######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC=
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK=
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN=
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP=
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION=
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER=
HOME=
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory:
Cet-11-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Cet-11-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Cet-11-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 852208 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 852208 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-50-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-50-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits_preview.png'
Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-50-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
renamed 'Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits_preview.png'
Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1654.6390
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 511.5033
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 3197.6049
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 813.0925
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 3188.3599
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 810.9669
----------------------------------------------
INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 1.93251
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.003
INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 22.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-50-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-50-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-50-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
Header: 67 keys total, 4 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-10T04:50:20.1288789' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-10T09:50:20.1288789' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61262.4099551854 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-10T09:50:30.0332099' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61262.4100698265 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 26.6634663117241 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = -17.9994897939127 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 34.1508333333333 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 154.024444444444 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.77765306416323 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cet-11' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '01 46 40' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-18 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29510 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29510 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 22.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 22.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 56: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 57: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 58: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 59: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 60: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 61: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 62: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 63: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 64: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-50-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-50-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-50-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/d_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-50-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits :)
Spent 0.503870 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/d_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-50-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 26658.571233
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-50-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=17308.5, right_median=19900.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-50-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 22.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
Header: 67 keys total, 4 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-10T04:51:03.6219143' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-10T09:51:03.6219143' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61262.4104585764 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-10T09:51:13.5227323' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61262.4105731715 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 26.6634662296277 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = -17.9994898184222 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 34.2172222222222 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 154.219166666667 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.77464126755511 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cet-11' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '01 46 40' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-18 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29510 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29510 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 22.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 22.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 56: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 57: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 58: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 59: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 60: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 61: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 62: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 63: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 64: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/d_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits :)
Spent 0.501098 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/d_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 26658.571233
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=17308.5, right_median=19900.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:
Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:
after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-50-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-50-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-50-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-50-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461262.91007093
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits'
wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits'
wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-50-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-50-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-50-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-50-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits'
wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:46:40.180 -17:59:54.65 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-50-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-50-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:46:33.390 -18:01:39.44 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 01:46:40.180 -17:59:54.65
Second-epoch image center 01:46:33.390 -18:01:39.44
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0396 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:46:33.997 -18:02:01.21 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 01:46:40.180 -17:59:54.65
Second-epoch image center 01:46:33.997 -18:02:01.21
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0428 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 01:46:33.390 -18:01:39.44
Second-epoch second image center 01:46:33.997 -18:02:01.21
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00651 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WwwRnsmt39
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4w7vQv7FMU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-50-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wWEszbhDoJ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-50-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wFyEMEosHs
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits and wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits and wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits and wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 3748 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 18.1303 to 35.1139 deg, Dec -23.2882 to -12.6120 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 18.1303 to 35.1139 deg, Dec -23.2882 to -12.6120 deg
Loaded 4115 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2743 out of 2866 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2866 out of 3748 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.870000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.870000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.17
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.70
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.70
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 3748 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 18.1303 to 35.1139 deg, Dec -23.2882 to -12.6120 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 18.1303 to 35.1139 deg, Dec -23.2882 to -12.6120 deg
Loaded 4115 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2743 out of 2866 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2866 out of 3748 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits (aperture=6.4)
Read 4329 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 18.3267 to 35.1802 deg, Dec -23.3270 to -12.4424 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 18.3267 to 35.1802 deg, Dec -23.3270 to -12.4424 deg
Loaded 4183 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3033 out of 3123 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3123 out of 4329 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits (aperture=5.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
2.1 pix Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits
2.7 pix fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-50-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
2.7 pix fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.7 mag. Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
14.9 mag. Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-50-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
13.7 mag. fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.7 (SNR ) 11.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.WwwRnsmt39 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=374, bad_region=0, passed=3748
Got 3748 stars (including 3370 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3748 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3308 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3308 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3308 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3308 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3748 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3308 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3308 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3748 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3308 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3748 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 3308 stars left (next iteration limit 3638)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits N_match=3308 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.438 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.322 n_q1=748 n_q2=870 n_q3=779 n_q4=911 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.206
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits -region wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.4w7vQv7FMU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=326, bad_region=0, passed=4329
Got 4329 stars (including 3994 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4329 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3909 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3908 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4329 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3909 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4329 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4329 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 3908 stars left (next iteration limit 4298)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits N_match=3908 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.261 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.244 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.248 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.236 n_q1=929 n_q2=998 n_q3=973 n_q4=1008 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.327
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits -region wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.wWEszbhDoJ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-50-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-50-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-50-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-50-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-50-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-50-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-50-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-50-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-50-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-50-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-50-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-50-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-50-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-50-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-50-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=162, bad_region=0, passed=2293
Got 2293 stars (including 2127 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-50-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2293 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2085 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2085 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2085 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2085 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2293 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2085 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2085 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2293 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2085 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2293 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 2085 stars left (next iteration limit 2293)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2085 robust_rms=11.908 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.507 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2085 robust_rms=0.393 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.412 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2085 robust_rms=0.292 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.334 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2085 robust_rms_before=1.027 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.274 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.292 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.325 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.334
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.325 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-50-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits N_match=2085 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.288 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.269 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.259 n_q1=498 n_q2=511 n_q3=550 n_q4=526 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.147
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-50-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-50-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-50-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-50-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-50-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.wFyEMEosHs (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=155, bad_region=0, passed=2299
Got 2299 stars (including 2141 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2299 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2096 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2096 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2096 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2096 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2299 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2096 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2096 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2299 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2096 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2299 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 2096 stars left (next iteration limit 2305)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2096 robust_rms=11.848 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.571 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2096 robust_rms=0.388 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.400 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2096 robust_rms=0.298 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.359 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2096 robust_rms_before=1.033 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.268 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.298 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.307 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.359
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.307 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits N_match=2096 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.281 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.248 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.253 n_q1=502 n_q2=514 n_q3=559 n_q4=521 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.112
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits sigma_overall=0.363 worst_q_ratio=1.206
ref2=Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits sigma_overall=0.261 worst_q_ratio=1.327
new1=fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-50-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits sigma_overall=0.279 worst_q_ratio=1.147
new2=fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits sigma_overall=0.281 worst_q_ratio=1.112
reference average sigma_overall=0.312 worst_q_ratio=1.2665
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028_astrometric_residuals.png (3308 matched stars from wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086_astrometric_residuals.png (3908 matched stars from wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-50-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450_astrometric_residuals.png (2085 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-50-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451_astrometric_residuals.png (2096 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-50-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-50-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-50-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-11-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-11-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-50-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-50-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-50-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-50-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:46:40.180 -17:59:54.65 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-50-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-50-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:46:33.390 -18:01:39.44 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 01:46:40.180 -17:59:54.65
Second-epoch image center 01:46:33.390 -18:01:39.44
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0396 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:46:33.997 -18:02:01.21 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 01:46:40.180 -17:59:54.65
Second-epoch image center 01:46:33.997 -18:02:01.21
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0428 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 01:46:33.390 -18:01:39.44
Second-epoch second image center 01:46:33.997 -18:02:01.21
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00651 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FcMJGNV6ag
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits &> /tmp/tmp.AZPeAuArzd
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-50-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits &> /tmp/tmp.BlAv2ASAU8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-50-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits &> /tmp/tmp.GPHGqy5LNG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits and wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits and wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits and wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 21033 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 18.1142 to 35.1618 deg, Dec -23.2881 to -12.5807 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 18.1142 to 35.1618 deg, Dec -23.2881 to -12.5807 deg
Loaded 4142 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3196 out of 3400 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3400 out of 21033 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.737300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.737300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.91
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.83
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.83
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 21033 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 18.1142 to 35.1618 deg, Dec -23.2881 to -12.5807 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 18.1142 to 35.1618 deg, Dec -23.2881 to -12.5807 deg
Loaded 4142 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3196 out of 3400 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3400 out of 21033 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits (aperture=5.0)
Read 23371 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 18.3056 to 35.3091 deg, Dec -23.3269 to -12.4103 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 18.3056 to 35.3091 deg, Dec -23.3269 to -12.4103 deg
Loaded 4230 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3215 out of 3388 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3388 out of 23371 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits (aperture=4.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 38 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
2.0 pix Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits
2.6 pix fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-50-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
2.6 pix fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.8 mag. Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
15.1 mag. Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-50-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.9 (SNR ) 13.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.FcMJGNV6ag (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=795, bad_region=1, passed=21024
Got 21024 stars (including 20191 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 21024 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4871 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4867 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4867 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4867 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21024 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4871 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4867 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21024 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4867 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21024 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4867 stars left (next iteration limit 5353)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits N_match=4867 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.336 n_q1=1143 n_q2=1260 n_q3=1188 n_q4=1276 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.178
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits -region wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.AZPeAuArzd (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=721, bad_region=23, passed=23358
Got 23358 stars (including 22574 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23358 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4875 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4871 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23358 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4875 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23358 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23358 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 4871 stars left (next iteration limit 5358)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits N_match=4871 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.268 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.243 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.256 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.245 n_q1=1257 n_q2=1241 n_q3=1215 n_q4=1158 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.280
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits -region wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.BlAv2ASAU8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-50-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-50-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-50-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-50-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-50-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-50-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-50-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-50-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-50-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-50-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-50-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-50-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-50-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-50-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-50-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=1, blended=307, bad_region=6, passed=12295
Got 12295 stars (including 11965 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-50-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12295 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4859 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4859 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4859 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12295 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4865 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12295 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12295 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4860 stars left (next iteration limit 5344)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-50-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-50-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits N_match=4860 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.411 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.329 n_q1=1160 n_q2=1158 n_q3=1277 n_q4=1265 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.136
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-50-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-50-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-50-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-50-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-50-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.GPHGqy5LNG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=292, bad_region=8, passed=12224
Got 12224 stars (including 11910 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12224 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4863 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4861 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4861 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4861 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12224 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4862 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12224 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4862 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12224 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4862 stars left (next iteration limit 5347)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits N_match=4862 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.435 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.418 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.328 n_q1=1163 n_q2=1151 n_q3=1283 n_q4=1265 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.188
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-50-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-50-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/wcs_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-11-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_19-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0028.fits at 02:03:56.44 -17:32:15.3: 13.26 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-47-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0086.fits at 02:03:56.44 -17:32:15.3: 13.17 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.21 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:03:56.44 -17:32:15.3: ref_mag=13.21 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1360 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33572_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 33572_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 10.41057 | 2461262.91057 | 11.23 | 01:35:23.80 -15:33:26.3 | 3083 4578 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33579_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 33579_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 10.41057 | 2461262.91057 | 11.06 | 02:12:41.49 -20:42:36.1 | 8582 1727 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33582_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 33582_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 10.41057 | 2461262.91057 | 11.30 | 01:26:04.95 -21:18:47.7 | 2026 1004 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33613_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 33613_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 10.41057 | 2461262.91057 | 11.76 | 01:44:07.79 -13:31:48.9 | 4273 5886 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33623_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 33623_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 10.41057 | 2461262.91057 | 11.94 | 01:20:37.19 -20:18:35.3 | 1196 1536 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33624_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 33624_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 10.41057 | 2461262.91057 | 12.08 | 01:47:03.39 -20:51:12.7 | 4957 1504 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33628_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 33628_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 10.41057 | 2461262.91057 | 11.87 | 01:40:30.68 -14:58:09.7 | 3801 4983 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33633_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 33633_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 10.41057 | 2461262.91057 | 12.46 | 01:51:14.19 -14:23:46.2 | 5342 5422 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33654_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 33654_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 10.41057 | 2461262.91057 | 12.31 | 01:45:46.72 -12:57:33.3 | 4494 6247 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33656_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 33656_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 10.41057 | 2461262.91057 | 12.27 | 01:14:40.88 -22:29:25.5 | 0477 0121 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33658_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 33658_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 10.41057 | 2461262.91057 | 12.52 | 01:20:00.94 -19:29:12.3 | 1063 2025 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33659_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 33659_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 10.41057 | 2461262.91057 | 12.40 | 01:16:19.09 -14:52:30.9 | 0250 4763 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33690_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 33690_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 10.41057 | 2461262.91057 | 12.34 | 02:16:18.42 -22:04:23.2 | 9118 0903 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33693_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 33693_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 10.41057 | 2461262.91057 | 12.46 | 01:48:48.39 -15:11:26.0 | 5014 4923 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33698_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 33698_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 10.41057 | 2461262.91057 | 12.84 | 01:19:29.40 -18:40:34.2 | 0941 2507 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33754_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 33754_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 10.41057 | 2461262.91057 | 13.06 | 02:09:11.28 -17:15:21.5 | 8022 3807 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33762_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 33762_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 10.41057 | 2461262.91057 | 12.97 | 01:50:39.65 -14:08:43.9 | 5250 5569 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33769_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 33769_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 10.41057 | 2461262.91057 | 13.13 | 01:20:15.99 -13:50:33.3 | 0774 5442 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33775_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 33775_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 10.41057 | 2461262.91057 | 13.20 | 01:15:26.92 -15:40:39.5 | 0171 4264 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33786_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 33786_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 10.41057 | 2461262.91057 | 13.30 | 01:16:44.03 -15:21:13.9 | 0341 4478 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33804_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 33804_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 08 10.41007 | 2461262.91007 | 13.14 | 02:03:56.38 -17:32:14.8 | 7268 3608 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-50-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 10.41057 | 2461262.91057 | 13.14 | 02:03:56.50 -17:32:15.8 | 7267 3612 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33807_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 33807_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 10.41057 | 2461262.91057 | 13.68 | 01:38:35.89 -13:16:30.8 | 3451 5989 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33808_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 33808_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 10.41057 | 2461262.91057 | 13.43 | 01:32:54.26 -18:13:18.4 | 2845 2949 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33819_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 33819_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 10.41057 | 2461262.91057 | 13.38 | 01:36:26.76 -13:49:33.6 | 3159 5634 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33827_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 33827_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 10.41057 | 2461262.91057 | 13.26 | 01:37:23.57 -21:55:34.0 | 3644 0767 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33832_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 33832_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 10.41057 | 2461262.91057 | 13.30 | 01:53:59.52 -18:40:20.0 | 5868 2868 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33837_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 33837_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 10.41057 | 2461262.91057 | 13.65 | 01:18:33.89 -17:23:19.4 | 0732 3272 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33843_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 33843_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 10.41057 | 2461262.91057 | 13.13 | 02:09:53.34 -21:06:38.6 | 8188 1476 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33845_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 33845_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 10.41057 | 2461262.91057 | 13.39 | 02:16:45.92 -16:18:31.2 | 9120 4411 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33851_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 33851_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 10.41057 | 2461262.91057 | 13.31 | 01:14:45.68 -19:08:08.1 | 0284 2160 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33855_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 33855_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 10.41057 | 2461262.91057 | 13.59 | 02:15:42.03 -13:31:58.1 | 8934 6101 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33860_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 33860_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 10.41057 | 2461262.91057 | 13.71 | 01:17:15.57 -13:27:47.5 | 0303 5635 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33861_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 33861_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 10.41057 | 2461262.91057 | 13.58 | 02:16:44.97 -17:48:57.5 | 9133 3495 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33863_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 33863_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 10.41057 | 2461262.91057 | 13.58 | 01:22:50.25 -18:14:34.6 | 1400 2814 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33865_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 33865_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 10.41057 | 2461262.91057 | 13.82 | 01:23:58.34 -21:13:47.4 | 1723 1026 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33868_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 33868_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 10.41057 | 2461262.91057 | 13.77 | 01:54:43.32 -15:23:08.8 | 5879 4851 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33872_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 33872_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 10.41057 | 2461262.91057 | 13.70 | 02:11:02.28 -13:55:38.4 | 8243 5836 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04758_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 04758_fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 08 10.41057 | 2461262.91057 | 9.14 | 02:15:59.81 -20:31:09.8 | 9054 1850 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_045205_TTUQ1b1x1_1931194_xNc62qjs/fd_Cet-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-51-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits |
**** FOUND 02:15:59.80 -20:31:09.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-11-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
########### Completed Cet-11-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
###################################################################################
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461262.91007093 -observatory V36
08:12:07.49 +20:07:23.7 Mercury (-0.8mag)
12:10:26.80 -02:06:37.8 Venus (-4.4mag)
05:55:37.98 +23:39:12.0 Mars (1.3mag)
08:44:54.67 +18:33:57.1 Jupiter (-1.8mag)
00:56:15.01 +03:13:42.6 Saturn (0.6mag)
04:11:58.64 +20:57:35.6 Uranus (5.7mag)
00:15:58.24 +00:12:12.6 Neptune (7.7mag)
20:27:55.94 -23:31:01.0 Pluto (14.5mag)
07:13:21.62 +25:33:37.4 Moon (-8.9mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Aug 10 04:54 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461262.91007093:
08:44:50.23 +18:34:17.1 Io (6.0mag)
08:44:46.07 +18:34:35.8 Europa (6.3mag)
08:44:52.87 +18:34:03.0 Ganymede (5.6mag)
08:45:19.11 +18:32:13.9 Callisto (6.8mag)
08:42:26.32 +18:34:39.9 Himalia (15.7mag)
08:44:54.37 +18:33:58.9 Thebe (16.6mag)
08:41:59.70 +18:32:45.6 Elara (17.7mag)
08:49:02.44 +18:12:24.0 Pasiphae (17.9mag)
08:47:56.80 +18:44:42.4 Carme (19.0mag)
00:56:02.10 +03:13:39.7 Titan (8.4mag)
00:56:10.45 +03:13:49.7 Rhea (9.7mag)
00:56:30.35 +03:12:53.7 Iapetus (11.1mag)
00:56:05.42 +03:13:13.7 Hyperion (14.4mag)
00:55:34.63 +03:06:36.3 Phoebe (16.5mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Aug 10 04:54 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461262.91007093:
19:11:27.39 -21:51:38.3 JWST
10:55:24.10 +40:53:52.7 Chandra
11:21:05.72 -60:25:01.1 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Aug 10 04:54 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461262.91007093 -observatory V36
03:16:08.43 +17:33:35.1 17.6mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist)
18:01:12.75 -34:36:46.4 14.0mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
06:55:49.15 -68:58:58.2 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
06:10:23.69 +33:02:23.6 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
03:50:08.93 +38:35:49.8 16.9mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
22:36:49.65 +31:18:49.1 17.3mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
06:45:39.52 +26:30:12.5 16.8mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
10:23:35.68 +28:22:17.0 17.0mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
09:30:19.80 +05:18:22.5 17.9mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
15:12:50.70 -12:22:15.2 17.9mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
21:07:51.37 +65:46:01.2 17.9mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
15:45:41.94 -13:08:25.9 14.4mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
08:10:32.87 +31:26:42.7 15.3mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:06:37.20 +15:36:01.4 17.7mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
19:00:23.35 +43:12:08.9 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
21:07:29.08 +49:20:09.7 17.6mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS)
05:16:53.21 -12:56:38.6 15.4mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
06:57:38.93 +23:46:15.7 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
07:31:43.90 -16:26:43.4 17.8mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS)
10:35:56.86 +20:46:01.9 17.3mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
12:59:27.09 +02:12:16.2 17.0mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
16:02:50.52 +77:37:20.3 16.7mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
03:08:14.88 +46:13:46.7 17.1mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
11:48:35.87 +08:46:47.5 17.3mag A/2026 E1
22:00:43.41 -28:12:05.9 6.9mag 10P/Tempel
11:30:16.38 -03:32:03.1 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
04:41:56.36 +32:38:56.3 18.0mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson
11:12:09.24 +03:55:30.5 17.3mag 63P/Wild
00:54:03.73 -05:31:54.4 15.4mag 65P/Gunn
05:40:30.84 +20:39:32.1 13.7mag 78P/Gehrels
20:35:59.02 -23:46:33.3 17.7mag 84P/Giclas
03:02:51.96 +13:51:06.4 16.7mag 88P/Howell
08:01:29.03 +27:21:45.7 16.2mag 93P/Lovas
04:12:29.60 +17:43:24.3 17.5mag 112P/Urata-Niijima
06:03:43.37 +30:04:25.8 16.2mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
09:23:41.39 +26:16:40.2 15.0mag 123P/West-Hartley
11:48:05.65 -11:06:28.6 17.1mag 124P/Mrkos
05:39:47.21 +21:10:16.9 16.1mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
06:32:15.77 +18:47:38.5 17.9mag 131P/Mueller
00:03:01.00 +03:23:03.3 17.6mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma
03:19:24.16 -19:05:31.1 13.7mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
07:23:43.87 +37:54:48.2 15.9mag 162P/SidingSpring
14:29:21.29 +41:36:09.7 12.1mag 169P/NEAT
02:46:59.07 +09:32:30.9 17.6mag 220P/McNaught
16:42:45.04 -10:14:53.6 17.7mag 235P/LINEAR
20:20:58.20 -52:47:16.0 17.8mag 259P/Garradd
03:28:30.49 +26:05:30.4 15.3mag 260P/McNaught
07:11:59.10 +37:39:48.3 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR
15:11:11.80 +02:53:52.0 17.7mag 391P/Kowalski
09:02:53.20 +18:16:08.4 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.5K Aug 10 04:54 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08
22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17
14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02
12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61
16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09
01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97
21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13
18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06
12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98
13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38
18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63
14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36
20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83
18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86
03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12
18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16
04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02
18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73
17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01
14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46
10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67
14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11
10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58
19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5
02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86
23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47
02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78
18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29
13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72
17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66
11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3
23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15
20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53
19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88
11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82
19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31
17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67
19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52
18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92
19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91
19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81
04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96
13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01
16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07
10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63
14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62
13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09
00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13
11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56
21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14
17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72
14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53
20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4
15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57
23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64
17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15
00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20 AT2026ntk 2026-06-18.09 17.34
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93
23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83
02:02:26.67 +32:04:22.70 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.6 15.52
21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05
17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62
13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24
00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22
14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32
12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69
12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02
10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75
13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58
00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58
01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70 SN 2026obc 2026-06-7.43 15.15
21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90 ASASSN-26dr 2026-06-7.24 16.24
06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00 ASASSN-26ds 2026-06-2.97 15.02
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12
11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63
11:44:33.11 -68:48:32.90 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24.03 8.35
19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28
14:23:56.59 -58:37:47.40 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.59
11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86
00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34
15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44
11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55
13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96
02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37
17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8
16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8
09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63
21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9
14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21
14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89
12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5
13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23
09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51
15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.40 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.07 13.88
10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52
22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2
21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51
16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.15 15.93
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Aug 10 04:54 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2 PNV J00424164+4115162 2026-06-02.029 17.4mag
00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2 PNV J00423868+4115582 2026-06-05.1224 19.97Umag
19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7 PNV J19004295-4831017 2026-05-25.0752 14.2mag
09:55:21.28 +69:02:52.6 PNV J09552128+6902526 2026-06-13.933 18.9mag
19:51:21.42 +37:06:40.0 TCP J19512142+3706400 2026-06-17.2942 16.8mag
19:57:03.87 +37:41:46.4 TCP J19570387+3741464 2026-06-18.2638 17.5mag
00:42:32.04 +41:10:28.3 PNV J00423204+4110283 2026-06-26.059 16.6mag
02:19:17.36 +28:57:15.8 TCP J02191736+2857158 2026-07-12.3549 12.5mag
00:44:56.43 +41:57:41.6 PNV J00445643+4157416 2026-07-13.8026 17.98Cmag
00:42:55.36 +41:17:27.0 PNV J00425536+4117270 2026-07-20.1813 17.7mag
20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9 TCP J20354364+6131329 2026-07-20.5443 14.4mag
21:17:31.48 +22:25:51.0 TCP J21173148+2225510 2026-07-23.5577 14.8mag
00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8 PNV J00412404+4049028 2026-07-25.0157 18.7mag
00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6 PNV J00430426+4102286 2026-07-26.1512 20mag
14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0 TCP J14515140+6613240 2026-07-29.2561 13.5mag
00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2 PNV J00430615+4122082 2026-07-30.0085 19.4mag
00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2 PNV J00413323+4110122 2026-08-02.8913 17.1mag
05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-06.4109 11.2mag
22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8 TCP J22571796+4707418 2026-08-09.3289 14.3mag
09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1 PSN J09133817+7628181 2026-08-09.8037 15.4mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 190K Aug 10 04:54 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
13:39:15.220 +00:06:49.34 AT 2026whe 2026-06-09.63 21.79
18:23:56.902 +64:26:54.45 AT 2026whd 2026-07-03.22 20.6933
00:47:50.467 -12:27:20.17 AT 2026whc 2026-07-19.42 19.815
12:17:49.656 -30:16:45.76 AT 2026whb 2026-07-27.37 18.93
19:03:11.080 +34:21:18.37 AT 2026wha 2026-07-21.36 20.5677
15:02:41.202 -40:07:42.45 AT 2026wgz 2026-07-25.81 18.304
19:21:07.943 +43:53:03.37 AT 2026wgy 2026-07-23.41 18.625
02:21:34.482 -74:52:07.44 AT 2026wgx 2026-07-25.04 18.848
04:37:07.068 -62:47:36.38 AT 2026wgw 2026-07-25.10 18.938
00:33:43.233 -65:47:43.74 AT 2026wgv 2026-07-25.01 18.502
04:50:07.913 -58:03:54.94 AT 2026wgu 2026-07-25.10 19.077
00:12:08.725 +26:08:55.67 AT 2026wgt 2026-07-25.53 18.991
02:33:53.173 -32:54:04.43 AT 2026wgs 2026-07-26.16 19.224
13:02:32.070 -25:25:26.94 AT 2026wgr 2026-07-27.36 19.26
12:39:11.802 -30:15:31.31 AT 2026wgq 2026-07-27.36 19.66
13:46:27.172 -27:34:31.34 AT 2026wgp 2026-07-27.37 18.88
13:14:57.178 -26:39:33.67 AT 2026wgo 2026-07-27.37 19.1
13:27:05.151 -31:35:28.50 AT 2026wgn 2026-07-27.37 19.19
12:06:50.757 -36:16:06.67 SN 2026wgm 2026-07-27.38 19.48
18:51:49.362 +64:34:26.30 AT 2026wgl 2026-07-23.41 19.8497
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 87K Aug 10 04:54 tns_transients_list.txt