######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC=
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK=
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN=
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP=
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION=
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER=
HOME=
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory:
UMa-11-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting UMa-11-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing UMa-11-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 762278 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 762278 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-52-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-52-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits_preview.png'
UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-52-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
renamed 'UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits_preview.png'
UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 446.7819
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 471.5037
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1355.6623
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 407.3474
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1368.3431
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 420.1406
----------------------------------------------
INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 3.03428
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.030
INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 29.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-52-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-52-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-52-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
Header: 67 keys total, 4 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-10T22:52:34.7404801' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-11T03:52:34.7404801' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61263.1615131944 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-11T03:52:44.6429361' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61263.1616278011 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 179.997824759483 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 46.0000983507106 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 20.0269444444444 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 312.455 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.8984904880557 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-11' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '12 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+46 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29515 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29515 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 29.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 29.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 56: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 57: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 58: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 59: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 60: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 61: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 62: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 63: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 64: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-52-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-52-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-52-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/d_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-52-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits :)
Spent 0.657400 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/d_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-52-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 26658.571233
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-52-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=17308.5, right_median=19900.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-52-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 29.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
Header: 67 keys total, 4 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-10T22:53:19.6611835' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-11T03:53:19.6611835' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61263.1620331137 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-11T03:53:29.5644081' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61263.1621477315 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 179.997824761289 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 46.0000983813927 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 19.9144444444444 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 312.519444444444 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.91392105025315 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-11' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '12 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+46 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29515 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29515 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 29.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 29.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 56: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 57: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 58: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 59: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 60: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 61: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 62: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 63: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 64: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/d_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits :)
Spent 0.534965 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/d_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 26658.571233
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=17308.5, right_median=19900.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:
Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:
after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-52-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-52-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-52-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-52-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461263.66162894
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits'
wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits'
wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-52-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-52-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-52-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-52-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits'
wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits
Image size: 941.8'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:59:59.840 +46:00:34.73 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-52-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-52-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
Image size: 942.0'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:00.384 +45:59:40.23 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:59:59.840 +46:00:34.73
Second-epoch image center 12:00:00.384 +45:59:40.23
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0152 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
Image size: 942.1'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:01.670 +45:59:59.57 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:59:59.840 +46:00:34.73
Second-epoch image center 12:00:01.670 +45:59:59.57
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0111 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 12:00:00.384 +45:59:40.23
Second-epoch second image center 12:00:01.670 +45:59:59.57
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00654 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nEneEfN4Hq
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits &> /tmp/tmp.oJNneGiHlK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-52-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits &> /tmp/tmp.HfOFWUlPCt
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-52-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8s0S0PlmDO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits and wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits and wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits and wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6312 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 167.3583 to 191.9198 deg, Dec +39.8316 to +51.3978 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 167.3583 to 191.9198 deg, Dec 39.8316 to 51.3978 deg
Loaded 3936 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2810 out of 2955 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2955 out of 6312 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.929550
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.929550
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.48
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6312 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 167.3583 to 191.9198 deg, Dec +39.8316 to +51.3978 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 167.3583 to 191.9198 deg, Dec 39.8316 to 51.3978 deg
Loaded 3936 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2810 out of 2955 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2955 out of 6312 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits (aperture=6.5)
Read 6666 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 167.9142 to 192.3677 deg, Dec +40.1383 to +51.2474 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 167.9142 to 192.3677 deg, Dec 40.1383 to 51.2474 deg
Loaded 3769 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2802 out of 2907 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2907 out of 6666 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits (aperture=6.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits
2.4 pix UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
2.7 pix fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-52-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
2.6 pix fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits
15.5 mag. UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
14.2 mag. fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-52-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
14.1 mag. fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 11.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.nEneEfN4Hq (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=397, bad_region=0, passed=6312
Got 6312 stars (including 5911 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6312 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4846 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4837 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4837 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4837 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6312 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4846 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4837 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6312 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4837 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6312 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4837 stars left (next iteration limit 5320)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits N_match=4837 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.493 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.336 n_q1=1202 n_q2=1130 n_q3=1249 n_q4=1256 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.268
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits -region wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.oJNneGiHlK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=353, bad_region=0, passed=6666
Got 6666 stars (including 6308 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6666 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 650 to 708 (Dec 40.1 to 51.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4840 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4832 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4832 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4832 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6666 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 650 to 708 (Dec 40.1 to 51.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4839 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4831 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6666 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4831 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6666 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4831 stars left (next iteration limit 5315)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits N_match=4831 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.277 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.313 n_q1=1233 n_q2=1155 n_q3=1237 n_q4=1206 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.128
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits -region wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.HfOFWUlPCt (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-52-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-52-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-52-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-52-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-52-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-52-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-52-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-52-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-52-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-52-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-52-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-52-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-52-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-52-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-52-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=141, bad_region=0, passed=3395
Got 3395 stars (including 3249 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-52-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3395 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 40.0 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3163 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3156 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3157 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3156 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3395 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 40.0 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3163 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3156 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3395 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3156 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3395 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Excluding outliers - 3156 stars left (next iteration limit 3471)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3156 robust_rms=10.929 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.460 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3156 robust_rms=0.959 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=1.075 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3156 robust_rms=0.795 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.948 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3156 robust_rms_before=1.361 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.611 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.795 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.650 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.948
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.650 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-52-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits N_match=3156 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.595 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.561 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.645 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.637 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.544 n_q1=888 n_q2=799 n_q3=797 n_q4=672 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.084
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-52-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-52-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-52-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-52-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-52-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.8s0S0PlmDO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=3, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=137, bad_region=0, passed=3211
Got 3211 stars (including 3073 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3211 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013085 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010468 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 40.0 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2997 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2989 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2989 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2989 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3211 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 40.0 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2997 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2989 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3211 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2989 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3211 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Excluding outliers - 2989 stars left (next iteration limit 3287)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2989 robust_rms=11.545 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.721 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2989 robust_rms=0.954 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=1.060 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2989 robust_rms=0.778 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.904 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2989 robust_rms_before=1.341 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.608 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.778 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.671 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.904
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.671 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits N_match=2989 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.618 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.552 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.685 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.668 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.539 n_q1=867 n_q2=743 n_q3=781 n_q4=598 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.109
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits sigma_overall=0.389 worst_q_ratio=1.268
ref2=UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits sigma_overall=0.321 worst_q_ratio=1.128
new1=fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-52-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits sigma_overall=0.595 worst_q_ratio=1.084
new2=fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits sigma_overall=0.618 worst_q_ratio=1.109
reference average sigma_overall=0.355 worst_q_ratio=1.198
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308_astrometric_residuals.png (4837 matched stars from wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256_astrometric_residuals.png (4831 matched stars from wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-52-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090_astrometric_residuals.png (3156 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-52-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.54 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091_astrometric_residuals.png (2989 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.54 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-52-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-52-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-52-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-11-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-11-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-52-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-52-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-52-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-52-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits
Image size: 941.8'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:59:59.840 +46:00:34.73 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-52-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-52-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
Image size: 942.0'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:00.384 +45:59:40.23 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:59:59.840 +46:00:34.73
Second-epoch image center 12:00:00.384 +45:59:40.23
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0152 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
Image size: 942.1'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:01.670 +45:59:59.57 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:59:59.840 +46:00:34.73
Second-epoch image center 12:00:01.670 +45:59:59.57
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0111 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 12:00:00.384 +45:59:40.23
Second-epoch second image center 12:00:01.670 +45:59:59.57
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00654 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fXepQP49n0
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits &> /tmp/tmp.csPtyWwW13
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-52-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits &> /tmp/tmp.yuknDLadEc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-52-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits &> /tmp/tmp.F3y27z2xs9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits and wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits and wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits and wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 30576 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 167.2087 to 191.9198 deg, Dec +39.8316 to +51.4126 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 167.2087 to 191.9198 deg, Dec 39.8316 to 51.4126 deg
Loaded 3968 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2678 out of 2956 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2956 out of 30576 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.820300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.820300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.23
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.59
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.59
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 30576 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 167.2087 to 191.9198 deg, Dec +39.8316 to +51.4126 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 167.2087 to 191.9198 deg, Dec 39.8316 to 51.4126 deg
Loaded 3968 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2678 out of 2956 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2956 out of 30576 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits (aperture=5.1)
Read 29946 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 167.8308 to 192.4263 deg, Dec +40.1383 to +51.2775 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 167.8308 to 192.4263 deg, Dec 40.1383 to 51.2775 deg
Loaded 3794 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2685 out of 2906 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2906 out of 29946 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits (aperture=5.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 42 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits
2.3 pix UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
2.7 pix fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-52-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
2.6 pix fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits
15.6 mag. UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
14.4 mag. fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-52-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
14.4 mag. fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 13.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.fXepQP49n0 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=23, blended=1202, bad_region=10, passed=30553
Got 30553 stars (including 29289 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30553 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4845 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4836 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4836 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4836 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30553 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4845 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4836 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30553 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4836 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30553 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4836 stars left (next iteration limit 5319)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits N_match=4836 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.472 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.328 n_q1=1198 n_q2=1128 n_q3=1256 n_q4=1254 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.279
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits -region wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.csPtyWwW13 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=1201, bad_region=1, passed=29928
Got 29928 stars (including 28680 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29928 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 650 to 708 (Dec 40.1 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4844 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4837 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4837 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4837 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 650 to 708 (Dec 40.1 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4844 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4836 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4836 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4836 stars left (next iteration limit 5320)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits N_match=4836 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.282 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.308 n_q1=1234 n_q2=1181 n_q3=1209 n_q4=1212 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.106
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits -region wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.yuknDLadEc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-52-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-52-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-52-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-52-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-52-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-52-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-52-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-52-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-52-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-52-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-52-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-52-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-52-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-52-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-52-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=692, bad_region=4, passed=16285
Got 16285 stars (including 15563 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-52-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16285 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4825 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4815 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4815 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4815 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16285 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4825 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4815 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16285 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4815 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16285 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Excluding outliers - 4815 stars left (next iteration limit 5296)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-52-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-52-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits N_match=4815 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.603 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.595 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.639 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.642 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.538 n_q1=1377 n_q2=1187 n_q3=1220 n_q4=1031 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.064
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-52-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-52-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-52-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-52-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-52-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.F3y27z2xs9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=606, bad_region=5, passed=15583
Got 15583 stars (including 14957 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 15583 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013085 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010468 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4828 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4815 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4817 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4815 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15583 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4828 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4815 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15583 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4815 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15583 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Excluding outliers - 4815 stars left (next iteration limit 5296)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits N_match=4815 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.623 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.569 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.678 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.662 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.586 n_q1=1434 n_q2=1185 n_q3=1264 n_q4=932 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.089
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-52-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-52-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/wcs_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-11-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_01-00-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0308.fits at 12:34:40.05 +47:32:41.8: 13.66 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_01-06-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 12:34:40.05 +47:32:41.8: 13.66 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.66 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:34:40.05 +47:32:41.8: ref_mag=13.66 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6880 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53170_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 53170_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 11.16215 | 2461263.66215 | 13.62 | 12:38:49.88 +46:09:38.1 | 0762 2600 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53200_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 53200_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 11.16215 | 2461263.66215 | 10.44 | 11:55:25.48 +49:03:21.0 | 5358 1382 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53204_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 53204_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 11.16215 | 2461263.66215 | 10.69 | 11:23:08.03 +48:26:37.2 | 8582 1727 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53206_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 53206_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 11.16215 | 2461263.66215 | 10.91 | 11:54:34.35 +42:06:31.1 | 5250 5569 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53209_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 53209_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 11.16215 | 2461263.66215 | 11.15 | 11:51:34.11 +48:32:26.9 | 5727 1708 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53224_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 53224_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 11.16215 | 2461263.66215 | 11.73 | 12:19:34.45 +49:00:00.6 | 2978 1209 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits |
**** FOUND 12:19:34.46 +49:00:00.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53226_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 53226_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 11.16215 | 2461263.66215 | 11.62 | 11:59:24.26 +48:49:09.2 | 4957 1504 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53227_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 53227_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 11.16215 | 2461263.66215 | 11.86 | 12:36:34.52 +48:00:51.1 | 1196 1536 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53234_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 53234_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 11.16215 | 2461263.66215 | 11.94 | 12:37:00.27 +47:10:55.8 | 1063 2025 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53235_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 53235_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 11.16215 | 2461263.66215 | 11.54 | 11:26:55.12 +48:53:31.5 | 8188 1476 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53242_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 53242_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 11.16215 | 2461263.66215 | 11.56 | 11:22:38.77 +43:28:32.8 | 8795 4734 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits |
**** FOUND 11:22:38.76 +43:28:32.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53250_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 53250_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 11.16215 | 2461263.66215 | 12.18 | 12:06:07.22 +48:11:02.2 | 4262 1839 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53255_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 53255_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 11.16215 | 2461263.66215 | 12.00 | 11:34:57.89 +45:53:50.8 | 7411 3314 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53264_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 53264_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 11.16215 | 2461263.66215 | 12.35 | 11:59:58.58 +46:42:35.5 | 4821 2769 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53269_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 53269_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 11.16215 | 2461263.66215 | 12.23 | 11:16:46.03 +49:26:50.3 | 9185 1071 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits |
**** FOUND 11:16:46.04 +49:26:50.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53270_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 53270_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 11.16215 | 2461263.66215 | 12.26 | 11:37:32.85 +44:41:52.3 | 7145 4042 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits |
**** FOUND 11:37:32.86 +44:41:53.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53284_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 53284_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 11.16215 | 2461263.66215 | 12.78 | 12:33:55.91 +46:45:25.5 | 1334 2335 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits |
**** FOUND 12:33:55.92 +46:45:25.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53302_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 53302_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 11.16215 | 2461263.66215 | 12.45 | 11:29:20.41 +45:03:23.3 | 8022 3807 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53312_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 53312_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 11.16215 | 2461263.66215 | 12.59 | 11:20:39.55 +45:00:34.4 | 8959 3792 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits |
**** FOUND 11:20:39.58 +45:00:34.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53316_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 53316_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 11.16215 | 2461263.66215 | 12.82 | 11:31:03.14 +48:46:54.2 | 7776 1560 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits |
**** FOUND 11:31:03.06 +48:46:54.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53326_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 53326_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 11.16215 | 2461263.66215 | 13.02 | 12:28:14.57 +41:40:42.4 | 1452 5473 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53331_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 53331_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 11.16215 | 2461263.66215 | 13.15 | 12:31:22.54 +47:15:31.4 | 1646 2079 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53338_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 53338_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 11.16215 | 2461263.66215 | 13.13 | 12:15:51.58 +47:05:47.4 | 3215 2395 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53345_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 53345_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 11.16215 | 2461263.66215 | 13.45 | 12:33:34.22 +44:04:44.3 | 1098 3941 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits |
**** FOUND 12:33:34.18 +44:04:43.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53365_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 53365_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 11.16215 | 2461263.66215 | 13.12 | 12:10:14.12 +41:12:59.4 | 3451 5989 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53369_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 53369_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 11.16215 | 2461263.66215 | 13.36 | 12:11:45.56 +50:49:20.4 | 3856 0198 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits |
**** FOUND 12:11:45.59 +50:49:20.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53377_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 53377_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 11.16215 | 2461263.66215 | 13.23 | 12:18:46.81 +46:06:45.8 | 2845 2949 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53443_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 53443_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 11.16215 | 2461263.66215 | 13.51 | 12:10:06.32 +48:31:32.2 | 3883 1598 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits |
**** FOUND 12:10:06.27 +48:31:33.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53518_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 53518_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 08 11.16163 | 2461263.66163 | 13.69 | 12:34:40.05 +47:32:42.8 | 1338 1847 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-52-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 11.16215 | 2461263.66215 | 13.69 | 12:34:40.05 +47:32:40.9 | 1340 1851 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53623_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 53623_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 11.16215 | 2461263.66215 | 13.46 | 12:39:44.04 +42:30:51.8 | 0250 4763 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53653_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 53653_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 11.16215 | 2461263.66215 | 13.83 | 12:26:03.61 +42:11:41.9 | 1744 5196 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53696_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 53696_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 11.16215 | 2461263.66215 | 13.67 | 11:34:51.48 +46:35:11.8 | 7416 2898 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits |
**** FOUND 11:34:51.57 +46:35:09.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53702_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 53702_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 11.16215 | 2461263.66215 | 13.73 | 11:58:03.54 +48:03:18.7 | 5064 1972 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits |
**** FOUND 11:58:03.63 +48:03:20.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53704_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 53704_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 11.16215 | 2461263.66215 | 14.20 | 12:40:32.97 +48:47:18.1 | 0884 0997 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53734_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 53734_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 11.16215 | 2461263.66215 | 14.12 | 12:32:17.85 +48:59:33.6 | 1723 1026 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53746_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 53746_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 11.16215 | 2461263.66215 | 14.09 | 12:41:32.17 +48:08:36.0 | 0711 1363 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53750_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 53750_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 11.16215 | 2461263.66215 | 14.44 | 12:39:24.87 +42:59:59.0 | 0341 4478 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53754_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 53754_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 11.16215 | 2461263.66215 | 14.37 | 12:37:57.61 +45:03:53.1 | 0732 3271 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53756_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 53756_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 11.16215 | 2461263.66215 | 14.32 | 12:34:09.44 +44:48:21.9 | 1110 3496 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53757_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 53757_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 11.16215 | 2461263.66215 | 14.81 | 12:37:19.70 +46:21:52.0 | 0941 2507 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53762_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 53762_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 11.16215 | 2461263.66215 | 14.26 | 12:13:06.88 +41:45:09.6 | 3159 5634 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17345_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091
The candidate 17345_fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 08 11.16215 | 2461263.66215 | 11.89 | 12:15:51.39 +47:06:19.3 | 3216 2390 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_225435_TTUQ1b1x1_3606087_N3OOsGkX/fd_UMa-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_22-53-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits |
**** FOUND 12:15:51.35 +47:06:19.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-11-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
########### Completed UMa-11-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
###################################################################################
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461263.66162894 -observatory V36
08:17:24.75 +20:00:01.5 Mercury (-0.9mag)
12:13:02.40 -02:28:31.3 Venus (-4.4mag)
05:57:48.37 +23:39:58.4 Mars (1.3mag)
08:45:35.00 +18:31:25.1 Jupiter (-1.8mag)
00:56:11.13 +03:13:05.3 Saturn (0.6mag)
04:12:03.44 +20:57:47.9 Uranus (5.7mag)
00:15:55.45 +00:11:52.4 Neptune (7.7mag)
20:27:51.71 -23:31:17.8 Pluto (14.5mag)
07:55:44.45 +22:49:07.4 Moon (-8.6mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Aug 10 22:56 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461263.66162894:
08:45:40.62 +18:31:01.9 Io (6.1mag)
08:45:33.97 +18:31:30.7 Europa (6.3mag)
08:45:24.42 +18:32:10.7 Ganymede (5.6mag)
08:46:02.86 +18:29:25.6 Callisto (6.8mag)
08:43:06.06 +18:32:35.4 Himalia (15.7mag)
08:45:36.98 +18:31:16.8 Thebe (16.6mag)
08:42:39.91 +18:30:32.2 Elara (17.7mag)
08:49:43.01 +18:09:31.1 Pasiphae (17.9mag)
08:48:34.11 +18:42:20.3 Carme (19.0mag)
00:55:59.61 +03:12:53.0 Titan (8.4mag)
00:56:05.17 +03:13:01.3 Rhea (9.7mag)
00:56:28.44 +03:12:26.1 Iapetus (11.1mag)
00:56:04.31 +03:12:30.7 Hyperion (14.4mag)
00:55:29.82 +03:05:53.3 Phoebe (16.4mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Aug 10 22:57 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461263.66162894:
19:15:43.39 -21:30:01.6 JWST
16:29:02.18 +48:47:16.8 Chandra
20:40:19.30 +37:12:37.0 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Aug 10 22:56 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461263.66162894 -observatory V36
03:16:58.03 +17:37:12.6 17.6mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist)
18:01:02.51 -34:36:25.8 14.0mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
06:56:30.58 -69:00:42.7 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
06:10:35.14 +33:03:21.5 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
03:52:17.08 +38:53:30.3 16.9mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
22:36:12.19 +31:15:50.7 17.3mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
06:46:23.65 +26:29:24.2 16.8mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
10:24:17.40 +28:20:16.6 17.0mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
09:30:49.94 +05:18:26.8 17.9mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
15:12:59.14 -12:24:04.0 17.9mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
21:06:53.11 +65:40:34.9 17.9mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
15:45:00.07 -13:12:37.8 14.4mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
08:11:22.58 +31:28:45.8 15.3mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:06:31.13 +15:35:47.0 17.7mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
18:59:28.18 +43:14:15.8 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
21:06:21.88 +49:22:30.1 17.6mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS)
05:17:28.55 -12:56:13.2 15.4mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
06:58:07.31 +23:38:15.1 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
07:32:01.61 -16:33:08.5 17.9mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS)
10:37:00.24 +20:43:07.6 17.2mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
12:59:55.00 +02:09:12.5 17.0mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
16:02:53.60 +77:32:53.2 16.7mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
03:08:28.33 +46:14:31.2 17.1mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
11:49:13.39 +08:51:26.4 17.3mag A/2026 E1
22:01:33.14 -28:30:03.2 6.9mag 10P/Tempel
11:30:43.63 -03:34:53.2 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
04:42:50.97 +32:43:01.7 18.0mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson
11:13:40.88 +03:40:44.7 17.3mag 63P/Wild
00:53:59.27 -05:33:43.3 15.4mag 65P/Gunn
05:42:12.22 +20:38:29.8 13.7mag 78P/Gehrels
20:35:18.85 -23:51:38.3 17.7mag 84P/Giclas
03:03:33.62 +13:54:12.1 16.8mag 88P/Howell
08:03:22.42 +27:15:26.9 16.2mag 93P/Lovas
04:14:37.86 +18:00:58.3 17.5mag 112P/Urata-Niijima
06:06:11.72 +29:59:02.5 16.2mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
09:25:27.77 +26:08:50.6 15.0mag 123P/West-Hartley
11:49:36.07 -11:23:43.2 17.1mag 124P/Mrkos
05:40:53.02 +21:09:59.1 16.1mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
06:33:32.06 +18:45:18.6 17.9mag 131P/Mueller
00:02:52.10 +03:22:25.9 17.6mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma
03:19:03.45 -19:03:36.7 13.6mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
07:26:18.09 +37:56:39.1 15.9mag 162P/SidingSpring
14:13:38.61 +41:36:33.4 12.0mag 169P/NEAT
02:48:18.91 +09:32:48.6 17.6mag 220P/McNaught
16:43:10.69 -10:18:13.9 17.8mag 235P/LINEAR
20:20:32.85 -52:45:39.8 17.8mag 259P/Garradd
03:30:42.15 +26:24:10.9 15.3mag 260P/McNaught
07:14:14.31 +37:38:25.3 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR
15:11:27.67 +02:48:51.6 17.8mag 391P/Kowalski
09:03:34.21 +18:13:54.5 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.5K Aug 10 22:56 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08
22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17
14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02
12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61
16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09
01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97
21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13
18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06
12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98
13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38
18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63
14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36
20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83
18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86
03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12
18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16
04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02
18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73
17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01
14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46
10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67
14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11
10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58
19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5
02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86
23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47
02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78
18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29
13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72
17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66
11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3
23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15
20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53
19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88
11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82
19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31
17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67
19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52
18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92
19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91
19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81
04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96
13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01
16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07
10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63
14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62
13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09
00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13
11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56
21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14
17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72
14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53
20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4
15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57
23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64
17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15
00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20 AT2026ntk 2026-06-18.09 17.34
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93
23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83
02:02:26.67 +32:04:22.70 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.6 15.52
21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05
17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62
13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24
00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22
14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32
12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69
12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02
10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75
13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58
00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58
01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70 SN 2026obc 2026-06-7.43 15.15
21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90 ASASSN-26dr 2026-06-7.24 16.24
06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00 ASASSN-26ds 2026-06-2.97 15.02
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12
11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63
11:44:33.11 -68:48:32.90 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24.03 8.35
19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28
14:23:56.59 -58:37:47.40 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.59
11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86
00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34
15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44
11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55
13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96
02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37
17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8
16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8
09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63
21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9
14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21
14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89
12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5
13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23
09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51
15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.40 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.07 13.88
10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52
22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2
21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51
16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.15 15.93
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Aug 10 22:56 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2 PNV J00424164+4115162 2026-06-02.029 17.4mag
00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2 PNV J00423868+4115582 2026-06-05.1224 19.97Umag
19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7 PNV J19004295-4831017 2026-05-25.0752 14.2mag
09:55:21.28 +69:02:52.6 PNV J09552128+6902526 2026-06-13.933 18.9mag
19:51:21.42 +37:06:40.0 TCP J19512142+3706400 2026-06-17.2942 16.8mag
19:57:03.87 +37:41:46.4 TCP J19570387+3741464 2026-06-18.2638 17.5mag
00:42:32.04 +41:10:28.3 PNV J00423204+4110283 2026-06-26.059 16.6mag
02:19:17.36 +28:57:15.8 TCP J02191736+2857158 2026-07-12.3549 12.5mag
00:44:56.43 +41:57:41.6 PNV J00445643+4157416 2026-07-13.8026 17.98Cmag
00:42:55.36 +41:17:27.0 PNV J00425536+4117270 2026-07-20.1813 17.7mag
20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9 TCP J20354364+6131329 2026-07-20.5443 14.4mag
21:17:31.48 +22:25:51.0 TCP J21173148+2225510 2026-07-23.5577 14.8mag
00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8 PNV J00412404+4049028 2026-07-25.0157 18.7mag
00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6 PNV J00430426+4102286 2026-07-26.1512 20mag
14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0 TCP J14515140+6613240 2026-07-29.2561 13.5mag
00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2 PNV J00430615+4122082 2026-07-30.0085 19.4mag
00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2 PNV J00413323+4110122 2026-08-02.8913 17.1mag
05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-06.4109 11.2mag
22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8 TCP J22571796+4707418 2026-08-09.3289 14.3mag
09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1 PSN J09133817+7628181 2026-08-09.8037 15.4mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 190K Aug 10 22:56 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
01:04:53.230 -71:39:05.30 AT 2026wjh 2026-07-16.42 16.4
00:58:31.660 -71:27:59.50 AT 2026wjg 2026-07-16.42 18.3
23:36:39.726 +47:17:19.48 SN 2026wjd 2026-07-27.53 18.91
00:55:34.820 -72:46:47.10 AT 2026wjc 2026-07-16.42 16.2
14:17:44.540 +12:51:16.83 AT 2026wjb 2026-07-17.18 20.8515
17:52:58.192 +75:02:39.40 AT 2026wja 2026-07-21.39 20.6829
14:08:02.349 +05:23:57.40 AT 2026wiz 2026-07-25.19 19.6571
00:07:25.282 -45:15:05.67 AT 2026wiy 2026-07-27.61 19.39
16:35:19.004 +11:20:30.56 AT 2026wix 2026-07-23.28 20.4579
00:05:45.060 -65:52:10.59 AT 2026wiw 2026-07-28.65 18.66
01:15:51.484 -54:33:23.96 SN 2026wiv 2026-07-28.65 17.28
22:44:13.255 -52:26:09.82 AT 2026wiu 2026-07-20.71 20.48
18:41:21.109 -55:09:12.91 AT 2026wit 2026-07-28.49 18.46
18:58:38.603 -53:05:53.64 AT 2026wis 2026-07-28.49 18.77
16:29:39.070 -57:02:36.70 AT 2026wir 2026-07-21.75 14.7
16:29:46.090 -57:11:01.30 AT 2026wiq 2026-07-21.75 14.4
16:23:48.900 -59:23:33.20 AT 2026wip 2026-07-21.75 16.4
20:01:37.144 +12:07:15.96 AT 2026wio 2026-07-21.36 20.7524
20:39:47.824 -23:38:47.87 AT 2026win 2026-06-27.32 22.789
16:30:35.203 +57:00:36.84 AT 2026wim 2026-07-11.23 20.9956
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 87K Aug 10 22:56 tns_transients_list.txt