This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040945_TTUQ1b1x1_2040814_QlGZ0x2m
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 15.3806 2461267.8806 11.92 06:01:49.11 +31:50:26.5
179.26044 4.48183 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 7.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.115 Thyra 1 0 1 12.2 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:01:49.11 +31:50:26.5: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:01:49.11 +31:50:26.5: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461267.8806,11.92,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260815.3806 11.92CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 15.3806 2461267.8806 12.24 06:24:53.10 +24:37:11.0
188.05669 5.53364 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.0" and 8.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.30 Urania 1 1 1 12.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:24:53.10 +24:37:11.0: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:24:53.10 +24:37:11.0: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461267.8806,12.24,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260815.3806 12.24CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 15.3806 2461267.8806 12.63 06:29:10.94 +32:06:22.5
181.73757 9.74471 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 7.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.250 Bettina -0 1 1 13.3 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:29:10.94 +32:06:22.5: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:29:10.94 +32:06:22.5: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461267.8806,12.63,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260815.3806 12.63CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 15.3806 2461267.8806 13.24 06:08:28.50 +33:06:21.5
178.82799 6.32204 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 7.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.702 Alauda 0 -0 0 13.7 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:08:28.50 +33:06:21.5: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:08:28.50 +33:06:21.5: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461267.8806,13.24,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260815.3806 13.24CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 15.3806 2461267.8806 13.72 05:39:28.82 +31:55:42.2
176.75949 0.45096 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.2" and 7.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.172 Baucis 1 -0 1 13.8 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:39:28.82 +31:55:42.2: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:39:28.82 +31:55:42.2: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461267.8806,13.72,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260815.3806 13.72CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 15.3806 2461267.8806 13.11 06:08:08.63 +29:48:19.5
181.70667 4.68233 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 7.3 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ZTF J060808.67+294818.8
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.181 r Y 0.178 r 2458443.98190 48.232812500000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:08:08.63 +29:48:19.5: 13.99 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:08:08.63 +29:48:19.5: 14.11 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.05 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ZTF J060808.67+294818.8,2461267.8806,13.11,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ZTF J060808.67+294818.8 20260815.3806 13.11CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 15.3806 2461267.8806 10.97 06:04:44.97 +28:51:58.8
182.17185 3.58059 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 7.3 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J060444.96+285159.6
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.780 g Y 0.430 g 2458566.68200 78.890000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:04:44.97 +28:51:58.8: 11.87 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:04:44.97 +28:51:58.8: 11.87 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.87 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J060444.96+285159.6,2461267.8806,10.97,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J060444.96+285159.6 20260815.3806 10.97CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 15.3806 2461267.8806 11.39 06:14:08.32 +32:33:33.6
179.87727 7.11472 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 7.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" NSVS 7043521
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
9.950 R1 10.250 R1
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:14:08.32 +32:33:33.6: 12.29 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:14:08.32 +32:33:33.6: 12.29 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.29 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS 7043521,2461267.8806,11.39,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS 7043521 20260815.3806 11.39CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 15.3806 2461267.8806 13.32 06:01:10.45 +31:35:14.1
179.41455 4.23811 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 7.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | DocumentRef: VOTx996306 | 06:01:10.45 +31:35:14.1 (user input) | (GCVS) | (GCVS) | (position from user input) J-Ks=1.567+/-0.035 (Very red! L if it's a dwarf)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:01:10.45 +31:35:14.1: 14.29 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:01:10.45 +31:35:14.1: 14.25 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.27 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
DocumentRef: VOTx996306,2461267.8806,13.32,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
DocumentRef: VOTx996306 20260815.3806 13.32CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 15.3806 2461267.8806 12.46 06:13:13.37 +26:58:12.6
184.74046 4.30993 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 7.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" GSC 01885-00349
Type: SRS
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.600 V 13.900 V 2457706.91600 22.410000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:13:13.37 +26:58:12.6: 13.38 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:13:13.37 +26:58:12.6: 13.36 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.37 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
GSC 01885-00349,2461267.8806,12.46,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
GSC 01885-00349 20260815.3806 12.46CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 15.3806 2461267.8806 12.88 05:38:33.75 +25:25:56.8
182.15232 -3.17966 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 7.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 4" IX Tau
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.000 pg < 20.000 pg 2439551.00000 273.000000000000 M10
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:38:33.75 +25:25:56.8: 13.84 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:38:33.75 +25:25:56.8: 13.88 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.86 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 15.3806* 05 38 33.75 +25 25 56.8 12.9 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
IX Tau,2461267.8806,12.88,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
IX Tau 20260815.3806 12.88CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.61992316 22.02.2026 02:52:31.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
First image: 2461093.61992316 22.02.2026 02:52:31.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Last image: 2461267.88088542 15.08.2026 09:08:18.500 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040945_TTUQ1b1x1_2040814_QlGZ0x2m/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 17
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.72
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 15 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 25282
Objects passed selection criteria: 25171
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 19139
Average stars matched: 18614 (97.2569 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 252308 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Aug 15 04:17:24 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.61992316 22.02.2026 02:52:31.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
First image: 2461093.61992316 22.02.2026 02:52:31.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Last image: 2461267.88088542 15.08.2026 09:08:18.500 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040945_TTUQ1b1x1_2040814_QlGZ0x2m/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 233
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.36
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 100 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 193714
Objects passed selection criteria: 193199
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 143672
Average stars matched: 138418 (96.3437 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 654236 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Aug 15 04:20:28 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040945_TTUQ1b1x1_2040814_QlGZ0x2m/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-07-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040945_TTUQ1b1x1_2040814_QlGZ0x2m/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040945_TTUQ1b1x1_2040814_QlGZ0x2m/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-07-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040945_TTUQ1b1x1_2040814_QlGZ0x2m/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461267.88025486
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-07-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:00.478 +29:59:52.02 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-07-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-07-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits
Image size: 945.1'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:10.755 +29:58:56.45 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:00:00.478 +29:59:52.02
Second-epoch image center 06:00:10.755 +29:58:56.45
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0402 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
Image size: 945.0'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:08.586 +29:58:23.18 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:00:00.478 +29:59:52.02
Second-epoch image center 06:00:08.586 +29:58:23.18
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0383 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 06:00:10.755 +29:58:56.45
Second-epoch second image center 06:00:08.586 +29:58:23.18
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01211 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XrPLfBrmNC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2dwCn8kpFv
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040945_TTUQ1b1x1_2040814_QlGZ0x2m/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-07-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PnnxRXvlqs
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040945_TTUQ1b1x1_2040814_QlGZ0x2m/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-07-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040945_TTUQ1b1x1_2040814_QlGZ0x2m/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZZt0cC6AyO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040945_TTUQ1b1x1_2040814_QlGZ0x2m/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 27193 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5790 to 99.6671 deg, Dec +24.3414 to +35.3066 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5790 to 99.6671 deg, Dec 24.3414 to 35.3066 deg
Loaded 17097 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 12045 out of 13628 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 13628 out of 27193 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.946400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.946400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.72
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.23
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.23
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 27193 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5790 to 99.6671 deg, Dec +24.3414 to +35.3066 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5790 to 99.6671 deg, Dec 24.3414 to 35.3066 deg
Loaded 17097 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 12045 out of 13628 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 13628 out of 27193 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 27141 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5933 to 99.6669 deg, Dec +24.3420 to +35.3116 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5933 to 99.6669 deg, Dec 24.3420 to 35.3116 deg
Loaded 17089 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 12096 out of 13641 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 13641 out of 27141 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 17 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
2.1 pix Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
2.9 pix fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-07-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits
2.9 pix fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
15.2 mag. Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-07-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.9 (SNR ) 11.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.XrPLfBrmNC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-15_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040945_TTUQ1b1x1_2040814_QlGZ0x2m/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3136, bad_region=0, passed=27193
Got 27193 stars (including 24022 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27193 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4849 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4793 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4793 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4793 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27193 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4849 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4793 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27193 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4793 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27193 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 4793 stars left (next iteration limit 5272)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits N_match=4793 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.593 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.452 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.444 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.391 n_q1=1003 n_q2=1397 n_q3=1274 n_q4=1119 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.304
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits -region wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.2dwCn8kpFv (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-15_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040945_TTUQ1b1x1_2040814_QlGZ0x2m/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3121, bad_region=0, passed=27141
Got 27141 stars (including 23994 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27141 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4852 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4798 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4798 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4798 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27141 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4852 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4799 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27141 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4799 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27141 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 4799 stars left (next iteration limit 5277)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits N_match=4799 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.453 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.562 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.461 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.446 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.384 n_q1=1006 n_q2=1397 n_q3=1273 n_q4=1123 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.242
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -region wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.PnnxRXvlqs (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-15_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040945_TTUQ1b1x1_2040814_QlGZ0x2m/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040945_TTUQ1b1x1_2040814_QlGZ0x2m/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-07-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040945_TTUQ1b1x1_2040814_QlGZ0x2m/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-07-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040945_TTUQ1b1x1_2040814_QlGZ0x2m/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-07-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040945_TTUQ1b1x1_2040814_QlGZ0x2m/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-07-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040945_TTUQ1b1x1_2040814_QlGZ0x2m/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-07-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040945_TTUQ1b1x1_2040814_QlGZ0x2m/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-07-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-07-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-07-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-07-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-07-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-07-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-07-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-07-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040945_TTUQ1b1x1_2040814_QlGZ0x2m/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-07-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-07-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=528, bad_region=0, passed=11286
Got 11286 stars (including 10751 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-07-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11286 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013126 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010501 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.0 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4857 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4783 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4785 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4783 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11286 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.0 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4856 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4784 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11286 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4784 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11286 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4784 stars left (next iteration limit 5261)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4784 robust_rms=7.252 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.982 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4784 robust_rms=0.517 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=1.063 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4784 robust_rms=0.458 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.555 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4784 robust_rms_before=1.548 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.478 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.458 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.638 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.555
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-07-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-07-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits
Image size: 945.5'x626.8' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:10.863 +29:58:54.98 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 11286 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-07-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-15_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040945_TTUQ1b1x1_2040814_QlGZ0x2m/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2928172.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 1.548 -> 0.458 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-07-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits N_match=4784 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.474 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.467 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.603 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.581 n_q1=1233 n_q2=886 n_q3=1704 n_q4=961 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.272
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-07-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-07-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040945_TTUQ1b1x1_2040814_QlGZ0x2m/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-07-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-07-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-07-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ZZt0cC6AyO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-15_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040945_TTUQ1b1x1_2040814_QlGZ0x2m/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040945_TTUQ1b1x1_2040814_QlGZ0x2m/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040945_TTUQ1b1x1_2040814_QlGZ0x2m/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040945_TTUQ1b1x1_2040814_QlGZ0x2m/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040945_TTUQ1b1x1_2040814_QlGZ0x2m/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040945_TTUQ1b1x1_2040814_QlGZ0x2m/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040945_TTUQ1b1x1_2040814_QlGZ0x2m/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040945_TTUQ1b1x1_2040814_QlGZ0x2m/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=541, bad_region=0, passed=11353
Got 11353 stars (including 10799 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11353 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013125 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010500 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.0 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4856 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4785 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4787 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4785 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11353 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.0 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4855 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4788 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11353 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4788 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11353 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 4788 stars left (next iteration limit 5263)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4788 robust_rms=7.526 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.577 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4788 robust_rms=0.546 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.858 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4788 robust_rms=0.453 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.576 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4788 robust_rms_before=1.555 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.469 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.453 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.647 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.576
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
Image size: 945.3'x626.8' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:08.690 +29:58:21.69 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 11353 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-15_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040945_TTUQ1b1x1_2040814_QlGZ0x2m/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2928064.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 1.555 -> 0.453 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits N_match=4788 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.473 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.475 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.591 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.535 n_q1=1227 n_q2=899 n_q3=1694 n_q4=968 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.249
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040945_TTUQ1b1x1_2040814_QlGZ0x2m/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-07-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-07-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-07-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits sigma_overall=0.454 worst_q_ratio=1.304
ref2=Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits sigma_overall=0.453 worst_q_ratio=1.242
new1=fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-07-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits sigma_overall=0.474 worst_q_ratio=1.272
new2=fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits sigma_overall=0.473 worst_q_ratio=1.249
reference average sigma_overall=0.4535 worst_q_ratio=1.273
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_astrometric_residuals.png (4793 matched stars from wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.43 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_astrometric_residuals.png (4799 matched stars from wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.43 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-07-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348_astrometric_residuals.png (4784 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-07-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349_astrometric_residuals.png (4788 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-07-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-07-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040945_TTUQ1b1x1_2040814_QlGZ0x2m/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-07-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040945_TTUQ1b1x1_2040814_QlGZ0x2m/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:52:46.99 +32:33:19.7: 10.51 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:52:46.99 +32:33:19.7: 10.55 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.53 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:52:46.99 +32:33:19.7: ref_mag=10.53 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.8603 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 2s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31900_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 31900_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:15.21 +32:30:33.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31901_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 31901_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:07.40 +32:33:00.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31903_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 31903_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:15.88 +32:31:06.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31905_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 31905_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32020_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 32020_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:12.26 +32:03:12.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32036_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 32036_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:28.75 +29:51:03.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18816_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 18816_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:29.26 +27:29:07.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17096_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 17096_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:17.07 +28:29:01.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15512_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 15512_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:59:32.80 +29:09:40.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17578_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 17578_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:41.99 +28:18:25.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25384_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 25384_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:48.89 +25:25:24.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09256_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 09256_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:26.70 +31:46:03.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09704_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 09704_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:57.72 +31:24:25.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08609_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 08609_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:33:17.06 +31:35:28.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16931_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 16931_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:21.05 +28:36:30.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18054_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 18054_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:51.70 +28:08:09.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14094_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 14094_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:15:22.22 +29:29:44.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Aur-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040945_TTUQ1b1x1_2040814_QlGZ0x2m/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-07-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040945_TTUQ1b1x1_2040814_QlGZ0x2m/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040945_TTUQ1b1x1_2040814_QlGZ0x2m/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-07-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040945_TTUQ1b1x1_2040814_QlGZ0x2m/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-07-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-07-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:00.478 +29:59:52.02 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-07-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-07-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits
Image size: 945.5'x626.8' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:10.863 +29:58:54.98 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:00:00.478 +29:59:52.02
Second-epoch image center 06:00:10.863 +29:58:54.98
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0407 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
Image size: 945.3'x626.8' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:08.690 +29:58:21.69 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:00:00.478 +29:59:52.02
Second-epoch image center 06:00:08.690 +29:58:21.69
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0388 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 06:00:10.863 +29:58:54.98
Second-epoch second image center 06:00:08.690 +29:58:21.69
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01213 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZAvilri8XY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6TfTLqfq5I
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040945_TTUQ1b1x1_2040814_QlGZ0x2m/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-07-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7McXL12Gl7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040945_TTUQ1b1x1_2040814_QlGZ0x2m/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-07-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040945_TTUQ1b1x1_2040814_QlGZ0x2m/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ECcUPMvOF3
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040945_TTUQ1b1x1_2040814_QlGZ0x2m/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 212828 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5594 to 99.6902 deg, Dec +24.3171 to +35.3065 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5594 to 99.6902 deg, Dec 24.3171 to 35.3065 deg
Loaded 17190 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9236 out of 14303 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14303 out of 212828 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.790850
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.790850
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.36
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.43
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.43
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 212828 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5594 to 99.6902 deg, Dec +24.3171 to +35.3065 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5594 to 99.6902 deg, Dec 24.3171 to 35.3065 deg
Loaded 17190 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9236 out of 14303 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14303 out of 212828 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 212641 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5682 to 99.6901 deg, Dec +24.3244 to +35.3140 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5682 to 99.6901 deg, Dec 24.3244 to 35.3140 deg
Loaded 17179 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9281 out of 14295 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14295 out of 212641 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 213 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
1.9 pix Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
2.8 pix fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-07-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits
2.8 pix fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
15.4 mag. Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-07-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.9 (SNR ) 13.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.ZAvilri8XY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-15_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040945_TTUQ1b1x1_2040814_QlGZ0x2m/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=1, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=79, blended=32424, bad_region=1, passed=212748
Got 212748 stars (including 179989 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 212748 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4810 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4767 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 212748 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4810 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 212748 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 212748 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 4766 stars left (next iteration limit 5242)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits N_match=4766 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.431 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.566 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.439 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.375 n_q1=1028 n_q2=1362 n_q3=1243 n_q4=1133 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.313
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits -region wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.6TfTLqfq5I (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-15_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040945_TTUQ1b1x1_2040814_QlGZ0x2m/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=51, blended=32176, bad_region=4, passed=212590
Got 212590 stars (including 180083 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 212590 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4805 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4766 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 212590 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4805 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 212590 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 212590 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4766 stars left (next iteration limit 5242)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits N_match=4766 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.575 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.419 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.371 n_q1=1026 n_q2=1364 n_q3=1217 n_q4=1159 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.319
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -region wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.7McXL12Gl7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-15_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040945_TTUQ1b1x1_2040814_QlGZ0x2m/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040945_TTUQ1b1x1_2040814_QlGZ0x2m/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-07-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040945_TTUQ1b1x1_2040814_QlGZ0x2m/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-07-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040945_TTUQ1b1x1_2040814_QlGZ0x2m/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-07-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040945_TTUQ1b1x1_2040814_QlGZ0x2m/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-07-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040945_TTUQ1b1x1_2040814_QlGZ0x2m/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-07-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040945_TTUQ1b1x1_2040814_QlGZ0x2m/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-07-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-07-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-07-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-07-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-07-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-07-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-07-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-07-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040945_TTUQ1b1x1_2040814_QlGZ0x2m/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-07-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-07-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=4860, bad_region=16, passed=75498
Got 75498 stars (including 70532 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-07-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 75498 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013132 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010506 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.0 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4844 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4786 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4786 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4786 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75498 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.0 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4846 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4789 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75498 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4789 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75498 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 4789 stars left (next iteration limit 5264)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-07-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4789 robust_rms=7.459 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.034 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4789 robust_rms=0.526 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=1.051 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4789 robust_rms=0.461 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.544 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4789 robust_rms_before=0.462 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.468 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.461 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.551 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.544
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.551 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-07-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits N_match=4789 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.452 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.451 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.589 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.449 n_q1=1241 n_q2=871 n_q3=1706 n_q4=971 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.303
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-07-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-07-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040945_TTUQ1b1x1_2040814_QlGZ0x2m/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-07-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-07-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-07-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ECcUPMvOF3 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-15_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040945_TTUQ1b1x1_2040814_QlGZ0x2m/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040945_TTUQ1b1x1_2040814_QlGZ0x2m/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040945_TTUQ1b1x1_2040814_QlGZ0x2m/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040945_TTUQ1b1x1_2040814_QlGZ0x2m/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040945_TTUQ1b1x1_2040814_QlGZ0x2m/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040945_TTUQ1b1x1_2040814_QlGZ0x2m/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040945_TTUQ1b1x1_2040814_QlGZ0x2m/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040945_TTUQ1b1x1_2040814_QlGZ0x2m/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=4973, bad_region=16, passed=77027
Got 77027 stars (including 71924 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 77027 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013129 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010503 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.0 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4849 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4795 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4795 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4795 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 77027 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.0 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4849 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4796 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 77027 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4796 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 77027 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 4796 stars left (next iteration limit 5274)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4796 robust_rms=7.589 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.359 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4796 robust_rms=0.544 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.862 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4796 robust_rms=0.456 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.576 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4796 robust_rms_before=0.456 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.467 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.456 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.577 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.576
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.577 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits N_match=4796 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.450 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.457 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.625 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.444 n_q1=1243 n_q2=873 n_q3=1709 n_q4=971 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.386
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040945_TTUQ1b1x1_2040814_QlGZ0x2m/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-07-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040945_TTUQ1b1x1_2040814_QlGZ0x2m/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-07-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0348.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-15_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_040945_TTUQ1b1x1_2040814_QlGZ0x2m/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:52:37.38 +35:09:57.3: 13.47 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:56:50.68 +32:30:26.4: 13.69 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:04:04.97 +26:10:46.9: 12.79 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:30:00.32 +33:25:04.6: 13.56 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:09:29.45 +30:36:35.2: 13.11 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:58:21.30 +34:19:41.1: 12.90 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:56:50.68 +32:30:26.4: 13.75 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:52:37.38 +35:09:57.3: 13.50 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:30:00.32 +33:25:04.6: 13.52 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.72 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:04:04.97 +26:10:46.9: 12.81 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.48 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:56:50.68 +32:30:26.4: ref_mag=13.72 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5144 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:52:37.38 +35:09:57.3: ref_mag=13.48 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4256 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:09:29.45 +30:36:35.2: 13.13 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:30:00.32 +33:25:04.6: ref_mag=13.54 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5953 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.80 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:04:04.97 +26:10:46.9: ref_mag=12.80 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6407 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.12 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:09:29.45 +30:36:35.2: ref_mag=13.12 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9906 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:41:11.93 +26:16:28.2: 12.58 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:58:21.30 +34:19:41.1: 12.92 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:36:03.11 +34:11:11.6: 13.01 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.91 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:58:21.30 +34:19:41.1: ref_mag=12.91 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9132 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:36:11.52 +31:54:36.4: 12.59 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:36:03.11 +34:11:11.6: 13.06 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.03 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:36:03.11 +34:11:11.6: ref_mag=13.03 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0502 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:41:11.93 +26:16:28.2: 12.55 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.56 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:41:11.93 +26:16:28.2: ref_mag=12.56 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5702 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:31:28.98 +34:51:24.5: 12.55 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:36:11.52 +31:54:36.4: 12.65 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.61 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:36:11.52 +31:54:36.4: ref_mag=12.61 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6898 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:31:28.98 +34:51:24.5: 12.58 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.56 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:31:28.98 +34:51:24.5: ref_mag=12.56 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5514 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:01:49.11 +31:50:26.5: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:01:49.11 +31:50:26.5: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:38:47.98 +35:04:24.8: 12.89 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:14:01.33 +33:16:02.2: 12.89 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:38:20.83 +34:43:08.3: 13.11 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:27:13.24 +34:25:20.0: 13.25 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:38:47.98 +35:04:24.8: 12.96 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.92 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:38:47.98 +35:04:24.8: ref_mag=12.92 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8209 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:14:01.33 +33:16:02.2: 12.86 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.88 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:14:01.33 +33:16:02.2: ref_mag=12.88 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6145 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:23:36.45 +24:29:50.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:38:20.83 +34:43:08.3: 13.14 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.13 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:38:20.83 +34:43:08.3: ref_mag=13.13 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0007 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:27:13.24 +34:25:20.0: 13.31 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.28 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:27:13.24 +34:25:20.0: ref_mag=13.28 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2029 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:26:13.33 +29:58:20.5: 13.30 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:23:36.45 +24:29:50.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:23:36.45 +24:29:50.1: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:24:53.10 +24:37:11.0: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:26:13.33 +29:58:20.5: 13.38 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.34 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:26:13.33 +29:58:20.5: ref_mag=13.34 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1174 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:24:53.10 +24:37:11.0: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:48:04.84 +30:32:10.2: 13.40 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:29:10.94 +32:06:22.5: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:25:59.64 +28:37:33.6: 13.36 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:04:01.50 +27:35:19.8: 13.11 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:48:04.84 +30:32:10.2: 13.36 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.38 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:48:04.84 +30:32:10.2: ref_mag=13.38 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0673 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:29:10.94 +32:06:22.5: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:25:59.64 +28:37:33.6: 13.32 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.34 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:25:59.64 +28:37:33.6: ref_mag=13.34 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.2523 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:04:01.50 +27:35:19.8: 13.03 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.06 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:04:01.50 +27:35:19.8: ref_mag=13.06 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8451 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:46:37.06 +32:41:10.6: 13.60 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:51:56.02 +33:16:57.7: 13.49 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:08:28.50 +33:06:21.5: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:46:37.06 +32:41:10.6: 13.55 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:46:37.06 +32:41:10.6: ref_mag=13.57 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3889 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:51:56.02 +33:16:57.7: 13.48 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.48 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:51:56.02 +33:16:57.7: ref_mag=13.48 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3496 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:39:28.82 +31:55:42.2: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:56:06.25 +32:08:03.3: 13.36 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:08:28.50 +33:06:21.5: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:39:28.82 +31:55:42.2: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:56:06.25 +32:08:03.3: 13.41 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.38 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:56:06.25 +32:08:03.3: ref_mag=13.38 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5291 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:08:08.63 +29:48:19.5: 13.99 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:08:08.63 +29:48:19.5: 14.11 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.05 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:08:08.63 +29:48:19.5: ref_mag=14.05 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.1048 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:04:44.97 +28:51:58.8: 11.87 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:04:44.97 +28:51:58.8: 11.87 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.87 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:04:44.97 +28:51:58.8: ref_mag=11.87 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.9693 delta=0.90 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:14:08.32 +32:33:33.6: 12.29 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:08:37.99 +25:51:09.2: 13.49 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:14:08.32 +32:33:33.6: 12.29 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.29 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:14:08.32 +32:33:33.6: ref_mag=12.29 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.3912 delta=0.90 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:08:37.99 +25:51:09.2: 13.48 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.49 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:08:37.99 +25:51:09.2: ref_mag=13.49 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8117 delta=0.67 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:01:10.45 +31:35:14.1: 14.29 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:01:10.45 +31:35:14.1: 14.25 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.27 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:01:10.45 +31:35:14.1: ref_mag=14.27 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.3280 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:55:18.19 +32:11:57.0: 13.14 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:46:23.36 +32:23:07.2: 12.96 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:55:18.19 +32:11:57.0: 13.18 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.16 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:55:18.19 +32:11:57.0: ref_mag=13.16 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6002 delta=0.56 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:46:23.36 +32:23:07.2: 12.95 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.96 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:46:23.36 +32:23:07.2: ref_mag=12.96 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8215 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:05:45.06 +28:01:59.5: 13.79 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:56:26.05 +29:39:16.8: 13.15 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:56:26.05 +29:39:16.8: 13.16 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:05:45.06 +28:01:59.5: 13.73 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.15 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:56:26.05 +29:39:16.8: ref_mag=13.15 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7961 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:05:45.06 +28:01:59.5: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.8564 delta=0.90 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:13:13.37 +26:58:12.6: 13.38 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:13:13.37 +26:58:12.6: 13.36 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.37 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:13:13.37 +26:58:12.6: ref_mag=13.37 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4459 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:52:51.92 +28:44:18.1: 13.72 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:52:51.92 +28:44:18.1: 13.71 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.72 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:52:51.92 +28:44:18.1: ref_mag=13.72 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1965 delta=0.52 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:38:33.75 +25:25:56.8: 13.84 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:38:33.75 +25:25:56.8: 13.88 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.86 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:38:33.75 +25:25:56.8: ref_mag=13.86 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.8855 delta=0.98 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out107968.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out129999.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out162930.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out196073.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out242506.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out242890.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out243018.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out243241.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out243337.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out51841.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out72276.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 28s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 6s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242168_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 242168_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242172_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 242172_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242176_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 242176_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:18.51 +33:41:07.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242177_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 242177_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242182_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 242182_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:02.18 +31:25:04.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242186_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 242186_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:26.15 +34:29:12.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242191_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 242191_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:05:56.62 +34:59:08.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242192_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 242192_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242194_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 242194_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242195_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 242195_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:25.36 +33:34:47.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242197_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 242197_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:26.35 +33:33:13.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242198_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 242198_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:57:17.57 +31:49:02.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242203_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 242203_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:03.77 +34:26:54.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242205_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 242205_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242206_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 242206_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:41.74 +28:49:55.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242215_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 242215_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:19.18 +34:39:20.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242216_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 242216_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242217_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 242217_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242218_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 242218_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:35.51 +33:48:10.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242220_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 242220_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242221_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 242221_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:59.60 +34:57:14.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242222_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 242222_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:32:09.73 +34:19:31.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242223_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 242223_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:57.13 +33:47:20.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242226_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 242226_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242227_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 242227_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:31.05 +29:01:24.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242228_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 242228_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:14.64 +32:34:51.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242229_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 242229_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:18.04 +32:31:13.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242352_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 242352_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:12.30 +32:03:14.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242391_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 242391_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:27.69 +28:29:43.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242402_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 242402_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:16.32 +32:35:31.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242492_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 242492_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:09.88 +34:55:02.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242494_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 242494_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:33.24 +28:37:19.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242506_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
Preparing report for the candidate 242506_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242511_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 242511_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:40.63 +34:23:16.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242540_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 242540_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:52.59 +27:35:11.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242572_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 242572_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:01.84 +25:55:18.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242583_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 242583_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:32.66 +30:30:48.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242606_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 242606_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:45.09 +31:09:02.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242624_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 242624_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:15.15 +34:48:40.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242638_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 242638_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:12:10.48 +32:41:30.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242642_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 242642_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:23.42 +31:49:13.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242644_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 242644_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:19.35 +31:39:30.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242662_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 242662_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:34.01 +33:00:23.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242678_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 242678_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:16.59 +32:45:55.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242680_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 242680_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242683_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 242683_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:36.96 +25:05:45.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242710_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 242710_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:05:03.79 +26:04:35.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242750_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 242750_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:51.91 +32:33:14.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242755_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 242755_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242758_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 242758_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:17.31 +34:30:09.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242770_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 242770_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:41.21 +33:56:55.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242775_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 242775_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242779_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 242779_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:09.85 +24:55:58.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242780_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 242780_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242788_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 242788_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:11.73 +34:09:31.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242791_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 242791_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:47.57 +33:08:27.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242795_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 242795_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:06:18.79 +29:32:44.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242808_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 242808_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:15.23 +32:06:45.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242825_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 242825_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242828_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 242828_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:40:45.53 +27:47:10.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242845_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 242845_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:06:57.04 +26:41:01.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242853_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 242853_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:44.47 +31:08:27.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242857_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 242857_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242872_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 242872_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:47.13 +29:10:28.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242878_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 242878_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:08:59.98 +34:55:07.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242880_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 242880_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:14.09 +33:06:40.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242890_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
Preparing report for the candidate 242890_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242899_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 242899_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:15:12.04 +29:29:00.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242900_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 242900_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:14.80 +31:57:28.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242907_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 242907_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:34.74 +30:30:37.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242909_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 242909_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:48.43 +31:10:23.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242943_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 242943_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:49.14 +33:17:09.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242959_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 242959_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:00.56 +26:13:10.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242963_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 242963_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:38.59 +25:01:24.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242980_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 242980_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:41.45 +35:10:26.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242983_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 242983_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:07.33 +28:15:07.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242992_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 242992_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:30:51.20 +32:48:37.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242994_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 242994_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:33.16 +32:52:42.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243000_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 243000_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:02:49.18 +32:38:47.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243002_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 243002_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:59:38.30 +32:48:44.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243004_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 243004_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:50:50.99 +27:58:19.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243008_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 243008_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243018_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
Preparing report for the candidate 243018_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243025_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 243025_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:43.55 +32:59:11.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243029_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 243029_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:56:46.90 +32:30:23.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243031_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 243031_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:13.61 +32:04:16.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243038_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 243038_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:32.58 +30:42:55.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243046_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 243046_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243058_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 243058_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243068_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 243068_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:07:03.87 +33:01:59.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243070_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 243070_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:53.14 +28:27:39.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243089_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 243089_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:50.91 +33:20:47.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243093_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 243093_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:07.12 +34:56:16.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243098_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 243098_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:50:24.94 +31:04:18.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243106_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 243106_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:19.91 +31:18:08.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243108_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 243108_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:50.73 +30:45:42.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243113_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 243113_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:40.77 +32:02:23.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243142_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 243142_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:24.65 +27:54:24.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243145_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 243145_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:49.18 +30:55:45.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243152_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 243152_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243155_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 243155_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:22:29.36 +28:08:02.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243178_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 243178_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:15.94 +34:30:38.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243193_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 243193_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243208_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 243208_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:33.01 +32:17:55.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243239_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 243239_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:08.30 +33:08:14.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243241_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
Preparing report for the candidate 243241_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243264_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 243264_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:59.87 +32:02:08.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243288_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 243288_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:41.46 +32:47:47.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243321_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 243321_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:02.19 +27:09:55.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243337_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
Preparing report for the candidate 243337_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243351_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 243351_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243377_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 243377_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:59:40.39 +32:48:59.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243385_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 243385_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:05.21 +32:24:53.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167626_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 167626_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:57:59.69 +25:57:17.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50616_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 50616_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:12:20.00 +32:41:32.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116475_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 116475_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:15:22.25 +29:29:44.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159674_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 159674_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:19.86 +27:36:45.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117937_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 117937_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:06:22.35 +29:30:43.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13713_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 13713_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:05:23.13 +34:27:54.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144103_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 144103_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:41.87 +28:18:22.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146772_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 146772_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:14:36.57 +27:56:00.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173004_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 173004_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:08:45.01 +25:51:18.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55107_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 55107_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:19:09.14 +32:18:43.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153246_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 153246_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:05:00.92 +27:45:54.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107968_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
Preparing report for the candidate 107968_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70434_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 70434_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:50:37.26 +31:42:41.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69618_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 69618_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:26.78 +31:46:02.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66618_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 66618_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:59:31.62 +31:56:03.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129999_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
Preparing report for the candidate 129999_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162899_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 162899_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:48.86 +25:25:25.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 123168_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 123168_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:59:32.80 +29:09:41.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51841_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
Preparing report for the candidate 51841_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173612_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 173612_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109928_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 109928_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:14:53.66 +29:42:12.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145773_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 145773_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:51.70 +28:08:10.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209789_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 209789_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:50:00.63 +25:17:12.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 44640_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 44640_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:59:02.04 +32:58:47.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 136018_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 136018_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:21.06 +28:36:31.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167008_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 167008_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:17:33.79 +25:26:43.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 136086_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 136086_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:22.02 +28:33:04.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82530_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 82530_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:21:56.73 +30:53:16.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61548_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 61548_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:08:53.61 +32:06:20.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 124884_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 124884_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:17:05.58 +28:56:03.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130731_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 130731_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:56:33.69 +28:48:39.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59148_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 59148_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:07:00.33 +32:13:10.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75870_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 75870_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:10:30.90 +31:25:49.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72276_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
Preparing report for the candidate 72276_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88249_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 88249_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:56:48.35 +30:50:08.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 204588_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 204588_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:18.13 +24:59:42.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28544_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 28544_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:23.52 +33:45:03.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135068_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 135068_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:59:20.93 +28:36:17.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79766_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 79766_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:20:38.39 +31:03:05.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81129_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 81129_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:08:09.33 +31:08:01.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107520_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 107520_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:28.71 +29:51:03.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62401_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 62401_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:08:40.00 +32:01:54.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11759_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 11759_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:51.75 +34:35:21.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60257_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 60257_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 226537_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 226537_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119656_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 119656_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:50.46 +29:13:06.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56703_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 56703_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:57:14.72 +32:22:39.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146748_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 146748_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:10.52 +28:03:31.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168208_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 168208_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:43.53 +25:40:42.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146439_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 146439_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112366_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 112366_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158410_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 158410_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:14:14.02 +27:23:07.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156560_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 156560_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:40:49.20 +27:36:16.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08724_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 08724_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:23.45 +34:45:27.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137801_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 137801_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:03.89 +28:27:29.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142517_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 142517_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:19.27 +28:15:32.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76109_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 76109_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:15.58 +31:22:54.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111257_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 111257_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:50.17 +29:24:11.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146773_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 146773_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:40.04 +28:00:50.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230172_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 230172_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:43.24 +29:06:49.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153284_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 153284_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:15.27 +27:47:46.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34292_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 34292_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:25.23 +33:26:00.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207789_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 207789_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (42.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115105_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 115105_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:47.49 +29:32:51.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113818_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 113818_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:15:37.22 +29:27:29.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 210171_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 210171_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:40.16 +24:56:07.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172224_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 172224_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:49.87 +25:55:19.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125354_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 125354_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:10.83 +29:04:47.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196073_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
Preparing report for the candidate 196073_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89530_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 89530_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:01.64 +30:45:33.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08027_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 08027_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:18:22.88 +34:38:11.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 174517_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 174517_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:36.18 +25:59:50.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131430_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 131430_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:24.36 +28:40:48.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20812_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 20812_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:33:11.39 +33:40:08.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27755_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 27755_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:24:35.33 +33:28:48.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 123357_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 123357_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:02:37.75 +29:07:07.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137469_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 137469_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:17.10 +28:29:02.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132235_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 132235_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81801_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 81801_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:05:31.33 +31:05:33.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 210727_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 210727_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:43.39 +25:12:23.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158400_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 158400_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:15:28.39 +27:23:46.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91853_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 91853_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:08.85 +30:22:14.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79040_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 79040_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:29:12.76 +30:56:49.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 178641_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 178641_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:17:52.80 +25:57:39.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105842_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 105842_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:13.63 +29:53:58.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145768_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 145768_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:30:54.25 +27:45:42.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09876_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 09876_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:02:50.47 +34:41:47.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109191_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 109191_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:53.00 +29:50:16.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149793_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 149793_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:08:59.69 +27:55:02.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125198_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 125198_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:52.11 +29:02:16.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63229_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 63229_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:03.02 +32:03:19.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64657_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 64657_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:33:17.00 +31:35:28.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114879_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 114879_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:16:49.55 +29:22:40.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153136_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 153136_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:29.26 +27:29:07.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162930_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
Preparing report for the candidate 162930_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69742_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 69742_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:06:28.14 +31:40:45.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77282_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 77282_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:57.70 +31:24:25.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159325_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 159325_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:00.39 +27:34:22.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 210975_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 210975_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:24:43.76 +25:02:55.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90173_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349
The candidate 90173_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-15_04-08-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0349 did not pass the final checks
