This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-13_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_034747_TTUQ1b1x1_2157303_KO5GUZOK
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 13.3659 2461265.8659 13.21 05:38:24.08 +52:25:14.4
159.09257 11.02948 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 6.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" ASASSN-V J053824.04+522514.4
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
15.600 g Y 0.390 g 2458850.73300 546.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits at 05:38:24.08 +52:25:14.4: 14.19 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits at 05:38:24.08 +52:25:14.4: 14.12 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.15 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J053824.04+522514.4,2461265.8659,13.21,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J053824.04+522514.4 20260813.3659 13.21CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 13.3659 2461265.8659 12.77 05:39:42.60 +50:54:24.4
160.52432 10.43432 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 6.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" NSVS J0539415+505413
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.248 r Y 0.212 r 2458450.96360 63.858701800000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits at 05:39:42.60 +50:54:24.4: 13.67 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits at 05:39:42.60 +50:54:24.4: 13.72 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.69 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0539415+505413,2461265.8659,12.77,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0539415+505413 20260813.3659 12.77CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 13.3659 2461265.8659 12.73 05:34:27.54 +56:41:08.3
155.04261 12.70540 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 6.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J053427.56+564109.5
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.790 V 14.190 V 2458336.95490 57.162379600000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits at 05:34:27.54 +56:41:08.3: 13.58 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits at 05:34:27.54 +56:41:08.3: 13.57 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J053427.56+564109.5,2461265.8659,12.73,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J053427.56+564109.5 20260813.3659 12.73CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 13.3659 2461265.8659 13.41 05:54:03.25 +53:30:54.6
159.28354 13.62083 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.9" and 5.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" NSVS 2272108
Type: SR|L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.205 R1 12.894 R1 2451467.26000 > 361.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits at 05:54:03.25 +53:30:54.6: 14.63 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits at 05:54:03.25 +53:30:54.6: 14.73 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.67 +/- 0.07
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS 2272108,2461265.8659,13.41,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS 2272108 20260813.3659 13.41CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 13.3659 2461265.8659 12.22 05:33:57.95 +52:48:27.7
158.40216 10.65095 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 6.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was found in ASASSN-V 0" ASASSN-V J053357.90+524827.6
Type: SR
MeanMag 13.52 m Amp. 0.15 m Period 26.3457726 d
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits at 05:33:57.95 +52:48:27.7: 13.19 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits at 05:33:57.95 +52:48:27.7: 13.17 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.18 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461265.8659,12.22,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260813.3659 12.22CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 13.3659 2461265.8659 11.79 05:36:01.97 +52:39:07.3
158.70247 10.83831 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 6.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" ASASSN-V J053601.98+523907.0
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.930 V 13.420 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits at 05:36:01.97 +52:39:07.3: 12.71 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits at 05:36:01.97 +52:39:07.3: 12.69 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.70 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J053601.98+523907.0,2461265.8659,11.79,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J053601.98+523907.0 20260813.3659 11.79CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 13.3659 2461265.8659 13.15 05:54:16.47 +53:37:24.3
159.20019 13.69976 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 6.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" V0739 Aur
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.450 R 12.800 R 2451505.00000 34.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits at 05:54:16.47 +53:37:24.3: 14.22 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits at 05:54:16.47 +53:37:24.3: 14.31 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.26 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V0739 Aur,2461265.8659,13.15,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V0739 Aur 20260813.3659 13.15CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 13.3659 2461265.8659 13.01 05:28:13.91 +55:09:36.8
155.91241 11.16811 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 6.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" ASASSN-V J052813.89+550936.9
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.100 V 14.600 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits at 05:28:13.91 +55:09:36.8: 14.13 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits at 05:28:13.91 +55:09:36.8: 14.08 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.10 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J052813.89+550936.9,2461265.8659,13.01,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J052813.89+550936.9 20260813.3659 13.01CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.74181476 18.01.2026 05:48:02.795 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits
First image: 2461058.74181476 18.01.2026 05:48:02.795 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits
Last image: 2461265.86623839 13.08.2026 08:47:12.997 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-13_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_034747_TTUQ1b1x1_2157303_KO5GUZOK/fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 2
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.56
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 18568
Objects passed selection criteria: 18507
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 13833.2
Average stars matched: 13527.8 (97.7916 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 243660 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Aug 6 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-190-gdf2934b0
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Aug 13 03:49:36 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.74181476 18.01.2026 05:48:02.795 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits
First image: 2461058.74181476 18.01.2026 05:48:02.795 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits
Last image: 2461265.86623839 13.08.2026 08:47:12.997 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-13_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_034747_TTUQ1b1x1_2157303_KO5GUZOK/fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 91
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.26
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 41 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 128982
Objects passed selection criteria: 128682
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 96905.8
Average stars matched: 93506.2 (96.492 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 596836 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Aug 6 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-190-gdf2934b0
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Aug 13 03:51:11 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-13_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_034747_TTUQ1b1x1_2157303_KO5GUZOK/fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-13_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_034747_TTUQ1b1x1_2157303_KO5GUZOK/fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-13_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_034747_TTUQ1b1x1_2157303_KO5GUZOK/fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-13_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_034747_TTUQ1b1x1_2157303_KO5GUZOK/fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461265.86551384
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits'
wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits'
wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits'
wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:38:52.744 +53:59:24.28 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits
Image size: 942.0'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:38:31.602 +54:00:02.17 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:38:52.744 +53:59:24.28
Second-epoch image center 05:38:31.602 +54:00:02.17
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0528 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
Image size: 942.0'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:38:29.207 +54:00:33.16 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:38:52.744 +53:59:24.28
Second-epoch image center 05:38:29.207 +54:00:33.16
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0607 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:38:31.602 +54:00:02.17
Second-epoch second image center 05:38:29.207 +54:00:33.16
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01042 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits &> /tmp/tmp.IwkUGA7lId
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1NbybZTOPQ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-13_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_034747_TTUQ1b1x1_2157303_KO5GUZOK/fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits &> /tmp/tmp.h4AfkrZWid
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-13_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_034747_TTUQ1b1x1_2157303_KO5GUZOK/fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-13_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_034747_TTUQ1b1x1_2157303_KO5GUZOK/fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits &> /tmp/tmp.toUbqvOVns
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-13_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_034747_TTUQ1b1x1_2157303_KO5GUZOK/fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits and wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits and wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits and wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 19819 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 70.2032 to 100.1189 deg, Dec +47.7367 to +59.3617 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 70.2032 to 100.1189 deg, Dec 47.7367 to 59.3617 deg
Loaded 11634 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7484 out of 8218 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8218 out of 19819 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.910150
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.910150
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.56
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.35
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.35
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 19819 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 70.2032 to 100.1189 deg, Dec +47.7367 to +59.3617 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 70.2032 to 100.1189 deg, Dec 47.7367 to 59.3617 deg
Loaded 11634 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7484 out of 8218 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8218 out of 19819 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 19771 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 70.2032 to 100.1191 deg, Dec +47.7368 to +59.3412 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 70.2032 to 100.1191 deg, Dec 47.7368 to 59.3412 deg
Loaded 11612 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7500 out of 8210 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8210 out of 19771 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits
2.1 pix Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
3.0 pix fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits
3.0 pix fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits
15.3 mag. Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits
13.7 mag. fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.7 (SNR ) 11.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.IwkUGA7lId (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-13_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_034747_TTUQ1b1x1_2157303_KO5GUZOK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1796, bad_region=0, passed=19819
Got 19819 stars (including 17995 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 19819 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4858 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4817 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4817 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4817 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19819 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4858 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4817 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19819 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4817 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19819 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4817 stars left (next iteration limit 5298)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits N_match=4817 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.431 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.289 n_q1=1188 n_q2=1031 n_q3=1236 n_q4=1362 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.264
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits -region wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.1NbybZTOPQ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-13_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_034747_TTUQ1b1x1_2157303_KO5GUZOK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1769, bad_region=0, passed=19771
Got 19771 stars (including 17975 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 19771 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4856 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4817 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4817 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4817 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19771 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4856 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4817 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19771 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4817 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19771 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4817 stars left (next iteration limit 5298)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits N_match=4817 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.445 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.305 n_q1=1191 n_q2=1033 n_q3=1224 n_q4=1369 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.255
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits -region wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.h4AfkrZWid (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-13_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_034747_TTUQ1b1x1_2157303_KO5GUZOK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-13_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_034747_TTUQ1b1x1_2157303_KO5GUZOK/fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-13_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_034747_TTUQ1b1x1_2157303_KO5GUZOK/fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-13_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_034747_TTUQ1b1x1_2157303_KO5GUZOK/fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-13_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_034747_TTUQ1b1x1_2157303_KO5GUZOK/fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-13_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_034747_TTUQ1b1x1_2157303_KO5GUZOK/fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-13_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_034747_TTUQ1b1x1_2157303_KO5GUZOK/fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-13_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_034747_TTUQ1b1x1_2157303_KO5GUZOK/fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=328, bad_region=0, passed=8248
Got 8248 stars (including 7911 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8248 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 47.9 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4839 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4789 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4789 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4789 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8248 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 47.9 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4840 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4795 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8248 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4795 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8248 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4795 stars left (next iteration limit 5267)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4795 robust_rms=10.085 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=15.612 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4795 robust_rms=0.400 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.460 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4795 robust_rms=0.316 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.353 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4795 robust_rms_before=0.951 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.354 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.316 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.406 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.353
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits
Image size: 942.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:38:31.618 +54:00:01.26 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 8248 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-13_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_034747_TTUQ1b1x1_2157303_KO5GUZOK/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2347304.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.951 -> 0.316 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits N_match=4795 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.310 n_q1=1349 n_q2=1352 n_q3=836 n_q4=1258 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.103
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-13_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_034747_TTUQ1b1x1_2157303_KO5GUZOK/fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.toUbqvOVns (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-13_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_034747_TTUQ1b1x1_2157303_KO5GUZOK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-13_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_034747_TTUQ1b1x1_2157303_KO5GUZOK/fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-13_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_034747_TTUQ1b1x1_2157303_KO5GUZOK/fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-13_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_034747_TTUQ1b1x1_2157303_KO5GUZOK/fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-13_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_034747_TTUQ1b1x1_2157303_KO5GUZOK/fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-13_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_034747_TTUQ1b1x1_2157303_KO5GUZOK/fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-13_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_034747_TTUQ1b1x1_2157303_KO5GUZOK/fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-13_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_034747_TTUQ1b1x1_2157303_KO5GUZOK/fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=316, bad_region=0, passed=7799
Got 7799 stars (including 7477 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7799 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 47.9 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4836 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4789 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4789 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4788 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7799 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 47.9 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4837 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4789 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7799 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4789 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7799 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4789 stars left (next iteration limit 5266)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4789 robust_rms=9.443 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=14.329 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4789 robust_rms=0.404 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.424 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4789 robust_rms=0.313 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.356 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4789 robust_rms_before=0.978 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.328 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.313 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.402 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.356
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
Image size: 942.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:38:29.228 +54:00:32.22 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 7799 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-13_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_034747_TTUQ1b1x1_2157303_KO5GUZOK/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2347463.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.978 -> 0.313 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits N_match=4789 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.303 n_q1=1027 n_q2=1424 n_q3=967 n_q4=1371 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.133
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-13_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_034747_TTUQ1b1x1_2157303_KO5GUZOK/fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits sigma_overall=0.341 worst_q_ratio=1.264
ref2=Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits sigma_overall=0.354 worst_q_ratio=1.255
new1=fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits sigma_overall=0.341 worst_q_ratio=1.103
new2=fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits sigma_overall=0.328 worst_q_ratio=1.133
reference average sigma_overall=0.3475 worst_q_ratio=1.2595
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235_astrometric_residuals.png (4817 matched stars from wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236_astrometric_residuals.png (4817 matched stars from wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260_astrometric_residuals.png (4795 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261_astrometric_residuals.png (4789 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-13_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_034747_TTUQ1b1x1_2157303_KO5GUZOK/wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-13_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_034747_TTUQ1b1x1_2157303_KO5GUZOK/wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21177_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261
The candidate 21177_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:31.00 +55:27:14.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13084_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261
The candidate 13084_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:01.69 +50:29:30.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Aur-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-13_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_034747_TTUQ1b1x1_2157303_KO5GUZOK/fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-13_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_034747_TTUQ1b1x1_2157303_KO5GUZOK/fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-13_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_034747_TTUQ1b1x1_2157303_KO5GUZOK/fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-13_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_034747_TTUQ1b1x1_2157303_KO5GUZOK/fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:38:52.744 +53:59:24.28 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits
Image size: 942.0'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:38:31.602 +54:00:02.17 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:38:52.744 +53:59:24.28
Second-epoch image center 05:38:31.602 +54:00:02.17
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0528 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
Image size: 942.0'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:38:29.207 +54:00:33.16 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:38:52.744 +53:59:24.28
Second-epoch image center 05:38:29.207 +54:00:33.16
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0607 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:38:31.602 +54:00:02.17
Second-epoch second image center 05:38:29.207 +54:00:33.16
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01042 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UGqNRFnVSG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bTaWucGhZQ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-13_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_034747_TTUQ1b1x1_2157303_KO5GUZOK/fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nvvNApQr6O
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-13_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_034747_TTUQ1b1x1_2157303_KO5GUZOK/fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-13_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_034747_TTUQ1b1x1_2157303_KO5GUZOK/fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits &> /tmp/tmp.21YmvmeBSY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-13_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_034747_TTUQ1b1x1_2157303_KO5GUZOK/fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits and wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits and wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits and wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 142069 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 70.1251 to 100.1985 deg, Dec +47.6928 to +59.3619 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 70.1251 to 100.1985 deg, Dec 47.6928 to 59.3619 deg
Loaded 11744 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6276 out of 8345 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8345 out of 142069 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.773000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.773000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.26
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.51
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.51
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 142069 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 70.1251 to 100.1985 deg, Dec +47.6928 to +59.3619 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 70.1251 to 100.1985 deg, Dec 47.6928 to 59.3619 deg
Loaded 11744 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6276 out of 8345 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8345 out of 142069 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 142378 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 70.1601 to 100.1988 deg, Dec +47.6936 to +59.3541 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 70.1601 to 100.1988 deg, Dec 47.6936 to 59.3541 deg
Loaded 11720 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6294 out of 8348 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8348 out of 142378 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 79 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits
2.0 pix Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
2.8 pix fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits
2.8 pix fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits
15.5 mag. Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.9 (SNR ) 13.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.UGqNRFnVSG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-13_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_034747_TTUQ1b1x1_2157303_KO5GUZOK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=40, blended=15126, bad_region=1, passed=142029
Got 142029 stars (including 126648 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 142029 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4856 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4837 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4837 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4837 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 142029 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4857 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4835 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 142029 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4835 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 142029 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4835 stars left (next iteration limit 5320)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits N_match=4835 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.401 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.282 n_q1=1195 n_q2=1063 n_q3=1229 n_q4=1348 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.218
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits -region wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.bTaWucGhZQ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-13_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_034747_TTUQ1b1x1_2157303_KO5GUZOK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=45, blended=15255, bad_region=2, passed=142333
Got 142333 stars (including 126844 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 142333 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4857 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4839 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4839 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4839 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 142333 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4857 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4838 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 142333 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4838 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 142333 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4838 stars left (next iteration limit 5322)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits N_match=4838 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.406 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.294 n_q1=1190 n_q2=1053 n_q3=1236 n_q4=1359 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.196
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits -region wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.nvvNApQr6O (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-13_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_034747_TTUQ1b1x1_2157303_KO5GUZOK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-13_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_034747_TTUQ1b1x1_2157303_KO5GUZOK/fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-13_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_034747_TTUQ1b1x1_2157303_KO5GUZOK/fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-13_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_034747_TTUQ1b1x1_2157303_KO5GUZOK/fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-13_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_034747_TTUQ1b1x1_2157303_KO5GUZOK/fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-13_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_034747_TTUQ1b1x1_2157303_KO5GUZOK/fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-13_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_034747_TTUQ1b1x1_2157303_KO5GUZOK/fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-13_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_034747_TTUQ1b1x1_2157303_KO5GUZOK/fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=2640, bad_region=8, passed=54598
Got 54598 stars (including 51881 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 54598 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4839 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4793 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4793 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4793 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 54598 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4840 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4795 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 54598 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4795 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 54598 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4795 stars left (next iteration limit 5272)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits N_match=4795 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.384 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.303 n_q1=1346 n_q2=1299 n_q3=865 n_q4=1285 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.140
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-13_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_034747_TTUQ1b1x1_2157303_KO5GUZOK/fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.21YmvmeBSY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-13_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_034747_TTUQ1b1x1_2157303_KO5GUZOK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-13_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_034747_TTUQ1b1x1_2157303_KO5GUZOK/fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-13_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_034747_TTUQ1b1x1_2157303_KO5GUZOK/fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-13_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_034747_TTUQ1b1x1_2157303_KO5GUZOK/fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-13_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_034747_TTUQ1b1x1_2157303_KO5GUZOK/fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-13_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_034747_TTUQ1b1x1_2157303_KO5GUZOK/fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-13_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_034747_TTUQ1b1x1_2157303_KO5GUZOK/fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-13_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_034747_TTUQ1b1x1_2157303_KO5GUZOK/fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=1, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=2380, bad_region=9, passed=51373
Got 51373 stars (including 48945 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 51373 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4834 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4790 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4790 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4790 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51373 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4835 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4790 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51373 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4790 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51373 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4790 stars left (next iteration limit 5269)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits N_match=4790 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.287 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.284 n_q1=1052 n_q2=1361 n_q3=990 n_q4=1387 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.214
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-13_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_034747_TTUQ1b1x1_2157303_KO5GUZOK/fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-13_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_034747_TTUQ1b1x1_2157303_KO5GUZOK/wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-46-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0260.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-13_CI_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_034747_TTUQ1b1x1_2157303_KO5GUZOK/wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits at 05:46:51.39 +57:36:51.2: 11.70 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits at 05:05:24.68 +50:26:19.0: 13.23 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits at 04:53:08.09 +54:47:56.8: 12.08 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits at 05:09:31.23 +52:22:20.4: 13.82 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits at 05:42:08.65 +53:05:44.4: 14.20 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits at 05:08:03.74 +51:09:45.4: 13.22 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits at 05:43:20.08 +52:30:11.8: 12.74 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits at 04:53:08.09 +54:47:56.8: 12.13 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits at 05:46:51.39 +57:36:51.2: 11.74 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits at 05:09:31.23 +52:22:20.4: 13.78 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits at 05:42:08.65 +53:05:44.4: 14.05 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits at 05:08:03.74 +51:09:45.4: 13.30 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits at 05:05:24.68 +50:26:19.0: 13.18 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.10 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.72 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:53:08.09 +54:47:56.8: ref_mag=12.10 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3117 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:46:51.39 +57:36:51.2: ref_mag=11.72 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.5519 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.11 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:09:31.23 +52:22:20.4: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4445 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:42:08.65 +53:05:44.4: ref_mag=14.11 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6140 delta=0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:08:03.74 +51:09:45.4: ref_mag=13.25 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2062 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.20 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:05:24.68 +50:26:19.0: ref_mag=13.20 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0258 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits at 05:43:20.08 +52:30:11.8: 12.77 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.75 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:43:20.08 +52:30:11.8: ref_mag=12.75 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2488 delta=0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits at 05:32:02.84 +51:15:07.5: 12.93 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits at 05:46:46.03 +56:56:36.0: 13.10 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits at 05:25:08.81 +55:23:47.9: 13.12 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits at 05:32:02.84 +51:15:07.5: 12.89 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.91 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:32:02.84 +51:15:07.5: ref_mag=12.91 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4394 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits at 05:39:19.04 +56:04:19.2: 13.25 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits at 05:34:48.75 +53:42:22.0: 13.52 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits at 05:37:06.98 +56:04:05.9: 13.51 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits at 05:25:08.81 +55:23:47.9: 13.09 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits at 05:46:46.03 +56:56:36.0: 13.11 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.10 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:25:08.81 +55:23:47.9: ref_mag=13.10 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7589 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.11 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:46:46.03 +56:56:36.0: ref_mag=13.11 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7511 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits at 05:31:18.88 +51:17:17.6: 13.67 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits at 05:39:19.04 +56:04:19.2: 13.27 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.26 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:39:19.04 +56:04:19.2: ref_mag=13.26 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9522 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits at 05:34:48.75 +53:42:22.0: 13.58 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.55 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:34:48.75 +53:42:22.0: ref_mag=13.55 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1291 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits at 05:37:06.98 +56:04:05.9: 13.47 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.49 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:37:06.98 +56:04:05.9: ref_mag=13.49 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1464 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits at 05:33:54.62 +52:34:09.4: 13.90 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits at 05:54:40.92 +55:40:35.3: 13.64 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits at 05:31:18.88 +51:17:17.6: 13.72 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.70 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:31:18.88 +51:17:17.6: ref_mag=13.70 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2803 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits at 05:41:35.46 +53:28:06.0: 13.79 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits at 05:33:54.62 +52:34:09.4: 13.99 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits at 05:54:40.92 +55:40:35.3: 13.65 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.94 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:33:54.62 +52:34:09.4: ref_mag=13.94 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2060 delta=0.73 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.65 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:54:40.92 +55:40:35.3: ref_mag=13.65 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2490 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits at 05:41:35.46 +53:28:06.0: 13.73 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:41:35.46 +53:28:06.0: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3825 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits at 05:38:24.08 +52:25:14.4: 14.19 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits at 05:40:15.15 +54:17:11.4: 14.47 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits at 05:40:15.15 +54:17:11.4: 14.27 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits at 05:38:24.08 +52:25:14.4: 14.12 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.36 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.15 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:40:15.15 +54:17:11.4: ref_mag=14.36 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.5227 delta=0.84 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:38:24.08 +52:25:14.4: ref_mag=14.15 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2143 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits at 05:39:42.60 +50:54:24.4: 13.67 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits at 05:34:27.54 +56:41:08.3: 13.58 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits at 05:54:03.25 +53:30:54.6: 14.63 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits at 05:39:42.60 +50:54:24.4: 13.72 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.69 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:39:42.60 +50:54:24.4: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.7548 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits at 05:34:27.54 +56:41:08.3: 13.57 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:34:27.54 +56:41:08.3: ref_mag=13.58 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6597 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits at 05:33:57.95 +52:48:27.7: 13.19 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits at 05:54:03.25 +53:30:54.6: 14.73 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.67 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:54:03.25 +53:30:54.6: ref_mag=14.67 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.4123 delta=1.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits at 05:33:57.95 +52:48:27.7: 13.17 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.18 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:33:57.95 +52:48:27.7: ref_mag=13.18 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.2208 delta=0.96 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits at 05:36:01.97 +52:39:07.3: 12.71 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits at 05:34:29.23 +53:49:45.0: 13.67 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits at 05:36:01.97 +52:39:07.3: 12.69 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.70 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:36:01.97 +52:39:07.3: ref_mag=12.70 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7884 delta=0.91 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits at 05:54:16.47 +53:37:24.3: 14.22 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits at 05:34:29.23 +53:49:45.0: 13.64 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.65 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:34:29.23 +53:49:45.0: ref_mag=13.65 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1686 delta=0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits at 05:28:49.55 +52:47:22.5: 13.82 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-48-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0235.fits at 05:28:13.91 +55:09:36.8: 14.13 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits at 05:54:16.47 +53:37:24.3: 14.31 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.26 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:54:16.47 +53:37:24.3: ref_mag=14.26 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.1534 delta=1.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits at 05:28:49.55 +52:47:22.5: 13.65 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.72 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:28:49.55 +52:47:22.5: ref_mag=13.72 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0218 delta=0.70 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-49-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits at 05:28:13.91 +55:09:36.8: 14.08 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.10 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:28:13.91 +55:09:36.8: ref_mag=14.10 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.9926 delta=1.11 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out124418.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out29351.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out48599.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out65554.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out67098.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out81125.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out83066.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out85571.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 164930_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261
The candidate 164930_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 164932_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261
The candidate 164932_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 164951_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261
The candidate 164951_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 164952_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261
The candidate 164952_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:59:46.43 +55:17:31.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 164962_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261
The candidate 164962_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:08:48.81 +50:29:05.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 164963_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261
The candidate 164963_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 164975_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261
The candidate 164975_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:55.80 +58:48:29.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 164978_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261
The candidate 164978_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 164980_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261
The candidate 164980_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 165033_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261
The candidate 165033_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:21.22 +58:57:53.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 165080_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261
The candidate 165080_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:44.56 +54:23:38.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 165084_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261
The candidate 165084_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:21:46.45 +53:12:12.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 165093_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261
The candidate 165093_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:59:50.18 +54:15:32.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 165115_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261
The candidate 165115_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 165123_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261
The candidate 165123_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:05.62 +51:06:01.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 165125_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261
The candidate 165125_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:12.97 +55:41:07.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 165136_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261
The candidate 165136_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:34.32 +57:02:39.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 165138_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261
The candidate 165138_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:32:37.04 +57:49:51.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 165150_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261
The candidate 165150_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 165162_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261
The candidate 165162_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:47:51.84 +56:44:18.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 165166_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261
The candidate 165166_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 165174_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261
The candidate 165174_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:08.27 +51:03:28.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 165223_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261
The candidate 165223_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:14:53.44 +51:20:55.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 165238_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261
The candidate 165238_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:57:08.26 +49:03:06.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 165240_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261
The candidate 165240_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 165245_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261
The candidate 165245_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:25:03.53 +53:56:50.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 165259_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261
The candidate 165259_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:25.77 +52:43:38.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 165274_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261
The candidate 165274_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:45.91 +54:45:59.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 165292_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261
The candidate 165292_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 165294_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261
The candidate 165294_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 165296_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261
The candidate 165296_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 165305_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261
The candidate 165305_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:23.19 +55:14:57.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 165310_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261
The candidate 165310_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:02.91 +55:42:08.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 165325_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261
The candidate 165325_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:43:25.74 +52:30:37.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 165328_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261
The candidate 165328_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:08:15.12 +54:54:36.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 165329_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261
The candidate 165329_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:05.65 +56:24:25.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 165342_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261
The candidate 165342_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 165348_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261
The candidate 165348_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:06.74 +54:48:07.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 165360_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261
The candidate 165360_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:50.20 +50:34:20.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 165364_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261
The candidate 165364_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:00.52 +56:56:34.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 165365_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261
The candidate 165365_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 165368_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261
The candidate 165368_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:35.63 +52:39:14.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 165380_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261
The candidate 165380_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 165387_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261
The candidate 165387_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 165389_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261
The candidate 165389_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 165395_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261
The candidate 165395_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:31.63 +54:41:47.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 165465_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261
The candidate 165465_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:24.63 +56:05:10.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 165469_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261
The candidate 165469_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:20.47 +54:56:25.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 165471_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261
The candidate 165471_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:20.87 +56:08:15.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62965_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261
The candidate 62965_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:11.21 +54:04:06.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85571_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261
Preparing report for the candidate 85571_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59106_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261
The candidate 59106_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61423_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261
The candidate 61423_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:25:08.75 +54:10:42.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91392_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261
The candidate 91392_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:50:24.74 +51:50:18.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157672_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261
The candidate 157672_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:11:44.46 +54:17:59.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115804_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261
The candidate 115804_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:08.34 +50:18:38.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 124418_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261
Preparing report for the candidate 124418_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 38016_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261
The candidate 38016_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:51.02 +55:53:06.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05458_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261
The candidate 05458_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:52:06.87 +58:38:04.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29351_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261
Preparing report for the candidate 29351_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116143_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261
The candidate 116143_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:37.07 +50:14:49.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67098_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261
Preparing report for the candidate 67098_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127961_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261
The candidate 127961_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:05.31 +50:59:10.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 42859_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261
The candidate 42859_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:49.59 +55:32:42.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39295_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261
The candidate 39295_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:31.01 +55:27:14.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81125_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261
Preparing report for the candidate 81125_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131743_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261
The candidate 131743_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:55.82 +51:37:35.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79981_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261
The candidate 79981_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:35.94 +52:48:47.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55555_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261
The candidate 55555_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:49.43 +54:21:40.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90823_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261
The candidate 90823_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:56.69 +52:02:31.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79765_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261
The candidate 79765_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:05:39.47 +52:24:22.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83066_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261
Preparing report for the candidate 83066_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131717_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261
The candidate 131717_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (39.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95235_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261
The candidate 95235_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:01.67 +50:29:31.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66117_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261
The candidate 66117_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65554_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261
Preparing report for the candidate 65554_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81424_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261
The candidate 81424_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 48599_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261
Preparing report for the candidate 48599_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126898_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261
The candidate 126898_fd_Aur-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-13_03-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0261 did not pass the final checks
