This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_231543_TTUQ1b1x1_1474660_DZjYyn6T
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 10.1741 2461262.6741 11.92 19:20:24.91 -38:13:47.5
359.95713 -21.73596 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 5.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.455 Bruchsalia 0 -1 1 11.6 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 19:20:24.91 -38:13:47.5: 14.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 19:20:24.91 -38:13:47.5: 14.27 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461262.6741,11.92,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260810.1741 11.92CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 10.1741 2461262.6741 12.19 19:49:50.41 -35:04:33.9
5.14204 -26.46434 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.1" and 5.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.139 Juewa 1 1 2 12.7 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 19:49:50.41 -35:04:33.9: 14.55 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 19:49:50.41 -35:04:33.9: 14.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461262.6741,12.19,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260810.1741 12.19CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 10.1741 2461262.6741 12.16 19:34:33.79 -35:36:25.2
3.59784 -23.63062 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 5.3 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J193433.71-353624.8
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.370 V 13.920 V 2457691.50000 82.600000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 19:34:33.79 -35:36:25.2: 13.12 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 19:34:33.79 -35:36:25.2: 13.03 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.07 +/- 0.07
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J193433.71-353624.8,2461262.6741,12.16,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J193433.71-353624.8 20260810.1741 12.16CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461228.76784715 07.07.2026 06:25:31.994 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
First image: 2461228.76784715 07.07.2026 06:25:31.994 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Last image: 2461262.67432969 10.08.2026 04:10:52.085 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_231543_TTUQ1b1x1_1474660_DZjYyn6T/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 5
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.52
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 7 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 4752
Objects passed selection criteria: 4747
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 4338.5
Average stars matched: 4140.5 (95.4362 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 231316 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Aug 6 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-190-gdf2934b0
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Aug 9 23:18:23 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461228.76784715 07.07.2026 06:25:31.994 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
First image: 2461228.76784715 07.07.2026 06:25:31.994 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Last image: 2461262.67432969 10.08.2026 04:10:52.085 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_231543_TTUQ1b1x1_1474660_DZjYyn6T/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 30
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.17
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 47 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 41487
Objects passed selection criteria: 41422
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 35243.8
Average stars matched: 33484 (95.0069 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 264480 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Aug 6 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-190-gdf2934b0
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Aug 9 23:21:07 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_231543_TTUQ1b1x1_1474660_DZjYyn6T/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0106.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_231543_TTUQ1b1x1_1474660_DZjYyn6T/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_231543_TTUQ1b1x1_1474660_DZjYyn6T/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0106.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_231543_TTUQ1b1x1_1474660_DZjYyn6T/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461262.67380998
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits'
wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits'
wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0106.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0106.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0106.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0106.fits'
wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Image size: 937.5'x625.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:49:25.124 -34:01:06.26 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0106.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0106.fits
Image size: 940.9'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:49:43.300 -33:59:37.47 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:49:25.124 -34:01:06.26
Second-epoch image center 19:49:43.300 -33:59:37.47
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0675 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits
Image size: 940.9'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:49:40.788 -33:59:46.22 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:49:25.124 -34:01:06.26
Second-epoch image center 19:49:40.788 -33:59:46.22
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0585 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 19:49:43.300 -33:59:37.47
Second-epoch second image center 19:49:40.788 -33:59:46.22
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00901 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rQ1srmOWsU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Q5nyGmQgzn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_231543_TTUQ1b1x1_1474660_DZjYyn6T/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0106.fits &> /tmp/tmp.hMIZ2dN0o7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_231543_TTUQ1b1x1_1474660_DZjYyn6T/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0106.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_231543_TTUQ1b1x1_1474660_DZjYyn6T/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nSMFrDR5hw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_231543_TTUQ1b1x1_1474660_DZjYyn6T/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 4697 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 287.4882 to 307.3652 deg, Dec -39.2783 to -28.5409 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 287.4882 to 307.3652 deg, Dec -39.2783 to -28.5409 deg
Loaded 9498 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3848 out of 3914 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3914 out of 4697 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.312600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.312600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.52
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 13.79
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 13.79
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 4697 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 287.4882 to 307.3652 deg, Dec -39.2783 to -28.5409 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 287.4882 to 307.3652 deg, Dec -39.2783 to -28.5409 deg
Loaded 9498 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3848 out of 3914 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3914 out of 4697 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 5190 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 287.4883 to 307.3652 deg, Dec -39.2653 to -28.4593 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 287.4883 to 307.3652 deg, Dec -39.2653 to -28.4593 deg
Loaded 9578 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4228 out of 4314 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4314 out of 5190 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 5 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
2.2 pix Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
3.6 pix fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0106.fits
3.6 pix fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
13.8 mag. Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
13.9 mag. Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
13.3 mag. fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0106.fits
13.3 mag. fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.3 (SNR ) 10.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.rQ1srmOWsU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_231543_TTUQ1b1x1_1474660_DZjYyn6T/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=342, bad_region=0, passed=4697
Got 4697 stars (including 4352 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4697 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4245 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4226 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4226 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4226 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4697 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4242 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4224 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4697 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4224 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4697 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Excluding outliers - 4224 stars left (next iteration limit 4648)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits N_match=4224 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.533 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.452 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.577 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.605 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.523 n_q1=983 n_q2=917 n_q3=1399 n_q4=925 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.135
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits -region wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Q5nyGmQgzn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_231543_TTUQ1b1x1_1474660_DZjYyn6T/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=358, bad_region=0, passed=5190
Got 5190 stars (including 4828 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5190 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4713 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4687 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4688 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4687 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5190 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4711 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4686 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5190 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4686 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5190 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4686 stars left (next iteration limit 5155)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits N_match=4686 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.475 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.424 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.579 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.480 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.507 n_q1=1134 n_q2=1001 n_q3=1518 n_q4=1033 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.218
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits -region wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.hMIZ2dN0o7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_231543_TTUQ1b1x1_1474660_DZjYyn6T/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_231543_TTUQ1b1x1_1474660_DZjYyn6T/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0106.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_231543_TTUQ1b1x1_1474660_DZjYyn6T/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0106.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_231543_TTUQ1b1x1_1474660_DZjYyn6T/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0106.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_231543_TTUQ1b1x1_1474660_DZjYyn6T/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0106.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_231543_TTUQ1b1x1_1474660_DZjYyn6T/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0106.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_231543_TTUQ1b1x1_1474660_DZjYyn6T/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0106.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0106.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0106.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0106.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0106.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0106.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0106.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0106.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_231543_TTUQ1b1x1_1474660_DZjYyn6T/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0106.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0106.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=203, bad_region=0, passed=3800
Got 3800 stars (including 3592 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0106.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3800 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 312 (Dec -39.4 to -28.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3513 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3494 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3494 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3494 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3800 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 312 (Dec -39.4 to -28.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3512 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3494 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3800 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3494 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3800 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 3494 stars left (next iteration limit 3843)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3494 robust_rms=9.494 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=17.526 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3494 robust_rms=0.556 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.659 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3494 robust_rms=0.472 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.613 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3494 robust_rms_before=0.962 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.495 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.472 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.637 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.613
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.637 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0106.fits N_match=3494 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.465 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.585 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.593 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.363 n_q1=771 n_q2=626 n_q3=1289 n_q4=808 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.274
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0106.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0106.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_231543_TTUQ1b1x1_1474660_DZjYyn6T/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0106.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0106.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0106.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.nSMFrDR5hw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_231543_TTUQ1b1x1_1474660_DZjYyn6T/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_231543_TTUQ1b1x1_1474660_DZjYyn6T/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_231543_TTUQ1b1x1_1474660_DZjYyn6T/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_231543_TTUQ1b1x1_1474660_DZjYyn6T/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_231543_TTUQ1b1x1_1474660_DZjYyn6T/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_231543_TTUQ1b1x1_1474660_DZjYyn6T/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_231543_TTUQ1b1x1_1474660_DZjYyn6T/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_231543_TTUQ1b1x1_1474660_DZjYyn6T/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=198, bad_region=0, passed=3789
Got 3789 stars (including 3587 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3789 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 312 (Dec -39.4 to -28.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3507 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3487 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3487 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3487 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3789 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 312 (Dec -39.4 to -28.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3506 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3488 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3789 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3488 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3789 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 3488 stars left (next iteration limit 3835)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3488 robust_rms=9.205 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=17.385 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3488 robust_rms=0.590 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.746 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3488 robust_rms=0.466 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.638 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3488 robust_rms_before=0.974 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.483 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.466 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.635 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.638
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.635 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits N_match=3488 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.472 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.631 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.535 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.349 n_q1=768 n_q2=617 n_q3=1288 n_q4=815 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.338
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_231543_TTUQ1b1x1_1474660_DZjYyn6T/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits sigma_overall=0.533 worst_q_ratio=1.135
ref2=Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits sigma_overall=0.475 worst_q_ratio=1.218
new1=fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0106.fits sigma_overall=0.465 worst_q_ratio=1.274
new2=fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits sigma_overall=0.472 worst_q_ratio=1.338
reference average sigma_overall=0.504 worst_q_ratio=1.1765
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229_astrometric_residuals.png (4224 matched stars from wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.49 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211_astrometric_residuals.png (4686 matched stars from wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.43 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0106_astrometric_residuals.png (3494 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0106.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.43 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107_astrometric_residuals.png (3488 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.43 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0106.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0106.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_231543_TTUQ1b1x1_1474660_DZjYyn6T/wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0106.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_231543_TTUQ1b1x1_1474660_DZjYyn6T/wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sgr-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 19:32:05.71 -29:30:36.8: 11.32 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 19:32:05.71 -29:30:36.8: 11.23 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.27 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:32:05.71 -29:30:36.8: ref_mag=11.27 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.9301 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 2s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20698_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107
The candidate 20698_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:48:42.03 -36:08:52.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20743_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107
The candidate 20743_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:09:38.90 -29:25:32.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20747_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107
The candidate 20747_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03078_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107
The candidate 03078_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:19:52.58 -31:42:55.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03227_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107
The candidate 03227_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:21:07.31 -31:23:51.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 3s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Sgr-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_231543_TTUQ1b1x1_1474660_DZjYyn6T/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0106.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_231543_TTUQ1b1x1_1474660_DZjYyn6T/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_231543_TTUQ1b1x1_1474660_DZjYyn6T/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0106.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_231543_TTUQ1b1x1_1474660_DZjYyn6T/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0106.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0106.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Image size: 937.5'x625.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:49:25.124 -34:01:06.26 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0106.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0106.fits
Image size: 940.9'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:49:43.300 -33:59:37.47 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:49:25.124 -34:01:06.26
Second-epoch image center 19:49:43.300 -33:59:37.47
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0675 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits
Image size: 940.9'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:49:40.788 -33:59:46.22 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:49:25.124 -34:01:06.26
Second-epoch image center 19:49:40.788 -33:59:46.22
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0585 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 19:49:43.300 -33:59:37.47
Second-epoch second image center 19:49:40.788 -33:59:46.22
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00901 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Rz2S2IJVBo
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zHkdGbDGVz
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_231543_TTUQ1b1x1_1474660_DZjYyn6T/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0106.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Kv4X0O9l1y
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_231543_TTUQ1b1x1_1474660_DZjYyn6T/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0106.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_231543_TTUQ1b1x1_1474660_DZjYyn6T/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits &> /tmp/tmp.QDjSy6MVV3
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_231543_TTUQ1b1x1_1474660_DZjYyn6T/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 44272 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 287.3598 to 307.3652 deg, Dec -39.2932 to -28.4731 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 287.3598 to 307.3652 deg, Dec -39.2932 to -28.4731 deg
Loaded 9674 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7462 out of 7948 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7948 out of 44272 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.110400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.110400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.17
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 13.94
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 13.94
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 44272 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 287.3598 to 307.3652 deg, Dec -39.2932 to -28.4731 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 287.3598 to 307.3652 deg, Dec -39.2932 to -28.4731 deg
Loaded 9674 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7462 out of 7948 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7948 out of 44272 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 46244 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 287.4021 to 307.3750 deg, Dec -39.2653 to -28.4527 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 287.4021 to 307.3750 deg, Dec -39.2653 to -28.4527 deg
Loaded 9650 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7461 out of 7928 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7928 out of 46244 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 29 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
2.1 pix Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
3.3 pix fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0106.fits
3.3 pix fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
13.9 mag. Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
14.0 mag. Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
13.4 mag. fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0106.fits
13.4 mag. fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.4 (SNR ) 12.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.Rz2S2IJVBo (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_231543_TTUQ1b1x1_1474660_DZjYyn6T/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=1818, bad_region=1, passed=44261
Got 44261 stars (including 42383 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 44261 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4887 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4862 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4862 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4862 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44261 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4886 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4862 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44261 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4862 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44261 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4862 stars left (next iteration limit 5348)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits N_match=4862 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.519 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.448 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.540 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.598 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.510 n_q1=1178 n_q2=1059 n_q3=1503 n_q4=1122 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.152
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits -region wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.zHkdGbDGVz (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_231543_TTUQ1b1x1_1474660_DZjYyn6T/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=1811, bad_region=0, passed=46239
Got 46239 stars (including 44347 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 46239 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4885 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4863 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4865 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4863 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46239 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4884 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46239 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46239 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 4864 stars left (next iteration limit 5349)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits N_match=4864 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.468 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.414 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.545 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.481 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.504 n_q1=1179 n_q2=970 n_q3=1614 n_q4=1101 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.164
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits -region wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Kv4X0O9l1y (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_231543_TTUQ1b1x1_1474660_DZjYyn6T/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_231543_TTUQ1b1x1_1474660_DZjYyn6T/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0106.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_231543_TTUQ1b1x1_1474660_DZjYyn6T/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0106.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_231543_TTUQ1b1x1_1474660_DZjYyn6T/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0106.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_231543_TTUQ1b1x1_1474660_DZjYyn6T/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0106.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_231543_TTUQ1b1x1_1474660_DZjYyn6T/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0106.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_231543_TTUQ1b1x1_1474660_DZjYyn6T/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0106.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0106.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0106.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0106.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0106.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0106.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0106.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0106.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_231543_TTUQ1b1x1_1474660_DZjYyn6T/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0106.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0106.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=860, bad_region=2, passed=25845
Got 25845 stars (including 24944 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0106.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 25845 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 312 (Dec -39.4 to -28.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4888 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4859 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4859 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4859 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25845 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 312 (Dec -39.4 to -28.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4887 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25845 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25845 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 4860 stars left (next iteration limit 5344)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0106.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0106.fits N_match=4860 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.477 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.647 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.581 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.426 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.380 n_q1=1051 n_q2=876 n_q3=1833 n_q4=1100 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.355
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0106.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0106.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_231543_TTUQ1b1x1_1474660_DZjYyn6T/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0106.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0106.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0106.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.QDjSy6MVV3 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_231543_TTUQ1b1x1_1474660_DZjYyn6T/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_231543_TTUQ1b1x1_1474660_DZjYyn6T/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_231543_TTUQ1b1x1_1474660_DZjYyn6T/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_231543_TTUQ1b1x1_1474660_DZjYyn6T/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_231543_TTUQ1b1x1_1474660_DZjYyn6T/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_231543_TTUQ1b1x1_1474660_DZjYyn6T/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_231543_TTUQ1b1x1_1474660_DZjYyn6T/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_231543_TTUQ1b1x1_1474660_DZjYyn6T/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=883, bad_region=2, passed=25758
Got 25758 stars (including 24841 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 25758 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 312 (Dec -39.4 to -28.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4888 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4855 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25758 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 312 (Dec -39.4 to -28.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4888 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25758 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25758 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 4855 stars left (next iteration limit 5340)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits N_match=4855 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.476 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.686 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.573 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.425 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.365 n_q1=1043 n_q2=881 n_q3=1834 n_q4=1097 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.443
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_231543_TTUQ1b1x1_1474660_DZjYyn6T/fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0106.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_231543_TTUQ1b1x1_1474660_DZjYyn6T/wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0106.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_231543_TTUQ1b1x1_1474660_DZjYyn6T/wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sgr-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 20:24:24.23 -29:29:25.6: 12.18 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 19:17:11.15 -28:46:57.0: 10.48 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 19:20:24.91 -38:13:47.5: 14.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 19:23:38.49 -30:14:54.3: 11.33 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 19:49:50.41 -35:04:33.9: 14.55 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 19:19:36.58 -28:36:53.3: 12.42 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 20:24:43.51 -29:58:33.1: 13.10 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 19:31:40.42 -29:23:07.9: 12.59 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 19:15:58.44 -29:02:09.6: 13.45 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 19:49:50.41 -35:04:33.9: 14.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 20:24:24.23 -29:29:25.6: 12.42 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 19:23:38.49 -30:14:54.3: 11.37 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 19:19:36.58 -28:36:53.3: 12.46 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 19:20:24.91 -38:13:47.5: 14.27 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.29 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.35 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:24:24.23 -29:29:25.6: ref_mag=12.29 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.4561 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 19:17:11.15 -28:46:57.0: 10.49 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.44 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:23:38.49 -30:14:54.3: ref_mag=11.35 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.3517 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:19:36.58 -28:36:53.3: ref_mag=12.44 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.5231 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.48 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:17:11.15 -28:46:57.0: ref_mag=10.48 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.7149 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 20:24:43.51 -29:58:33.1: 13.15 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.13 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 19:31:40.42 -29:23:07.9: 12.67 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:24:43.51 -29:58:33.1: ref_mag=13.13 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=12.8147 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.63 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 19:15:58.44 -29:02:09.6: 13.39 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:31:40.42 -29:23:07.9: ref_mag=12.63 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.7415 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.42 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:15:58.44 -29:02:09.6: ref_mag=13.42 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.1556 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 19:19:22.50 -28:38:41.1: 13.67 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 19:19:22.50 -28:38:41.1: 13.50 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.56 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:19:22.50 -28:38:41.1: ref_mag=13.56 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.2522 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_01-25-31_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 19:34:33.79 -35:36:25.2: 13.12 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_00-50-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0211.fits at 19:34:33.79 -35:36:25.2: 13.03 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.07 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:34:33.79 -35:36:25.2: ref_mag=13.07 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=12.1652 delta=0.90 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out11666.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out56335.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out56418.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 11s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55872_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107
The candidate 55872_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55878_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107
The candidate 55878_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:37:25.23 -30:54:41.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55879_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107
The candidate 55879_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56060_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107
The candidate 56060_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56157_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107
The candidate 56157_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:23:44.21 -28:41:07.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56335_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107
Preparing report for the candidate 56335_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56418_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107
Preparing report for the candidate 56418_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56421_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107
The candidate 56421_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56507_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107
The candidate 56507_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:29:21.46 -29:41:52.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56516_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107
The candidate 56516_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:42:17.23 -37:35:24.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56525_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107
The candidate 56525_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56670_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107
The candidate 56670_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56678_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107
The candidate 56678_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:33:29.06 -29:12:49.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56679_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107
The candidate 56679_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56696_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107
The candidate 56696_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56768_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107
The candidate 56768_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56790_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107
The candidate 56790_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:17:02.77 -29:09:55.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56847_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107
The candidate 56847_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:44:59.48 -31:14:14.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22315_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107
The candidate 22315_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:42:19.40 -33:18:40.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29002_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107
The candidate 29002_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:10:28.62 -32:36:42.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28947_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107
The candidate 28947_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:36:10.41 -32:36:40.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02972_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107
The candidate 02972_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:29:29.84 -38:05:29.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52235_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107
The candidate 52235_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:42:50.21 -34:30:33.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11666_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107
Preparing report for the candidate 11666_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50395_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107
The candidate 50395_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:21:22.82 -29:30:51.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01505_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107
The candidate 01505_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:27:21.60 -38:34:10.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09546_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107
The candidate 09546_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:48:42.00 -36:08:51.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 41488_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107
The candidate 41488_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:16:12.39 -31:16:38.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 42596_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107
The candidate 42596_fd_Sgr-07-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_23-10-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0107 did not pass the final checks