This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_224118_TTUQ1b1x1_1475931_EZWsfarg
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 07.1530 2461259.6530 12.43 01:43:12.37 +53:54:16.8
130.59261 -8.19530 galactic Per Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 5.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" ASASSN-V J014312.39+535416.6
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.280 V 13.590 V 2458390.89680 137.232723600000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 01:43:12.37 +53:54:16.8: 13.48 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:43:12.37 +53:54:16.8: 13.41 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 07.1530* 01 43 12.37 +53 54 16.8 12.4 U Per 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J014312.39+535416.6,2461259.6530,12.43,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J014312.39+535416.6 20260807.1530 12.43CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 07.1530 2461259.6530 12.43 02:15:51.54 +55:37:05.1
134.71561 -5.31029 galactic Per Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.0" and 5.3 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J021551.61+553705.6
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.400 V 13.930 V 2458294.15910 135.080860700000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 02:15:51.54 +55:37:05.1: 13.44 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 02:15:51.54 +55:37:05.1: 13.35 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.39 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 07.1530* 02 15 51.54 +55 37 05.1 12.4 U Per 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J021551.61+553705.6,2461259.6530,12.43,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J021551.61+553705.6 20260807.1530 12.43CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 07.1530 2461259.6530 12.11 02:19:20.72 +55:00:24.7
135.38791 -5.72478 galactic Per Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 5.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" ZTF J021921.00+550024.0
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.597 g Y 0.264 g 2458321.87560 43.896974600000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 02:19:20.72 +55:00:24.7: 13.13 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 02:19:20.72 +55:00:24.7: 13.01 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.06 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 07.1530* 02 19 20.72 +55 00 24.7 12.1 U Per 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ZTF J021921.00+550024.0,2461259.6530,12.11,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ZTF J021921.00+550024.0 20260807.1530 12.11CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 07.1530 2461259.6530 11.74 01:19:52.46 +57:38:04.7
126.74525 -5.02641 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 5.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" NSVS J0119524+573803
Type: L:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
10.602 R1 Y 0.500 R1 310.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 01:19:52.46 +57:38:04.7: 12.70 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:19:52.46 +57:38:04.7: 12.71 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.70 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 07.1530* 01 19 52.46 +57 38 04.7 11.7 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0119524+573803,2461259.6530,11.74,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0119524+573803 20260807.1530 11.74CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 07.1530 2461259.6530 11.39 01:09:49.40 +56:08:35.0
125.50802 -6.63670 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 6.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J010949.45+560834.3
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.690 g Y 0.700 g 2459223.73400 245.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 01:09:49.40 +56:08:35.0: 12.38 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:09:49.40 +56:08:35.0: 12.41 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.39 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 07.1530* 01 09 49.40 +56 08 35.0 11.4 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J010949.45+560834.3,2461259.6530,11.39,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J010949.45+560834.3 20260807.1530 11.39CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 07.1530 2461259.6530 13.13 01:12:01.27 +55:04:52.0
125.90140 -7.67192 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 6.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" ASASSN-V J011201.24+550451.7
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
15.710 g Y 0.900 g 2459362.10600 57.270000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 01:12:01.27 +55:04:52.0: 14.02 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:12:01.27 +55:04:52.0: 14.06 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 07.1530* 01 12 01.27 +55 04 52.0 13.1 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J011201.24+550451.7,2461259.6530,13.13,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J011201.24+550451.7 20260807.1530 13.13CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 07.1530 2461259.6530 13.03 00:46:54.73 +53:57:40.1
122.25816 -8.90469 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 6.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J004654.75+535739.3
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.160 V 15.030 V 2458307.13990 213.793578600000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 00:46:54.73 +53:57:40.1: 13.98 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:46:54.73 +53:57:40.1: 13.96 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 07.1530* 00 46 54.73 +53 57 40.1 13.0 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J004654.75+535739.3,2461259.6530,13.03,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J004654.75+535739.3 20260807.1530 13.03CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 07.1530 2461259.6530 11.03 02:07:15.65 +54:13:31.2
133.96243 -7.01453 galactic Per Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 5.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" V0662 Per
Type: SR:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.900 V 13.200 V 154.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 02:07:15.65 +54:13:31.2: 12.03 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 02:07:15.65 +54:13:31.2: 12.04 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.04 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 07.1530* 02 07 15.65 +54 13 31.2 11.0 U Per 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V0662 Per,2461259.6530,11.03,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V0662 Per 20260807.1530 11.03CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461082.60540762 11.02.2026 02:31:37.218 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
First image: 2461082.60540762 11.02.2026 02:31:37.218 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
Last image: 2461259.65339390 07.08.2026 03:40:43.233 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_224118_TTUQ1b1x1_1475931_EZWsfarg/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 21
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.74
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 9 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 28327
Objects passed selection criteria: 28196
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 20382.5
Average stars matched: 19896.8 (97.6168 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 253564 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Aug 6 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-190-gdf2934b0
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Aug 6 22:43:40 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461082.60540762 11.02.2026 02:31:37.218 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
First image: 2461082.60540762 11.02.2026 02:31:37.218 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
Last image: 2461259.65339390 07.08.2026 03:40:43.233 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_224118_TTUQ1b1x1_1475931_EZWsfarg/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 211
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.42
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 110 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 199098
Objects passed selection criteria: 198518
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 146759
Average stars matched: 141562 (96.4586 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 658884 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Aug 6 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-190-gdf2934b0
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Aug 6 22:46:39 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_224118_TTUQ1b1x1_1475931_EZWsfarg/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-39-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_224118_TTUQ1b1x1_1475931_EZWsfarg/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_224118_TTUQ1b1x1_1475931_EZWsfarg/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-39-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_224118_TTUQ1b1x1_1475931_EZWsfarg/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461259.65259128
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits'
wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits'
wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-39-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-39-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-39-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-39-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits'
wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:24:35.483 +53:59:24.91 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-39-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-39-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
Image size: 944.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:25:01.829 +53:59:59.97 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 01:24:35.483 +53:59:24.91
Second-epoch image center 01:25:01.829 +53:59:59.97
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0653 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
Image size: 944.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:25:00.091 +54:00:32.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 01:24:35.483 +53:59:24.91
Second-epoch image center 01:25:00.091 +54:00:32.20
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0631 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 01:25:01.829 +53:59:59.97
Second-epoch second image center 01:25:00.091 +54:00:32.20
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00991 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nWPJaJSbU1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fugSGU8Cek
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_224118_TTUQ1b1x1_1475931_EZWsfarg/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-39-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits &> /tmp/tmp.H0jrK1HLQX
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_224118_TTUQ1b1x1_1475931_EZWsfarg/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-39-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_224118_TTUQ1b1x1_1475931_EZWsfarg/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits &> /tmp/tmp.VZMZi006NT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_224118_TTUQ1b1x1_1475931_EZWsfarg/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits and wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits and wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits and wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 30398 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 6.6208 to 36.4936 deg, Dec +47.7183 to +59.3714 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 6.6208 to 36.4936 deg, Dec 47.7183 to 59.3714 deg
Loaded 24495 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 15177 out of 17024 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 17024 out of 30398 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.893200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.893200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.74
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.15
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.15
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 30398 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 6.6208 to 36.4936 deg, Dec +47.7183 to +59.3714 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 6.6208 to 36.4936 deg, Dec 47.7183 to 59.3714 deg
Loaded 24495 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 15177 out of 17024 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 17024 out of 30398 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 30267 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 6.6206 to 36.4936 deg, Dec +47.7183 to +59.3740 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 6.6206 to 36.4936 deg, Dec 47.7183 to 59.3740 deg
Loaded 24499 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 15196 out of 17027 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 17027 out of 30267 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 20 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
2.1 pix Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits
2.8 pix fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-39-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
2.8 pix fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
15.2 mag. Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits
13.7 mag. fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-39-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
13.7 mag. fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.7 (SNR ) 11.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.nWPJaJSbU1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-06_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_224118_TTUQ1b1x1_1475931_EZWsfarg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits' -> 'wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3534, bad_region=0, passed=30398
Got 30398 stars (including 26827 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30398 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4906 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30398 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30398 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30398 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 4908 stars left (next iteration limit 5396)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits N_match=4908 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.476 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.328 n_q1=1364 n_q2=1359 n_q3=1052 n_q4=1133 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.205
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits -region wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.fugSGU8Cek (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-06_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_224118_TTUQ1b1x1_1475931_EZWsfarg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits' -> 'wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3522, bad_region=0, passed=30267
Got 30267 stars (including 26698 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30267 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4901 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30267 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30267 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30267 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 4900 stars left (next iteration limit 5390)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits N_match=4900 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.500 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.328 n_q1=1340 n_q2=1363 n_q3=1055 n_q4=1142 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.233
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits -region wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.H0jrK1HLQX (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-06_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_224118_TTUQ1b1x1_1475931_EZWsfarg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_224118_TTUQ1b1x1_1475931_EZWsfarg/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-39-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_224118_TTUQ1b1x1_1475931_EZWsfarg/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-39-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_224118_TTUQ1b1x1_1475931_EZWsfarg/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-39-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_224118_TTUQ1b1x1_1475931_EZWsfarg/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-39-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_224118_TTUQ1b1x1_1475931_EZWsfarg/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-39-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_224118_TTUQ1b1x1_1475931_EZWsfarg/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-39-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-39-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-39-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-39-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-39-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-39-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-39-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-39-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_224118_TTUQ1b1x1_1475931_EZWsfarg/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-39-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-39-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=549, bad_region=0, passed=10663
Got 10663 stars (including 10104 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-39-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10663 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013119 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010496 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 47.9 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4872 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4874 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4872 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10663 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 47.9 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10663 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10663 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 4874 stars left (next iteration limit 5359)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4874 robust_rms=8.016 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=16.029 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4874 robust_rms=0.541 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.871 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4874 robust_rms=0.401 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.557 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4874 robust_rms_before=1.453 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.394 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.401 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.497 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.557
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.497 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-39-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits N_match=4874 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.457 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.492 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.371 n_q1=1218 n_q2=654 n_q3=1736 n_q4=1266 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.264
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-39-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-39-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_224118_TTUQ1b1x1_1475931_EZWsfarg/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-39-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits -region wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-39-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-39-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.VZMZi006NT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-06_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_224118_TTUQ1b1x1_1475931_EZWsfarg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_224118_TTUQ1b1x1_1475931_EZWsfarg/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_224118_TTUQ1b1x1_1475931_EZWsfarg/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_224118_TTUQ1b1x1_1475931_EZWsfarg/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_224118_TTUQ1b1x1_1475931_EZWsfarg/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_224118_TTUQ1b1x1_1475931_EZWsfarg/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_224118_TTUQ1b1x1_1475931_EZWsfarg/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_224118_TTUQ1b1x1_1475931_EZWsfarg/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=534, bad_region=0, passed=10696
Got 10696 stars (including 10150 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10696 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013118 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010494 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4872 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10695 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4872 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10695 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4872 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10695 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 4872 stars left (next iteration limit 5358)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4872 robust_rms=7.902 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=15.770 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4872 robust_rms=0.461 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.731 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4872 robust_rms=0.392 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.623 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4872 robust_rms_before=1.362 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.405 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.392 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.475 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.623
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.475 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits N_match=4872 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.474 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.496 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.367 n_q1=1224 n_q2=667 n_q3=1720 n_q4=1261 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.259
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_224118_TTUQ1b1x1_1475931_EZWsfarg/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits -region wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits sigma_overall=0.395 worst_q_ratio=1.205
ref2=Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits sigma_overall=0.405 worst_q_ratio=1.233
new1=fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-39-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits sigma_overall=0.389 worst_q_ratio=1.264
new2=fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits sigma_overall=0.394 worst_q_ratio=1.259
reference average sigma_overall=0.4 worst_q_ratio=1.219
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016_astrometric_residuals.png (4908 matched stars from wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017_astrometric_residuals.png (4900 matched stars from wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-39-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0066_astrometric_residuals.png (4874 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-39-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.36 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067_astrometric_residuals.png (4872 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-39-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-39-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_224118_TTUQ1b1x1_1475931_EZWsfarg/wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-39-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_224118_TTUQ1b1x1_1475931_EZWsfarg/wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cas-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51839_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 51839_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:36:01.49 +57:54:42.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51859_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 51859_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:18:55.27 +57:09:18.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51864_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 51864_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:19:46.58 +58:12:25.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51891_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 51891_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:14:47.67 +51:48:19.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51896_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 51896_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:18:49.58 +57:07:20.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51901_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 51901_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:22:51.51 +57:50:33.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51905_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 51905_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:30:05.70 +50:10:01.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51909_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 51909_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:04:54.87 +53:15:49.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21610_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 21610_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:12:45.36 +52:27:24.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15289_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 15289_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:00:44.22 +54:01:07.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50216_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 50216_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:12:26.03 +54:50:07.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07175_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 07175_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:38:06.74 +57:12:04.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24520_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 24520_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:41:33.04 +50:54:33.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22587_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 22587_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:19:43.99 +52:02:30.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 00816_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 00816_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:01:28.09 +58:18:13.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29627_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 29627_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:10:12.93 +49:10:21.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17548_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 17548_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:59:59.91 +53:13:25.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18634_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 18634_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:48:10.26 +53:34:02.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16385_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 16385_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:54:35.00 +54:26:36.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24734_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 24734_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:43:39.17 +50:41:19.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 3s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cas-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_224118_TTUQ1b1x1_1475931_EZWsfarg/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-39-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_224118_TTUQ1b1x1_1475931_EZWsfarg/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_224118_TTUQ1b1x1_1475931_EZWsfarg/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-39-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_224118_TTUQ1b1x1_1475931_EZWsfarg/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-39-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-39-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:24:35.483 +53:59:24.91 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-39-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-39-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
Image size: 944.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:25:01.829 +53:59:59.97 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 01:24:35.483 +53:59:24.91
Second-epoch image center 01:25:01.829 +53:59:59.97
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0653 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
Image size: 944.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:25:00.091 +54:00:32.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 01:24:35.483 +53:59:24.91
Second-epoch image center 01:25:00.091 +54:00:32.20
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0631 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 01:25:01.829 +53:59:59.97
Second-epoch second image center 01:25:00.091 +54:00:32.20
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00991 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits &> /tmp/tmp.o2PQv6uBOm
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits &> /tmp/tmp.a9oKgz1edD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_224118_TTUQ1b1x1_1475931_EZWsfarg/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-39-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits &> /tmp/tmp.c74RUfsC1H
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_224118_TTUQ1b1x1_1475931_EZWsfarg/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-39-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_224118_TTUQ1b1x1_1475931_EZWsfarg/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits &> /tmp/tmp.POwHgEBiMj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_224118_TTUQ1b1x1_1475931_EZWsfarg/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits and wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits and wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits and wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 218143 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 6.6024 to 36.6326 deg, Dec +47.6667 to +59.3746 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 6.6024 to 36.6326 deg, Dec 47.6667 to 59.3746 deg
Loaded 24690 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11569 out of 17799 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 17799 out of 218143 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.751400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.751400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.42
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.33
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.33
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 218143 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 6.6024 to 36.6326 deg, Dec +47.6667 to +59.3746 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 6.6024 to 36.6326 deg, Dec 47.6667 to 59.3746 deg
Loaded 24690 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11569 out of 17799 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 17799 out of 218143 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 218882 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 6.6206 to 36.6596 deg, Dec +47.6573 to +59.3745 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 6.6206 to 36.6596 deg, Dec 47.6573 to 59.3745 deg
Loaded 24713 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11618 out of 17813 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 17813 out of 218882 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 203 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
2.0 pix Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits
2.7 pix fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-39-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
2.7 pix fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
15.3 mag. Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-39-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.9 (SNR ) 13.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.o2PQv6uBOm (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-06_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_224118_TTUQ1b1x1_1475931_EZWsfarg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits' -> 'wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=64, blended=34145, bad_region=1, passed=218079
Got 218079 stars (including 183608 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 218079 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4918 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 218079 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 218079 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 218079 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 4919 stars left (next iteration limit 5409)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits N_match=4919 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.453 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.311 n_q1=1231 n_q2=1371 n_q3=1089 n_q4=1228 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.205
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits -region wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.a9oKgz1edD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-06_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_224118_TTUQ1b1x1_1475931_EZWsfarg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits' -> 'wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=73, blended=33997, bad_region=0, passed=218809
Got 218809 stars (including 184491 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 218809 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4951 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4920 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 218809 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4951 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 218809 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 218809 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 4920 stars left (next iteration limit 5412)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits N_match=4920 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.463 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.310 n_q1=1223 n_q2=1372 n_q3=1103 n_q4=1222 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.215
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits -region wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.c74RUfsC1H (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-06_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_224118_TTUQ1b1x1_1475931_EZWsfarg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_224118_TTUQ1b1x1_1475931_EZWsfarg/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-39-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_224118_TTUQ1b1x1_1475931_EZWsfarg/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-39-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_224118_TTUQ1b1x1_1475931_EZWsfarg/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-39-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_224118_TTUQ1b1x1_1475931_EZWsfarg/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-39-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_224118_TTUQ1b1x1_1475931_EZWsfarg/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-39-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_224118_TTUQ1b1x1_1475931_EZWsfarg/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-39-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-39-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-39-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-39-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-39-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-39-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-39-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-39-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_224118_TTUQ1b1x1_1475931_EZWsfarg/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-39-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-39-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=4589, bad_region=3, passed=75984
Got 75984 stars (including 71287 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-39-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 75984 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013119 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010496 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4887 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75982 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75982 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75982 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 4885 stars left (next iteration limit 5372)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-39-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-39-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits N_match=4885 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.457 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.492 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.379 n_q1=1243 n_q2=648 n_q3=1698 n_q4=1296 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.254
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-39-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-39-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_224118_TTUQ1b1x1_1475931_EZWsfarg/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-39-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits -region wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-39-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-39-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.POwHgEBiMj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-06_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_224118_TTUQ1b1x1_1475931_EZWsfarg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_224118_TTUQ1b1x1_1475931_EZWsfarg/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_224118_TTUQ1b1x1_1475931_EZWsfarg/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_224118_TTUQ1b1x1_1475931_EZWsfarg/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_224118_TTUQ1b1x1_1475931_EZWsfarg/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_224118_TTUQ1b1x1_1475931_EZWsfarg/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_224118_TTUQ1b1x1_1475931_EZWsfarg/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_224118_TTUQ1b1x1_1475931_EZWsfarg/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=4881, bad_region=5, passed=77503
Got 77503 stars (including 72498 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 77503 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013118 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010494 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4888 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 77501 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4887 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 77501 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4887 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 77501 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 4887 stars left (next iteration limit 5374)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits N_match=4887 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.397 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.472 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.489 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.388 n_q1=1244 n_q2=673 n_q3=1698 n_q4=1272 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.231
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_224118_TTUQ1b1x1_1475931_EZWsfarg/fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits -region wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-39-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_224118_TTUQ1b1x1_1475931_EZWsfarg/wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-39-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_224118_TTUQ1b1x1_1475931_EZWsfarg/wcs_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cas-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 01:04:17.87 +52:57:24.2: 13.73 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 01:05:13.70 +50:57:03.6: 13.07 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 00:42:15.83 +54:29:01.8: 13.43 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 01:25:54.51 +57:22:28.3: 13.63 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 01:04:41.46 +55:47:03.8: 13.23 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:05:13.70 +50:57:03.6: 13.09 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:42:15.83 +54:29:01.8: 13.37 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.08 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:05:13.70 +50:57:03.6: ref_mag=13.08 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0574 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:25:54.51 +57:22:28.3: 13.63 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.39 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:42:15.83 +54:29:01.8: ref_mag=13.39 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4523 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.63 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:04:41.46 +55:47:03.8: 13.24 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:25:54.51 +57:22:28.3: ref_mag=13.63 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2585 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:04:17.87 +52:57:24.2: 13.65 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.24 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:04:41.46 +55:47:03.8: ref_mag=13.24 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1783 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.69 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:04:17.87 +52:57:24.2: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5080 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 00:58:38.31 +54:05:15.9: 12.91 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 01:49:42.21 +55:55:24.6: 12.83 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:58:38.31 +54:05:15.9: 12.94 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.93 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:58:38.31 +54:05:15.9: ref_mag=12.93 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9956 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:49:42.21 +55:55:24.6: 12.77 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.80 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:49:42.21 +55:55:24.6: ref_mag=12.80 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7755 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 00:43:02.37 +54:33:22.9: 12.92 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 01:06:00.74 +52:26:35.9: 13.62 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 00:45:04.43 +53:26:57.8: 12.57 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:43:02.37 +54:33:22.9: 12.96 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.94 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:43:02.37 +54:33:22.9: ref_mag=12.94 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9981 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 00:54:53.70 +52:16:22.6: 12.68 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 01:33:15.27 +55:50:28.3: 12.61 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 00:42:01.04 +55:21:14.1: 12.88 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:06:00.74 +52:26:35.9: 13.68 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.65 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:06:00.74 +52:26:35.9: ref_mag=13.65 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8382 delta=0.81 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:45:04.43 +53:26:57.8: 12.65 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.61 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:45:04.43 +53:26:57.8: ref_mag=12.61 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9795 delta=-0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:33:15.27 +55:50:28.3: 12.59 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.60 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:33:15.27 +55:50:28.3: ref_mag=12.60 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5430 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:42:01.04 +55:21:14.1: 12.76 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.81 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:42:01.04 +55:21:14.1: ref_mag=12.81 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7346 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:54:53.70 +52:16:22.6: 12.63 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.65 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:54:53.70 +52:16:22.6: ref_mag=12.65 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6971 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 00:39:55.28 +57:53:01.9: 12.20 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:39:55.28 +57:53:01.9: 12.22 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.21 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:39:55.28 +57:53:01.9: ref_mag=12.21 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4757 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 00:53:28.70 +52:41:40.6: 11.91 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:53:28.70 +52:41:40.6: 11.91 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.91 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:53:28.70 +52:41:40.6: ref_mag=11.91 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8622 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 01:11:05.21 +56:47:03.4: 12.61 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:11:05.21 +56:47:03.4: 12.67 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.64 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:11:05.21 +56:47:03.4: ref_mag=12.64 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4400 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 00:48:07.16 +53:46:55.6: 12.68 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:48:07.16 +53:46:55.6: 12.68 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.68 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:48:07.16 +53:46:55.6: ref_mag=12.68 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7642 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 00:53:30.04 +55:37:00.5: 13.07 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 00:44:04.03 +55:36:58.6: 13.34 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:44:04.03 +55:36:58.6: 13.33 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.34 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:44:04.03 +55:36:58.6: ref_mag=13.34 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0521 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:53:30.04 +55:37:00.5: 13.09 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.08 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:53:30.04 +55:37:00.5: ref_mag=13.08 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8491 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 01:43:48.95 +55:54:25.1: 12.75 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 00:45:37.87 +56:46:43.5: 13.24 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:43:48.95 +55:54:25.1: 12.76 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 01:03:18.72 +53:54:15.6: 13.19 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.76 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:43:48.95 +55:54:25.1: ref_mag=12.76 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6489 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 02:12:08.73 +57:19:28.0: 12.58 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:45:37.87 +56:46:43.5: 13.32 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.28 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:45:37.87 +56:46:43.5: ref_mag=13.28 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2485 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 01:44:32.43 +58:45:36.3: 12.89 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:03:18.72 +53:54:15.6: 13.19 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.19 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:03:18.72 +53:54:15.6: ref_mag=13.19 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9001 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 02:12:08.73 +57:19:28.0: 12.65 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.61 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:12:08.73 +57:19:28.0: ref_mag=12.61 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5745 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:44:32.43 +58:45:36.3: 12.98 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.93 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:44:32.43 +58:45:36.3: ref_mag=12.93 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7888 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 01:01:45.28 +55:49:40.8: 13.12 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 01:18:39.88 +58:25:51.5: 13.30 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:01:45.28 +55:49:40.8: 13.18 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.15 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:01:45.28 +55:49:40.8: ref_mag=13.15 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0288 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 01:35:18.28 +56:03:17.3: 12.90 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:18:39.88 +58:25:51.5: 13.25 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.27 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:18:39.88 +58:25:51.5: ref_mag=13.27 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1128 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 01:39:24.61 +52:15:58.9: 12.95 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 01:07:15.08 +56:23:27.3: 13.34 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:35:18.28 +56:03:17.3: 12.89 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.89 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:35:18.28 +56:03:17.3: ref_mag=12.89 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7687 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 01:29:23.56 +54:21:56.9: 12.90 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:39:24.61 +52:15:58.9: 12.92 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.93 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:39:24.61 +52:15:58.9: ref_mag=12.93 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7431 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:07:15.08 +56:23:27.3: 13.41 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 01:56:51.92 +52:27:14.1: 12.44 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.37 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:07:15.08 +56:23:27.3: ref_mag=13.37 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1319 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:56:51.92 +52:27:14.1: 12.45 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.44 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:56:51.92 +52:27:14.1: ref_mag=12.44 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6589 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:29:23.56 +54:21:56.9: 12.92 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.91 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:29:23.56 +54:21:56.9: ref_mag=12.91 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8779 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 01:39:29.91 +54:09:02.1: 13.22 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 01:17:29.13 +58:53:12.4: 13.36 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:39:29.91 +54:09:02.1: 13.12 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 01:44:45.98 +57:50:35.2: 13.13 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.17 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:39:29.91 +54:09:02.1: ref_mag=13.17 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9889 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 01:08:17.90 +54:14:52.3: 13.43 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 01:55:39.16 +55:57:31.5: 12.80 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:17:29.13 +58:53:12.4: 13.35 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.36 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:17:29.13 +58:53:12.4: ref_mag=13.36 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3173 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:44:45.98 +57:50:35.2: 13.05 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.09 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:44:45.98 +57:50:35.2: ref_mag=13.09 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0669 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:55:39.16 +55:57:31.5: 12.88 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 00:41:23.44 +53:55:49.5: 13.47 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:08:17.90 +54:14:52.3: 13.48 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.84 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:55:39.16 +55:57:31.5: ref_mag=12.84 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9001 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:08:17.90 +54:14:52.3: ref_mag=13.46 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2696 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 01:43:38.07 +55:52:11.7: 13.06 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:41:23.44 +53:55:49.5: 13.41 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:41:23.44 +53:55:49.5: ref_mag=13.44 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3737 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:43:38.07 +55:52:11.7: 13.14 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.10 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:43:38.07 +55:52:11.7: ref_mag=13.10 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9955 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 01:43:37.09 +55:35:37.5: 13.37 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 01:09:22.69 +57:26:30.9: 13.65 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 01:01:16.11 +57:25:23.4: 13.57 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:43:37.09 +55:35:37.5: 13.36 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.36 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:43:37.09 +55:35:37.5: ref_mag=13.36 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0615 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 01:16:56.02 +56:30:54.6: 13.57 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 01:33:48.68 +55:37:48.4: 13.42 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:09:22.69 +57:26:30.9: 13.66 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:01:16.11 +57:25:23.4: 13.65 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.61 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.65 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:09:22.69 +57:26:30.9: ref_mag=13.65 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5318 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:01:16.11 +57:25:23.4: ref_mag=13.61 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5147 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 01:32:28.55 +56:45:45.1: 13.78 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:16:56.02 +56:30:54.6: 13.50 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.53 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:16:56.02 +56:30:54.6: ref_mag=13.53 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3793 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 01:22:44.19 +56:45:03.8: 13.48 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:33:48.68 +55:37:48.4: 13.47 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:33:48.68 +55:37:48.4: ref_mag=13.44 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4992 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:32:28.55 +56:45:45.1: 13.86 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.82 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:32:28.55 +56:45:45.1: ref_mag=13.82 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6503 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:22:44.19 +56:45:03.8: 13.47 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:22:44.19 +56:45:03.8: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3466 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 01:43:12.37 +53:54:16.8: 13.48 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 02:15:51.54 +55:37:05.1: 13.44 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:43:12.37 +53:54:16.8: 13.41 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 01:43:12.37 +53:54:16.8: ref_mag=13.44 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4278 delta=1.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 02:15:51.54 +55:37:05.1: 13.35 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.39 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 02:15:51.54 +55:37:05.1: ref_mag=13.39 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.4128 delta=0.98 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 02:19:20.72 +55:00:24.7: 13.13 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 01:04:21.23 +55:50:19.1: 13.45 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 02:19:20.72 +55:00:24.7: 13.01 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.06 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 02:19:20.72 +55:00:24.7: ref_mag=13.06 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.1014 delta=0.96 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:04:21.23 +55:50:19.1: 13.38 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.41 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:04:21.23 +55:50:19.1: ref_mag=13.41 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2420 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 01:19:52.46 +57:38:04.7: 12.70 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:19:52.46 +57:38:04.7: 12.71 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.70 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 01:19:52.46 +57:38:04.7: ref_mag=12.70 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.7466 delta=0.96 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 01:09:49.40 +56:08:35.0: 12.38 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:09:49.40 +56:08:35.0: 12.41 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.39 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 01:09:49.40 +56:08:35.0: ref_mag=12.39 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.3937 delta=1.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 00:46:54.73 +53:57:40.1: 13.98 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 01:12:01.27 +55:04:52.0: 14.02 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-31-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0016.fits at 02:07:15.65 +54:13:31.2: 12.03 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:46:54.73 +53:57:40.1: 13.96 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 00:46:54.73 +53:57:40.1: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.0260 delta=0.95 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:12:01.27 +55:04:52.0: 14.06 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 01:12:01.27 +55:04:52.0: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.1285 delta=0.91 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-32-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 02:07:15.65 +54:13:31.2: 12.04 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.04 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 02:07:15.65 +54:13:31.2: ref_mag=12.04 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.0277 delta=1.01 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out100037.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out119077.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out124588.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out39680.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out57904.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out69301.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out76609.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out97794.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 27s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 9s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247675_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 247675_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247683_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 247683_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247691_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 247691_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247693_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 247693_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:38:52.73 +50:58:52.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247697_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 247697_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247698_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 247698_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247705_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 247705_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:04:17.10 +57:09:21.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247706_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 247706_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:40:04.18 +54:28:05.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247707_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 247707_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:18:58.02 +57:06:00.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247712_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 247712_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:42:25.08 +57:25:13.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247716_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 247716_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:23:08.35 +57:07:06.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247717_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 247717_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247718_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 247718_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247724_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 247724_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:52:48.44 +56:25:44.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247725_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 247725_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:42:59.88 +57:39:17.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247727_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 247727_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247728_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 247728_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247734_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 247734_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247736_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 247736_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247737_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 247737_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247738_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 247738_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:31:42.88 +56:11:43.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247740_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 247740_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247742_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 247742_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:53:11.47 +52:36:19.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247744_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 247744_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247746_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 247746_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:48:51.81 +54:02:10.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247747_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 247747_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:36:45.10 +54:55:32.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247748_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 247748_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:55:54.18 +52:27:11.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247750_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 247750_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:41:07.45 +51:41:46.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247786_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 247786_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:18:55.22 +57:09:19.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247817_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 247817_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:18:49.58 +57:07:20.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247823_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 247823_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:19:16.53 +57:10:59.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247832_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 247832_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:38:18.51 +57:32:28.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247839_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 247839_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:55:12.26 +54:11:10.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247848_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 247848_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:22:00.89 +57:07:32.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247865_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 247865_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:33:37.78 +58:17:00.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247870_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 247870_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:25:18.90 +57:39:17.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247871_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 247871_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:18:53.03 +57:06:45.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247878_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 247878_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:37:13.67 +53:54:01.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247881_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 247881_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:18:56.87 +57:10:51.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247889_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 247889_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247900_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 247900_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:08:42.82 +58:16:28.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247907_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 247907_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:49:08.39 +57:06:11.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247913_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 247913_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:17:44.20 +55:51:32.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247921_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 247921_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:02:22.90 +54:30:38.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247938_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 247938_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:00:49.22 +58:30:15.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247939_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 247939_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:53:50.11 +55:02:48.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247948_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 247948_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:48:14.10 +52:57:03.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247951_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 247951_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:18:49.77 +57:06:48.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247952_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 247952_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:38:00.46 +57:56:45.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247960_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 247960_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:36:03.59 +54:11:30.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247975_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 247975_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:39:03.90 +49:22:40.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247976_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 247976_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:45:07.26 +55:14:30.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247985_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 247985_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:18:04.17 +57:32:05.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247991_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 247991_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247994_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 247994_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:19:17.69 +57:07:30.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247997_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 247997_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:04:25.19 +54:27:01.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248004_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 248004_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:49:02.33 +57:04:24.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248006_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 248006_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:33:42.12 +58:17:37.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248007_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 248007_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:38:05.55 +58:00:17.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248023_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 248023_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:32:51.88 +55:15:30.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248028_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 248028_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:04:32.57 +57:59:16.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248030_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 248030_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:16:47.29 +57:00:22.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248034_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 248034_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:08:42.40 +58:17:01.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248059_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 248059_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:22:19.86 +57:15:36.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248061_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 248061_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:45:43.36 +56:47:40.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248071_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 248071_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248078_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 248078_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:20:10.92 +58:12:09.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248079_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 248079_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:10:54.49 +57:40:45.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248080_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 248080_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:55:07.12 +56:34:46.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248081_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 248081_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:22:19.02 +57:08:09.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248084_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 248084_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:23:02.37 +57:24:12.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248087_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 248087_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:59:54.03 +54:50:41.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248094_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 248094_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:52:09.21 +55:08:43.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248096_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 248096_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:54:38.13 +56:18:29.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248100_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 248100_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248118_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 248118_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248124_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 248124_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:56:52.58 +55:15:46.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248129_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 248129_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:59:39.86 +48:57:29.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248131_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 248131_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:09:15.57 +53:16:05.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248139_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 248139_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:18:19.15 +57:42:23.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248141_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 248141_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:36:44.09 +51:48:59.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248142_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 248142_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:52:40.26 +56:35:50.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248148_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 248148_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:30:34.50 +57:15:52.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248149_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 248149_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:21:50.63 +57:15:51.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248152_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 248152_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248155_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 248155_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:26:41.59 +53:07:25.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248175_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 248175_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248176_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 248176_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248178_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 248178_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:59:45.87 +54:50:10.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248184_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 248184_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:16:34.97 +57:02:40.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248186_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 248186_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248188_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 248188_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248192_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 248192_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:51:54.27 +55:09:54.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248195_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 248195_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:33:23.30 +57:44:24.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248202_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 248202_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:57:26.27 +52:13:07.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248205_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 248205_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:43:40.46 +55:27:24.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248209_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 248209_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:58:49.22 +48:57:11.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248211_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 248211_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:53:39.83 +55:35:56.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248215_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 248215_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:44:22.82 +57:30:37.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248216_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 248216_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:13:35.96 +57:52:28.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248217_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 248217_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:09:36.23 +57:56:55.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248221_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 248221_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248222_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 248222_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:34:14.50 +55:43:54.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248229_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 248229_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:13:33.82 +57:53:40.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248230_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 248230_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248231_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 248231_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248234_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 248234_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:31:37.47 +56:54:58.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248238_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 248238_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:59:44.66 +54:48:43.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248241_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 248241_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:16:24.28 +58:04:06.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248245_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 248245_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:28:41.71 +51:39:25.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248254_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 248254_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248255_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 248255_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:19:22.38 +58:19:19.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248258_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 248258_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248260_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 248260_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:50:19.81 +57:03:18.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248266_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 248266_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248269_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 248269_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:45:08.24 +56:50:56.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248271_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 248271_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248280_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 248280_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:00:55.25 +50:51:44.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248281_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 248281_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:39:02.97 +57:37:05.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248283_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 248283_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:56:35.26 +57:16:12.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248288_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 248288_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:42:16.65 +58:17:52.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248294_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 248294_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248301_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 248301_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248304_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 248304_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:50:08.28 +56:31:19.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248307_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 248307_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:00:51.88 +58:31:25.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248310_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 248310_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248311_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 248311_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248317_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 248317_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248339_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 248339_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:53:29.22 +56:56:20.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248343_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 248343_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248346_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 248346_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248351_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 248351_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:06:12.94 +57:43:32.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248353_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 248353_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248354_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 248354_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:00:36.81 +58:30:21.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248359_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 248359_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:53:41.45 +54:36:17.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248360_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 248360_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248369_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 248369_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:29:01.15 +55:16:41.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248383_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 248383_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248385_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 248385_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:44:51.77 +55:10:27.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248394_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 248394_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248395_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 248395_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:03:38.36 +50:32:00.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248418_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 248418_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248432_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 248432_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248437_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 248437_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:17:45.43 +57:33:59.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248441_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 248441_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:14:00.44 +59:02:35.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248443_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 248443_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248448_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 248448_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233928_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 233928_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:04:54.85 +53:15:49.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49325_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 49325_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:41:34.43 +56:56:26.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119077_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
Preparing report for the candidate 119077_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57904_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
Preparing report for the candidate 57904_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182477_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 182477_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:57:50.75 +50:50:09.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 43820_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 43820_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:31:27.77 +57:20:32.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129070_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 129070_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:07:15.76 +53:49:41.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77197_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 77197_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:47:18.82 +55:37:49.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187870_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 187870_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:50:11.23 +51:06:38.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153388_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 153388_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:29:35.00 +52:28:17.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96753_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 96753_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:34:16.52 +55:04:40.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150037_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 150037_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:05:19.35 +52:49:43.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80918_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 80918_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (35.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69301_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
Preparing report for the candidate 69301_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29021_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 29021_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:36:01.49 +57:54:42.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34692_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 34692_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:22:51.52 +57:50:32.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82858_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 82858_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35320_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 35320_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:52:19.55 +57:19:05.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 45413_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 45413_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:14:49.70 +57:23:42.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 124199_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 124199_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:04:13.18 +54:04:53.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28952_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 28952_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:03:07.29 +57:18:12.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 174083_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 174083_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:30:05.69 +50:10:02.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59252_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 59252_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:33:41.37 +56:39:51.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189148_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 189148_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:23:20.47 +51:06:21.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51807_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 51807_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:10:29.07 +57:08:51.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39680_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
Preparing report for the candidate 39680_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88714_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 88714_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:59:14.63 +55:35:06.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18846_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 18846_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:38:43.99 +58:15:42.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163940_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 163940_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:19:44.00 +52:02:30.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107164_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 107164_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:12:26.08 +54:50:07.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194532_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 194532_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:40:44.71 +51:24:05.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76609_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
Preparing report for the candidate 76609_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107095_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 107095_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:00:44.20 +54:01:07.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100037_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
Preparing report for the candidate 100037_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 124588_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
Preparing report for the candidate 124588_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94033_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 94033_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:56:13.73 +55:19:59.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97794_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
Preparing report for the candidate 97794_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 205453_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 205453_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:10:12.96 +49:10:21.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06360_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 06360_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:09:38.02 +59:05:10.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135138_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 135138_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:48:10.30 +53:34:02.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 124887_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 124887_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:59:59.98 +53:13:25.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191176_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 191176_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:03:21.68 +50:24:11.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157516_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 157516_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:12:45.37 +52:27:24.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46925_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 46925_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:38:06.75 +57:12:04.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190425_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 190425_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:41:33.03 +50:54:33.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63792_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 63792_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:40:57.25 +56:19:43.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07824_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 07824_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:01:28.10 +58:18:13.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 208024_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 208024_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:51:39.39 +49:20:46.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39422_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 39422_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:23:03.91 +57:36:34.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 123623_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 123623_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:50:29.17 +53:44:33.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32546_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 32546_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:22:06.48 +56:36:13.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 124126_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 124126_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:40:12.87 +53:52:04.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88172_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 88172_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:51:59.06 +55:08:48.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180883_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 180883_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:43:39.29 +50:41:19.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 218058_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 218058_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:58:33.49 +49:12:15.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97004_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 97004_fd_Cas-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_22-40-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
