This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_040957_TTUQ1b1x1_477778_422CzHhM
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 10.3782 2461262.8782 7.87 01:51:46.49 +01:43:53.7
152.05166 -57.68822 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 4.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.4 Vesta -0 -1 1 7.6 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits at 01:51:46.49 +01:43:53.7: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits at 01:51:46.49 +01:43:53.7: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 10.3782* 01 51 46.49 +01 43 53.7 7.9 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461262.8782,7.87,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260810.3782 7.87CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 10.3782 2461262.8782 9.35 01:36:10.48 -00:06:10.0
146.44875 -60.91537 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 4.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.2 Pallas -0 -0 0 9.3 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits at 01:36:10.48 -00:06:10.0: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits at 01:36:10.48 -00:06:10.0: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 10.3782* 01 36 10.48 +00 06 10.0 9.3 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461262.8782,9.35,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260810.3782 9.35CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 10.3782 2461262.8782 12.78 02:11:30.60 -00:09:30.2
161.71744 -56.87463 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 4.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.505 Cava -1 -1 1 12.9 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits at 02:11:30.60 -00:09:30.2: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits at 02:11:30.60 -00:09:30.2: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 10.3782* 02 11 30.60 +00 09 30.2 12.8 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461262.8782,12.78,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260810.3782 12.78CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 10.3782 2461262.8782 13.47 02:07:34.43 +00:09:42.2
159.88250 -57.14412 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.0" and 4.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.360 Carlova -0 -1 1 13.3 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits at 02:07:34.43 +00:09:42.2: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits at 02:07:34.43 +00:09:42.2: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 10.3782* 02 07 34.43 +00 09 42.2 13.5 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461262.8782,13.47,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260810.3782 13.47CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 10.3782 2461262.8782 13.48 01:29:45.41 -04:04:23.4
146.24128 -65.19614 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 4.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.166 Rhodope -0 -0 0 13.7 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits at 01:29:45.41 -04:04:23.4: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits at 01:29:45.41 -04:04:23.4: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 10.3782* 01 29 45.41 -04 04 23.4 13.5 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461262.8782,13.48,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260810.3782 13.48CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 10.3782 2461262.8782 13.78 01:24:46.44 +02:54:11.0
139.21226 -58.91095 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 4.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.191 Kolga -1 -0 1 13.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits at 01:24:46.44 +02:54:11.0: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits at 01:24:46.44 +02:54:11.0: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461262.8782,13.78,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260810.3782 13.78CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.62882272 09.01.2026 03:05:20.283 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits
First image: 2461049.62882272 09.01.2026 03:05:20.283 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits
Last image: 2461262.87843021 10.08.2026 09:04:46.370 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_040957_TTUQ1b1x1_477778_422CzHhM/fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.66
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 5653
Objects passed selection criteria: 5641
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 4818.5
Average stars matched: 4709.25 (97.7327 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 232144 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Aug 6 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-190-gdf2934b0
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Aug 10 04:12:12 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.62882272 09.01.2026 03:05:20.283 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits
First image: 2461049.62882272 09.01.2026 03:05:20.283 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits
Last image: 2461262.87843021 10.08.2026 09:04:46.370 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_040957_TTUQ1b1x1_477778_422CzHhM/fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 110
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.41
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 9 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 30153
Objects passed selection criteria: 30089
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 25453.2
Average stars matched: 24736 (97.1821 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 253416 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Aug 6 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-190-gdf2934b0
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Aug 10 04:12:57 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_040957_TTUQ1b1x1_477778_422CzHhM/fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_040957_TTUQ1b1x1_477778_422CzHhM/fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_040957_TTUQ1b1x1_477778_422CzHhM/fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_040957_TTUQ1b1x1_477778_422CzHhM/fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461262.87791029
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits'
wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits'
wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits'
wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:43:00.023 -01:58:47.42 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:42:50.261 -01:55:55.54 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 01:43:00.023 -01:58:47.42
Second-epoch image center 01:42:50.261 -01:55:55.54
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0627 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:42:48.495 -01:55:49.36 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 01:43:00.023 -01:58:47.42
Second-epoch image center 01:42:48.495 -01:55:49.36
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0689 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 01:42:50.261 -01:55:55.54
Second-epoch second image center 01:42:48.495 -01:55:49.36
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00755 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7LGeWrW58s
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits &> /tmp/tmp.32ZwYhENwl
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_040957_TTUQ1b1x1_477778_422CzHhM/fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zVWKxihPDb
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_040957_TTUQ1b1x1_477778_422CzHhM/fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_040957_TTUQ1b1x1_477778_422CzHhM/fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits &> /tmp/tmp.f3xMJJDdzq
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_040957_TTUQ1b1x1_477778_422CzHhM/fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits and wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits and wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits and wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 5890 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 17.8513 to 33.6869 deg, Dec -7.2828 to +3.3396 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 17.8513 to 33.6869 deg, Dec -7.2828 to 3.3396 deg
Loaded 4101 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3360 out of 3515 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3515 out of 5890 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.897750
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.897750
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.66
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.24
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.24
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 5890 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 17.8513 to 33.6869 deg, Dec -7.2828 to +3.3396 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 17.8513 to 33.6869 deg, Dec -7.2828 to 3.3396 deg
Loaded 4101 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3360 out of 3515 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3515 out of 5890 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits (aperture=5.9)
Read 5840 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 17.8340 to 33.6849 deg, Dec -7.2949 to +3.3140 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 17.8340 to 33.6849 deg, Dec -7.2949 to 3.3140 deg
Loaded 4102 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3373 out of 3516 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3516 out of 5840 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits (aperture=5.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits
2.0 pix Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits
2.7 pix fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits
2.7 pix fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits
15.2 mag. Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.3 (SNR ) 11.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.7LGeWrW58s (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_040957_TTUQ1b1x1_477778_422CzHhM/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=428, bad_region=0, passed=5890
Got 5890 stars (including 5451 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5890 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4896 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5890 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5890 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5890 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4896 stars left (next iteration limit 5385)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits N_match=4896 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.292 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.284 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.264 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.261 n_q1=1255 n_q2=1225 n_q3=1248 n_q4=1168 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.293
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits -region wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.32ZwYhENwl (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_040957_TTUQ1b1x1_477778_422CzHhM/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=411, bad_region=0, passed=5840
Got 5840 stars (including 5424 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5840 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4895 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4891 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4891 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4891 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5840 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4895 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4891 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5840 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4891 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5840 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4891 stars left (next iteration limit 5380)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits N_match=4891 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.287 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.283 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.264 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.251 n_q1=1265 n_q2=1219 n_q3=1244 n_q4=1163 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.304
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits -region wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.zVWKxihPDb (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_040957_TTUQ1b1x1_477778_422CzHhM/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_040957_TTUQ1b1x1_477778_422CzHhM/fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_040957_TTUQ1b1x1_477778_422CzHhM/fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_040957_TTUQ1b1x1_477778_422CzHhM/fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_040957_TTUQ1b1x1_477778_422CzHhM/fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_040957_TTUQ1b1x1_477778_422CzHhM/fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_040957_TTUQ1b1x1_477778_422CzHhM/fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_040957_TTUQ1b1x1_477778_422CzHhM/fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=221, bad_region=1, passed=3825
Got 3825 stars (including 3601 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3825 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 412 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3519 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3515 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3515 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3515 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3825 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 412 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3520 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3515 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3825 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3515 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3825 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 3515 stars left (next iteration limit 3866)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3515 robust_rms=10.765 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.249 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3515 robust_rms=0.355 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.377 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3515 robust_rms=0.288 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.321 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3515 robust_rms_before=0.965 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.272 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.288 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.296 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.321
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.296 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits N_match=3515 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.280 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.269 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.255 n_q1=882 n_q2=860 n_q3=878 n_q4=895 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.088
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_040957_TTUQ1b1x1_477778_422CzHhM/fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.f3xMJJDdzq (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_040957_TTUQ1b1x1_477778_422CzHhM/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_040957_TTUQ1b1x1_477778_422CzHhM/fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_040957_TTUQ1b1x1_477778_422CzHhM/fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_040957_TTUQ1b1x1_477778_422CzHhM/fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_040957_TTUQ1b1x1_477778_422CzHhM/fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_040957_TTUQ1b1x1_477778_422CzHhM/fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_040957_TTUQ1b1x1_477778_422CzHhM/fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_040957_TTUQ1b1x1_477778_422CzHhM/fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=225, bad_region=1, passed=3840
Got 3840 stars (including 3611 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3840 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 412 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3532 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3527 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3527 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3527 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3840 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 412 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3533 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3527 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3840 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3527 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3840 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 3527 stars left (next iteration limit 3879)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3527 robust_rms=10.820 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.678 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3527 robust_rms=0.364 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.379 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3527 robust_rms=0.275 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.305 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3527 robust_rms_before=0.970 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.266 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.275 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.294 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.305
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.294 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits N_match=3527 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.273 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.292 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.254 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.249 n_q1=895 n_q2=852 n_q3=883 n_q4=897 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.114
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_040957_TTUQ1b1x1_477778_422CzHhM/fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits sigma_overall=0.292 worst_q_ratio=1.293
ref2=Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits sigma_overall=0.287 worst_q_ratio=1.304
new1=fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits sigma_overall=0.280 worst_q_ratio=1.088
new2=fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits sigma_overall=0.273 worst_q_ratio=1.114
reference average sigma_overall=0.2895 worst_q_ratio=1.2985
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077_astrometric_residuals.png (4896 matched stars from wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078_astrometric_residuals.png (4891 matched stars from wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402_astrometric_residuals.png (3515 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403_astrometric_residuals.png (3527 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_040957_TTUQ1b1x1_477778_422CzHhM/wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_040957_TTUQ1b1x1_477778_422CzHhM/wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits at 01:51:46.49 +01:43:53.7: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits at 01:36:10.48 -00:06:10.0: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits at 01:51:46.49 +01:43:53.7: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits at 01:36:10.48 -00:06:10.0: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20293.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20304.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 5s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20293_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
Preparing report for the candidate 20293_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20304_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
Preparing report for the candidate 20304_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 00199_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 00199_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:30:38.40 +02:52:51.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 7s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
01:51:46.49 +01:43:53.7
01:36:10.48 -00:06:10.0
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_040957_TTUQ1b1x1_477778_422CzHhM/fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_040957_TTUQ1b1x1_477778_422CzHhM/fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_040957_TTUQ1b1x1_477778_422CzHhM/fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_040957_TTUQ1b1x1_477778_422CzHhM/fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:43:00.023 -01:58:47.42 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:42:50.261 -01:55:55.54 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 01:43:00.023 -01:58:47.42
Second-epoch image center 01:42:50.261 -01:55:55.54
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0627 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:42:48.495 -01:55:49.36 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 01:43:00.023 -01:58:47.42
Second-epoch image center 01:42:48.495 -01:55:49.36
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0689 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 01:42:50.261 -01:55:55.54
Second-epoch second image center 01:42:48.495 -01:55:49.36
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00755 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uPlmf0Ofkk
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KLaPT0JSrV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_040957_TTUQ1b1x1_477778_422CzHhM/fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits &> /tmp/tmp.n9OcUnqfnW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_040957_TTUQ1b1x1_477778_422CzHhM/fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_040957_TTUQ1b1x1_477778_422CzHhM/fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wDzXmHZQCa
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_040957_TTUQ1b1x1_477778_422CzHhM/fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits and wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits and wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits and wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 31778 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 17.8476 to 33.6869 deg, Dec -7.2828 to +3.3396 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 17.8476 to 33.6869 deg, Dec -7.2828 to 3.3396 deg
Loaded 4102 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3266 out of 3563 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3563 out of 31778 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.795000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.795000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.41
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.39
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.39
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 31778 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 17.8476 to 33.6869 deg, Dec -7.2828 to +3.3396 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 17.8476 to 33.6869 deg, Dec -7.2828 to 3.3396 deg
Loaded 4102 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3266 out of 3563 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3563 out of 31778 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 31614 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 17.8341 to 33.6849 deg, Dec -7.2951 to +3.3303 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 17.8341 to 33.6849 deg, Dec -7.2951 to 3.3303 deg
Loaded 4106 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3278 out of 3571 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3571 out of 31614 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits (aperture=4.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 99 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits
1.9 pix Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits
2.5 pix fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits
2.5 pix fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits
15.4 mag. Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.5 (SNR ) 13.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.uPlmf0Ofkk (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_040957_TTUQ1b1x1_477778_422CzHhM/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=1245, bad_region=1, passed=31770
Got 31770 stars (including 30476 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31770 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4902 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4900 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31770 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31770 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31770 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4900 stars left (next iteration limit 5390)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits N_match=4900 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.289 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.284 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.265 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.253 n_q1=1275 n_q2=1207 n_q3=1258 n_q4=1160 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.262
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits -region wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.KLaPT0JSrV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_040957_TTUQ1b1x1_477778_422CzHhM/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=1210, bad_region=3, passed=31600
Got 31600 stars (including 30334 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31600 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4901 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31600 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31600 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31600 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4901 stars left (next iteration limit 5391)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits N_match=4901 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.284 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.284 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.260 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.255 n_q1=1283 n_q2=1199 n_q3=1263 n_q4=1156 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.247
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits -region wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.n9OcUnqfnW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_040957_TTUQ1b1x1_477778_422CzHhM/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_040957_TTUQ1b1x1_477778_422CzHhM/fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_040957_TTUQ1b1x1_477778_422CzHhM/fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_040957_TTUQ1b1x1_477778_422CzHhM/fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_040957_TTUQ1b1x1_477778_422CzHhM/fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_040957_TTUQ1b1x1_477778_422CzHhM/fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_040957_TTUQ1b1x1_477778_422CzHhM/fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_040957_TTUQ1b1x1_477778_422CzHhM/fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=630, bad_region=24, passed=19582
Got 19582 stars (including 18893 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 19582 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 412 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4881 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4877 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19582 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 412 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4882 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19582 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19582 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4877 stars left (next iteration limit 5364)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits N_match=4877 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.283 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.281 n_q1=1182 n_q2=1145 n_q3=1258 n_q4=1292 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.086
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_040957_TTUQ1b1x1_477778_422CzHhM/fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.wDzXmHZQCa (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_040957_TTUQ1b1x1_477778_422CzHhM/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_040957_TTUQ1b1x1_477778_422CzHhM/fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_040957_TTUQ1b1x1_477778_422CzHhM/fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_040957_TTUQ1b1x1_477778_422CzHhM/fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_040957_TTUQ1b1x1_477778_422CzHhM/fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_040957_TTUQ1b1x1_477778_422CzHhM/fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_040957_TTUQ1b1x1_477778_422CzHhM/fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_040957_TTUQ1b1x1_477778_422CzHhM/fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=563, bad_region=24, passed=19584
Got 19584 stars (including 18970 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 19584 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 412 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4882 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4876 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19584 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 412 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4883 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19584 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19584 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4876 stars left (next iteration limit 5363)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits N_match=4876 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.288 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.275 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.268 n_q1=1182 n_q2=1147 n_q3=1258 n_q4=1289 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.074
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_040957_TTUQ1b1x1_477778_422CzHhM/fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_040957_TTUQ1b1x1_477778_422CzHhM/wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0402.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_040957_TTUQ1b1x1_477778_422CzHhM/wcs_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits at 02:11:30.60 -00:09:30.2: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits at 02:07:34.43 +00:09:42.2: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits at 01:29:45.41 -04:04:23.4: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits at 02:11:30.60 -00:09:30.2: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-05-20_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0077.fits at 01:24:46.44 +02:54:11.0: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits at 02:07:34.43 +00:09:42.2: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits at 01:29:45.41 -04:04:23.4: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_21-06-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0078.fits at 01:24:46.44 +02:54:11.0: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52249.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52386.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52389.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52425.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51976_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 51976_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:51:46.49 +01:43:53.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51987_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 51987_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:36:10.49 -00:06:09.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52057_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 52057_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52059_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 52059_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52083_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 52083_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52096_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 52096_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52104_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 52104_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52143_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 52143_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52145_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 52145_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52153_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 52153_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52157_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 52157_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52217_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 52217_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52236_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 52236_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52249_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
Preparing report for the candidate 52249_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52252_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 52252_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52253_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 52253_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52270_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 52270_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52274_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 52274_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52275_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 52275_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52279_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 52279_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52284_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 52284_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52287_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 52287_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52306_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 52306_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52315_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 52315_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52318_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 52318_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52328_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 52328_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52332_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 52332_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52333_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 52333_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52334_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 52334_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52351_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 52351_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52353_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 52353_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52357_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 52357_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52373_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 52373_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52374_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 52374_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:30:27.25 +02:57:23.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52378_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 52378_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52386_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
Preparing report for the candidate 52386_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52389_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
Preparing report for the candidate 52389_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52391_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 52391_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52393_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 52393_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52400_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 52400_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52420_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 52420_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52425_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
Preparing report for the candidate 52425_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52428_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 52428_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52431_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 52431_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52434_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 52434_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52446_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 52446_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52452_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 52452_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52463_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 52463_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52464_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 52464_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52468_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 52468_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52490_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 52490_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52503_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 52503_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52505_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 52505_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52514_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 52514_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52515_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 52515_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52522_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 52522_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52531_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 52531_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:32:56.12 +00:06:02.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52533_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 52533_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52537_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 52537_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52538_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 52538_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52540_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 52540_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52551_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 52551_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52553_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 52553_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52559_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 52559_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52565_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 52565_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52590_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 52590_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52601_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 52601_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52619_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 52619_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52652_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 52652_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52655_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 52655_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52673_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 52673_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52688_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 52688_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52693_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 52693_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52696_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 52696_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52700_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 52700_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52709_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 52709_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52710_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 52710_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52711_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 52711_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52715_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 52715_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52716_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 52716_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52721_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 52721_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52722_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 52722_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52731_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 52731_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52736_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 52736_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52741_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 52741_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52743_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 52743_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52747_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 52747_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52749_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 52749_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52755_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 52755_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52756_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 52756_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52757_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 52757_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52763_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 52763_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52765_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 52765_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52768_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 52768_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52769_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 52769_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52772_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 52772_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04959_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 04959_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:40:18.01 +01:39:53.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 00584_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 00584_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:30:38.40 +02:52:51.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24417_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 24417_fd_Cet-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_04-04-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
