FITS images used in this processing run:

Field Cam-01-Q1b1x1 reference image: Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
Field Cam-01-Q1b1x1 reference image: Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
Field Cam-01-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-38-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Field Cam-01-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461083.75171413 12.02.2026 06:02:18.101   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
First image: 2461083.75171413 12.02.2026 06:02:18.101   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
Last  image: 2461262.77754402 10.08.2026 06:39:29.803   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 5
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.63
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  10.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     55000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.37            # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  13250
Objects passed selection criteria:  13213
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.0    3.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.0    3.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 10421
Average stars matched: 9737.25 (93.4387 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   237260 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Thu Aug  6 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-190-gdf2934b0
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Mon Aug 10 01:45:22 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461083.75171413 12.02.2026 06:02:18.101   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
First image: 2461083.75171413 12.02.2026 06:02:18.101   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
Last  image: 2461262.77754402 10.08.2026 06:39:29.803   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 141
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.34
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 27 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  2.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     57000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.83            # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  77694
Objects passed selection criteria:  77495
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.0    3.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.0    3.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 60466.5
Average stars matched: 56649.8 (93.6878 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   559000 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Thu Aug  6 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-190-gdf2934b0
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Mon Aug 10 01:46:37 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Cam-01-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Cam-01-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Cam-01-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 946234 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 946234 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 

Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:

MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes


renamed 'Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-38-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.png' -> 'transient_report/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-38-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits_preview.png'

Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-38-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits


renamed 'Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.png' -> 'transient_report/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits_preview.png'

Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits




Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 661.6740
INFO:         REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 620.8029
INFO:    SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1173.5183
INFO:            SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 501.5952
INFO:   SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1171.2987
INFO:           SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 504.1316
----------------------------------------------
INFO:      ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 1.77356
INFO:                  SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.005
INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-38-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits 
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-38-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-38-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Header: 67 keys total, 4 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-10T01:38:33.5174426' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-10T06:38:33.5174426' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61262.2767768172 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-10T06:38:43.4191192' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61262.2768914234 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     89.8892229719571 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =     85.0562690069976 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     30.1608333333333 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =               4.0175 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     1.98469429351943 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =     33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=    -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'Cam-01'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '06 00 00'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+85 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                29507 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                29507 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 56: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 57: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 58: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 59: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 60: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 61: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 62: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 63: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 64: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-38-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-38-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-38-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/d_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-38-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits :)

Spent 0.560231 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/d_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-38-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 26658.571233
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-38-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=17308.5, right_median=19900.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-38-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits 
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
Header: 67 keys total, 4 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-10T01:39:29.8035926' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-10T06:39:29.8035926' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61262.2774282754 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-10T06:39:39.7160329' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61262.2775430093 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     89.8892221558814 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =      85.056269035298 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     30.1744444444444 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     4.03472222222222 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     1.98388958164118 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =     33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=    -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'Cam-01'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '06 00 00'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+85 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                29507 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                29507 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 56: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 57: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 58: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 59: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 60: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 61: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 62: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 63: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 64: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/d_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits :)

Spent 0.703180 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/d_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 26658.571233
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=17308.5, right_median=19900.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-38-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:


fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-38-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits



fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits




Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1

  ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-38-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-38-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461262.77689256
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits'
wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits'
wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-38-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-38-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-38-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-38-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits'
wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
Image size: 942.0'x627.1'  15.7(deg)x10.5(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:58:09.354 +85:01:41.35 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-38-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-38-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.7'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:55:41.891 +85:00:59.95 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:58:09.354 +85:01:41.35
Second-epoch image center 05:55:41.891 +85:00:59.95
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0545 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.7'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:55:39.909 +85:00:49.11 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:58:09.354 +85:01:41.35
Second-epoch image center 05:55:39.909 +85:00:49.11
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0560 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  05:55:41.891 +85:00:59.95
Second-epoch second image center 05:55:39.909 +85:00:49.11
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00310 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LqHggXCIlM
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits &> /tmp/tmp.EDscKWP5f4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-38-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0ecaAdzmQM
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-38-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kvDWzuGgQS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits and wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits and wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat 
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits and wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 12096 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 181.3580 to 179.5073 deg, Dec +75.8491 to +89.8984 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 181.3580 to 179.5073 deg, Dec 75.8491 to 89.8984 deg
Loaded 33013 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7262 out of 7632 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7632 out of 12096 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.843350
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.843350
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.63
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.21

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.21

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 12096 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 181.3580 to 179.5073 deg, Dec +75.8491 to +89.8984 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 181.3580 to 179.5073 deg, Dec 75.8491 to 89.8984 deg
Loaded 33013 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7262 out of 7632 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7632 out of 12096 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits (aperture=6.0)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 12185 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 180.0696 to 179.5067 deg, Dec +75.8292 to +89.9114 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 180.0696 to 179.5067 deg, Dec 75.8292 to 89.9114 deg
Loaded 33178 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7284 out of 7665 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7665 out of 12185 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 5 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.1 pix  Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
 2.1 pix  Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
 2.9 pix  fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-38-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
 2.9 pix  fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.2 mag.  Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
 15.2 mag.  Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
 14.4 mag.  fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-38-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
 14.4 mag.  fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  14.4 (SNR )  11.8 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.LqHggXCIlM (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=848, bad_region=0, passed=12096
Got 12096 stars (including 11236 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12096 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 181.3580 through 0 to 179.5073, gap 179.5073 to 181.3580
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 829 to 900 (Dec 75.8 to 89.9)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4923 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4918 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12096 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 181.3577 through 0 to 179.5070, gap 179.5070 to 181.3577
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 829 to 900 (Dec 75.8 to 89.9)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4923 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12096 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12096 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" 
Excluding outliers - 4918 stars left (next iteration limit 5409)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits N_match=4918 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.272 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.258 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.277 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.230 n_q1=1173 n_q2=1016 n_q3=1274 n_q4=1455 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.278
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits -region wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.EDscKWP5f4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=862, bad_region=0, passed=12185
Got 12185 stars (including 11310 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12185 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0696 through 0 to 179.5067, gap 179.5067 to 180.0696
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 829 to 900 (Dec 75.8 to 89.9)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12185 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0710 through 0 to 179.5079, gap 179.5079 to 180.0710
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 829 to 900 (Dec 75.8 to 89.9)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12185 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12185 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" 
Excluding outliers - 4922 stars left (next iteration limit 5413)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits N_match=4922 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.255 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.244 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.243 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.225 n_q1=1180 n_q2=1019 n_q3=1259 n_q4=1464 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.306
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits -region wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.0ecaAdzmQM (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-38-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-38-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-38-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-38-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-38-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-38-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-38-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-38-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-38-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-38-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-38-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-38-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-38-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-38-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-38-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=388, bad_region=0, passed=8797
Got 8797 stars (including 8400 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-38-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8797 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0298 through 0 to 179.9688, gap 179.9688 to 180.0298
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.2 to 89.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4918 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4910 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8797 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0267 through 0 to 179.9660, gap 179.9660 to 180.0267
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.2 to 89.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8797 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8797 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" 
Excluding outliers - 4909 stars left (next iteration limit 5401)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4909 robust_rms=8.819 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=17.955 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4909 robust_rms=0.368 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.381 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4909 robust_rms=0.281 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.324 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4909 robust_rms_before=0.831 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.282 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.281 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.308 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.324
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.308 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-38-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits N_match=4909 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.249 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.246 n_q1=1455 n_q2=1096 n_q3=1381 n_q4=977 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.095
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-38-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-38-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-38-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-38-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-38-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.kvDWzuGgQS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=407, bad_region=0, passed=8839
Got 8839 stars (including 8420 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8839 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0307 through 0 to 179.9703, gap 179.9703 to 180.0307
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.2 to 89.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4919 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4911 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8839 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0271 through 0 to 179.9671, gap 179.9671 to 180.0271
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.2 to 89.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4919 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8839 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8839 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" 
Excluding outliers - 4911 stars left (next iteration limit 5402)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4911 robust_rms=9.045 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=17.138 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4911 robust_rms=0.377 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.403 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4911 robust_rms=0.288 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.313 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4911 robust_rms_before=0.856 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.288 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.288 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.307 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.313
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.307 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits N_match=4911 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.281 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.299 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.260 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.249 n_q1=1453 n_q2=1102 n_q3=1369 n_q4=987 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.115
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits sigma_overall=0.272 worst_q_ratio=1.278
ref2=Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits sigma_overall=0.255 worst_q_ratio=1.306
new1=fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-38-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits sigma_overall=0.279 worst_q_ratio=1.095
new2=fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits sigma_overall=0.281 worst_q_ratio=1.115
reference average sigma_overall=0.2635 worst_q_ratio=1.292
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################

Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250_astrometric_residuals.png (4918 matched stars from wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251_astrometric_residuals.png (4922 matched stars from wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.23 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-38-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252_astrometric_residuals.png (4909 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-38-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253_astrometric_residuals.png (4911 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)


Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-38-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-38-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-38-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20723_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 20723_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    11.01    04:13:05.59 +86:52:28.7   3959 4490   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

**** FOUND  04:13:06.15 +86:52:28.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21463_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 21463_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    10.89    06:23:25.58 +80:04:17.2   5545 0264   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

**** FOUND  06:23:25.64 +80:04:17.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22222_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 22222_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    11.98    00:27:20.38 +86:54:59.5   2909 5926   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

**** FOUND  00:27:20.54 +86:54:59.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11786_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 11786_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    9.78    02:43:16.20 +81:08:13.0   0809 2567   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

**** FOUND  02:43:16.16 +81:08:13.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10607_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 10607_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    10.63    04:55:34.48 +80:57:33.6   3407 0916   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

**** FOUND  04:55:34.53 +80:57:33.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL

  ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-38-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-38-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-38-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-38-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
Image size: 942.0'x627.1'  15.7(deg)x10.5(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:58:09.354 +85:01:41.35 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-38-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-38-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.7'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:55:41.891 +85:00:59.95 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:58:09.354 +85:01:41.35
Second-epoch image center 05:55:41.891 +85:00:59.95
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0545 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.7'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:55:39.909 +85:00:49.11 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:58:09.354 +85:01:41.35
Second-epoch image center 05:55:39.909 +85:00:49.11
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0560 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  05:55:41.891 +85:00:59.95
Second-epoch second image center 05:55:39.909 +85:00:49.11
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00310 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Lc0Bs8B9ts
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits &> /tmp/tmp.i3e8FGGsV6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-38-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits &> /tmp/tmp.suX0hX9cpw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-38-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fpnV2ICg2w
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits and wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits and wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat 
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits and wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 75571 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 180.0704 to 179.9879 deg, Dec +75.7296 to +89.9628 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 180.0704 to 179.9879 deg, Dec 75.7296 to 89.9628 deg
Loaded 33692 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6762 out of 7807 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7807 out of 75571 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.714550
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.714550
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.34
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.37

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.37

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 75571 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 180.0704 to 179.9879 deg, Dec +75.7296 to +89.9628 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 180.0704 to 179.9879 deg, Dec 75.7296 to 89.9628 deg
Loaded 33692 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6762 out of 7807 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7807 out of 75571 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits (aperture=4.6)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 75116 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 180.0694 to 179.9961 deg, Dec +75.7501 to +89.9630 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 180.0694 to 179.9961 deg, Dec 75.7501 to 89.9630 deg
Loaded 33600 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6759 out of 7815 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7815 out of 75116 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 129 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 1.9 pix  Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
 2.0 pix  Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
 2.8 pix  fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-38-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
 2.8 pix  fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.4 mag.  Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
 15.4 mag.  Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
 14.6 mag.  fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-38-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
 14.6 mag.  fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  14.6 (SNR )  14.0 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.Lc0Bs8B9ts (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=4540, bad_region=2, passed=75560
Got 75560 stars (including 70879 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 75560 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0704 through 0 to 179.9879, gap 179.9879 to 180.0704
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 828 to 900 (Dec 75.7 to 90.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75560 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0705 through 0 to 179.9881, gap 179.9881 to 180.0705
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 828 to 900 (Dec 75.7 to 90.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75560 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75560 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" 
Excluding outliers - 4922 stars left (next iteration limit 5414)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits N_match=4922 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.259 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.255 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.255 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.227 n_q1=1150 n_q2=1043 n_q3=1285 n_q4=1444 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.263
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits -region wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.i3e8FGGsV6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=4531, bad_region=0, passed=75103
Got 75103 stars (including 70436 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 75103 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0694 through 0 to 179.9961, gap 179.9961 to 180.0694
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 828 to 900 (Dec 75.8 to 90.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75103 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0711 through 0 to 179.9966, gap 179.9966 to 180.0711
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 828 to 900 (Dec 75.8 to 90.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75103 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75103 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" 
Excluding outliers - 4922 stars left (next iteration limit 5414)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits N_match=4922 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.249 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.252 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.232 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.218 n_q1=1153 n_q2=1048 n_q3=1273 n_q4=1448 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.270
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits -region wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.suX0hX9cpw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-38-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-38-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-38-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-38-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-38-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-38-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-38-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-38-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-38-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-38-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-38-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-38-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-38-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-38-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-38-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=1981, bad_region=30, passed=46154
Got 46154 stars (including 44077 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-38-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 46154 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0088 through 0 to 179.9902, gap 179.9902 to 180.0088
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.2 to 90.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4918 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4914 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46154 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0002 through 0 to 179.9914, gap 179.9914 to 180.0002
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.2 to 90.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4918 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46154 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46154 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" 
Excluding outliers - 4914 stars left (next iteration limit 5405)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-38-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-38-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits N_match=4914 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.286 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.301 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.257 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.249 n_q1=1444 n_q2=1068 n_q3=1396 n_q4=1006 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.102
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-38-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-38-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-38-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-38-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-38-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.fpnV2ICg2w (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=2050, bad_region=33, passed=46663
Got 46663 stars (including 44523 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 46663 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0080 through 0 to 179.9911, gap 179.9911 to 180.0080
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.2 to 90.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4922 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4918 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46663 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0272 through 0 to 179.9976, gap 179.9976 to 180.0272
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.2 to 90.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4921 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46663 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46663 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" 
Excluding outliers - 4917 stars left (next iteration limit 5409)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits N_match=4917 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.288 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.270 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.251 n_q1=1442 n_q2=1084 n_q3=1392 n_q4=999 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.098
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-38-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-38-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 01:50:33.12 +81:43:17.6:  13.04 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 02:47:21.31 +86:42:39.2:  13.30 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 09:07:24.47 +80:17:50.5:  13.39 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 09:07:24.47 +80:17:50.5:  13.46 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 01:50:33.12 +81:43:17.6:  13.00 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.42 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.02 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:07:24.47 +80:17:50.5: ref_mag=13.42 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3697 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:50:33.12 +81:43:17.6: ref_mag=13.02 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1108 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 02:47:21.31 +86:42:39.2:  13.29 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.30 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:47:21.31 +86:42:39.2: ref_mag=13.30 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3413 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 07:09:20.08 +85:35:57.8:  12.92 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 07:09:20.08 +85:35:57.8:  12.91 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.92 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:09:20.08 +85:35:57.8: ref_mag=12.92 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8202 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 09:36:26.91 +81:21:16.1:  13.18 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 09:36:26.91 +81:21:16.1:  13.07 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.12 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:36:26.91 +81:21:16.1: ref_mag=13.12 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8881 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 01:54:51.19 +83:46:13.3:  13.88 +/- 0.06  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 02:45:36.54 +83:37:51.8:  13.76 +/- 0.06  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 02:45:36.54 +83:37:51.8:  13.81 +/- 0.06  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 00:22:28.84 +83:23:54.0:  13.67 +/- 0.06  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 01:54:51.19 +83:46:13.3:  13.77 +/- 0.06  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.78 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:45:36.54 +83:37:51.8: ref_mag=13.78 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5765 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.82 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:54:51.19 +83:46:13.3: ref_mag=13.82 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6759 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 03:47:59.48 +80:54:21.5:  13.77 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 00:22:28.84 +83:23:54.0:  13.55 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.61 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:22:28.84 +83:23:54.0: ref_mag=13.61 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6013 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 01:24:19.01 +84:31:14.7:  13.75 +/- 0.07  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 23:55:17.01 +86:46:01.9:  14.32 +/- 0.10  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 03:47:59.48 +80:54:21.5:  13.66 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.71 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:47:59.48 +80:54:21.5: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5532 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 01:24:19.01 +84:31:14.7:  13.82 +/- 0.07  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.79 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:24:19.01 +84:31:14.7: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.7262 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 23:55:17.01 +86:46:01.9:  14.17 +/- 0.09  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.24 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:55:17.01 +86:46:01.9: ref_mag=14.24 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.6921 delta=0.54 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 05:09:33.99 +87:11:02.6:  14.23 +/- 0.08  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 05:09:33.99 +87:11:02.6:  14.17 +/- 0.08  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.20 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:09:33.99 +87:11:02.6: ref_mag=14.20 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0105 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 00:04:26.00 +86:47:35.2:  14.90 +/- 0.16  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 01:35:31.80 +82:37:45.6:  14.92 +/- 0.18  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 02:23:09.87 +83:33:58.6:  14.77 +/- 0.14  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 00:04:26.00 +86:47:35.2:  15.14 +/- 0.20  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  15.00 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:04:26.00 +86:47:35.2: ref_mag=15.00 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5621 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 01:35:31.80 +82:37:45.6:  15.00 +/- 0.20  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.96 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:35:31.80 +82:37:45.6: ref_mag=14.96 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.5670 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 02:23:09.87 +83:33:58.6:  15.01 +/- 0.18  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.86 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:23:09.87 +83:33:58.6: ref_mag=14.86 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5508 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 5s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91172_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 91172_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    13.85    01:22:41.61 +85:18:51.8   2136 5120   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

**** FOUND  01:22:41.18 +85:18:52.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91173_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 91173_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    13.72    02:40:53.82 +81:07:03.1   0762 2600   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91175_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 91175_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 10.27689    2461262.77689    13.35    09:07:24.84 +80:17:50.9   9158 2314   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-38-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    13.39    09:07:24.10 +80:17:50.1   9158 2316   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91176_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 91176_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    13.46    03:09:48.40 +83:29:03.4   2189 3220   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

**** FOUND  03:09:48.29 +83:29:02.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91180_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 91180_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 10.27689    2461262.77689    13.49    02:47:21.82 +86:42:39.5   3317 4829   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-38-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    13.25    02:47:20.81 +86:42:38.9   3317 4831   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91184_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 91184_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    13.32    02:29:03.45 +82:12:42.0   1098 3231   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

**** FOUND  02:29:03.39 +82:12:42.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91186_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 91186_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 10.27689    2461262.77689    13.11    01:50:33.57 +81:43:16.7   0383 3734   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-38-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    13.11    01:50:32.68 +81:43:18.5   0383 3736   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91187_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 91187_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    11.89    02:46:54.89 +84:36:27.6   2395 3958   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

**** FOUND  02:46:54.62 +84:36:27.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91753_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 91753_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    10.76    03:59:09.21 +86:24:48.2   3725 4297   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91927_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 91927_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    11.10    08:21:09.21 +88:22:49.9   5342 5422   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92352_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 92352_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    11.32    08:17:12.77 +80:19:53.1   8188 1476   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92799_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 92799_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    12.09    00:27:21.02 +86:54:59.6   2909 5926   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

**** FOUND  00:27:21.08 +86:54:59.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93044_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 93044_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    12.02    05:32:14.54 +81:46:53.3   4308 1267   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93088_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 93088_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    12.06    05:27:08.79 +82:42:59.5   4262 1839   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93143_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 93143_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    12.24    23:16:59.53 +89:33:56.9   4494 6247   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93243_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 93243_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    12.18    06:02:54.29 +82:11:55.3   4957 1504   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93295_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 93295_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    12.30    03:20:38.07 +87:26:16.5   3801 4983   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93535_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 93535_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    12.32    05:06:38.53 +80:48:20.6   3644 0767   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93986_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 93986_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    12.42    09:28:08.64 +83:17:26.7   8022 3807   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93996_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 93996_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    12.63    06:39:07.84 +87:50:19.3   5014 4923   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94120_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 94120_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    12.79    01:03:52.51 +82:12:50.7   0250 4763   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94149_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 94149_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    12.90    02:49:02.45 +81:13:29.7   0941 2507   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94707_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 94707_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 10.27689    2461262.77689    12.84    07:09:20.29 +85:35:57.9   5619 3691   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-38-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    12.80    07:09:19.87 +85:35:57.7   5619 3693   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94745_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 94745_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    12.95    02:18:05.64 +89:17:34.1   4409 5951   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

**** FOUND  02:18:01.35 +89:17:34.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94807_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 94807_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    13.07    01:18:16.80 +82:11:31.8   0341 4478   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95050_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 95050_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    13.52    00:36:22.48 +83:19:34.5   0774 5442   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95145_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 95145_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    13.25    08:25:20.36 +88:39:58.2   5250 5569   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95147_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 95147_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    13.09    04:27:23.53 +80:51:07.7   2746 1058   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

**** FOUND  04:27:23.20 +80:51:08.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95238_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 95238_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    13.11    03:24:34.39 +81:27:18.7   1646 2079   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95303_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 95303_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    13.25    02:36:37.94 +81:39:19.4   0943 2890   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

**** FOUND  02:36:37.65 +81:39:20.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95340_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 95340_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    13.22    01:48:55.80 +81:41:26.1   0349 3757   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95354_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 95354_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    13.43    00:30:31.51 +87:49:00.1   3451 5989   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95454_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 95454_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 10.27689    2461262.77689    12.89    09:36:27.04 +81:21:16.7   9085 3263   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-38-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    12.89    09:36:26.77 +81:21:15.6   9085 3265   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95530_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 95530_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    13.38    03:01:33.31 +81:06:56.9   1105 2257   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95554_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 95554_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    13.09    01:24:35.42 +81:48:07.2   0171 4264   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95576_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 95576_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    13.17    02:17:01.68 +81:46:49.0   0732 3271   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95627_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 95627_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    13.23    04:03:05.49 +81:13:05.9   2315 1494   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

**** FOUND  04:03:05.25 +81:13:05.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95661_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 95661_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    13.12    01:11:28.30 +87:11:53.9   3159 5634   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95716_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 95716_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    12.97    09:46:04.19 +81:29:49.3   9133 3495   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95774_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 95774_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    13.27    02:36:40.83 +89:12:51.3   4395 5893   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

**** FOUND  02:36:46.92 +89:12:51.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95895_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 95895_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    13.20    07:53:34.53 +81:05:05.8   7451 1547   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96058_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 96058_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    13.20    07:57:34.63 +81:26:30.9   7420 1780   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96147_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 96147_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    13.37    02:59:26.06 +85:11:49.2   2766 4092   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

**** FOUND  02:59:25.81 +85:11:48.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96241_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 96241_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    13.44    02:55:07.43 +82:23:40.2   1540 2917   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

**** FOUND  02:55:07.99 +82:23:39.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96339_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 96339_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 10.27689    2461262.77689    13.57    02:45:36.67 +83:37:51.0   1952 3565   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-38-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    13.58    02:45:36.42 +83:37:52.7   1952 3566   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96350_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 96350_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    13.44    03:50:58.96 +83:44:53.8   2845 2949   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96500_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 96500_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    13.43    09:55:19.26 +83:31:13.8   8165 4279   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96523_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 96523_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 10.27689    2461262.77689    13.67    01:54:51.17 +83:46:12.8   1508 4287   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-38-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    13.68    01:54:51.21 +83:46:13.8   1509 4288   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96662_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 96662_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    13.57    02:02:39.91 +81:05:04.8   0193 3299   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96673_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 96673_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    13.37    06:34:53.64 +82:18:12.7   5595 1640   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96703_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 96703_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 10.27689    2461262.77689    13.71    00:22:29.23 +83:23:54.5   0776 5690   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-38-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    13.54    00:22:28.44 +83:23:53.4   0776 5691   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96773_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 96773_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    13.28    09:05:25.24 +80:14:26.2   9150 2255   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

**** FOUND  09:05:25.72 +80:14:26.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96788_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 96788_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 10.27689    2461262.77689    13.55    03:48:00.06 +80:54:20.7   1910 1499   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-38-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    13.56    03:47:58.90 +80:54:22.2   1911 1501   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96844_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 96844_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    13.36    05:54:37.60 +79:54:24.2   4798 0111   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96932_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 96932_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    13.28    08:32:22.22 +87:05:07.1   5879 4851   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97022_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 97022_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    13.25    04:48:59.88 +80:35:00.0   3193 0737   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97068_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 97068_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    13.60    08:16:23.48 +84:04:34.6   6842 3305   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

**** FOUND  08:16:23.66 +84:04:35.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97158_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 97158_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 10.27689    2461262.77689    13.78    23:55:14.20 +86:46:01.6   2796 6185   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-38-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    13.64    23:55:19.82 +86:46:02.1   2796 6186   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97593_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 97593_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 10.27689    2461262.77689    13.90    01:24:19.06 +84:31:15.8   1700 4913   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-38-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    13.62    01:24:18.97 +84:31:13.6   1699 4914   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97844_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 97844_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    13.50    08:18:32.46 +80:46:39.7   8054 1715   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98040_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 98040_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    14.02    03:57:53.69 +85:13:27.7   3371 3674   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98049_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 98049_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    13.96    00:27:00.32 +84:40:20.5   1559 5727   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98083_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 98083_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    13.43    06:28:26.36 +80:03:27.1   5676 0274   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98119_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 98119_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    13.96    01:26:14.21 +84:38:35.4   1779 4918   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98142_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 98142_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    13.81    04:36:17.95 +82:50:44.3   3342 2125   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98209_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 98209_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    14.09    01:06:52.62 +84:45:22.8   1744 5196   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98300_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 98300_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    14.31    01:21:59.91 +82:58:59.7   0819 4590   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98312_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 98312_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    13.86    00:39:08.74 +85:08:31.8   1871 5615   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98412_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 98412_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    14.11    23:48:37.69 +84:28:33.8   1398 6272   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98436_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 98436_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    14.02    03:12:38.64 +82:57:05.5   2019 2941   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98488_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 98488_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    13.72    06:39:16.19 +84:46:21.1   5384 3114   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98490_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 98490_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 10.27689    2461262.77689    13.97    05:09:35.68 +87:11:00.8   4434 4529   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-38-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    14.06    05:09:32.31 +87:11:04.5   4434 4532   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98552_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 98552_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    14.33    01:16:54.85 +85:03:52.4   1967 5132   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98597_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 98597_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    13.72    08:06:56.61 +81:06:38.4   7710 1724   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98608_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 98608_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    13.81    09:41:13.61 +83:28:18.2   8063 4057   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98626_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 98626_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    13.97    04:58:06.05 +83:54:55.4   3887 2637   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98688_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 98688_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    13.79    08:17:53.72 +79:33:17.0   8483 1103   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98723_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 98723_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    14.11    02:20:56.12 +83:12:08.3   1475 3725   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98807_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 98807_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    14.03    02:13:33.25 +84:37:07.0   2098 4327   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99015_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 99015_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    13.91    03:03:32.55 +80:59:16.1   1087 2168   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99057_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 99057_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    14.16    01:45:58.20 +85:08:05.1   2165 4808   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99097_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 99097_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    14.16    04:49:04.66 +84:40:26.9   3873 3113   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99148_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 99148_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    14.44    23:58:11.31 +84:09:17.7   1203 6127   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99160_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 99160_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    13.42    08:14:24.79 +79:50:39.7   8302 1192   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99212_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 99212_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    13.92    06:42:00.15 +82:22:15.5   5727 1708   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99232_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 99232_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    14.12    03:07:31.81 +84:53:35.2   2721 3885   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99338_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 99338_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    14.35    00:22:47.41 +83:20:58.9   0747 5682   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99354_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 99354_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    14.25    04:31:08.27 +82:36:16.3   3200 2021   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99374_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 99374_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    14.10    00:42:58.50 +87:32:27.0   3302 5882   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99418_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 99418_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    13.93    09:39:49.01 +83:13:57.2   8171 3957   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99420_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 99420_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    13.62    09:39:44.49 +81:23:29.1   9109 3340   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99462_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 99462_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    14.37    01:42:52.33 +83:53:23.2   1476 4494   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99465_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 99465_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    14.00    05:37:01.32 +81:15:52.4   4389 0947   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99494_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 99494_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    13.86    07:40:28.68 +80:39:21.3   7298 1169   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99552_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 99552_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    14.24    02:46:34.69 +83:53:38.0   2079 3664   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99602_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 99602_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    14.29    04:13:52.54 +81:40:46.7   2656 1640   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99603_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 99603_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    14.27    03:45:49.76 +83:54:17.6   2822 3073   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99617_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 99617_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    14.36    00:44:20.37 +86:20:42.6   2598 5712   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99649_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 99649_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    14.20    06:04:09.64 +86:02:09.4   4870 3813   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99692_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 99692_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    14.20    09:45:43.18 +83:13:26.8   8233 4043   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99707_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 99707_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    14.07    09:31:13.61 +83:39:56.5   7869 3983   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99715_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 99715_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    14.06    09:34:42.74 +84:31:09.8   7477 4324   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99724_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 99724_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    14.37    06:56:07.33 +84:54:15.7   5587 3245   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99734_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 99734_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    14.37    07:31:35.97 +87:42:08.1   5331 4941   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99778_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 99778_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    13.89    05:03:42.66 +80:43:20.6   3564 0732   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99798_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 99798_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 10.27689    2461262.77689    14.56    00:04:25.03 +86:47:35.5   2815 6107   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-38-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    14.56    00:04:26.97 +86:47:34.9   2815 6108   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99802_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 99802_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    14.27    06:59:14.71 +86:40:53.5   5323 4282   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99826_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 99826_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 10.27689    2461262.77689    14.60    01:35:31.98 +82:37:45.0   0729 4266   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-38-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    14.54    01:35:31.63 +82:37:46.3   0729 4267   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99828_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 99828_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    14.39    00:45:07.64 +83:33:26.7   0946 5322   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99829_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 99829_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    14.28    06:07:51.63 +81:09:30.6   5099 0882   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99835_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 99835_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    14.47    09:03:22.17 +83:24:55.5   7686 3520   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99844_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 99844_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    14.06    07:51:17.63 +79:58:05.1   7740 0929   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99852_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 99852_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    13.93    07:09:57.85 +83:55:55.6   5956 2748   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99859_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 99859_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    14.27    09:16:07.10 +80:55:44.1   9005 2730   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99863_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 99863_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    14.08    06:01:07.47 +83:57:09.9   4883 2559   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99878_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 99878_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 10.27689    2461262.77689    14.58    02:23:09.76 +83:33:58.4   1674 3827   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-38-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0252.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    14.53    02:23:09.98 +83:33:58.8   1675 3828   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99888_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 99888_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    14.42    07:02:38.60 +80:33:00.1   6456 0761   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99896_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 99896_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    14.43    08:15:20.36 +84:52:08.0   6551 3684   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99916_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 99916_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    14.57    03:27:56.77 +86:53:07.8   3644 4684   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99959_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 99959_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    14.70    03:16:21.76 +85:48:04.1   3157 4234   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87305_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 87305_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    11.59    02:06:53.53 +89:02:47.4   4273 5886   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57632_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 57632_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    12.39    04:21:49.22 +84:46:14.6   3536 3292   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

**** FOUND  04:21:49.20 +84:46:15.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66646_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 66646_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    10.95    06:23:25.55 +80:04:17.4   5545 0264   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

**** FOUND  06:23:25.63 +80:04:17.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 43359_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 43359_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    14.11    05:10:09.73 +79:56:27.0   3630 0234   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 44223_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 44223_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    9.91    02:43:16.20 +81:08:13.1   0809 2567   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

**** FOUND  02:43:16.16 +81:08:13.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 48263_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 48263_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    10.65    04:55:34.50 +80:57:33.7   3407 0916   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

**** FOUND  04:55:34.56 +80:57:33.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28902_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 28902_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    6.86    07:31:03.04 +82:24:42.4   6648 2038   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

**** FOUND  07:31:02.96 +82:24:42.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29091_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 29091_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    6.71    08:04:46.37 +79:28:45.4   8208 0861   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

**** FOUND  08:04:46.45 +79:28:45.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03297_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253
The candidate 03297_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 08 10.27754    2461262.77754    6.59    09:37:03.47 +81:19:37.4   9107 3267   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-10_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014155_TTUQ1b1x1_2800065_nOMG4GBm/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-10_01-39-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0253.fits

**** FOUND  09:37:03.51 +81:19:37.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 7s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
########### Completed Cam-01-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
###################################################################################
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO  ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461262.77689256 -observatory V36
08:11:11.74 +20:08:31.7 Mercury (-0.8mag)
12:09:58.54 -02:02:45.0 Venus (-4.4mag)
05:55:14.71 +23:39:01.7 Mars (1.3mag)
08:44:47.43 +18:34:24.0 Jupiter (-1.8mag)
00:56:15.71 +03:13:49.0 Saturn (0.6mag)
04:11:57.76 +20:57:33.2 Uranus (5.7mag)
00:15:58.74 +00:12:16.1 Neptune (7.7mag)
20:27:56.72 -23:30:58.0 Pluto (14.5mag)
07:02:53.26 +25:41:06.2 Moon (-8.9mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Aug 10 01:45 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461262.77689256:
08:44:44.62 +18:34:36.3 Io (6.0mag)
08:44:39.06 +18:35:01.5 Europa (6.3mag)
08:44:47.46 +18:34:21.7 Ganymede (5.6mag)
08:45:11.08 +18:32:44.3 Callisto (6.8mag)
08:42:19.20 +18:35:01.8 Himalia (15.7mag)
08:44:45.56 +18:34:32.8 Thebe (16.6mag)
08:41:52.50 +18:33:09.1 Elara (17.7mag)
08:48:55.16 +18:12:54.4 Pasiphae (17.9mag)
08:47:50.10 +18:45:07.4 Carme (19.0mag)
00:56:02.69 +03:13:47.8 Titan (8.4mag)
00:56:11.93 +03:13:57.0 Rhea (9.7mag)
00:56:30.70 +03:12:58.5 Iapetus (11.1mag)
00:56:05.68 +03:13:21.2 Hyperion (14.4mag)
00:55:35.51 +03:06:43.8 Phoebe (16.5mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Aug 10 01:45 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461262.77689256:
19:11:21.66 -21:58:48.3 JWST
06:56:39.26 -30:01:43.3 Chandra
09:57:51.20 -55:51:31.2 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Aug 10 01:45 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461262.77689256 -observatory V36
03:15:59.64 +17:32:55.3 17.6mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist)
18:01:14.74 -34:36:51.3 14.0mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
06:55:41.73 -68:58:39.4 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
06:10:21.62 +33:02:13.1 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
03:49:46.22 +38:32:25.9 16.9mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
22:36:56.37 +31:19:20.1 17.3mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
06:45:31.61 +26:30:20.5 16.8mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
10:23:28.21 +28:22:38.4 17.0mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
09:30:14.39 +05:18:21.7 17.9mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
15:12:49.21 -12:21:56.3 17.9mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
21:08:01.97 +65:46:58.6 17.9mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
15:45:49.45 -13:07:41.8 14.4mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
08:10:23.91 +31:26:20.4 15.3mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:06:38.29 +15:36:04.0 17.7mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
19:00:33.31 +43:11:46.6 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
21:07:41.11 +49:19:44.3 17.6mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS)
05:16:46.89 -12:56:43.0 15.4mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
06:57:33.79 +23:47:40.2 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
07:31:40.58 -16:25:35.0 17.8mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS)
10:35:45.53 +20:46:32.8 17.3mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
12:59:22.11 +02:12:48.6 17.0mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
16:02:50.32 +77:38:10.1 16.7mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
03:08:12.46 +46:13:36.9 17.1mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
11:48:29.11 +08:45:57.9 17.3mag A/2026 E1
22:00:35.95 -28:08:53.7 6.9mag 10P/Tempel
11:30:11.49 -03:31:33.0 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
04:41:46.63 +32:38:11.5 18.0mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson
11:11:52.81 +03:58:07.6 17.3mag 63P/Wild
00:54:04.60 -05:31:35.2 15.4mag 65P/Gunn
05:40:12.76 +20:39:41.6 13.7mag 78P/Gehrels
20:36:06.52 -23:45:40.0 17.7mag 84P/Giclas
03:02:44.57 +13:50:32.0 16.7mag 88P/Howell
08:01:08.71 +27:22:51.8 16.2mag 93P/Lovas
04:12:06.93 +17:40:16.1 17.5mag 112P/Urata-Niijima
06:03:16.93 +30:05:20.3 16.2mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
09:23:22.35 +26:18:02.8 15.0mag 123P/West-Hartley
11:47:49.44 -11:03:25.3 17.1mag 124P/Mrkos
05:39:35.46 +21:10:19.0 16.1mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
06:32:02.13 +18:48:02.4 17.9mag 131P/Mueller
00:03:02.67 +03:23:09.5 17.6mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma
03:19:27.73 -19:05:50.0 13.7mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
07:23:16.28 +37:54:26.2 15.9mag 162P/SidingSpring
14:32:05.42 +41:35:43.7 12.1mag 169P/NEAT
02:46:44.98 +09:32:26.0 17.6mag 220P/McNaught
16:42:40.60 -10:14:18.9 17.7mag 235P/LINEAR
20:21:03.65 -52:47:34.4 17.8mag 259P/Garradd
03:28:07.25 +26:02:08.3 15.3mag 260P/McNaught
07:11:34.95 +37:40:01.1 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR
15:11:09.00 +02:54:45.2 17.7mag 391P/Kowalski
09:02:45.85 +18:16:32.0 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.5K Aug 10 01:45 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40  AT2026wdy  2026-08-5.05 16.08
22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90  AT2026wek  2026-08-3.82 17.17
14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60  ASASSN-26ev  2026-08-2.15 14.02
12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20  SN2026wgm  2026-08-1.73 15.61
16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00  ASASSN-26er  2026-07-25.82 15.09
01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00  SN2026vbh  2026-07-25.61 15.97
21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90  ASASSN-26eq  2026-07-24.37 15.13
18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60  ASASSN-26ep  2026-07-23.47 -4.06
12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50  ASASSN-26et  2026-07-22.76 13.98
13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60  SN2026uwk  2026-07-21.75 16.38
18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90  ASASSN-26en  2026-07-21.77 14.63
14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10  ASASSN-26es  2026-07-20.79 15.36
20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00  ASASSN-26em  2026-07-20.94 16.83
18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70  ASASSN-26eu  2026-07-20.93 14.86
03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40  AT2026ugi  2026-07-20.03 17.12
18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80  ASASSN-26eo  2026-07-19.36 16.16
04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80  ASASSN-26ej  2026-07-16.17 17.02
18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90  ASASSN-26ek  2026-07-16.24 15.73
17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50  ASASSN-26el  2026-07-15.86 16.01
14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30  ASASSN-26ei  2026-07-16.17 16.46
10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10  AT 2023mhb  2026-07-14.73 16.67
14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20  AT 2026unl  2026-07-15.27 17.11
10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80  ASASSN-26eh  2026-07-14.72 16.58
19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80  ASASSN-22le  2026-07-14.15 15.5
02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30  ASASSN-26ef  2026-07-12.35 15.86
23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70  SN 2026qtn  2026-07-12.22 16.47
02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40  ASASSN-26ec  2026-07-11.53 2.78
18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50  AT2026stb  2026-07-11.28 -1.29
13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00  AT2026pjf  2026-07-10.18 -0.72
17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70  SN2026pir  2026-07-9.86 -0.66
11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30  ASASSN-26ed  2026-07-8.8 -1.3
23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10  AT2026qil  2026-07-9.3 16.15
20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10  ASASSN-26ee  2026-07-7.22 15.53
19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80  AT2026ryu  2026-07-7.17 14.88
11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50  AT2026qqg  2026-07-5.01 16.82
19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30  AT2026qly  2026-07-5.02 17.31
17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10  ASASSN-26ea  2026-07-5.07 16.67
19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30  ASASSN-26eb  2026-07-4.97 15.52
18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20  SN 2026qqp  2026-07-5.03 -0.92
19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90  ASASSN-26dz  2026-07-5.14 15.91
19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90  AT 2026rdg  2026-07-3.43 11.81
04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40  AT 2026qpr  2026-06-30.4 15.96
13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80  SN 2026pub  2026-06-30.09 16.01
16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70  SN 2026pel  2026-06-26.38 16.07
10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30  ASASSN-26dy  2026-06-25.99 15.63
14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30  ASASSN-26dv  2026-06-23.03 14.62
13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70  ASASSN-26dw  2026-06-23.04 16.09
00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20  SN 2026mke  2026-06-22.39 17.13
11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50  SN 2026nmv  2026-06-22.06 16.56
21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50  AT2026oxh  2026-06-22.15 17.14
17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90  ASASSN-26dx  2026-06-22.02 14.72
14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10  AT2026pvk  2026-06-22.06 16.53
20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20  AT2026plb  2026-06-21.31 16.4
15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30  SN2026ore  2026-06-21.29 17.57
23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30  AT2026oxl  2026-06-21.52 17.64
17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20  AT2026ouj  2026-06-20.92 15.15
00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20  AT2026ntk  2026-06-18.09 17.34
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20  ASASSN-26du  2026-06-15.39 15.93
23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00  SN2026oxc  2026-06-14.35 16.83
02:02:26.67 +32:04:22.70  AT2026ovz  2026-06-14.6 15.52
21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50  AT2026nwc  2026-06-11 17.05
17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20  SN 2026odc  2026-06-11.23 17.62
13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20  SN 2026nyq  2026-06-11.1 16.24
00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90  ASASSN-26dt  2026-06-11.13 10.22
14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60  SN2026nyp  2026-06-10.3 16.32
12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50  SN2026mta  2026-06-8.29 16.69
12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20  SN2026oao  2026-06-9.32 17.02
10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60  AT2026nvf  2026-06-8.12 16.75
13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00  SN2026npn  2026-06-8.02 17.58
00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20  ASASSN-26dq  2026-06-7.43 13.58
01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70  SN 2026obc  2026-06-7.43 15.15
21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90  ASASSN-26dr  2026-06-7.24 16.24
06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00  ASASSN-26ds  2026-06-2.97 15.02
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40  SN2026mho  2026-05-25.18 -1.12
11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10  AT2026min  2026-05-24.21 16.63
11:44:33.11 -68:48:32.90  ASASSN-26no  2026-05-24.03 8.35
19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60  ASASSN-26dp  2026-05-22.31 -3.28
14:23:56.59 -58:37:47.40  ASASSN-26dn  2026-05-20.01 14.59
11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60  AT2026nma  2026-05-20.29 15.46
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10  AT2026lli  2026-05-19.34 15.86
00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70  AT2026nad  2026-05-19.39 15.34
15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40  ASASSN-26dm  2026-05-19.03 14.44
11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10  ASASSN-26dl  2026-05-18.02 13.55
13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00  ASASSN-26dk  2026-05-18.16 12.96
02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60  ASASSN-26dh  2026-05-18.43 15.37
17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90  ASASSN-26dj  2026-05-17.05 15.7
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10  ASASSN-26dg  2026-05-13.41 16.8
16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40  AT2026mhn  2026-05-12.33 15.8
09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00  ASASSN-26di  2026-05-12.14 14.63
21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00  AT2026kwu  2026-05-12.26 16.9
14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90  AT2026ktm  2026-05-12.06 17.21
14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40  AT2026lkm  2026-05-11.18 16.89
12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80  SN2026kep  2026-05-9.06 17.5
13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90  AT2026lkd  2026-05-9.09 17.23
09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60  SN2026kmo  2026-05-8.99 17.51
15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.40  AT2026lxf  2026-05-8.07 13.88
10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30  ASASSN-26df  2026-05-8.21 16.52
22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60  2026lda  2026-05-7.56 16.2
21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30  ASASSN-26de  2026-05-6.29 14.51
16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60  ASASSN-26dd  2026-05-5.15 15.93
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Aug 10 01:45 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2  PNV J00424164+4115162  2026-06-02.029  17.4mag
00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2  PNV J00423868+4115582  2026-06-05.1224  19.97Umag
19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7  PNV J19004295-4831017  2026-05-25.0752  14.2mag
09:55:21.28 +69:02:52.6  PNV J09552128+6902526  2026-06-13.933  18.9mag
19:51:21.42 +37:06:40.0  TCP J19512142+3706400  2026-06-17.2942  16.8mag
19:57:03.87 +37:41:46.4  TCP J19570387+3741464  2026-06-18.2638  17.5mag
00:42:32.04 +41:10:28.3  PNV J00423204+4110283  2026-06-26.059  16.6mag
02:19:17.36 +28:57:15.8  TCP J02191736+2857158  2026-07-12.3549  12.5mag
00:44:56.43 +41:57:41.6  PNV J00445643+4157416  2026-07-13.8026  17.98Cmag
00:42:55.36 +41:17:27.0  PNV J00425536+4117270  2026-07-20.1813  17.7mag
20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9  TCP J20354364+6131329  2026-07-20.5443  14.4mag
21:17:31.48 +22:25:51.0  TCP J21173148+2225510  2026-07-23.5577  14.8mag
00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8  PNV J00412404+4049028  2026-07-25.0157  18.7mag
00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6  PNV J00430426+4102286  2026-07-26.1512  20mag
14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0  TCP J14515140+6613240  2026-07-29.2561  13.5mag
00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2  PNV J00430615+4122082  2026-07-30.0085  19.4mag
00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2  PNV J00413323+4110122  2026-08-02.8913  17.1mag
05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4  TCP J05210763+2338194  2026-08-06.4109  11.2mag
22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8  TCP J22571796+4707418  2026-08-09.3289  14.3mag
09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1  PSN J09133817+7628181  2026-08-09.8037  15.4mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 190K Aug 10 01:45 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
15:02:41.202 -40:07:42.45  AT 2026wgz  2026-07-25.81 18.304
19:21:07.943 +43:53:03.37  AT 2026wgy  2026-07-23.41 18.625
02:21:34.482 -74:52:07.44  AT 2026wgx  2026-07-25.04 18.848
04:37:07.068 -62:47:36.38  AT 2026wgw  2026-07-25.10 18.938
00:33:43.233 -65:47:43.74  AT 2026wgv  2026-07-25.01 18.502
04:50:07.913 -58:03:54.94  AT 2026wgu  2026-07-25.10 19.077
00:12:08.725 +26:08:55.67  AT 2026wgt  2026-07-25.53 18.991
02:33:53.173 -32:54:04.43  AT 2026wgs  2026-07-26.16 19.224
13:02:32.070 -25:25:26.94  AT 2026wgr  2026-07-27.36 19.26
12:39:11.802 -30:15:31.31  AT 2026wgq  2026-07-27.36 19.66
13:46:27.172 -27:34:31.34  AT 2026wgp  2026-07-27.37 18.88
13:14:57.178 -26:39:33.67  AT 2026wgo  2026-07-27.37 19.1
13:27:05.151 -31:35:28.50  AT 2026wgn  2026-07-27.37 19.19
12:06:50.757 -36:16:06.67  SN 2026wgm  2026-07-27.38 19.48
18:51:49.362 +64:34:26.30  AT 2026wgl  2026-07-23.41 19.8497
01:43:43.303 +47:40:05.54  AT 2026wgk  2026-07-27.21 20.24
22:20:19.584 +27:43:03.14  AT 2026wgj  2026-07-27.14 20.22
01:23:44.359 +57:30:17.45  AT 2026wgi  2026-07-27.08 19.54
21:41:58.633 +22:29:35.94  AT 2026wgh  2026-07-27.17 19.97
22:17:46.860 +26:37:40.46  AT 2026wgg  2026-07-13.15 20.15
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 87K Aug 10 01:45 tns_transients_list.txt

=== Transient Factory Profiling ===
Started: Mon Aug 10 01:44:46 CDT 2026
=======================================
TIMING SExtractor: 2 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 1 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 1 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 1 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 6s (0.10 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 33s (0.55 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 1s (0.02 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 7s (0.12 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 0s (0.00 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 0s (0.00 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 4s (0.07 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 1s (0.02 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 52s (0.87 min)
TIMING SExtractor: 15 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 5 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 0 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 5 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 29s (0.48 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 1s (0.02 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 1s (0.02 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 20s (0.33 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 3s (0.05 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 1s (0.02 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 1s (0.02 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 5s (0.08 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 1s (0.02 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 8s (0.13 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 65s (1.08 min)
FIELD_Cam-01-Q1b1x1: 131s (2.18 min)
=======================================
TOTAL_RUNTIME: 147s (2.45 min)
Finished: Mon Aug 10 01:47:13 CDT 2026