6: 13.37 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.38 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:36:51.48 +23:11:59.6: ref_mag=13.38 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3111 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:42:50.31 +24:29:29.6: 13.31 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.30 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:42:50.31 +24:29:29.6: ref_mag=13.30 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3225 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:34:24.23 +22:45:55.4: 13.38 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:34:24.23 +22:45:55.4: ref_mag=13.40 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3095 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:23:05.70 +26:52:36.0: 13.60 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:11:16.80 +26:30:25.9: 13.79 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:23:05.70 +26:52:36.0: 13.63 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:17:57.77 +21:36:15.5: 13.81 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.61 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:23:05.70 +26:52:36.0: ref_mag=13.61 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6108 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:11:16.80 +26:30:25.9: 13.78 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:45:19.78 +26:53:23.8: 13.64 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:11:16.80 +26:30:25.9: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5872 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:17:57.77 +21:36:15.5: 13.85 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:41:23.32 +24:59:40.3: 13.68 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:17:57.77 +21:36:15.5: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7200 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:11:49.78 +21:41:57.0: 14.06 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:04:43.40 +25:19:29.1: 15.55 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:45:19.78 +26:53:23.8: 13.67 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.65 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:45:19.78 +26:53:23.8: ref_mag=13.65 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7427 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:41:23.32 +24:59:40.3: 13.61 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:41:23.32 +24:59:40.3: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7736 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:11:49.78 +21:41:57.0: 14.07 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.06 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:11:49.78 +21:41:57.0: ref_mag=14.06 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9078 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:04:43.40 +25:19:29.1: 15.41 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.48 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:04:43.40 +25:19:29.1: ref_mag=15.48 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=13.6710 delta=1.80 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:43:55.73 +20:30:56.3: 16.26 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:29:32.14 +26:24:38.0: 13.94 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:57:12.88 +25:15:30.2: 13.73 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:51:15.02 +24:34:48.6: 13.88 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:43:55.73 +20:30:56.3: 16.34 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:57:12.88 +25:15:30.2: 13.78 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:57:12.88 +25:15:30.2: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7233 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:51:15.02 +24:34:48.6: 13.91 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:29:32.14 +26:24:38.0: 13.91 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.89 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:51:15.02 +24:34:48.6: ref_mag=13.89 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8862 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.92 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:29:32.14 +26:24:38.0: ref_mag=13.92 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9867 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:17:11.75 +19:18:46.0: 14.10 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:39:24.66 +26:50:27.2: 14.04 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:19:06.43 +19:52:17.8: 14.38 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:17:11.75 +19:18:46.0: 13.99 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:17:11.75 +19:18:46.0: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1127 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:39:24.66 +26:50:27.2: 14.13 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.08 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:39:24.66 +26:50:27.2: ref_mag=14.08 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1203 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:19:06.43 +19:52:17.8: 14.33 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.35 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:19:06.43 +19:52:17.8: ref_mag=14.35 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2245 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:36:43.12 +16:56:24.7: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:40:49.45 +25:53:22.9: 14.25 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:36:43.12 +16:56:24.7: 16.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:40:49.45 +25:53:22.9: 14.12 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.18 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:40:49.45 +25:53:22.9: ref_mag=14.18 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2372 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:48:53.94 +22:38:34.7: 16.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:48:53.94 +22:38:34.7: 16.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out87181.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out87189.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out87480.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out87519.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out87667.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out87729.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 13s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 6s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86902_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 86902_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86904_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 86904_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86906_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 86906_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86908_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 86908_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86909_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 86909_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:28:56.71 +25:06:36.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86915_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 86915_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:28:55.69 +25:00:16.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86918_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
Preparing report for the candidate 86918_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86981_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 86981_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:24:24.58 +24:42:55.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86983_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 86983_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86992_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 86992_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:20:23.16 +24:32:56.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87007_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87007_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87011_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87011_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87018_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87018_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87061_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87061_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87072_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87072_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:53:04.24 +25:32:39.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87076_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87076_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87088_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87088_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87129_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87129_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87137_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87137_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87153_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87153_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87169_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87169_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87181_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
Preparing report for the candidate 87181_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87189_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
Preparing report for the candidate 87189_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87209_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87209_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:27:02.54 +24:51:01.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87252_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87252_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87257_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87257_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:31:22.92 +26:10:22.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87272_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87272_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87276_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87276_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87278_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87278_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:53:56.20 +23:09:26.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87279_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87279_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:00:43.02 +18:12:30.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87281_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87281_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87291_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87291_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87297_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87297_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87298_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87298_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87301_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87301_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87306_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87306_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87310_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87310_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87311_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87311_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87323_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87323_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:48:12.54 +26:35:00.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87344_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87344_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:18:15.30 +24:03:59.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87347_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87347_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87349_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87349_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87352_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87352_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:20:26.52 +25:41:17.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87355_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87355_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:32:26.19 +17:35:44.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87375_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87375_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:33:55.33 +24:15:32.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87378_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87378_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87385_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87385_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:43:42.12 +26:21:34.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87386_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87386_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87401_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87401_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:24:20.61 +24:45:10.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87408_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87408_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:02:00.56 +19:54:31.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87418_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87418_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87422_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87422_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87435_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87435_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87437_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87437_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87444_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87444_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87449_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87449_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87453_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87453_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87456_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87456_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87462_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87462_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87473_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87473_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87480_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
Preparing report for the candidate 87480_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87481_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87481_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:36:28.02 +23:53:36.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87485_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87485_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87498_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87498_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87501_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87501_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87503_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87503_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:22:37.43 +24:53:50.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87519_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
Preparing report for the candidate 87519_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87523_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87523_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87530_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87530_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87541_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87541_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87542_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87542_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87543_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87543_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87569_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87569_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:35:06.88 +26:34:16.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87575_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87575_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87593_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87593_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87601_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87601_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87602_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87602_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87607_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87607_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87608_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87608_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87615_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87615_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87618_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87618_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:40:52.54 +25:19:00.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87621_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87621_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87627_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87627_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87636_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87636_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87642_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87642_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:30:52.28 +18:47:14.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87645_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87645_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87657_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87657_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87658_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87658_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87659_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87659_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87667_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
Preparing report for the candidate 87667_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87671_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87671_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87678_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87678_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87682_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87682_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87717_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87717_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87723_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87723_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87724_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87724_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87729_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
Preparing report for the candidate 87729_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87735_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87735_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:19:56.11 +25:11:47.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87740_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87740_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:31:18.18 +26:26:22.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87754_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87754_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87757_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87757_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87762_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87762_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87774_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87774_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87780_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87780_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87786_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87786_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87803_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87803_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87805_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87805_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87806_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87806_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87807_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87807_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87809_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87809_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87811_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87811_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87820_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87820_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87828_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87828_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87838_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87838_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87848_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87848_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87852_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87852_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87854_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87854_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87856_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87856_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87862_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87862_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87866_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87866_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87867_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87867_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87868_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87868_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87869_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87869_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87871_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87871_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87899_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87899_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87901_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87901_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87903_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87903_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87905_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87905_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87907_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87907_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87913_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87913_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87916_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 87916_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 45202_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 45202_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:02:39.36 +21:03:59.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63847_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 63847_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:36:48.26 +19:41:19.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83011_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 83011_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81303_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 81303_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20109_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 20109_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:07:06.39 +24:31:56.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57655_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353
The candidate 57655_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0353 did not pass the final checks
