This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_050013_TTUQ1b1x1_1219784_DqXCglqg
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 09.4162 2461261.9162 10.31 21:44:44.12 -14:09:18.6
39.86044 -44.71773 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 9.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.354 Eleonora 0 -0 0 10.5 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits at 21:44:44.12 -14:09:18.6: 15.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits at 21:44:44.12 -14:09:18.6: 15.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 09.4162* 21 44 44.12 -14 09 18.6 10.3 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461261.9162,10.31,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260809.4162 10.31CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 09.4162 2461261.9162 10.61 21:24:09.93 -14:08:36.2
37.12327 -40.15801 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 9.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.306 Unitas 0 -0 0 10.4 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits at 21:24:09.93 -14:08:36.2: 15.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits at 21:24:09.93 -14:08:36.2: 15.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461261.9162,10.61,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260809.4162 10.61CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 09.4162 2461261.9162 13.12 21:17:34.68 -14:14:15.3
36.18227 -38.73319 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 9.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.558 Carmen 0 0 0 13.0 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits at 21:17:34.68 -14:14:15.3: 15.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits at 21:17:34.68 -14:14:15.3: 15.30 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461261.9162,13.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260809.4162 13.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 09.4162 2461261.9162 12.87 20:49:52.84 -20:08:17.3
26.30171 -34.73985 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 9.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.462 Eriphyla 0 -0 0 12.9 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits at 20:49:52.84 -20:08:17.3: 15.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits at 20:49:52.84 -20:08:17.3: 15.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 09.4162* 20 49 52.84 -20 08 17.3 12.9 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461261.9162,12.87,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260809.4162 12.87CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 09.4162 2461261.9162 13.36 21:27:26.18 -16:40:12.4
34.43957 -41.86269 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 9.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.653 Berenike -1 0 1 13.5 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits at 21:27:26.18 -16:40:12.4: 15.36 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits at 21:27:26.18 -16:40:12.4: 15.44 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 09.4162* 21 27 26.18 -16 40 12.4 13.4 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461261.9162,13.36,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260809.4162 13.36CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 09.4162 2461261.9162 13.69 20:59:40.74 -17:38:23.0
30.16499 -36.04213 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 9.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1860 Barbarossa 1 -1 1 13.6 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits at 20:59:40.74 -17:38:23.0: 15.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits at 20:59:40.74 -17:38:23.0: 15.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 09.4162* 20 59 40.74 -17 38 23.0 13.7 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461261.9162,13.69,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260809.4162 13.69CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 09.4162 2461261.9162 13.94 20:50:14.37 -17:19:29.6
29.52569 -33.83060 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.7" and 9.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.569 Misa -0 1 1 14.0 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits at 20:50:14.37 -17:19:29.6: 15.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits at 20:50:14.37 -17:19:29.6: 15.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 09.4162* 20 50 14.37 -17 19 29.6 13.9 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461261.9162,13.94,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260809.4162 13.94CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 09.4162 2461261.9162 14.12 21:21:59.06 -18:59:14.3
30.92280 -41.47251 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 9.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.708 Raphaela -0 1 1 14.2 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits at 21:21:59.06 -18:59:14.3: 15.29 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits at 21:21:59.06 -18:59:14.3: 15.36 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 09.4162* 21 21 59.06 -18 59 14.3 14.1 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461261.9162,14.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260809.4162 14.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461242.80621082 21.07.2026 07:20:46.615 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits
First image: 2461242.80621082 21.07.2026 07:20:46.615 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits
Last image: 2461261.91649478 09.08.2026 09:59:35.149 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_050013_TTUQ1b1x1_1219784_DqXCglqg/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 2
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.98
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6200
Objects passed selection criteria: 6187
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5368.5
Average stars matched: 5214.75 (97.1361 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 232600 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Aug 6 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-190-gdf2934b0
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Aug 9 05:02:29 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461242.80621082 21.07.2026 07:20:46.615 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits
First image: 2461242.80621082 21.07.2026 07:20:46.615 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits
Last image: 2461261.91649478 09.08.2026 09:59:35.149 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_050013_TTUQ1b1x1_1219784_DqXCglqg/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 67
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.69
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 13 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 42969
Objects passed selection criteria: 42858
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 39440.8
Average stars matched: 37839 (95.9388 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 263728 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Aug 6 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-190-gdf2934b0
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Aug 9 05:03:36 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_050013_TTUQ1b1x1_1219784_DqXCglqg/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-58-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_050013_TTUQ1b1x1_1219784_DqXCglqg/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_050013_TTUQ1b1x1_1219784_DqXCglqg/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-58-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_050013_TTUQ1b1x1_1219784_DqXCglqg/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461261.91589905
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits'
wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits'
wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-58-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-58-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-58-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-58-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits'
wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.5' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:19:56.022 -18:00:07.45 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-58-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-58-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:20:12.424 -17:58:13.75 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 21:19:56.022 -18:00:07.45
Second-epoch image center 21:20:12.424 -17:58:13.75
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0723 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:20:09.673 -17:57:33.53 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 21:19:56.022 -18:00:07.45
Second-epoch image center 21:20:09.673 -17:57:33.53
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0690 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 21:20:12.424 -17:58:13.75
Second-epoch second image center 21:20:09.673 -17:57:33.53
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01561 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits &> /tmp/tmp.BHaur6ygZs
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits &> /tmp/tmp.N9sGpjlh6p
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_050013_TTUQ1b1x1_1219784_DqXCglqg/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-58-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits &> /tmp/tmp.eTF5elJ0W6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_050013_TTUQ1b1x1_1219784_DqXCglqg/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-58-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_050013_TTUQ1b1x1_1219784_DqXCglqg/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SCgpqGUhSB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_050013_TTUQ1b1x1_1219784_DqXCglqg/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits and wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits and wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits and wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6360 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 311.5300 to 328.4153 deg, Dec -23.2576 to -12.6409 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 311.5300 to 328.4153 deg, Dec -23.2576 to -12.6409 deg
Loaded 6825 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4715 out of 4834 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4834 out of 6360 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.521100
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.521100
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.98
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.54
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.54
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6360 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 311.5300 to 328.4153 deg, Dec -23.2576 to -12.6409 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 311.5300 to 328.4153 deg, Dec -23.2576 to -12.6409 deg
Loaded 6825 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4715 out of 4834 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4834 out of 6360 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 6478 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 311.5993 to 328.4343 deg, Dec -23.2575 to -12.6203 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 311.5993 to 328.4343 deg, Dec -23.2575 to -12.6203 deg
Loaded 6821 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4805 out of 4916 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4916 out of 6478 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits
2.2 pix Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits
2.1 pix fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-58-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
2.1 pix fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.5 mag. Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits
14.6 mag. Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-58-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 11.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.BHaur6ygZs (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-09_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_050013_TTUQ1b1x1_1219784_DqXCglqg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=453, bad_region=0, passed=6360
Got 6360 stars (including 5899 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6360 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4811 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4798 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4798 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4798 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6360 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4812 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4798 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6360 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4798 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6360 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4798 stars left (next iteration limit 5277)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits N_match=4798 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.318 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.449 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.429 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.382 n_q1=1363 n_q2=1018 n_q3=1373 n_q4=1044 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.160
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits -region wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.N9sGpjlh6p (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-09_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_050013_TTUQ1b1x1_1219784_DqXCglqg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=435, bad_region=0, passed=6478
Got 6478 stars (including 6036 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6478 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4816 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4799 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4799 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4799 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6478 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4815 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4799 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6478 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4799 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6478 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4799 stars left (next iteration limit 5278)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits N_match=4799 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.411 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.399 n_q1=1357 n_q2=1006 n_q3=1389 n_q4=1047 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.168
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits -region wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.eTF5elJ0W6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-09_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_050013_TTUQ1b1x1_1219784_DqXCglqg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_050013_TTUQ1b1x1_1219784_DqXCglqg/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-58-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_050013_TTUQ1b1x1_1219784_DqXCglqg/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-58-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_050013_TTUQ1b1x1_1219784_DqXCglqg/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-58-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_050013_TTUQ1b1x1_1219784_DqXCglqg/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-58-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_050013_TTUQ1b1x1_1219784_DqXCglqg/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-58-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_050013_TTUQ1b1x1_1219784_DqXCglqg/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-58-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-58-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-58-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-58-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-58-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-58-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-58-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-58-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_050013_TTUQ1b1x1_1219784_DqXCglqg/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-58-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-58-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=281, bad_region=0, passed=4405
Got 4405 stars (including 4117 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-58-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4405 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3936 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3917 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4405 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4405 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4405 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 3917 stars left (next iteration limit 4308)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3917 robust_rms=10.972 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.624 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3917 robust_rms=0.511 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.569 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3917 robust_rms=0.355 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.391 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3917 robust_rms_before=0.995 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.338 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.355 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.365 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.391
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.365 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-58-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits N_match=3917 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.349 n_q1=932 n_q2=1082 n_q3=887 n_q4=1016 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.089
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-58-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-58-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_050013_TTUQ1b1x1_1219784_DqXCglqg/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-58-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-58-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-58-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.SCgpqGUhSB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-09_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_050013_TTUQ1b1x1_1219784_DqXCglqg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_050013_TTUQ1b1x1_1219784_DqXCglqg/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_050013_TTUQ1b1x1_1219784_DqXCglqg/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_050013_TTUQ1b1x1_1219784_DqXCglqg/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_050013_TTUQ1b1x1_1219784_DqXCglqg/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_050013_TTUQ1b1x1_1219784_DqXCglqg/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_050013_TTUQ1b1x1_1219784_DqXCglqg/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_050013_TTUQ1b1x1_1219784_DqXCglqg/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=289, bad_region=0, passed=4374
Got 4374 stars (including 4078 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4374 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3895 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3881 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4374 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3896 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4374 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4374 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 3881 stars left (next iteration limit 4269)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3881 robust_rms=11.116 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.181 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3881 robust_rms=0.514 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.540 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3881 robust_rms=0.356 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.383 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3881 robust_rms_before=0.978 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.336 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.356 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.361 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.383
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.361 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits N_match=3881 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.307 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.352 n_q1=915 n_q2=1067 n_q3=878 n_q4=1021 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.104
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_050013_TTUQ1b1x1_1219784_DqXCglqg/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits sigma_overall=0.387 worst_q_ratio=1.160
ref2=Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits sigma_overall=0.389 worst_q_ratio=1.168
new1=fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-58-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits sigma_overall=0.345 worst_q_ratio=1.089
new2=fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits sigma_overall=0.335 worst_q_ratio=1.104
reference average sigma_overall=0.388 worst_q_ratio=1.164
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826_astrometric_residuals.png (4798 matched stars from wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294_astrometric_residuals.png (4799 matched stars from wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-58-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432_astrometric_residuals.png (3917 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-58-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433_astrometric_residuals.png (3881 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-58-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-58-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_050013_TTUQ1b1x1_1219784_DqXCglqg/wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-58-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_050013_TTUQ1b1x1_1219784_DqXCglqg/wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits at 21:44:44.12 -14:09:18.6: 15.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits at 21:24:09.93 -14:08:36.2: 15.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits at 21:24:09.93 -14:08:36.2: 15.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits at 21:44:44.12 -14:09:18.6: 15.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20487.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20502.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20487_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
Preparing report for the candidate 20487_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20502_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
Preparing report for the candidate 20502_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 11s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cap-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
21:44:44.12 -14:09:18.6
21:24:09.93 -14:08:36.2
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_050013_TTUQ1b1x1_1219784_DqXCglqg/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-58-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_050013_TTUQ1b1x1_1219784_DqXCglqg/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_050013_TTUQ1b1x1_1219784_DqXCglqg/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-58-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_050013_TTUQ1b1x1_1219784_DqXCglqg/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-58-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-58-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.5' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:19:56.022 -18:00:07.45 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-58-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-58-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:20:12.424 -17:58:13.75 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 21:19:56.022 -18:00:07.45
Second-epoch image center 21:20:12.424 -17:58:13.75
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0723 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:20:09.673 -17:57:33.53 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 21:19:56.022 -18:00:07.45
Second-epoch image center 21:20:09.673 -17:57:33.53
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0690 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 21:20:12.424 -17:58:13.75
Second-epoch second image center 21:20:09.673 -17:57:33.53
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01561 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits &> /tmp/tmp.aQT21J79Ri
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XbTvSyit3W
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_050013_TTUQ1b1x1_1219784_DqXCglqg/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-58-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits &> /tmp/tmp.MmOslAGqbm
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_050013_TTUQ1b1x1_1219784_DqXCglqg/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-58-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_050013_TTUQ1b1x1_1219784_DqXCglqg/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits &> /tmp/tmp.tapeis0XPC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_050013_TTUQ1b1x1_1219784_DqXCglqg/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits and wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits and wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits and wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 43812 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 311.5184 to 328.4562 deg, Dec -23.2684 to -12.6245 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 311.5184 to 328.4562 deg, Dec -23.2684 to -12.6245 deg
Loaded 6876 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5472 out of 5901 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5901 out of 43812 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.372050
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.372050
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.69
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.68
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.68
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 43812 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 311.5184 to 328.4562 deg, Dec -23.2684 to -12.6245 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 311.5184 to 328.4562 deg, Dec -23.2684 to -12.6245 deg
Loaded 6876 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5472 out of 5901 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5901 out of 43812 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits (aperture=4.8)
Read 44610 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 311.5462 to 328.4751 deg, Dec -23.2614 to -12.6203 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 311.5462 to 328.4751 deg, Dec -23.2614 to -12.6203 deg
Loaded 6861 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5471 out of 5899 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5899 out of 44610 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits (aperture=4.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 59 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits
2.1 pix Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits
1.9 pix fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-58-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
1.9 pix fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.7 mag. Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits
14.7 mag. Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-58-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.3 (SNR ) 13.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.aQT21J79Ri (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-09_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_050013_TTUQ1b1x1_1219784_DqXCglqg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=19, blended=1808, bad_region=0, passed=43793
Got 43793 stars (including 41923 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43793 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4802 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4793 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4793 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4793 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43793 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4802 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4793 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43793 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4793 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43793 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4793 stars left (next iteration limit 5272)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits N_match=4793 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.440 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.421 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.382 n_q1=1380 n_q2=1058 n_q3=1303 n_q4=1052 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.158
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits -region wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.XbTvSyit3W (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-09_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_050013_TTUQ1b1x1_1219784_DqXCglqg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=1828, bad_region=0, passed=44597
Got 44597 stars (including 42705 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 44597 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4806 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4795 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4795 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4795 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44597 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4806 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4795 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44597 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4795 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44597 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4795 stars left (next iteration limit 5274)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits N_match=4795 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.384 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.440 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.409 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.383 n_q1=1377 n_q2=1033 n_q3=1333 n_q4=1052 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.144
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits -region wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.MmOslAGqbm (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-09_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_050013_TTUQ1b1x1_1219784_DqXCglqg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_050013_TTUQ1b1x1_1219784_DqXCglqg/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-58-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_050013_TTUQ1b1x1_1219784_DqXCglqg/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-58-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_050013_TTUQ1b1x1_1219784_DqXCglqg/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-58-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_050013_TTUQ1b1x1_1219784_DqXCglqg/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-58-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_050013_TTUQ1b1x1_1219784_DqXCglqg/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-58-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_050013_TTUQ1b1x1_1219784_DqXCglqg/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-58-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-58-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-58-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-58-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-58-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-58-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-58-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-58-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_050013_TTUQ1b1x1_1219784_DqXCglqg/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-58-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-58-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=1057, bad_region=20, passed=35182
Got 35182 stars (including 34034 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-58-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 35182 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4792 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4776 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4776 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4776 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35182 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4789 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4776 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35182 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4776 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35182 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4776 stars left (next iteration limit 5253)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-58-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-58-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits N_match=4776 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.352 n_q1=1155 n_q2=1369 n_q3=1053 n_q4=1199 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.057
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-58-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-58-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_050013_TTUQ1b1x1_1219784_DqXCglqg/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-58-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-58-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-58-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.tapeis0XPC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-09_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_050013_TTUQ1b1x1_1219784_DqXCglqg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_050013_TTUQ1b1x1_1219784_DqXCglqg/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_050013_TTUQ1b1x1_1219784_DqXCglqg/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_050013_TTUQ1b1x1_1219784_DqXCglqg/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_050013_TTUQ1b1x1_1219784_DqXCglqg/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_050013_TTUQ1b1x1_1219784_DqXCglqg/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_050013_TTUQ1b1x1_1219784_DqXCglqg/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_050013_TTUQ1b1x1_1219784_DqXCglqg/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=1040, bad_region=19, passed=35279
Got 35279 stars (including 34165 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 35279 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4787 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4774 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4774 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4774 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35279 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4787 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4775 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35279 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4775 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35279 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4775 stars left (next iteration limit 5251)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits N_match=4775 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.347 n_q1=1166 n_q2=1364 n_q3=1038 n_q4=1207 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.128
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_050013_TTUQ1b1x1_1219784_DqXCglqg/fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-58-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_050013_TTUQ1b1x1_1219784_DqXCglqg/wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-58-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_050013_TTUQ1b1x1_1219784_DqXCglqg/wcs_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits at 20:55:15.16 -13:07:21.3: 12.13 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits at 21:22:18.71 -15:48:10.0: 13.97 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits at 21:20:00.31 -14:46:32.4: 13.40 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits at 21:48:49.80 -17:34:32.5: 13.27 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits at 20:58:55.59 -13:44:29.6: 13.30 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits at 20:58:06.59 -13:20:14.3: 14.15 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits at 21:20:44.33 -15:02:49.5: 13.02 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits at 21:01:23.12 -13:41:57.9: 13.04 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits at 20:58:32.77 -14:18:22.6: 14.15 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits at 20:49:54.25 -13:14:46.1: 12.48 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits at 21:20:44.33 -15:02:49.5: 13.03 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits at 20:58:55.59 -13:44:29.6: 13.20 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits at 20:58:06.59 -13:20:14.3: 13.92 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits at 20:55:15.16 -13:07:21.3: 12.16 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits at 20:49:54.25 -13:14:46.1: 12.55 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits at 21:20:00.31 -14:46:32.4: 13.42 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits at 21:22:18.71 -15:48:10.0: 13.85 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits at 21:01:23.12 -13:41:57.9: 13.04 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits at 21:48:49.80 -17:34:32.5: 13.28 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.02 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits at 20:58:32.77 -14:18:22.6: 14.20 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:20:44.33 -15:02:49.5: ref_mag=13.02 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5125 delta=-0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.24 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.00 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.14 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.51 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.41 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:58:55.59 -13:44:29.6: ref_mag=13.24 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6172 delta=-0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:58:06.59 -13:20:14.3: ref_mag=14.00 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.0098 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:55:15.16 -13:07:21.3: ref_mag=12.14 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3996 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.04 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.28 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:49:54.25 -13:14:46.1: ref_mag=12.51 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8369 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:20:00.31 -14:46:32.4: ref_mag=13.41 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7621 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:22:18.71 -15:48:10.0: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.2808 delta=-0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:01:23.12 -13:41:57.9: ref_mag=13.04 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3429 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:48:49.80 -17:34:32.5: ref_mag=13.28 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3623 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.18 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:58:32.77 -14:18:22.6: ref_mag=14.18 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.9717 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits at 21:33:44.27 -13:43:46.3: 11.80 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits at 21:12:30.88 -15:24:11.7: 11.97 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits at 21:51:00.73 -17:30:11.5: 12.34 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits at 21:50:41.31 -15:21:17.9: 11.96 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits at 21:50:53.18 -20:32:54.5: 11.55 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits at 21:01:27.73 -16:51:16.0: 12.31 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits at 21:17:34.68 -14:14:15.3: 15.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits at 21:24:23.46 -13:48:32.8: 13.21 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits at 20:49:52.84 -20:08:17.3: 15.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits at 21:01:44.27 -13:31:35.3: 13.06 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits at 21:33:44.27 -13:43:46.3: 11.82 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.81 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:33:44.27 -13:43:46.3: ref_mag=11.81 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0491 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits at 21:01:27.73 -16:51:16.0: 12.36 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.33 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:01:27.73 -16:51:16.0: ref_mag=12.33 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4940 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits at 21:50:53.18 -20:32:54.5: 11.58 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits at 21:51:00.73 -17:30:11.5: 12.38 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits at 21:17:34.68 -14:14:15.3: 15.30 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits at 21:50:41.31 -15:21:17.9: 12.01 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits at 21:12:30.88 -15:24:11.7: 11.95 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.56 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.36 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.96 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.99 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:50:53.18 -20:32:54.5: ref_mag=11.56 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4021 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:51:00.73 -17:30:11.5: ref_mag=12.36 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3820 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:12:30.88 -15:24:11.7: ref_mag=11.96 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2556 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:50:41.31 -15:21:17.9: ref_mag=11.99 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1701 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits at 20:49:52.84 -20:08:17.3: 15.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits at 21:24:23.46 -13:48:32.8: 13.20 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.20 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:24:23.46 -13:48:32.8: ref_mag=13.20 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2910 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits at 21:01:44.27 -13:31:35.3: 13.17 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.11 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:01:44.27 -13:31:35.3: ref_mag=13.11 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.1319 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits at 21:11:53.94 -13:43:28.1: 13.18 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits at 21:27:26.18 -16:40:12.4: 15.36 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits at 21:48:22.15 -22:41:14.4: 13.91 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits at 21:19:15.55 -14:14:14.0: 12.97 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits at 21:14:13.76 -14:01:30.7: 13.27 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits at 21:51:09.88 -23:00:25.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits at 21:13:18.34 -13:41:05.1: 13.43 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits at 21:51:18.96 -22:06:23.7: 14.10 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits at 21:11:53.94 -13:43:28.1: 13.09 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.13 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits at 21:27:26.18 -16:40:12.4: 15.44 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:11:53.94 -13:43:28.1: ref_mag=13.13 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.1865 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits at 21:48:22.15 -22:41:14.4: 14.08 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits at 21:14:13.76 -14:01:30.7: 13.30 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits at 21:51:09.88 -23:00:25.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:51:09.88 -23:00:25.4: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits at 21:19:15.55 -14:14:14.0: 12.99 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.99 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.29 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:48:22.15 -22:41:14.4: ref_mag=13.99 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.4376 delta=0.55 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.98 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:14:13.76 -14:01:30.7: ref_mag=13.29 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5165 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:19:15.55 -14:14:14.0: ref_mag=12.98 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3509 delta=-0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits at 21:13:18.34 -13:41:05.1: 13.52 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits at 21:51:18.96 -22:06:23.7: 14.11 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.11 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:13:18.34 -13:41:05.1: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.5951 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:51:18.96 -22:06:23.7: ref_mag=14.11 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.4728 delta=0.63 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits at 21:08:52.32 -13:20:10.5: 13.36 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits at 21:51:58.85 -22:25:17.4: 14.19 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits at 21:48:29.28 -22:56:25.6: 13.74 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits at 21:23:21.92 -13:31:58.7: 13.29 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits at 21:47:19.37 -21:52:40.4: 13.98 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits at 21:52:31.76 -18:06:36.3: 14.21 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits at 20:59:40.74 -17:38:23.0: 15.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits at 21:51:58.85 -22:25:17.4: 14.15 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits at 21:08:52.32 -13:20:10.5: 13.37 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.37 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.16 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:08:52.32 -13:20:10.5: ref_mag=13.37 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.5826 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:51:58.85 -22:25:17.4: ref_mag=14.16 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.6698 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits at 21:23:21.92 -13:31:58.7: 13.47 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits at 21:47:19.37 -21:52:40.4: 14.29 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits at 21:48:29.28 -22:56:25.6: 13.81 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.37 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.09 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.78 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:23:21.92 -13:31:58.7: ref_mag=13.37 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.7059 delta=-0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:47:19.37 -21:52:40.4: ref_mag=14.09 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.5972 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:48:29.28 -22:56:25.6: ref_mag=13.78 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.4838 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits at 21:52:31.76 -18:06:36.3: 14.17 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits at 20:59:40.74 -17:38:23.0: 15.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.19 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:52:31.76 -18:06:36.3: ref_mag=14.19 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.8910 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits at 21:51:23.31 -13:32:59.8: 14.20 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits at 21:49:13.90 -22:46:20.0: 13.78 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits at 21:51:57.17 -21:38:05.3: 13.94 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits at 21:51:19.50 -22:36:02.0: 13.99 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits at 20:59:55.31 -13:06:53.8: 14.10 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits at 21:51:44.44 -18:41:01.3: 14.15 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits at 21:51:57.17 -21:38:05.3: 14.01 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.98 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:51:57.17 -21:38:05.3: ref_mag=13.98 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.6028 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits at 21:49:13.90 -22:46:20.0: 14.05 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits at 21:51:23.31 -13:32:59.8: 14.45 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits at 21:51:19.50 -22:36:02.0: 14.22 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits at 20:59:55.31 -13:06:53.8: 14.04 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.30 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.89 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.07 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:51:23.31 -13:32:59.8: ref_mag=14.30 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.2048 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:49:13.90 -22:46:20.0: ref_mag=13.89 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.6268 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:51:19.50 -22:36:02.0: ref_mag=14.07 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.7327 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.07 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:59:55.31 -13:06:53.8: ref_mag=14.07 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.9229 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits at 21:51:44.44 -18:41:01.3: 14.14 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.15 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:51:44.44 -18:41:01.3: ref_mag=14.15 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.0292 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits at 21:52:18.63 -17:45:56.0: 14.72 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits at 21:52:29.08 -19:10:01.7: 14.15 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits at 20:59:46.93 -13:01:01.2: 14.09 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits at 21:05:14.73 -13:32:53.1: 14.23 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits at 20:50:44.70 -12:45:57.1: 14.18 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits at 20:50:14.37 -17:19:29.6: 15.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits at 21:52:18.63 -17:45:56.0: 14.51 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.60 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:52:18.63 -17:45:56.0: ref_mag=14.60 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.1081 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits at 20:59:46.93 -13:01:01.2: 14.02 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits at 20:50:44.70 -12:45:57.1: 14.66 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits at 21:05:14.73 -13:32:53.1: 14.06 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits at 21:52:29.08 -19:10:01.7: 14.13 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.05 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.33 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:59:46.93 -13:01:01.2: ref_mag=14.05 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.9189 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.13 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.14 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:50:44.70 -12:45:57.1: ref_mag=14.33 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.0156 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:05:14.73 -13:32:53.1: ref_mag=14.13 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.9915 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:52:29.08 -19:10:01.7: ref_mag=14.14 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.7738 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits at 20:50:14.37 -17:19:29.6: 15.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits at 21:14:45.36 -13:37:31.3: 13.96 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits at 20:53:54.84 -14:50:31.3: 14.45 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits at 21:21:59.06 -18:59:14.3: 15.29 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits at 20:53:43.91 -13:32:59.0: 14.18 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits at 20:55:21.17 -13:39:33.4: 14.20 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits at 20:55:21.17 -13:39:33.4: 14.51 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits at 20:53:54.84 -14:50:31.3: 14.29 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits at 21:14:45.36 -13:37:31.3: 14.07 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.31 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.35 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:55:21.17 -13:39:33.4: ref_mag=14.31 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.9235 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:53:54.84 -14:50:31.3: ref_mag=14.35 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.0631 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:14:45.36 -13:37:31.3: ref_mag=14.02 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.1793 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits at 21:21:59.06 -18:59:14.3: 15.36 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits at 20:53:43.91 -13:32:59.0: 14.57 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.31 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:53:43.91 -13:32:59.0: ref_mag=14.31 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.9682 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits at 20:55:18.04 -14:30:20.4: 14.49 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits at 20:53:54.62 -13:17:56.4: 14.36 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits at 21:08:44.40 -14:06:16.5: 14.10 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_02-20-46_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0826.fits at 20:59:57.28 -15:55:30.7: 14.57 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits at 21:08:44.40 -14:06:16.5: 14.36 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits at 20:53:54.62 -13:17:56.4: 14.52 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.20 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.44 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:08:44.40 -14:06:16.5: ref_mag=14.20 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.2316 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:53:54.62 -13:17:56.4: ref_mag=14.44 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.1301 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits at 20:55:18.04 -14:30:20.4: 14.45 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.47 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:55:18.04 -14:30:20.4: ref_mag=14.47 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.0764 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_02-18-07_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0294.fits at 20:59:57.28 -15:55:30.7: 14.72 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.63 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:59:57.28 -15:55:30.7: ref_mag=14.63 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.2296 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54656.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54736.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54768.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out55145.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out55350.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out55399.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54043_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 54043_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54050_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 54050_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54052_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 54052_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54057_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 54057_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54060_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 54060_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54062_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 54062_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54065_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 54065_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54066_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 54066_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54070_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 54070_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54074_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 54074_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54075_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 54075_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54076_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 54076_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54077_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 54077_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54078_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 54078_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54142_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 54142_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:44:44.13 -14:09:18.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54158_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 54158_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:24:09.93 -14:08:36.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54245_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 54245_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54339_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 54339_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:50:06.06 -16:50:26.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54508_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 54508_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54656_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
Preparing report for the candidate 54656_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54686_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 54686_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54688_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 54688_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54736_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
Preparing report for the candidate 54736_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54766_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 54766_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54768_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
Preparing report for the candidate 54768_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54813_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 54813_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54918_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 54918_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54919_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 54919_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54929_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 54929_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54973_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 54973_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55030_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 55030_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55058_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 55058_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55061_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 55061_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55075_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 55075_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55082_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 55082_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55098_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 55098_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55145_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
Preparing report for the candidate 55145_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55175_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 55175_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55180_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 55180_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55223_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 55223_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55240_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 55240_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55243_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 55243_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55247_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 55247_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55260_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 55260_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55268_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 55268_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55284_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 55284_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55291_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 55291_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55323_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 55323_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55335_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 55335_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55350_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
Preparing report for the candidate 55350_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55357_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 55357_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55363_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 55363_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55373_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 55373_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55399_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
Preparing report for the candidate 55399_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55404_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 55404_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55412_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 55412_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55445_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 55445_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55513_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 55513_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55570_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 55570_fd_Cap-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_04-59-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
