This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050959_TTUQ1b1x1_28509_rT4j6uUp
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461264.9228,6.72,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260812.4228 6.72CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 12.4228 2461264.9228 9.12 05:58:04.97 +22:18:25.6
187.13377 -0.96738 galactic Ori Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 8.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1 Ceres 0 1 1 9.0 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:58:04.97 +22:18:25.6: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 05:58:04.97 +22:18:25.6: 15.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 12.4228* 05 58 04.97 +22 18 25.6 9.1 U Ori 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461264.9228,9.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260812.4228 9.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 12.4228 2461264.9228 11.26 06:11:23.64 +22:54:16.3
188.11918 2.00307 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 7.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.27 Euterpe 0 -0 0 11.6 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:11:23.64 +22:54:16.3: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:11:23.64 +22:54:16.3: 15.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461264.9228,11.26,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260812.4228 11.26CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461264.9228,7.19,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260812.4228 7.19CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 12.4228 2461264.9228 12.13 06:18:32.08 +24:40:45.2
187.33158 4.28320 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 7.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.30 Urania 0 0 0 12.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:18:32.08 +24:40:45.2: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:18:32.08 +24:40:45.2: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461264.9228,12.13,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260812.4228 12.13CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 12.4228 2461264.9228 13.30 06:05:56.19 +19:55:56.4
190.10352 -0.54847 galactic Ori Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 8.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.712 Boliviana -0 1 1 13.4 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:05:56.19 +19:55:56.4: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:05:56.19 +19:55:56.4: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 12.4228* 06 05 56.19 +19 55 56.4 13.3 U Ori 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461264.9228,13.30,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260812.4228 13.30CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 12.4228 2461264.9228 12.98 06:34:49.30 +25:54:06.7
187.92536 8.11699 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 7.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.111 Ate -0 1 1 13.4 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:34:49.30 +25:54:06.7: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:34:49.30 +25:54:06.7: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461264.9228,12.98,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260812.4228 12.98CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 12.4228 2461264.9228 13.09 06:18:09.76 +24:26:30.2
187.50208 4.09706 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 7.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" NSVS J0618096+242632
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
16.530 g Y 1.295 g 2458384.99210 419.376701900000 C
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:18:09.76 +24:26:30.2: 14.41 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:18:09.76 +24:26:30.2: 13.86 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.03 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0618096+242632,2461264.9228,13.09,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0618096+242632 20260812.4228 13.09CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 12.4228 2461264.9228 12.97 06:20:33.55 +21:37:14.9
190.25761 3.26044 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 8.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ZTF J062033.56+213714.0
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.988 r Y 0.180 r 2458525.32090 64.553305600000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:20:33.55 +21:37:14.9: 13.94 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:20:33.55 +21:37:14.9: 13.83 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ZTF J062033.56+213714.0,2461264.9228,12.97,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ZTF J062033.56+213714.0 20260812.4228 12.97CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.61760534 18.01.2026 02:49:11.101 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
First image: 2461058.61760534 18.01.2026 02:49:11.101 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Last image: 2461264.92313540 12.08.2026 10:09:08.899 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050959_TTUQ1b1x1_28509_rT4j6uUp/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 10
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.79
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 27690
Objects passed selection criteria: 27627
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 20941.2
Average stars matched: 19810.5 (94.6004 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 253896 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Aug 6 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-190-gdf2934b0
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Aug 12 05:11:35 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.61760534 18.01.2026 02:49:11.101 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
First image: 2461058.61760534 18.01.2026 02:49:11.101 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Last image: 2461264.92313540 12.08.2026 10:09:08.899 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050959_TTUQ1b1x1_28509_rT4j6uUp/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 184
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.47
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 60 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 177356
Objects passed selection criteria: 176978
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 138296
Average stars matched: 133906 (96.8253 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 511680 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Aug 6 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-190-gdf2934b0
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Aug 12 05:13:35 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050959_TTUQ1b1x1_28509_rT4j6uUp/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050959_TTUQ1b1x1_28509_rT4j6uUp/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050959_TTUQ1b1x1_28509_rT4j6uUp/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050959_TTUQ1b1x1_28509_rT4j6uUp/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461264.92243265
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits'
wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits'
wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Image size: 941.8'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:27:40.095 +22:00:29.68 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
Image size: 945.1'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:27:35.274 +21:58:31.36 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:27:40.095 +22:00:29.68
Second-epoch image center 06:27:35.274 +21:58:31.36
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0378 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
Image size: 944.9'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:27:38.049 +21:58:03.58 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:27:40.095 +22:00:29.68
Second-epoch image center 06:27:38.049 +21:58:03.58
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0413 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 06:27:35.274 +21:58:31.36
Second-epoch second image center 06:27:38.049 +21:58:03.58
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01321 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits &> /tmp/tmp.r7HgS5zKaM
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits &> /tmp/tmp.IjI9wUImJU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050959_TTUQ1b1x1_28509_rT4j6uUp/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JExCCZqgmb
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050959_TTUQ1b1x1_28509_rT4j6uUp/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050959_TTUQ1b1x1_28509_rT4j6uUp/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits &> /tmp/tmp.BtrvRlejDz
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050959_TTUQ1b1x1_28509_rT4j6uUp/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits and wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits and wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits and wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 29338 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 87.9455 to 105.5063 deg, Dec +16.3282 to +27.3630 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 87.9455 to 105.5063 deg, Dec 16.3282 to 27.3630 deg
Loaded 19945 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 14221 out of 15960 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 15960 out of 29338 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.881900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.881900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.79
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.09
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.09
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 29338 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 87.9455 to 105.5063 deg, Dec +16.3282 to +27.3630 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 87.9455 to 105.5063 deg, Dec 16.3282 to 27.3630 deg
Loaded 19945 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 14221 out of 15960 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 15960 out of 29338 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 31529 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 88.2224 to 105.7491 deg, Dec +16.5172 to +27.2358 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 88.2224 to 105.7491 deg, Dec 16.5172 to 27.2358 deg
Loaded 19341 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 14457 out of 15956 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 15956 out of 31529 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits (aperture=6.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 9 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
2.5 pix Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
2.8 pix fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
2.8 pix fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
15.1 mag. Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.8 (SNR ) 11.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.r7HgS5zKaM (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050959_TTUQ1b1x1_28509_rT4j6uUp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3278, bad_region=0, passed=29338
Got 29338 stars (including 26023 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29338 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4877 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4817 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4818 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4817 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29338 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4876 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4819 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29338 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4819 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29338 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 4819 stars left (next iteration limit 5298)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits N_match=4819 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.320 n_q1=1143 n_q2=1240 n_q3=1197 n_q4=1239 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.175
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -region wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.IjI9wUImJU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050959_TTUQ1b1x1_28509_rT4j6uUp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3030, bad_region=0, passed=31529
Got 31529 stars (including 28473 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31529 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4874 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4815 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4816 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4815 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31529 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4872 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4817 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31529 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4816 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31529 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Excluding outliers - 4816 stars left (next iteration limit 5296)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits N_match=4816 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.530 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.684 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.485 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.619 n_q1=1184 n_q2=1326 n_q3=1090 n_q4=1216 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.289
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits -region wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.JExCCZqgmb (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050959_TTUQ1b1x1_28509_rT4j6uUp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050959_TTUQ1b1x1_28509_rT4j6uUp/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050959_TTUQ1b1x1_28509_rT4j6uUp/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050959_TTUQ1b1x1_28509_rT4j6uUp/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050959_TTUQ1b1x1_28509_rT4j6uUp/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050959_TTUQ1b1x1_28509_rT4j6uUp/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050959_TTUQ1b1x1_28509_rT4j6uUp/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050959_TTUQ1b1x1_28509_rT4j6uUp/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=4, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=601, bad_region=0, passed=11659
Got 11659 stars (including 11044 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11659 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013126 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010501 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4846 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4785 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4787 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4785 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11659 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4849 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4785 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11659 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4784 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11659 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 4784 stars left (next iteration limit 5263)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4784 robust_rms=6.827 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=15.937 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4784 robust_rms=0.497 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.683 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4784 robust_rms=0.424 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.626 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4784 robust_rms_before=1.465 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.434 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.424 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.518 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.626
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.518 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits N_match=4784 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.423 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.430 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.523 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.455 n_q1=1390 n_q2=792 n_q3=1606 n_q4=996 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.235
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050959_TTUQ1b1x1_28509_rT4j6uUp/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.BtrvRlejDz (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050959_TTUQ1b1x1_28509_rT4j6uUp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050959_TTUQ1b1x1_28509_rT4j6uUp/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050959_TTUQ1b1x1_28509_rT4j6uUp/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050959_TTUQ1b1x1_28509_rT4j6uUp/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050959_TTUQ1b1x1_28509_rT4j6uUp/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050959_TTUQ1b1x1_28509_rT4j6uUp/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050959_TTUQ1b1x1_28509_rT4j6uUp/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050959_TTUQ1b1x1_28509_rT4j6uUp/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=618, bad_region=0, passed=11749
Got 11749 stars (including 11124 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11749 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013124 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010499 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4849 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4793 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4794 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4792 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11749 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4852 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11749 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11749 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 4791 stars left (next iteration limit 5271)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4791 robust_rms=6.870 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=14.919 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4791 robust_rms=0.466 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.697 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4791 robust_rms=0.419 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.532 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4791 robust_rms_before=1.368 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.443 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.419 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.519 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.532
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.519 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits N_match=4791 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.425 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.406 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.502 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.458 n_q1=1391 n_q2=802 n_q3=1595 n_q4=1003 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.182
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050959_TTUQ1b1x1_28509_rT4j6uUp/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits sigma_overall=0.370 worst_q_ratio=1.175
ref2=Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits sigma_overall=0.530 worst_q_ratio=1.289
new1=fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits sigma_overall=0.423 worst_q_ratio=1.235
new2=fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits sigma_overall=0.425 worst_q_ratio=1.182
reference average sigma_overall=0.45 worst_q_ratio=1.232
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_astrometric_residuals.png (4819 matched stars from wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041_astrometric_residuals.png (4816 matched stars from wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.51 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296_astrometric_residuals.png (4784 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.40 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297_astrometric_residuals.png (4791 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.39 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050959_TTUQ1b1x1_28509_rT4j6uUp/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050959_TTUQ1b1x1_28509_rT4j6uUp/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:11:23.64 +22:54:16.3: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:58:04.97 +22:18:25.6: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 05:58:04.97 +22:18:25.6: 15.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:11:23.64 +22:54:16.3: 15.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out34177.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out34393.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34165_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 34165_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:22.71 +25:14:09.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34166_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
Preparing report for the candidate 34166_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34177_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
Preparing report for the candidate 34177_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34295_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 34295_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:03.69 +23:20:13.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34349_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 34349_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:51.70 +24:02:08.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34393_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
Preparing report for the candidate 34393_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04011_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 04011_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:27:15.35 +18:04:24.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15017_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 15017_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:30:22.96 +22:04:28.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02227_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 02227_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:18:16.08 +17:21:08.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 9s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
05:58:04.97 +22:18:25.6
06:11:23.64 +22:54:16.3
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050959_TTUQ1b1x1_28509_rT4j6uUp/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050959_TTUQ1b1x1_28509_rT4j6uUp/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050959_TTUQ1b1x1_28509_rT4j6uUp/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050959_TTUQ1b1x1_28509_rT4j6uUp/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Image size: 941.8'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:27:40.095 +22:00:29.68 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
Image size: 945.1'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:27:35.274 +21:58:31.36 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:27:40.095 +22:00:29.68
Second-epoch image center 06:27:35.274 +21:58:31.36
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0378 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
Image size: 944.9'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:27:38.049 +21:58:03.58 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:27:40.095 +22:00:29.68
Second-epoch image center 06:27:38.049 +21:58:03.58
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0413 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 06:27:35.274 +21:58:31.36
Second-epoch second image center 06:27:38.049 +21:58:03.58
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01321 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits &> /tmp/tmp.VCIcmCsROM
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits &> /tmp/tmp.C84Iy7ixgA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050959_TTUQ1b1x1_28509_rT4j6uUp/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XahBnHqs8b
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050959_TTUQ1b1x1_28509_rT4j6uUp/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050959_TTUQ1b1x1_28509_rT4j6uUp/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits &> /tmp/tmp.sfXEleAcWv
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050959_TTUQ1b1x1_28509_rT4j6uUp/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits and wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits and wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits and wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 206292 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 87.9318 to 105.5265 deg, Dec +16.3091 to +27.3656 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 87.9318 to 105.5265 deg, Dec 16.3091 to 27.3656 deg
Loaded 20018 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11191 out of 16872 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16872 out of 206292 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.736100
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.736100
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.47
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.27
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.27
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 206292 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 87.9318 to 105.5265 deg, Dec +16.3091 to +27.3656 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 87.9318 to 105.5265 deg, Dec 16.3091 to 27.3656 deg
Loaded 20018 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11191 out of 16872 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16872 out of 206292 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 188638 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 88.2221 to 105.7490 deg, Dec +16.4980 to +27.2397 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 88.2221 to 105.7490 deg, Dec 16.4980 to 27.2397 deg
Loaded 19379 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11515 out of 16583 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16583 out of 188638 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits (aperture=5.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 167 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
2.4 pix Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
2.7 pix fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
2.7 pix fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
15.2 mag. Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.9 (SNR ) 13.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.VCIcmCsROM (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050959_TTUQ1b1x1_28509_rT4j6uUp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=47, blended=31903, bad_region=2, passed=206245
Got 206245 stars (including 174023 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 206245 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4833 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4792 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 206245 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4832 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 206245 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 206245 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 4791 stars left (next iteration limit 5270)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits N_match=4791 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.422 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.296 n_q1=1106 n_q2=1277 n_q3=1178 n_q4=1230 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.183
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -region wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.C84Iy7ixgA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050959_TTUQ1b1x1_28509_rT4j6uUp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=44, blended=29566, bad_region=0, passed=188594
Got 188594 stars (including 158851 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 188594 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4841 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4796 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4797 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4796 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 188594 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4840 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4797 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 188594 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4797 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 188594 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Excluding outliers - 4797 stars left (next iteration limit 5275)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits N_match=4797 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.514 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.647 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.512 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.569 n_q1=1146 n_q2=1371 n_q3=1051 n_q4=1229 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.258
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits -region wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.XahBnHqs8b (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050959_TTUQ1b1x1_28509_rT4j6uUp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050959_TTUQ1b1x1_28509_rT4j6uUp/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050959_TTUQ1b1x1_28509_rT4j6uUp/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050959_TTUQ1b1x1_28509_rT4j6uUp/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050959_TTUQ1b1x1_28509_rT4j6uUp/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050959_TTUQ1b1x1_28509_rT4j6uUp/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050959_TTUQ1b1x1_28509_rT4j6uUp/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050959_TTUQ1b1x1_28509_rT4j6uUp/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=5136, bad_region=12, passed=79963
Got 79963 stars (including 74707 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 79963 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013126 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010501 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4840 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4781 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4784 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4781 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 79963 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4845 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4782 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 79963 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4782 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 79963 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 4782 stars left (next iteration limit 5259)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits N_match=4782 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.430 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.525 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.473 n_q1=1384 n_q2=763 n_q3=1613 n_q4=1022 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.203
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050959_TTUQ1b1x1_28509_rT4j6uUp/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.sfXEleAcWv (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050959_TTUQ1b1x1_28509_rT4j6uUp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050959_TTUQ1b1x1_28509_rT4j6uUp/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050959_TTUQ1b1x1_28509_rT4j6uUp/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050959_TTUQ1b1x1_28509_rT4j6uUp/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050959_TTUQ1b1x1_28509_rT4j6uUp/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050959_TTUQ1b1x1_28509_rT4j6uUp/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050959_TTUQ1b1x1_28509_rT4j6uUp/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050959_TTUQ1b1x1_28509_rT4j6uUp/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=5290, bad_region=14, passed=81541
Got 81541 stars (including 76136 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 81541 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013124 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010499 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4839 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4777 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4780 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4777 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 81541 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4843 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4776 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 81541 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4776 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 81541 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 4776 stars left (next iteration limit 5254)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits N_match=4776 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.441 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.428 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.523 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.464 n_q1=1386 n_q2=772 n_q3=1590 n_q4=1028 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.188
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050959_TTUQ1b1x1_28509_rT4j6uUp/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050959_TTUQ1b1x1_28509_rT4j6uUp/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-08-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_050959_TTUQ1b1x1_28509_rT4j6uUp/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:56:29.13 +17:57:14.5: 11.92 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:54:00.60 +23:48:43.4: 12.88 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:03:20.39 +22:13:13.8: 13.72 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:08:24.71 +22:08:54.9: 13.44 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:23:16.20 +21:55:05.6: 13.05 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:23:16.20 +21:55:05.6: 12.95 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:54:00.60 +23:48:43.4: 12.69 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:56:29.13 +17:57:14.5: 12.05 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:03:20.39 +22:13:13.8: 13.65 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.00 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.77 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:23:16.20 +21:55:05.6: ref_mag=13.00 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8819 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.97 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:54:00.60 +23:48:43.4: ref_mag=12.77 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7034 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:08:24.71 +22:08:54.9: 13.24 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:56:29.13 +17:57:14.5: ref_mag=11.97 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4858 delta=-0.51 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.69 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:03:20.39 +22:13:13.8: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5853 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:08:24.71 +22:08:54.9: ref_mag=13.33 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3393 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:16:58.26 +25:30:22.7: 13.08 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:16:58.26 +25:30:22.7: 12.98 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.03 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:16:58.26 +25:30:22.7: ref_mag=13.03 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9336 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:47:49.59 +23:20:54.5: 11.88 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:43:52.47 +23:55:56.9: 12.13 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:07:27.78 +24:05:48.5: 12.53 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:47:49.59 +23:20:54.5: 11.72 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.79 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:47:49.59 +23:20:54.5: ref_mag=11.79 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7254 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:43:02.10 +21:22:52.0: 11.63 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:43:52.47 +23:55:56.9: 12.05 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:07:27.78 +24:05:48.5: 12.35 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.09 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:43:52.47 +23:55:56.9: ref_mag=12.09 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1114 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.41 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:07:27.78 +24:05:48.5: ref_mag=12.41 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.2494 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:28:55.66 +20:16:16.8: 11.62 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:43:02.10 +21:22:52.0: 11.55 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.59 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:43:02.10 +21:22:52.0: ref_mag=11.59 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6150 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:28:55.66 +20:16:16.8: 11.57 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.60 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:28:55.66 +20:16:16.8: ref_mag=11.60 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.3541 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:18:32.08 +24:40:45.2: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:18:32.08 +24:40:45.2: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:15:48.10 +24:04:01.5: 12.75 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:55:24.13 +20:11:41.2: 11.75 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:17:16.86 +22:09:31.8: 12.76 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:15:48.10 +24:04:01.5: 12.78 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.76 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:15:48.10 +24:04:01.5: ref_mag=12.76 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6337 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:55:24.13 +20:11:41.2: 11.70 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.72 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:55:24.13 +20:11:41.2: ref_mag=11.72 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9307 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:17:16.86 +22:09:31.8: 12.79 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.77 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:17:16.86 +22:09:31.8: ref_mag=12.77 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6830 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:24:44.99 +25:04:18.4: 13.10 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:38:49.42 +21:52:44.8: 12.42 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:24:44.99 +25:04:18.4: 13.07 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.08 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:24:44.99 +25:04:18.4: ref_mag=13.08 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8457 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:22:18.07 +25:35:56.3: 13.31 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:38:49.42 +21:52:44.8: 12.28 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.34 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:38:49.42 +21:52:44.8: ref_mag=12.34 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4036 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:57:43.82 +24:45:44.8: 13.38 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:20:40.86 +18:02:28.9: 12.87 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:09:22.97 +24:17:46.5: 13.51 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:22:18.07 +25:35:56.3: 13.33 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.32 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:22:18.07 +25:35:56.3: ref_mag=13.32 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0575 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:43:30.83 +22:39:23.0: 13.13 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:20:40.86 +18:02:28.9: 12.77 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 05:57:43.82 +24:45:44.8: 13.46 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.81 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:20:40.86 +18:02:28.9: ref_mag=12.81 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7137 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.41 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:57:43.82 +24:45:44.8: ref_mag=13.41 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3800 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:09:22.97 +24:17:46.5: 13.41 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.45 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:09:22.97 +24:17:46.5: ref_mag=13.45 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.2279 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:43:30.83 +22:39:23.0: 13.00 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.06 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:43:30.83 +22:39:23.0: ref_mag=13.06 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7529 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:20:55.60 +23:58:53.1: 13.23 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:19:48.06 +24:59:23.9: 13.31 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:54:41.71 +22:04:11.6: 13.53 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:20:55.60 +23:58:53.1: 13.20 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.21 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:20:55.60 +23:58:53.1: ref_mag=13.21 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0279 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:19:48.06 +24:59:23.9: 13.29 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.30 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:19:48.06 +24:59:23.9: ref_mag=13.30 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1909 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:12:44.55 +26:45:53.4: 13.48 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 05:54:41.71 +22:04:11.6: 13.50 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.51 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:54:41.71 +22:04:11.6: ref_mag=13.51 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4099 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:19:15.74 +26:58:11.0: 13.31 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:05:56.19 +19:55:56.4: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:12:44.55 +26:45:53.4: 13.60 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.53 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:12:44.55 +26:45:53.4: ref_mag=13.53 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3231 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:37:48.44 +21:26:58.3: 12.96 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:19:15.74 +26:58:11.0: 13.26 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.29 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:19:15.74 +26:58:11.0: ref_mag=13.29 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0431 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:39:28.31 +22:08:02.3: 12.94 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:05:56.19 +19:55:56.4: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:37:48.44 +21:26:58.3: 12.81 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.87 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:37:48.44 +21:26:58.3: ref_mag=12.87 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9086 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:39:28.31 +22:08:02.3: 12.81 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.87 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:39:28.31 +22:08:02.3: ref_mag=12.87 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8247 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:12:06.93 +22:11:42.8: 14.00 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:34:49.30 +25:54:06.7: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:08:16.42 +23:32:40.4: 13.49 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:22:32.35 +24:02:34.3: 13.63 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:08:16.42 +23:32:40.4: 13.53 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:22:32.35 +24:02:34.3: 13.54 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.51 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:08:16.42 +23:32:40.4: ref_mag=13.51 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4327 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:22:32.35 +24:02:34.3: ref_mag=13.58 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3208 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:12:06.93 +22:11:42.8: 13.90 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:12:06.93 +22:11:42.8: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.3330 delta=0.61 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:34:49.30 +25:54:06.7: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:17:37.37 +24:31:49.1: 13.89 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:34:52.38 +24:18:17.8: 13.20 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:17:53.59 +19:26:21.5: 13.31 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:22:02.28 +24:20:30.7: 13.58 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:17:37.37 +24:31:49.1: 13.72 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:17:37.37 +24:31:49.1: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4794 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:34:52.38 +24:18:17.8: 13.18 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.19 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:34:52.38 +24:18:17.8: ref_mag=13.19 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1631 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:17:53.59 +19:26:21.5: 13.33 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.32 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:17:53.59 +19:26:21.5: ref_mag=13.32 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2236 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:22:02.28 +24:20:30.7: 13.57 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:22:02.28 +24:20:30.7: ref_mag=13.57 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3771 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:18:09.76 +24:26:30.2: 14.41 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:18:09.76 +24:26:30.2: 13.86 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.03 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:18:09.76 +24:26:30.2: ref_mag=14.03 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.0804 delta=0.95 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:20:33.55 +21:37:14.9: 13.94 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:20:33.55 +21:37:14.9: 13.83 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:20:33.55 +21:37:14.9: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.9506 delta=0.93 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out153572.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out231428.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out232546.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out232651.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out97583.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 12s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 6s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230771_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 230771_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:10:56.76 +20:11:24.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230783_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 230783_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230785_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 230785_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230786_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 230786_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230791_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 230791_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:08:17.85 +25:01:13.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230793_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 230793_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230796_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 230796_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:08:01.41 +24:25:09.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230802_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 230802_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230806_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 230806_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:40.54 +18:39:49.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230807_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 230807_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:31:14.81 +22:47:16.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230808_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 230808_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:19.38 +22:46:53.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230814_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 230814_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:02:00.41 +20:16:29.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230816_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 230816_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:08:18.58 +24:19:22.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230817_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 230817_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:18.80 +21:54:48.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230821_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 230821_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:23.55 +25:04:11.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230823_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 230823_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:16:43.96 +23:55:57.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230824_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 230824_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230825_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 230825_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:24.53 +22:16:47.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230828_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 230828_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:49.83 +23:53:02.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230829_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 230829_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:07.42 +23:24:41.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230831_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 230831_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:30:31.08 +26:13:46.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230836_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 230836_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:03.07 +25:11:40.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230840_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 230840_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:13.17 +23:55:08.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230843_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 230843_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230844_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 230844_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:07:29.73 +24:04:31.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230845_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 230845_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:52.64 +22:42:49.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230848_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 230848_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230849_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 230849_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230851_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 230851_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:05.46 +26:33:21.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230852_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 230852_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:51.30 +17:27:04.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230854_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 230854_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230855_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 230855_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:24:22.44 +25:34:52.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230859_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 230859_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:22.73 +25:14:09.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230861_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
Preparing report for the candidate 230861_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230873_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 230873_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:05.00 +22:18:25.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231027_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 231027_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:14:36.56 +22:29:47.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231043_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 231043_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:14:39.85 +22:30:00.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231069_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 231069_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:51.66 +24:02:08.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231141_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 231141_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:11.16 +22:21:16.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231234_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 231234_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231259_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 231259_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:02.94 +23:18:02.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231282_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 231282_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:01.91 +25:55:17.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231290_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 231290_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:29:01.51 +20:10:37.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231311_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 231311_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:15:04.31 +22:32:08.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231336_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 231336_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:14.36 +23:18:09.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231405_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 231405_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:42:14.87 +25:21:40.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231410_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 231410_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:59:37.51 +21:37:19.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231428_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
Preparing report for the candidate 231428_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231482_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 231482_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:42:18.84 +17:38:00.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231570_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 231570_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:33.12 +22:53:16.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231617_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 231617_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:12:01.22 +21:52:18.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231645_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 231645_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:39.02 +24:26:23.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231646_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 231646_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:02:23.01 +26:26:00.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231650_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 231650_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:31:04.52 +16:56:47.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231698_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 231698_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:57:51.94 +25:58:17.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231711_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 231711_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:52:10.80 +19:57:19.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231727_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 231727_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:14:49.70 +22:33:20.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231737_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 231737_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:11.69 +23:13:20.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231792_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 231792_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231796_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 231796_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231815_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 231815_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:19:56.74 +25:01:32.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231898_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 231898_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231915_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 231915_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:27.73 +24:26:14.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231930_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 231930_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:56:02.10 +19:21:53.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231941_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 231941_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:13:49.44 +19:19:43.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231964_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 231964_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:10:45.73 +22:41:58.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231971_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 231971_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:11.68 +25:12:26.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231984_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 231984_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:07:20.24 +24:04:40.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231986_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 231986_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:28.62 +24:23:50.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231999_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 231999_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:55.82 +26:22:16.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232003_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 232003_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:20:42.95 +18:02:30.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232034_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 232034_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:52.13 +18:15:09.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232041_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 232041_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:06:28.96 +23:10:28.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232047_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 232047_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:39:10.02 +25:47:53.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232060_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 232060_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:31:02.36 +16:57:22.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232065_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 232065_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:48.36 +22:42:25.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232067_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 232067_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:08:42.38 +20:26:17.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232074_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 232074_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:33.53 +18:11:15.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232079_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 232079_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232104_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 232104_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:40.07 +25:01:55.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232106_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 232106_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:57:59.94 +25:58:48.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232116_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 232116_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:21.58 +23:37:18.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232117_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 232117_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:05:53.10 +26:35:37.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232126_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 232126_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:37:45.94 +22:43:13.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232135_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 232135_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:32:39.65 +23:08:31.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232140_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 232140_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232146_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 232146_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:02:21.34 +26:25:44.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232171_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 232171_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:18:45.99 +21:10:54.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232173_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 232173_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:04.70 +24:51:56.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232183_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 232183_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232205_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 232205_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232226_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 232226_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:01.71 +23:19:32.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232230_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 232230_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:14:47.61 +19:10:51.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232243_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 232243_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:22.62 +25:23:46.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232255_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 232255_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232286_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 232286_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232295_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 232295_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232349_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 232349_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232376_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 232376_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:39:23.40 +26:08:52.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232394_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 232394_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:16:12.70 +23:58:06.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232407_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 232407_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:05:05.51 +22:48:05.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232410_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 232410_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:37:05.60 +21:05:26.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232413_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 232413_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:38.63 +23:06:04.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232415_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 232415_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232417_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 232417_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232420_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 232420_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:12.90 +22:43:41.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232441_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 232441_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:21.54 +20:55:43.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232444_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 232444_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232466_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 232466_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:09.62 +22:19:01.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232468_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 232468_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:39:37.56 +24:36:51.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232480_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 232480_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:06:59.37 +19:27:03.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232492_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 232492_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232520_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 232520_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:54.07 +23:37:27.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232528_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 232528_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232546_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
Preparing report for the candidate 232546_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232553_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 232553_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:18.47 +22:44:27.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232555_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 232555_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232580_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 232580_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232584_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 232584_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:19:54.21 +23:17:10.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232617_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 232617_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:08:12.55 +23:50:34.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232621_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 232621_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:13:20.94 +18:34:42.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232625_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 232625_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232651_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
Preparing report for the candidate 232651_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232657_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 232657_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232669_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 232669_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:35:53.32 +22:57:32.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232678_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 232678_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232697_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 232697_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:31:27.79 +17:26:20.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232708_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 232708_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:31:54.36 +22:10:39.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232714_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 232714_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:16:44.92 +21:56:09.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232756_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 232756_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:29:01.29 +21:34:32.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232789_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 232789_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232794_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 232794_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232795_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 232795_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:18.00 +26:30:19.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232797_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 232797_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232810_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 232810_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:40:06.82 +25:19:00.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232910_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 232910_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:27:48.14 +19:27:50.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232961_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 232961_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232969_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 232969_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:16:49.92 +22:09:19.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233046_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 233046_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:22.94 +25:18:55.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233073_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 233073_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:35:04.55 +24:56:45.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194267_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 194267_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:38:07.57 +25:02:11.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80707_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 80707_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:46.28 +20:53:50.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105975_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 105975_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:30:22.96 +22:04:29.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25213_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 25213_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:27:15.36 +18:04:24.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109224_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 109224_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:06.49 +22:13:23.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70118_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 70118_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:25:21.51 +20:19:48.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110234_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 110234_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:56:11.21 +21:51:41.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 43809_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 43809_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:38:58.43 +19:09:05.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25445_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 25445_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:25:39.44 +18:05:06.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32845_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 32845_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:06:43.75 +18:14:46.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153572_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
Preparing report for the candidate 153572_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 220316_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 220316_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:16.62 +24:22:20.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217370_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 217370_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:23.63 +22:54:16.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61063_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 61063_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:30.54 +20:02:08.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29565_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 29565_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:19:43.79 +18:15:20.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35533_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 35533_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:40:49.26 +18:43:25.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89941_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 89941_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:37:26.55 +21:22:28.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59661_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 59661_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:33:58.44 +19:53:42.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70632_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 70632_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:26.10 +20:28:14.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101327_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 101327_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:23:10.82 +21:50:53.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26518_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 26518_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:39.03 +18:11:03.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13793_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 13793_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:18:16.08 +17:21:08.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17658_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 17658_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:25:18.11 +17:38:38.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97583_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
Preparing report for the candidate 97583_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 47494_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 47494_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:21:39.29 +19:11:06.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195093_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 195093_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:40.43 +24:56:05.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121256_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297
The candidate 121256_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_05-09-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0297 did not pass the final checks
