This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012931_TTUQ1b1x1_490599_A4Bgu3Ls
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 08.2685 2461260.7685 13.04 04:04:37.87 +54:13:33.2
148.81847 1.36580 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 2.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J061.1544+54.2306 | 04:04:37.87 +54:13:33.2 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input) J-Ks=1.601+/-0.023 (Very red! L if it's a dwarf)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:04:37.87 +54:13:33.2: 14.02 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:04:37.87 +54:13:33.2: 14.17 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.09 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J061.1544+54.2306,2461260.7685,13.04,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J061.1544+54.2306 20260808.2685 13.04CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 08.2685 2461260.7685 12.94 04:42:54.40 +57:48:11.8
150.01563 7.67996 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.0" and 1.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASASSN-V J044254.56+574812.7
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
15.340 g Y 0.510 g 2459176.06900 55.960000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:42:54.40 +57:48:11.8: 14.02 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:42:54.40 +57:48:11.8: 14.21 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.10 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J044254.56+574812.7,2461260.7685,12.94,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J044254.56+574812.7 20260808.2685 12.94CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 08.2685 2461260.7685 13.13 04:13:27.98 +56:27:38.6
148.23095 3.86103 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 2.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 04:13:27.98 +56:27:38.6 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) SpType: K4 (LAMOST DR5) J-Ks=0.782+/-0.028 (K)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:13:27.98 +56:27:38.6: 14.14 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:13:27.98 +56:27:38.6: 14.17 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.15 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461260.7685,13.13,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260808.2685 13.13CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 08.2685 2461260.7685 12.73 04:41:30.48 +54:30:29.4
152.39907 5.38016 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.8" and 2.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASASSN-V J044130.45+543031.3
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.080 V 14.630 V 2458420.31250 247.798301600000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:41:30.48 +54:30:29.4: 13.73 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:41:30.48 +54:30:29.4: 13.61 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.66 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J044130.45+543031.3,2461260.7685,12.73,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J044130.45+543031.3 20260808.2685 12.73CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 08.2685 2461260.7685 12.85 04:17:48.74 +54:55:13.0
149.74323 3.17582 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 2.3 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" ASASSN-V J041748.72+545512.7
Type: SRS
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.160 V 14.250 V 2457413.85100 24.022000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:17:48.74 +54:55:13.0: 13.83 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:17:48.74 +54:55:13.0: 13.81 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.82 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J041748.72+545512.7,2461260.7685,12.85,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J041748.72+545512.7 20260808.2685 12.85CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 08.2685 2461260.7685 13.21 03:59:38.07 +52:47:26.6
149.20350 -0.20364 galactic Per Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 2.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" V0938 Per
Type: DCEP
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.250 V 14.950 V 2451540.20000 3.705900000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 03:59:38.07 +52:47:26.6: 14.45 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 03:59:38.07 +52:47:26.6: 14.26 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.34 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 08.2685* 03 59 38.07 +52 47 26.6 13.2 U Per 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V0938 Per,2461260.7685,13.21,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V0938 Per 20260808.2685 13.21CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 08.2685 2461260.7685 13.31 04:02:56.64 +49:18:57.1
151.87638 -2.48515 galactic Per Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.3" and 2.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" NSVS J0402568+491855
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
17.954 g Y 2.633 g 2458562.49800 330.000000000000 C
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:02:56.64 +49:18:57.1: 15.16 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:02:56.64 +49:18:57.1: 14.71 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.09
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 08.2685* 04 02 56.64 +49 18 57.1 13.3 U Per 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0402568+491855,2461260.7685,13.31,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0402568+491855 20260808.2685 13.31CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 08.2685 2461260.7685 12.98 04:17:51.24 +57:03:02.1
148.25445 4.70303 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 2.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J064.4703+57.0488 | 04:17:51.24 +57:03:02.1 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input) J-Ks=1.113+/-0.032 (M)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:17:51.24 +57:03:02.1: 14.09 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:17:51.24 +57:03:02.1: 13.95 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J064.4703+57.0488,2461260.7685,12.98,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J064.4703+57.0488 20260808.2685 12.98CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 08.2685 2461260.7685 13.12 03:59:16.53 +53:30:49.7
148.69196 0.31023 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.0" and 2.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ZTF J035916.57+533050.1
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.212 r Y 0.148 r 2458377.67820 96.397260200000 C
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 03:59:16.53 +53:30:49.7: 14.03 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 03:59:16.53 +53:30:49.7: 14.20 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.11 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ZTF J035916.57+533050.1,2461260.7685,13.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ZTF J035916.57+533050.1 20260808.2685 13.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 08.2685 2461260.7685 13.02 04:03:51.63 +55:07:12.2
148.14134 1.96064 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 2.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J060.9655+55.1201 | 04:03:51.74 +55:07:12.4 (Gaia DR3) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE J-Ks=1.508+/-0.042 (Very red! L if it's a dwarf)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:03:51.63 +55:07:12.2: 13.94 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:03:51.63 +55:07:12.2: 13.92 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J060.9655+55.1201,2461260.7685,13.02,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J060.9655+55.1201 20260808.2685 13.02CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 08.2685 2461260.7685 12.99 04:17:49.58 +54:10:58.9
150.26020 2.64953 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 2.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 04:17:49.58 +54:10:58.9 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) SpType: G5 (LAMOST DR5) J-Ks=1.546+/-0.033 (Very red! L if it's a dwarf)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:17:49.58 +54:10:58.9: 13.94 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:17:49.58 +54:10:58.9: 13.89 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.92 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461260.7685,12.99,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260808.2685 12.99CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.61077987 22.02.2026 02:39:21.381 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
First image: 2461093.61077987 22.02.2026 02:39:21.381 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
Last image: 2461260.76879193 08.08.2026 06:26:53.623 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012931_TTUQ1b1x1_490599_A4Bgu3Ls/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.69
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 8 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 16163
Objects passed selection criteria: 16076
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 10719.8
Average stars matched: 10431.8 (97.3134 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 241636 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Aug 6 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-190-gdf2934b0
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Aug 8 01:32:39 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.61077987 22.02.2026 02:39:21.381 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
First image: 2461093.61077987 22.02.2026 02:39:21.381 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
Last image: 2461260.76879193 08.08.2026 06:26:53.623 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012931_TTUQ1b1x1_490599_A4Bgu3Ls/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 144
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.35
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 49 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 126813
Objects passed selection criteria: 126421
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 89052
Average stars matched: 85719.2 (96.2575 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 548388 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Aug 6 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-190-gdf2934b0
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Aug 8 01:34:29 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012931_TTUQ1b1x1_490599_A4Bgu3Ls/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012931_TTUQ1b1x1_490599_A4Bgu3Ls/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012931_TTUQ1b1x1_490599_A4Bgu3Ls/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012931_TTUQ1b1x1_490599_A4Bgu3Ls/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461260.76830633
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits'
wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits'
wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits'
wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:14:08.869 +53:59:58.47 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
Image size: 944.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:14:03.503 +53:59:15.22 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:14:08.869 +53:59:58.47
Second-epoch image center 04:14:03.503 +53:59:15.22
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0178 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
Image size: 944.4'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:14:04.501 +53:59:25.21 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:14:08.869 +53:59:58.47
Second-epoch image center 04:14:04.501 +53:59:25.21
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0141 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:14:03.503 +53:59:15.22
Second-epoch second image center 04:14:04.501 +53:59:25.21
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00370 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits &> /tmp/tmp.IpPkEOHkyp
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dHV8BE1SB1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012931_TTUQ1b1x1_490599_A4Bgu3Ls/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LO3JhJgBB1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012931_TTUQ1b1x1_490599_A4Bgu3Ls/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012931_TTUQ1b1x1_490599_A4Bgu3Ls/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Q3tN5k37nU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012931_TTUQ1b1x1_490599_A4Bgu3Ls/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits and wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits and wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits and wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 17373 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 49.0355 to 78.9609 deg, Dec +47.7116 to +59.3642 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 49.0355 to 78.9609 deg, Dec 47.7116 to 59.3642 deg
Loaded 11453 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7219 out of 8021 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8021 out of 17373 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.947200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.947200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.69
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.26
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.26
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 17373 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 49.0355 to 78.9609 deg, Dec +47.7116 to +59.3642 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 49.0355 to 78.9609 deg, Dec 47.7116 to 59.3642 deg
Loaded 11453 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7219 out of 8021 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8021 out of 17373 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 17364 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 49.0352 to 78.9610 deg, Dec +47.7027 to +59.3642 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 49.0352 to 78.9610 deg, Dec 47.7027 to 59.3642 deg
Loaded 11464 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7230 out of 8036 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8036 out of 17364 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
2.1 pix Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
2.3 pix fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
2.2 pix fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
15.3 mag. Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
13.2 mag. fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
13.2 mag. fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.2 (SNR ) 10.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.IpPkEOHkyp (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-08_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012931_TTUQ1b1x1_490599_A4Bgu3Ls/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1702, bad_region=1, passed=17373
Got 17373 stars (including 15651 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 17373 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4920 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4895 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17373 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4920 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17373 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17373 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 4893 stars left (next iteration limit 5384)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits N_match=4893 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.438 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.564 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.430 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.419 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.363 n_q1=1096 n_q2=1175 n_q3=1219 n_q4=1403 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.288
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits -region wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.dHV8BE1SB1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-08_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012931_TTUQ1b1x1_490599_A4Bgu3Ls/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1704, bad_region=0, passed=17364
Got 17364 stars (including 15626 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 17364 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4902 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17364 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17364 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17364 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 4900 stars left (next iteration limit 5392)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits N_match=4900 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.425 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.549 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.432 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.348 n_q1=1102 n_q2=1164 n_q3=1225 n_q4=1409 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.292
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits -region wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.LO3JhJgBB1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-08_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012931_TTUQ1b1x1_490599_A4Bgu3Ls/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012931_TTUQ1b1x1_490599_A4Bgu3Ls/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012931_TTUQ1b1x1_490599_A4Bgu3Ls/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012931_TTUQ1b1x1_490599_A4Bgu3Ls/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012931_TTUQ1b1x1_490599_A4Bgu3Ls/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012931_TTUQ1b1x1_490599_A4Bgu3Ls/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012931_TTUQ1b1x1_490599_A4Bgu3Ls/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012931_TTUQ1b1x1_490599_A4Bgu3Ls/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=201, bad_region=0, passed=4258
Got 4258 stars (including 4053 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4258 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013118 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010494 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3942 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4255 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4255 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4255 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 3940 stars left (next iteration limit 4337)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3940 robust_rms=7.933 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=15.334 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3940 robust_rms=0.643 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.759 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3940 robust_rms=0.540 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.628 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3940 robust_rms_before=1.198 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.504 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.540 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.594 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.628
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.594 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits N_match=3940 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.517 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.524 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.641 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.429 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.518 n_q1=1554 n_q2=679 n_q3=810 n_q4=897 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.240
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012931_TTUQ1b1x1_490599_A4Bgu3Ls/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Q3tN5k37nU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-08_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012931_TTUQ1b1x1_490599_A4Bgu3Ls/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012931_TTUQ1b1x1_490599_A4Bgu3Ls/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012931_TTUQ1b1x1_490599_A4Bgu3Ls/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012931_TTUQ1b1x1_490599_A4Bgu3Ls/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012931_TTUQ1b1x1_490599_A4Bgu3Ls/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012931_TTUQ1b1x1_490599_A4Bgu3Ls/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012931_TTUQ1b1x1_490599_A4Bgu3Ls/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012931_TTUQ1b1x1_490599_A4Bgu3Ls/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=212, bad_region=0, passed=4183
Got 4183 stars (including 3966 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4183 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013117 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010493 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3891 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3859 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3858 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3859 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4180 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3893 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4179 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4179 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 3855 stars left (next iteration limit 4244)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3855 robust_rms=7.580 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=14.606 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3855 robust_rms=0.658 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.793 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3855 robust_rms=0.520 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.621 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3855 robust_rms_before=1.181 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.488 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.520 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.581 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.621
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.581 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits N_match=3855 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.502 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.504 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.588 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.421 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.486 n_q1=1528 n_q2=686 n_q3=763 n_q4=878 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.172
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012931_TTUQ1b1x1_490599_A4Bgu3Ls/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits sigma_overall=0.438 worst_q_ratio=1.288
ref2=Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits sigma_overall=0.425 worst_q_ratio=1.292
new1=fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits sigma_overall=0.517 worst_q_ratio=1.240
new2=fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits sigma_overall=0.502 worst_q_ratio=1.172
reference average sigma_overall=0.4315 worst_q_ratio=1.29
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046_astrometric_residuals.png (4893 matched stars from wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.39 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047_astrometric_residuals.png (4900 matched stars from wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174_astrometric_residuals.png (3940 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.47 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175_astrometric_residuals.png (3855 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.45 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012931_TTUQ1b1x1_490599_A4Bgu3Ls/wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012931_TTUQ1b1x1_490599_A4Bgu3Ls/wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-11-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-11-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012931_TTUQ1b1x1_490599_A4Bgu3Ls/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012931_TTUQ1b1x1_490599_A4Bgu3Ls/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012931_TTUQ1b1x1_490599_A4Bgu3Ls/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012931_TTUQ1b1x1_490599_A4Bgu3Ls/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:14:08.869 +53:59:58.47 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
Image size: 944.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:14:03.503 +53:59:15.22 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:14:08.869 +53:59:58.47
Second-epoch image center 04:14:03.503 +53:59:15.22
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0178 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
Image size: 944.4'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:14:04.501 +53:59:25.21 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:14:08.869 +53:59:58.47
Second-epoch image center 04:14:04.501 +53:59:25.21
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0141 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:14:03.503 +53:59:15.22
Second-epoch second image center 04:14:04.501 +53:59:25.21
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00370 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits &> /tmp/tmp.p4d8vmshUI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8x3TmDM6Yh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012931_TTUQ1b1x1_490599_A4Bgu3Ls/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0X1RA8wC87
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012931_TTUQ1b1x1_490599_A4Bgu3Ls/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012931_TTUQ1b1x1_490599_A4Bgu3Ls/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits &> /tmp/tmp.E1XRTVYFlD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012931_TTUQ1b1x1_490599_A4Bgu3Ls/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits and wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits and wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits and wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 140708 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 48.9404 to 78.9609 deg, Dec +47.6949 to +59.3756 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 48.9404 to 78.9609 deg, Dec 47.6949 to 59.3756 deg
Loaded 11511 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5993 out of 8204 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8204 out of 140708 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.799000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.799000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.35
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 140708 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 48.9404 to 78.9609 deg, Dec +47.6949 to +59.3756 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 48.9404 to 78.9609 deg, Dec 47.6949 to 59.3756 deg
Loaded 11511 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5993 out of 8204 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8204 out of 140708 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 140191 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 48.9776 to 78.9637 deg, Dec +47.6949 to +59.3671 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 48.9776 to 78.9637 deg, Dec 47.6949 to 59.3671 deg
Loaded 11495 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6007 out of 8204 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8204 out of 140191 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 135 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
1.9 pix Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
2.2 pix fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
2.2 pix fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
15.4 mag. Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
13.6 mag. fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
13.6 mag. fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.6 (SNR ) 13.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.p4d8vmshUI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-08_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012931_TTUQ1b1x1_490599_A4Bgu3Ls/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=49, blended=14794, bad_region=2, passed=140659
Got 140659 stars (including 125608 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 140659 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4920 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4905 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 140659 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4920 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 140659 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 140659 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 4905 stars left (next iteration limit 5395)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits N_match=4905 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.423 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.549 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.427 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.358 n_q1=1073 n_q2=1173 n_q3=1214 n_q4=1445 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.297
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits -region wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.8x3TmDM6Yh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-08_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012931_TTUQ1b1x1_490599_A4Bgu3Ls/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=47, blended=14593, bad_region=1, passed=140144
Got 140144 stars (including 125314 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 140144 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4919 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4902 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 140144 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4919 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 140144 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 140144 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 4904 stars left (next iteration limit 5392)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits N_match=4904 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.529 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.347 n_q1=1087 n_q2=1183 n_q3=1200 n_q4=1434 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.290
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits -region wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.0X1RA8wC87 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-08_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012931_TTUQ1b1x1_490599_A4Bgu3Ls/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012931_TTUQ1b1x1_490599_A4Bgu3Ls/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012931_TTUQ1b1x1_490599_A4Bgu3Ls/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012931_TTUQ1b1x1_490599_A4Bgu3Ls/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012931_TTUQ1b1x1_490599_A4Bgu3Ls/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012931_TTUQ1b1x1_490599_A4Bgu3Ls/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012931_TTUQ1b1x1_490599_A4Bgu3Ls/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012931_TTUQ1b1x1_490599_A4Bgu3Ls/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=1, blended=1376, bad_region=4, passed=38990
Got 38990 stars (including 37550 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 38990 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013118 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010494 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.0 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4914 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4883 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38963 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.0 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4914 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38963 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38963 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4882 stars left (next iteration limit 5370)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits N_match=4882 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.509 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.518 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.608 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.516 n_q1=1924 n_q2=821 n_q3=1030 n_q4=1107 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.194
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012931_TTUQ1b1x1_490599_A4Bgu3Ls/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.E1XRTVYFlD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-08_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012931_TTUQ1b1x1_490599_A4Bgu3Ls/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012931_TTUQ1b1x1_490599_A4Bgu3Ls/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012931_TTUQ1b1x1_490599_A4Bgu3Ls/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012931_TTUQ1b1x1_490599_A4Bgu3Ls/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012931_TTUQ1b1x1_490599_A4Bgu3Ls/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012931_TTUQ1b1x1_490599_A4Bgu3Ls/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012931_TTUQ1b1x1_490599_A4Bgu3Ls/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012931_TTUQ1b1x1_490599_A4Bgu3Ls/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=1299, bad_region=6, passed=38834
Got 38834 stars (including 37482 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 38834 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013117 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010493 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.1 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4873 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38809 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.0 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4909 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38809 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38809 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 4875 stars left (next iteration limit 5363)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits N_match=4875 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.492 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.485 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.586 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.418 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.489 n_q1=1937 n_q2=849 n_q3=963 n_q4=1126 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.191
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012931_TTUQ1b1x1_490599_A4Bgu3Ls/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012931_TTUQ1b1x1_490599_A4Bgu3Ls/wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0174.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-08_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012931_TTUQ1b1x1_490599_A4Bgu3Ls/wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-11-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 03:52:53.70 +53:55:53.0: 12.74 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 03:52:06.17 +53:37:41.5: 14.01 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 03:40:10.64 +50:46:15.1: 12.94 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 03:39:52.58 +50:08:39.6: 12.96 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 03:49:14.59 +56:23:01.3: 12.57 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 03:39:52.58 +50:08:39.6: 12.96 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 03:52:53.70 +53:55:53.0: 12.75 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 03:52:06.17 +53:37:41.5: 14.07 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 03:40:10.64 +50:46:15.1: 12.91 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.96 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.75 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 03:49:14.59 +56:23:01.3: 12.62 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:39:52.58 +50:08:39.6: ref_mag=12.96 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6210 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:52:53.70 +53:55:53.0: ref_mag=12.75 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3803 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.92 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:52:06.17 +53:37:41.5: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4450 delta=0.60 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:40:10.64 +50:46:15.1: ref_mag=12.92 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6390 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.60 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:49:14.59 +56:23:01.3: ref_mag=12.60 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8984 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 03:49:18.39 +52:39:29.2: 12.76 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:26:53.25 +51:58:59.0: 12.70 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:21:30.62 +53:41:36.1: 12.87 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 03:49:18.39 +52:39:29.2: 12.82 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.79 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:49:18.39 +52:39:29.2: ref_mag=12.79 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5033 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:42:40.50 +58:26:17.1: 12.64 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 03:46:37.76 +52:36:46.5: 13.28 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:26:53.25 +51:58:59.0: 12.69 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.70 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:26:53.25 +51:58:59.0: ref_mag=12.70 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3827 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 03:54:13.14 +51:33:48.4: 13.20 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:21:30.62 +53:41:36.1: 12.92 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.90 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:21:30.62 +53:41:36.1: ref_mag=12.90 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4347 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:42:40.50 +58:26:17.1: 12.61 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.63 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:42:40.50 +58:26:17.1: ref_mag=12.63 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4848 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 03:46:37.76 +52:36:46.5: 13.24 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.26 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:46:37.76 +52:36:46.5: ref_mag=13.26 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8618 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:27:59.58 +54:35:51.4: 12.99 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:02:15.95 +52:53:31.6: 13.46 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:22:11.56 +51:01:13.9: 13.15 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 03:54:13.14 +51:33:48.4: 13.29 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.24 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:54:13.14 +51:33:48.4: ref_mag=13.24 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8666 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:02:15.95 +52:53:31.6: 13.45 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:27:59.58 +54:35:51.4: 13.00 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.45 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.00 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:02:15.95 +52:53:31.6: ref_mag=13.45 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0030 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:27:59.58 +54:35:51.4: ref_mag=13.00 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8250 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:22:11.56 +51:01:13.9: 13.11 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.13 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:22:11.56 +51:01:13.9: ref_mag=13.13 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8325 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:04:37.87 +54:13:33.2: 14.02 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:42:54.40 +57:48:11.8: 14.02 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:13:27.98 +56:27:38.6: 14.14 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:41:30.48 +54:30:29.4: 13.73 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:04:37.87 +54:13:33.2: 14.17 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:42:54.40 +57:48:11.8: 14.21 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.09 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.10 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:04:37.87 +54:13:33.2: ref_mag=14.09 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.0364 delta=1.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:42:54.40 +57:48:11.8: ref_mag=14.10 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.9254 delta=1.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:13:27.98 +56:27:38.6: 14.17 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.15 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:13:27.98 +56:27:38.6: ref_mag=14.15 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.1195 delta=1.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:41:30.48 +54:30:29.4: 13.61 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:17:48.74 +54:55:13.0: 13.83 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.66 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:41:30.48 +54:30:29.4: ref_mag=13.66 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.7294 delta=0.93 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:17:48.74 +54:55:13.0: 13.81 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.82 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:17:48.74 +54:55:13.0: ref_mag=13.82 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8518 delta=0.97 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:22:39.01 +52:54:38.4: 13.01 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:22:39.01 +52:54:38.4: 12.98 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.99 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:22:39.01 +52:54:38.4: ref_mag=12.99 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5956 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 03:59:38.07 +52:47:26.6: 14.45 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 03:59:38.07 +52:47:26.6: 14.26 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.34 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 03:59:38.07 +52:47:26.6: ref_mag=14.34 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.2005 delta=1.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:02:56.64 +49:18:57.1: 15.16 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:02:56.64 +49:18:57.1: 14.71 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:02:56.64 +49:18:57.1: ref_mag=14.85 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.3084 delta=1.54 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:17:51.24 +57:03:02.1: 14.09 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:17:51.24 +57:03:02.1: 13.95 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:17:51.24 +57:03:02.1: ref_mag=14.02 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.9813 delta=1.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 03:59:16.53 +53:30:49.7: 14.03 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 03:59:16.53 +53:30:49.7: 14.20 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.11 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 03:59:16.53 +53:30:49.7: ref_mag=14.11 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.0781 delta=1.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:03:51.63 +55:07:12.2: 13.94 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:17:49.58 +54:10:58.9: 13.94 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:03:51.63 +55:07:12.2: 13.92 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:03:51.63 +55:07:12.2: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0137 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:17:49.58 +54:10:58.9: 13.89 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.92 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:17:49.58 +54:10:58.9: ref_mag=13.92 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9817 delta=0.93 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out100536.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out12865.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out28233.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out37085.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out55383.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out56199.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out56310.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out65006.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out65878.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out75229.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out84417.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 21s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 7s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163531_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 163531_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163533_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 163533_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:04:31.70 +57:49:20.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163544_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 163544_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:56:23.45 +50:41:46.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163556_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 163556_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163557_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 163557_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:11:38.93 +53:09:05.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163561_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 163561_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:03:18.18 +55:02:14.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163562_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 163562_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163564_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 163564_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163565_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 163565_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163567_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 163567_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:18:05.04 +50:18:01.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163579_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 163579_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163584_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 163584_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163587_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 163587_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163600_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 163600_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163615_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 163615_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163616_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 163616_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163636_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 163636_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163657_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 163657_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163663_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 163663_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:28:44.10 +49:51:12.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163674_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 163674_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:14:55.40 +58:31:13.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163675_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 163675_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163686_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 163686_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163708_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 163708_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163721_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 163721_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:40:04.43 +48:56:48.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163723_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 163723_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:25:57.38 +49:08:18.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163724_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 163724_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:57:20.55 +53:27:38.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163727_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 163727_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:22:02.74 +51:01:39.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163732_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 163732_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163734_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 163734_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163736_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 163736_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:22:29.34 +51:37:11.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163738_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 163738_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163743_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 163743_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163748_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 163748_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:47:45.34 +51:10:51.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163750_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 163750_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:31:39.89 +51:19:03.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163753_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 163753_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:47:01.99 +51:42:11.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163757_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 163757_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163760_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 163760_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163762_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 163762_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163764_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 163764_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:04:43.79 +59:09:23.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163771_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 163771_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163775_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 163775_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:48:33.76 +51:41:18.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163778_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 163778_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:59:24.04 +49:25:18.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163781_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 163781_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163784_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 163784_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163785_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 163785_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:47:52.13 +56:44:19.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163789_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 163789_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:15:09.53 +50:40:22.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163810_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 163810_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163812_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 163812_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163814_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 163814_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:15:20.49 +53:40:53.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163820_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 163820_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:01:40.66 +53:50:11.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163824_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 163824_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:19:04.17 +52:35:42.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163833_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 163833_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163834_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 163834_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163847_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 163847_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163854_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 163854_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:23:48.13 +54:34:00.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163855_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 163855_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:51:28.42 +49:46:36.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163857_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 163857_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:04:36.74 +55:54:33.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163862_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 163862_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163870_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 163870_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:00:57.05 +53:03:54.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163876_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 163876_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:15:12.15 +53:43:58.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163887_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 163887_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:52:44.49 +53:28:05.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163891_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 163891_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:43:33.26 +55:19:23.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163892_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 163892_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163895_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 163895_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163908_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 163908_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163909_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 163909_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163915_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 163915_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163920_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 163920_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:45:03.09 +56:19:09.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163925_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 163925_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:08:46.68 +53:20:40.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163926_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 163926_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163934_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 163934_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163937_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 163937_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:24:11.70 +56:29:05.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65878_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
Preparing report for the candidate 65878_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12865_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
Preparing report for the candidate 12865_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 124454_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 124454_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:30:44.89 +51:13:36.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37085_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
Preparing report for the candidate 37085_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130337_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 130337_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:11:45.11 +51:43:37.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114120_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 114120_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:28:28.53 +50:27:20.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63583_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 63583_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:15:46.75 +54:19:53.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07179_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 07179_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:40:58.49 +58:17:08.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56199_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
Preparing report for the candidate 56199_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 43318_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 43318_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:12:59.46 +56:01:11.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140170_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 140170_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:08:11.09 +49:01:28.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121139_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 121139_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:55:51.73 +51:05:36.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52772_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 52772_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:28:00.26 +55:06:11.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56310_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
Preparing report for the candidate 56310_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132530_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 132530_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:02:25.88 +51:57:59.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 48634_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 48634_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:58:35.86 +55:41:57.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78328_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 78328_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:35:47.27 +52:49:59.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79800_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 79800_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:09:21.95 +53:06:24.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126063_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 126063_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:54:21.54 +51:28:37.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 48666_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 48666_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:18:52.45 +55:33:57.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77810_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 77810_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:37:20.94 +52:48:30.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 44816_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 44816_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:43:50.24 +55:22:33.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103927_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 103927_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:21:35.33 +49:37:16.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76132_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 76132_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:35:27.24 +52:56:40.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114547_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 114547_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:04:12.72 +50:34:06.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26662_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 26662_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:59:57.70 +57:16:37.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80234_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 80234_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53753_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 53753_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:27:10.09 +55:00:55.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86416_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 86416_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:45:47.83 +52:38:45.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54190_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 54190_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:39:49.48 +54:43:32.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46274_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 46274_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:56:49.30 +54:53:35.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67230_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 67230_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:12:18.20 +54:02:07.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 42501_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 42501_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:24:46.58 +55:55:42.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113147_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 113147_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:35:33.45 +50:25:31.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57856_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 57856_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116627_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 116627_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:26:18.26 +50:35:50.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54144_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 54144_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:56:32.37 +55:14:51.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116325_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 116325_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:53:15.35 +50:43:13.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49622_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 49622_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:55:32.40 +54:40:40.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83408_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 83408_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113617_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 113617_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:25:28.90 +50:14:24.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84417_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
Preparing report for the candidate 84417_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131821_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 131821_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:20:31.58 +51:45:29.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63742_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 63742_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:10:11.01 +54:21:48.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25829_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 25829_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:00:50.51 +56:10:52.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54762_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 54762_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:46:25.15 +54:28:50.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79941_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 79941_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:17:47.33 +53:00:11.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19552_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 19552_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:36:33.71 +57:24:05.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64305_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 64305_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:18:09.44 +54:14:31.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100536_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
Preparing report for the candidate 100536_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110200_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 110200_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:42:34.72 +50:15:58.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64230_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 64230_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:25:39.33 +54:08:19.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 124113_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 124113_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:22:37.63 +51:05:49.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14434_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 14434_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:59:16.16 +58:13:18.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22810_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 22810_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:25:20.32 +57:20:29.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28233_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
Preparing report for the candidate 28233_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75229_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
Preparing report for the candidate 75229_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85971_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 85971_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:43:27.36 +52:39:35.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116731_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 116731_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:16:33.22 +50:37:34.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55383_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
Preparing report for the candidate 55383_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65006_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
Preparing report for the candidate 65006_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94722_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 94722_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:25:56.01 +49:53:26.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49794_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175
The candidate 49794_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-08_01-26-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0175 did not pass the final checks
