This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_060623_TTUQ1b1x1_2253507_OrUfNphd
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 11.4617 2461263.9617 13.39 06:29:45.27 +31:18:01.3
182.52621 9.50037 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.5" and 8.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.141 Lumen 0 -0 0 13.5 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:29:45.27 +31:18:01.3: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:29:45.27 +31:18:01.3: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461263.9617,13.39,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260811.4617 13.39CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 11.4617 2461263.9617 13.32 06:32:53.13 +25:56:00.9
187.70142 7.74103 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.7" and 8.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.111 Ate 1 -0 1 13.4 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:32:53.13 +25:56:00.9: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:32:53.13 +25:56:00.9: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461263.9617,13.32,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260811.4617 13.32CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 11.4617 2461263.9617 13.07 07:14:50.79 +25:01:13.1
192.58552 15.96693 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 8.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.145 Adeona 0 -1 1 13.5 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:14:50.79 +25:01:13.1: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:14:50.79 +25:01:13.1: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461263.9617,13.07,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260811.4617 13.07CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 11.4617 2461263.9617 11.81 06:32:46.60 +33:12:30.8
181.06150 10.90445 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 8.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.89 Julia 0 0 0 11.6 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:32:46.60 +33:12:30.8: 15.46 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:32:46.60 +33:12:30.8: 15.16 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.26 +/- 0.13
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461263.9617,11.81,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260811.4617 11.81CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 11.4617 2461263.9617 10.65 06:28:29.54 +27:29:09.2
185.85780 7.55832 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 9.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" ASAS J062829+2729.1
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.670 V Y 0.550 V 2452913.90000 117.421794000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:28:29.54 +27:29:09.2: 11.56 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:28:29.54 +27:29:09.2: 11.58 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.57 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J062829+2729.1,2461263.9617,10.65,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J062829+2729.1 20260811.4617 10.65CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.73602979 18.01.2026 05:39:42.974 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
First image: 2461058.73602979 18.01.2026 05:39:42.974 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Last image: 2461263.96194568 11.08.2026 11:05:02.107 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_060623_TTUQ1b1x1_2253507_OrUfNphd/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 5
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.59
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 22848
Objects passed selection criteria: 22738
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 15607.8
Average stars matched: 15168 (97.1825 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 247240 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Aug 6 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-190-gdf2934b0
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Aug 11 06:08:42 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.73602979 18.01.2026 05:39:42.974 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
First image: 2461058.73602979 18.01.2026 05:39:42.974 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Last image: 2461263.96194568 11.08.2026 11:05:02.107 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_060623_TTUQ1b1x1_2253507_OrUfNphd/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 93
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.28
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 29 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 154021
Objects passed selection criteria: 153617
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 111707
Average stars matched: 107372 (96.1186 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 551872 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Aug 6 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-190-gdf2934b0
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Aug 11 06:09:50 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_060623_TTUQ1b1x1_2253507_OrUfNphd/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-04-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_060623_TTUQ1b1x1_2253507_OrUfNphd/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_060623_TTUQ1b1x1_2253507_OrUfNphd/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-04-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_060623_TTUQ1b1x1_2253507_OrUfNphd/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461263.96138105
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits'
wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits'
wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-04-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-04-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-04-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-04-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits'
wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:00.338 +29:59:43.36 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-04-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-04-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
Image size: 942.5'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:02.329 +29:59:56.54 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:00:00.338 +29:59:43.36
Second-epoch image center 07:00:02.329 +29:59:56.54
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0081 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
Image size: 942.4'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:05.221 +29:59:22.43 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:00:00.338 +29:59:43.36
Second-epoch image center 07:00:05.221 +29:59:22.43
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0186 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:00:02.329 +29:59:56.54
Second-epoch second image center 07:00:05.221 +29:59:22.43
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01410 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits &> /tmp/tmp.97yEhRCTQe
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Avv7mSv8mu
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_060623_TTUQ1b1x1_2253507_OrUfNphd/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-04-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits &> /tmp/tmp.OkAJ9gsNV8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_060623_TTUQ1b1x1_2253507_OrUfNphd/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-04-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_060623_TTUQ1b1x1_2253507_OrUfNphd/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits &> /tmp/tmp.EjuRuWL5Cz
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_060623_TTUQ1b1x1_2253507_OrUfNphd/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 24243 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.2299 to 114.2898 deg, Dec +24.1612 to +35.3654 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.2299 to 114.2898 deg, Dec 24.1612 to 35.3654 deg
Loaded 15250 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10848 out of 11975 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11975 out of 24243 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.910000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.910000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.59
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.32
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.32
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 24243 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.2299 to 114.2898 deg, Dec +24.1612 to +35.3654 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.2299 to 114.2898 deg, Dec 24.1612 to 35.3654 deg
Loaded 15250 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10848 out of 11975 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11975 out of 24243 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 24037 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.2298 to 114.2895 deg, Dec +24.1920 to +35.3691 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.2298 to 114.2895 deg, Dec 24.1920 to 35.3691 deg
Loaded 15195 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10824 out of 11955 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11955 out of 24037 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 5 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
2.1 pix Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
2.4 pix fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-04-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
2.4 pix fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
15.3 mag. Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-04-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.8 (SNR ) 11.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.97yEhRCTQe (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_060623_TTUQ1b1x1_2253507_OrUfNphd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2293, bad_region=0, passed=24243
Got 24243 stars (including 21925 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24243 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4828 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4779 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4780 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4779 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24243 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4828 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4779 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24243 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4779 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24243 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4779 stars left (next iteration limit 5256)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits N_match=4779 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.479 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.294 n_q1=1413 n_q2=1099 n_q3=1188 n_q4=1079 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.284
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits -region wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Avv7mSv8mu (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_060623_TTUQ1b1x1_2253507_OrUfNphd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2282, bad_region=0, passed=24037
Got 24037 stars (including 21723 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24037 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4828 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4781 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4782 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4781 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24037 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4828 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4781 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24037 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4781 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24037 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4781 stars left (next iteration limit 5259)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits N_match=4781 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.466 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.284 n_q1=1411 n_q2=1102 n_q3=1181 n_q4=1087 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.238
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits -region wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.OkAJ9gsNV8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_060623_TTUQ1b1x1_2253507_OrUfNphd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_060623_TTUQ1b1x1_2253507_OrUfNphd/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-04-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_060623_TTUQ1b1x1_2253507_OrUfNphd/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-04-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_060623_TTUQ1b1x1_2253507_OrUfNphd/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-04-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_060623_TTUQ1b1x1_2253507_OrUfNphd/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-04-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_060623_TTUQ1b1x1_2253507_OrUfNphd/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-04-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_060623_TTUQ1b1x1_2253507_OrUfNphd/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-04-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-04-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-04-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-04-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-04-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-04-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-04-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-04-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_060623_TTUQ1b1x1_2253507_OrUfNphd/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-04-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-04-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=555, bad_region=0, passed=7451
Got 7451 stars (including 6884 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-04-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7451 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013090 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010472 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4831 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4772 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4775 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4771 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7451 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4829 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4773 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7451 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4773 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7451 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4773 stars left (next iteration limit 5248)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4773 robust_rms=8.313 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=17.412 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4773 robust_rms=0.417 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.446 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4773 robust_rms=0.298 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.346 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4773 robust_rms_before=0.864 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.330 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.298 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.404 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.346
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-04-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-04-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
Image size: 942.6'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:02.323 +29:59:55.74 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 7451 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-04-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_060623_TTUQ1b1x1_2253507_OrUfNphd/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2292379.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.864 -> 0.298 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-04-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits N_match=4773 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.290 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.286 n_q1=1549 n_q2=948 n_q3=1308 n_q4=968 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.175
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-04-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-04-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_060623_TTUQ1b1x1_2253507_OrUfNphd/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-04-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-04-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-04-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.EjuRuWL5Cz (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_060623_TTUQ1b1x1_2253507_OrUfNphd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_060623_TTUQ1b1x1_2253507_OrUfNphd/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_060623_TTUQ1b1x1_2253507_OrUfNphd/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_060623_TTUQ1b1x1_2253507_OrUfNphd/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_060623_TTUQ1b1x1_2253507_OrUfNphd/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_060623_TTUQ1b1x1_2253507_OrUfNphd/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_060623_TTUQ1b1x1_2253507_OrUfNphd/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_060623_TTUQ1b1x1_2253507_OrUfNphd/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=509, bad_region=0, passed=7178
Got 7178 stars (including 6651 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7178 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013089 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010471 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4832 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4769 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4770 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4769 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7178 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4832 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4770 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7178 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4769 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7178 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4769 stars left (next iteration limit 5245)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4769 robust_rms=8.430 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=17.102 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4769 robust_rms=0.405 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.424 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4769 robust_rms=0.283 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.302 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4769 robust_rms_before=0.851 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.325 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.283 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.368 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.302
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
Image size: 942.6'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:05.219 +29:59:21.69 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 7178 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_060623_TTUQ1b1x1_2253507_OrUfNphd/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2292062.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.851 -> 0.283 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits N_match=4769 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.281 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.297 n_q1=1550 n_q2=952 n_q3=1299 n_q4=968 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.124
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_060623_TTUQ1b1x1_2253507_OrUfNphd/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits sigma_overall=0.373 worst_q_ratio=1.284
ref2=Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits sigma_overall=0.376 worst_q_ratio=1.238
new1=fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-04-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits sigma_overall=0.313 worst_q_ratio=1.175
new2=fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits sigma_overall=0.302 worst_q_ratio=1.124
reference average sigma_overall=0.3745 worst_q_ratio=1.261
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226_astrometric_residuals.png (4779 matched stars from wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227_astrometric_residuals.png (4781 matched stars from wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-04-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449_astrometric_residuals.png (4773 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-04-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450_astrometric_residuals.png (4769 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-04-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-04-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_060623_TTUQ1b1x1_2253507_OrUfNphd/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-04-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_060623_TTUQ1b1x1_2253507_OrUfNphd/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31427_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450
The candidate 31427_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:04.57 +25:21:28.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31565_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450
The candidate 31565_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:33:17.56 +31:35:30.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19966_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450
The candidate 19966_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:13.33 +33:22:19.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03075_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450
The candidate 03075_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:34.02 +25:59:44.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13804_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450
The candidate 13804_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:07.06 +30:16:34.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_060623_TTUQ1b1x1_2253507_OrUfNphd/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-04-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_060623_TTUQ1b1x1_2253507_OrUfNphd/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_060623_TTUQ1b1x1_2253507_OrUfNphd/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-04-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_060623_TTUQ1b1x1_2253507_OrUfNphd/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-04-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-04-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:00.338 +29:59:43.36 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-04-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-04-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
Image size: 942.5'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:02.329 +29:59:56.54 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:00:00.338 +29:59:43.36
Second-epoch image center 07:00:02.329 +29:59:56.54
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0081 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
Image size: 942.4'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:05.221 +29:59:22.43 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:00:00.338 +29:59:43.36
Second-epoch image center 07:00:05.221 +29:59:22.43
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0186 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:00:02.329 +29:59:56.54
Second-epoch second image center 07:00:05.221 +29:59:22.43
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01410 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits &> /tmp/tmp.t7BngypIn5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits &> /tmp/tmp.n9oREdwuyO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_060623_TTUQ1b1x1_2253507_OrUfNphd/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-04-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1hpOUn2EHF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_060623_TTUQ1b1x1_2253507_OrUfNphd/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-04-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_060623_TTUQ1b1x1_2253507_OrUfNphd/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits &> /tmp/tmp.GZj9pruuyi
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_060623_TTUQ1b1x1_2253507_OrUfNphd/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 167542 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.1852 to 114.3067 deg, Dec +24.1432 to +35.3660 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.1852 to 114.3067 deg, Dec 24.1432 to 35.3660 deg
Loaded 15347 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8758 out of 12241 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12241 out of 167542 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.776200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.776200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.28
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.50
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.50
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 167542 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.1852 to 114.3067 deg, Dec +24.1432 to +35.3660 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.1852 to 114.3067 deg, Dec 24.1432 to 35.3660 deg
Loaded 15347 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8758 out of 12241 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12241 out of 167542 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 166985 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.2096 to 114.3128 deg, Dec +24.1626 to +35.3760 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.2096 to 114.3128 deg, Dec 24.1626 to 35.3760 deg
Loaded 15290 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8659 out of 12225 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12225 out of 166985 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 88 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
1.9 pix Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
2.4 pix fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-04-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
2.4 pix fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
15.5 mag. Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-04-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.9 (SNR ) 13.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.t7BngypIn5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_060623_TTUQ1b1x1_2253507_OrUfNphd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=53, blended=20873, bad_region=1, passed=167489
Got 167489 stars (including 146337 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 167489 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4800 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4766 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 167489 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4801 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4765 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 167489 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4765 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 167489 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4765 stars left (next iteration limit 5242)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits N_match=4765 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.456 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.268 n_q1=1316 n_q2=1150 n_q3=1167 n_q4=1132 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.303
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits -region wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.n9oREdwuyO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_060623_TTUQ1b1x1_2253507_OrUfNphd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=51, blended=20907, bad_region=3, passed=166934
Got 166934 stars (including 145737 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 166934 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4796 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4765 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4766 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4765 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 166934 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4797 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4765 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 166934 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4764 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 166934 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4764 stars left (next iteration limit 5241)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits N_match=4764 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.265 n_q1=1335 n_q2=1141 n_q3=1157 n_q4=1131 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.301
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits -region wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.1hpOUn2EHF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_060623_TTUQ1b1x1_2253507_OrUfNphd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_060623_TTUQ1b1x1_2253507_OrUfNphd/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-04-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_060623_TTUQ1b1x1_2253507_OrUfNphd/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-04-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_060623_TTUQ1b1x1_2253507_OrUfNphd/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-04-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_060623_TTUQ1b1x1_2253507_OrUfNphd/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-04-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_060623_TTUQ1b1x1_2253507_OrUfNphd/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-04-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_060623_TTUQ1b1x1_2253507_OrUfNphd/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-04-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-04-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-04-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-04-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-04-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-04-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-04-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-04-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_060623_TTUQ1b1x1_2253507_OrUfNphd/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-04-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-04-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=2515, bad_region=2, passed=58304
Got 58304 stars (including 55690 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-04-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 58304 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013090 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010472 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4822 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4768 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58304 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4820 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4767 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58304 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4767 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58304 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4767 stars left (next iteration limit 5242)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-04-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-04-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits N_match=4767 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.285 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.269 n_q1=1536 n_q2=956 n_q3=1290 n_q4=985 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.067
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-04-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-04-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_060623_TTUQ1b1x1_2253507_OrUfNphd/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-04-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-04-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-04-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.GZj9pruuyi (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_060623_TTUQ1b1x1_2253507_OrUfNphd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_060623_TTUQ1b1x1_2253507_OrUfNphd/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_060623_TTUQ1b1x1_2253507_OrUfNphd/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_060623_TTUQ1b1x1_2253507_OrUfNphd/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_060623_TTUQ1b1x1_2253507_OrUfNphd/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_060623_TTUQ1b1x1_2253507_OrUfNphd/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_060623_TTUQ1b1x1_2253507_OrUfNphd/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_060623_TTUQ1b1x1_2253507_OrUfNphd/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=2873, bad_region=2, passed=56852
Got 56852 stars (including 53878 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 56852 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013089 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010471 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4822 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4771 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4772 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4771 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56852 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4821 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4772 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56852 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4772 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56852 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4772 stars left (next iteration limit 5248)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits N_match=4772 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.280 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.270 n_q1=1545 n_q2=952 n_q3=1285 n_q4=990 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.010
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_060623_TTUQ1b1x1_2253507_OrUfNphd/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-04-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_060623_TTUQ1b1x1_2253507_OrUfNphd/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-04-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0449.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-11_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_060623_TTUQ1b1x1_2253507_OrUfNphd/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:10:35.19 +28:52:20.0: 12.80 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:49:06.37 +27:06:22.5: 13.66 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:37:40.17 +28:25:35.1: 12.05 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:49:06.37 +27:06:22.5: 13.67 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:10:35.19 +28:52:20.0: 12.76 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:37:40.17 +28:25:35.1: 12.07 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.78 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.06 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:49:06.37 +27:06:22.5: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7095 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:10:35.19 +28:52:20.0: ref_mag=12.78 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.9687 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:37:40.17 +28:25:35.1: ref_mag=12.06 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4381 delta=-0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:54:05.50 +32:29:27.2: 12.69 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:32:16.03 +27:06:53.5: 12.17 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:11:27.16 +26:25:33.2: 12.47 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:00:00.51 +29:47:12.1: 12.61 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:54:05.50 +32:29:27.2: 12.67 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.68 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:54:05.50 +32:29:27.2: ref_mag=12.68 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5832 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:32:16.03 +27:06:53.5: 12.13 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.15 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:32:16.03 +27:06:53.5: ref_mag=12.15 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2605 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:37:03.61 +32:44:38.7: 12.96 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:46:25.48 +26:07:04.6: 12.80 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:11:27.16 +26:25:33.2: 12.49 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.48 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:11:27.16 +26:25:33.2: ref_mag=12.48 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4610 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:00:00.51 +29:47:12.1: 12.58 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.59 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:00:00.51 +29:47:12.1: ref_mag=12.59 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6076 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:30:53.76 +32:48:17.0: 13.02 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:37:03.61 +32:44:38.7: 13.01 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:46:25.48 +26:07:04.6: 12.76 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.99 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.78 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:37:03.61 +32:44:38.7: ref_mag=12.99 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0190 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:46:25.48 +26:07:04.6: ref_mag=12.78 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.9113 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:18:25.15 +27:14:27.8: 12.84 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:38:02.80 +30:54:10.9: 12.99 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:30:53.76 +32:48:17.0: 13.00 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.01 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:30:53.76 +32:48:17.0: ref_mag=13.01 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0409 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:18:25.15 +27:14:27.8: 12.83 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.84 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:18:25.15 +27:14:27.8: ref_mag=12.84 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8221 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:38:02.80 +30:54:10.9: 12.98 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:40:43.68 +31:30:17.7: 13.34 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.98 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:38:02.80 +30:54:10.9: ref_mag=12.98 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1108 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:26:03.34 +30:18:41.7: 13.32 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:53:52.45 +28:23:48.7: 13.16 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:17:20.48 +26:22:26.5: 12.77 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:40:43.68 +31:30:17.7: 13.28 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.31 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:40:43.68 +31:30:17.7: ref_mag=13.31 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2330 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:41:54.35 +32:38:11.1: 13.25 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:50:17.43 +35:04:47.4: 13.06 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:29:45.27 +31:18:01.3: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:43:22.82 +26:58:48.0: 13.09 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:26:03.34 +30:18:41.7: 13.36 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.34 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:26:03.34 +30:18:41.7: ref_mag=13.34 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4253 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:53:52.45 +28:23:48.7: 13.15 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.16 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:53:52.45 +28:23:48.7: ref_mag=13.16 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1042 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:17:20.48 +26:22:26.5: 12.83 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.80 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:17:20.48 +26:22:26.5: ref_mag=12.80 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9311 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:36:09.19 +26:42:18.3: 13.35 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:41:54.35 +32:38:11.1: 13.22 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.24 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:41:54.35 +32:38:11.1: ref_mag=13.24 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3351 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:50:17.43 +35:04:47.4: 13.06 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.06 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:50:17.43 +35:04:47.4: ref_mag=13.06 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2201 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:43:22.82 +26:58:48.0: 13.10 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.09 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:43:22.82 +26:58:48.0: ref_mag=13.09 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.1599 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:29:45.27 +31:18:01.3: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:09:13.20 +30:08:41.8: 13.11 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:36:09.19 +26:42:18.3: 13.24 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:47:36.55 +30:36:54.2: 13.30 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.29 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:36:09.19 +26:42:18.3: ref_mag=13.29 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4082 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:02:45.23 +27:20:11.2: 13.00 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:43:14.67 +26:58:10.9: 13.36 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:09:13.20 +30:08:41.8: 13.17 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.14 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:09:13.20 +30:08:41.8: ref_mag=13.14 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1318 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:47:36.55 +30:36:54.2: 13.29 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.29 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:47:36.55 +30:36:54.2: ref_mag=13.29 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3348 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:32:53.13 +25:56:00.9: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:38:22.71 +31:11:56.3: 13.25 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:02:45.23 +27:20:11.2: 13.05 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.02 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:02:45.23 +27:20:11.2: ref_mag=13.02 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.1413 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:43:14.67 +26:58:10.9: 13.33 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.34 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:43:14.67 +26:58:10.9: ref_mag=13.34 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.3099 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:14:50.79 +25:01:13.1: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:32:53.13 +25:56:00.9: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:38:22.71 +31:11:56.3: 13.21 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.23 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:38:22.71 +31:11:56.3: ref_mag=13.23 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2888 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:14:50.79 +25:01:13.1: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:36:05.11 +27:46:06.8: 9.69 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:32:46.60 +33:12:30.8: 15.46 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:36:05.11 +27:46:06.8: 9.66 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.67 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:36:05.11 +27:46:06.8: ref_mag=9.67 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.7746 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:32:46.60 +33:12:30.8: 15.16 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:28:29.54 +27:29:09.2: 11.56 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.26 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:32:46.60 +33:12:30.8: ref_mag=15.26 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=11.8077 delta=3.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:28:29.54 +27:29:09.2: 11.58 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.57 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:28:29.54 +27:29:09.2: ref_mag=11.57 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.6495 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out122092.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out193697.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out193844.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out193866.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out56485.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191896_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450
The candidate 191896_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191906_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450
The candidate 191906_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:35:33.84 +26:39:25.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191912_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450
The candidate 191912_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:01.36 +25:15:44.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191916_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450
The candidate 191916_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191918_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450
The candidate 191918_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:17.40 +26:25:50.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191928_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450
The candidate 191928_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191931_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450
The candidate 191931_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:43.87 +29:29:49.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191932_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450
The candidate 191932_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:04.47 +26:33:07.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191934_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450
The candidate 191934_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:50:21.91 +29:19:14.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191935_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450
The candidate 191935_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:28:29.22 +27:36:09.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191981_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450
The candidate 191981_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:04.57 +25:21:28.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192039_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450
The candidate 192039_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:20.65 +24:47:54.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192258_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450
The candidate 192258_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:34:52.05 +31:52:34.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192361_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450
The candidate 192361_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:23:43.83 +34:13:41.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192580_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450
The candidate 192580_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:54.51 +27:49:15.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192738_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450
The candidate 192738_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:35:16.89 +28:00:04.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192744_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450
The candidate 192744_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:39:34.08 +28:18:18.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192759_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450
The candidate 192759_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:35:05.37 +28:00:00.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192786_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450
The candidate 192786_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:50:07.56 +35:04:40.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192843_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450
The candidate 192843_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:10.94 +29:45:00.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192850_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450
The candidate 192850_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:46:17.72 +27:48:52.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192917_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450
The candidate 192917_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192931_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450
The candidate 192931_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192942_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450
The candidate 192942_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:39.12 +27:38:53.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192953_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450
The candidate 192953_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:24:52.09 +29:43:39.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193034_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450
The candidate 193034_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193063_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450
The candidate 193063_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193074_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450
The candidate 193074_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:30:51.05 +32:48:39.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193139_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450
The candidate 193139_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:15.54 +27:12:22.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193155_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450
The candidate 193155_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:52.76 +33:40:02.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193156_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450
The candidate 193156_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:22.67 +25:23:47.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193199_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450
The candidate 193199_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:42:31.31 +27:26:47.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193235_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450
The candidate 193235_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:27:32.43 +29:39:28.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193254_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450
The candidate 193254_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193269_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450
The candidate 193269_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193352_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450
The candidate 193352_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193366_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450
The candidate 193366_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:04.50 +27:12:14.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193369_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450
The candidate 193369_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:30.64 +25:55:47.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193373_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450
The candidate 193373_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:37.35 +26:03:27.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193422_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450
The candidate 193422_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:47.85 +25:27:13.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193446_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450
The candidate 193446_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193449_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450
The candidate 193449_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:30:29.42 +27:25:19.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193455_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450
The candidate 193455_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193471_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450
The candidate 193471_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:49.27 +32:38:03.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193475_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450
The candidate 193475_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:33:47.23 +27:58:07.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193524_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450
The candidate 193524_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:13.41 +26:25:20.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193539_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450
The candidate 193539_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:39:23.40 +26:08:52.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193575_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450
The candidate 193575_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:31.34 +30:38:34.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193593_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450
The candidate 193593_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193609_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450
The candidate 193609_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193612_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450
The candidate 193612_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:25:56.99 +30:18:59.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193624_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450
The candidate 193624_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:39:03.80 +25:33:24.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193632_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450
The candidate 193632_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193637_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450
The candidate 193637_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:23:06.69 +29:16:31.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193643_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450
The candidate 193643_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193654_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450
The candidate 193654_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193665_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450
The candidate 193665_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193676_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450
The candidate 193676_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193697_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450
Preparing report for the candidate 193697_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193709_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450
The candidate 193709_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:40:23.68 +25:04:52.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193738_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450
The candidate 193738_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193740_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450
The candidate 193740_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193747_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450
The candidate 193747_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193752_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450
The candidate 193752_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193798_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450
The candidate 193798_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:15.21 +26:58:35.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193825_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450
The candidate 193825_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193843_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450
The candidate 193843_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:49.70 +33:53:51.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193844_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450
Preparing report for the candidate 193844_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193849_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450
The candidate 193849_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:08.22 +33:08:48.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193851_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450
The candidate 193851_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193861_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450
The candidate 193861_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:13.60 +28:32:39.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193866_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450
Preparing report for the candidate 193866_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193884_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450
The candidate 193884_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:22.68 +33:20:09.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193954_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450
The candidate 193954_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:31:48.84 +33:09:14.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194051_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450
The candidate 194051_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:40:35.12 +31:07:32.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194061_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450
The candidate 194061_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:03.07 +27:02:08.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108118_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450
The candidate 108118_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:42.71 +30:33:44.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80230_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450
The candidate 80230_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:36:14.14 +29:06:15.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58256_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450
The candidate 58256_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146225_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450
The candidate 146225_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:33:17.60 +31:35:30.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32881_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450
The candidate 32881_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:12.41 +26:47:36.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 48598_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450
The candidate 48598_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:36:20.69 +27:15:52.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 122092_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450
Preparing report for the candidate 122092_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127611_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450
The candidate 127611_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:13.32 +33:22:19.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20138_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450
The candidate 20138_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:34.01 +25:59:44.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96257_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450
The candidate 96257_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:07.06 +30:16:34.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56485_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450
Preparing report for the candidate 56485_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166693_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450
The candidate 166693_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-11_06-05-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450 did not pass the final checks
