NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields UMa-01-Q1b1x1

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 0

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field UMa-01-Q1b1x1 reference image: UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
Field UMa-01-Q1b1x1 reference image: UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
Field UMa-01-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-14-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits
Field UMa-01-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
UMa-01-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting UMa-01-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing UMa-01-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 491766 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 491766 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-14-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-14-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits_preview.png'
UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-14-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits

renamed 'UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits_preview.png'
UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 533.1221 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 561.4736 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1234.2509 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 422.6522 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1234.8302 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 422.0109 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.31514 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.002 INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 31.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 30.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-14-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-14-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-14-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-12T00:14:58.4704875' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-12T05:14:58.4704875' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61264.2187322918 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-12T05:15:08.3740534' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61264.2188469213 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 143.99934429767 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 69.9995119204149 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 15.4766666666667 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 350.669444444444 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 3.69918895975977 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '09 36 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+70 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29517 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29517 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 31.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 31.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 14.5 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 39.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 899.59 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 30.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 23.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 20.201616 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 14.801184 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-14-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-14-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-14-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/d_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-14-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits :) Spent 0.619130 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/d_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-14-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 26658.571233 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-14-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=17308.5, right_median=19900.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-14-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 31.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 29.6 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-12T00:15:53.6387574' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-12T05:15:53.6387574' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61264.2193708103 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-12T05:16:03.5411870' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61264.2194854282 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 143.99934423097 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 69.9995119707764 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 15.4466666666667 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 350.743055555556 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 3.70600015359309 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '09 36 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+70 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29517 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29517 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 31.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 31.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 14.6 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 40.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 899.8 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 29.6 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 18.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 23.801904 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 13.00104 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/d_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits :) Spent 0.617793 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/d_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 26658.571233 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=17308.5, right_median=19900.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-14-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-14-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits


fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-14-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-14-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461264.71884803 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits' wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits' wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-14-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-14-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-14-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-14-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits' wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits' ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits Image size: 941.6'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 09:36:20.346 +69:59:16.26 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-14-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-14-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits Image size: 941.4'x628.0' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.90"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 09:36:00.239 +69:56:49.29 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 09:36:20.346 +69:59:16.26 Second-epoch image center 09:36:00.239 +69:56:49.29 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0499 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits Image size: 941.4'x628.0' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.90"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 09:35:57.539 +69:56:58.44 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 09:36:20.346 +69:59:16.26 Second-epoch image center 09:35:57.539 +69:56:58.44 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0503 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 09:36:00.239 +69:56:49.29 Second-epoch second image center 09:35:57.539 +69:56:58.44 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00462 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits &> /tmp/tmp.tR8u6XIc9B Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vXYdiiJ66Q Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-14-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4ERFosniZG Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-14-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits &> /tmp/tmp.sc5faE5PFa Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits and wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits and wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits and wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 8779 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 117.0324 to 171.9972 deg, Dec +62.9079 to +75.4793 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 117.0324 to 171.9972 deg, Dec 62.9079 to 75.4793 deg Loaded 9306 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5117 out of 5413 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5413 out of 8779 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.870000 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.870000 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.53 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.34 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.34
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 8779 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 117.0324 to 171.9972 deg, Dec +62.9079 to +75.4793 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 117.0324 to 171.9972 deg, Dec 62.9079 to 75.4793 deg Loaded 9306 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5117 out of 5413 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5413 out of 8779 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits (aperture=6.1) Read 8894 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 117.0326 to 171.9963 deg, Dec +62.9079 to +75.4793 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 117.0326 to 171.9963 deg, Dec 62.9079 to 75.4793 deg Loaded 9306 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5133 out of 5416 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5416 out of 8894 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits (aperture=6.1) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.1 pix UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits 2.1 pix UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits 2.2 pix fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-14-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits 2.2 pix fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.3 mag. UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits 15.4 mag. UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits 14.0 mag. fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-14-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits 14.0 mag. fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.0 (SNR ) 11.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.tR8u6XIc9B (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=680, bad_region=0, passed=8779 Got 8779 stars (including 8092 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8779 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.9 to 75.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4890 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4886 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8779 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.9 to 75.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4890 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8779 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8779 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Excluding outliers - 4886 stars left (next iteration limit 5374) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits N_match=4886 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.507 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.300 n_q1=1067 n_q2=1443 n_q3=1095 n_q4=1281 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.381 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits -region wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.vXYdiiJ66Q (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=664, bad_region=0, passed=8894 Got 8894 stars (including 8220 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8894 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.9 to 75.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4892 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4886 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8894 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.9 to 75.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4892 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8894 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8894 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Excluding outliers - 4886 stars left (next iteration limit 5374) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits N_match=4886 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.498 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.309 n_q1=1066 n_q2=1431 n_q3=1117 n_q4=1272 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.353 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits -region wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.4ERFosniZG (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-14-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-14-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-14-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-14-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-14-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-14-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-14-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-14-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-14-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-14-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-14-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-14-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-14-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-14-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-14-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=211, bad_region=0, passed=4371 Got 4371 stars (including 4158 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-14-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4371 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 767 to 828 (Dec 63.4 to 75.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4058 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4053 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4053 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4053 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4371 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 767 to 828 (Dec 63.4 to 75.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4059 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4054 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4371 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4054 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4371 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52" Excluding outliers - 4054 stars left (next iteration limit 4458) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4054 robust_rms=11.126 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.855 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4054 robust_rms=0.802 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.953 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4054 robust_rms=0.637 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.847 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4054 robust_rms_before=1.194 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.564 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.637 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.749 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.847 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.749 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-14-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits N_match=4054 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.568 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.449 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.546 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.596 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.745 n_q1=1061 n_q2=1224 n_q3=909 n_q4=860 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.311 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-14-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-14-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-14-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-14-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-14-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.sc5faE5PFa (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=204, bad_region=0, passed=4359 Got 4359 stars (including 4150 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4359 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 767 to 828 (Dec 63.4 to 75.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4052 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4047 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4047 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4047 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4359 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 767 to 828 (Dec 63.4 to 75.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4052 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4046 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4359 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4046 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4359 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51" Excluding outliers - 4046 stars left (next iteration limit 4451) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4046 robust_rms=11.252 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.328 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4046 robust_rms=0.796 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=1.105 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4046 robust_rms=0.624 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.856 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4046 robust_rms_before=1.143 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.556 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.624 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.732 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.856 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.732 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits N_match=4046 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.561 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.452 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.536 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.604 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.732 n_q1=1047 n_q2=1230 n_q3=923 n_q4=846 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.304 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits sigma_overall=0.367 worst_q_ratio=1.381 ref2=UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits sigma_overall=0.368 worst_q_ratio=1.353 new1=fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-14-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits sigma_overall=0.568 worst_q_ratio=1.311 new2=fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits sigma_overall=0.561 worst_q_ratio=1.304 reference average sigma_overall=0.3675 worst_q_ratio=1.367 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292_astrometric_residuals.png (4886 matched stars from wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293_astrometric_residuals.png (4886 matched stars from wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-14-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030_astrometric_residuals.png (4054 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-14-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.50 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031_astrometric_residuals.png (4046 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.49 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-14-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-14-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-14-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20513_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 The candidate 20513_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 12.21949    2461264.71949    10.63    10:01:20.58 +74:13:24.1   3904 0511   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits **** FOUND 10:01:20.55 +74:13:24.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 01412_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 The candidate 01412_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 08 12.21949    2461264.71949    10.56    08:04:00.22 +73:24:29.1   8841 0577   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits **** FOUND 08:04:00.23 +73:24:29.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 04047_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 The candidate 04047_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 08 12.21949    2461264.71949    7.15    10:44:37.51 +68:46:32.2   1074 3168   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits **** FOUND 10:44:37.59 +68:46:32.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 01377_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 The candidate 01377_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 08 12.21949    2461264.71949    10.44    10:55:39.71 +71:52:06.3   1211 1217   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits **** FOUND 10:55:39.74 +71:52:06.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-14-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-14-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-14-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-14-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits Image size: 941.6'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 09:36:20.346 +69:59:16.26 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-14-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-14-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits Image size: 941.4'x628.0' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.90"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 09:36:00.239 +69:56:49.29 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 09:36:20.346 +69:59:16.26 Second-epoch image center 09:36:00.239 +69:56:49.29 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0499 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits Image size: 941.4'x628.0' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.90"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 09:35:57.539 +69:56:58.44 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 09:36:20.346 +69:59:16.26 Second-epoch image center 09:35:57.539 +69:56:58.44 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0503 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 09:36:00.239 +69:56:49.29 Second-epoch second image center 09:35:57.539 +69:56:58.44 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00462 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UeLkwvH2iD Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XEe4Px4NbW Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-14-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rd3onGAMEo Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-14-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dW2MaLOg7M Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits and wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits and wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits and wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 51532 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 116.7731 to 172.6868 deg, Dec +62.8119 to +75.4848 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 116.7731 to 172.6868 deg, Dec 62.8119 to 75.4848 deg Loaded 9545 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4865 out of 5490 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5490 out of 51532 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.754400 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.754400 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.25 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.50 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.50
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 51532 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 116.7731 to 172.6868 deg, Dec +62.8119 to +75.4848 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 116.7731 to 172.6868 deg, Dec 62.8119 to 75.4848 deg Loaded 9545 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4865 out of 5490 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5490 out of 51532 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits (aperture=4.7) Read 51887 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 116.6991 to 172.5281 deg, Dec +62.8124 to +75.4915 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 116.6991 to 172.5281 deg, Dec 62.8124 to 75.4915 deg Loaded 9544 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4853 out of 5491 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5491 out of 51887 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits (aperture=4.7) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 51 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 1.9 pix UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits 1.9 pix UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits 2.1 pix fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-14-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits 2.1 pix fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.5 mag. UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits 15.5 mag. UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits 14.3 mag. fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-14-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits 14.3 mag. fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.3 (SNR ) 13.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.UeLkwvH2iD (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=2624, bad_region=3, passed=51519 Got 51519 stars (including 48797 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 51519 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4895 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4894 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51519 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4895 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51519 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51519 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Excluding outliers - 4894 stars left (next iteration limit 5383) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits N_match=4894 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.496 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.286 n_q1=1073 n_q2=1412 n_q3=1115 n_q4=1294 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.422 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits -region wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.XEe4Px4NbW (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=24, blended=2687, bad_region=5, passed=51863 Got 51863 stars (including 49074 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 51863 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4897 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4896 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51863 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4897 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51863 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51863 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Excluding outliers - 4896 stars left (next iteration limit 5385) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits N_match=4896 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.469 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.303 n_q1=1092 n_q2=1397 n_q3=1115 n_q4=1292 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.361 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits -region wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.rd3onGAMEo (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-14-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-14-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-14-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-14-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-14-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-14-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-14-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-14-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-14-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-14-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-14-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-14-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-14-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-14-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-14-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=742, bad_region=4, passed=27236 Got 27236 stars (including 26449 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-14-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27236 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.3 to 75.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4885 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4883 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27236 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.3 to 75.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4885 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27236 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27236 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50" Excluding outliers - 4883 stars left (next iteration limit 5371) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-14-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-14-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits N_match=4883 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.559 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.461 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.540 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.616 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.731 n_q1=1330 n_q2=1482 n_q3=1086 n_q4=985 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.307 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-14-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-14-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-14-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-14-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-14-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.dW2MaLOg7M (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=744, bad_region=4, passed=27155 Got 27155 stars (including 26368 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27155 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.3 to 75.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4884 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4881 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27155 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.3 to 75.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4884 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27155 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27155 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49" Excluding outliers - 4881 stars left (next iteration limit 5369) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits N_match=4881 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.546 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.446 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.526 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.586 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.731 n_q1=1326 n_q2=1481 n_q3=1091 n_q4=983 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.338 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-14-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-14-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 08:36:55.72 +74:08:27.8: 13.52 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 08:25:19.85 +73:48:05.8: 13.01 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 08:58:45.45 +72:03:54.2: 13.13 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 09:08:13.62 +73:56:50.9: 13.36 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 09:54:38.68 +68:36:08.9: 13.82 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 08:58:45.45 +72:03:54.2: 13.14 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 09:54:38.68 +68:36:08.9: 13.74 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.13 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 08:25:19.85 +73:48:05.8: 12.93 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.77 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:58:45.45 +72:03:54.2: ref_mag=13.13 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3696 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 08:36:55.72 +74:08:27.8: 13.50 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:54:38.68 +68:36:08.9: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5152 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 09:08:13.62 +73:56:50.9: 13.44 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.96 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.51 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:25:19.85 +73:48:05.8: ref_mag=12.96 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1939 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:36:55.72 +74:08:27.8: ref_mag=13.51 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6586 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:08:13.62 +73:56:50.9: ref_mag=13.40 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.8664 delta=-0.47 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 08:59:18.98 +67:23:43.7: 13.13 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 08:37:19.45 +72:54:31.1: 13.49 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 09:34:45.43 +69:51:32.9: 13.63 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 08:56:30.62 +72:53:03.1: 13.87 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 09:59:31.95 +70:11:31.7: 14.27 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 08:59:18.98 +67:23:43.7: 13.09 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.11 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:59:18.98 +67:23:43.7: ref_mag=13.11 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9979 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 08:37:19.45 +72:54:31.1: 13.60 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:37:19.45 +72:54:31.1: ref_mag=13.54 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3765 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 09:34:45.43 +69:51:32.9: 13.66 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:34:45.43 +69:51:32.9: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4335 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 08:56:30.62 +72:53:03.1: 13.92 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.89 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:56:30.62 +72:53:03.1: ref_mag=13.89 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8082 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 09:59:31.95 +70:11:31.7: 14.38 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.32 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:59:31.95 +70:11:31.7: ref_mag=14.32 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0837 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90) make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 2s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 65334_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 The candidate 65334_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 12.21885    2461264.71885    13.92    09:08:13.64 +73:56:51.3   6089 0789   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-14-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 12.21949    2461264.71949    13.84    09:08:13.61 +73:56:50.5   6087 0791   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 65336_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 The candidate 65336_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 12.21885    2461264.71885    13.72    08:36:55.60 +74:08:27.8   7370 0508   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-14-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 12.21949    2461264.71949    13.61    08:36:55.84 +74:08:27.9   7367 0510   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 65337_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 The candidate 65337_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 12.21885    2461264.71885    13.55    09:54:38.70 +68:36:07.4   3723 3904   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-14-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 12.21949    2461264.71949    13.48    09:54:38.65 +68:36:10.3   3721 3905   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 65340_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 The candidate 65340_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 12.21949    2461264.71949    13.86    08:19:13.92 +73:14:14.2   8227 0873   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 65342_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 The candidate 65342_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 12.21885    2461264.71885    13.37    08:58:45.55 +72:03:54.2   6590 1889   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-14-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 12.21949    2461264.71949    13.37    08:58:45.34 +72:03:54.2   6588 1890   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 65343_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 The candidate 65343_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 12.21885    2461264.71885    13.20    08:25:19.93 +73:48:05.9   7889 0604   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-14-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 12.21949    2461264.71949    13.19    08:25:19.78 +73:48:05.8   7888 0607   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 65346_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 The candidate 65346_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 12.21949    2461264.71949    10.94    10:01:20.60 +74:13:24.0   3904 0511   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits **** FOUND 10:01:20.54 +74:13:23.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 65388_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 The candidate 65388_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 12.21949    2461264.71949    10.29    09:25:28.37 +72:59:49.0   5358 1382   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 65406_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 The candidate 65406_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 12.21949    2461264.71949    10.19    09:24:41.19 +66:16:34.3   5342 5422   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 65412_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 The candidate 65412_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 12.21949    2461264.71949    10.51    08:16:36.68 +71:43:20.3   8582 1727   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 65478_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 The candidate 65478_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 12.21949    2461264.71949    11.43    09:34:25.16 +72:46:24.6   4957 1504   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 65480_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 The candidate 65480_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 12.21949    2461264.71949    11.63    10:53:28.83 +71:22:17.8   1196 1536   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 65482_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 The candidate 65482_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 12.21949    2461264.71949    11.70    10:40:49.94 +72:40:10.7   2026 1004   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 65484_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 The candidate 65484_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 12.21949    2461264.71949    11.68    10:52:21.99 +70:32:26.2   1063 2025   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 65567_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 The candidate 65567_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 12.21949    2461264.71949    12.17    10:06:26.47 +73:43:54.1   3644 0767   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 65590_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 The candidate 65590_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 12.21949    2461264.71949    12.06    09:35:49.07 +70:39:39.2   4821 2769   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 65663_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 The candidate 65663_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 12.21949    2461264.71949    12.03    08:19:55.08 +67:12:35.8   9120 4411   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 65741_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 The candidate 65741_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 12.21949    2461264.71949    12.48    09:54:23.25 +65:07:07.1   3451 5989   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 65752_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 The candidate 65752_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 12.21949    2461264.71949    12.88    10:41:10.09 +70:47:06.7   1646 2079   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 65772_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 The candidate 65772_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 12.21949    2461264.71949    12.25    09:30:23.25 +67:05:31.8   5014 4923   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 65786_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 The candidate 65786_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 12.21949    2461264.71949    13.32    09:21:49.10 +74:52:21.7   5520 0248   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 65799_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 The candidate 65799_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 12.21949    2461264.71949    12.28    09:50:50.05 +66:50:31.3   3801 4983   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 65812_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 The candidate 65812_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 12.21949    2461264.71949    12.88    10:13:55.60 +69:55:15.8   2845 2949   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 65877_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 The candidate 65877_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 12.21949    2461264.71949    13.11    09:06:33.76 +73:11:41.9   6184 1240   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits **** FOUND 09:06:33.83 +73:11:42.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 65910_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 The candidate 65910_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 12.21949    2461264.71949    12.61    09:37:44.13 +64:51:35.3   4494 6247   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 65920_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 The candidate 65920_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 12.21949    2461264.71949    13.59    10:53:40.16 +69:28:36.1   0762 2600   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 65921_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 The candidate 65921_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 12.21949    2461264.71949    13.15    09:34:08.01 +69:51:00.0   4880 3260   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits **** FOUND 09:34:07.93 +69:51:00.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 65952_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 The candidate 65952_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 12.21949    2461264.71949    13.23    08:50:43.68 +73:45:56.7   6830 0829   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits **** FOUND 08:50:43.62 +73:45:56.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 65956_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 The candidate 65956_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 12.21949    2461264.71949    13.08    10:23:30.89 +65:53:00.7   1744 5196   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66030_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 The candidate 66030_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 12.21885    2461264.71885    13.00    08:59:19.07 +67:23:44.6   6823 4688   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-14-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 12.21949    2461264.71949    13.00    08:59:18.89 +67:23:42.8   6820 4690   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66032_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 The candidate 66032_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 12.21949    2461264.71949    13.21    09:13:06.47 +69:38:50.7   5973 3388   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits **** FOUND 09:13:06.47 +69:38:49.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66044_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 The candidate 66044_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 12.21885    2461264.71885    13.36    08:37:19.30 +72:54:30.9   7488 1245   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-14-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 12.21949    2461264.71949    13.40    08:37:19.60 +72:54:31.3   7486 1247   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66052_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 The candidate 66052_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 12.21949    2461264.71949    13.10    09:26:09.39 +66:01:49.3   5250 5569   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66065_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 The candidate 66065_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 12.21949    2461264.71949    13.57    09:22:45.85 +73:33:02.0   5479 1049   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits **** FOUND 09:22:45.86 +73:33:02.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66075_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 The candidate 66075_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 12.21949    2461264.71949    13.36    09:20:35.47 +71:52:31.5   5576 2058   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66106_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 The candidate 66106_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 12.21949    2461264.71949    13.89    10:48:26.20 +65:51:14.3   0250 4763   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66112_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 The candidate 66112_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 12.21949    2461264.71949    13.70    10:32:21.04 +64:01:43.3   0885 6139   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66134_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 The candidate 66134_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 12.21885    2461264.71885    13.44    09:34:45.52 +69:51:33.6   4850 3251   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-14-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 12.21949    2461264.71949    13.43    09:34:45.34 +69:51:32.3   4848 3253   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66142_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 The candidate 66142_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 12.21949    2461264.71949    13.32    10:47:52.62 +65:28:26.1   0202 4993   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits **** FOUND 10:47:52.63 +65:28:26.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66203_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 The candidate 66203_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 12.21949    2461264.71949    14.05    10:51:11.22 +69:43:34.0   0941 2507   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66235_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 The candidate 66235_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 12.21885    2461264.71885    13.77    08:56:30.78 +72:53:04.2   6643 1387   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-14-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 12.21949    2461264.71949    13.85    08:56:30.47 +72:53:02.0   6642 1389   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66237_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 The candidate 66237_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 12.21949    2461264.71949    13.98    07:55:37.67 +73:40:45.4   9132 0297   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66241_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 The candidate 66241_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 12.21949    2461264.71949    13.69    10:37:08.01 +65:04:09.2   0774 5442   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66248_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 The candidate 66248_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 12.21949    2461264.71949    14.00    09:25:38.33 +71:17:50.0   5334 2405   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits **** FOUND 09:25:38.53 +71:17:49.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66351_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 The candidate 66351_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 12.21885    2461264.71885    14.07    09:59:31.97 +70:11:29.1   3605 2923   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-14-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 12.21949    2461264.71949    14.09    09:59:31.93 +70:11:34.2   3603 2923   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66364_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 The candidate 66364_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 12.21949    2461264.71949    13.89    09:02:34.05 +69:05:56.1   6551 3684   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 48389_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 The candidate 48389_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 08 12.21949    2461264.71949    10.66    10:03:56.87 +67:20:18.8   3083 4578   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 62429_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 The candidate 62429_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 08 12.21949    2461264.71949    11.98    09:49:29.32 +73:04:36.7   4308 1267   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 08003_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 The candidate 08003_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 08 12.21949    2461264.71949    10.66    08:04:00.37 +73:24:28.9   8841 0577   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits **** FOUND 08:04:00.32 +73:24:28.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 07628_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 The candidate 07628_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 08 12.21949    2461264.71949    11.05    10:55:39.68 +71:52:06.2   1211 1217   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits **** FOUND 10:55:39.71 +71:52:06.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 23914_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 The candidate 23914_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 08 12.21949    2461264.71949    7.38    10:44:37.55 +68:46:31.6   1074 3168   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits **** FOUND 10:44:37.59 +68:46:31.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 3s Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### Source monitoring: measuring positions from /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-08-12_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001643_TTUQ1b1x1_325942_R4D49r4I/monitoring_positions.txt Read 27248 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 116.1285 to 172.4813 deg, Dec +63.3265 to +75.2750 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 116.1285 to 172.4813 deg, Dec 63.3265 to 75.2750 deg Loaded 9027 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5286 out of 5498 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5498 out of 27248 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-14-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits via Tycho-2 util/pixel_flux_airmass_correction processing wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-14-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits Observation time (mid-exposure, UTC): JD 2461264.71885 (FITS header) Observing site: lat= +33.748056 deg lon= -101.958333 deg east-positive (SITELAT/SITELONG FITS header keywords) Frame center (pixel 4788.5 3194.5): RA= 144.00356 deg Dec= +69.94781 deg Frame center: alt= +15.469 deg az= 349.056 deg airmass= 3.6877 Header cross-check: CENTALT= 15.477 deg (difference -0.007 deg) Header cross-check: AIRMASS= 3.6992 (we compute 3.6877) Airmass zero-point fit: OK k= +0.2924 +/- 0.0031 mag/airmass N= 4067 airmass span 2.5668-6.4897 scatter 0.1598 mag Source monitoring: airmass zero-point for wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-14-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits: OK +1.105626 -0.292372 3.6877 +0.2924 4067 3.9229 0.1598 2.5668 6.4897 Read 27162 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 116.1295 to 172.4748 deg, Dec +63.3265 to +75.2778 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 116.1295 to 172.4748 deg, Dec 63.3265 to 75.2778 deg Loaded 9026 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5276 out of 5494 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5494 out of 27162 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits via Tycho-2 util/pixel_flux_airmass_correction processing wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits Observation time (mid-exposure, UTC): JD 2461264.71949 (FITS header) Observing site: lat= +33.748056 deg lon= -101.958333 deg east-positive (SITELAT/SITELONG FITS header keywords) Frame center (pixel 4788.5 3194.5): RA= 143.99231 deg Dec= +69.95035 deg Frame center: alt= +15.440 deg az= 349.152 deg airmass= 3.6943 Header cross-check: CENTALT= 15.447 deg (difference -0.007 deg) Header cross-check: AIRMASS= 3.7060 (we compute 3.6943) Airmass zero-point fit: OK k= +0.2932 +/- 0.0031 mag/airmass N= 3992 airmass span 2.5564-6.5147 scatter 0.1599 mag Source monitoring: airmass zero-point for wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-12_00-15-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits: OK +1.106956 -0.293211 3.6943 +0.2932 3992 3.9582 0.1599 2.5564 6.5147 ########### Completed UMa-01-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### ################################################################################### renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461264.71884803 -observatory V36 08:25:05.88 +19:47:09.3 Mercury (-1.0mag) 12:16:40.94 -02:59:13.7 Venus (-4.4mag) 06:00:51.99 +23:40:54.6 Mars (1.3mag) 08:46:31.84 +18:27:50.4 Jupiter (-1.8mag) 00:56:05.30 +03:12:11.0 Saturn (0.6mag) 04:12:10.07 +20:58:05.0 Uranus (5.7mag) 00:15:51.45 +00:11:23.5 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:27:45.73 -23:31:41.4 Pluto (14.5mag) 08:59:15.15 +17:53:13.8 Moon (-8.3mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Aug 12 00:35 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461264.71884803: 08:46:27.17 +18:28:11.6 Io (6.1mag) 08:46:42.98 +18:27:01.7 Europa (6.3mag) 08:46:17.86 +18:28:54.0 Ganymede (5.6mag) 08:47:01.06 +18:25:43.2 Callisto (6.8mag) 08:44:02.13 +18:29:39.6 Himalia (15.7mag) 08:46:31.26 +18:27:53.9 Thebe (16.6mag) 08:43:36.64 +18:27:24.1 Elara (17.7mag) 08:50:40.13 +18:05:27.5 Pasiphae (17.9mag) 08:49:26.69 +18:39:00.0 Carme (19.0mag) 00:55:57.36 +03:11:46.8 Titan (8.4mag) 00:56:05.50 +03:11:52.5 Rhea (9.7mag) 00:56:25.25 +03:11:45.5 Iapetus (11.1mag) 00:56:02.78 +03:11:30.5 Hyperion (14.4mag) 00:55:22.63 +03:04:50.8 Phoebe (16.4mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Aug 12 00:35 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461264.71884803: 19:19:59.92 -20:54:28.0 JWST 18:24:27.90 +24:49:21.2 Chandra 09:31:38.54 -53:42:42.6 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Aug 12 00:35 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461264.71884803 -observatory V36 03:18:07.06 +17:42:16.4 17.6mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 18:00:49.00 -34:35:52.2 14.0mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 06:57:28.75 -69:03:12.2 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:10:51.09 +33:04:43.8 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 03:55:15.66 +39:17:50.5 17.0mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 22:35:19.14 +31:11:32.9 17.3mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 06:47:25.56 +26:28:16.4 16.8mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 10:25:16.29 +28:17:27.2 17.0mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 09:31:32.49 +05:18:31.1 17.9mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 15:13:11.51 -12:26:38.1 17.9mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS) 21:05:31.46 +65:32:42.3 17.9mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon) 15:44:02.80 -13:18:30.0 14.4mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 08:12:32.39 +31:31:40.2 15.4mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:06:23.18 +15:35:24.5 17.8mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 18:58:11.02 +43:16:58.5 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 21:04:46.70 +49:25:33.8 17.6mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS) 05:18:18.04 -12:55:41.4 15.4mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 06:58:46.99 +23:26:57.6 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 07:32:26.24 -16:42:16.7 17.9mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS) 10:38:30.04 +20:38:59.6 17.2mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 13:00:34.80 +02:04:51.9 16.9mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 16:03:03.40 +77:26:24.0 16.7mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 03:08:45.71 +46:15:33.5 17.1mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 11:50:06.65 +08:57:53.7 17.3mag A/2026 E1 22:02:39.06 -28:54:56.4 6.9mag 10P/Tempel 11:31:22.33 -03:38:54.8 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 04:44:07.36 +32:48:47.8 18.0mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson 11:15:50.06 +03:19:58.5 17.3mag 63P/Wild 00:53:51.75 -05:36:21.9 15.4mag 65P/Gunn 05:44:34.64 +20:36:56.1 13.7mag 78P/Gehrels 20:34:21.74 -23:58:41.8 17.7mag 84P/Giclas 03:04:30.70 +13:58:28.4 16.8mag 88P/Howell 08:06:01.44 +27:06:28.6 16.2mag 93P/Lovas 04:17:39.45 +18:25:46.2 17.5mag 112P/Urata-Niijima 06:09:40.51 +29:51:11.8 16.2mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 09:27:57.59 +25:57:43.8 15.0mag 123P/West-Hartley 11:51:43.96 -11:47:54.3 17.1mag 124P/Mrkos 05:42:25.39 +21:09:31.9 16.1mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 06:35:19.19 +18:41:58.6 17.9mag 131P/Mueller 00:02:38.50 +03:21:27.7 17.5mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma 03:18:31.33 -19:01:01.9 13.6mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 07:29:54.78 +37:59:01.1 15.9mag 162P/SidingSpring 13:51:27.13 +41:22:17.6 12.0mag 169P/NEAT 02:50:09.63 +09:33:03.7 17.6mag 220P/McNaught 16:43:47.61 -10:22:55.4 17.8mag 235P/LINEAR 20:19:56.86 -52:42:52.9 17.9mag 259P/Garradd 03:33:47.53 +26:50:22.4 15.3mag 260P/McNaught 07:17:24.57 +37:36:18.6 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR 15:11:50.67 +02:41:47.7 17.8mag 391P/Kowalski 09:04:32.04 +18:10:45.6 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.5K Aug 12 00:35 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08 22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17 14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02 12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61 16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09 01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97 21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13 18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06 12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98 13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38 18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63 14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15 20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53 19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82 19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31 17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67 19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52 18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92 19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91 19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81 04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96 13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01 16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07 10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63 14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62 13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09 00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13 11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56 21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14 17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72 14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53 20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4 15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57 23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64 17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15 00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20 AT2026ntk 2026-06-18.09 17.34 20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93 23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83 02:02:26.67 +32:04:22.70 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.6 15.52 21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05 17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62 13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24 00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22 14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32 12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69 12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02 10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75 13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58 00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58 01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70 SN 2026obc 2026-06-7.43 15.15 21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90 ASASSN-26dr 2026-06-7.24 16.24 06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00 ASASSN-26ds 2026-06-2.97 15.02 20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12 11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63 11:44:33.11 -68:48:32.90 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24.03 8.35 19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28 14:23:56.59 -58:37:47.40 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.59 11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46 21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86 00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34 15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44 11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55 13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96 02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37 17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7 01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8 16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8 09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63 21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9 14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21 14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89 12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5 13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23 09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51 15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.40 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.07 13.88 10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52 22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2 21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51 16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.15 15.93 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Aug 12 00:35 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2 PNV J00424164+4115162 2026-06-02.029 17.4mag 00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2 PNV J00423868+4115582 2026-06-05.1224 19.97Umag 19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7 PNV J19004295-4831017 2026-05-25.0752 14.2mag 09:55:21.28 +69:02:52.6 PNV J09552128+6902526 2026-06-13.933 18.9mag 19:51:21.42 +37:06:40.0 TCP J19512142+3706400 2026-06-17.2942 16.8mag 19:57:03.87 +37:41:46.4 TCP J19570387+3741464 2026-06-18.2638 17.5mag 00:42:32.04 +41:10:28.3 PNV J00423204+4110283 2026-06-26.059 16.6mag 02:19:17.36 +28:57:15.8 TCP J02191736+2857158 2026-07-12.3549 12.5mag 00:44:56.43 +41:57:41.6 PNV J00445643+4157416 2026-07-13.8026 17.98Cmag 00:42:55.36 +41:17:27.0 PNV J00425536+4117270 2026-07-20.1813 17.7mag 20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9 TCP J20354364+6131329 2026-07-20.5443 14.4mag 21:17:31.48 +22:25:51.0 TCP J21173148+2225510 2026-07-23.5577 14.8mag 00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8 PNV J00412404+4049028 2026-07-25.0157 18.7mag 00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6 PNV J00430426+4102286 2026-07-26.1512 20mag 14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0 TCP J14515140+6613240 2026-07-29.2561 13.5mag 00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2 PNV J00430615+4122082 2026-07-30.0085 19.4mag 00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2 PNV J00413323+4110122 2026-08-02.8913 17.1mag 05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-06.4109 11.2mag 22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8 TCP J22571796+4707418 2026-08-09.3289 14.3mag 09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1 PSN J09133817+7628181 2026-08-09.8037 15.4mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 190K Aug 12 00:35 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 14:59:06.616 -33:33:54.40 AT 2026wkt 2026-07-30.35 19.38 14:27:45.342 -34:56:01.55 AT 2026wks 2026-07-20.35 19.67 13:56:36.306 +24:20:19.94 AT 2026wkr 2026-07-26.26 20.79 04:21:40.519 +01:35:37.73 AT 2026wkq 2026-07-29.49 19.7461 04:42:25.636 -13:42:39.90 AT 2026wkp 2026-07-30.82 17.8 14:14:51.942 +05:35:17.78 AT 2026wko 2026-07-25.27 19.34 17:23:28.659 +34:49:50.41 AT 2026wkn 2026-07-25.40 20.48 21:27:14.390 -59:26:36.58 AT 2026wkm 2026-07-27.52 19.04 23:14:16.708 -62:43:02.28 AT 2026wkl 2026-07-27.60 19.31 01:06:45.509 -33:11:24.27 AT 2026wkk 2026-07-28.65 19.45 14:49:28.663 -40:20:05.28 AT 2026wkj 2026-07-30.38 19.15 19:41:08.176 +60:49:17.78 AT 2026wki 2026-07-29.24 18.4015 03:20:44.582 +37:42:47.78 AT 2026wkh 2026-07-22.48 20.6516 00:18:49.899 -10:22:01.22 AT 2026wkg 2026-07-29.46 19.8195 01:06:24.322 -02:43:25.85 AT 2026wkf 2026-06-17.47 19.3892 02:53:58.624 +77:22:57.15 AT 2026wke 2026-07-29.51 18.8918 02:09:48.759 +28:17:55.95 AT 2026wkd 2026-07-08.47 20.3205 03:09:37.116 +18:30:08.59 AT 2026wkc 2026-07-25.45 20.1546 13:56:14.022 -17:15:19.11 AT 2026wka 2026-07-28.36 19.18 14:50:39.102 -21:02:49.76 AT 2026wjz 2026-07-28.35 19.12 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 87K Aug 12 00:35 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 92 C