This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_023429_TTUQ2b1x1_4049503_QfgWPJ0z
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 09.2776 2461261.7776 12.79 20:44:49.14 +01:26:15.1
48.11429 -24.26639 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 8.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.478 Tergeste 0 -0 0 12.7 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:44:49.14 +01:26:15.1: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:44:49.14 +01:26:15.1: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461261.7776,12.79,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260809.2776 12.79CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 09.2776 2461261.7776 14.19 20:44:17.15 -01:33:34.0
45.18204 -25.65695 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 8.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.2000 Herschel 0 -0 0 14.4 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:44:17.15 -01:33:34.0: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:44:17.15 -01:33:34.0: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461261.7776,14.19,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260809.2776 14.19CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461213.85745615 22.06.2026 08:34:34.211 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
First image: 2461213.85745615 22.06.2026 08:34:34.211 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
Last image: 2461261.77794596 09.08.2026 06:40:04.531 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_023429_TTUQ2b1x1_4049503_QfgWPJ0z/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 9
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.69
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 14060
Objects passed selection criteria: 14012
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 11041.5
Average stars matched: 10170.2 (92.1093 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 238444 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Aug 6 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-190-gdf2934b0
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Aug 9 02:41:42 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461213.85745615 22.06.2026 08:34:34.211 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
First image: 2461213.85745615 22.06.2026 08:34:34.211 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
Last image: 2461261.77794596 09.08.2026 06:40:04.531 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_023429_TTUQ2b1x1_4049503_QfgWPJ0z/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 78
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.34
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 96 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 104635
Objects passed selection criteria: 104330
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 82950.5
Average stars matched: 76564.2 (92.3011 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 485808 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Aug 6 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-190-gdf2934b0
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Aug 9 02:44:09 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_023429_TTUQ2b1x1_4049503_QfgWPJ0z/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_023429_TTUQ2b1x1_4049503_QfgWPJ0z/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_023429_TTUQ2b1x1_4049503_QfgWPJ0z/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_023429_TTUQ2b1x1_4049503_QfgWPJ0z/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461261.77727703
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'asassn_transients_list.txt' -> '../asassn_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits'
wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits'
wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits'
wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:16.739 -02:00:45.89 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits
Image size: 936.9'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:17.038 -01:59:41.73 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:16.739 -02:00:45.89
Second-epoch image center 20:34:17.038 -01:59:41.73
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0179 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits
Image size: 936.9'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:19.584 -02:00:12.91 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:16.739 -02:00:45.89
Second-epoch image center 20:34:19.584 -02:00:12.91
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0150 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:34:17.038 -01:59:41.73
Second-epoch second image center 20:34:19.584 -02:00:12.91
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01369 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qaXUCBIa3u
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XrchzNST56
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_023429_TTUQ2b1x1_4049503_QfgWPJ0z/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LIVlbjQGtU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_023429_TTUQ2b1x1_4049503_QfgWPJ0z/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_023429_TTUQ2b1x1_4049503_QfgWPJ0z/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7glcVRmODO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_023429_TTUQ2b1x1_4049503_QfgWPJ0z/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits and wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits and wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits and wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 15674 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.7155 to 316.4598 deg, Dec -7.2812 to +3.2569 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.7155 to 316.4598 deg, Dec -7.2812 to 3.2569 deg
Loaded 10827 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8886 out of 9374 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9374 out of 15674 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.694350
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.694350
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.69
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.00
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.00
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 15674 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.7155 to 316.4598 deg, Dec -7.2812 to +3.2569 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.7155 to 316.4598 deg, Dec -7.2812 to 3.2569 deg
Loaded 10827 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8886 out of 9374 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9374 out of 15674 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 15695 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.7031 to 316.4361 deg, Dec -7.2626 to +3.2706 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.7031 to 316.4361 deg, Dec -7.2626 to 3.2706 deg
Loaded 10818 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8911 out of 9373 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9373 out of 15695 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 8 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
2.3 pix Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
2.6 pix fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits
2.6 pix fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.0 mag. Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
15.0 mag. Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 11.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.qaXUCBIa3u (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_023429_TTUQ2b1x1_4049503_QfgWPJ0z/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits' -> 'wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1089, bad_region=3208, passed=15674
Got 15674 stars (including 11577 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 15674 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4891 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4866 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13107 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4891 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13107 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13107 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 4866 stars left (next iteration limit 5352)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits N_match=4866 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.397 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.483 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.396 n_q1=1531 n_q2=830 n_q3=1646 n_q4=859 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.217
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits -region wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.XrchzNST56 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_023429_TTUQ2b1x1_4049503_QfgWPJ0z/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits' -> 'wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1034, bad_region=3247, passed=15695
Got 15695 stars (including 11591 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 15695 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4889 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4861 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13111 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4889 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13111 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13111 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 4860 stars left (next iteration limit 5346)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits N_match=4860 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.463 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.409 n_q1=1520 n_q2=826 n_q3=1643 n_q4=871 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.147
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits -region wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.LIVlbjQGtU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_023429_TTUQ2b1x1_4049503_QfgWPJ0z/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_023429_TTUQ2b1x1_4049503_QfgWPJ0z/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_023429_TTUQ2b1x1_4049503_QfgWPJ0z/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_023429_TTUQ2b1x1_4049503_QfgWPJ0z/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_023429_TTUQ2b1x1_4049503_QfgWPJ0z/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_023429_TTUQ2b1x1_4049503_QfgWPJ0z/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_023429_TTUQ2b1x1_4049503_QfgWPJ0z/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_023429_TTUQ2b1x1_4049503_QfgWPJ0z/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=723, bad_region=3020, passed=12785
Got 12785 stars (including 9208 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12785 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4823 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4823 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4823 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10442 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4824 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10442 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4824 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10442 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 4824 stars left (next iteration limit 5305)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4824 robust_rms=7.042 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=8.250 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4824 robust_rms=0.423 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.468 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4824 robust_rms=0.393 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.456 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=4824 robust_rms_before=0.667 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.426 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.423 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.512 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.468
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.512 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits N_match=4824 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.423 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.470 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.447 n_q1=1487 n_q2=986 n_q3=1419 n_q4=932 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.112
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_023429_TTUQ2b1x1_4049503_QfgWPJ0z/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits -region wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.7glcVRmODO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_023429_TTUQ2b1x1_4049503_QfgWPJ0z/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_023429_TTUQ2b1x1_4049503_QfgWPJ0z/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_023429_TTUQ2b1x1_4049503_QfgWPJ0z/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_023429_TTUQ2b1x1_4049503_QfgWPJ0z/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_023429_TTUQ2b1x1_4049503_QfgWPJ0z/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_023429_TTUQ2b1x1_4049503_QfgWPJ0z/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_023429_TTUQ2b1x1_4049503_QfgWPJ0z/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_023429_TTUQ2b1x1_4049503_QfgWPJ0z/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=735, bad_region=2996, passed=12772
Got 12772 stars (including 9223 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12772 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4861 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4820 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4820 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4820 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10449 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4862 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4822 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10449 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4822 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10449 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 4822 stars left (next iteration limit 5302)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4822 robust_rms=7.037 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=8.157 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4822 robust_rms=0.425 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.464 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4822 robust_rms=0.397 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.464 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=4822 robust_rms_before=0.667 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.419 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.425 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.499 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.464
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.499 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits N_match=4822 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.426 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.487 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.418 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.450 n_q1=1475 n_q2=984 n_q3=1428 n_q4=935 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.141
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_023429_TTUQ2b1x1_4049503_QfgWPJ0z/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits -region wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits sigma_overall=0.397 worst_q_ratio=1.217
ref2=Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits sigma_overall=0.404 worst_q_ratio=1.147
new1=fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits sigma_overall=0.423 worst_q_ratio=1.112
new2=fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits sigma_overall=0.426 worst_q_ratio=1.141
reference average sigma_overall=0.4005 worst_q_ratio=1.182
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370_astrometric_residuals.png (4866 matched stars from wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371_astrometric_residuals.png (4860 matched stars from wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270_astrometric_residuals.png (4824 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271_astrometric_residuals.png (4822 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_023429_TTUQ2b1x1_4049503_QfgWPJ0z/wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_023429_TTUQ2b1x1_4049503_QfgWPJ0z/wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aql-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:26:34.26 -02:32:31.6: 12.54 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:35:22.20 -02:00:10.8: 12.20 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:17:08.57 -04:03:06.8: 12.60 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:17:08.57 -04:03:06.8: 12.61 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:26:34.26 -02:32:31.6: 12.50 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:35:22.20 -02:00:10.8: 12.17 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.60 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.18 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.52 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:17:08.57 -04:03:06.8: ref_mag=12.60 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.8931 delta=0.71 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:35:22.20 -02:00:10.8: ref_mag=12.18 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1254 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:26:34.26 -02:32:31.6: ref_mag=12.52 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1093 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22731_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271
The candidate 22731_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22857_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271
The candidate 22857_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:38:15.11 -02:53:25.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22994_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271
The candidate 22994_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23023_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271
The candidate 23023_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04153_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271
The candidate 04153_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:22:53.17 -04:32:04.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11807_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271
The candidate 11807_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:23:54.88 +00:56:41.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11708_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271
The candidate 11708_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:29:21.59 +00:50:53.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12531_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271
The candidate 12531_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:21:17.85 +01:19:18.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Aql-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_023429_TTUQ2b1x1_4049503_QfgWPJ0z/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_023429_TTUQ2b1x1_4049503_QfgWPJ0z/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_023429_TTUQ2b1x1_4049503_QfgWPJ0z/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_023429_TTUQ2b1x1_4049503_QfgWPJ0z/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:16.739 -02:00:45.89 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits
Image size: 936.9'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:17.038 -01:59:41.73 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:16.739 -02:00:45.89
Second-epoch image center 20:34:17.038 -01:59:41.73
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0179 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits
Image size: 936.9'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:19.584 -02:00:12.91 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:16.739 -02:00:45.89
Second-epoch image center 20:34:19.584 -02:00:12.91
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0150 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:34:17.038 -01:59:41.73
Second-epoch second image center 20:34:19.584 -02:00:12.91
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01369 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits &> /tmp/tmp.tHJz2HFunD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits &> /tmp/tmp.EHFHgaFFiY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_023429_TTUQ2b1x1_4049503_QfgWPJ0z/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits &> /tmp/tmp.n9Yeedl8Jg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_023429_TTUQ2b1x1_4049503_QfgWPJ0z/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_023429_TTUQ2b1x1_4049503_QfgWPJ0z/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits &> /tmp/tmp.GfyciyuKLC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_023429_TTUQ2b1x1_4049503_QfgWPJ0z/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits and wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits and wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits and wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 116458 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.7115 to 316.4620 deg, Dec -7.2813 to +3.2588 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.7115 to 316.4620 deg, Dec -7.2813 to 3.2588 deg
Loaded 10831 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7959 out of 9785 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9785 out of 116458 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.544800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.544800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.34
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.20
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.20
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 116458 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.7115 to 316.4620 deg, Dec -7.2813 to +3.2588 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.7115 to 316.4620 deg, Dec -7.2813 to 3.2588 deg
Loaded 10831 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7959 out of 9785 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9785 out of 116458 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 116829 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.7020 to 316.4481 deg, Dec -7.2679 to +3.2723 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.7020 to 316.4481 deg, Dec -7.2679 to 3.2723 deg
Loaded 10830 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7953 out of 9799 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9799 out of 116829 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 68 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
2.1 pix Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
2.5 pix fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits
2.5 pix fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
15.2 mag. Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 14.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.tHJz2HFunD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_023429_TTUQ2b1x1_4049503_QfgWPJ0z/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits' -> 'wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=27, blended=9969, bad_region=16899, passed=116431
Got 116431 stars (including 90648 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 116431 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4874 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4858 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4858 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4858 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 103686 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4874 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4858 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 103686 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4858 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 103685 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 4858 stars left (next iteration limit 5343)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits N_match=4858 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.384 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.476 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.395 n_q1=1574 n_q2=897 n_q3=1525 n_q4=862 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.221
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits -region wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.EHFHgaFFiY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_023429_TTUQ2b1x1_4049503_QfgWPJ0z/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits' -> 'wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=29, blended=10115, bad_region=16944, passed=116800
Got 116800 stars (including 90836 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 116800 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4874 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4856 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4856 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4856 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 104005 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4873 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4856 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 104005 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4856 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 104004 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 4856 stars left (next iteration limit 5341)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits N_match=4856 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.478 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.387 n_q1=1556 n_q2=906 n_q3=1529 n_q4=865 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.217
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits -region wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.n9Yeedl8Jg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_023429_TTUQ2b1x1_4049503_QfgWPJ0z/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_023429_TTUQ2b1x1_4049503_QfgWPJ0z/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_023429_TTUQ2b1x1_4049503_QfgWPJ0z/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_023429_TTUQ2b1x1_4049503_QfgWPJ0z/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_023429_TTUQ2b1x1_4049503_QfgWPJ0z/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_023429_TTUQ2b1x1_4049503_QfgWPJ0z/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_023429_TTUQ2b1x1_4049503_QfgWPJ0z/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_023429_TTUQ2b1x1_4049503_QfgWPJ0z/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=6779, bad_region=14921, passed=81926
Got 81926 stars (including 62630 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 81926 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4857 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4828 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4828 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4828 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 70811 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4858 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4828 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 70811 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4828 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 70812 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 4828 stars left (next iteration limit 5310)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits N_match=4828 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.425 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.384 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.459 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.428 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.455 n_q1=1499 n_q2=961 n_q3=1474 n_q4=894 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.079
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_023429_TTUQ2b1x1_4049503_QfgWPJ0z/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits -region wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.GfyciyuKLC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_023429_TTUQ2b1x1_4049503_QfgWPJ0z/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_023429_TTUQ2b1x1_4049503_QfgWPJ0z/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_023429_TTUQ2b1x1_4049503_QfgWPJ0z/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_023429_TTUQ2b1x1_4049503_QfgWPJ0z/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_023429_TTUQ2b1x1_4049503_QfgWPJ0z/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_023429_TTUQ2b1x1_4049503_QfgWPJ0z/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_023429_TTUQ2b1x1_4049503_QfgWPJ0z/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_023429_TTUQ2b1x1_4049503_QfgWPJ0z/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=6841, bad_region=14974, passed=82692
Got 82692 stars (including 63303 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 82692 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4855 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4826 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4826 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4826 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71534 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4855 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4826 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71534 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4826 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71534 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 4826 stars left (next iteration limit 5308)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits N_match=4826 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.430 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.494 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.423 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.465 n_q1=1498 n_q2=955 n_q3=1475 n_q4=898 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.147
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_023429_TTUQ2b1x1_4049503_QfgWPJ0z/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits -region wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_023429_TTUQ2b1x1_4049503_QfgWPJ0z/wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-39-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0270.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-09_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_023429_TTUQ2b1x1_4049503_QfgWPJ0z/wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aql-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:23:07.75 -05:21:36.7: 13.84 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:31:54.23 +00:12:33.4: 14.12 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:18:52.40 +01:08:11.9: 13.75 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:34:12.41 +01:41:41.6: 13.39 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:42:55.37 -00:17:36.7: 13.72 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:36:09.27 +02:06:03.3: 13.84 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:41:11.36 +01:09:00.0: 14.34 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:50:38.51 -02:25:46.9: 13.79 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:37:00.11 +01:45:25.5: 13.78 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:36:09.27 +02:06:03.3: 13.81 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.82 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:36:09.27 +02:06:03.3: ref_mag=13.82 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9696 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:41:11.36 +01:09:00.0: 14.39 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:50:38.51 -02:25:46.9: 13.86 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:42:55.37 -00:17:36.7: 13.70 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:18:52.40 +01:08:11.9: 13.69 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:34:12.41 +01:41:41.6: 13.42 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.37 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:31:54.23 +00:12:33.4: 14.09 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:23:07.75 -05:21:36.7: 13.80 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:41:11.36 +01:09:00.0: ref_mag=14.37 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.3930 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:37:00.11 +01:45:25.5: 13.82 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:50:38.51 -02:25:46.9: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9264 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:42:55.37 -00:17:36.7: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0918 delta=-0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.72 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.41 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.10 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.82 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:18:52.40 +01:08:11.9: ref_mag=13.72 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9715 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:31:54.23 +00:12:33.4: ref_mag=14.10 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2498 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:34:12.41 +01:41:41.6: ref_mag=13.41 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6044 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:23:07.75 -05:21:36.7: ref_mag=13.82 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1044 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:37:00.11 +01:45:25.5: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0210 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:52:08.16 -04:30:00.4: 13.35 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:52:08.16 -04:30:00.4: 13.32 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:52:08.16 -04:30:00.4: ref_mag=13.33 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4907 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:46:56.76 -05:14:52.4: 12.85 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:28:14.68 -03:21:35.8: 12.37 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:28:12.34 -05:04:58.3: 12.58 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:47:29.27 +01:50:40.4: 12.53 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:44:49.14 +01:26:15.1: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:48:48.75 +02:01:21.7: 12.83 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:36:34.28 -02:33:10.5: 13.07 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:48:41.08 +02:03:40.3: 13.18 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:28:14.68 -03:21:35.8: 12.33 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:47:29.27 +01:50:40.4: 12.48 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.35 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:46:56.76 -05:14:52.4: 12.82 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:28:14.68 -03:21:35.8: ref_mag=12.35 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4128 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:28:12.34 -05:04:58.3: 12.56 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.50 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:47:29.27 +01:50:40.4: ref_mag=12.50 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5351 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.84 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.57 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:46:56.76 -05:14:52.4: ref_mag=12.84 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2294 delta=-0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:28:12.34 -05:04:58.3: ref_mag=12.57 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7655 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:44:49.14 +01:26:15.1: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:48:48.75 +02:01:21.7: 12.83 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.83 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:48:48.75 +02:01:21.7: ref_mag=12.83 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8543 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:50:06.40 +00:22:30.2: 13.48 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:48:41.08 +02:03:40.3: 13.20 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:36:34.28 -02:33:10.5: 13.03 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.19 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:48:41.08 +02:03:40.3: ref_mag=13.19 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2383 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.05 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:36:34.28 -02:33:10.5: ref_mag=13.05 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1325 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:50:06.40 +00:22:30.2: 13.46 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:50:06.40 +00:22:30.2: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4831 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:26:03.71 -00:40:07.6: 13.69 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:28:10.90 +01:22:20.1: 13.62 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:33:13.72 -03:28:49.5: 13.26 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:34:29.01 -05:50:57.4: 13.44 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:17:16.07 +00:20:31.1: 13.82 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:43:11.69 -00:06:51.5: 14.08 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:35:12.17 +00:19:59.1: 14.20 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:39:14.48 +01:40:27.9: 13.99 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:26:03.71 -00:40:07.6: 13.87 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:26:03.71 -00:40:07.6: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8273 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:28:10.90 +01:22:20.1: 13.67 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:34:29.01 -05:50:57.4: 13.55 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:28:10.90 +01:22:20.1: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7271 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:33:13.72 -03:28:49.5: 13.26 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.49 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:34:29.01 -05:50:57.4: ref_mag=13.49 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4570 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.26 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:33:13.72 -03:28:49.5: ref_mag=13.26 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.7292 delta=-0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:43:11.69 -00:06:51.5: 14.03 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:17:16.07 +00:20:31.1: 13.81 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.06 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:43:11.69 -00:06:51.5: ref_mag=14.06 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0171 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.82 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:17:16.07 +00:20:31.1: ref_mag=13.82 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9258 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:28:43.05 +00:10:06.2: 14.15 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:35:12.17 +00:19:59.1: 14.22 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:39:14.48 +01:40:27.9: 13.98 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.21 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.99 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:35:12.17 +00:19:59.1: ref_mag=14.21 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.0000 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:39:14.48 +01:40:27.9: ref_mag=13.99 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0252 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:28:43.05 +00:10:06.2: 14.18 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:43:35.09 +00:28:54.3: 14.07 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:26:03.53 +00:00:40.4: 14.09 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:24:21.08 -00:48:40.3: 14.01 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:43:36.14 +00:28:46.9: 13.94 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:16:49.33 -00:26:39.2: 14.05 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.16 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:28:43.05 +00:10:06.2: ref_mag=14.16 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.0185 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:24:37.16 -00:22:11.0: 13.98 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:16:49.33 -00:26:39.2: 14.03 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:24:21.08 -00:48:40.3: 14.03 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:16:49.33 -00:26:39.2: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0713 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:26:03.53 +00:00:40.4: 14.10 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:43:36.14 +00:28:46.9: 13.97 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.10 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:24:21.08 -00:48:40.3: ref_mag=14.02 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0841 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:26:03.53 +00:00:40.4: ref_mag=14.10 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.9902 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:43:35.09 +00:28:54.3: 14.06 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:43:36.14 +00:28:46.9: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0528 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.06 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:43:35.09 +00:28:54.3: ref_mag=14.06 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.1097 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:21:12.76 +00:27:28.5: 13.95 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:24:37.16 -00:22:11.0: 13.90 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.94 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:24:37.16 -00:22:11.0: ref_mag=13.94 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1245 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:47:53.12 -05:10:46.2: 14.14 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:44:17.15 -01:33:34.0: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:21:12.76 +00:27:28.5: 13.81 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:21:12.76 +00:27:28.5: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0237 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:20:50.32 -00:48:50.0: 14.10 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:40:29.68 -03:50:06.5: 13.98 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:33:53.75 +00:49:21.3: 14.18 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:33:06.57 +01:55:27.2: 14.84 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:44:17.15 -01:33:34.0: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:47:53.12 -05:10:46.2: 14.05 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.09 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:47:53.12 -05:10:46.2: ref_mag=14.09 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2451 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:41:39.52 -04:36:08.7: 14.48 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:40:29.68 -03:50:06.5: 13.98 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:20:50.32 -00:48:50.0: 14.19 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.14 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.98 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:33:53.75 +00:49:21.3: 14.49 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:20:50.32 -00:48:50.0: ref_mag=14.14 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.2007 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:40:29.68 -03:50:06.5: ref_mag=13.98 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.0921 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.28 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:33:53.75 +00:49:21.3: ref_mag=14.28 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.3138 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:40:01.02 +00:42:36.2: 14.69 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:33:06.57 +01:55:27.2: 14.79 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.81 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:33:06.57 +01:55:27.2: ref_mag=14.81 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5600 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:48:33.26 +00:01:53.2: 14.69 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:41:39.52 -04:36:08.7: 14.45 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.47 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:41:39.52 -04:36:08.7: ref_mag=14.47 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.5117 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:40:01.02 +00:42:36.2: 14.65 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:33:14.30 -03:29:14.5: 14.73 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.67 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:40:01.02 +00:42:36.2: ref_mag=14.67 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.3318 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:48:33.26 +00:01:53.2: 14.84 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.75 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:48:33.26 +00:01:53.2: ref_mag=14.75 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6564 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:45:44.57 -05:18:11.3: 14.70 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:18:08.16 +01:59:54.2: 14.79 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-34-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0370.fits at 20:41:47.86 -00:12:10.5: 14.58 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:33:14.30 -03:29:14.5: 14.38 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.50 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:33:14.30 -03:29:14.5: ref_mag=14.50 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.5474 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:18:08.16 +01:59:54.2: 14.89 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:41:47.86 -00:12:10.5: 14.45 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_03-35-21_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0371.fits at 20:45:44.57 -05:18:11.3: 14.76 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.84 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.51 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:18:08.16 +01:59:54.2: ref_mag=14.84 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6551 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:41:47.86 -00:12:10.5: ref_mag=14.51 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.7272 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:45:44.57 -05:18:11.3: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4921 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out139817.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out147891.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135867_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271
The candidate 135867_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135872_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271
The candidate 135872_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135878_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271
The candidate 135878_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135887_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271
The candidate 135887_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135889_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271
The candidate 135889_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135892_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271
The candidate 135892_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135893_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271
The candidate 135893_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135896_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271
The candidate 135896_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135904_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271
The candidate 135904_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135907_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271
The candidate 135907_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135910_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271
The candidate 135910_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:37:26.89 +02:11:30.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135915_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271
The candidate 135915_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135918_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271
The candidate 135918_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:17:30.52 -02:03:42.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135920_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271
The candidate 135920_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135926_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271
The candidate 135926_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138820_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271
The candidate 138820_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:21:35.73 +00:43:09.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138948_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271
The candidate 138948_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139023_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271
The candidate 139023_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139817_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271
Preparing report for the candidate 139817_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139897_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271
The candidate 139897_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:48:26.68 +01:44:38.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140240_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271
The candidate 140240_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141153_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271
The candidate 141153_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141648_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271
The candidate 141648_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141926_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271
The candidate 141926_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:46:55.79 -02:29:25.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142205_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271
The candidate 142205_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:35:30.68 +01:48:55.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142417_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271
The candidate 142417_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142498_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271
The candidate 142498_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:31:57.67 +01:21:10.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143270_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271
The candidate 143270_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144044_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271
The candidate 144044_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144767_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271
The candidate 144767_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144906_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271
The candidate 144906_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145770_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271
The candidate 145770_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145805_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271
The candidate 145805_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145891_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271
The candidate 145891_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145925_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271
The candidate 145925_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146559_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271
The candidate 146559_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146598_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271
The candidate 146598_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146629_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271
The candidate 146629_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146631_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271
The candidate 146631_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146702_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271
The candidate 146702_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:19:19.73 +01:35:26.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146863_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271
The candidate 146863_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147074_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271
The candidate 147074_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147170_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271
The candidate 147170_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147284_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271
The candidate 147284_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147328_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271
The candidate 147328_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:39:00.72 +00:55:55.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147891_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271
Preparing report for the candidate 147891_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147907_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271
The candidate 147907_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148010_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271
The candidate 148010_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148247_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271
The candidate 148247_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148797_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271
The candidate 148797_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149254_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271
The candidate 149254_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149422_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271
The candidate 149422_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:17:29.64 +01:48:35.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149816_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271
The candidate 149816_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149829_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271
The candidate 149829_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149988_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271
The candidate 149988_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149991_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271
The candidate 149991_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150009_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271
The candidate 150009_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150097_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271
The candidate 150097_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150115_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271
The candidate 150115_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54961_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271
The candidate 54961_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:27:18.72 -01:59:21.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93717_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271
The candidate 93717_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:30:25.22 +01:48:25.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108889_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271
The candidate 108889_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:24:20.09 +00:16:58.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53706_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271
The candidate 53706_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:27:21.49 -02:06:12.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86259_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271
The candidate 86259_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:29:24.02 -00:49:03.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26247_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271
The candidate 26247_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:22:53.18 -04:32:04.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98699_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271
The candidate 98699_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:21:17.85 +01:19:18.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102521_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271
The candidate 102521_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:23:54.87 +00:56:41.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103557_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271
The candidate 103557_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-09_01-40-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0271 did not pass the final checks