NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields Cam-02-Q1b1x1

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 0

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field Cam-02-Q1b1x1 reference image: Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
Field Cam-02-Q1b1x1 reference image: Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
Field Cam-02-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
Field Cam-02-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Cam-02-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Cam-02-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Cam-02-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 944106 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 944106 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.png' -> 'transient_report/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits_preview.png'
Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits

renamed 'Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.png' -> 'transient_report/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits_preview.png'
Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1670.6963 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 554.5807 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1154.5271 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 455.7432 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1153.7237 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 456.2147 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 0.691045 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.001 INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits Header: 67 keys total, 4 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-10T01:40:29.4877130' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-10T06:40:29.4877130' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61262.2781190625 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-10T06:40:39.3893104' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61262.2782336688 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 179.99643111563 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 85.0000056457421 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 29.9363888888889 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 355.929722222222 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.99807436229449 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cam-02' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '12 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+85 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29507 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29507 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 56: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 57: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 58: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 59: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 60: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 61: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 62: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 63: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 64: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/d_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits :) Spent 0.821942 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/d_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 26658.571233 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=17308.5, right_median=19900.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits Header: 67 keys total, 4 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-10T01:41:31.4990810' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-10T06:41:31.4990810' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61262.2788367942 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-10T06:41:41.4004667' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61262.2789513888 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 179.996431444666 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 85.0000057172955 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 29.9211111111111 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 355.95 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.99899277367892 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cam-02' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '12 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+85 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29507 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29507 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 56: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 57: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 58: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 59: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 60: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 61: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 62: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 63: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 64: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/d_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits :) Spent 0.760760 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/d_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 26658.571233 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=17308.5, right_median=19900.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits


fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461262.77823480 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits' wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits' wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits' wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits' ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits Image size: 937.5'x624.4' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 11:59:44.593 +84:59:49.94 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits Image size: 941.5'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 12:00:43.367 +85:00:55.21 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 11:59:44.593 +84:59:49.94 Second-epoch image center 12:00:43.367 +85:00:55.21 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0280 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits Image size: 941.5'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 12:00:46.699 +85:01:26.25 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 11:59:44.593 +84:59:49.94 Second-epoch image center 12:00:46.699 +85:01:26.25 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0350 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 12:00:43.367 +85:00:55.21 Second-epoch second image center 12:00:46.699 +85:01:26.25 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00871 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KkAf2V3XGT Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2hdOG6UaeJ Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JgmdMLRvYW Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Jk6kCKiqf3 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits and wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits and wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits and wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 6849 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 25.4445 to 319.1944 deg, Dec +77.2225 to +89.8322 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 25.4445 to 319.1944 deg, Dec 77.2225 to 89.8322 deg Loaded 21381 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5420 out of 5647 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5647 out of 6849 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.853150 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.853150 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.21 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.64 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.64
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 6849 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 25.4445 to 319.1944 deg, Dec +77.2225 to +89.8322 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 25.4445 to 319.1944 deg, Dec 77.2225 to 89.8322 deg Loaded 21381 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5420 out of 5647 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5647 out of 6849 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits (aperture=6.5) Read 8333 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 25.4452 to 324.7233 deg, Dec +76.9983 to +89.8805 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 25.4452 to 324.7233 deg, Dec 76.9983 to 89.8805 deg Loaded 22550 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5987 out of 6211 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 6211 out of 8333 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits (aperture=5.8) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.4 pix Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits 2.1 pix Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits 2.1 pix fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits 2.1 pix fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 14.6 mag. Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits 15.0 mag. Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits 14.6 mag. fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits 14.5 mag. fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.5 (SNR ) 11.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.KkAf2V3XGT (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=534, bad_region=0, passed=6849 Got 6849 stars (including 6309 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6849 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0234 through 0 to 179.9707, gap 179.9707 to 180.0234 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 836 to 900 (Dec 77.2 to 89.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4923 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4919 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6849 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0231 through 0 to 179.9708, gap 179.9708 to 180.0231 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 836 to 900 (Dec 77.2 to 89.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4922 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6849 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6849 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Excluding outliers - 4918 stars left (next iteration limit 5410) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits N_match=4918 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.431 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.518 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.421 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.445 n_q1=1252 n_q2=1201 n_q3=1260 n_q4=1205 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.202 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits -region wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.2hdOG6UaeJ (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=512, bad_region=0, passed=8333 Got 8333 stars (including 7805 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8333 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0230 through 0 to 179.9701, gap 179.9701 to 180.0230 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 834 to 900 (Dec 77.0 to 89.9) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4925 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4923 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8333 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0206 through 0 to 179.9702, gap 179.9702 to 180.0206 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 834 to 900 (Dec 77.0 to 89.9) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4925 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8333 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8333 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Excluding outliers - 4923 stars left (next iteration limit 5415) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits N_match=4923 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.285 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.299 n_q1=1253 n_q2=1281 n_q3=1183 n_q4=1206 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.090 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits -region wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.JgmdMLRvYW (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=359, bad_region=0, passed=6471 Got 6471 stars (including 6094 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6471 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0269 through 0 to 179.9712, gap 179.9712 to 180.0269 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.0 to 89.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4922 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4917 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6471 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0250 through 0 to 179.9703, gap 179.9703 to 180.0250 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.0 to 89.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4920 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6471 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6471 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Excluding outliers - 4916 stars left (next iteration limit 5408) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4916 robust_rms=11.047 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.049 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4916 robust_rms=0.435 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.452 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4916 robust_rms=0.288 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.314 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4916 robust_rms_before=0.809 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.292 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.288 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.320 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.314 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.320 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits N_match=4916 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.270 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.287 n_q1=1295 n_q2=1309 n_q3=1173 n_q4=1139 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.057 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.Jk6kCKiqf3 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=352, bad_region=0, passed=6550 Got 6550 stars (including 6186 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6550 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0251 through 0 to 179.9711, gap 179.9711 to 180.0251 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.0 to 89.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4919 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6550 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0224 through 0 to 179.9707, gap 179.9707 to 180.0224 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.0 to 89.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4922 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6550 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6550 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Excluding outliers - 4918 stars left (next iteration limit 5410) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4918 robust_rms=11.194 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.030 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4918 robust_rms=0.409 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.421 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4918 robust_rms=0.288 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.307 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4918 robust_rms_before=0.803 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.285 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.288 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.319 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.307 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.319 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits N_match=4918 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.284 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.278 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.306 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.254 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.271 n_q1=1288 n_q2=1315 n_q3=1171 n_q4=1144 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.075 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits sigma_overall=0.431 worst_q_ratio=1.202 ref2=Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits sigma_overall=0.317 worst_q_ratio=1.090 new1=fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits sigma_overall=0.304 worst_q_ratio=1.057 new2=fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits sigma_overall=0.284 worst_q_ratio=1.075 reference average sigma_overall=0.374 worst_q_ratio=1.146 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101_astrometric_residuals.png (4918 matched stars from wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246_astrometric_residuals.png (4923 matched stars from wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0254_astrometric_residuals.png (4916 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255_astrometric_residuals.png (4918 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 No candidates found here Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits Image size: 937.5'x624.4' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 11:59:44.593 +84:59:49.94 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits Image size: 941.5'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 12:00:43.367 +85:00:55.21 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 11:59:44.593 +84:59:49.94 Second-epoch image center 12:00:43.367 +85:00:55.21 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0280 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits Image size: 941.5'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 12:00:46.699 +85:01:26.25 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 11:59:44.593 +84:59:49.94 Second-epoch image center 12:00:46.699 +85:01:26.25 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0350 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 12:00:43.367 +85:00:55.21 Second-epoch second image center 12:00:46.699 +85:01:26.25 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00871 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits &> /tmp/tmp.n2NIk8j0Ct Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits &> /tmp/tmp.eDjyytIW0H Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WNKDYtU3hT Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rYivqd9kIh Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits and wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits and wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits and wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 41325 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 13.9256 to 354.3787 deg, Dec +77.0878 to +89.9623 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 13.9256 to 354.3787 deg, Dec 77.0878 to 89.9623 deg Loaded 25682 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6015 out of 6573 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 6573 out of 41325 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.702900 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.702900 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.90 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.80 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.80
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 41325 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 13.9256 to 354.3787 deg, Dec +77.0878 to +89.9623 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 13.9256 to 354.3787 deg, Dec 77.0878 to 89.9623 deg Loaded 25682 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6015 out of 6573 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 6573 out of 41325 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits (aperture=4.9) Read 52763 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 7.1598 to 354.2235 deg, Dec +76.9098 to +89.9629 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 7.1598 to 354.2235 deg, Dec 76.9098 to 89.9629 deg Loaded 27007 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6012 out of 6623 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 6623 out of 52763 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits (aperture=4.6) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 48 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.2 pix Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits 2.1 pix Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits 2.0 pix fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits 2.1 pix fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 14.8 mag. Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits 15.1 mag. Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits 14.7 mag. fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits 14.7 mag. fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 14.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.n2NIk8j0Ct (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=1852, bad_region=0, passed=41308 Got 41308 stars (including 39383 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 41308 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0064 through 0 to 179.9931, gap 179.9931 to 180.0064 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.1 to 90.0) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4933 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41308 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0070 through 0 to 179.9935, gap 179.9935 to 180.0070 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.1 to 90.0) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41308 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41308 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Excluding outliers - 4933 stars left (next iteration limit 5426) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits N_match=4933 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.424 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.495 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.439 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.431 n_q1=1251 n_q2=1229 n_q3=1216 n_q4=1237 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.166 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits -region wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.eDjyytIW0H (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=2240, bad_region=19, passed=52747 Got 52747 stars (including 50384 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 52747 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0011 through 0 to 179.9997, gap 179.9997 to 180.0011 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 834 to 900 (Dec 76.9 to 90.0) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4927 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52747 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0012 through 0 to 179.9985, gap 179.9985 to 180.0012 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 834 to 900 (Dec 76.9 to 90.0) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52747 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52747 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Excluding outliers - 4927 stars left (next iteration limit 5419) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits N_match=4927 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.308 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.308 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.277 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.286 n_q1=1242 n_q2=1292 n_q3=1186 n_q4=1207 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.134 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits -region wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.WNKDYtU3hT (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=1522, bad_region=30, passed=41995 Got 41995 stars (including 40355 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 41995 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0012 through 0 to 179.9936, gap 179.9936 to 180.0012 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 834 to 900 (Dec 77.0 to 90.0) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4921 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41995 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0233 through 0 to 179.9955, gap 179.9955 to 180.0233 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 834 to 900 (Dec 77.0 to 90.0) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4923 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41995 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41995 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Excluding outliers - 4921 stars left (next iteration limit 5413) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits N_match=4921 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.293 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.291 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.260 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.278 n_q1=1303 n_q2=1323 n_q3=1156 n_q4=1139 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.071 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.rYivqd9kIh (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=1477, bad_region=31, passed=41700 Got 41700 stars (including 40105 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 41700 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0036 through 0 to 179.9930, gap 179.9930 to 180.0036 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 834 to 900 (Dec 77.0 to 90.0) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4924 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41700 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0211 through 0 to 179.9974, gap 179.9974 to 180.0211 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 834 to 900 (Dec 77.0 to 90.0) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4925 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41700 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41700 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Excluding outliers - 4924 stars left (next iteration limit 5416) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits N_match=4924 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.281 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.306 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.248 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.269 n_q1=1284 n_q2=1329 n_q3=1166 n_q4=1145 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.090 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/wcs_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits at 07:57:54.61 +85:11:11.3: 13.66 +/- 0.09 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits at 08:07:23.88 +84:09:38.5: 13.60 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits at 17:44:38.42 +83:29:13.6: 13.53 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits at 14:29:56.94 +86:08:34.8: 13.07 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits at 12:11:27.29 +81:25:46.7: 12.89 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits at 17:44:38.42 +83:29:13.6: 13.43 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits at 07:57:54.61 +85:11:11.3: 13.59 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits at 08:07:23.88 +84:09:38.5: 13.44 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.61 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:44:38.42 +83:29:13.6: ref_mag=13.46 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5592 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:57:54.61 +85:11:11.3: ref_mag=13.61 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.5192 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:07:23.88 +84:09:38.5: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7980 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits at 14:29:56.94 +86:08:34.8: 13.26 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.18 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:29:56.94 +86:08:34.8: ref_mag=13.18 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2536 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits at 12:11:27.29 +81:25:46.7: 13.10 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.01 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:11:27.29 +81:25:46.7: ref_mag=13.01 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0842 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits at 15:32:54.55 +80:25:39.4: 14.18 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits at 07:05:19.38 +82:50:31.7: 14.04 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-58-44_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits at 14:25:15.15 +82:56:15.7: 14.43 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits at 15:32:54.55 +80:25:39.4: 14.50 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.34 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:32:54.55 +80:25:39.4: ref_mag=14.34 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.1789 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits at 07:05:19.38 +82:50:31.7: 14.87 +/- 0.20 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.30 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:19.38 +82:50:31.7: ref_mag=14.30 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3588 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits at 14:25:15.15 +82:56:15.7: 14.60 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.53 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:25:15.15 +82:56:15.7: ref_mag=14.53 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.2591 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90) make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 63284_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 The candidate 63284_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 10.27895    2461262.77895    14.49    11:22:34.49 +82:29:02.0   5438 4708   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits **** FOUND 11:22:33.90 +82:29:01.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 63294_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 The candidate 63294_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 10.27895    2461262.77895    13.89    14:39:18.43 +81:44:56.2   1567 3824   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits **** FOUND 14:39:18.32 +81:44:54.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 63302_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 The candidate 63302_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 10.27895    2461262.77895    14.08    17:37:45.25 +85:23:44.8   2202 0292   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits **** FOUND 17:37:45.29 +85:23:45.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 63304_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 The candidate 63304_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 10.27823    2461262.77823    13.77    08:07:23.88 +84:09:38.0   7860 2244   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 10.27895    2461262.77895    13.83    08:07:23.89 +84:09:39.0   7860 2249   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 63308_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 The candidate 63308_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 10.27823    2461262.77823    13.55    07:57:55.14 +85:11:11.6   7423 1784   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 10.27895    2461262.77895    13.49    07:57:54.09 +85:11:11.0   7423 1789   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 63311_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 The candidate 63311_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 10.27823    2461262.77823    13.56    17:44:38.48 +83:29:13.8   1033 0204   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 10.27895    2461262.77895    13.56    17:44:38.36 +83:29:13.4   1032 0210   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 63326_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 The candidate 63326_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 10.27895    2461262.77895    11.54    07:12:36.19 +84:18:30.3   8188 1476   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 63340_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 The candidate 63340_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 10.27895    2461262.77895    12.42    09:04:59.22 +82:11:43.6   8022 3807   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 63345_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 The candidate 63345_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 10.27895    2461262.77895    12.73    05:44:58.18 +82:49:11.7   9367 0177   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 63356_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 The candidate 63356_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 10.27895    2461262.77895    12.83    08:09:41.55 +81:42:13.5   9049 3157   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits **** FOUND 08:09:41.62 +81:42:13.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 63361_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 The candidate 63361_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 10.27895    2461262.77895    12.93    08:47:31.88 +80:15:26.7   9120 4411   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 63371_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 The candidate 63371_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 10.27895    2461262.77895    13.06    08:19:21.43 +81:15:20.0   9133 3495   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 63372_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 The candidate 63372_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 10.27823    2461262.77823    13.25    14:29:57.04 +86:08:34.8   3462 1952   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 10.27895    2461262.77895    13.26    14:29:56.84 +86:08:34.9   3462 1957   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 63377_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 The candidate 63377_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 10.27895    2461262.77895    12.93    09:30:14.23 +78:17:23.8   8934 6101   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 63382_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 The candidate 63382_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 10.27823    2461262.77823    13.16    12:11:27.17 +81:25:46.0   4405 5329   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 10.27895    2461262.77895    13.03    12:11:27.41 +81:25:47.4   4405 5335   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 63383_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 The candidate 63383_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 10.27895    2461262.77895    13.28    07:40:10.53 +85:21:15.9   7451 1547   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 63387_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 The candidate 63387_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 10.27895    2461262.77895    13.14    09:13:36.60 +81:26:30.8   8165 4279   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 63394_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 The candidate 63394_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 10.27895    2461262.77895    13.37    07:30:43.72 +84:20:44.7   8054 1715   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 63397_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 The candidate 63397_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 10.27895    2461262.77895    13.38    07:32:57.70 +82:17:10.0   9160 2311   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 63399_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 The candidate 63399_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 10.27895    2461262.77895    13.21    09:45:15.87 +79:14:27.4   8243 5837   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 63404_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 The candidate 63404_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 10.27895    2461262.77895    13.80    05:51:29.71 +83:11:42.1   9132 0297   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 63407_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 The candidate 63407_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 10.27895    2461262.77895    13.36    09:21:35.05 +78:12:34.8   9185 5990   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 63408_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 The candidate 63408_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 10.27895    2461262.77895    13.29    08:39:52.12 +80:39:39.0   9081 4101   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 63415_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 The candidate 63415_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 10.27895    2461262.77895    13.51    10:04:06.36 +83:37:52.7   6628 3673   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits **** FOUND 10:04:06.92 +83:37:52.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 63424_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 The candidate 63424_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 10.27895    2461262.77895    13.64    06:52:24.73 +84:17:24.9   8302 1192   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 63431_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 The candidate 63431_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 10.27895    2461262.77895    13.72    09:20:28.38 +84:54:03.9   6804 2683   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 63439_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 The candidate 63439_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 10.27895    2461262.77895    14.02    07:42:27.17 +84:50:18.8   7710 1724   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 63445_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 The candidate 63445_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 10.27895    2461262.77895    13.72    09:32:32.93 +84:58:15.5   6647 2740   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits **** FOUND 09:32:31.92 +84:58:15.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 63447_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 The candidate 63447_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 10.27895    2461262.77895    13.78    06:45:07.13 +85:17:51.6   7740 0929   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 63453_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 The candidate 63453_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 10.27895    2461262.77895    13.97    14:18:55.61 +80:39:16.8   1490 4634   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits **** FOUND 14:18:55.67 +80:39:16.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 63454_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 The candidate 63454_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 10.27895    2461262.77895    13.32    09:19:13.02 +77:55:04.7   9353 6092   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 63456_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 The candidate 63456_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 10.27895    2461262.77895    13.63    09:04:11.12 +81:50:55.9   8171 3957   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 63462_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 The candidate 63462_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 10.27895    2461262.77895    13.76    08:37:26.62 +81:10:31.7   8892 3843   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 63467_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 The candidate 63467_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 10.27895    2461262.77895    13.74    08:14:39.63 +81:26:38.0   9109 3340   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 63474_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 The candidate 63474_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 10.27895    2461262.77895    14.22    09:08:50.41 +82:54:45.0   7686 3520   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 63478_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 The candidate 63478_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 10.27895    2461262.77895    14.10    09:40:46.33 +82:01:05.1   7477 4324   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 63492_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 The candidate 63492_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 10.27895    2461262.77895    13.88    09:11:00.50 +81:49:58.8   8063 4057   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 63503_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 The candidate 63503_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 10.27823    2461262.77823    14.31    07:05:19.47 +82:50:32.1   9070 1673   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 10.27895    2461262.77895    14.50    07:05:19.30 +82:50:31.2   9071 1678   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 63504_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 The candidate 63504_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 10.27823    2461262.77823    14.20    15:32:54.72 +80:25:39.7   0133 3372   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 10.27895    2461262.77895    14.16    15:32:54.38 +80:25:39.0   0134 3379   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 63508_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 The candidate 63508_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 10.27895    2461262.77895    14.31    07:16:37.42 +85:51:23.1   7298 1169   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 63514_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 The candidate 63514_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 10.27895    2461262.77895    13.77    09:04:33.93 +81:40:29.9   8233 4043   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 63532_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 The candidate 63532_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 10.27895    2461262.77895    14.03    10:03:25.82 +82:05:13.9   7039 4510   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 63537_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 The candidate 63537_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 10.27895    2461262.77895    14.12    09:41:13.42 +79:56:28.0   8121 5412   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 63538_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 The candidate 63538_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 10.27823    2461262.77823    14.26    14:25:14.94 +82:56:15.8   2258 3467   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-40-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0254.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 10.27895    2461262.77895    14.26    14:25:15.36 +82:56:15.5   2258 3473   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 63540_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 The candidate 63540_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 10.27895    2461262.77895    14.31    14:51:07.83 +79:02:52.7   0185 4785   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits **** FOUND 14:51:07.83 +79:02:54.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 63559_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 The candidate 63559_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 10.27895    2461262.77895    13.87    08:58:00.65 +79:23:14.1   9278 4992   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 63585_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 The candidate 63585_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 10.27895    2461262.77895    14.28    10:05:02.37 +80:33:53.0   7400 5361   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 22056_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 The candidate 22056_fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 10.27895    2461262.77895    13.37    14:17:43.95 +84:13:19.2   2845 2949   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_014354_TTUQ1b1x1_2919046_LlKBKFk6/fd_Cam-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-41-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (33.9") between the two second-epoch detections make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### ########### Completed Cam-02-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### ################################################################################### renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461262.77823480 -observatory V36 08:11:12.30 +20:08:31.1 Mercury (-0.8mag) 12:09:58.82 -02:02:47.3 Venus (-4.4mag) 05:55:14.95 +23:39:01.8 Mars (1.3mag) 08:44:47.50 +18:34:23.7 Jupiter (-1.8mag) 00:56:15.71 +03:13:49.0 Saturn (0.6mag) 04:11:57.77 +20:57:33.3 Uranus (5.7mag) 00:15:58.73 +00:12:16.1 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:27:56.71 -23:30:58.0 Pluto (14.5mag) 07:03:00.09 +25:40:59.4 Moon (-8.9mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Aug 10 01:46 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461262.77823480: 08:44:44.67 +18:34:36.1 Io (6.0mag) 08:44:39.13 +18:35:01.3 Europa (6.3mag) 08:44:47.51 +18:34:21.5 Ganymede (5.6mag) 08:45:11.16 +18:32:44.0 Callisto (6.8mag) 08:42:19.27 +18:35:01.6 Himalia (15.7mag) 08:44:45.63 +18:34:32.6 Thebe (16.6mag) 08:41:52.57 +18:33:08.8 Elara (17.7mag) 08:48:55.24 +18:12:54.1 Pasiphae (17.9mag) 08:47:50.17 +18:45:07.2 Carme (19.0mag) 00:56:02.68 +03:13:47.7 Titan (8.4mag) 00:56:11.92 +03:13:57.0 Rhea (9.7mag) 00:56:30.70 +03:12:58.4 Iapetus (11.1mag) 00:56:05.68 +03:13:21.2 Hyperion (14.4mag) 00:55:35.50 +03:06:43.7 Phoebe (16.5mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Aug 10 01:46 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461262.77823480: 19:11:21.59 -21:58:44.7 JWST 07:01:04.78 -28:38:59.5 Chandra 09:58:33.81 -55:54:38.0 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Aug 10 01:46 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461262.77823480 -observatory V36 03:15:59.73 +17:32:55.7 17.6mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 18:01:14.72 -34:36:51.2 14.0mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 06:55:41.80 -68:58:39.6 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:10:21.64 +33:02:13.2 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 03:49:46.45 +38:32:27.9 16.9mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 22:36:56.31 +31:19:19.8 17.3mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 06:45:31.69 +26:30:20.5 16.8mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 10:23:28.28 +28:22:38.2 17.0mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 09:30:14.44 +05:18:21.7 17.9mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 15:12:49.23 -12:21:56.5 17.9mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS) 21:08:01.86 +65:46:58.1 17.9mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon) 15:45:49.37 -13:07:42.2 14.4mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 08:10:24.00 +31:26:20.6 15.3mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:06:38.28 +15:36:04.0 17.7mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 19:00:33.21 +43:11:46.8 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 21:07:40.99 +49:19:44.6 17.6mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS) 05:16:46.95 -12:56:43.0 15.4mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 06:57:33.84 +23:47:39.4 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 07:31:40.61 -16:25:35.7 17.8mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS) 10:35:45.64 +20:46:32.5 17.3mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 12:59:22.16 +02:12:48.3 17.0mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 16:02:50.32 +77:38:09.6 16.7mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 03:08:12.49 +46:13:37.0 17.1mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 11:48:29.18 +08:45:58.4 17.3mag A/2026 E1 22:00:36.02 -28:08:55.7 6.9mag 10P/Tempel 11:30:11.54 -03:31:33.3 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 04:41:46.73 +32:38:11.9 18.0mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson 11:11:52.98 +03:58:06.0 17.3mag 63P/Wild 00:54:04.59 -05:31:35.4 15.4mag 65P/Gunn 05:40:12.94 +20:39:41.5 13.7mag 78P/Gehrels 20:36:06.45 -23:45:40.5 17.7mag 84P/Giclas 03:02:44.65 +13:50:32.4 16.7mag 88P/Howell 08:01:08.91 +27:22:51.1 16.2mag 93P/Lovas 04:12:07.16 +17:40:18.0 17.5mag 112P/Urata-Niijima 06:03:17.19 +30:05:19.7 16.2mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 09:23:22.54 +26:18:01.9 15.0mag 123P/West-Hartley 11:47:49.60 -11:03:27.2 17.1mag 124P/Mrkos 05:39:35.58 +21:10:19.0 16.1mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 06:32:02.27 +18:48:02.1 17.9mag 131P/Mueller 00:03:02.65 +03:23:09.4 17.6mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma 03:19:27.69 -19:05:49.8 13.7mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 07:23:16.56 +37:54:26.4 15.9mag 162P/SidingSpring 14:32:03.75 +41:35:44.0 12.1mag 169P/NEAT 02:46:45.13 +09:32:26.1 17.6mag 220P/McNaught 16:42:40.64 -10:14:19.3 17.7mag 235P/LINEAR 20:21:03.59 -52:47:34.2 17.8mag 259P/Garradd 03:28:07.48 +26:02:10.3 15.3mag 260P/McNaught 07:11:35.19 +37:40:00.9 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR 15:11:09.02 +02:54:44.7 17.7mag 391P/Kowalski 09:02:45.92 +18:16:31.7 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.5K Aug 10 01:46 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08 22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17 14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02 12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61 16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09 01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97 21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13 18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06 12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98 13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38 18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63 14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15 20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53 19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82 19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31 17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67 19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52 18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92 19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91 19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81 04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96 13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01 16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07 10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63 14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62 13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09 00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13 11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56 21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14 17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72 14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53 20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4 15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57 23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64 17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15 00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20 AT2026ntk 2026-06-18.09 17.34 20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93 23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83 02:02:26.67 +32:04:22.70 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.6 15.52 21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05 17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62 13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24 00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22 14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32 12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69 12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02 10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75 13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58 00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58 01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70 SN 2026obc 2026-06-7.43 15.15 21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90 ASASSN-26dr 2026-06-7.24 16.24 06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00 ASASSN-26ds 2026-06-2.97 15.02 20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12 11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63 11:44:33.11 -68:48:32.90 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24.03 8.35 19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28 14:23:56.59 -58:37:47.40 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.59 11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46 21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86 00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34 15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44 11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55 13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96 02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37 17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7 01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8 16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8 09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63 21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9 14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21 14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89 12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5 13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23 09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51 15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.40 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.07 13.88 10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52 22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2 21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51 16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.15 15.93 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Aug 10 01:46 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2 PNV J00424164+4115162 2026-06-02.029 17.4mag 00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2 PNV J00423868+4115582 2026-06-05.1224 19.97Umag 19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7 PNV J19004295-4831017 2026-05-25.0752 14.2mag 09:55:21.28 +69:02:52.6 PNV J09552128+6902526 2026-06-13.933 18.9mag 19:51:21.42 +37:06:40.0 TCP J19512142+3706400 2026-06-17.2942 16.8mag 19:57:03.87 +37:41:46.4 TCP J19570387+3741464 2026-06-18.2638 17.5mag 00:42:32.04 +41:10:28.3 PNV J00423204+4110283 2026-06-26.059 16.6mag 02:19:17.36 +28:57:15.8 TCP J02191736+2857158 2026-07-12.3549 12.5mag 00:44:56.43 +41:57:41.6 PNV J00445643+4157416 2026-07-13.8026 17.98Cmag 00:42:55.36 +41:17:27.0 PNV J00425536+4117270 2026-07-20.1813 17.7mag 20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9 TCP J20354364+6131329 2026-07-20.5443 14.4mag 21:17:31.48 +22:25:51.0 TCP J21173148+2225510 2026-07-23.5577 14.8mag 00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8 PNV J00412404+4049028 2026-07-25.0157 18.7mag 00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6 PNV J00430426+4102286 2026-07-26.1512 20mag 14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0 TCP J14515140+6613240 2026-07-29.2561 13.5mag 00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2 PNV J00430615+4122082 2026-07-30.0085 19.4mag 00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2 PNV J00413323+4110122 2026-08-02.8913 17.1mag 05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-06.4109 11.2mag 22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8 TCP J22571796+4707418 2026-08-09.3289 14.3mag 09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1 PSN J09133817+7628181 2026-08-09.8037 15.4mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 190K Aug 10 01:46 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 15:02:41.202 -40:07:42.45 AT 2026wgz 2026-07-25.81 18.304 19:21:07.943 +43:53:03.37 AT 2026wgy 2026-07-23.41 18.625 02:21:34.482 -74:52:07.44 AT 2026wgx 2026-07-25.04 18.848 04:37:07.068 -62:47:36.38 AT 2026wgw 2026-07-25.10 18.938 00:33:43.233 -65:47:43.74 AT 2026wgv 2026-07-25.01 18.502 04:50:07.913 -58:03:54.94 AT 2026wgu 2026-07-25.10 19.077 00:12:08.725 +26:08:55.67 AT 2026wgt 2026-07-25.53 18.991 02:33:53.173 -32:54:04.43 AT 2026wgs 2026-07-26.16 19.224 13:02:32.070 -25:25:26.94 AT 2026wgr 2026-07-27.36 19.26 12:39:11.802 -30:15:31.31 AT 2026wgq 2026-07-27.36 19.66 13:46:27.172 -27:34:31.34 AT 2026wgp 2026-07-27.37 18.88 13:14:57.178 -26:39:33.67 AT 2026wgo 2026-07-27.37 19.1 13:27:05.151 -31:35:28.50 AT 2026wgn 2026-07-27.37 19.19 12:06:50.757 -36:16:06.67 SN 2026wgm 2026-07-27.38 19.48 18:51:49.362 +64:34:26.30 AT 2026wgl 2026-07-23.41 19.8497 01:43:43.303 +47:40:05.54 AT 2026wgk 2026-07-27.21 20.24 22:20:19.584 +27:43:03.14 AT 2026wgj 2026-07-27.14 20.22 01:23:44.359 +57:30:17.45 AT 2026wgi 2026-07-27.08 19.54 21:41:58.633 +22:29:35.94 AT 2026wgh 2026-07-27.17 19.97 22:17:46.860 +26:37:40.46 AT 2026wgg 2026-07-13.15 20.15 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 87K Aug 10 01:46 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 101 C - WARNING