NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_042730_TTUQ2b1x1_511365_dRQ5EP1y

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields Dra-06-Q2b1x1

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 0

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field Dra-06-Q2b1x1 reference image: Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits
Field Dra-06-Q2b1x1 reference image: Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits
Field Dra-06-Q2b1x1 second-epoch image: Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits
Field Dra-06-Q2b1x1 second-epoch image: Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-24-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Dra-06-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Dra-06-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing Dra-06-Q2b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 438563 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 438563 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.png' -> 'transient_report/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits_preview.png'
Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits

renamed 'Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-24-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0250.png' -> 'transient_report/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-24-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits_preview.png'
Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-24-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 414.5746 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 496.5565 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1528.6701 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 317.5140 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1540.4495 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 313.0857 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 3.68732 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.014 INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 23.5300006866455 / [degC] Focuser temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_042730_TTUQ2b1x1_511365_dRQ5EP1y/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_042730_TTUQ2b1x1_511365_dRQ5EP1y/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_042730_TTUQ2b1x1_511365_dRQ5EP1y/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits Header: 67 keys total, 4 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-08T04:23:27.8855711' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-08T09:23:27.8855711' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61260.3912949651 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-08T09:23:37.7888709' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61260.3914095834 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 231.425899619497 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 62.0002036020702 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 15.6197222222222 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 336.191944444444 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 3.667059681888 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Dra-06' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '15 25 43' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+62 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20457 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20457 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 23.5300006866455 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 23.5300006866455 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 56: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 57: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 58: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 59: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 60: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 61: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 62: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 63: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 64: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_042730_TTUQ2b1x1_511365_dRQ5EP1y/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_042730_TTUQ2b1x1_511365_dRQ5EP1y/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_042730_TTUQ2b1x1_511365_dRQ5EP1y/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_042730_TTUQ2b1x1_511365_dRQ5EP1y/d_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits :) Spent 0.477123 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-07-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_042730_TTUQ2b1x1_511365_dRQ5EP1y/d_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 19899.553568 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_042730_TTUQ2b1x1_511365_dRQ5EP1y/fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=13115.0, right_median=15628.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_042730_TTUQ2b1x1_511365_dRQ5EP1y/fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 23.4599990844727 / [degC] Focuser temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_042730_TTUQ2b1x1_511365_dRQ5EP1y/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-24-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_042730_TTUQ2b1x1_511365_dRQ5EP1y/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-24-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_042730_TTUQ2b1x1_511365_dRQ5EP1y/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-24-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits Header: 67 keys total, 4 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-08T04:24:36.7218225' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-08T09:24:36.7218225' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61260.3920916785 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-08T09:24:46.6247677' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61260.3922062963 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 231.425899758096 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 62.0002036022148 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 15.5216666666667 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 336.292222222222 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 3.68902017274967 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Dra-06' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '15 25 43' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+62 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20457 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20457 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 23.4599990844727 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 23.4599990844727 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 56: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 57: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 58: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 59: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 60: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 61: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 62: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 63: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 64: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_042730_TTUQ2b1x1_511365_dRQ5EP1y/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-24-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_042730_TTUQ2b1x1_511365_dRQ5EP1y/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-24-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_042730_TTUQ2b1x1_511365_dRQ5EP1y/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-24-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_042730_TTUQ2b1x1_511365_dRQ5EP1y/d_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-24-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits :) Spent 0.485304 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-07-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_042730_TTUQ2b1x1_511365_dRQ5EP1y/d_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-24-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 19899.553568 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_042730_TTUQ2b1x1_511365_dRQ5EP1y/fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-24-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=13115.0, right_median=15628.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_042730_TTUQ2b1x1_511365_dRQ5EP1y/fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-24-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_042730_TTUQ2b1x1_511365_dRQ5EP1y/fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_042730_TTUQ2b1x1_511365_dRQ5EP1y/fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-24-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits


fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-24-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_042730_TTUQ2b1x1_511365_dRQ5EP1y/fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_042730_TTUQ2b1x1_511365_dRQ5EP1y/fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-24-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_042730_TTUQ2b1x1_511365_dRQ5EP1y/fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_042730_TTUQ2b1x1_511365_dRQ5EP1y/fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-24-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461260.89141071 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits' wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits' wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits' wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-24-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-24-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-24-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-24-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits' ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits Image size: 937.2'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 15:25:39.854 +62:00:40.61 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits Image size: 938.1'x624.5' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 15:25:40.335 +61:59:45.08 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 15:25:39.854 +62:00:40.61 Second-epoch image center 15:25:40.335 +61:59:45.08 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0155 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-24-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-24-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits Image size: 938.1'x624.5' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 15:25:36.648 +61:58:56.67 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 15:25:39.854 +62:00:40.61 Second-epoch image center 15:25:36.648 +61:58:56.67 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0295 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 15:25:40.335 +61:59:45.08 Second-epoch second image center 15:25:36.648 +61:58:56.67 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01526 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3pqHvkBMIF Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits &> /tmp/tmp.i6MhLkuLHs Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_042730_TTUQ2b1x1_511365_dRQ5EP1y/fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits &> /tmp/tmp.J4SGXlHzsi Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_042730_TTUQ2b1x1_511365_dRQ5EP1y/fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_042730_TTUQ2b1x1_511365_dRQ5EP1y/fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-24-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits &> /tmp/tmp.V00SF8OEb6 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_042730_TTUQ2b1x1_511365_dRQ5EP1y/fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-24-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits and wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits and wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits and wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits) and catalog (wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 8441 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 212.2366 to 250.7097 deg, Dec +55.9113 to +67.2630 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 212.2366 to 250.7097 deg, Dec 55.9113 to 67.2630 deg Loaded 7134 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4748 out of 4924 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4924 out of 8441 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.680200 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.680200 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.39 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.29 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.29
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 8441 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 212.2366 to 250.7097 deg, Dec +55.9113 to +67.2630 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 212.2366 to 250.7097 deg, Dec 55.9113 to 67.2630 deg Loaded 7134 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4748 out of 4924 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4924 out of 8441 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits (aperture=6.3) Read 8392 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 212.2365 to 250.7373 deg, Dec +55.9113 to +67.2631 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 212.2365 to 250.7373 deg, Dec 55.9113 to 67.2631 deg Loaded 7144 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4752 out of 4916 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4916 out of 8392 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits (aperture=6.4) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.3 pix Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits 2.3 pix Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits 2.2 pix fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits 2.1 pix fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-24-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.3 mag. Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits 15.3 mag. Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits 13.0 mag. fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits 13.2 mag. fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-24-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.0 (SNR ) 10.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.3pqHvkBMIF (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-08_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_042730_TTUQ2b1x1_511365_dRQ5EP1y/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits' -> 'wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=506, bad_region=1819, passed=8441 Got 8441 stars (including 6205 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8441 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4882 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4876 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7004 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4883 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7004 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7004 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Excluding outliers - 4877 stars left (next iteration limit 5363) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits N_match=4877 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.317 n_q1=1631 n_q2=927 n_q3=1506 n_q4=813 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.181 The image catalog is written to wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits -region wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.i6MhLkuLHs (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-08_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_042730_TTUQ2b1x1_511365_dRQ5EP1y/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits' -> 'wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=489, bad_region=1827, passed=8392 Got 8392 stars (including 6177 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8392 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4885 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4880 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6943 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4885 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6943 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6943 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Excluding outliers - 4880 stars left (next iteration limit 5368) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits N_match=4880 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.317 n_q1=1634 n_q2=924 n_q3=1514 n_q4=808 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.171 The image catalog is written to wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits -region wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.J4SGXlHzsi (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-08_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_042730_TTUQ2b1x1_511365_dRQ5EP1y/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_042730_TTUQ2b1x1_511365_dRQ5EP1y/fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_042730_TTUQ2b1x1_511365_dRQ5EP1y/fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_042730_TTUQ2b1x1_511365_dRQ5EP1y/fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_042730_TTUQ2b1x1_511365_dRQ5EP1y/fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_042730_TTUQ2b1x1_511365_dRQ5EP1y/fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_042730_TTUQ2b1x1_511365_dRQ5EP1y/fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_042730_TTUQ2b1x1_511365_dRQ5EP1y/fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=60, bad_region=67, passed=1428 Got 1428 stars (including 1303 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 1428 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.1' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.1 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013029 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010423 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 730 to 788 (Dec 56.2 to 67.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 1271 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1269 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1251 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1269 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1344 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 730 to 788 (Dec 56.2 to 67.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 1271 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1269 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1343 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1269 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1343 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Excluding outliers - 1269 stars left (next iteration limit 1395) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: the 1269 catalog matches do not cover the frame (691/199/317/62 per quadrant, need 79 in each) - keeping the original solution WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits N_match=1269 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.426 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.392 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.497 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.491 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.602 n_q1=691 n_q2=199 n_q3=317 n_q4=62 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.414 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_042730_TTUQ2b1x1_511365_dRQ5EP1y/fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits -region wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.V00SF8OEb6 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-08_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_042730_TTUQ2b1x1_511365_dRQ5EP1y/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_042730_TTUQ2b1x1_511365_dRQ5EP1y/fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-24-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_042730_TTUQ2b1x1_511365_dRQ5EP1y/fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-24-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_042730_TTUQ2b1x1_511365_dRQ5EP1y/fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-24-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_042730_TTUQ2b1x1_511365_dRQ5EP1y/fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-24-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_042730_TTUQ2b1x1_511365_dRQ5EP1y/fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-24-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_042730_TTUQ2b1x1_511365_dRQ5EP1y/fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-24-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-24-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-24-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-24-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-24-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-24-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-24-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-24-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_042730_TTUQ2b1x1_511365_dRQ5EP1y/fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-24-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-24-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=48, bad_region=62, passed=1335 Got 1335 stars (including 1226 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-24-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 1335 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.1' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.1 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013029 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010423 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 731 to 788 (Dec 56.2 to 67.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 1193 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1191 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1164 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1191 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1247 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 731 to 788 (Dec 56.2 to 67.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 1192 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1190 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1247 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1190 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1247 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" Excluding outliers - 1190 stars left (next iteration limit 1310) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: the 1190 catalog matches do not cover the frame (662/172/304/52 per quadrant, need 74 in each) - keeping the original solution WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-24-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits N_match=1190 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.452 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.419 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.513 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.491 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.626 n_q1=662 n_q2=172 n_q3=304 n_q4=52 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.385 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-24-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-24-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_042730_TTUQ2b1x1_511365_dRQ5EP1y/fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-24-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits -region wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-24-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-24-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits sigma_overall=0.339 worst_q_ratio=1.181 ref2=Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits sigma_overall=0.341 worst_q_ratio=1.171 new1=fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits sigma_overall=0.426 worst_q_ratio=1.414 new2=fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-24-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits sigma_overall=0.452 worst_q_ratio=1.385 reference average sigma_overall=0.34 worst_q_ratio=1.176 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215_astrometric_residuals.png (4877 matched stars from wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216_astrometric_residuals.png (4880 matched stars from wcs_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249_astrometric_residuals.png (1269 matched stars from wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.39 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-24-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0250_astrometric_residuals.png (1190 matched stars from wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-24-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.41 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_042730_TTUQ2b1x1_511365_dRQ5EP1y/wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-24-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-24-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_042730_TTUQ2b1x1_511365_dRQ5EP1y/wcs_fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-24-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Dra-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 No candidates found here Prepared the HTML report for the field Dra-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_042730_TTUQ2b1x1_511365_dRQ5EP1y/fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_042730_TTUQ2b1x1_511365_dRQ5EP1y/fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-24-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits Last image: 2461260.89141071 08.08.2026 09:23:27.885 UTC WARNING: VaST exited with code 1 on the field Dra-06-Q2b1x1 AFTER completing the measurements. This is a memory-management crash during cleanup (a VaST bug to report), NOT a wrong field / clouds / bad focus. The lightcurves were written, so the transient search continues. ____ VaST output (crashed during memory cleanup; the measurements above are complete) ____ --==VaST 1.0rc90==-- Parsing command line arguments... opt 'F': Will NOT create flag images for SExtractor opt '5': 5.000000 pix is the new fixed star matching radius! opt 'b': Using 500 reference stars for image matching! opt '3': Will try to select best aperture for each source! opt 'y': 0 SysRem iterations will be conducted! opt 't 4': robust linear magnitude calibration (vary zero-point and slope) opt 'x': 99 is the maximum acceptable SExtractor flag! WARNING: disabling the mag-size filter in order not to reject blended stars. opt 'u': Stick with UTC time system, no conversion to TT will be done! opt 'f': Run ./find_candidates manually! opt 'k': "JD" keyword in FITS image header will be ignored! INFO from vast_remove_directory(): Could not open directory: symlinks_to_images INFO from vast_remove_directory(): Could not open directory: converted_images INFO from vast_remove_directory(): Could not open directory: unpacked_images Checking the list of input images specified on the command line ... Looking for the list of input images with time corrections in vast_list_of_input_images_with_time_corrections.txt ... list not found. This is OK if you specify the input images on the command line, not through this text file. Checking write permissions for the current directory (/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-08_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_042730_TTUQ2b1x1_511365_dRQ5EP1y)... OK Found a system-wide installation of SExtractor Cleaning old outNNNNN.dat files. Done with cleaning! VaST was started with the following command line: ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_042730_TTUQ2b1x1_511365_dRQ5EP1y/fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_042730_TTUQ2b1x1_511365_dRQ5EP1y/fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-24-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits Preparing to process 4 input FITS images... ######## Forcing special settings for the transient detection ######## transient search mode: disabling the mag-size filter as it should be switched off when running a transient search! transient search mode: disabling the bad image filter as it will not help during the transient search! transient search mode: will not try to gues image saturation limit transient search mode: no UTC-to-TT time system conversion will be performed!!! transient search mode: setting the maximum acceptable SExtractor flag to 3 transient search mode: disabling rejectin of images with elliptical stars transient search mode: not discarding large sources ################ Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). Setting the fixed star match radius of 5.00 pix We have 4 images to process. SExtractor catalog cache: restored Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits catalog from cache SExtractor catalog cache: restored Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits catalog from cache Running SExtractor in 3 parallel threads... Using the catalog image00001.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits Using the catalog image00002.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits The gain value (GAIN=0.830) from default.sex will be used for image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_042730_TTUQ2b1x1_511365_dRQ5EP1y/fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits The above guess is based on the non-default gain value specified in default.sex by user Parent process says: we are done fork()ing. Waiting for thread 2 to finish... autodetect_aperture() is running SExtractor on /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_042730_TTUQ2b1x1_511365_dRQ5EP1y/fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) The gain value (GAIN=0.830) from default.sex will be used for image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_042730_TTUQ2b1x1_511365_dRQ5EP1y/fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-24-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits The above guess is based on the non-default gain value specified in default.sex by user Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). autodetect_aperture() is doing a preliminary SExtractor run to determine an appropriate aperture size sex -c default.sex -PARAMETERS_NAME autodetect_aper.param -CATALOG_NAME autodetect_aper_image00003.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_042730_TTUQ2b1x1_511365_dRQ5EP1y/fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits > image00003.cat.sex_log 2>&1 autodetect_aperture() is running SExtractor on /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_042730_TTUQ2b1x1_511365_dRQ5EP1y/fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-24-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). autodetect_aperture() is doing a preliminary SExtractor run to determine an appropriate aperture size sex -c default.sex -PARAMETERS_NAME autodetect_aper.param -CATALOG_NAME autodetect_aper_image00004.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_042730_TTUQ2b1x1_511365_dRQ5EP1y/fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-24-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits > image00004.cat.sex_log 2>&1 autodetect_aperture() is doing the main SExtractor run sex -PARAMETERS_NAME default.param -PHOT_APERTURES 4.8,4.8,4.3,5.3,5.8,6.3 -VERBOSE_TYPE NORMAL -CATALOG_NAME image00004.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_042730_TTUQ2b1x1_511365_dRQ5EP1y/fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-24-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits > image00004.cat.sex_log 2>&1 autodetect_aperture() is doing the main SExtractor run sex -PARAMETERS_NAME default.param -PHOT_APERTURES 4.9,4.9,4.4,5.4,5.8,6.3 -VERBOSE_TYPE NORMAL -CATALOG_NAME image00003.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_042730_TTUQ2b1x1_511365_dRQ5EP1y/fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits > image00003.cat.sex_log 2>&1 autodetect_aperture() is done with image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_042730_TTUQ2b1x1_511365_dRQ5EP1y/fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-24-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits Waiting for thread 1 to finish... autodetect_aperture() is done with image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_042730_TTUQ2b1x1_511365_dRQ5EP1y/fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits Done with SExtractor! TIMING SExtractor: 4 seconds Matching stars between images! No manually selected comparison stars file manually_selected_comparison_stars.lst which is fine. Processing /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits 9576x6388 FITS image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits Trying to guess the time system by parsing the comment string 'Time of observation (UTC)' Time system set from the comment to DATE-OBS keyword: 'Time of observation (UTC)' The input time system is identified as: UTC (blank if unknown) Setting observation date using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-06-08T06:45:27.9633564 Setting observation time using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-06-08T06:45:27.9633564 Observing time converted to the "standard" FITS header format: DATE-OBS= 2026-06-08T06:45:27.963 EXPTIME = 20.000 Using the catalog image00001.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits Exposure 20 sec, 08.06.2026 06:45:27.963 UTC = JD(UTC) 2461199.78168939 mid. exp. The reference image star 7902.419 35.223 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 8657.977 28.814 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 8632.574 28.345 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 8100.828 24.741 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 9230.644 15.946 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 8368.527 13.652 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 8592.373 15.213 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 9020.874 14.181 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 8947.060 12.022 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 9419.626 8.341 is rejected, see bad_region.lst Excluding more reference image stars falling at bad regions!.. (will not print them all) SExtractor output filtering results: * passed selection: 36415, (36415 good for image matching) * rejected as having no flux measurement: 0 * rejected as having SNR<3.0: 17 * rejected inside rectangles defined in bad_region.lst: 7005 * rejected close to frame edge: 168 * rejected as being too small (<1.2 pix): 0 * rejected as being too large (>4.9 pix): 0 * rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0 * rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0 * rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 68 * rejected due to an external image flag: 0 * rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0 --- You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'. Please note: the CCD position-dependent magnitude correction will be applied. get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -7.10 Detection limit from the magnitude-SNR relation= -7.1 (5.0 sigma detection) The simple faintest star detection limit= -6.4 80 percent brightest stars detection limit= -7.6 Selected detection limit= -7.6 Final detection limit= -7.6 (after subtracting MAG_TRANSIENT_ABOVE_THE_REFERENCE_FRAME_LIMIT=0.0) Parameter box for transient search: 10.04.9 pix): 0 * rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0 * rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0 * rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 78 * rejected due to an external image flag: 0 * rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0 --- You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'. 36410 * detected, using 499/ 500 * for reference/current image matching, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.016010, number_of_ambiguous_matches=583 refining the coordinate transformation... [CVPOLY iter 1: order=1 pairs=33787 inliers=33787 rms 0.43 -> 0.43 pix, max corner correction 0.1 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.015296, number_of_ambiguous_matches=557 33786 * matched, [CVPOLY iter 2: order=1 pairs=33786 inliers=33786 rms 0.42 -> 0.42 pix, max corner correction 0.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.009200, number_of_ambiguous_matches=335 33773 * matched (2nd iteration). [CVPOLY iter 3: order=1 pairs=33773 inliers=33773 rms 0.36 -> 0.36 pix, max corner correction 0.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.003240, number_of_ambiguous_matches=118 33731 * matched (3rd iteration). Success! rotation [degrees] = 0.012 36410 stars detected, 33731 stars matched Performing magnitude calibration using automatically selected comparison stars Expecting to find at least 40 * for magnitude calibration We have N_good_stars = 32118, N_manually_selected_comparison_stars = 0 Using 32118 stars for magnitude calibration (before filtering). Iteratively removing outliers from the linear mag-mag relation (unweighted fit)... After removing outliers in (X,Y,dm) plane, we are left with 32114 stars for magnitude calibration. Using the linear CCD position-dependent magnitude correction: delta_m = -0.00000*X_pix +0.00000*Y_pix -0.00286 Iteratively removing outliers from the mag-mag relation (weighted linear/polynomial fit)... Computing robust linear magnitude calibration. Used 30293 stars for magnitude calibration (after filtering). get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -7.10 39094 objects stored in memory (1000000 max.) Magnitude calibration is performed successfully! Saving observations to the cache... OK memory: 226316 kB used, 259440 kB peak, 65263848 kB available RAM processed 2 of 4 images ( 50.0%) Processing /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_042730_TTUQ2b1x1_511365_dRQ5EP1y/fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits 9576x6388 FITS image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_042730_TTUQ2b1x1_511365_dRQ5EP1y/fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits Trying to guess the time system by parsing the comment string 'Time of observation (UTC)' Time system set from the comment to DATE-OBS keyword: 'Time of observation (UTC)' The input time system is identified as: UTC (blank if unknown) Setting observation date using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-08-08T09:23:27.8855711 Setting observation time using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-08-08T09:23:27.8855711 Observing time converted to the "standard" FITS header format: DATE-OBS= 2026-08-08T09:23:27.885 EXPTIME = 20.000 Using the catalog image00003.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_042730_TTUQ2b1x1_511365_dRQ5EP1y/fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits The star 7518.785 7.470 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 8334.693 28.298 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 7550.647 31.673 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 7952.052 71.951 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 8221.907 76.816 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 7963.525 76.676 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 7829.224 73.222 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 7780.655 70.479 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 7545.272 97.301 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 7668.247 120.626 is rejected, see bad_region.lst Excluding more stars falling at bad regions!.. (will not print them all) SExtractor output filtering results: * passed selection: 9092 * rejected as having no flux measurement: 0 * rejected as having SNR<3.0: 0 * rejected inside rectangles defined in bad_region.lst: 324 * rejected close to frame edge: 57 * rejected as being too small (<1.2 pix): 0 * rejected as being too large (>4.9 pix): 0 * rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0 * rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0 * rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 22 * rejected due to an external image flag: 0 * rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0 --- You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'. 9092 * detected, using 124/ 500 * for reference/current image matching, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000281, number_of_ambiguous_matches=11 refining the coordinate transformation... [CVPOLY iter 1: order=3 pairs=8803 inliers=8803 rms 1.11 -> 0.32 pix, max corner correction 14.8 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000230, number_of_ambiguous_matches=9 8805 * matched, [CVPOLY iter 2: order=1 pairs=8805 inliers=8805 rms 0.31 -> 0.31 pix, max corner correction 0.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000128, number_of_ambiguous_matches=5 8803 * matched (2nd iteration). [CVPOLY iter 3: order=1 pairs=8803 inliers=8803 rms 0.23 -> 0.23 pix, max corner correction 0.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000128, number_of_ambiguous_matches=5 8801 * matched (3rd iteration). Success! rotation [degrees] = 2.225 9092 stars detected, 8801 stars matched Performing magnitude calibration using automatically selected comparison stars Expecting to find at least 40 * for magnitude calibration We have N_good_stars = 7987, N_manually_selected_comparison_stars = 0 Using 7987 stars for magnitude calibration (before filtering). Iteratively removing outliers from the linear mag-mag relation (unweighted fit)... After removing outliers in (X,Y,dm) plane, we are left with 6625 stars for magnitude calibration. Using the linear CCD position-dependent magnitude correction: delta_m = 0.00020*X_pix +0.00022*Y_pix -1.01465 ERROR in magnitude calibration: fabs(lin_mag_A * X_im_size + lin_mag_B * Y_im_size + lin_mag_C) > MAX_LIN_CORR_MAG Used 6625 stars for magnitude calibration (after filtering). get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -7.61  ERROR!!! Magnitude calibration failure. Dropping image.  39094 objects stored in memory (1000000 max.) memory: 220532 kB used, 259440 kB peak, 65263848 kB available RAM processed 3 of 4 images ( 75.0%) Processing /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_042730_TTUQ2b1x1_511365_dRQ5EP1y/fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-24-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits 9576x6388 FITS image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_042730_TTUQ2b1x1_511365_dRQ5EP1y/fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-24-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits Trying to guess the time system by parsing the comment string 'Time of observation (UTC)' Time system set from the comment to DATE-OBS keyword: 'Time of observation (UTC)' The input time system is identified as: UTC (blank if unknown) Setting observation date using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-08-08T09:24:36.7218225 Setting observation time using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-08-08T09:24:36.7218225 Observing time converted to the "standard" FITS header format: DATE-OBS= 2026-08-08T09:24:36.721 EXPTIME = 20.000 Using the catalog image00004.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_042730_TTUQ2b1x1_511365_dRQ5EP1y/fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-24-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits The star 7546.602 23.807 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 8330.491 20.359 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 8217.470 69.053 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 7948.279 64.814 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 7541.418 89.605 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 7663.508 112.628 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 8826.003 133.976 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 7533.394 168.028 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 9481.659 190.012 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 7517.907 230.216 is rejected, see bad_region.lst Excluding more stars falling at bad regions!.. (will not print them all) SExtractor output filtering results: * passed selection: 8673 * rejected as having no flux measurement: 0 * rejected as having SNR<3.0: 2 * rejected inside rectangles defined in bad_region.lst: 322 * rejected close to frame edge: 50 * rejected as being too small (<1.2 pix): 0 * rejected as being too large (>4.8 pix): 0 * rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0 * rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0 * rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 21 * rejected due to an external image flag: 0 * rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0 --- You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'. 8673 * detected, using 119/ 500 * for reference/current image matching, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000307, number_of_ambiguous_matches=12 refining the coordinate transformation... [CVPOLY iter 1: order=3 pairs=8384 inliers=8384 rms 1.30 -> 0.32 pix, max corner correction 15.2 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000256, number_of_ambiguous_matches=10 8388 * matched, [CVPOLY iter 2: order=1 pairs=8388 inliers=8388 rms 0.31 -> 0.31 pix, max corner correction 0.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000179, number_of_ambiguous_matches=7 8386 * matched (2nd iteration). [CVPOLY iter 3: order=1 pairs=8386 inliers=8386 rms 0.25 -> 0.25 pix, max corner correction 0.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000102, number_of_ambiguous_matches=4 8385 * matched (3rd iteration). Success! rotation [degrees] = 2.218 8673 stars detected, 8385 stars matched Performing magnitude calibration using automatically selected comparison stars Expecting to find at least 40 * for magnitude calibration We have N_good_stars = 7601, N_manually_selected_comparison_stars = 0 Using 7601 stars for magnitude calibration (before filtering). Iteratively removing outliers from the linear mag-mag relation (unweighted fit)... After removing outliers in (X,Y,dm) plane, we are left with 6220 stars for magnitude calibration. Using the linear CCD position-dependent magnitude correction: delta_m = 0.00019*X_pix +0.00021*Y_pix -0.96126 ERROR in magnitude calibration: fabs(lin_mag_A * X_im_size + lin_mag_B * Y_im_size + lin_mag_C) > MAX_LIN_CORR_MAG Used 6220 stars for magnitude calibration (after filtering). get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -7.60  ERROR!!! Magnitude calibration failure. Dropping image.  39094 objects stored in memory (1000000 max.) memory: 220532 kB used, 259440 kB peak, 65263848 kB available RAM processed 4 of 4 images (100.0%) TIMING matching_and_photometry: 1 seconds Done with measurements! =) Total number of measurements 72825 (72825 measurements stored in RAM) Freeing up some memory... Sorting the measurements cached in memory... Writing lightcurve (outNNNNN.dat) files... TIMING lightcurve_write: 0 seconds The lightcurve files have been written, freeing up more memory... Creating vast_image_details.log ... Writing summary file: vast_summary.log ... OK Selecting the best aperture for each source Aperture with index 0 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.00*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 6033 stars Aperture with index 1 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.00*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 0 stars Aperture with index 2 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER -0.10*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 9679 stars Aperture with index 3 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.10*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 5774 stars Aperture with index 4 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.20*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 4112 stars Aperture with index 5 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.30*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 8133 stars done! =) TIMING select_aperture: 1 seconds Computing lightcurve statistics... Will not compute variability indexes for objects having <1 points in lightcurve You may disable this by commenting out the line '#define DROP_LIGHTCURVES_WITH_SMALL_NUMBER_OF_POINTS_FROM_ALL_PLOTS' in src/vast_limits.h an re-compiling VaST with 'make' Computing, please wait a bit ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... vast_lightcurve_statistics.log: 33555 objects, the longest string is 384 bytes. Allocating memory for resorting the file. ----***** VaST processing WARNING *****---- You asked VaST to process 4 images, but only 1 were actually matched to the reference one. Please investigate this! ************************************************************** This error might be a bug, but it is far more likely that it is caused by inappropriate input data. A few simple things to check in the diagnostic messages printed above (or the vast*.log files): * How many of the input images are matched? * Does the number of detected stars on each image look reasonable? * Do images have a sufficient overlap of at least about 20 percent? You may run ./sextract_single_image /path/to/my/image/file.fit to see how well VaST detects stars with the current SExtractor settings (star detection settings can be changed in the default.sex configuration file, see various examples in the VaST directory). If you cannot identify the problem, please e-mail Kirill Sokolovsky Please try to describe the problem in details and, if possible, attach vast_summary.log file and a few example images. If the images are too big to be sent by e-mail, please upload them through a web-form http://scan.sai.msu.ru/upload/ ************************************************************** Low percentage of matched images - we'll declare this an unsuccessful VaST run (exit code 1) _____________________ SExtractor catalog cache: saved Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_042730_TTUQ2b1x1_511365_dRQ5EP1y/fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_042730_TTUQ2b1x1_511365_dRQ5EP1y/fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-24-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits Last image: 2461260.89141071 08.08.2026 09:23:27.885 UTC ERROR running VaST on the field Dra-06-Q2b1x1 (less than 4 images processed) exp_start= 08.06.2026 06:45:27.963 exp= 20.000 JD= 2461199.78168939 ap= 4.9 rotation= 0.000 *detected= 36415 *matched= 36415 status=OK /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-45-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0215.fits exp_start= 08.06.2026 06:46:13.663 exp= 20.000 JD= 2461199.78221832 ap= 4.9 rotation= 0.012 *detected= 36410 *matched= 33731 status=OK /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-08_01-46-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0216.fits exp_start= 08.08.2026 09:23:27.885 exp= 20.000 JD= 2461260.89141071 ap= 4.9 rotation= 2.225 *detected= 9092 *matched= 8801 status=ERROR /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_042730_TTUQ2b1x1_511365_dRQ5EP1y/fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-23-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits exp_start= 08.08.2026 09:24:36.721 exp= 20.000 JD= 2461260.89220742 ap= 4.8 rotation= 2.218 *detected= 8673 *matched= 8385 status=ERROR /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_042730_TTUQ2b1x1_511365_dRQ5EP1y/fd_Dra-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-08_04-24-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits ########### Completed Dra-06-Q2b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### ################################################################################### renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461260.89141071 -observatory V36 07:58:40.00 +20:20:06.8 Mercury (-0.6mag) 12:03:23.25 -01:07:39.9 Venus (-4.3mag) 05:49:46.22 +23:36:29.8 Mars (1.3mag) 08:43:05.75 +18:40:43.8 Jupiter (-1.8mag) 00:56:24.47 +03:15:16.4 Saturn (0.6mag) 04:11:45.13 +20:57:00.6 Uranus (5.8mag) 00:16:05.47 +00:13:05.1 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:28:07.48 -23:30:14.9 Pluto (14.4mag) 05:00:35.02 +27:18:08.2 Moon (-9.6mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Aug 8 04:29 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461260.89141071: 08:43:05.10 +18:40:46.5 Io (6.0mag) 08:43:16.10 +18:39:59.8 Europa (6.3mag) 08:43:22.94 +18:39:29.7 Ganymede (5.6mag) 08:43:13.46 +18:40:14.9 Callisto (6.8mag) 08:40:39.26 +18:40:12.7 Himalia (15.7mag) 08:43:05.62 +18:40:44.9 Thebe (16.6mag) 08:40:11.34 +18:38:42.2 Elara (17.7mag) 08:47:12.75 +18:20:07.0 Pasiphae (17.9mag) 08:46:15.96 +18:51:02.4 Carme (19.0mag) 00:56:13.42 +03:15:35.5 Titan (8.4mag) 00:56:28.74 +03:15:02.0 Rhea (9.7mag) 00:56:34.30 +03:14:02.8 Iapetus (11.1mag) 00:56:10.05 +03:15:07.7 Hyperion (14.4mag) 00:55:46.68 +03:08:25.8 Phoebe (16.5mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Aug 8 04:30 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461260.89141071: 19:03:16.73 -22:55:53.2 JWST 15:59:52.81 +48:45:03.5 Chandra 11:04:25.00 -59:44:33.7 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Aug 8 04:29 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461260.89141071 -observatory V36 03:13:52.83 +17:23:34.4 17.6mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 18:01:44.50 -34:37:39.0 14.0mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 06:53:56.85 -68:54:23.5 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:09:52.10 +32:59:48.9 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 03:44:15.88 +37:44:35.1 16.8mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 22:38:29.98 +31:26:24.4 17.3mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 06:43:39.58 +26:32:19.0 16.8mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 10:21:43.42 +28:27:42.8 17.0mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 09:28:58.51 +05:18:07.2 17.9mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 15:12:29.49 -12:17:28.6 17.9mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS) 21:10:30.68 +65:59:59.1 17.9mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon) 15:47:39.53 -12:57:08.7 14.4mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 08:08:17.60 +31:21:12.9 15.3mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:06:55.34 +15:36:34.1 17.7mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 19:02:54.47 +43:05:46.5 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 21:10:28.91 +49:13:13.4 17.6mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS) 05:15:16.83 -12:57:56.8 15.5mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 06:56:20.96 +24:07:39.0 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 07:30:53.86 -16:09:45.6 17.8mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS) 10:33:07.50 +20:53:44.9 17.3mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 12:58:13.35 +02:20:23.2 17.0mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 16:03:01.06 +77:49:05.6 16.8mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 03:07:34.20 +46:11:29.4 17.1mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 11:46:55.47 +08:34:03.6 17.3mag A/2026 E1 21:58:32.05 -27:22:29.0 6.9mag 10P/Tempel 11:29:03.43 -03:24:31.1 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 04:39:27.75 +32:27:48.6 18.0mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson 11:08:02.25 +04:35:11.0 17.3mag 63P/Wild 00:54:12.95 -05:27:16.5 15.4mag 65P/Gunn 05:35:56.64 +20:41:53.3 13.7mag 78P/Gehrels 20:37:48.93 -23:32:42.4 17.8mag 84P/Giclas 03:00:55.61 +13:42:22.1 16.7mag 88P/Howell 07:56:21.05 +27:38:23.1 16.2mag 93P/Lovas 04:06:47.37 +16:56:14.9 17.6mag 112P/Urata-Niijima 05:57:03.22 +30:17:54.5 16.3mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 09:18:54.31 +26:37:23.7 15.0mag 123P/West-Hartley 11:44:03.10 -10:20:01.8 17.1mag 124P/Mrkos 05:36:49.02 +21:10:51.4 16.1mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 06:28:49.13 +18:53:39.6 17.9mag 131P/Mueller 00:03:22.69 +03:24:24.4 17.6mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma 03:20:11.30 -19:10:42.6 13.8mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 07:16:46.35 +37:48:58.8 15.8mag 162P/SidingSpring 15:10:06.71 +40:59:20.8 12.2mag 169P/NEAT 02:43:20.35 +09:31:04.1 17.6mag 220P/McNaught 16:41:39.80 -10:06:02.3 17.7mag 235P/LINEAR 20:22:14.52 -52:50:11.8 17.8mag 259P/Garradd 03:22:36.74 +25:14:38.7 15.4mag 260P/McNaught 07:05:54.03 +37:42:54.1 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR 15:10:31.22 +03:07:15.5 17.7mag 391P/Kowalski 09:01:02.61 +18:22:06.0 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.5K Aug 8 04:29 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08 22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17 14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02 12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61 16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09 01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97 21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13 18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06 12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98 13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38 18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63 14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15 20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53 19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82 19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31 17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67 19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52 18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92 19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91 19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81 04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96 13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01 16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07 10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63 14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62 13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09 00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13 11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56 21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14 17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72 14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53 20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4 15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57 23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64 17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15 00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20 AT2026ntk 2026-06-18.09 17.34 20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93 23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83 02:02:26.67 +32:04:22.70 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.6 15.52 21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05 17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62 13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24 00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22 14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32 12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69 12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02 10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75 13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58 00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58 01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70 SN 2026obc 2026-06-7.43 15.15 21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90 ASASSN-26dr 2026-06-7.24 16.24 06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00 ASASSN-26ds 2026-06-2.97 15.02 20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12 11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63 11:44:33.11 -68:48:32.90 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24.03 8.35 19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28 14:23:56.59 -58:37:47.40 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.59 11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46 21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86 00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34 15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44 11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55 13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96 02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37 17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7 01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8 16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8 09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63 21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9 14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21 14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89 12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5 13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23 09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51 15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.40 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.07 13.88 10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52 22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2 21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51 16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.15 15.93 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Aug 8 04:29 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0 TCP J12242510+2847120 2026-05-31.6015 14.8mag 00:56:07.13 +43:01:40.6 TCP J00560713+4301406 2026-06-01.4135 12.2mag 00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2 PNV J00424164+4115162 2026-06-02.029 17.4mag 00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2 PNV J00423868+4115582 2026-06-05.1224 19.97Umag 19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7 PNV J19004295-4831017 2026-05-25.0752 14.2mag 09:55:21.28 +69:02:52.6 PNV J09552128+6902526 2026-06-13.933 18.9mag 19:51:21.42 +37:06:40.0 TCP J19512142+3706400 2026-06-17.2942 16.8mag 19:57:03.87 +37:41:46.4 TCP J19570387+3741464 2026-06-18.2638 17.5mag 00:42:32.04 +41:10:28.3 PNV J00423204+4110283 2026-06-26.059 16.6mag 02:19:17.36 +28:57:15.8 TCP J02191736+2857158 2026-07-12.3549 12.5mag 00:44:56.43 +41:57:41.6 PNV J00445643+4157416 2026-07-13.8026 17.98Cmag 00:42:55.36 +41:17:27.0 PNV J00425536+4117270 2026-07-20.1813 17.7mag 20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9 TCP J20354364+6131329 2026-07-20.5443 14.4mag 21:17:31.48 +22:25:51.0 TCP J21173148+2225510 2026-07-23.5577 14.8mag 00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8 PNV J00412404+4049028 2026-07-25.0157 18.7mag 00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6 PNV J00430426+4102286 2026-07-26.1512 20mag 14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0 TCP J14515140+6613240 2026-07-29.2561 13.5mag 00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2 PNV J00430615+4122082 2026-07-30.0085 19.4mag 00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2 PNV J00413323+4110122 2026-08-02.8913 17.1mag 05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-06.4109 11.2mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 189K Aug 8 04:29 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 15:37:08.700 +38:44:26.60 AT 2026wbo 2026-07-23.30 18.704 00:04:40.454 +39:05:09.86 AT 2026wbn 2026-07-23.47 19.16 02:25:32.556 +38:48:28.92 AT 2026wbm 2026-07-23.59 19.115 22:51:44.755 -38:02:45.30 AT 2026wbl 2026-07-20.67 19.81 20:44:22.102 -30:33:07.61 AT 2026wbk 2026-07-21.57 19.95 23:01:47.698 +07:45:18.42 AT 2026wbj 2026-07-22.08 20.05 02:18:33.999 +27:15:43.54 AT 2026wbi 2026-07-09.48 19.9027 03:20:07.235 +43:11:07.53 AT 2026wbh 2026-07-23.48 20.1395 01:07:56.328 -09:37:45.38 AT 2026wbg 2026-07-23.44 19.5315 22:29:38.203 +06:36:46.40 AT 2026wbf 2026-07-21.40 20.5415 01:30:44.669 +15:51:26.93 AT 2026wbe 2026-07-19.45 20.7428 22:39:50.171 +06:00:50.94 AT 2026wbd 2026-07-19.37 21.1191 01:07:21.614 +01:57:20.97 AT 2026wbc 2026-07-16.45 20.3594 12:03:36.050 -07:15:24.30 AT 2026wbb 2026-02-24.51 20.97 14:19:16.465 +07:27:42.55 AT 2026wba 2026-02-24.60 21.47 15:29:46.957 -05:24:12.45 AT 2026waz 2026-02-28.63 21.17 09:20:38.822 +01:05:52.48 AT 2026way 2026-01-13.46 20.53 11:59:22.501 +33:57:28.65 AT 2026wax 2026-02-12.61 21.19 12:12:58.534 +22:21:29.32 AT 2026waw 2026-01-13.53 21.43 12:50:44.856 -00:38:38.81 AT 2026wav 2026-01-17.62 20.39 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 87K Aug 8 04:29 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 70 C