fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits
fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2
| Date (UTC) | JD(UTC) | mag. | R.A. & Dec.(J2000) | X & Y (pix) | Image | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 08 09.42171 | 2461261.92171 | 11.72 | 23:58:21.72 -15:27:25.8 | 5026 1658 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 09.42225 | 2461261.92225 | 11.74 | 23:58:21.69 -15:27:25.0 | 5025 1664 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits |
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 09.4220 2461261.9220 11.73 23:58:21.70 -15:27:25.4
73.67365 -73.02338 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 6.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.
23 Thalia -0 -0 0 12.0 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 23:58:21.70 -15:27:25.4: 14.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 23:58:21.70 -15:27:25.4: 14.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS. Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs. WISE atlas Aladin Lite SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
| Date (UTC) | JD(UTC) | mag. | R.A. & Dec.(J2000) | X & Y (pix) | Image | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 08 09.42171 | 2461261.92171 | 12.69 | 00:03:25.46 -15:29:19.5 | 4288 1678 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 09.42225 | 2461261.92225 | 12.65 | 00:03:25.46 -15:29:19.6 | 4287 1685 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits |
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 09.4220 2461261.9220 12.67 00:03:25.46 -15:29:19.5
76.72484 -73.88030 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 6.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.
259 Aletheia -0 0 0 12.7 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:03:25.46 -15:29:19.5: 14.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:03:25.46 -15:29:19.5: 14.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS. Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs. WISE atlas Aladin Lite SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
######## Processing parameters ######## AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1 CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5 FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55 FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0 FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5 FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5 FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600 GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100 DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000 MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18 MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12 MPC_CODE= V36 NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000 NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000 OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3 ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5 SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0 TELESCOP= TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2 FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no ####################################### HOSTNAME= tau USER= HOME= ####################################### SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr) INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes FITS_FILE_EXT=fits CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX= Fields in the data directory: Cet-09-Q2b1x1 ####################################### ########### Starting Cet-09-Q2b1x1 ########### Processing Cet-09-Q2b1x1 server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 175421 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 175421 MB at . Checking input images (2 new) REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits Small preview (one of the new images):
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits_preview.png'
Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits
renamed 'Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits_preview.png'
Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits
Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2300.5383 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 471.8181 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1980.8258 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 549.9568 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1979.3445 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 549.3842 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 0.861027 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.001 INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 20.6900005340576 / [degC] Focuser temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits Header: 67 keys total, 4 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-09T05:07:05.4290972' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-09T10:07:05.4290972' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61261.4215906132 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-09T10:07:15.3301348' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61261.4217052083 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 359.998023620091 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = -17.9996738636609 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 37.9141666666667 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 189.029166666667 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.62482404214721 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cet-09' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '00 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-18 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20466 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20466 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 20.6900005340576 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 20.6900005340576 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 56: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 57: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 58: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 59: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 60: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 61: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 62: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 63: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 64: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/d_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits :) Spent 0.478441 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-07-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/d_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 19899.553568 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=13115.0, right_median=15628.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 20.4899997711182 / [degC] Focuser temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits Header: 67 keys total, 4 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-09T05:07:52.0817571' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-09T10:07:52.0817571' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61261.422130567 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-09T10:08:01.9849210' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61261.4222451854 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 359.998023543173 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = -17.9996738838427 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 37.8888888888889 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 189.258888888889 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.62574050853889 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cet-09' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '00 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-18 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20466 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20466 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 20.4899997711182 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 20.4899997711182 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 56: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 57: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 58: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 59: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 60: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 61: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 62: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 63: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 64: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/d_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits :) Spent 0.474622 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-07-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/d_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 19899.553568 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=13115.0, right_median=15628.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:
Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:
after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits
fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits
Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461261.92170635 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits' wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits' wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits' wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits' ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits Image size: 937.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 23:59:59.944 -18:00:06.42 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits Image size: 937.2'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 23:59:59.332 -18:00:00.08 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 23:59:59.944 -18:00:06.42 Second-epoch image center 23:59:59.332 -18:00:00.08 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0030 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits Image size: 937.2'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 23:59:58.796 -17:59:21.99 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 23:59:59.944 -18:00:06.42 Second-epoch image center 23:59:58.796 -17:59:21.99 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0132 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 23:59:59.332 -18:00:00.08 Second-epoch second image center 23:59:58.796 -17:59:21.99 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01079 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits &> /tmp/tmp.scpOW4UmNc Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3d76RfmUU4 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits &> /tmp/tmp.y08YHWcawZ Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits &> /tmp/tmp.IBhUVZ0WFy Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits and wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits and wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits and wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 2460 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.5854 to 8.4425 deg, Dec -23.2540 to -12.6292 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.5854 to 8.4425 deg, Dec -23.2540 to -12.6292 deg Loaded 4133 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 1989 out of 2020 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 2020 out of 2460 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.377200 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.377200 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.29 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.09 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.09
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 2460 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.5854 to 8.4425 deg, Dec -23.2540 to -12.6292 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.5854 to 8.4425 deg, Dec -23.2540 to -12.6292 deg Loaded 4133 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 1989 out of 2020 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 2020 out of 2460 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits (aperture=6.1) The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 2454 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.5961 to 8.4401 deg, Dec -23.2424 to -12.6281 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.5961 to 8.4401 deg, Dec -23.2424 to -12.6281 deg Loaded 4123 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 1992 out of 2014 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 2014 out of 2454 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits (aperture=6.1) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.2 pix Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits 2.2 pix Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits 2.3 pix fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits 2.2 pix fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 14.1 mag. Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits 14.1 mag. Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits 14.4 mag. fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits 14.5 mag. fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 11.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.scpOW4UmNc (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=208, bad_region=499, passed=2460 Got 2460 stars (including 1784 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2460 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5854 through 0 to 8.4425, gap 8.4425 to 351.5854 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 1726 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1723 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1723 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1723 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2032 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5853 through 0 to 8.4425, gap 8.4425 to 351.5853 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 1726 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1723 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2032 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1723 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2032 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Excluding outliers - 1723 stars left (next iteration limit 1895) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits N_match=1723 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.324 n_q1=568 n_q2=322 n_q3=534 n_q4=299 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.041 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits -region wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.3d76RfmUU4 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=201, bad_region=492, passed=2454 Got 2454 stars (including 1791 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2454 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5961 through 0 to 8.4401, gap 8.4401 to 351.5961 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.2 to -12.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 1733 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1729 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1729 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1729 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2031 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5952 through 0 to 8.4402, gap 8.4402 to 351.5952 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.2 to -12.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 1733 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1729 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2031 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1729 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2031 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Excluding outliers - 1729 stars left (next iteration limit 1901) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits N_match=1729 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.320 n_q1=569 n_q2=319 n_q3=549 n_q4=292 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.054 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits -region wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.y08YHWcawZ (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=215, bad_region=781, passed=3213 Got 3213 stars (including 2247 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3213 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5953 through 0 to 8.4402, gap 8.4402 to 351.5953 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 2178 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2176 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2176 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2176 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2570 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5956 through 0 to 8.4409, gap 8.4409 to 351.5956 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 2179 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2175 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2570 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2175 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2570 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Excluding outliers - 2175 stars left (next iteration limit 2393) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2175 robust_rms=7.234 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=8.365 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2175 robust_rms=0.352 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.412 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2175 robust_rms=0.277 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.287 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2175 robust_rms_before=1.059 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.275 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.277 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.285 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.287 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.285 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits N_match=2175 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.276 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.276 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.283 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.261 n_q1=659 n_q2=430 n_q3=675 n_q4=411 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.023 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.IBhUVZ0WFy (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=231, bad_region=772, passed=3130 Got 3130 stars (including 2163 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3130 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5952 through 0 to 8.4401, gap 8.4401 to 351.5952 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 2096 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2093 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2093 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2093 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2487 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5955 through 0 to 8.4409, gap 8.4409 to 351.5955 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 2096 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2092 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2487 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2092 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2487 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Excluding outliers - 2092 stars left (next iteration limit 2302) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2092 robust_rms=7.174 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=8.098 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2092 robust_rms=0.431 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.509 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2092 robust_rms=0.310 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.321 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2092 robust_rms_before=1.091 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.306 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.310 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.318 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.321 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.318 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits N_match=2092 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.315 n_q1=631 n_q2=415 n_q3=646 n_q4=400 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.037 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits sigma_overall=0.327 worst_q_ratio=1.041 ref2=Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits sigma_overall=0.335 worst_q_ratio=1.054 new1=fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits sigma_overall=0.276 worst_q_ratio=1.023 new2=fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits sigma_overall=0.319 worst_q_ratio=1.037 reference average sigma_overall=0.331 worst_q_ratio=1.0475 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472_astrometric_residuals.png (1723 matched stars from wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473_astrometric_residuals.png (1729 matched stars from wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480_astrometric_residuals.png (2175 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481_astrometric_residuals.png (2092 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 23:55:48.61 -17:47:25.7: 10.82 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:05:56.36 -20:39:14.8: 10.81 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 23:55:48.61 -17:47:25.7: 10.86 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:05:56.36 -20:39:14.8: 10.75 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.78 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.84 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:05:56.36 -20:39:14.8: ref_mag=10.78 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.9562 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:55:48.61 -17:47:25.7: ref_mag=10.84 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.9423 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90) make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20091_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481 The candidate 20091_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checksDiscovery image 1 2026 08 09.42171 2461261.92171 10.98 00:05:56.37 -20:39:14.9 3947 4804 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20092_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481 The candidate 20092_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 09.42225 2461261.92225 10.94 00:05:56.35 -20:39:14.7 3946 4810 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 09.42171 2461261.92171 10.94 23:55:48.62 -17:47:25.8 5390 3070 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20442_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481 The candidate 20442_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 09.42225 2461261.92225 10.95 23:55:48.61 -17:47:25.5 5389 3076 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits **** FOUND 23:49:36.80 -15:50:59.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits Image size: 937.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 23:59:59.944 -18:00:06.42 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits Image size: 937.2'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 23:59:59.332 -18:00:00.08 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 23:59:59.944 -18:00:06.42 Second-epoch image center 23:59:59.332 -18:00:00.08 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0030 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits Image size: 937.2'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 23:59:58.796 -17:59:21.99 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 23:59:59.944 -18:00:06.42 Second-epoch image center 23:59:58.796 -17:59:21.99 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0132 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 23:59:59.332 -18:00:00.08 Second-epoch second image center 23:59:58.796 -17:59:21.99 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01079 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Wd9KzMHDYN Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits &> /tmp/tmp.q6Y1kcQgnh Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lJyeikxIme Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits &> /tmp/tmp.G8qFRK1HAN Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits and wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_ Discovery image 2 2026 08 09.42225 2461261.92225 11.13 23:49:36.79 -15:50:59.3 6298 1911 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits .fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits and wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits and wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 14972 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.5847 to 8.4424 deg, Dec -23.2610 to -12.6028 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.5847 to 8.4424 deg, Dec -23.2610 to -12.6028 deg Loaded 4152 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3358 out of 3457 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3457 out of 14972 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.243850 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.243850 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.02 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.22 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.22
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 14972 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.5847 to 8.4424 deg, Dec -23.2610 to -12.6028 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.5847 to 8.4424 deg, Dec -23.2610 to -12.6028 deg Loaded 4152 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3358 out of 3457 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3457 out of 14972 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits (aperture=4.8) The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 15163 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.5857 to 8.4400 deg, Dec -23.2549 to -12.6016 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.5857 to 8.4400 deg, Dec -23.2549 to -12.6016 deg Loaded 4148 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3365 out of 3470 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3470 out of 15163 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits (aperture=4.7) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 16 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.1 pix Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits 2.1 pix Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits 2.2 pix fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits 2.1 pix fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 14.2 mag. Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits 14.2 mag. Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits 14.5 mag. fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits 14.6 mag. fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.5 (SNR ) 13.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.Wd9KzMHDYN (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=477, bad_region=2343, passed=14965 Got 14965 stars (including 12255 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14965 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5847 through 0 to 8.4424, gap 8.4424 to 351.5847 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4858 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4850 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4850 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4850 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13201 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5844 through 0 to 8.4425, gap 8.4425 to 351.5844 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4859 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4851 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13201 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4851 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13201 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Excluding outliers - 4851 stars left (next iteration limit 5335) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits N_match=4851 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.384 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.395 n_q1=1541 n_q2=825 n_q3=1604 n_q4=881 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.043 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits -region wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.q6Y1kcQgnh (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=1, blended=621, bad_region=2493, passed=15162 Got 15162 stars (including 12248 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 15162 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5857 through 0 to 8.4400, gap 8.4400 to 351.5857 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4854 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4843 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4843 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4843 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13254 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5846 through 0 to 8.4402, gap 8.4402 to 351.5846 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4854 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4843 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13254 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4843 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13254 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Excluding outliers - 4843 stars left (next iteration limit 5327) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits N_match=4843 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.421 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.372 n_q1=1540 n_q2=830 n_q3=1606 n_q4=867 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.069 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits -region wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.lJyeikxIme (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=541, bad_region=3387, passed=18129 Got 18129 stars (including 14289 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 18129 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5169 through 0 to 8.4402, gap 8.4402 to 351.5169 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4841 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4834 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4834 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4834 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15600 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5172 through 0 to 8.4409, gap 8.4409 to 351.5172 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4840 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4831 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15600 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4831 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15600 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Excluding outliers - 4831 stars left (next iteration limit 5317) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits N_match=4831 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.323 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.310 n_q1=1522 n_q2=943 n_q3=1479 n_q4=887 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.036 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.G8qFRK1HAN (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=565, bad_region=3432, passed=18478 Got 18478 stars (including 14587 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 18478 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5150 through 0 to 8.4401, gap 8.4401 to 351.5150 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4839 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4830 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4830 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4830 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15934 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5152 through 0 to 8.4409, gap 8.4409 to 351.5152 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4838 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4828 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15934 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4828 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15934 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Excluding outliers - 4828 stars left (next iteration limit 5313) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits N_match=4828 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.348 n_q1=1508 n_q2=949 n_q3=1490 n_q4=881 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.072 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:17:09.47 -21:53:46.9: 13.96 +/- 0.18 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:13:19.62 -21:18:39.2: 13.85 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:18:28.78 -22:12:01.9: 13.78 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:15:33.06 -21:23:29.7: 14.03 +/- 0.18 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:03:25.46 -15:29:19.5: 14.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:05:47.15 -19:25:07.6: 12.91 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 23:58:21.70 -15:27:25.4: 14.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:18:21.18 -21:06:40.9: 14.22 +/- 0.24 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 23:48:54.31 -22:05:47.5: 14.24 +/- 0.24 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:12:43.46 -21:31:49.8: 14.02 +/- 0.18 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:18:21.18 -21:06:40.9: 14.03 +/- 0.21 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 23:58:21.70 -15:27:25.4: 14.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:17:09.47 -21:53:46.9: 13.83 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:13:19.62 -21:18:39.2: 13.93 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:03:25.46 -15:29:19.5: 14.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 23:48:54.31 -22:05:47.5: 14.05 +/- 0.21 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:15:33.06 -21:23:29.7: 14.27 +/- 0.23 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:18:28.78 -22:12:01.9: 13.72 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:12:43.46 -21:31:49.8: 14.00 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:05:47.15 -19:25:07.6: 12.96 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.89 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.89 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.12 +/- 0.14 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.01 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.11 +/- 0.16 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:17:09.47 -21:53:46.9: ref_mag=13.89 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.6926 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.14 +/- 0.16 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:13:19.62 -21:18:39.2: ref_mag=13.89 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.6380 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.94 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:12:43.46 -21:31:49.8: ref_mag=14.01 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.6894 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:15:33.06 -21:23:29.7: ref_mag=14.12 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.6904 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:18:21.18 -21:06:40.9: ref_mag=14.11 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=13.6428 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:18:28.78 -22:12:01.9: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.5048 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:48:54.31 -22:05:47.5: ref_mag=14.14 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=13.5863 delta=0.55 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:05:47.15 -19:25:07.6: ref_mag=12.94 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2078 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:09:26.92 -21:20:50.3: 13.98 +/- 0.18 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:15:19.00 -21:29:12.2: 13.90 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 23:47:50.16 -22:00:51.3: 13.82 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:13:41.09 -18:24:03.5: 13.78 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:06:56.42 -22:09:33.0: 13.71 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:09:26.92 -21:20:50.3: 14.00 +/- 0.18 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:13:41.09 -18:24:03.5: 13.90 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:15:19.00 -21:29:12.2: 13.90 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:06:56.42 -22:09:33.0: 13.68 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 23:47:50.16 -22:00:51.3: 13.78 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.99 +/- 0.13 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:09:26.92 -21:20:50.3: ref_mag=13.99 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.7776 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.69 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:13:41.09 -18:24:03.5: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.8378 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:15:19.00 -21:29:12.2: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.6903 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:06:56.42 -22:09:33.0: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.7455 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:47:50.16 -22:00:51.3: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.7041 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90) Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out21520.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out22121.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20944_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481 The candidate 20944_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checksDiscovery image 1 2026 08 09.42171 2461261.92171 13.28 00:05:47.21 -19:25:07.4 3963 4056 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21520_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481 Preparing report for the candidate 21520_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 22121_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481 Preparing report for the candidate 22121_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 22955_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481 The candidate 22955_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 09.42225 2461261.92225 13.16 00:05:47.09 -19:25:07.7 3962 4062 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 09.42171 2461261.92171 13.51 00:18:28.80 -22:12:01.8 2188 5781 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 23110_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481 The candidate 23110_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 09.42225 2461261.92225 13.50 00:18:28.76 -22:12:02.0 2187 5788 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 09.42171 2461261.92171 13.64 00:17:09.45 -21:53:46.5 2371 5589 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 23116_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481 The candidate 23116_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 09.42225 2461261.92225 13.77 00:17:09.49 -21:53:47.3 2370 5596 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 09.42171 2461261.92171 13.55 23:48:54.25 -22:05:47.1 6347 5689 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 23142_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481 The candidate 23142_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 09.42225 2461261.92225 13.63 23:48:54.37 -22:05:47.9 6346 5696 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 09.42171 2461261.92171 13.64 00:18:21.23 -21:06:40.4 2190 5116 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 23147_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481 The candidate 23147_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 09.42225 2461261.92225 13.64 00:18:21.14 -21:06:41.3 2189 5123 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 09.42171 2461261.92171 13.64 00:13:19.60 -21:18:39.2 2906 5219 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 23160_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481 The candidate 23160_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 09.42225 2461261.92225 13.64 00:13:19.64 -21:18:39.2 2905 5225 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 09.42171 2461261.92171 13.67 00:12:43.46 -21:31:49.5 2994 5350 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 23161_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481 The candidate 23161_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 09.42225 2461261.92225 13.71 00:12:43.46 -21:31:50.2 2993 5357 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 09.42171 2461261.92171 13.68 00:15:33.05 -21:23:29.7 2592 5276 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 23183_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481 The candidate 23183_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 09.42225 2461261.92225 13.70 00:15:33.07 -21:23:29.8 2591 5282 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 09.42171 2461261.92171 13.67 00:06:56.39 -22:09:32.9 3814 5719 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 23250_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481 The candidate 23250_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 09.42225 2461261.92225 13.86 00:06:56.45 -22:09:33.1 3812 5725 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 09.42171 2461261.92171 13.71 00:15:19.01 -21:29:12.7 2627 5333 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 23321_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481 The candidate 23321_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 09.42225 2461261.92225 13.67 00:15:19.00 -21:29:11.7 2625 5339 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 09.42171 2461261.92171 13.70 23:47:50.17 -22:00:50.9 6498 5642 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 23353_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481 The candidate 23353_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 09.42225 2461261.92225 13.71 23:47:50.14 -22:00:51.6 6497 5648 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 09.42171 2461261.92171 13.76 00:09:26.93 -21:20:50.1 3455 5230 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 23377_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481 The candidate 23377_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 09.42225 2461261.92225 13.80 00:09:26.91 -21:20:50.4 3454 5237 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits Discovery image 1 2026 08 09.42171 2461261.92171 13.78 00:13:41.10 -18:24:03.4 2824 3456 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 13583_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481 The candidate 13583_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 08 09.42225 2461261.92225 13.93 00:13:41.08 -18:24:03.7 2822 3463 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits **** FOUND 23:43:49.88 -15:17:08.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 7s Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 23:58:21.70 -15:27:25.4 00:03:25.46 -15:29:19.5 ########### Completed Cet-09-Q2b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### 23:58:21.70 -15:27:25.4 00:03:25.46 -15:29:19.5 ################################################################################### 23:58:21.70 -15:27:25.4 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 00:03:25.46 -15:29:19.5 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461261.92170635 -observatory V36 08:05:23.22 +20:14:52.6 Mercury (-0.7mag) 12:07:00.19 -01:37:47.4 Venus (-4.4mag) 05:52:45.90 +23:37:58.9 Mars (1.3mag) 08:44:01.40 +18:37:16.6 Jupiter (-1.8mag) 00:56:19.83 +03:14:29.6 Saturn (0.6mag) 04:11:52.12 +20:57:18.7 Uranus (5.7mag) 00:16:01.83 +00:12:38.6 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:28:01.57 -23:30:38.6 Pluto (14.5mag) 06:08:39.80 +27:27:58.0 Moon (-9.2mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Aug 9 06:32 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461261.92170635: 08:44:07.49 +18:36:51.6 Io (6.0mag) 08:44:04.17 +18:37:05.0 Europa (6.3mag) 08:44:12.49 +18:36:26.5 Ganymede (5.6mag) 08:44:18.73 +18:36:05.5 Callisto (6.8mag) 08:41:33.91 +18:37:23.2 Himalia (15.7mag) 08:44:03.62 +18:37:08.2 Thebe (16.6mag) 08:41:06.66 +18:35:40.5 Elara (17.7mag) 08:48:08.82 +18:16:10.9 Pasiphae (17.9mag) 08:47:07.48 +18:47:48.8 Carme (19.0mag) 00:56:06.84 +03:14:38.6 Titan (8.4mag) 00:56:22.18 +03:14:32.8 Rhea (9.7mag) 00:56:32.50 +03:13:28.4 Iapetus (11.1mag) 00:56:07.30 +03:14:09.9 Hyperion (14.4mag) 00:55:40.71 +03:07:31.0 Phoebe (16.5mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Aug 9 06:33 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461261.92170635: 19:07:22.01 -22:22:57.7 JWST 18:02:11.35 +28:14:31.6 Chandra 06:26:07.79 +19:37:59.7 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Aug 9 06:32 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461261.92170635 -observatory V36 03:15:02.44 +17:28:43.4 17.6mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 18:01:27.64 -34:37:13.3 14.0mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 06:54:54.29 -68:56:42.5 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:10:08.36 +33:01:07.4 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 03:47:17.39 +38:11:19.8 16.8mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 22:37:38.88 +31:22:36.1 17.3mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 06:44:41.00 +26:31:14.8 16.8mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 10:22:40.70 +28:24:56.2 17.0mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 09:29:40.01 +05:18:15.9 17.9mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 15:12:40.06 -12:19:54.0 17.9mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS) 21:09:08.99 +65:52:58.6 17.9mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon) 15:46:38.59 -13:02:54.8 14.4mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 08:09:26.87 +31:24:00.8 15.3mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:06:45.77 +15:36:18.5 17.7mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 19:01:36.92 +43:09:09.6 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 21:08:57.34 +49:16:53.2 17.6mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS) 05:16:06.22 -12:57:15.1 15.4mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 06:57:01.00 +23:56:45.0 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 07:31:19.75 -16:18:21.8 17.8mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS) 10:34:33.73 +20:49:49.8 17.3mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 12:58:50.75 +02:16:15.8 17.0mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 16:02:52.45 +77:43:09.5 16.8mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 03:07:55.75 +46:12:41.8 17.1mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 11:47:46.59 +08:40:36.1 17.3mag A/2026 E1 21:59:39.47 -27:48:01.2 6.9mag 10P/Tempel 11:29:40.56 -03:28:20.7 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 04:40:43.89 +32:33:30.3 18.0mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson 11:10:08.38 +04:14:56.0 17.3mag 63P/Wild 00:54:08.78 -05:29:35.6 15.4mag 65P/Gunn 05:38:16.84 +20:40:45.5 13.7mag 78P/Gehrels 20:36:52.73 -23:39:48.6 17.7mag 84P/Giclas 03:01:55.80 +13:46:53.8 16.7mag 88P/Howell 07:58:58.74 +27:29:57.6 16.2mag 93P/Lovas 04:09:41.54 +17:20:17.8 17.5mag 112P/Urata-Niijima 06:00:27.61 +30:11:11.9 16.3mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 09:21:20.95 +26:26:52.5 15.0mag 123P/West-Hartley 11:46:06.74 -10:43:45.8 17.1mag 124P/Mrkos 05:38:20.17 +21:10:35.8 16.1mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 06:30:34.85 +18:50:37.7 17.9mag 131P/Mueller 00:03:12.07 +03:23:46.4 17.6mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma 03:19:48.71 -19:08:01.9 13.7mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 07:20:19.87 +37:52:06.2 15.9mag 162P/SidingSpring 14:49:39.01 +41:24:37.9 12.1mag 169P/NEAT 02:45:12.74 +09:31:54.9 17.6mag 220P/McNaught 16:42:12.50 -10:10:32.6 17.7mag 235P/LINEAR 20:21:34.75 -52:48:57.5 17.8mag 259P/Garradd 03:25:37.23 +25:40:42.1 15.3mag 260P/McNaught 07:09:00.57 +37:41:25.7 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR 15:10:51.58 +03:00:26.0 17.7mag 391P/Kowalski 09:01:59.07 +18:19:03.9 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.5K Aug 9 06:32 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08 22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17 14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02 12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61 16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09 01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97 21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13 18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06 12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98 13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38 18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63 14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15 20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53 19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82 19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31 17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67 19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52 18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92 19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91 19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81 04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96 13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01 16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07 10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63 14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62 13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09 00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13 11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56 21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14 17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72 14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53 20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4 15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57 23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64 17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15 00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20 AT2026ntk 2026-06-18.09 17.34 20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93 23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83 02:02:26.67 +32:04:22.70 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.6 15.52 21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05 17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62 13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24 00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22 14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32 12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69 12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02 10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75 13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58 00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58 01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70 SN 2026obc 2026-06-7.43 15.15 21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90 ASASSN-26dr 2026-06-7.24 16.24 06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00 ASASSN-26ds 2026-06-2.97 15.02 20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12 11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63 11:44:33.11 -68:48:32.90 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24.03 8.35 19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28 14:23:56.59 -58:37:47.40 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.59 11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46 21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86 00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34 15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44 11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55 13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96 02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37 17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7 01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8 16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8 09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63 21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9 14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21 14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89 12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5 13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23 09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51 15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.40 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.07 13.88 10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52 22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2 21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51 16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.15 15.93 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Aug 9 06:32 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0 TCP J12242510+2847120 2026-05-31.6015 14.8mag 00:56:07.13 +43:01:40.6 TCP J00560713+4301406 2026-06-01.4135 12.2mag 00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2 PNV J00424164+4115162 2026-06-02.029 17.4mag 00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2 PNV J00423868+4115582 2026-06-05.1224 19.97Umag 19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7 PNV J19004295-4831017 2026-05-25.0752 14.2mag 09:55:21.28 +69:02:52.6 PNV J09552128+6902526 2026-06-13.933 18.9mag 19:51:21.42 +37:06:40.0 TCP J19512142+3706400 2026-06-17.2942 16.8mag 19:57:03.87 +37:41:46.4 TCP J19570387+3741464 2026-06-18.2638 17.5mag 00:42:32.04 +41:10:28.3 PNV J00423204+4110283 2026-06-26.059 16.6mag 02:19:17.36 +28:57:15.8 TCP J02191736+2857158 2026-07-12.3549 12.5mag 00:44:56.43 +41:57:41.6 PNV J00445643+4157416 2026-07-13.8026 17.98Cmag 00:42:55.36 +41:17:27.0 PNV J00425536+4117270 2026-07-20.1813 17.7mag 20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9 TCP J20354364+6131329 2026-07-20.5443 14.4mag 21:17:31.48 +22:25:51.0 TCP J21173148+2225510 2026-07-23.5577 14.8mag 00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8 PNV J00412404+4049028 2026-07-25.0157 18.7mag 00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6 PNV J00430426+4102286 2026-07-26.1512 20mag 14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0 TCP J14515140+6613240 2026-07-29.2561 13.5mag 00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2 PNV J00430615+4122082 2026-07-30.0085 19.4mag 00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2 PNV J00413323+4110122 2026-08-02.8913 17.1mag 05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-06.4109 11.2mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 189K Aug 9 06:32 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 07:29:03.374 -66:53:37.31 AT 2026wex 2026-07-25.15 18.281 01:42:47.795 -06:27:10.68 AT 2026wew 2026-07-25.45 19.7348 00:50:41.969 +09:13:17.18 SN 2026wev 2026-07-24.43 20.2592 04:03:01.245 +02:18:01.70 AT 2026weu 2026-07-25.48 19.4696 04:08:44.774 +15:30:54.17 AT 2026wet 2026-07-23.48 20.1342 05:10:15.909 +18:10:11.78 AT 2026wes 2026-07-24.49 18.6481 06:18:11.756 +51:00:15.14 AT 2026wer 2026-07-24.49 18.639 22:19:44.999 -27:22:20.19 AT 2026weq 2026-07-13.44 19.377 20:41:38.010 -18:35:01.60 SN 2026wep 2026-07-23.31 20.3302 01:10:22.021 -09:34:08.15 SN 2026weo 2026-07-24.43 20.636 02:27:10.045 +36:08:07.18 AT 2026wen 2026-07-22.43 20.04 01:17:11.858 +43:13:46.93 AT 2026wem 2026-07-03.45 20.3459 20:51:08.964 +18:09:10.80 AT 2026wel 2026-07-21.37 20.276 22:08:07.720 -53:03:58.03 AT 2026wek 2026-07-24.88 18.736 14:52:41.154 -38:57:24.25 AT 2026wej 2026-07-24.81 18.497 21:24:57.173 +01:23:35.53 AT 2026wei 2026-07-21.60 20.35 02:03:17.642 -30:45:34.31 AT 2026weh 2026-07-24.56 18.896 01:05:30.285 -23:04:46.16 AT 2026weg 2026-07-24.51 18.833 12:18:53.701 +49:05:35.94 AT 2026wef 2026-07-24.89 18.37 00:31:47.490 -16:38:50.31 AT 2026wee 2026-07-25.19 20.36 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 87K Aug 9 06:32 tns_transients_list.txt Discovery image 3 2026 08 09.42225 2461261.92225 8.51 23:43:49.89 -15:17:08.5 7150 1581 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_063027_TTUQ2b1x1_1467391_bO1Dcnu2/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_05-07-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0481.fits
