This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_041544_TTUQ1b1x1_1881553_8bTHpNrn
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461264.8851,6.19,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260812.3851 6.19CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 12.3851* 05 21 07.63 +23 38 20.1 9.1 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
N Tau,2461264.8851,9.13,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
N Tau 20260812.3851 9.13CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 12.3851 2461264.8851 9.13 05:58:01.42 +22:18:20.3
187.12820 -0.97997 galactic Ori Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 8.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1 Ceres 1 -0 1 9.0 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:58:01.42 +22:18:20.3: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:58:01.42 +22:18:20.3: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 12.3851* 05 58 01.42 +22 18 20.3 9.1 U Ori 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461264.8851,9.13,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260812.3851 9.13CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 12.3851* 05 21 07.63 +23 38 20.1 9.1 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
N Tau,2461264.8851,9.13,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
N Tau 20260812.3851 9.13CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 12.3851 2461264.8851 11.76 05:42:49.95 +23:48:21.8
184.04885 -3.21427 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 8.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.22 Kalliope 0 0 0 12.3 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:42:49.95 +23:48:21.8: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:42:49.95 +23:48:21.8: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 12.3851* 05 42 49.95 +23 48 21.8 11.8 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461264.8851,11.76,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260812.3851 11.76CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 12.3851 2461264.8851 13.10 05:01:46.19 +22:46:33.4
179.60735 -11.61465 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 8.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.110 Lydia -0 0 1 13.3 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:01:46.19 +22:46:33.4: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:01:46.19 +22:46:33.4: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 12.3851* 05 01 46.19 +22 46 33.4 13.1 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461264.8851,13.10,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260812.3851 13.10CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 12.3851 2461264.8851 13.49 05:46:46.79 +23:32:31.8
184.74565 -2.58010 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 8.6 pix
The object was found in VSX15" Gaia DR3 3427635759091475072
Type: ROT
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
17.810 G 17.850 G 25.448000000000
NOTE: the measured brightness disagrees with the variable-star record above, but is consistent with the asteroid identification below - so this is likely the asteroid rather than an outburst of the variable.
The object was found in astcheck.179 Klytaemnestra 1 -0 1 14.0 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:46:46.79 +23:32:31.8: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:46:46.79 +23:32:31.8: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 12.3851* 05 46 46.79 +23 32 31.8 13.5 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 3427635759091475072,2461264.8851,13.49,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 3427635759091475072 20260812.3851 13.49CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461264.8851,6.70,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260812.3851 6.70CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
First image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Last image: 2461264.88545884 12.08.2026 09:14:53.644 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_041544_TTUQ1b1x1_1881553_8bTHpNrn/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 15
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.65
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 14 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 20279
Objects passed selection criteria: 20184
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 14711.5
Average stars matched: 14502 (98.5759 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 248772 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Aug 6 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-190-gdf2934b0
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Aug 12 04:17:11 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
First image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Last image: 2461264.88545884 12.08.2026 09:14:53.644 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_041544_TTUQ1b1x1_1881553_8bTHpNrn/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 132
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.32
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 50 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 150662
Objects passed selection criteria: 150267
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 110182
Average stars matched: 106667 (96.8098 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 616228 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Aug 6 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-190-gdf2934b0
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Aug 12 04:19:29 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_041544_TTUQ1b1x1_1881553_8bTHpNrn/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-13-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_041544_TTUQ1b1x1_1881553_8bTHpNrn/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_041544_TTUQ1b1x1_1881553_8bTHpNrn/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-13-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_041544_TTUQ1b1x1_1881553_8bTHpNrn/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461264.88482438
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits'
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-13-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-13-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-13-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-13-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits'
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-13-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-13-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
Image size: 944.9'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:17.003 +22:00:41.52 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:17.003 +22:00:41.52
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0157 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
Image size: 944.8'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:20.066 +22:01:11.21 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:20.066 +22:01:11.21
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0205 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:32:17.003 +22:00:41.52
Second-epoch second image center 05:32:20.066 +22:01:11.21
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01442 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xSqzGKAAPO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zienqemoeg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_041544_TTUQ1b1x1_1881553_8bTHpNrn/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-13-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits &> /tmp/tmp.b15qnwXGAk
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_041544_TTUQ1b1x1_1881553_8bTHpNrn/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-13-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_041544_TTUQ1b1x1_1881553_8bTHpNrn/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dPh6VJP2XD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_041544_TTUQ1b1x1_1881553_8bTHpNrn/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 22997 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec +16.4790 to +27.2884 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec 16.4790 to 27.2884 deg
Loaded 12406 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8976 out of 10160 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10160 out of 22997 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.969200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.969200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.65
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.32
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.32
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 22997 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec +16.4790 to +27.2884 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec 16.4790 to 27.2884 deg
Loaded 12406 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8976 out of 10160 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10160 out of 22997 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 20916 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3773 to 91.9061 deg, Dec +16.4876 to +27.3008 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3773 to 91.9061 deg, Dec 16.4876 to 27.3008 deg
Loaded 12329 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8847 out of 10017 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10017 out of 20916 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 15 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
2.0 pix Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
2.7 pix fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-13-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
2.7 pix fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
15.2 mag. Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
13.7 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-13-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
13.7 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.7 (SNR ) 11.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.xSqzGKAAPO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_041544_TTUQ1b1x1_1881553_8bTHpNrn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2479, bad_region=0, passed=22997
Got 22997 stars (including 20487 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 22997 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4778 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4714 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22997 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4778 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22997 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22997 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4713 stars left (next iteration limit 5184)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits N_match=4713 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.465 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.276 n_q1=1531 n_q2=718 n_q3=1554 n_q4=910 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.235
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.zienqemoeg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_041544_TTUQ1b1x1_1881553_8bTHpNrn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2320, bad_region=0, passed=20916
Got 20916 stars (including 18570 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 20916 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4782 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4717 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4783 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4714 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4714 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 4714 stars left (next iteration limit 5187)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits N_match=4714 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.482 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.603 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.446 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.465 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.387 n_q1=1527 n_q2=718 n_q3=1564 n_q4=905 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.251
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.b15qnwXGAk (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_041544_TTUQ1b1x1_1881553_8bTHpNrn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_041544_TTUQ1b1x1_1881553_8bTHpNrn/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-13-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_041544_TTUQ1b1x1_1881553_8bTHpNrn/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-13-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_041544_TTUQ1b1x1_1881553_8bTHpNrn/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-13-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_041544_TTUQ1b1x1_1881553_8bTHpNrn/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-13-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_041544_TTUQ1b1x1_1881553_8bTHpNrn/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-13-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_041544_TTUQ1b1x1_1881553_8bTHpNrn/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-13-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-13-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-13-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-13-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-13-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-13-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-13-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-13-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_041544_TTUQ1b1x1_1881553_8bTHpNrn/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-13-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-13-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=314, bad_region=1, passed=7599
Got 7599 stars (including 7279 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-13-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7599 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013124 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010499 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4791 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4723 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4727 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4723 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7599 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4792 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4727 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7599 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4727 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7599 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 4727 stars left (next iteration limit 5195)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4727 robust_rms=8.022 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.763 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4727 robust_rms=0.605 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.768 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4727 robust_rms=0.430 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.531 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4727 robust_rms_before=1.496 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.454 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.430 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.546 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.531
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.546 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-13-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits N_match=4727 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.452 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.426 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.532 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.392 n_q1=1056 n_q2=1217 n_q3=937 n_q4=1517 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.177
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-13-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-13-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_041544_TTUQ1b1x1_1881553_8bTHpNrn/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-13-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-13-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-13-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.dPh6VJP2XD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_041544_TTUQ1b1x1_1881553_8bTHpNrn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_041544_TTUQ1b1x1_1881553_8bTHpNrn/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_041544_TTUQ1b1x1_1881553_8bTHpNrn/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_041544_TTUQ1b1x1_1881553_8bTHpNrn/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_041544_TTUQ1b1x1_1881553_8bTHpNrn/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_041544_TTUQ1b1x1_1881553_8bTHpNrn/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_041544_TTUQ1b1x1_1881553_8bTHpNrn/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_041544_TTUQ1b1x1_1881553_8bTHpNrn/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=328, bad_region=0, passed=7668
Got 7668 stars (including 7332 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7668 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013122 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010498 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4791 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4728 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4734 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4728 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7668 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4793 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4729 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7668 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4729 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7668 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 4729 stars left (next iteration limit 5200)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4729 robust_rms=8.184 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.441 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4729 robust_rms=0.610 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.771 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4729 robust_rms=0.423 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.526 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4729 robust_rms_before=1.460 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.464 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.423 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.549 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.526
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.549 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits N_match=4729 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.473 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.462 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.532 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.421 n_q1=1061 n_q2=1227 n_q3=933 n_q4=1508 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.125
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_041544_TTUQ1b1x1_1881553_8bTHpNrn/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits sigma_overall=0.377 worst_q_ratio=1.235
ref2=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits sigma_overall=0.482 worst_q_ratio=1.251
new1=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-13-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits sigma_overall=0.452 worst_q_ratio=1.177
new2=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits sigma_overall=0.473 worst_q_ratio=1.125
reference average sigma_overall=0.4295 worst_q_ratio=1.243
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378_astrometric_residuals.png (4713 matched stars from wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_astrometric_residuals.png (4714 matched stars from wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.45 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-13-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246_astrometric_residuals.png (4727 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-13-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.39 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247_astrometric_residuals.png (4729 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.41 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-13-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-13-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_041544_TTUQ1b1x1_1881553_8bTHpNrn/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-13-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_041544_TTUQ1b1x1_1881553_8bTHpNrn/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:58:01.42 +22:18:20.3: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:58:01.42 +22:18:20.3: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out30685.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 11s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 5s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30667_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
Preparing report for the candidate 30667_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30678_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
Preparing report for the candidate 30678_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30685_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
Preparing report for the candidate 30685_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20839_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 20839_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:41.20 +17:53:19.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11829_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 11829_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:00.87 +21:13:33.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07851_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 07851_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:52.74 +23:22:01.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19272_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 19272_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:56.49 +17:54:31.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03444_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 03444_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:48.78 +25:25:23.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14186_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 14186_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:48.96 +20:10:31.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14300_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 14300_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:26.39 +20:22:53.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12302_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 12302_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:38.57 +21:08:30.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17772_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 17772_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:12.77 +18:35:43.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14002_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 14002_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:22.42 +20:16:32.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07308_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 07308_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:07.02 +23:15:44.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14077_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 14077_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:55.12 +20:08:18.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 16s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
05:58:01.42 +22:18:20.3
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_041544_TTUQ1b1x1_1881553_8bTHpNrn/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-13-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_041544_TTUQ1b1x1_1881553_8bTHpNrn/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_041544_TTUQ1b1x1_1881553_8bTHpNrn/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-13-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_041544_TTUQ1b1x1_1881553_8bTHpNrn/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-13-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-13-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-13-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-13-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
Image size: 944.9'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:17.003 +22:00:41.52 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:17.003 +22:00:41.52
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0157 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
Image size: 944.8'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:20.066 +22:01:11.21 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:20.066 +22:01:11.21
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0205 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:32:17.003 +22:00:41.52
Second-epoch second image center 05:32:20.066 +22:01:11.21
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01442 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nyH1Y8zhkD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits &> /tmp/tmp.TyY9Tbjfrt
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_041544_TTUQ1b1x1_1881553_8bTHpNrn/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-13-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jZzr0cE6Bm
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_041544_TTUQ1b1x1_1881553_8bTHpNrn/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-13-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_041544_TTUQ1b1x1_1881553_8bTHpNrn/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9ha3gqZWS8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_041544_TTUQ1b1x1_1881553_8bTHpNrn/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 167968 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec +16.4791 to +27.2941 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec 16.4791 to 27.2941 deg
Loaded 12414 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7145 out of 10502 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10502 out of 167968 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.825500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.825500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.32
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.51
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.51
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 167968 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec +16.4791 to +27.2941 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec 16.4791 to 27.2941 deg
Loaded 12414 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7145 out of 10502 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10502 out of 167968 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 163013 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3370 to 91.9475 deg, Dec +16.4845 to +27.3051 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3370 to 91.9475 deg, Dec 16.4845 to 27.3051 deg
Loaded 12419 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7184 out of 10475 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10475 out of 163013 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 125 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
1.8 pix Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
2.6 pix fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-13-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
2.5 pix fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
15.4 mag. Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-13-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.9 (SNR ) 13.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.nyH1Y8zhkD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_041544_TTUQ1b1x1_1881553_8bTHpNrn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=28, blended=21684, bad_region=13, passed=167940
Got 167940 stars (including 145983 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 167940 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4760 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4716 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 167940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4760 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 167940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 167940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4716 stars left (next iteration limit 5187)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits N_match=4716 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.446 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.278 n_q1=1463 n_q2=774 n_q3=1520 n_q4=959 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.232
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.TyY9Tbjfrt (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_041544_TTUQ1b1x1_1881553_8bTHpNrn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=51, blended=20219, bad_region=0, passed=162962
Got 162962 stars (including 142457 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 162962 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4758 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4712 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4712 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4712 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 162962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4759 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4711 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 162962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4711 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 162962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4711 stars left (next iteration limit 5183)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits N_match=4711 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.470 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.591 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.447 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.378 n_q1=1445 n_q2=753 n_q3=1535 n_q4=978 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.258
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.jZzr0cE6Bm (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_041544_TTUQ1b1x1_1881553_8bTHpNrn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_041544_TTUQ1b1x1_1881553_8bTHpNrn/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-13-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_041544_TTUQ1b1x1_1881553_8bTHpNrn/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-13-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_041544_TTUQ1b1x1_1881553_8bTHpNrn/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-13-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_041544_TTUQ1b1x1_1881553_8bTHpNrn/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-13-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_041544_TTUQ1b1x1_1881553_8bTHpNrn/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-13-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_041544_TTUQ1b1x1_1881553_8bTHpNrn/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-13-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-13-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-13-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-13-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-13-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-13-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-13-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-13-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_041544_TTUQ1b1x1_1881553_8bTHpNrn/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-13-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-13-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=2377, bad_region=11, passed=55677
Got 55677 stars (including 53208 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-13-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 55677 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013124 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010499 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4778 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4718 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55677 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4778 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4718 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55677 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4718 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55677 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 4718 stars left (next iteration limit 5187)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-13-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-13-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits N_match=4718 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.516 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.380 n_q1=1057 n_q2=1184 n_q3=962 n_q4=1515 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.182
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-13-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-13-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_041544_TTUQ1b1x1_1881553_8bTHpNrn/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-13-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-13-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-13-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.9ha3gqZWS8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_041544_TTUQ1b1x1_1881553_8bTHpNrn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_041544_TTUQ1b1x1_1881553_8bTHpNrn/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_041544_TTUQ1b1x1_1881553_8bTHpNrn/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_041544_TTUQ1b1x1_1881553_8bTHpNrn/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_041544_TTUQ1b1x1_1881553_8bTHpNrn/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_041544_TTUQ1b1x1_1881553_8bTHpNrn/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_041544_TTUQ1b1x1_1881553_8bTHpNrn/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_041544_TTUQ1b1x1_1881553_8bTHpNrn/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=2486, bad_region=13, passed=56712
Got 56712 stars (including 54128 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 56712 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013122 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010498 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4780 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4721 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4726 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4721 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56712 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4780 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4722 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56712 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4722 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56712 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 4722 stars left (next iteration limit 5193)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits N_match=4722 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.451 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.445 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.533 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.396 n_q1=1058 n_q2=1200 n_q3=956 n_q4=1508 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.182
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_041544_TTUQ1b1x1_1881553_8bTHpNrn/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-13-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_041544_TTUQ1b1x1_1881553_8bTHpNrn/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-13-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_041544_TTUQ1b1x1_1881553_8bTHpNrn/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:28:02.40 +19:48:09.3: 12.42 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:34:07.76 +24:25:08.5: 12.79 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:45:19.54 +24:08:26.5: 12.93 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:11:57.33 +24:41:59.2: 12.08 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:05:14.45 +20:39:01.1: 13.34 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:42:49.95 +23:48:21.8: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:34:07.76 +24:25:08.5: 12.80 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:45:19.54 +24:08:26.5: 12.90 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:11:57.33 +24:41:59.2: 12.10 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:05:14.45 +20:39:01.1: 13.13 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.09 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.80 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.23 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:11:57.33 +24:41:59.2: ref_mag=12.09 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2538 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:05:14.45 +20:39:01.1: ref_mag=13.23 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1733 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.92 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:34:07.76 +24:25:08.5: ref_mag=12.80 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.9887 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:45:19.54 +24:08:26.5: ref_mag=12.92 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.0571 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:28:02.40 +19:48:09.3: 12.47 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.44 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:28:02.40 +19:48:09.3: ref_mag=12.44 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2301 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:42:49.95 +23:48:21.8: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 06:07:15.54 +25:16:09.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:31:40.08 +18:13:15.3: 12.73 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:07:15.54 +25:16:09.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:07:15.54 +25:16:09.8: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:01:46.19 +22:46:33.4: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:31:40.08 +18:13:15.3: 12.75 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.74 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:31:40.08 +18:13:15.3: ref_mag=12.74 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4795 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:01:46.19 +22:46:33.4: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:35:02.30 +24:18:46.5: 13.24 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:35:02.30 +24:18:46.5: 13.25 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.24 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:35:02.30 +24:18:46.5: ref_mag=13.24 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8760 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:30:21.65 +25:20:29.4: 13.43 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:30:21.65 +25:20:29.4: 13.51 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:30:21.65 +25:20:29.4: ref_mag=13.46 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2274 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:35:56.74 +25:28:05.3: 13.37 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:10:45.85 +21:33:01.5: 14.01 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:46:46.79 +23:32:31.8: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:35:56.74 +25:28:05.3: 13.41 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.39 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:35:56.74 +25:28:05.3: ref_mag=13.39 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4037 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:10:45.85 +21:33:01.5: 13.96 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.98 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:10:45.85 +21:33:01.5: ref_mag=13.98 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6208 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:46:46.79 +23:32:31.8: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:42:54.47 +21:13:23.5: 13.15 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:42:54.47 +21:13:23.5: 13.07 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.11 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:42:54.47 +21:13:23.5: ref_mag=13.11 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3892 delta=0.72 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out190813.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out191064.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out191644.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 13s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 5s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190570_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 190570_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:21.96 +23:00:58.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190572_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 190572_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:26.53 +25:17:08.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190577_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 190577_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190580_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 190580_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:17.25 +18:20:16.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190582_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 190582_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:06.21 +17:57:53.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190583_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 190583_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190586_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 190586_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190587_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 190587_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:12.85 +24:49:47.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190589_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 190589_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190592_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 190592_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190601_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
Preparing report for the candidate 190601_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190612_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 190612_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:01.42 +22:18:20.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190654_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 190654_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:58.93 +26:19:49.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190813_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
Preparing report for the candidate 190813_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190834_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 190834_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:56.12 +22:38:55.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190853_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 190853_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:49.71 +26:44:16.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190883_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 190883_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:06.86 +23:48:50.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190897_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 190897_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:45.95 +26:25:46.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190911_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 190911_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:01.85 +25:55:15.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190921_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 190921_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:50.73 +22:27:24.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190935_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 190935_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:41.73 +23:02:26.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190940_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 190940_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:02.90 +23:18:02.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190959_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 190959_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190985_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 190985_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:01.77 +26:45:56.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190994_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 190994_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:11.72 +19:34:17.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191021_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191021_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:11:14.99 +23:03:09.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191041_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191041_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:03:20.82 +23:48:37.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191043_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191043_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:09.96 +18:33:14.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191046_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191046_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:11:19.49 +24:25:49.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191052_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191052_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:43.97 +26:10:36.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191062_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191062_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191064_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
Preparing report for the candidate 191064_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191096_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191096_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:37.04 +25:05:43.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191126_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191126_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:16:23.12 +25:24:07.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191128_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191128_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:08:24.84 +22:03:41.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191132_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191132_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:04:52.88 +23:55:44.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191139_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191139_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:43:00.28 +18:59:08.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191169_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191169_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:08:20.38 +22:03:08.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191170_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191170_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:10.90 +20:10:04.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191172_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191172_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:59:37.59 +21:37:17.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191198_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191198_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:32.27 +22:45:15.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191199_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191199_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191202_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191202_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:08:24.16 +23:12:21.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191212_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191212_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:40.07 +20:26:11.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191234_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191234_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:48.62 +25:09:12.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191239_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191239_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:10.77 +25:24:58.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191241_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191241_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:57:55.95 +24:36:41.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191247_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191247_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:02:23.07 +26:25:57.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191264_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191264_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:38.34 +18:33:25.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191280_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191280_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:08.57 +20:02:25.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191293_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191293_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:14.97 +19:35:43.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191304_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191304_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:11.73 +22:40:40.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191310_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191310_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191352_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191352_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:29.58 +21:46:13.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191358_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191358_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:02.97 +18:33:59.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191375_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191375_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:20.37 +25:08:59.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191386_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191386_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:42.21 +23:00:06.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191396_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191396_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:10.58 +20:05:07.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191427_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191427_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:37.63 +22:22:58.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191458_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191458_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:07.74 +19:32:31.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191474_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191474_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:02.43 +24:22:18.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191497_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191497_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:40.01 +22:58:29.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191505_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191505_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:30.85 +18:25:30.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191520_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191520_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:25.24 +23:07:38.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191539_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191539_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:02:21.46 +26:25:44.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191545_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191545_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191546_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191546_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:05.43 +22:29:50.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191598_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191598_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:04.54 +20:26:41.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191641_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 191641_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191644_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
Preparing report for the candidate 191644_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58326_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 58326_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:07.01 +23:15:44.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58778_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 58778_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:52.72 +23:22:01.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109495_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 109495_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:26.39 +20:22:52.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110068_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 110068_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:01.37 +20:16:25.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145353_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 145353_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:21:12.49 +19:30:27.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87989_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 87989_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:53.51 +21:35:20.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82933_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 82933_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:50.59 +21:45:09.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98078_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 98078_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:16.11 +20:53:50.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32345_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 32345_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:18.08 +24:59:40.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14597_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 14597_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:00.40 +26:13:09.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59493_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 59493_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:36.81 +23:10:49.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93856_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 93856_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 45018_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 45018_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:29.14 +24:10:01.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158119_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 158119_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:50:04.16 +17:07:18.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49613_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
Preparing report for the candidate 49613_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19093_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 19093_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:43.25 +25:40:39.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110271_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 110271_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:37.35 +20:19:19.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81365_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 81365_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:40.99 +21:49:48.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142657_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 142657_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:37.74 +19:21:17.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90391_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 90391_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:40:56.46 +21:25:37.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114972_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 114972_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:16:28.92 +20:02:20.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 123315_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 123315_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:20.20 +17:59:46.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65420_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 65420_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:30.72 +22:47:28.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69780_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 69780_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:05:27.64 +22:20:42.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108934_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 108934_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:18.15 +20:22:04.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120168_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 120168_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:56.45 +17:54:32.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27363_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 27363_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:50:00.54 +25:17:11.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128442_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 128442_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:37.87 +18:24:14.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65120_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 65120_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:25.80 +22:48:15.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118951_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 118951_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:41.20 +17:53:19.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80276_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 80276_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:56:11.09 +21:51:40.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25835_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 25835_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:48.81 +25:25:24.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49183_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 49183_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:41.38 +23:51:42.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91223_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 91223_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:00.82 +21:13:33.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106761_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 106761_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:15.58 +20:28:55.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79132_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 79132_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:35.89 +21:55:37.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111854_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 111854_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:48.94 +20:10:31.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96330_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 96330_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:38.57 +21:08:30.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66296_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 66296_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:57:07.25 +22:50:19.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105095_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 105095_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:39.33 +20:41:41.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117978_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 117978_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:12.76 +18:35:43.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129379_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 129379_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:31.60 +18:32:27.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120138_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 120138_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:10.17 +17:57:47.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39648_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 39648_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:00.77 +24:33:59.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116845_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 116845_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:23.29 +19:52:04.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157917_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 157917_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:01.70 +17:14:22.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160317_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 160317_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:26.06 +17:23:03.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 155021_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 155021_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:14.32 +17:03:27.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 155271_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 155271_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:03.74 +17:02:25.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110647_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 110647_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:22.42 +20:16:32.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150783_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 150783_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:56.59 +19:44:59.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14039_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 14039_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:57:59.51 +25:57:13.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110624_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 110624_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:55.12 +20:08:18.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166587_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 166587_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:26.03 +17:43:46.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117642_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247
The candidate 117642_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_04-14-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks
