This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_033427_TTUQ1b1x1_944691_S1oMzbzN
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 09.3563 2461261.8563 12.82 04:24:52.49 +34:32:03.9
165.14247 -10.31437 galactic Per Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 4.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.980 Anacostia -0 0 1 12.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:24:52.49 +34:32:03.9: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:24:52.49 +34:32:03.9: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 09.3563* 04 24 52.49 +34 32 03.9 12.8 U Per 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461261.8563,12.82,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260809.3563 12.82CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 09.3563 2461261.8563 12.52 04:39:10.03 +27:12:22.7
172.80673 -12.90914 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 4.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.63 Ausonia -0 -0 0 12.5 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:39:10.03 +27:12:22.7: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:39:10.03 +27:12:22.7: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 09.3563* 04 39 10.03 +27 12 22.7 12.5 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461261.8563,12.52,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260809.3563 12.52CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 09.3563 2461261.8563 12.69 04:54:57.50 +26:25:41.4
175.68460 -10.65491 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.2" and 4.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASASSN-V J045457.44+262539.9
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.880 V 14.320 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:54:57.50 +26:25:41.4: 13.77 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:54:57.50 +26:25:41.4: 13.78 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.78 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 09.3563* 04 54 57.50 +26 25 41.4 12.7 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J045457.44+262539.9,2461261.8563,12.69,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J045457.44+262539.9 20260809.3563 12.69CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 09.3563 2461261.8563 12.58 05:02:41.69 +26:45:45.6
176.47570 -9.07520 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 4.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASASSN-V J050241.57+264544.4
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.143 r Y 0.949 r 2458511.68010 367.786662100000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:02:41.69 +26:45:45.6: 13.66 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:02:41.69 +26:45:45.6: 13.64 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.65 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 09.3563* 05 02 41.69 +26 45 45.6 12.6 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J050241.57+264544.4,2461261.8563,12.58,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J050241.57+264544.4 20260809.3563 12.58CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 09.3563 2461261.8563 12.73 04:59:43.70 +25:47:43.2
176.85652 -10.18738 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 5.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASASSN-V J045943.58+254743.3
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.000 V 14.140 V 2457229.12000 33.780000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:59:43.70 +25:47:43.2: 13.61 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:59:43.70 +25:47:43.2: 13.68 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.65 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 09.3563* 04 59 43.70 +25 47 43.2 12.7 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J045943.58+254743.3,2461261.8563,12.73,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J045943.58+254743.3 20260809.3563 12.73CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 09.3563 2461261.8563 12.61 04:37:01.62 +31:43:04.5
168.99995 -10.32642 galactic Per Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 4.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" NSVS J0437014+314309
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.855 r Y 0.462 r 2458422.85930 79.293675900000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:37:01.62 +31:43:04.5: 13.53 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:37:01.62 +31:43:04.5: 13.58 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.55 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 09.3563* 04 37 01.62 +31 43 04.5 12.6 U Per 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0437014+314309,2461261.8563,12.61,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0437014+314309 20260809.3563 12.61CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 09.3563 2461261.8563 12.47 05:19:11.59 +31:05:30.0
175.06894 -3.61574 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.9" and 5.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" NSVS J0519118+310534
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.225 r Y 0.223 r 2458387.99620 107.500079100000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:19:11.59 +31:05:30.0: 13.45 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:19:11.59 +31:05:30.0: 13.43 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0519118+310534,2461261.8563,12.47,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0519118+310534 20260809.3563 12.47CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 09.3563 2461261.8563 12.24 05:14:39.06 +30:45:32.5
174.77906 -4.60363 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 4.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J051439.07+304533.1
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.600 g Y 0.440 g 2458762.97800 43.740000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:14:39.06 +30:45:32.5: 13.35 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:14:39.06 +30:45:32.5: 13.32 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J051439.07+304533.1,2461261.8563,12.24,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J051439.07+304533.1 20260809.3563 12.24CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 09.3563 2461261.8563 12.44 05:24:36.21 +25:44:12.5
180.17815 -5.65466 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 5.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASASSN-V J052436.32+254411.4
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.240 V 14.820 V 2458415.78700 221.777847300000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:24:36.21 +25:44:12.5: 13.33 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:24:36.21 +25:44:12.5: 13.39 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.36 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 09.3563* 05 24 36.21 +25 44 12.5 12.4 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J052436.32+254411.4,2461261.8563,12.44,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J052436.32+254411.4 20260809.3563 12.44CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 09.3563 2461261.8563 12.10 05:11:39.32 +29:06:20.5
175.74945 -6.09402 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 4.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J051139.28+290621.4
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.500 V 13.980 V 2457698.10000 88.200000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:11:39.32 +29:06:20.5: 13.16 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:11:39.32 +29:06:20.5: 13.13 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.15 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J051139.28+290621.4,2461261.8563,12.10,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J051139.28+290621.4 20260809.3563 12.10CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 09.3563 2461261.8563 12.02 05:32:43.96 +29:02:52.8
178.40359 -2.32520 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 5.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" ASASSN-V J053244.17+290251.7
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.010 V 14.720 V 2458208.17080 91.692640100000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:32:43.96 +29:02:52.8: 13.12 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:32:43.96 +29:02:52.8: 13.09 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.11 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J053244.17+290251.7,2461261.8563,12.02,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J053244.17+290251.7 20260809.3563 12.02CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 09.3563 2461261.8563 11.74 05:36:03.55 +31:58:53.1
176.32596 -0.13340 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 4.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 4" NSVS 6979189
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
10.700 R1 11.100 R1 M6
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:36:03.55 +31:58:53.1: 12.85 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:36:03.55 +31:58:53.1: 12.78 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.81 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS 6979189,2461261.8563,11.74,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS 6979189 20260809.3563 11.74CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 09.3563 2461261.8563 11.40 05:17:05.66 +27:32:05.6
177.73421 -6.02560 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 4.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASASSN-V J051705.73+273203.9
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.610 V 13.000 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:17:05.66 +27:32:05.6: 12.36 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:17:05.66 +27:32:05.6: 12.35 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.35 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 09.3563* 05 17 05.66 +27 32 05.6 11.4 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J051705.73+273203.9,2461261.8563,11.40,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J051705.73+273203.9 20260809.3563 11.40CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 09.3563 2461261.8563 11.28 05:23:16.54 +34:41:27.8
172.59306 -0.86435 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 5.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" NSVS J0523164+344128
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.823 g Y 0.472 g 2458252.89280 382.780090500000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:23:16.54 +34:41:27.8: 12.29 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:23:16.54 +34:41:27.8: 12.28 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.28 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0523164+344128,2461261.8563,11.28,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0523164+344128 20260809.3563 11.28CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 09.3563 2461261.8563 11.12 05:27:15.20 +26:43:04.2
179.68945 -4.61609 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 4.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASAS J052715+2643.0
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.510 V Y 0.880 V 2452892.50000 110.995541000000 M7
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:27:15.20 +26:43:04.2: 12.09 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:27:15.20 +26:43:04.2: 12.11 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.10 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 09.3563* 05 27 15.20 +26 43 04.2 11.1 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J052715+2643.0,2461261.8563,11.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J052715+2643.0 20260809.3563 11.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.80049318 23.12.2025 07:12:32.611 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
First image: 2461032.80049318 23.12.2025 07:12:32.611 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Last image: 2461261.85655977 09.08.2026 08:33:16.764 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_033427_TTUQ1b1x1_944691_S1oMzbzN/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 15
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.59
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 15189
Objects passed selection criteria: 15079
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 10249.2
Average stars matched: 9948.5 (97.0656 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 244552 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Aug 6 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-190-gdf2934b0
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Aug 9 03:36:58 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.80049318 23.12.2025 07:12:32.611 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
First image: 2461032.80049318 23.12.2025 07:12:32.611 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Last image: 2461261.85655977 09.08.2026 08:33:16.764 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_033427_TTUQ1b1x1_944691_S1oMzbzN/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 229
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.27
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 19 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 116627
Objects passed selection criteria: 116322
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 79432.8
Average stars matched: 76219.8 (95.9551 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 578488 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Aug 6 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-190-gdf2934b0
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Aug 9 03:37:54 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_033427_TTUQ1b1x1_944691_S1oMzbzN/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_033427_TTUQ1b1x1_944691_S1oMzbzN/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_033427_TTUQ1b1x1_944691_S1oMzbzN/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_033427_TTUQ1b1x1_944691_S1oMzbzN/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461261.85605344
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits'
wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits'
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits'
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
Image size: 945.0'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:01.019 +29:59:57.99 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82
Second-epoch image center 05:00:01.019 +29:59:57.99
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0050 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
Image size: 944.9'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:01.910 +30:00:23.53 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82
Second-epoch image center 05:00:01.910 +30:00:23.53
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0125 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:00:01.019 +29:59:57.99
Second-epoch second image center 05:00:01.910 +30:00:23.53
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00779 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2nFmDGP7eB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits &> /tmp/tmp.VPIuwhj1cP
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_033427_TTUQ1b1x1_944691_S1oMzbzN/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits &> /tmp/tmp.A06Dk0Vkry
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_033427_TTUQ1b1x1_944691_S1oMzbzN/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_033427_TTUQ1b1x1_944691_S1oMzbzN/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JLI2P1u8wf
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_033427_TTUQ1b1x1_944691_S1oMzbzN/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 16295 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5633 to 84.6655 deg, Dec +24.3644 to +35.2863 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5633 to 84.6655 deg, Dec 24.3644 to 35.2863 deg
Loaded 8426 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6039 out of 6740 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6740 out of 16295 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.988300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.988300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.59
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.40
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.40
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 16295 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5633 to 84.6655 deg, Dec +24.3644 to +35.2863 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5633 to 84.6655 deg, Dec 24.3644 to 35.2863 deg
Loaded 8426 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6039 out of 6740 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6740 out of 16295 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 16349 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5633 to 84.6688 deg, Dec +24.3644 to +35.2864 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5633 to 84.6688 deg, Dec 24.3644 to 35.2864 deg
Loaded 8429 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6042 out of 6743 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6743 out of 16349 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 15 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
1.9 pix Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
3.1 pix fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
3.1 pix fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
15.4 mag. Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
13.3 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
13.2 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.2 (SNR ) 11.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.2nFmDGP7eB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_033427_TTUQ1b1x1_944691_S1oMzbzN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1498, bad_region=0, passed=16295
Got 16295 stars (including 14768 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16295 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4837 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4802 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4802 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4802 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16295 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4837 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4801 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16295 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4801 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16295 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4801 stars left (next iteration limit 5282)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits N_match=4801 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.415 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.267 n_q1=2038 n_q2=976 n_q3=1109 n_q4=678 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.114
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.VPIuwhj1cP (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_033427_TTUQ1b1x1_944691_S1oMzbzN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1486, bad_region=0, passed=16349
Got 16349 stars (including 14839 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16349 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4838 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4801 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4801 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4801 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16349 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4838 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4800 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16349 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4800 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16349 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4800 stars left (next iteration limit 5281)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits N_match=4800 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.414 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.273 n_q1=2037 n_q2=978 n_q3=1111 n_q4=674 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.129
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.A06Dk0Vkry (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_033427_TTUQ1b1x1_944691_S1oMzbzN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_033427_TTUQ1b1x1_944691_S1oMzbzN/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_033427_TTUQ1b1x1_944691_S1oMzbzN/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_033427_TTUQ1b1x1_944691_S1oMzbzN/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_033427_TTUQ1b1x1_944691_S1oMzbzN/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_033427_TTUQ1b1x1_944691_S1oMzbzN/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_033427_TTUQ1b1x1_944691_S1oMzbzN/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_033427_TTUQ1b1x1_944691_S1oMzbzN/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=141, bad_region=0, passed=4318
Got 4318 stars (including 4172 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4318 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013125 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010500 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4022 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3986 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3987 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3986 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4318 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4020 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3986 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4318 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3986 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4318 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 3986 stars left (next iteration limit 4384)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3986 robust_rms=8.664 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.160 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3986 robust_rms=0.576 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.701 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3986 robust_rms=0.505 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.578 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3986 robust_rms_before=1.567 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.493 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.505 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.623 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.578
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.623 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits N_match=3986 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.481 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.483 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.629 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.510 n_q1=700 n_q2=605 n_q3=1088 n_q4=1593 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.306
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_033427_TTUQ1b1x1_944691_S1oMzbzN/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.JLI2P1u8wf (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_033427_TTUQ1b1x1_944691_S1oMzbzN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_033427_TTUQ1b1x1_944691_S1oMzbzN/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_033427_TTUQ1b1x1_944691_S1oMzbzN/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_033427_TTUQ1b1x1_944691_S1oMzbzN/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_033427_TTUQ1b1x1_944691_S1oMzbzN/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_033427_TTUQ1b1x1_944691_S1oMzbzN/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_033427_TTUQ1b1x1_944691_S1oMzbzN/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_033427_TTUQ1b1x1_944691_S1oMzbzN/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=156, bad_region=0, passed=4310
Got 4310 stars (including 4148 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4310 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013124 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010499 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4000 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4310 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4000 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4310 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4310 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 3964 stars left (next iteration limit 4359)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3964 robust_rms=8.669 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.267 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3964 robust_rms=0.612 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.744 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3964 robust_rms=0.509 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.612 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3964 robust_rms_before=1.595 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.484 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.509 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.649 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.612
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.649 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits N_match=3964 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.472 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.488 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.629 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.502 n_q1=682 n_q2=611 n_q3=1066 n_q4=1605 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.332
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_033427_TTUQ1b1x1_944691_S1oMzbzN/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits sigma_overall=0.373 worst_q_ratio=1.114
ref2=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits sigma_overall=0.367 worst_q_ratio=1.129
new1=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits sigma_overall=0.481 worst_q_ratio=1.306
new2=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits sigma_overall=0.472 worst_q_ratio=1.332
reference average sigma_overall=0.37 worst_q_ratio=1.1215
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362_astrometric_residuals.png (4801 matched stars from wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363_astrometric_residuals.png (4800 matched stars from wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356_astrometric_residuals.png (3986 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.43 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357_astrometric_residuals.png (3964 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.44 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_033427_TTUQ1b1x1_944691_S1oMzbzN/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_033427_TTUQ1b1x1_944691_S1oMzbzN/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:24:54.49 +30:10:38.9: 10.96 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:24:54.49 +30:10:38.9: 10.97 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.96 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:24:54.49 +30:10:38.9: ref_mag=10.96 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.4160 delta=0.55 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21119_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 21119_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21127_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 21127_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:11.38 +35:13:59.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21163_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 21163_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:32.27 +32:10:42.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10074_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 10074_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:28.91 +29:40:50.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10680_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 10680_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:33.75 +29:20:54.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10738_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 10738_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:50:56.83 +29:41:27.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12406_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 12406_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:35:57.43 +28:30:53.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14084_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 14084_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:49.55 +26:38:07.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06441_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 06441_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:51:03.37 +32:09:53.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05706_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 05706_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:22.75 +32:28:51.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04242_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 04242_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:35.30 +32:47:41.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15814_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 15814_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:52:31.96 +25:38:36.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05941_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 05941_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:51.32 +32:03:08.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01618_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 01618_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:07.38 +34:08:57.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11604_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 11604_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:17.30 +28:36:21.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Aur-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_033427_TTUQ1b1x1_944691_S1oMzbzN/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_033427_TTUQ1b1x1_944691_S1oMzbzN/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_033427_TTUQ1b1x1_944691_S1oMzbzN/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_033427_TTUQ1b1x1_944691_S1oMzbzN/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
Image size: 945.0'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:01.019 +29:59:57.99 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82
Second-epoch image center 05:00:01.019 +29:59:57.99
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0050 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
Image size: 944.9'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:01.910 +30:00:23.53 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82
Second-epoch image center 05:00:01.910 +30:00:23.53
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0125 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:00:01.019 +29:59:57.99
Second-epoch second image center 05:00:01.910 +30:00:23.53
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00779 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits &> /tmp/tmp.30Jm1tFyi8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NJOWNiGWRG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_033427_TTUQ1b1x1_944691_S1oMzbzN/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits &> /tmp/tmp.BOh2cVXd13
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_033427_TTUQ1b1x1_944691_S1oMzbzN/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_033427_TTUQ1b1x1_944691_S1oMzbzN/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits &> /tmp/tmp.VtyKmmHYSU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_033427_TTUQ1b1x1_944691_S1oMzbzN/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 129003 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5559 to 84.6888 deg, Dec +24.3225 to +35.3000 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5559 to 84.6888 deg, Dec 24.3225 to 35.3000 deg
Loaded 8484 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4942 out of 6872 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6872 out of 129003 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.844750
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.844750
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.27
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.57
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.57
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 129003 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5559 to 84.6888 deg, Dec +24.3225 to +35.3000 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5559 to 84.6888 deg, Dec 24.3225 to 35.3000 deg
Loaded 8484 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4942 out of 6872 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6872 out of 129003 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 129055 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5633 to 84.6902 deg, Dec +24.3185 to +35.2955 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5633 to 84.6902 deg, Dec 24.3185 to 35.2955 deg
Loaded 8479 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4936 out of 6881 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6881 out of 129055 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 211 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.8 pix Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
1.9 pix Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
2.9 pix fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
2.9 pix fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
15.6 mag. Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
13.6 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
13.7 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.6 (SNR ) 13.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.30Jm1tFyi8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_033427_TTUQ1b1x1_944691_S1oMzbzN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=36, blended=14027, bad_region=9, passed=128967
Got 128967 stars (including 114713 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 128967 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4817 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4789 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4789 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4789 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 128960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4817 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4789 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 128960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4789 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 128960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4789 stars left (next iteration limit 5267)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits N_match=4789 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.266 n_q1=1871 n_q2=1035 n_q3=1152 n_q4=731 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.094
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.NJOWNiGWRG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_033427_TTUQ1b1x1_944691_S1oMzbzN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=35, blended=13827, bad_region=12, passed=129020
Got 129020 stars (including 114961 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 129020 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4819 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4791 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 129013 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4819 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 129013 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 129013 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4791 stars left (next iteration limit 5270)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits N_match=4791 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.254 n_q1=1874 n_q2=1046 n_q3=1148 n_q4=723 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.083
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.BOh2cVXd13 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_033427_TTUQ1b1x1_944691_S1oMzbzN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_033427_TTUQ1b1x1_944691_S1oMzbzN/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_033427_TTUQ1b1x1_944691_S1oMzbzN/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_033427_TTUQ1b1x1_944691_S1oMzbzN/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_033427_TTUQ1b1x1_944691_S1oMzbzN/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_033427_TTUQ1b1x1_944691_S1oMzbzN/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_033427_TTUQ1b1x1_944691_S1oMzbzN/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_033427_TTUQ1b1x1_944691_S1oMzbzN/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=1019, bad_region=18, passed=30838
Got 30838 stars (including 29755 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30838 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013125 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010500 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4801 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4763 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4765 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4763 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30838 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4801 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4762 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30838 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4762 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30838 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4762 stars left (next iteration limit 5239)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits N_match=4762 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.488 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.488 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.651 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.518 n_q1=822 n_q2=733 n_q3=1336 n_q4=1871 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.333
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_033427_TTUQ1b1x1_944691_S1oMzbzN/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.VtyKmmHYSU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_033427_TTUQ1b1x1_944691_S1oMzbzN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_033427_TTUQ1b1x1_944691_S1oMzbzN/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_033427_TTUQ1b1x1_944691_S1oMzbzN/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_033427_TTUQ1b1x1_944691_S1oMzbzN/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_033427_TTUQ1b1x1_944691_S1oMzbzN/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_033427_TTUQ1b1x1_944691_S1oMzbzN/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_033427_TTUQ1b1x1_944691_S1oMzbzN/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_033427_TTUQ1b1x1_944691_S1oMzbzN/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=963, bad_region=20, passed=31172
Got 31172 stars (including 30141 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31172 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013124 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010499 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4802 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4762 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4764 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4762 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31172 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4803 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4763 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31172 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4763 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31172 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4763 stars left (next iteration limit 5238)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits N_match=4763 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.489 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.477 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.633 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.522 n_q1=822 n_q2=731 n_q3=1339 n_q4=1871 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.294
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_033427_TTUQ1b1x1_944691_S1oMzbzN/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_033427_TTUQ1b1x1_944691_S1oMzbzN/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-32-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_033427_TTUQ1b1x1_944691_S1oMzbzN/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:05:16.53 +32:38:11.4: 13.36 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:24:52.49 +34:32:03.9: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:05:16.53 +32:38:11.4: 13.28 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.32 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:05:16.53 +32:38:11.4: ref_mag=13.32 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9074 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:39:10.03 +27:12:22.7: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:24:52.49 +34:32:03.9: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:39:10.03 +27:12:22.7: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:54:57.50 +26:25:41.4: 13.77 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:02:41.69 +26:45:45.6: 13.66 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:54:57.50 +26:25:41.4: 13.78 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.78 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:54:57.50 +26:25:41.4: ref_mag=13.78 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6574 delta=1.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:59:43.70 +25:47:43.2: 13.61 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:02:41.69 +26:45:45.6: 13.64 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.65 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:02:41.69 +26:45:45.6: ref_mag=13.65 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.5803 delta=1.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:59:43.70 +25:47:43.2: 13.68 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.65 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:59:43.70 +25:47:43.2: ref_mag=13.65 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.7111 delta=0.93 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:37:01.62 +31:43:04.5: 13.53 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:19:11.59 +31:05:30.0: 13.45 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:37:01.62 +31:43:04.5: 13.58 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.55 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:37:01.62 +31:43:04.5: ref_mag=13.55 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6099 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:19:11.59 +31:05:30.0: 13.43 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:19:11.59 +31:05:30.0: ref_mag=13.44 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4792 delta=0.96 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:14:39.06 +30:45:32.5: 13.35 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:24:36.21 +25:44:12.5: 13.33 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:14:39.06 +30:45:32.5: 13.32 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:14:39.06 +30:45:32.5: ref_mag=13.33 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.2415 delta=1.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:24:36.21 +25:44:12.5: 13.39 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.36 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:24:36.21 +25:44:12.5: ref_mag=13.36 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4385 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:11:39.32 +29:06:20.5: 13.16 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:11:39.32 +29:06:20.5: 13.13 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.15 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:11:39.32 +29:06:20.5: ref_mag=13.15 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0923 delta=1.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:32:43.96 +29:02:52.8: 13.12 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:32:43.96 +29:02:52.8: 13.09 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.11 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:32:43.96 +29:02:52.8: ref_mag=13.11 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.0171 delta=1.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:36:03.55 +31:58:53.1: 12.85 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:36:03.55 +31:58:53.1: 12.78 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.81 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:36:03.55 +31:58:53.1: ref_mag=12.81 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7410 delta=1.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:17:05.66 +27:32:05.6: 12.36 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:23:16.54 +34:41:27.8: 12.29 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:17:05.66 +27:32:05.6: 12.35 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.35 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:17:05.66 +27:32:05.6: ref_mag=12.35 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4087 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:27:15.20 +26:43:04.2: 12.09 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:23:16.54 +34:41:27.8: 12.28 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.28 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:23:16.54 +34:41:27.8: ref_mag=12.28 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.2791 delta=1.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:27:15.20 +26:43:04.2: 12.11 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:29:56.76 +30:51:46.5: 11.67 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.10 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:27:15.20 +26:43:04.2: ref_mag=12.10 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.1143 delta=0.99 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:29:56.76 +30:51:46.5: 11.67 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.67 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:29:56.76 +30:51:46.5: ref_mag=11.67 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.7828 delta=0.89 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out04186.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out100499.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out103686.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out105705.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out107352.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out112628.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out117508.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out151330.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out151386.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out40489.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out51302.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out57752.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out63609.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out84851.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out88379.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 7s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151103_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 151103_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151107_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 151107_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:43.22 +33:27:05.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151113_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 151113_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151118_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 151118_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151126_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 151126_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:11.39 +35:13:59.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151151_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 151151_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151164_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 151164_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151183_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 151183_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151184_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 151184_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151206_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 151206_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151233_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 151233_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:56:57.85 +33:05:59.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151235_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 151235_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151239_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 151239_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151245_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 151245_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:41:14.19 +28:37:41.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151247_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 151247_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151266_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 151266_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:18.09 +33:47:32.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151278_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 151278_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:07.77 +34:09:23.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151282_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 151282_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151284_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 151284_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:41.43 +34:26:43.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151291_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 151291_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151299_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 151299_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151305_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 151305_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151310_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 151310_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151311_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 151311_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:56:56.88 +33:06:50.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151323_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 151323_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151324_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 151324_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151327_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 151327_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:28.03 +34:07:49.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151330_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
Preparing report for the candidate 151330_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151349_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 151349_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:17.79 +32:33:34.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151360_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 151360_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:28.35 +34:07:22.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151361_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 151361_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151362_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 151362_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151365_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 151365_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:25.51 +34:49:31.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151374_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 151374_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:26.85 +26:55:00.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151378_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 151378_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:29.74 +32:42:35.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151379_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 151379_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:24:36.09 +34:06:49.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151385_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 151385_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:57:04.30 +33:12:24.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151386_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
Preparing report for the candidate 151386_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151390_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 151390_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:40:28.14 +30:16:50.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151394_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 151394_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:43.67 +26:10:36.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151396_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 151396_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151399_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 151399_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:33.76 +33:00:24.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151403_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 151403_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151416_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 151416_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:24:35.43 +34:07:14.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151418_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 151418_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151447_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 151447_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:14:46.54 +31:23:50.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151460_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 151460_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151484_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 151484_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151493_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 151493_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:51:22.08 +28:31:16.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151494_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 151494_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:40.71 +34:23:16.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151499_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 151499_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151500_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 151500_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151505_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 151505_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151508_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 151508_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151515_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 151515_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:33.13 +28:37:18.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151516_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 151516_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151519_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 151519_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151527_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 151527_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151541_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 151541_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151548_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 151548_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151550_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 151550_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151561_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 151561_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151565_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 151565_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151571_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 151571_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151575_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 151575_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151579_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 151579_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151592_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 151592_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151609_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 151609_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:28.64 +33:11:29.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151628_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 151628_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151644_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 151644_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:45.92 +26:25:45.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151646_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 151646_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:48:18.84 +29:47:15.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151650_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 151650_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:41:13.73 +28:37:09.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151657_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 151657_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151667_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 151667_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151668_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 151668_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151671_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 151671_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151678_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 151678_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:26:35.88 +31:24:01.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151693_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 151693_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151697_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 151697_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151698_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 151698_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151703_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 151703_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151706_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 151706_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151707_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 151707_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151712_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 151712_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151715_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 151715_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151716_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 151716_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151723_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 151723_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151727_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 151727_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151728_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 151728_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151731_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 151731_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151733_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 151733_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151734_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 151734_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151736_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 151736_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151737_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 151737_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151740_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 151740_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54309_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 54309_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:26.25 +31:29:48.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140722_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 140722_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:52.96 +30:33:46.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140767_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 140767_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:55.47 +30:10:41.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57253_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 57253_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:19.57 +31:18:48.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147846_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 147846_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57431_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 57431_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:54:58.05 +31:19:13.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39926_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 39926_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:12:02.85 +32:26:56.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 45640_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 45640_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:58:45.77 +32:09:05.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144772_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 144772_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:32.26 +32:10:42.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49173_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 49173_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104277_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 104277_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:50.96 +26:46:31.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07731_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 07731_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:02:26.21 +34:39:44.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64643_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 64643_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:01:21.13 +30:48:07.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112628_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
Preparing report for the candidate 112628_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61400_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 61400_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:02.68 +30:45:03.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105568_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 105568_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:47.43 +26:45:17.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46603_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 46603_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:14.15 +32:02:12.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09014_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 09014_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:16:15.57 +34:27:14.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103686_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
Preparing report for the candidate 103686_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113941_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 113941_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:57.69 +27:27:00.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16878_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 16878_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:41.94 +33:57:12.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105705_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
Preparing report for the candidate 105705_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96888_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 96888_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:09.00 +25:22:09.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49200_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 49200_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 123731_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 123731_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:45:50.77 +28:10:27.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97196_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 97196_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:04:49.36 +25:24:54.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121914_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 121914_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:38.54 +28:39:28.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96598_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 96598_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:04.47 +25:01:47.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110472_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 110472_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:31.31 +27:01:53.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103574_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 103574_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:46:44.55 +26:23:07.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51302_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
Preparing report for the candidate 51302_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46758_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 46758_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:41.32 +31:51:45.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33981_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 33981_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57752_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
Preparing report for the candidate 57752_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79725_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 79725_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88207_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 88207_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:52:40.56 +29:13:59.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121345_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 121345_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:03:15.51 +28:42:51.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63609_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
Preparing report for the candidate 63609_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100499_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
Preparing report for the candidate 100499_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126751_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 126751_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:39.53 +28:00:48.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117170_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 117170_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:22:53.72 +27:26:42.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76267_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 76267_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:39:02.45 +30:01:28.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34872_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 34872_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:02:27.11 +32:51:57.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12438_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 12438_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:44:41.47 +34:20:17.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20855_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 20855_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:23:15.64 +33:32:06.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58752_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 58752_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:25.67 +31:09:13.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88379_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
Preparing report for the candidate 88379_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84851_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
Preparing report for the candidate 84851_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34959_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 34959_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:01:05.11 +32:51:54.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66292_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 66292_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:30.23 +30:21:43.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84209_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 84209_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:29.74 +29:26:29.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91174_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 91174_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:24.12 +28:40:46.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101102_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101102_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:51:12.31 +25:58:30.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33728_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 33728_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:39:12.09 +32:54:35.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01960_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 01960_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:47.34 +35:02:59.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 40489_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
Preparing report for the candidate 40489_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03761_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 03761_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:30.50 +34:49:20.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89704_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 89704_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:35.81 +29:00:15.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107910_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 107910_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:07.37 +26:08:20.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06446_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 06446_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:48.85 +34:25:06.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95321_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 95321_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:54.59 +25:01:23.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103136_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 103136_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:14:36.64 +25:59:36.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33915_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 33915_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:35.91 +32:55:06.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70734_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 70734_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:25:49.93 +30:05:45.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 41372_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 41372_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:01:11.32 +32:26:11.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113106_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 113106_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:16.48 +27:22:15.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11714_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 11714_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:37.16 +34:02:26.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77691_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 77691_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:23.08 +29:29:46.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81496_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 81496_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:50:56.82 +29:41:28.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30241_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 30241_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:23:25.00 +32:57:13.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108616_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 108616_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:08.26 +27:03:20.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117508_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
Preparing report for the candidate 117508_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04186_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
Preparing report for the candidate 04186_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103810_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 103810_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:08:43.27 +26:03:11.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113795_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 113795_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:53:56.97 +27:28:00.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 44278_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 44278_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:51:03.38 +32:09:53.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128910_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 128910_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:18.61 +28:34:07.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111199_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 111199_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:52:31.96 +25:38:36.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107352_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
Preparing report for the candidate 107352_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39489_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 39489_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:22.74 +32:28:51.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08465_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 08465_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:00:49.65 +34:37:52.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58113_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 58113_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80620_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 80620_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:32:50.28 +29:42:39.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75123_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 75123_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:28.87 +29:40:50.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80722_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 80722_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:33.73 +29:20:54.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128113_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 128113_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:35:57.44 +28:30:53.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36697_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 36697_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:37:39.27 +32:37:27.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107779_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 107779_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:49.53 +26:38:07.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14221_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 14221_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:36:04.31 +34:10:41.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50196_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 50196_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:02.18 +31:50:20.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29397_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 29397_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:35.29 +32:47:41.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 40884_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 40884_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:51.33 +32:03:08.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09926_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 09926_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:07.37 +34:08:57.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33758_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 33758_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:52.73 +32:28:37.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96029_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 96029_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66692_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 66692_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:04:14.50 +30:29:38.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61154_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 61154_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:34.91 +30:47:50.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75122_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 75122_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:11:38.17 +29:54:11.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 122846_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 122846_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:45.08 +28:01:48.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119884_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 119884_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:52:47.30 +27:53:51.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53689_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 53689_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:49:13.04 +31:26:08.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25109_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 25109_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:56:59.65 +33:09:52.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72001_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 72001_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:10.15 +29:55:15.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33443_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 33443_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:24.09 +32:41:12.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78812_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 78812_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:21:12.55 +29:34:11.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28396_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 28396_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:43.12 +32:44:55.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53531_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 53531_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:38.33 +31:13:24.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21034_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 21034_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:10.42 +33:22:10.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94158_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 94158_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:58:09.41 +25:03:00.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97203_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 97203_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:16.44 +25:08:58.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88342_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 88342_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:17.30 +28:36:20.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04550_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 04550_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:38.71 +34:28:30.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12946_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 12946_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:00.78 +33:57:27.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37087_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 37087_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:43.58 +32:11:30.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67090_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 67090_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:08.20 +30:12:30.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16231_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 16231_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-09_03-33-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
