FITS images used in this processing run:

Field Cam-05-Q1b1x1 reference image: Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
Field Cam-05-Q1b1x1 reference image: Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
Field Cam-05-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
Field Cam-05-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits

## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461082.79122913 11.02.2026 06:59:12.197   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
First image: 2461082.79122913 11.02.2026 06:59:12.197   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
Last  image: 2461264.84997765 12.08.2026 08:23:48.069   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 0
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.58
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  10.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     55000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.37            # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  8231
Objects passed selection criteria:  8224
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.2    4.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.2    4.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 7267.25
Average stars matched: 6742.25 (92.7758 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   234768 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Thu Aug  6 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-190-gdf2934b0
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Wed Aug 12 03:25:44 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461082.79122913 11.02.2026 06:59:12.197   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
First image: 2461082.79122913 11.02.2026 06:59:12.197   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
Last  image: 2461264.84997765 12.08.2026 08:23:48.069   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 80
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.31
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 16 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  2.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     57000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.83            # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  45595
Objects passed selection criteria:  45522
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.4    4.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.4    4.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 42662.8
Average stars matched: 40388.5 (94.6692 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   268880 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Thu Aug  6 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-190-gdf2934b0
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Wed Aug 12 03:26:44 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Cam-05-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Cam-05-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Cam-05-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 410622 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 410622 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 

Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:

MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes


renamed 'Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.png' -> 'transient_report/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits_preview.png'

Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits


renamed 'Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.png' -> 'transient_report/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits_preview.png'

Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits




Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 575.4353
INFO:         REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 517.8945
INFO:    SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1165.4279
INFO:            SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 429.6213
INFO:   SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1165.1025
INFO:           SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 428.4967
----------------------------------------------
INFO:      ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.0253
INFO:                  SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.003
INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     28.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 26.8 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits 
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-12T03:22:49.6807515' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-12T08:22:49.6807515' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61264.3491861112 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-12T08:22:59.5821628' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61264.3493007175 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     179.999911493464 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =     77.5000514880086 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     21.5202777777778 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     356.350277777778 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     2.70894192608343 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =     33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=    -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'Cam-05'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '12 00 00'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+77 30 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                29518 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                29518 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     28.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     28.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                 15.5 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 50.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=               899.59 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 26.8 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                 29.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=            16.601328 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =            14.401152 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/d_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits :)

Spent 0.715947 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/d_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 26658.571233
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=17308.5, right_median=19900.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     28.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 26.8 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits 
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-12T03:23:48.0691695' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-12T08:23:48.0691695' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61264.3498619096 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-12T08:23:57.9725183' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =      61264.349976528 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     179.999911581117 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =     77.5000515435042 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =              21.5075 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     356.405833333333 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     2.71045192556092 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =     33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=    -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'Cam-05'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '12 00 00'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+77 30 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                29518 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                29518 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     28.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     28.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                 15.5 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 50.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=               899.59 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 26.8 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                 29.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=            16.601328 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =            14.401152 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/d_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits :)

Spent 0.736770 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/d_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 26658.571233
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=17308.5, right_median=19900.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:


fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits



fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits




Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1

  ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461264.84930185
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits'
wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits'
wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits'
wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
Image size: 941.9'x627.2'  15.7(deg)x10.5(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:59:58.925 +77:29:59.77 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
Image size: 941.3'x627.5'  15.7(deg)x10.5(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:59:43.170 +77:25:20.77 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:59:58.925 +77:29:59.77
Second-epoch image center 11:59:43.170 +77:25:20.77
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0788 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
Image size: 941.3'x627.5'  15.7(deg)x10.5(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:59:41.205 +77:25:51.43 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:59:58.925 +77:29:59.77
Second-epoch image center 11:59:41.205 +77:25:51.43
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0708 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  11:59:43.170 +77:25:20.77
Second-epoch second image center 11:59:41.205 +77:25:51.43
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00870 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits &> /tmp/tmp.VKJ0J4GFWM
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Oenfp3xP4r
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits &> /tmp/tmp.T5BiB4eHH7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JmAkyhmo5L
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits and wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits and wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat 
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits and wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 8935 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 137.2520 to 228.8003 deg, Dec +69.4278 to +83.2203 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 137.2520 to 228.8003 deg, Dec 69.4278 to 83.2203 deg
Loaded 11837 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5410 out of 5718 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5718 out of 8935 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.862250
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.862250
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.58
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.28

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.28

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 8935 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 137.2520 to 228.8003 deg, Dec +69.4278 to +83.2203 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 137.2520 to 228.8003 deg, Dec 69.4278 to 83.2203 deg
Loaded 11837 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5410 out of 5718 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5718 out of 8935 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 9444 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 132.7167 to 226.3162 deg, Dec +70.5552 to +82.7628 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 132.7167 to 226.3162 deg, Dec 70.5552 to 82.7628 deg
Loaded 10553 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3703 out of 3846 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3846 out of 9444 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits (aperture=6.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.1 pix  Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
 2.3 pix  Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
 2.1 pix  fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
 2.0 pix  fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.3 mag.  Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
 15.2 mag.  Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
 14.6 mag.  fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
 14.6 mag.  fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  14.6 (SNR )  11.6 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.VKJ0J4GFWM (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=680, bad_region=0, passed=8935
Got 8935 stars (including 8237 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8935 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 797 to 868 (Dec 69.4 to 83.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4901 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8935 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 797 to 868 (Dec 69.4 to 83.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8935 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8935 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 
Excluding outliers - 4901 stars left (next iteration limit 5391)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits N_match=4901 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.462 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.305 n_q1=1059 n_q2=1199 n_q3=1313 n_q4=1330 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.299
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits -region wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Oenfp3xP4r (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=593, bad_region=0, passed=9444
Got 9444 stars (including 8840 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9444 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.6 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4895 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9444 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.6 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4897 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9444 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9444 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Excluding outliers - 4896 stars left (next iteration limit 5384)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits N_match=4896 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.318 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.311 n_q1=1140 n_q2=1167 n_q3=1319 n_q4=1270 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.150
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits -region wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.T5BiB4eHH7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=300, bad_region=1, passed=5472
Got 5472 stars (including 5162 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5472 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.4 to 82.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4891 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4889 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5472 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.4 to 82.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4891 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5472 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5472 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Excluding outliers - 4889 stars left (next iteration limit 5377)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4889 robust_rms=12.191 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.644 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4889 robust_rms=0.483 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.507 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4889 robust_rms=0.360 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.388 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4889 robust_rms_before=0.850 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.363 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.360 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.387 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.388
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.387 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits N_match=4889 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.402 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.383 n_q1=1312 n_q2=1377 n_q3=1140 n_q4=1060 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.083
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.JmAkyhmo5L (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=278, bad_region=0, passed=5426
Got 5426 stars (including 5137 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5426 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.4 to 82.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4894 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4892 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5426 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.4 to 82.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4895 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5426 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5426 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Excluding outliers - 4892 stars left (next iteration limit 5381)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4892 robust_rms=12.099 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.359 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4892 robust_rms=0.489 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.519 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4892 robust_rms=0.371 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.403 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4892 robust_rms_before=0.849 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.370 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.371 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.397 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.403
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.397 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits N_match=4892 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.394 n_q1=1305 n_q2=1377 n_q3=1143 n_q4=1067 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.043
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits sigma_overall=0.355 worst_q_ratio=1.299
ref2=Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits sigma_overall=0.320 worst_q_ratio=1.150
new1=fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits sigma_overall=0.372 worst_q_ratio=1.083
new2=fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits sigma_overall=0.378 worst_q_ratio=1.043
reference average sigma_overall=0.3375 worst_q_ratio=1.2245
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################

Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284_astrometric_residuals.png (4901 matched stars from wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280_astrometric_residuals.png (4896 matched stars from wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200_astrometric_residuals.png (4889 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201_astrometric_residuals.png (4892 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)


Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL

  ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
Image size: 941.9'x627.2'  15.7(deg)x10.5(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:59:58.925 +77:29:59.77 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
Image size: 941.3'x627.5'  15.7(deg)x10.5(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:59:43.170 +77:25:20.77 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:59:58.925 +77:29:59.77
Second-epoch image center 11:59:43.170 +77:25:20.77
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0788 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
Image size: 941.3'x627.5'  15.7(deg)x10.5(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:59:41.205 +77:25:51.43 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:59:58.925 +77:29:59.77
Second-epoch image center 11:59:41.205 +77:25:51.43
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0708 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  11:59:43.170 +77:25:20.77
Second-epoch second image center 11:59:41.205 +77:25:51.43
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00870 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Ek9VxWrjDi
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits &> /tmp/tmp.mRmTbtGj64
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Avftqg51Rs
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lBClbGj0sa
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits and wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits and wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat 
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits and wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 51561 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 136.5617 to 229.0190 deg, Dec +69.4278 to +83.2318 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 136.5617 to 229.0190 deg, Dec 69.4278 to 83.2318 deg
Loaded 12006 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5102 out of 5807 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5807 out of 51561 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.749000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.749000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.31
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.44

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.44

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 51561 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 136.5617 to 229.0190 deg, Dec +69.4278 to +83.2318 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 136.5617 to 229.0190 deg, Dec 69.4278 to 83.2318 deg
Loaded 12006 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5102 out of 5807 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5807 out of 51561 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits (aperture=4.8)
Read 48477 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 132.3942 to 226.7803 deg, Dec +70.4537 to +82.7794 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 132.3942 to 226.7803 deg, Dec 70.4537 to 82.7794 deg
Loaded 10790 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3498 out of 3909 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3909 out of 48477 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits (aperture=5.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 72 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 1.9 pix  Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
 2.2 pix  Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
 1.9 pix  fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
 1.9 pix  fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.4 mag.  Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
 15.4 mag.  Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
 14.8 mag.  fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
 14.8 mag.  fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  14.8 (SNR )  14.3 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.Ek9VxWrjDi (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=24, blended=2563, bad_region=1, passed=51537
Got 51537 stars (including 48894 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 51537 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 797 to 868 (Dec 69.4 to 83.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4896 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51537 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 797 to 868 (Dec 69.4 to 83.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51537 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51537 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Excluding outliers - 4896 stars left (next iteration limit 5385)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits N_match=4896 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.296 n_q1=1055 n_q2=1197 n_q3=1288 n_q4=1356 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.284
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits -region wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.mRmTbtGj64 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=2481, bad_region=0, passed=48460
Got 48460 stars (including 45910 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 48460 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.5 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4892 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4888 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48460 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.5 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4891 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48460 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48460 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Excluding outliers - 4890 stars left (next iteration limit 5376)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits N_match=4890 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.294 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.320 n_q1=1139 n_q2=1198 n_q3=1281 n_q4=1272 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.116
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits -region wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Avftqg51Rs (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=1078, bad_region=24, passed=35873
Got 35873 stars (including 34703 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 35873 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 801 to 865 (Dec 70.3 to 82.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4895 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4894 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35873 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 801 to 865 (Dec 70.3 to 82.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4896 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35873 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35873 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 
Excluding outliers - 4894 stars left (next iteration limit 5383)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits N_match=4894 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.361 n_q1=1335 n_q2=1406 n_q3=1112 n_q4=1041 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.146
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.lBClbGj0sa (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=1085, bad_region=24, passed=36008
Got 36008 stars (including 34825 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 36008 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 801 to 865 (Dec 70.3 to 82.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4894 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4893 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36008 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 801 to 865 (Dec 70.3 to 82.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4895 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36008 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36008 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Excluding outliers - 4893 stars left (next iteration limit 5382)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits N_match=4893 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.385 n_q1=1330 n_q2=1405 n_q3=1108 n_q4=1050 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.047
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 11:01:21.01 +82:09:10.0:  99.00 +/- 99.00  edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 12:25:20.97 +75:42:05.7:  13.96 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 13:07:25.86 +77:52:22.1:  13.24 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 11:53:26.08 +78:51:32.8:  14.73 +/- 0.10  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 11:01:30.42 +78:51:01.7:  13.68 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 14:17:04.34 +79:43:02.6:  14.87 +/- 0.15  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 13:11:27.27 +78:27:05.5:  13.41 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 11:01:30.42 +78:51:01.7:  13.51 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 13:07:25.86 +77:52:22.1:  13.42 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 11:01:21.01 +82:09:10.0:  14.82 +/- 0.14  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 12:25:20.97 +75:42:05.7:  13.90 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 11:53:26.08 +78:51:32.8:  14.59 +/- 0.09  detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:01:21.01 +82:09:10.0: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.32 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.58 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:07:25.86 +77:52:22.1: ref_mag=13.32 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5615 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:01:30.42 +78:51:01.7: ref_mag=13.58 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9357 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.65 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.93 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:53:26.08 +78:51:32.8: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.6676 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:25:20.97 +75:42:05.7: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1046 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 14:17:04.34 +79:43:02.6:  14.35 +/- 0.09  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.49 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:17:04.34 +79:43:02.6: ref_mag=14.49 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.4783 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 11:45:27.63 +81:51:49.5:  12.88 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 13:11:27.27 +78:27:05.5:  13.01 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.14 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:11:27.27 +78:27:05.5: ref_mag=13.14 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3975 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 11:45:27.63 +81:51:49.5:  12.82 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.85 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:45:27.63 +81:51:49.5: ref_mag=12.85 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.0246 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 12:11:27.47 +81:25:46.9:  12.53 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 11:00:26.71 +77:42:09.4:  12.88 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 13:10:14.93 +80:00:32.9:  12.80 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 11:00:26.71 +77:42:09.4:  12.80 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.84 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:00:26.71 +77:42:09.4: ref_mag=12.84 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8158 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 12:11:27.47 +81:25:46.9:  12.80 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.63 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:11:27.47 +81:25:46.9: ref_mag=12.63 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.9080 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 13:10:14.93 +80:00:32.9:  12.75 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.77 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:10:14.93 +80:00:32.9: ref_mag=12.77 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.9018 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 12:33:29.42 +75:11:24.7:  13.39 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 12:25:09.90 +77:43:45.2:  13.39 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 12:33:29.42 +75:11:24.7:  13.33 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.36 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:33:29.42 +75:11:24.7: ref_mag=13.36 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2306 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 12:25:09.90 +77:43:45.2:  13.34 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.36 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:25:09.90 +77:43:45.2: ref_mag=13.36 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5314 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 11:10:33.51 +80:57:27.2:  13.97 +/- 0.06  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 12:34:27.13 +75:39:12.4:  14.04 +/- 0.06  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 12:36:28.17 +79:13:33.0:  14.10 +/- 0.09  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 11:15:30.07 +75:07:34.9:  14.04 +/- 0.08  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 11:10:33.51 +80:57:27.2:  13.91 +/- 0.07  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.94 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:10:33.51 +80:57:27.2: ref_mag=13.94 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9089 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 12:34:27.13 +75:39:12.4:  13.94 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.99 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:34:27.13 +75:39:12.4: ref_mag=13.99 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8653 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 12:36:28.17 +79:13:33.0:  13.97 +/- 0.08  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.03 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:36:28.17 +79:13:33.0: ref_mag=14.03 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.0617 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 11:15:30.07 +75:07:34.9:  13.94 +/- 0.08  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.99 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:15:30.07 +75:07:34.9: ref_mag=13.99 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.9844 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 10:48:44.11 +80:35:40.6:  14.76 +/- 0.11  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 10:48:44.11 +80:35:40.6:  15.28 +/- 0.20  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.89 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:48:44.11 +80:35:40.6: ref_mag=14.89 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.7032 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 4s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69542_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 69542_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 12.34930    2461264.84930    14.71    11:53:26.36 +78:51:32.7   5026 2342   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 12.34998    2461264.84998    14.64    11:53:25.81 +78:51:32.9   5025 2347   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69546_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 69546_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 12.34930    2461264.84930    14.65    14:17:04.36 +79:43:03.0   1446 0531   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 12.34998    2461264.84998    14.39    14:17:04.32 +79:43:02.2   1445 0536   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69548_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 69548_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 12.34930    2461264.84930    14.58    11:01:21.20 +82:09:11.0   6169 0271   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 12.34998    2461264.84998    14.61    11:01:20.82 +82:09:09.1   6168 0277   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69559_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 69559_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 12.34998    2461264.84998    14.32    11:00:39.16 +78:00:23.3   6650 2734   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits

**** FOUND  11:00:39.16 +78:00:23.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69560_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 69560_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 12.34930    2461264.84930    14.11    12:25:21.22 +75:42:05.9   3777 4116   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 12.34998    2461264.84998    14.10    12:25:20.72 +75:42:05.4   3776 4121   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69565_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 69565_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 12.34930    2461264.84930    13.92    11:01:30.53 +78:51:01.7   6532 2234   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 12.34998    2461264.84998    13.95    11:01:30.32 +78:51:01.7   6531 2239   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69567_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 69567_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 12.34998    2461264.84998    13.85    12:51:41.15 +78:46:30.3   3342 2125   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69573_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 69573_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 12.34998    2461264.84998    13.62    12:20:11.11 +75:22:09.1   3935 4349   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits

**** FOUND  12:20:11.11 +75:22:09.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69574_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 69574_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 12.34998    2461264.84998    13.81    12:04:49.51 +81:25:18.7   4826 0787   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits

**** FOUND  12:04:49.32 +81:25:18.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69576_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 69576_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 12.34930    2461264.84930    13.57    13:07:25.76 +77:52:21.2   2716 2486   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 12.34998    2461264.84998    13.56    13:07:25.96 +77:52:23.0   2715 2490   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69578_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 69578_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 12.34930    2461264.84930    13.39    13:11:27.26 +78:27:06.1   2722 2115   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 12.34998    2461264.84998    13.40    13:11:27.28 +78:27:04.9   2721 2120   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69581_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 69581_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 12.34930    2461264.84930    13.01    11:45:27.45 +81:51:49.3   5263 0533   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 12.34998    2461264.84998    13.04    11:45:27.82 +81:51:49.7   5262 0539   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69582_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 69582_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 12.34998    2461264.84998    12.80    10:45:10.31 +78:29:20.4   7052 2345   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits

**** FOUND  10:45:10.24 +78:29:20.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69631_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 69631_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 12.34998    2461264.84998    10.90    12:40:33.11 +74:43:37.6   3083 4578   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69663_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 69663_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 12.34998    2461264.84998    11.99    13:59:10.36 +77:20:36.6   1063 2025   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69728_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 69728_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 12.34998    2461264.84998    12.74    13:11:43.41 +80:27:49.6   3153 0985   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits

**** FOUND  13:11:43.51 +80:27:49.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69753_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 69753_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 12.34930    2461264.84930    12.91    13:10:14.99 +80:00:33.2   3091 1250   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 12.34998    2461264.84998    12.90    13:10:14.87 +80:00:32.7   3090 1255   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69755_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 69755_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 12.34930    2461264.84930    12.93    12:11:27.42 +81:25:47.1   4679 0763   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 12.34998    2461264.84998    12.89    12:11:27.52 +81:25:46.6   4678 0768   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69756_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 69756_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 12.34930    2461264.84930    12.82    11:00:26.57 +77:42:09.2   6692 2907   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 12.34998    2461264.84998    12.81    11:00:26.86 +77:42:09.6   6691 2912   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69760_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 69760_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 12.34998    2461264.84998    12.75    13:41:16.60 +72:47:05.6   0250 4763   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69771_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 69771_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 12.34998    2461264.84998    13.00    13:43:08.47 +77:45:31.6   1646 2079   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69776_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 69776_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 12.34998    2461264.84998    13.01    13:54:39.95 +76:33:48.7   0941 2507   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69797_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 69797_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 12.34998    2461264.84998    13.16    13:49:59.56 +79:36:46.5   2026 1004   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69798_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 69798_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 12.34998    2461264.84998    13.27    12:59:01.49 +77:13:25.5   2845 2949   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69823_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 69823_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 12.34998    2461264.84998    13.22    14:22:30.71 +78:33:03.5   0884 0997   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69826_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 69826_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 12.34998    2461264.84998    13.21    13:42:34.07 +73:15:55.2   0341 4478   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69827_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 69827_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 12.34998    2461264.84998    13.42    13:58:48.41 +79:19:07.3   1723 1026   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69830_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 69830_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 12.34998    2461264.84998    13.46    14:36:26.22 +79:42:05.0   1029 0203   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69834_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 69834_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 12.34930    2461264.84930    13.28    12:33:29.35 +75:11:24.7   3416 4361   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 12.34998    2461264.84998    13.19    12:33:29.49 +75:11:24.8   3415 4366   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69838_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 69838_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 12.34998    2461264.84998    13.49    14:00:02.41 +74:48:33.1   0193 3299   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69845_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 69845_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 12.34998    2461264.84998    13.50    13:54:27.44 +77:03:22.1   1105 2257   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69852_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 69852_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 12.34998    2461264.84998    13.39    13:48:49.68 +75:18:23.0   0732 3271   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69855_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 69855_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 12.34998    2461264.84998    13.42    13:50:50.19 +74:18:05.7   0349 3757   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69858_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 69858_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 12.34998    2461264.84998    13.56    14:19:35.28 +77:54:05.8   0711 1363   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69859_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 69859_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 12.34998    2461264.84998    13.50    10:59:45.69 +79:39:33.7   6488 1751   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits

**** FOUND  10:59:45.71 +79:39:33.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69869_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 69869_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 12.34998    2461264.84998    13.42    13:13:54.11 +80:52:07.3   3193 0737   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69879_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 69879_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 12.34930    2461264.84930    13.56    12:25:09.98 +77:43:45.1   3993 2916   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 12.34998    2461264.84998    13.51    12:25:09.82 +77:43:45.4   3992 2921   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69881_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 69881_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 12.34998    2461264.84998    13.44    10:57:15.51 +74:22:19.4   7198 4859   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits

**** FOUND  10:57:15.35 +74:22:20.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69882_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 69882_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 12.34998    2461264.84998    13.27    13:39:09.80 +76:29:47.3   1400 2814   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69890_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 69890_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 12.34998    2461264.84998    13.52    10:40:36.76 +74:52:58.7   7776 4404   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits

**** FOUND  10:40:36.57 +74:52:59.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69895_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 69895_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 12.34998    2461264.84998    13.40    10:23:47.97 +78:20:01.3   7702 2242   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits

**** FOUND  10:23:48.03 +78:20:01.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69912_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 69912_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 12.34998    2461264.84998    13.81    14:16:31.38 +78:08:20.7   0877 1308   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69915_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 69915_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 12.34998    2461264.84998    13.63    13:57:29.93 +76:16:41.3   0762 2600   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69917_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 69917_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 12.34998    2461264.84998    13.92    14:08:20.40 +80:30:14.2   1913 0287   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69941_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 69941_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 12.34998    2461264.84998    13.59    12:49:00.14 +79:11:59.3   3487 1900   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits

**** FOUND  12:48:59.99 +79:11:59.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69945_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 69945_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 12.34998    2461264.84998    13.73    12:47:40.94 +80:29:55.4   3730 1155   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69952_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 69952_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 12.34930    2461264.84930    13.90    11:10:33.99 +80:57:26.8   6086 1020   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 12.34998    2461264.84998    13.92    11:10:33.04 +80:57:27.7   6086 1025   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69953_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 69953_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 12.34998    2461264.84998    13.62    11:39:17.93 +75:02:02.8   5490 4649   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits

**** FOUND  11:39:17.95 +75:02:02.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69963_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 69963_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 12.34998    2461264.84998    13.75    10:43:14.26 +77:23:46.7   7280 2966   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits

**** FOUND  10:43:14.21 +77:23:46.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69967_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 69967_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 12.34930    2461264.84930    13.85    12:34:27.31 +75:39:12.7   3439 4081   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 12.34998    2461264.84998    13.88    12:34:26.96 +75:39:12.0   3437 4086   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69985_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 69985_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 12.34998    2461264.84998    13.86    10:55:47.45 +77:05:45.2   6914 3240   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits

**** FOUND  10:55:47.21 +77:05:45.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69986_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 69986_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 12.34998    2461264.84998    14.03    13:56:17.44 +77:09:55.5   1087 2168   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69991_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 69991_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 12.34998    2461264.84998    13.78    13:06:49.78 +73:07:07.3   1744 5196   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69995_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 69995_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 12.34930    2461264.84930    14.00    12:36:28.39 +79:13:31.4   3835 1967   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 12.34998    2461264.84998    14.16    12:36:27.95 +79:13:34.7   3834 1972   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69999_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 69999_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 12.34998    2461264.84998    13.89    12:20:07.96 +79:11:40.7   4283 2075   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits

**** FOUND  12:20:07.96 +79:11:40.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70014_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 70014_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 12.34998    2461264.84998    13.77    12:34:34.95 +76:02:08.3   3481 3859   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits

**** FOUND  12:34:34.92 +76:02:08.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70030_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 70030_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 12.34930    2461264.84930    13.97    11:15:29.98 +75:07:34.6   6409 4521   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 12.34998    2461264.84998    14.00    11:15:30.15 +75:07:35.2   6407 4526   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70051_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 70051_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 12.34998    2461264.84998    14.32    12:11:53.53 +81:41:44.0   4687 0607   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits

**** FOUND  12:11:53.59 +81:41:44.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70068_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 70068_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 12.34998    2461264.84998    14.28    13:03:36.78 +81:54:02.6   3630 0234   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70080_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 70080_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 12.34998    2461264.84998    14.33    11:32:36.46 +79:28:12.9   5611 1975   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits

**** FOUND  11:32:36.75 +79:28:13.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70115_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 70115_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 12.34998    2461264.84998    14.26    11:15:45.39 +78:15:58.5   6163 2652   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits

**** FOUND  11:15:45.55 +78:15:58.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70122_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 70122_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 12.34998    2461264.84998    14.31    13:26:25.79 +75:12:00.0   1475 3725   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70167_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 70167_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 12.34998    2461264.84998    14.06    12:04:49.64 +75:20:20.4   4514 4436   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits

**** FOUND  12:04:49.67 +75:20:19.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70182_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 70182_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 12.34998    2461264.84998    14.49    13:06:00.35 +74:39:47.7   2098 4327   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70203_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 70203_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 12.34998    2461264.84998    14.33    12:46:38.96 +81:42:38.6   3945 0454   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits

**** FOUND  12:46:38.98 +81:42:37.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70208_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 70208_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 12.34998    2461264.84998    14.52    12:27:45.72 +77:22:46.7   3872 3113   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70214_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 70214_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 12.34998    2461264.84998    14.67    13:33:01.52 +79:01:54.9   2278 1542   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70224_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 70224_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 12.34998    2461264.84998    14.70    14:03:13.47 +79:00:47.4   1515 1111   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70225_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 70225_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 12.34998    2461264.84998    14.25    13:21:44.80 +76:44:58.7   2019 2941   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70227_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 70227_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 12.34930    2461264.84930    14.69    10:48:44.77 +80:35:40.5   6647 1132   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-22-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 12.34998    2461264.84998    14.71    10:48:43.45 +80:35:40.8   6647 1137   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70239_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 70239_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 12.34998    2461264.84998    14.60    12:59:16.15 +81:05:08.7   3564 0734   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70299_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 70299_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 12.34998    2461264.84998    14.49    11:56:17.55 +76:24:41.2   4870 3813   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_032429_TTUQ1b1x1_3823471_G09bTjVd/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_03-23-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.8") between the two second-epoch detections
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 5s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
########### Completed Cam-05-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
###################################################################################
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO  ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461264.84930185 -observatory V36
08:26:04.14 +19:45:21.9 Mercury (-1.0mag)
12:17:08.17 -03:03:00.3 Venus (-4.4mag)
06:01:14.77 +23:41:01.5 Mars (1.3mag)
08:46:38.91 +18:27:23.8 Jupiter (-1.8mag)
00:56:04.54 +03:12:04.1 Saturn (0.6mag)
04:12:10.89 +20:58:07.2 Uranus (5.7mag)
00:15:50.94 +00:11:19.9 Neptune (7.7mag)
20:27:44.98 -23:31:44.4 Pluto (14.5mag)
09:09:23.48 +17:11:58.3 Moon (99.9mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Aug 12 03:25 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461264.84930185:
08:46:34.27 +18:27:45.4 Io (6.1mag)
08:46:49.64 +18:26:37.0 Europa (6.3mag)
08:46:25.41 +18:28:25.7 Ganymede (5.6mag)
08:47:08.01 +18:25:17.0 Callisto (6.8mag)
08:44:09.11 +18:29:18.0 Himalia (15.7mag)
08:46:37.07 +18:27:32.4 Thebe (16.6mag)
08:43:43.70 +18:27:00.9 Elara (17.7mag)
08:50:47.23 +18:04:57.4 Pasiphae (17.9mag)
08:49:33.23 +18:38:35.3 Carme (19.0mag)
00:55:57.14 +03:11:38.7 Titan (8.4mag)
00:56:05.69 +03:11:45.4 Rhea (9.7mag)
00:56:24.79 +03:11:40.3 Iapetus (11.1mag)
00:56:02.56 +03:11:23.2 Hyperion (14.4mag)
00:55:21.69 +03:04:42.9 Phoebe (16.4mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Aug 12 03:25 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461264.84930185:
19:19:57.25 -20:48:18.1 JWST
18:31:36.14 +19:26:39.9 Chandra
10:42:52.59 -58:39:01.2 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Aug 12 03:25 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461264.84930185 -observatory V36
03:18:15.50 +17:42:54.2 17.6mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist)
18:00:47.33 -34:35:47.0 14.0mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
06:57:35.98 -69:03:31.1 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
06:10:53.06 +33:04:54.2 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
03:55:37.66 +39:20:54.9 17.0mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
22:35:12.51 +31:11:00.5 17.3mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
06:47:33.23 +26:28:08.3 16.8mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
10:25:23.62 +28:17:06.3 17.0mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
09:31:37.78 +05:18:31.5 17.9mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
15:13:13.08 -12:26:57.1 17.9mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
21:05:21.27 +65:31:42.8 17.9mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
15:43:55.86 -13:19:13.0 14.4mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
08:12:41.07 +31:32:02.0 15.4mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:06:22.25 +15:35:21.4 17.8mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
18:58:01.45 +43:17:16.7 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
21:04:34.82 +49:25:55.3 17.6mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS)
05:18:24.15 -12:55:38.0 15.4mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
06:58:51.93 +23:25:34.2 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
07:32:29.35 -16:43:25.1 17.9mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS)
10:38:41.24 +20:38:28.6 17.2mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
13:00:39.79 +02:04:19.5 16.9mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
16:03:04.97 +77:25:33.2 16.7mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
03:08:47.71 +46:15:42.1 17.2mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
11:50:13.32 +08:58:41.0 17.3mag A/2026 E1
22:02:46.12 -28:57:59.3 6.9mag 10P/Tempel
11:31:27.17 -03:39:24.7 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
04:44:16.79 +32:49:31.2 18.0mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson
11:16:06.11 +03:17:24.7 17.3mag 63P/Wild
00:53:50.66 -05:36:42.1 15.4mag 65P/Gunn
05:44:52.27 +20:36:44.6 13.7mag 78P/Gehrels
20:34:14.42 -23:59:33.3 17.7mag 84P/Giclas
03:04:37.60 +13:59:00.2 16.8mag 88P/Howell
08:06:21.12 +27:05:22.0 16.2mag 93P/Lovas
04:18:02.00 +18:28:51.1 17.5mag 112P/Urata-Niijima
06:10:06.39 +29:50:13.3 16.2mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
09:28:16.19 +25:56:21.0 15.0mag 123P/West-Hartley
11:51:59.90 -11:50:52.8 17.1mag 124P/Mrkos
05:42:36.83 +21:09:28.7 16.1mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
06:35:32.46 +18:41:34.0 17.9mag 131P/Mueller
00:02:36.65 +03:21:20.0 17.5mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma
03:18:27.11 -19:00:44.2 13.6mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
07:30:21.63 +37:59:18.0 15.9mag 162P/SidingSpring
13:48:44.50 +41:19:05.0 12.0mag 169P/NEAT
02:50:23.12 +09:33:05.3 17.6mag 220P/McNaught
16:43:52.19 -10:23:29.8 17.8mag 235P/LINEAR
20:19:51.90 -52:42:28.6 17.9mag 259P/Garradd
03:34:10.42 +26:53:37.6 15.3mag 260P/McNaught
07:17:48.15 +37:36:02.7 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR
15:11:53.57 +02:40:55.3 17.8mag 391P/Kowalski
09:04:39.23 +18:10:22.2 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.5K Aug 12 03:25 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40  AT2026wdy  2026-08-5.05 16.08
22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90  AT2026wek  2026-08-3.82 17.17
14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60  ASASSN-26ev  2026-08-2.15 14.02
12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20  SN2026wgm  2026-08-1.73 15.61
16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00  ASASSN-26er  2026-07-25.82 15.09
01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00  SN2026vbh  2026-07-25.61 15.97
21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90  ASASSN-26eq  2026-07-24.37 15.13
18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60  ASASSN-26ep  2026-07-23.47 -4.06
12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50  ASASSN-26et  2026-07-22.76 13.98
13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60  SN2026uwk  2026-07-21.75 16.38
18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90  ASASSN-26en  2026-07-21.77 14.63
14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10  ASASSN-26es  2026-07-20.79 15.36
20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00  ASASSN-26em  2026-07-20.94 16.83
18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70  ASASSN-26eu  2026-07-20.93 14.86
03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40  AT2026ugi  2026-07-20.03 17.12
18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80  ASASSN-26eo  2026-07-19.36 16.16
04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80  ASASSN-26ej  2026-07-16.17 17.02
18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90  ASASSN-26ek  2026-07-16.24 15.73
17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50  ASASSN-26el  2026-07-15.86 16.01
14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30  ASASSN-26ei  2026-07-16.17 16.46
10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10  AT 2023mhb  2026-07-14.73 16.67
14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20  AT 2026unl  2026-07-15.27 17.11
10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80  ASASSN-26eh  2026-07-14.72 16.58
19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80  ASASSN-22le  2026-07-14.15 15.5
02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30  ASASSN-26ef  2026-07-12.35 15.86
23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70  SN 2026qtn  2026-07-12.22 16.47
02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40  ASASSN-26ec  2026-07-11.53 2.78
18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50  AT2026stb  2026-07-11.28 -1.29
13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00  AT2026pjf  2026-07-10.18 -0.72
17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70  SN2026pir  2026-07-9.86 -0.66
11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30  ASASSN-26ed  2026-07-8.8 -1.3
23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10  AT2026qil  2026-07-9.3 16.15
20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10  ASASSN-26ee  2026-07-7.22 15.53
19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80  AT2026ryu  2026-07-7.17 14.88
11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50  AT2026qqg  2026-07-5.01 16.82
19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30  AT2026qly  2026-07-5.02 17.31
17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10  ASASSN-26ea  2026-07-5.07 16.67
19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30  ASASSN-26eb  2026-07-4.97 15.52
18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20  SN 2026qqp  2026-07-5.03 -0.92
19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90  ASASSN-26dz  2026-07-5.14 15.91
19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90  AT 2026rdg  2026-07-3.43 11.81
04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40  AT 2026qpr  2026-06-30.4 15.96
13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80  SN 2026pub  2026-06-30.09 16.01
16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70  SN 2026pel  2026-06-26.38 16.07
10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30  ASASSN-26dy  2026-06-25.99 15.63
14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30  ASASSN-26dv  2026-06-23.03 14.62
13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70  ASASSN-26dw  2026-06-23.04 16.09
00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20  SN 2026mke  2026-06-22.39 17.13
11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50  SN 2026nmv  2026-06-22.06 16.56
21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50  AT2026oxh  2026-06-22.15 17.14
17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90  ASASSN-26dx  2026-06-22.02 14.72
14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10  AT2026pvk  2026-06-22.06 16.53
20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20  AT2026plb  2026-06-21.31 16.4
15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30  SN2026ore  2026-06-21.29 17.57
23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30  AT2026oxl  2026-06-21.52 17.64
17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20  AT2026ouj  2026-06-20.92 15.15
00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20  AT2026ntk  2026-06-18.09 17.34
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20  ASASSN-26du  2026-06-15.39 15.93
23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00  SN2026oxc  2026-06-14.35 16.83
02:02:26.67 +32:04:22.70  AT2026ovz  2026-06-14.6 15.52
21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50  AT2026nwc  2026-06-11 17.05
17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20  SN 2026odc  2026-06-11.23 17.62
13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20  SN 2026nyq  2026-06-11.1 16.24
00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90  ASASSN-26dt  2026-06-11.13 10.22
14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60  SN2026nyp  2026-06-10.3 16.32
12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50  SN2026mta  2026-06-8.29 16.69
12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20  SN2026oao  2026-06-9.32 17.02
10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60  AT2026nvf  2026-06-8.12 16.75
13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00  SN2026npn  2026-06-8.02 17.58
00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20  ASASSN-26dq  2026-06-7.43 13.58
01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70  SN 2026obc  2026-06-7.43 15.15
21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90  ASASSN-26dr  2026-06-7.24 16.24
06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00  ASASSN-26ds  2026-06-2.97 15.02
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40  SN2026mho  2026-05-25.18 -1.12
11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10  AT2026min  2026-05-24.21 16.63
11:44:33.11 -68:48:32.90  ASASSN-26no  2026-05-24.03 8.35
19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60  ASASSN-26dp  2026-05-22.31 -3.28
14:23:56.59 -58:37:47.40  ASASSN-26dn  2026-05-20.01 14.59
11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60  AT2026nma  2026-05-20.29 15.46
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10  AT2026lli  2026-05-19.34 15.86
00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70  AT2026nad  2026-05-19.39 15.34
15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40  ASASSN-26dm  2026-05-19.03 14.44
11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10  ASASSN-26dl  2026-05-18.02 13.55
13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00  ASASSN-26dk  2026-05-18.16 12.96
02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60  ASASSN-26dh  2026-05-18.43 15.37
17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90  ASASSN-26dj  2026-05-17.05 15.7
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10  ASASSN-26dg  2026-05-13.41 16.8
16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40  AT2026mhn  2026-05-12.33 15.8
09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00  ASASSN-26di  2026-05-12.14 14.63
21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00  AT2026kwu  2026-05-12.26 16.9
14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90  AT2026ktm  2026-05-12.06 17.21
14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40  AT2026lkm  2026-05-11.18 16.89
12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80  SN2026kep  2026-05-9.06 17.5
13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90  AT2026lkd  2026-05-9.09 17.23
09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60  SN2026kmo  2026-05-8.99 17.51
15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.40  AT2026lxf  2026-05-8.07 13.88
10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30  ASASSN-26df  2026-05-8.21 16.52
22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60  2026lda  2026-05-7.56 16.2
21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30  ASASSN-26de  2026-05-6.29 14.51
16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60  ASASSN-26dd  2026-05-5.15 15.93
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Aug 12 03:25 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2  PNV J00424164+4115162  2026-06-02.029  17.4mag
00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2  PNV J00423868+4115582  2026-06-05.1224  19.97Umag
19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7  PNV J19004295-4831017  2026-05-25.0752  14.2mag
09:55:21.28 +69:02:52.6  PNV J09552128+6902526  2026-06-13.933  18.9mag
19:51:21.42 +37:06:40.0  TCP J19512142+3706400  2026-06-17.2942  16.8mag
19:57:03.87 +37:41:46.4  TCP J19570387+3741464  2026-06-18.2638  17.5mag
00:42:32.04 +41:10:28.3  PNV J00423204+4110283  2026-06-26.059  16.6mag
02:19:17.36 +28:57:15.8  TCP J02191736+2857158  2026-07-12.3549  12.5mag
00:44:56.43 +41:57:41.6  PNV J00445643+4157416  2026-07-13.8026  17.98Cmag
00:42:55.36 +41:17:27.0  PNV J00425536+4117270  2026-07-20.1813  17.7mag
20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9  TCP J20354364+6131329  2026-07-20.5443  14.4mag
21:17:31.48 +22:25:51.0  TCP J21173148+2225510  2026-07-23.5577  14.8mag
00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8  PNV J00412404+4049028  2026-07-25.0157  18.7mag
00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6  PNV J00430426+4102286  2026-07-26.1512  20mag
14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0  TCP J14515140+6613240  2026-07-29.2561  13.5mag
00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2  PNV J00430615+4122082  2026-07-30.0085  19.4mag
00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2  PNV J00413323+4110122  2026-08-02.8913  17.1mag
05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4  TCP J05210763+2338194  2026-08-06.4109  11.2mag
22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8  TCP J22571796+4707418  2026-08-09.3289  14.3mag
09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1  PSN J09133817+7628181  2026-08-09.8037  15.4mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 190K Aug 12 03:25 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
15:46:09.135 -15:58:25.09  AT 2026wkw  2026-07-31.36 19.8
13:53:14.217 +00:26:52.06  SN 2026wkv  2026-07-30.74 18.054
12:46:12.738 -00:32:22.57  AT 2026wku  2026-07-27.73 17.881
14:59:06.616 -33:33:54.40  AT 2026wkt  2026-07-30.35 19.38
14:27:45.342 -34:56:01.55  AT 2026wks  2026-07-20.35 19.67
13:56:36.306 +24:20:19.94  AT 2026wkr  2026-07-26.26 20.79
04:21:40.519 +01:35:37.73  AT 2026wkq  2026-07-29.49 19.7461
04:42:25.636 -13:42:39.90  AT 2026wkp  2026-07-30.82 17.8
14:14:51.942 +05:35:17.78  AT 2026wko  2026-07-25.27 19.34
17:23:28.659 +34:49:50.41  AT 2026wkn  2026-07-25.40 20.48
21:27:14.390 -59:26:36.58  AT 2026wkm  2026-07-27.52 19.04
23:14:16.708 -62:43:02.28  AT 2026wkl  2026-07-27.60 19.31
01:06:45.509 -33:11:24.27  AT 2026wkk  2026-07-28.65 19.45
14:49:28.663 -40:20:05.28  AT 2026wkj  2026-07-30.38 19.15
19:41:08.176 +60:49:17.78  AT 2026wki  2026-07-29.24 18.4015
03:20:44.582 +37:42:47.78  AT 2026wkh  2026-07-22.48 20.6516
00:18:49.899 -10:22:01.22  AT 2026wkg  2026-07-29.46 19.8195
01:06:24.322 -02:43:25.85  AT 2026wkf  2026-06-17.47 19.3892
02:53:58.624 +77:22:57.15  AT 2026wke  2026-07-29.51 18.8918
02:09:48.759 +28:17:55.95  AT 2026wkd  2026-07-08.47 20.3205
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 87K Aug 12 03:25 tns_transients_list.txt

=== Transient Factory Profiling ===
Started: Wed Aug 12 03:25:17 CDT 2026
=======================================
TIMING SExtractor: 3 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 0 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 1 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 1 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 6s (0.10 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 33s (0.55 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 1s (0.02 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 5s (0.08 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 0s (0.00 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 0s (0.00 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 4s (0.07 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 0s (0.00 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 49s (0.82 min)
TIMING SExtractor: 9 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 2 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 1 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 3 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 17s (0.28 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 1s (0.02 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 0s (0.00 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 10s (0.17 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 1s (0.02 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 1s (0.02 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 2s (0.03 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 0s (0.00 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 5s (0.08 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 35s (0.58 min)
FIELD_Cam-05-Q1b1x1: 102s (1.70 min)
=======================================
TOTAL_RUNTIME: 105s (1.75 min)
Finished: Wed Aug 12 03:27:02 CDT 2026