This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_213035_TTUQ1b1x1_917654_Di0AmNoA
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 10.1038 2461262.6038 9.39 18:45:14.82 -23:59:04.1
10.71562 -9.40370 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 10.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.8 Flora 1 0 1 9.8 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits at 18:45:14.82 -23:59:04.1: 14.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 18:45:14.82 -23:59:04.1: 14.44 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461262.6038,9.39,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260810.1038 9.39CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 10.1038 2461262.6038 11.84 18:10:48.22 -26:56:15.3
4.51154 -3.82050 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 6.5" and 10.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 6" ASAS J181047-2656.2
Type: SR|EC|ESD
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
9.216 Ic Y 0.366 Ic 2453005.10000 255.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits at 18:10:48.22 -26:56:15.3: 12.65 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 18:10:48.22 -26:56:15.3: 12.78 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.70 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J181047-2656.2,2461262.6038,11.84,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J181047-2656.2 20260810.1038 11.84CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 10.1038 2461262.6038 11.71 18:43:44.25 -28:38:44.8
6.28620 -11.09040 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.0" and 10.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.128 Nemesis -2 3 4 11.9 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits at 18:43:44.25 -28:38:44.8: 14.54 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 18:43:44.25 -28:38:44.8: 14.37 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461262.6038,11.71,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260810.1038 11.71CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 10.1038 2461262.6038 12.15 18:24:13.52 -27:30:42.4
5.40267 -6.72641 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 9.6 pix
The object was found in VSX21" Gaia DR3 4051904930594899712
Type:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
19.350 G 19.580 G 4.971110000000
NOTE: the measured brightness disagrees with the variable-star record above, but is consistent with the asteroid identification below - so this is likely the asteroid rather than an outburst of the variable.
The object was found in astcheck.37 Fides -0 0 0 12.1 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits at 18:24:13.52 -27:30:42.4: 14.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 18:24:13.52 -27:30:42.4: 14.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 4051904930594899712,2461262.6038,12.15,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 4051904930594899712 20260810.1038 12.15CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 10.1038 2461262.6038 12.73 18:36:17.19 -23:33:47.1
10.18933 -7.37662 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.8" and 9.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 6" Gaia DR3 4077615085893510528
Type: E
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
15.820 G 15.930 G 3.558570000000 K
NOTE: the measured brightness disagrees with the variable-star record above, but is consistent with the asteroid identification below - so this is likely the asteroid rather than an outburst of the variable.
The object was found in astcheck.407 Arachne 1 1 2 13.2 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits at 18:36:17.19 -23:33:47.1: 14.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 18:36:17.19 -23:33:47.1: 14.45 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.45 +/- 0.32
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 4077615085893510528,2461262.6038,12.73,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 4077615085893510528 20260810.1038 12.73CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 10.1038 2461262.6038 11.93 18:17:00.34 -28:23:01.2
3.88446 -5.71428 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.1" and 9.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" V6319 Sgr
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.900 V < 14.600 V 2457933.00000 223.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits at 18:17:00.34 -28:23:01.2: 13.09 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 18:17:00.34 -28:23:01.2: 12.72 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.86 +/- 0.06
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V6319 Sgr,2461262.6038,11.93,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V6319 Sgr 20260810.1038 11.93CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 10.1038 2461262.6038 10.09 17:50:31.33 -27:51:57.6
1.47325 -0.37005 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 10.3 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" [HHR2012] J175031.3-275156
Type: VAR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
10.670 r Y 0.300 r M2III
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits at 17:50:31.33 -27:51:57.6: 11.14 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 17:50:31.33 -27:51:57.6: 10.94 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.04 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
[HHR2012] J175031.3-275156,2461262.6038,10.09,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
[HHR2012] J175031.3-275156 20260810.1038 10.09CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461153.96379726 23.04.2026 11:07:42.083 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
First image: 2461153.96379726 23.04.2026 11:07:42.083 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
Last image: 2461262.60419664 10.08.2026 02:29:52.590 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_213035_TTUQ1b1x1_917654_Di0AmNoA/fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 9
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.47
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 10926
Objects passed selection criteria: 10917
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 9505
Average stars matched: 9336.5 (98.2272 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 237596 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Aug 6 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-190-gdf2934b0
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Aug 9 21:33:33 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461153.96379726 23.04.2026 11:07:42.083 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
First image: 2461153.96379726 23.04.2026 11:07:42.083 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
Last image: 2461262.60419664 10.08.2026 02:29:52.590 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_213035_TTUQ1b1x1_917654_Di0AmNoA/fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 182
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.11
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 41 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 149451
Objects passed selection criteria: 149207
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 123158
Average stars matched: 118549 (96.2577 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 561484 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Aug 6 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-190-gdf2934b0
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Aug 9 21:34:59 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_213035_TTUQ1b1x1_917654_Di0AmNoA/fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-28-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_213035_TTUQ1b1x1_917654_Di0AmNoA/fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_213035_TTUQ1b1x1_917654_Di0AmNoA/fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-28-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_213035_TTUQ1b1x1_917654_Di0AmNoA/fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461262.60342291
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits'
wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits'
wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-28-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-28-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-28-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-28-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits'
wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:14:18.095 -25:59:29.96 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-28-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-28-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
Image size: 940.7'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:14:38.591 -25:59:26.87 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 18:14:18.095 -25:59:29.96
Second-epoch image center 18:14:38.591 -25:59:26.87
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0768 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Image size: 940.7'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:14:41.745 -25:58:44.93 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 18:14:18.095 -25:59:29.96
Second-epoch image center 18:14:41.745 -25:58:44.93
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0895 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 18:14:38.591 -25:59:26.87
Second-epoch second image center 18:14:41.745 -25:58:44.93
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01659 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ShQet01izn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits &> /tmp/tmp.mbTPElnXsw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_213035_TTUQ1b1x1_917654_Di0AmNoA/fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-28-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits &> /tmp/tmp.y4fy4kQDv7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_213035_TTUQ1b1x1_917654_Di0AmNoA/fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-28-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_213035_TTUQ1b1x1_917654_Di0AmNoA/fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NPdpQKYnPX
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_213035_TTUQ1b1x1_917654_Di0AmNoA/fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits and wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits and wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits and wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 13386 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 264.1563 to 282.3699 deg, Dec -31.5259 to -20.0842 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 264.1563 to 282.3699 deg, Dec -31.5259 to -20.0842 deg
Loaded 20390 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9648 out of 10098 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10098 out of 13386 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.508000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.508000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.47
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.04
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.04
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 13386 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 264.1563 to 282.3699 deg, Dec -31.5259 to -20.0842 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 264.1563 to 282.3699 deg, Dec -31.5259 to -20.0842 deg
Loaded 20390 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9648 out of 10098 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10098 out of 13386 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 11384 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 264.5793 to 282.6797 deg, Dec -31.2667 to -20.5444 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 264.5793 to 282.6797 deg, Dec -31.2667 to -20.5444 deg
Loaded 19144 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8594 out of 8954 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8954 out of 11384 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 9 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
2.3 pix Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
3.2 pix fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-28-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
3.2 pix fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.0 mag. Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
13.9 mag. Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
13.1 mag. fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-28-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
13.2 mag. fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.1 (SNR ) 10.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.ShQet01izn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_213035_TTUQ1b1x1_917654_Di0AmNoA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1034, bad_region=0, passed=13386
Got 13386 stars (including 12341 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13386 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4936 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4782 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4784 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4782 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13386 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4784 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13386 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4783 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13386 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Excluding outliers - 4783 stars left (next iteration limit 5260)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits N_match=4783 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.537 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.458 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.520 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.495 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.613 n_q1=1078 n_q2=1068 n_q3=1215 n_q4=1422 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.141
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits -region wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.mbTPElnXsw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_213035_TTUQ1b1x1_917654_Di0AmNoA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=928, bad_region=0, passed=11384
Got 11384 stars (including 10450 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11384 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013025 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010420 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4774 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4777 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4774 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11384 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.69"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4774 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11384 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.73"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4773 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11384 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.78"
Excluding outliers - 4773 stars left (next iteration limit 5251)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits N_match=4773 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.684 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.592 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.771 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.704 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.780 n_q1=1590 n_q2=1083 n_q3=1031 n_q4=1069 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.141
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits -region wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.y4fy4kQDv7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_213035_TTUQ1b1x1_917654_Di0AmNoA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_213035_TTUQ1b1x1_917654_Di0AmNoA/fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-28-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_213035_TTUQ1b1x1_917654_Di0AmNoA/fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-28-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_213035_TTUQ1b1x1_917654_Di0AmNoA/fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-28-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_213035_TTUQ1b1x1_917654_Di0AmNoA/fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-28-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_213035_TTUQ1b1x1_917654_Di0AmNoA/fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-28-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_213035_TTUQ1b1x1_917654_Di0AmNoA/fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-28-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-28-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-28-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-28-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-28-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-28-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-28-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-28-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_213035_TTUQ1b1x1_917654_Di0AmNoA/fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-28-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-28-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=446, bad_region=0, passed=6494
Got 6494 stars (including 6043 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-28-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6494 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013065 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010452 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4759 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4761 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.68"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4759 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6494 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.69"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4760 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6494 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.78"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4760 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6494 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.80"
Excluding outliers - 4760 stars left (next iteration limit 5234)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4760 robust_rms=8.130 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.884 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4760 robust_rms=0.552 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.682 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4760 robust_rms=0.490 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.663 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=4760 robust_rms_before=0.948 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.715 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.552 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.857 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.682
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-28-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-28-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
Image size: 940.7'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:14:38.588 -25:59:27.50 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 6494 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-28-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_213035_TTUQ1b1x1_917654_Di0AmNoA/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1025747.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 3, robust RMS 0.948 -> 0.552 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-28-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits N_match=4760 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.596 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.664 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.753 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.506 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.516 n_q1=1526 n_q2=1012 n_q3=1196 n_q4=1026 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.264
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-28-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-28-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_213035_TTUQ1b1x1_917654_Di0AmNoA/fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-28-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-28-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-28-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.NPdpQKYnPX (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_213035_TTUQ1b1x1_917654_Di0AmNoA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_213035_TTUQ1b1x1_917654_Di0AmNoA/fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_213035_TTUQ1b1x1_917654_Di0AmNoA/fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_213035_TTUQ1b1x1_917654_Di0AmNoA/fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_213035_TTUQ1b1x1_917654_Di0AmNoA/fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_213035_TTUQ1b1x1_917654_Di0AmNoA/fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_213035_TTUQ1b1x1_917654_Di0AmNoA/fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_213035_TTUQ1b1x1_917654_Di0AmNoA/fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=466, bad_region=0, passed=6965
Got 6965 stars (including 6495 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6965 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013065 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010452 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4925 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4756 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4761 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.68"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4756 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6965 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.68"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4760 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6965 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.77"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4759 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6965 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.80"
Excluding outliers - 4759 stars left (next iteration limit 5231)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4759 robust_rms=8.166 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.494 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4759 robust_rms=0.521 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.658 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4759 robust_rms=0.475 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.655 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=4759 robust_rms_before=0.933 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.708 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.521 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.911 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.658
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Image size: 940.7'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:14:41.739 -25:58:45.59 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 6965 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_213035_TTUQ1b1x1_917654_Di0AmNoA/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1025746.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 3, robust RMS 0.933 -> 0.521 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits N_match=4759 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.567 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.669 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.681 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.443 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.498 n_q1=1538 n_q2=1016 n_q3=1182 n_q4=1023 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.201
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_213035_TTUQ1b1x1_917654_Di0AmNoA/fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits sigma_overall=0.537 worst_q_ratio=1.141
ref2=Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits sigma_overall=0.684 worst_q_ratio=1.141
new1=fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-28-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits sigma_overall=0.596 worst_q_ratio=1.264
new2=fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits sigma_overall=0.567 worst_q_ratio=1.201
reference average sigma_overall=0.6105 worst_q_ratio=1.141
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332_astrometric_residuals.png (4783 matched stars from wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.53 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056_astrometric_residuals.png (4773 matched stars from wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.69 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-28-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004_astrometric_residuals.png (4760 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-28-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.46 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005_astrometric_residuals.png (4759 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.43 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-28-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-28-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_213035_TTUQ1b1x1_917654_Di0AmNoA/wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-28-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_213035_TTUQ1b1x1_917654_Di0AmNoA/wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits at 18:45:14.82 -23:59:04.1: 14.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 18:45:14.82 -23:59:04.1: 14.44 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20650.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 5s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20648_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 20648_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:36:23.35 -23:54:10.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20650_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
Preparing report for the candidate 20650_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20652_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 20652_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:28:22.08 -28:14:28.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20653_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 20653_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:30:57.25 -31:08:31.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20656_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 20656_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:33:25.78 -25:06:11.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20661_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 20661_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:51:21.67 -29:01:56.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20475_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 20475_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:51:03.77 -29:58:30.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20450_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 20450_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:58.34 -30:28:48.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20212_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 20212_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:41:32.43 -29:04:02.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 6s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
18:45:14.82 -23:59:04.1
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_213035_TTUQ1b1x1_917654_Di0AmNoA/fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-28-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_213035_TTUQ1b1x1_917654_Di0AmNoA/fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_213035_TTUQ1b1x1_917654_Di0AmNoA/fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-28-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_213035_TTUQ1b1x1_917654_Di0AmNoA/fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-28-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-28-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:14:18.095 -25:59:29.96 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-28-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-28-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
Image size: 940.7'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:14:38.591 -25:59:26.87 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 18:14:18.095 -25:59:29.96
Second-epoch image center 18:14:38.591 -25:59:26.87
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0768 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Image size: 940.7'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:14:41.745 -25:58:44.93 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 18:14:18.095 -25:59:29.96
Second-epoch image center 18:14:41.745 -25:58:44.93
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0895 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 18:14:38.591 -25:59:26.87
Second-epoch second image center 18:14:41.745 -25:58:44.93
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01659 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits &> /tmp/tmp.muXbLsKhwc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits &> /tmp/tmp.OC1TEd7GSQ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_213035_TTUQ1b1x1_917654_Di0AmNoA/fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-28-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DIwF1XKinz
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_213035_TTUQ1b1x1_917654_Di0AmNoA/fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-28-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_213035_TTUQ1b1x1_917654_Di0AmNoA/fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits &> /tmp/tmp.APBaV0Kce6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_213035_TTUQ1b1x1_917654_Di0AmNoA/fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits and wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits and wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits and wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 189904 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 264.0767 to 282.3749 deg, Dec -31.5269 to -20.0180 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 264.0767 to 282.3749 deg, Dec -31.5269 to -20.0180 deg
Loaded 20545 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 13761 out of 17150 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 17150 out of 189904 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.283400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.283400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.11
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.17
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.17
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 189904 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 264.0767 to 282.3749 deg, Dec -31.5269 to -20.0180 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 264.0767 to 282.3749 deg, Dec -31.5269 to -20.0180 deg
Loaded 20545 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 13761 out of 17150 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 17150 out of 189904 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits (aperture=4.4)
Read 164758 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 264.5411 to 282.7371 deg, Dec -31.2682 to -20.5218 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 264.5411 to 282.7371 deg, Dec -31.2682 to -20.5218 deg
Loaded 19228 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 13933 out of 16959 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16959 out of 164758 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (aperture=4.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 172 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
2.1 pix Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
2.9 pix fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-28-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
2.9 pix fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.2 mag. Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
14.0 mag. Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
13.3 mag. fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-28-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
13.3 mag. fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.3 (SNR ) 12.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.muXbLsKhwc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_213035_TTUQ1b1x1_917654_Di0AmNoA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=25, blended=19348, bad_region=5, passed=189879
Got 189879 stars (including 170303 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 189879 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4792 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4793 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4792 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 189879 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4794 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 189879 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4794 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 189879 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Excluding outliers - 4794 stars left (next iteration limit 5271)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits N_match=4794 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.508 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.468 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.501 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.484 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.571 n_q1=1063 n_q2=1078 n_q3=1271 n_q4=1382 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.125
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits -region wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.OC1TEd7GSQ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_213035_TTUQ1b1x1_917654_Di0AmNoA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=15659, bad_region=1, passed=164737
Got 164737 stars (including 148912 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 164737 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013025 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010420 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4797 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4797 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4796 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 164736 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4925 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4799 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 164736 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4799 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 164736 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.72"
Excluding outliers - 4799 stars left (next iteration limit 5275)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits N_match=4799 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.693 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.583 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.788 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.710 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.784 n_q1=1578 n_q2=1125 n_q3=993 n_q4=1103 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.137
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits -region wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.DIwF1XKinz (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_213035_TTUQ1b1x1_917654_Di0AmNoA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_213035_TTUQ1b1x1_917654_Di0AmNoA/fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-28-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_213035_TTUQ1b1x1_917654_Di0AmNoA/fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-28-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_213035_TTUQ1b1x1_917654_Di0AmNoA/fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-28-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_213035_TTUQ1b1x1_917654_Di0AmNoA/fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-28-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_213035_TTUQ1b1x1_917654_Di0AmNoA/fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-28-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_213035_TTUQ1b1x1_917654_Di0AmNoA/fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-28-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-28-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-28-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-28-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-28-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-28-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-28-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-28-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_213035_TTUQ1b1x1_917654_Di0AmNoA/fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-28-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-28-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=4183, bad_region=0, passed=67771
Got 67771 stars (including 63527 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-28-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 67771 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013065 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010452 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4920 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4776 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4779 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4776 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 67771 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4922 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4780 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 67771 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4780 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 67771 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.71"
Excluding outliers - 4780 stars left (next iteration limit 5253)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-28-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-28-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits N_match=4780 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.620 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.728 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.796 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.482 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.500 n_q1=1362 n_q2=1003 n_q3=1298 n_q4=1117 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.283
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-28-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-28-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_213035_TTUQ1b1x1_917654_Di0AmNoA/fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-28-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-28-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-28-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.APBaV0Kce6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_213035_TTUQ1b1x1_917654_Di0AmNoA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_213035_TTUQ1b1x1_917654_Di0AmNoA/fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_213035_TTUQ1b1x1_917654_Di0AmNoA/fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_213035_TTUQ1b1x1_917654_Di0AmNoA/fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_213035_TTUQ1b1x1_917654_Di0AmNoA/fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_213035_TTUQ1b1x1_917654_Di0AmNoA/fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_213035_TTUQ1b1x1_917654_Di0AmNoA/fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_213035_TTUQ1b1x1_917654_Di0AmNoA/fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=4820, bad_region=0, passed=73089
Got 73089 stars (including 68193 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 73089 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013065 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010452 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4920 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4773 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4775 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4772 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 73089 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4922 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4775 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 73089 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4775 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 73089 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.72"
Excluding outliers - 4775 stars left (next iteration limit 5249)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits N_match=4775 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.598 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.727 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.726 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.446 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.491 n_q1=1361 n_q2=997 n_q3=1302 n_q4=1115 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.215
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_213035_TTUQ1b1x1_917654_Di0AmNoA/fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-28-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_213035_TTUQ1b1x1_917654_Di0AmNoA/wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-28-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_213035_TTUQ1b1x1_917654_Di0AmNoA/wcs_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits at 18:10:32.11 -28:02:34.4: 12.80 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits at 17:57:25.04 -28:20:31.4: 12.45 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits at 18:11:35.57 -30:51:31.3: 12.41 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits at 18:10:19.64 -26:22:22.5: 12.64 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits at 18:04:47.20 -27:22:34.8: 13.18 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits at 18:28:15.60 -21:56:53.5: 13.22 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits at 18:09:42.08 -25:31:10.3: 12.53 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits at 18:23:43.87 -26:31:40.3: 12.79 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits at 18:12:44.50 -29:17:13.7: 12.08 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits at 17:58:06.57 -24:40:46.5: 12.39 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 18:10:19.64 -26:22:22.5: 12.57 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 18:11:35.57 -30:51:31.3: 12.29 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 18:28:15.60 -21:56:53.5: 13.17 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 17:57:25.04 -28:20:31.4: 12.45 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 18:23:43.87 -26:31:40.3: 12.70 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 18:09:42.08 -25:31:10.3: 12.52 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 18:10:32.11 -28:02:34.4: 12.73 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 18:04:47.20 -27:22:34.8: 13.36 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.36 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.61 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.45 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.75 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.20 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:11:35.57 -30:51:31.3: ref_mag=12.36 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.2840 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.77 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:57:25.04 -28:20:31.4: ref_mag=12.45 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.4520 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:10:19.64 -26:22:22.5: ref_mag=12.61 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.3801 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.24 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:23:43.87 -26:31:40.3: ref_mag=12.75 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.6763 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.53 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:28:15.60 -21:56:53.5: ref_mag=13.20 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.0239 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:10:32.11 -28:02:34.4: ref_mag=12.77 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.6028 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:04:47.20 -27:22:34.8: ref_mag=13.24 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=12.5910 delta=0.65 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:09:42.08 -25:31:10.3: ref_mag=12.53 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.7147 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 18:12:44.50 -29:17:13.7: 11.96 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.03 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:12:44.50 -29:17:13.7: ref_mag=12.03 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.2270 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 17:58:06.57 -24:40:46.5: 12.36 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.38 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:58:06.57 -24:40:46.5: ref_mag=12.38 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.2903 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits at 18:22:42.86 -27:10:53.3: 13.63 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits at 17:42:26.97 -30:10:08.4: 11.95 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits at 18:01:30.36 -28:55:32.3: 12.25 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits at 18:02:52.77 -26:55:12.2: 12.33 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits at 18:10:34.35 -27:39:50.1: 12.15 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits at 18:10:40.99 -28:23:52.1: 11.87 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits at 18:16:01.81 -30:44:04.4: 11.81 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits at 18:10:48.22 -26:56:15.3: 12.65 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 18:22:42.86 -27:10:53.3: 13.58 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits at 18:08:54.38 -28:02:25.3: 11.57 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.61 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:22:42.86 -27:10:53.3: ref_mag=13.61 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=12.2055 delta=1.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 18:01:30.36 -28:55:32.3: 12.30 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 18:10:34.35 -27:39:50.1: 12.03 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 18:02:52.77 -26:55:12.2: 12.28 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.27 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 17:42:26.97 -30:10:08.4: 11.76 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:01:30.36 -28:55:32.3: ref_mag=12.27 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=11.9669 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.09 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.31 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.86 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:10:34.35 -27:39:50.1: ref_mag=12.09 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.9366 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:02:52.77 -26:55:12.2: ref_mag=12.31 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.3160 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:42:26.97 -30:10:08.4: ref_mag=11.86 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.0993 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 18:10:40.99 -28:23:52.1: 11.99 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.91 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:10:40.99 -28:23:52.1: ref_mag=11.91 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.0488 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 18:16:01.81 -30:44:04.4: 11.84 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 18:10:48.22 -26:56:15.3: 12.78 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.82 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:16:01.81 -30:44:04.4: ref_mag=11.82 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.8113 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.70 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:10:48.22 -26:56:15.3: ref_mag=12.70 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=11.7718 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 18:08:54.38 -28:02:25.3: 11.50 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.54 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:08:54.38 -28:02:25.3: ref_mag=11.54 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.5039 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits at 18:03:32.25 -24:25:05.1: 11.39 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 18:03:32.25 -24:25:05.1: 11.32 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.36 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:03:32.25 -24:25:05.1: ref_mag=11.36 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=11.2072 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits at 18:43:44.25 -28:38:44.8: 14.54 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 18:43:44.25 -28:38:44.8: 14.37 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits at 18:24:13.52 -27:30:42.4: 14.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits at 18:31:21.47 -23:17:51.6: 12.28 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 18:24:13.52 -27:30:42.4: 14.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 18:31:21.47 -23:17:51.6: 12.47 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.35 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:31:21.47 -23:17:51.6: ref_mag=12.35 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.3551 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits at 17:56:26.22 -23:22:57.6: 12.56 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 17:56:26.22 -23:22:57.6: 12.71 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.62 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:56:26.22 -23:22:57.6: ref_mag=12.62 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.5391 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits at 17:56:12.37 -25:39:44.7: 12.86 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 17:56:12.37 -25:39:44.7: 12.93 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.88 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:56:12.37 -25:39:44.7: ref_mag=12.88 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.6118 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits at 18:36:17.19 -23:33:47.1: 14.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 18:36:17.19 -23:33:47.1: 14.45 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.45 +/- 0.32
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:36:17.19 -23:33:47.1: ref_mag=14.45 +/- 0.32 new_mean_mag=12.7151 delta=1.74 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits at 18:06:56.75 -28:26:18.6: 12.55 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 18:06:56.75 -28:26:18.6: 12.56 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.55 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:06:56.75 -28:26:18.6: ref_mag=12.55 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=11.9016 delta=0.65 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits at 17:53:27.33 -29:00:00.7: 12.57 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits at 18:12:59.94 -30:10:46.7: 12.76 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits at 18:15:32.15 -25:41:41.0: 12.68 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 17:53:27.33 -29:00:00.7: 12.60 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.58 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:53:27.33 -29:00:00.7: ref_mag=12.58 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.0871 delta=0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 18:12:59.94 -30:10:46.7: 12.78 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.77 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:12:59.94 -30:10:46.7: ref_mag=12.77 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=12.0654 delta=0.70 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 18:15:32.15 -25:41:41.0: 12.67 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.68 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:15:32.15 -25:41:41.0: ref_mag=12.68 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.2585 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits at 18:17:00.34 -28:23:01.2: 13.09 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 18:17:00.34 -28:23:01.2: 12.72 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.86 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:17:00.34 -28:23:01.2: ref_mag=12.86 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=11.9212 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits at 17:39:53.56 -30:10:29.4: 12.43 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_06-07-42_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0332.fits at 17:50:31.33 -27:51:57.6: 11.14 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 17:39:53.56 -30:10:29.4: 12.24 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_00-30-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 17:50:31.33 -27:51:57.6: 10.94 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.34 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:39:53.56 -30:10:29.4: ref_mag=12.34 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.1288 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.04 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:50:31.33 -27:51:57.6: ref_mag=11.04 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.0810 delta=0.96 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out217723.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out147292.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out148218.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out217740.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out217803.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out217830.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out217920.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217669_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217669_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217677_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217677_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217679_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217679_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217688_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217688_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217696_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217696_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217697_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217697_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217703_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217703_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:14:38.44 -28:26:45.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217707_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217707_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217710_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217710_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217712_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217712_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217713_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217713_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217714_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217714_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217717_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217717_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:30:00.29 -25:22:34.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217720_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217720_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217721_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217721_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217723_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217723_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:22:42.86 -27:10:53.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.21, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.19)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.938 4052677715471929600 275.67704564126 -27.18137117264 13.0550 11.0136 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.938#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217728_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217728_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217729_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217729_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217732_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217732_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217733_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217733_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:59:07.68 -29:30:31.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217735_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217735_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217737_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217737_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217740_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
Preparing report for the candidate 217740_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217744_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217744_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217747_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217747_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:45:14.72 -23:59:04.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217759_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217759_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:32:07.64 -24:57:21.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217762_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217762_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:20:49.36 -29:48:16.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217764_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217764_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:04:11.36 -22:28:42.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217767_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217767_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217772_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217772_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:04:07.94 -22:29:29.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217773_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217773_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:47:33.33 -24:07:21.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217776_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217776_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:04:10.22 -22:28:18.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217777_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217777_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:17:36.63 -28:31:47.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217779_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217779_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:07:31.49 -30:58:34.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217782_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217782_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:37:41.20 -30:48:10.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217783_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217783_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:58:58.01 -30:14:57.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217784_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217784_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:20:26.77 -26:01:12.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217790_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217790_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:59:03.74 -30:13:21.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217792_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217792_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:44:57.40 -27:38:29.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217794_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217794_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:27:15.62 -22:58:04.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217795_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217795_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:23:12.63 -24:37:18.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217797_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217797_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:21:53.01 -30:18:28.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217799_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217799_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:52:55.86 -29:32:10.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217800_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217800_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:02:28.38 -26:55:52.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217801_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217801_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:17:48.03 -31:04:23.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217803_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
Preparing report for the candidate 217803_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217804_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217804_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:48:22.76 -26:58:43.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217807_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217807_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:36:39.82 -23:52:50.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217809_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217809_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:21:37.47 -24:55:59.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217813_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217813_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:58:44.64 -26:10:13.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217814_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217814_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:58.79 -22:22:25.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217815_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217815_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:08:44.92 -21:27:22.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217817_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217817_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:59:03.96 -22:30:55.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217818_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217818_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:28:05.97 -26:44:09.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217819_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217819_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217820_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217820_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:23:58.52 -29:51:44.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217823_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217823_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:19:34.20 -30:31:07.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217825_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217825_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:41:14.11 -24:02:01.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217828_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217828_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:26:13.98 -24:38:50.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217829_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217829_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:26:19.16 -29:28:12.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217830_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
Preparing report for the candidate 217830_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217831_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217831_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:08:18.37 -29:16:05.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217834_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217834_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:39:37.30 -25:02:16.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217835_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217835_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:22:05.15 -26:29:43.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217839_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217839_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:53:22.83 -25:08:42.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217840_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217840_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:23:51.53 -30:36:34.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217841_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217841_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217847_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217847_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:44:08.32 -29:11:56.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217848_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217848_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:37:10.24 -27:42:08.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217849_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217849_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:23:18.10 -26:10:37.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217850_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217850_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:05:01.75 -23:27:31.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217852_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217852_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:09:00.49 -21:23:20.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217856_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217856_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:35:51.89 -25:15:27.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217857_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217857_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217859_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217859_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:27:03.70 -28:32:16.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217860_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217860_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:13:47.54 -29:59:13.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217861_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217861_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:16:08.18 -28:49:03.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217862_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217862_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217863_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217863_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:31:37.55 -28:46:03.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217864_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217864_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:04:40.65 -27:36:31.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217865_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217865_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:17:28.81 -25:13:33.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217867_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217867_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:10:33.19 -30:44:32.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217869_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217869_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:13:40.27 -29:15:52.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217871_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217871_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:44:43.89 -23:34:41.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217873_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217873_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:19:36.03 -31:04:38.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217875_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217875_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:44:01.11 -30:01:41.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217877_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217877_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:36:42.25 -25:24:15.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217879_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217879_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:35:44.01 -27:40:44.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217882_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217882_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:12:28.54 -28:01:56.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217885_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217885_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217887_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217887_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:34:09.14 -24:44:48.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217893_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217893_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:29:41.36 -26:26:43.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217894_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217894_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:23:23.12 -26:37:29.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217896_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217896_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:24:39.63 -25:41:35.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217900_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217900_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:03:30.12 -22:59:51.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217901_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217901_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:44:43.94 -27:03:43.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217902_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217902_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:42:27.64 -21:53:07.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217903_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217903_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:28:20.82 -29:19:25.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217906_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217906_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:27:34.79 -23:15:59.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217907_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217907_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:25:59.01 -24:42:18.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217910_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217910_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:26:30.61 -28:10:19.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217912_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217912_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:30:28.33 -27:32:44.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217914_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217914_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:14:27.81 -27:49:54.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217915_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217915_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:26:51.40 -31:11:47.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217916_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217916_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:02:57.59 -28:11:51.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217919_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217919_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:41:03.22 -28:09:34.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217920_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
Preparing report for the candidate 217920_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217922_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217922_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:15:40.97 -30:58:44.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217926_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217926_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:30.41 -25:48:38.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217930_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217930_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:39:40.76 -24:55:00.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217931_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217931_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:53:16.51 -22:15:04.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217935_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217935_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:28:00.83 -27:40:24.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217944_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217944_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:32:12.20 -25:54:13.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217946_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217946_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:19:25.02 -28:36:49.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217950_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217950_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:30:22.41 -26:46:35.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217952_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217952_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:25:38.53 -26:31:49.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217953_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217953_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:23:11.51 -23:15:07.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217954_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 217954_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:17:42.27 -27:38:10.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126490_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 126490_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:23:34.69 -27:40:08.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46880_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 46880_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:33:50.13 -23:30:22.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 204778_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 204778_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:26:55.49 -25:40:46.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116039_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 116039_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:27:18.22 -27:09:40.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110696_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 110696_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:38:10.35 -26:58:21.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62953_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 62953_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:26:46.84 -24:15:45.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82887_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 82887_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:41:10.68 -25:29:13.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 212263_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 212263_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:39:24.17 -28:14:13.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143949_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 143949_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88075_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 88075_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:54:49.40 -25:05:43.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111516_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 111516_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:31:33.84 -26:57:40.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 210033_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 210033_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:37:29.08 -26:54:51.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27536_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 27536_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:02:58.03 -22:01:55.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168580_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 168580_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:26:03.65 -30:10:27.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117080_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 117080_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:39:53.95 -27:18:12.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 205221_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 205221_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:51:21.67 -29:01:57.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 204933_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 204933_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:04.38 -27:50:24.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 204721_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 204721_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:44:29.23 -23:19:38.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 204576_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 204576_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:32:50.08 -25:18:01.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 204536_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 204536_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:57.19 -28:06:24.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 204175_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 204175_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:53:44.98 -29:35:24.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 204126_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 204126_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:40:48.76 -28:37:39.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 202900_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 202900_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 202779_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 202779_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105538_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 105538_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:29:06.05 -26:37:55.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169919_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 169919_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:51:11.19 -29:28:08.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201730_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 201730_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185903_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 185903_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:22:17.33 -29:06:55.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56887_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 56887_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:44:27.00 -24:05:46.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148706_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 148706_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:55:14.20 -27:57:34.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127737_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 127737_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:17:22.24 -27:39:23.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55824_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 55824_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:02:23.77 -23:28:35.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76973_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 76973_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:33:25.81 -25:06:11.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107288_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 107288_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:07:25.21 -26:23:27.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59366_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 59366_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:26:11.60 -24:04:07.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100482_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 100482_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:57:08.02 -25:48:06.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15742_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 15742_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:59:33.72 -21:19:39.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68269_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 68269_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:22:36.12 -24:30:46.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130041_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 130041_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:14:12.70 -27:43:29.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161630_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 161630_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:33:03.96 -30:39:03.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156139_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 156139_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:47:04.25 -30:13:58.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142440_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 142440_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:00:45.21 -28:23:10.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148218_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
Preparing report for the candidate 148218_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121146_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 121146_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:25:39.07 -27:24:51.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110342_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 110342_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:37:41.51 -26:56:43.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144016_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 144016_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:05:38.75 -28:24:50.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161501_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 161501_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:51:03.77 -29:58:31.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53875_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 53875_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:46:34.17 -23:00:28.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183235_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 183235_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:44:48.47 -29:27:47.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147292_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
Preparing report for the candidate 147292_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153832_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 153832_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145966_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 145966_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:10:59.24 -28:25:25.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58710_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 58710_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:18:11.52 -23:55:49.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146394_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 146394_fd_Sgr-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_21-29-52_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
