Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 08 06.2602  2461258.7602  11.02  20:35:38.04 -14:44:38.6
 30.76624 -29.60441 galactic  Cap  Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 8.0 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
287 Nephthys                -0     -0       0  11.0    -0   -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:35:38.04 -14:44:38.6:  15.43 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:35:38.04 -14:44:38.6:  15.43 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits


fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits


fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs  wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits  wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits -crosshair 5132.08252 329.49890 image    wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits -crosshair 5138.30566 324.42981 image   

./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 08 06.26017 20 35 38.04 -14 44 38.6          11.0 R      V36

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 08 06.25987 20 35 38.08 -14 44 38.5          11.0 R      V36
     TAU0008  C2026 08 06.26047 20 35 38.00 -14 44 38.6          11.0 R      V36

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 08 06.2602*  20 35 38.04 -14 44 38.6  11.0 U             Cap       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461258.7602,11.02,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260806.2602 11.02CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 08 06.2602  2461258.7602  12.73  20:52:53.36 -07:18:27.1
 40.61225 -30.27900 galactic  Aqr  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 8.3 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
490 Veritas                  0     -0       0  12.9    -0   -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:52:53.36 -07:18:27.1:  15.70 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:52:53.36 -07:18:27.1:  15.67 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits


fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits


fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs  wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits  wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits -crosshair 7446.85938 4952.62646 image    wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits -crosshair 7453.43994 4947.64893 image   

./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 08 06.26017 20 52 53.36 -07 18 27.1          12.7 R      V36

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 08 06.25987 20 52 53.37 -07 18 27.3          12.7 R      V36
     TAU0008  C2026 08 06.26047 20 52 53.35 -07 18 26.9          12.7 R      V36

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 08 06.2602*  20 52 53.36 -07 18 27.1  12.7 U             Aqr       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461258.7602,12.73,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260806.2602 12.73CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 08 06.2602  2461258.7602  13.08  20:18:57.85 -10:55:21.0
 32.82035 -24.33559 galactic  Cap  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 8.1 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
1058 Grubba                  -2     -1       2  13.1     0   -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:18:57.85 -10:55:21.0:  15.79 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:18:57.85 -10:55:21.0:  15.77 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits


fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits


fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs  wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits  wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits -crosshair 2530.65576 2470.07275 image    wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits -crosshair 2537.15259 2465.29932 image   

./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 08 06.26017 20 18 57.85 -10 55 21.0          13.1 R      V36

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 08 06.25987 20 18 57.86 -10 55 21.2          13.1 R      V36
     TAU0008  C2026 08 06.26047 20 18 57.85 -10 55 20.8          13.1 R      V36

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 08 06.2602*  20 18 57.85 -10 55 21.0  13.1 U             Cap       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461258.7602,13.08,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260806.2602 13.08CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field Cap-01-Q1b1x1 reference image: Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Field Cap-01-Q1b1x1 reference image: Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Field Cap-01-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits
Field Cap-01-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits

## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461241.82588149 20.07.2026 07:49:06.161   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
First image: 2461241.82588149 20.07.2026 07:49:06.161   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Last  image: 2461258.76046819 06.08.2026 06:14:54.452   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 4
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.76
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  10.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     55000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.37            # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  13587
Objects passed selection criteria:  13555
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.3    4.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.3    4.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 11789.2
Average stars matched: 11556.5 (98.0257 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   239224 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Wed Aug  5 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-189-g49d3cdfd
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-05)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Thu Aug  6 01:22:58 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461241.82588149 20.07.2026 07:49:06.161   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
First image: 2461241.82588149 20.07.2026 07:49:06.161   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Last  image: 2461258.76046819 06.08.2026 06:14:54.452   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 34
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.52
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 29 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  2.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     57000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.83            # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  87568
Objects passed selection criteria:  87433
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.2    4.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.2    4.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 74332.5
Average stars matched: 72164 (97.0827 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   578416 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Wed Aug  5 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-189-g49d3cdfd
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-05)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Thu Aug  6 01:24:21 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Cap-01-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Cap-01-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Cap-01-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 133540 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 133540 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 

Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:

MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes


renamed 'Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.png' -> 'transient_report/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits_preview.png'

Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits


renamed 'Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.png' -> 'transient_report/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits_preview.png'

Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits




Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 760.1159
INFO:         REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 571.7854
INFO:    SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1831.7245
INFO:            SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 604.5154
INFO:   SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1867.6943
INFO:           SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 594.9656
----------------------------------------------
INFO:      ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.4098
INFO:                  SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.016
INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     28.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits 
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits
Header: 67 keys total, 4 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-06T01:14:02.4307024' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-06T06:14:02.4307024' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61258.2597503471 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-06T06:14:12.3346651' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61258.2598649766 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     308.568312937003 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =    -9.99946269419633 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     46.2808333333333 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     176.438055555556 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     1.38237940765574 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =     33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=    -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'Cap-01'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '20 34 17'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-10 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                29516 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                29516 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     28.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     28.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 56: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 57: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 58: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 59: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 60: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 61: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 62: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 63: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 64: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/d_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits :)

Spent 0.635931 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/d_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 26658.571233
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=17308.5, right_median=19900.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     28.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits 
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits
Header: 67 keys total, 4 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-06T01:14:54.4520297' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-06T06:14:54.4520297' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61258.2603524537 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-06T06:15:04.3522924' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61258.2604670371 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     308.568312916304 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =    -9.99946271419897 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     46.2916666666667 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     176.747777777778 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     1.38213039390807 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =     33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=    -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'Cap-01'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '20 34 17'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-10 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                29516 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                29516 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     28.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     28.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 56: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 57: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 58: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 59: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 60: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 61: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 62: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 63: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 64: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/d_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits :)

Spent 0.603173 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/d_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 26658.571233
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=17308.5, right_median=19900.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:


fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits



fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits




Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1

  ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461258.75986609
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits'
wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits'
wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits'
wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.8'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:16.286 -09:58:34.63 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits
Image size: 940.6'x626.5'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:28.907 -09:58:22.56 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:16.286 -09:58:34.63
Second-epoch image center 20:34:28.907 -09:58:22.56
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0519 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits
Image size: 940.7'x626.5'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:26.401 -09:57:50.66 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:16.286 -09:58:34.63
Second-epoch image center 20:34:26.401 -09:57:50.66
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0433 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  20:34:28.907 -09:58:22.56
Second-epoch second image center 20:34:26.401 -09:57:50.66
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01358 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits &> /tmp/tmp.hkDq9ZMv6v
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits &> /tmp/tmp.yv4TK7eVRu
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LYuOfkmO5b
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits &> /tmp/tmp.TxvzR6GzFg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat 
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 14476 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.2012 to 316.7417 deg, Dec -15.5581 to -4.2220 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.2012 to 316.7417 deg, Dec -15.5581 to -4.2220 deg
Loaded 10223 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7857 out of 8140 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8140 out of 14476 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.734000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.734000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.76
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  14.97

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  14.97

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 14476 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.2012 to 316.7417 deg, Dec -15.5581 to -4.2220 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.2012 to 316.7417 deg, Dec -15.5581 to -4.2220 deg
Loaded 10223 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7857 out of 8140 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8140 out of 14476 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 14495 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.2013 to 316.7416 deg, Dec -15.5578 to -4.2219 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.2013 to 316.7416 deg, Dec -15.5578 to -4.2219 deg
Loaded 10223 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7839 out of 8130 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8130 out of 14495 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.6 pix  Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
 2.6 pix  Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
 3.3 pix  fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits
 3.3 pix  fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.0 mag.  Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
 15.0 mag.  Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
 14.3 mag.  fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits
 14.2 mag.  fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  14.2 (SNR )  11.6 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.hkDq9ZMv6v (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=755, bad_region=0, passed=14476
Got 14476 stars (including 13702 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14476 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4875 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14476 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14476 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14476 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Excluding outliers - 4875 stars left (next iteration limit 5362)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits N_match=4875 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.275 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.220 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.277 n_q1=1163 n_q2=1365 n_q3=1107 n_q4=1240 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.134
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits -region wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.yv4TK7eVRu (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=763, bad_region=0, passed=14495
Got 14495 stars (including 13716 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14495 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4875 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14495 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4902 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14495 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14495 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Excluding outliers - 4874 stars left (next iteration limit 5362)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits N_match=4874 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.287 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.238 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.288 n_q1=1171 n_q2=1357 n_q3=1105 n_q4=1241 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.141
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits -region wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.LYuOfkmO5b (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=403, bad_region=0, passed=9422
Got 9422 stars (including 9011 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9422 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013064 (47.0 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010451 (37.6 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4897 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4876 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9422 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4896 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9422 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9422 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 
Excluding outliers - 4874 stars left (next iteration limit 5362)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4874 robust_rms=9.571 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.538 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4874 robust_rms=0.374 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.399 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4874 robust_rms=0.306 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.403 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=4874 robust_rms_before=0.816 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.318 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.374 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.411 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.399
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.411 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits N_match=4874 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.415 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.268 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.281 n_q1=1135 n_q2=1087 n_q3=1425 n_q4=1227 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.311
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.TxvzR6GzFg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=390, bad_region=0, passed=9053
Got 9053 stars (including 8656 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9053 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013065 (47.0 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010452 (37.6 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4878 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9053 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4898 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9053 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9053 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Excluding outliers - 4876 stars left (next iteration limit 5365)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4876 robust_rms=9.519 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.586 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4876 robust_rms=0.381 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.410 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4876 robust_rms=0.311 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.405 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=4876 robust_rms_before=0.819 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.329 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.381 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.420 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.410
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.420 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits N_match=4876 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.323 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.439 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.273 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.269 n_q1=1107 n_q2=1126 n_q3=1363 n_q4=1280 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.359
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits sigma_overall=0.275 worst_q_ratio=1.134
ref2=Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits sigma_overall=0.287 worst_q_ratio=1.141
new1=fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits sigma_overall=0.317 worst_q_ratio=1.311
new2=fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits sigma_overall=0.323 worst_q_ratio=1.359
reference average sigma_overall=0.281 worst_q_ratio=1.1375
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################

Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234_astrometric_residuals.png (4875 matched stars from wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235_astrometric_residuals.png (4874 matched stars from wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202_astrometric_residuals.png (4874 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203_astrometric_residuals.png (4876 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)


Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:35:38.04 -14:44:38.6:  15.43 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:35:38.04 -14:44:38.6:  15.43 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20887.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20887_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
Preparing report for the candidate 20887_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20903_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 20903_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 06.26047    2461258.76047    11.55    20:07:16.64 -13:15:16.2   0907 0913   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits

**** FOUND  20:07:16.66 -13:15:16.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04121_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 04121_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 08 06.26047    2461258.76047    10.19    20:22:13.35 -07:21:03.8   2869 4650   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits

**** FOUND  20:22:13.35 -07:21:03.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11505_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 11505_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 08 06.26047    2461258.76047    10.90    20:23:53.16 -12:49:16.7   3344 1374   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits

**** FOUND  20:23:53.16 -12:49:16.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 7s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cap-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
20:35:38.04 -14:44:38.6
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL

  ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.8'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:16.286 -09:58:34.63 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits
Image size: 940.6'x626.5'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:28.907 -09:58:22.56 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:16.286 -09:58:34.63
Second-epoch image center 20:34:28.907 -09:58:22.56
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0519 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits
Image size: 940.7'x626.5'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:26.401 -09:57:50.66 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:16.286 -09:58:34.63
Second-epoch image center 20:34:26.401 -09:57:50.66
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0433 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  20:34:28.907 -09:58:22.56
Second-epoch second image center 20:34:26.401 -09:57:50.66
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01358 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits &> /tmp/tmp.VfdP96XaQF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits &> /tmp/tmp.HF00Li5ZoH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits &> /tmp/tmp.IYS3boxJeH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits &> /tmp/tmp.mrsKhGEMLI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat 
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 95426 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.1405 to 316.7614 deg, Dec -15.5975 to -4.1906 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.1405 to 316.7614 deg, Dec -15.5975 to -4.1906 deg
Loaded 10309 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7294 out of 8388 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8388 out of 95426 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.648000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.648000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.52
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.13

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.13

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 95426 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.1405 to 316.7614 deg, Dec -15.5975 to -4.1906 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.1405 to 316.7614 deg, Dec -15.5975 to -4.1906 deg
Loaded 10309 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7294 out of 8388 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8388 out of 95426 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits (aperture=5.1)
Read 95800 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.1479 to 316.7695 deg, Dec -15.5883 to -4.1862 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.1479 to 316.7695 deg, Dec -15.5883 to -4.1862 deg
Loaded 10308 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7289 out of 8389 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8389 out of 95800 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits (aperture=5.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 34 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.5 pix  Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
 2.5 pix  Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
 3.0 pix  fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits
 3.0 pix  fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.1 mag.  Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
 15.1 mag.  Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
 14.5 mag.  fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits
 14.4 mag.  fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  14.4 (SNR )  13.8 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.VfdP96XaQF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=6181, bad_region=13, passed=95412
Got 95412 stars (including 89061 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 95412 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4882 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 95412 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 95412 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 95412 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Excluding outliers - 4882 stars left (next iteration limit 5370)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits N_match=4882 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.299 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.223 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.287 n_q1=1203 n_q2=1306 n_q3=1131 n_q4=1242 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.134
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits -region wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.HF00Li5ZoH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=20, blended=6280, bad_region=13, passed=95780
Got 95780 stars (including 89335 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 95780 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4882 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 95780 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 95780 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 95780 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Excluding outliers - 4882 stars left (next iteration limit 5370)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits N_match=4882 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.286 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.296 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.226 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.301 n_q1=1213 n_q2=1293 n_q3=1131 n_q4=1245 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.177
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits -region wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.IYS3boxJeH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=2914, bad_region=6, passed=55343
Got 55343 stars (including 52365 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 55343 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013064 (47.0 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010451 (37.6 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4895 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4879 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4880 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4879 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55343 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4895 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55343 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55343 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Excluding outliers - 4878 stars left (next iteration limit 5366)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits N_match=4878 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.426 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.267 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.290 n_q1=1074 n_q2=1069 n_q3=1440 n_q4=1295 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.322
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.mrsKhGEMLI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=2615, bad_region=6, passed=52858
Got 52858 stars (including 50180 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 52858 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013065 (47.0 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010452 (37.6 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4893 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4877 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52858 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4892 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52858 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52858 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Excluding outliers - 4875 stars left (next iteration limit 5363)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits N_match=4875 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.438 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.265 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.270 n_q1=1064 n_q2=1094 n_q3=1395 n_q4=1322 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.366
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:30:48.88 -08:16:32.6:  13.07 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:09:37.37 -05:24:48.4:  13.08 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:53:47.89 -07:47:30.4:  10.36 +/- 0.00  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:32:45.41 -12:38:49.8:  13.20 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:46:52.31 -11:52:15.9:  13.57 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:23:29.27 -10:55:10.2:  13.67 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:19:18.01 -10:57:55.8:  13.42 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:52:53.36 -07:18:27.1:  15.70 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:27:53.59 -05:39:35.3:  12.45 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:30:48.88 -08:16:32.6:  13.02 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:14:59.56 -04:36:08.1:  12.93 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:32:45.41 -12:38:49.8:  13.10 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:09:37.37 -05:24:48.4:  13.08 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:53:47.89 -07:47:30.4:  10.31 +/- 0.00  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:46:52.31 -11:52:15.9:  13.63 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.14 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.05 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.08 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.60 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:32:45.41 -12:38:49.8: ref_mag=13.14 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4355 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:30:48.88 -08:16:32.6: ref_mag=13.05 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1190 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:19:18.01 -10:57:55.8:  13.44 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:46:52.31 -11:52:15.9: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6392 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:09:37.37 -05:24:48.4: ref_mag=13.08 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3939 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  10.33 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:53:47.89 -07:47:30.4: ref_mag=10.33 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.4265 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.43 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:19:18.01 -10:57:55.8: ref_mag=13.43 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2721 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:23:29.27 -10:55:10.2:  13.64 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.65 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:23:29.27 -10:55:10.2: ref_mag=13.65 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7062 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:52:53.36 -07:18:27.1:  15.67 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:27:53.59 -05:39:35.3:  12.47 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.46 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:27:53.59 -05:39:35.3: ref_mag=12.46 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5093 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:14:59.56 -04:36:08.1:  12.98 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.96 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:14:59.56 -04:36:08.1: ref_mag=12.96 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9215 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:18:57.85 -10:55:21.0:  15.79 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:15:20.42 -05:31:12.1:  13.13 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:11:38.38 -06:57:29.6:  13.23 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:48:58.33 -06:44:23.0:  13.34 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 21:00:34.56 -11:01:18.9:  13.28 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:35:28.11 -12:56:37.4:  13.31 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:27:03.20 -08:11:47.7:  13.59 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:35:03.33 -07:27:27.6:  13.58 +/- 0.06  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:18:57.85 -10:55:21.0:  15.77 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:15:20.42 -05:31:12.1:  13.20 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:48:58.33 -06:44:23.0:  13.25 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 21:00:34.56 -11:01:18.9:  13.39 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:11:38.38 -06:57:29.6:  13.29 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:35:28.11 -12:56:37.4:  13.33 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.29 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.16 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.33 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.32 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.26 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:48:58.33 -06:44:23.0: ref_mag=13.29 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1711 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:15:20.42 -05:31:12.1: ref_mag=13.16 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1970 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:00:34.56 -11:01:18.9: ref_mag=13.33 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3734 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:35:28.11 -12:56:37.4: ref_mag=13.32 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2749 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:11:38.38 -06:57:29.6: ref_mag=13.26 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1912 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:27:03.20 -08:11:47.7:  13.55 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.57 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:27:03.20 -08:11:47.7: ref_mag=13.57 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3728 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:16:00.39 -07:35:45.7:  13.41 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:35:03.33 -07:27:27.6:  13.60 +/- 0.06  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.59 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:35:03.33 -07:27:27.6: ref_mag=13.59 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5367 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:16:00.39 -07:35:45.7:  13.45 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.43 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:16:00.39 -07:35:45.7: ref_mag=13.43 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3225 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:54:29.52 -05:21:44.3:  14.40 +/- 0.12  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:37:33.67 -06:24:37.9:  13.77 +/- 0.06  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:53:31.24 -06:13:58.2:  13.80 +/- 0.07  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:19:07.02 -10:01:46.5:  13.53 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:54:29.52 -05:21:44.3:  14.63 +/- 0.15  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.49 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:54:29.52 -05:21:44.3: ref_mag=14.49 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.5540 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:37:33.67 -06:24:37.9:  13.85 +/- 0.06  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.81 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:37:33.67 -06:24:37.9: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9835 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:53:31.24 -06:13:58.2:  13.68 +/- 0.06  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.74 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:53:31.24 -06:13:58.2: ref_mag=13.74 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8165 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:19:07.02 -10:01:46.5:  13.56 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.55 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:19:07.02 -10:01:46.5: ref_mag=13.55 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3111 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out113698.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out113736.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113585_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 113585_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 06.25987    2461258.75987    13.76    20:23:29.24 -10:55:10.5   3200 2520   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 06.26047    2461258.76047    13.65    20:23:29.31 -10:55:09.9   3207 2515   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113589_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 113589_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 06.25987    2461258.75987    13.65    20:46:52.43 -11:52:14.5   6684 2155   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 06.26047    2461258.76047    13.63    20:46:52.20 -11:52:17.2   6690 2149   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113600_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 113600_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 06.25987    2461258.75987    13.41    20:32:45.41 -12:38:49.7   4634 1571   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 06.26047    2461258.76047    13.47    20:32:45.41 -12:38:49.8   4640 1566   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113604_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 113604_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 06.25987    2461258.75987    13.37    20:19:17.92 -10:57:53.2   2582 2448   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 06.26047    2461258.76047    13.18    20:19:18.10 -10:57:58.3   2589 2443   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113610_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 113610_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 06.26047    2461258.76047    13.05    20:09:30.54 -09:43:11.2   1071 3082   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits

**** FOUND  20:09:30.46 -09:43:10.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113612_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 113612_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 06.25987    2461258.75987    13.37    20:09:37.51 -05:24:46.6   0870 5700   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 06.26047    2461258.76047    13.44    20:09:37.22 -05:24:50.1   0876 5695   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113615_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 113615_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 06.25987    2461258.75987    13.19    20:30:48.96 -08:16:32.7   4182 4181   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 06.26047    2461258.76047    13.07    20:30:48.80 -08:16:32.5   4188 4176   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113624_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 113624_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 06.25987    2461258.75987    10.45    20:53:47.88 -07:47:30.5   7597 4666   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 06.26047    2461258.76047    10.41    20:53:47.91 -07:47:30.4   7604 4661   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113648_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 113648_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 06.26047    2461258.76047    11.06    20:35:38.01 -14:44:38.6   5138 0324   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits

**** FOUND  20:35:38.04 -14:44:38.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113657_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 113657_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 06.26047    2461258.76047    11.78    20:52:40.64 -08:56:57.1   7467 3954   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits

**** FOUND  20:52:40.64 -08:56:57.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113681_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 113681_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 06.25987    2461258.75987    12.45    20:27:53.58 -05:39:35.4   3643 5732   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 06.26047    2461258.76047    12.63    20:27:53.61 -05:39:35.1   3649 5727   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113698_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
Preparing report for the candidate 113698_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113706_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 113706_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 06.25987    2461258.75987    12.89    20:14:59.46 -04:36:09.3   1648 6250   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 06.26047    2461258.76047    12.98    20:14:59.67 -04:36:06.9   1655 6245   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113713_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 113713_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 06.26047    2461258.76047    12.71    20:12:20.20 -12:37:04.5   1630 1365   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits

**** FOUND  20:12:20.26 -12:37:05.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113730_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 113730_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 06.25987    2461258.75987    13.18    20:48:58.31 -06:44:22.8   6841 5265   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 06.26047    2461258.76047    13.16    20:48:58.35 -06:44:23.2   6848 5260   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113733_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 113733_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 06.25987    2461258.75987    13.20    20:15:20.49 -05:31:12.5   1744 5694   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 06.26047    2461258.76047    13.19    20:15:20.35 -05:31:11.6   1751 5689   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113736_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
Preparing report for the candidate 113736_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113738_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 113738_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 06.25987    2461258.75987    13.19    20:11:38.37 -06:57:29.8   1252 4782   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 06.26047    2461258.76047    13.19    20:11:38.40 -06:57:29.5   1259 4777   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113766_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 113766_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 06.25987    2461258.75987    13.38    21:00:34.50 -11:01:20.2   8701 2757   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 06.26047    2461258.76047    13.36    21:00:34.63 -11:01:17.6   8708 2752   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113767_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 113767_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 06.25987    2461258.75987    13.27    20:35:28.17 -12:56:36.7   5042 1417   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 06.26047    2461258.76047    13.28    20:35:28.06 -12:56:38.1   5049 1412   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113777_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 113777_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 06.25987    2461258.75987    13.38    20:27:03.21 -08:11:47.1   3619 4193   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 06.26047    2461258.76047    13.37    20:27:03.19 -08:11:48.3   3625 4188   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113790_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 113790_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 06.25987    2461258.75987    13.53    20:35:03.28 -07:27:29.1   4783 4712   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 06.26047    2461258.76047    13.54    20:35:03.39 -07:27:26.0   4789 4708   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113794_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 113794_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 06.26047    2461258.76047    13.43    20:20:26.67 -06:23:27.7   2561 5212   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits

**** FOUND  20:20:26.73 -06:23:27.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113799_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 113799_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 06.25987    2461258.75987    13.52    20:16:00.48 -07:35:47.8   1941 4443   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 06.26047    2461258.76047    13.19    20:16:00.31 -07:35:43.6   1947 4438   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113834_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 113834_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 06.25987    2461258.75987    13.87    20:53:31.25 -06:13:59.2   7513 5609   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 06.26047    2461258.76047    13.77    20:53:31.23 -06:13:57.2   7519 5605   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113843_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 113843_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 06.25987    2461258.75987    13.93    20:37:33.73 -06:24:39.0   5120 5367   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 06.26047    2461258.76047    14.08    20:37:33.60 -06:24:36.8   5126 5362   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113885_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 113885_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 06.25987    2461258.75987    14.55    20:54:29.44 -05:21:43.2   7636 6147   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 06.26047    2461258.76047    14.56    20:54:29.59 -05:21:45.4   7643 6142   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55761_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 55761_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 06.25987    2461258.75987    13.20    20:19:07.01 -10:01:47.1   2514 3009   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0202.fits
Discovery image 3     2026 08 06.26047    2461258.76047    13.52    20:19:07.03 -10:01:45.9   2521 3005   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71630_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 71630_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 08 06.26047    2461258.76047    11.54    20:07:16.65 -13:15:16.2   0907 0913   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits

**** FOUND  20:07:16.67 -13:15:16.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71908_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 71908_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 08 06.26047    2461258.76047    11.60    20:11:03.32 -13:18:57.3   1472 0925   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits

**** FOUND  20:11:03.31 -13:18:57.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79549_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 79549_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 08 06.26047    2461258.76047    10.94    20:23:53.18 -12:49:16.7   3344 1374   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits

**** FOUND  20:23:53.18 -12:49:16.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66789_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 66789_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 08 06.26047    2461258.76047    12.65    20:48:08.49 -14:46:59.9   6969 0395   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits

**** FOUND  20:48:08.45 -14:46:59.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28791_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 28791_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 08 06.26047    2461258.76047    10.16    20:22:13.35 -07:21:03.8   2869 4650   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits

**** FOUND  20:22:13.36 -07:21:03.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69949_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203
The candidate 69949_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 08 06.26047    2461258.76047    12.20    20:26:13.21 -13:47:56.8   3726 0808   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012034_TTUQ1b1x1_2564042_kZ85IDy4/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_01-14-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0203.fits

**** FOUND  20:26:13.25 -13:47:56.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 10s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cap-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
20:35:38.04 -14:44:38.6
20:52:53.36 -07:18:27.1
20:18:57.85 -10:55:21.0
########### Completed Cap-01-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
20:35:38.04 -14:44:38.6
20:52:53.36 -07:18:27.1
20:18:57.85 -10:55:21.0
###################################################################################
20:35:38.04 -14:44:38.6  -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
20:52:53.36 -07:18:27.1  -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
20:18:57.85 -10:55:21.0  -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO  ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461258.75986609 -observatory V36
07:45:51.58 +20:23:16.9 Mercury (-0.3mag)
11:55:49.81 -00:05:11.3 Venus (-4.3mag)
05:43:33.51 +23:32:44.5 Mars (1.3mag)
08:41:10.33 +18:47:50.1 Jupiter (-1.8mag)
00:56:32.83 +03:16:45.5 Saturn (0.6mag)
04:11:30.01 +20:56:21.3 Uranus (5.8mag)
00:16:12.67 +00:13:57.8 Neptune (7.7mag)
20:28:19.76 -23:29:25.2 Pluto (14.4mag)
02:49:29.72 +20:50:38.7 Moon (-10.3mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 Aug  6 01:22 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461258.75986609:
08:41:16.77 +18:47:22.6 Io (6.0mag)
08:41:06.46 +18:48:07.3 Europa (6.3mag)
08:41:07.40 +18:48:06.7 Ganymede (5.6mag)
08:40:56.94 +18:48:50.5 Callisto (6.7mag)
08:38:46.17 +18:46:01.5 Himalia (15.7mag)
08:41:08.44 +18:47:58.9 Thebe (16.6mag)
08:38:16.84 +18:44:56.3 Elara (17.7mag)
08:45:16.26 +18:28:13.6 Pasiphae (17.9mag)
08:44:28.99 +18:57:41.1 Carme (19.0mag)
00:56:30.39 +03:17:12.5 Titan (8.4mag)
00:56:27.00 +03:16:48.6 Rhea (9.7mag)
00:56:36.58 +03:15:08.1 Iapetus (11.1mag)
00:56:19.33 +03:16:59.4 Hyperion (14.4mag)
00:55:57.81 +03:10:11.9 Phoebe (16.5mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Aug  6 01:23 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461258.75986609:
18:55:32.10 -24:02:07.7 JWST
17:15:52.98 +40:47:25.9 Chandra
09:44:17.48 -54:50:57.0 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Aug  6 01:23 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461258.75986609 -observatory V36
03:11:26.05 +17:12:39.3 17.7mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist)
18:02:23.74 -34:38:23.1 14.0mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
06:51:57.22 -68:49:44.4 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
06:09:17.69 +32:57:08.2 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
03:37:50.44 +36:45:04.8 16.7mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
22:40:14.83 +31:33:48.5 17.3mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
06:41:31.24 +26:34:29.2 16.8mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
10:19:45.11 +28:33:28.7 17.0mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
09:27:32.63 +05:17:43.9 17.9mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
15:12:09.51 -12:12:33.7 17.9mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
21:13:21.92 +66:13:40.9 17.9mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
15:49:51.85 -12:45:09.3 14.3mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
08:05:52.82 +31:15:26.8 15.2mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:07:17.34 +15:36:58.3 17.7mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
19:05:37.43 +42:57:51.3 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
21:13:36.77 +49:04:52.2 17.6mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS)
05:13:33.23 -12:59:36.4 15.5mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
06:54:56.44 +24:30:05.3 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
07:29:57.97 -15:52:19.0 17.7mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS)
10:30:10.62 +21:01:43.8 17.3mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
12:56:57.72 +02:28:46.8 17.0mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
16:03:40.96 +78:00:54.2 16.8mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
03:06:43.97 +46:08:46.2 17.1mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
11:45:10.64 +08:20:11.7 17.3mag A/2026 E1
21:56:09.24 -26:28:20.5 6.9mag 10P/Tempel
11:27:47.33 -03:16:43.2 16.2mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
04:36:48.19 +32:15:55.9 18.0mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson
11:03:40.98 +05:17:05.0 17.2mag 63P/Wild
00:54:17.87 -05:22:47.1 15.4mag 65P/Gunn
05:31:05.09 +20:43:44.9 13.7mag 78P/Gehrels
20:39:45.46 -23:17:47.3 17.8mag 84P/Giclas
02:58:45.77 +13:32:33.3 16.7mag 88P/Howell
07:50:51.43 +27:55:25.4 16.1mag 93P/Lovas
04:00:49.98 +16:06:38.1 17.6mag 112P/Urata-Niijima
05:49:59.33 +30:30:40.8 16.3mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
09:13:50.02 +26:58:48.1 15.0mag 123P/West-Hartley
11:39:48.35 -09:30:44.1 17.1mag 124P/Mrkos
05:33:39.09 +21:11:10.4 16.1mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
06:25:08.82 +18:59:40.2 17.9mag 131P/Mueller
00:03:41.55 +03:25:20.9 17.6mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma
03:21:33.60 -19:44:49.5 14.0mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
07:09:21.91 +37:41:31.6 15.8mag 162P/SidingSpring
15:49:18.44 +39:31:19.9 12.3mag 169P/NEAT
02:39:22.48 +09:28:34.9 17.6mag 220P/McNaught
16:40:36.31 -09:56:49.2 17.6mag 235P/LINEAR
20:23:42.25 -52:50:56.7 17.8mag 259P/Garradd
03:16:23.42 +24:20:06.9 15.4mag 260P/McNaught
06:59:26.77 +37:45:15.2 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR
15:09:51.61 +03:21:17.9 17.7mag 391P/Kowalski
08:59:05.66 +18:28:20.2 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.5K Aug  6 01:23 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90  AT2026wek  2026-08-3.82 17.17
14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60  ASASSN-26ev  2026-08-2.15 14.02
12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20  SN2026wgm  2026-08-1.73 15.61
16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00  ASASSN-26er  2026-07-25.82 15.09
01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00  SN2026vbh  2026-07-25.61 15.97
21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90  ASASSN-26eq  2026-07-24.37 15.13
18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60  ASASSN-26ep  2026-07-23.47 -4.06
12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50  ASASSN-26et  2026-07-22.76 13.98
13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60  SN2026uwk  2026-07-21.75 16.38
18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90  ASASSN-26en  2026-07-21.77 14.63
14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10  ASASSN-26es  2026-07-20.79 15.36
20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00  ASASSN-26em  2026-07-20.94 16.83
18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70  ASASSN-26eu  2026-07-20.93 14.86
03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40  AT2026ugi  2026-07-20.03 17.12
18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80  ASASSN-26eo  2026-07-19.36 16.16
04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80  ASASSN-26ej  2026-07-16.17 17.02
18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90  ASASSN-26ek  2026-07-16.24 15.73
17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50  ASASSN-26el  2026-07-15.86 16.01
14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30  ASASSN-26ei  2026-07-16.17 16.46
10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10  AT 2023mhb  2026-07-14.73 16.67
14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20  AT 2026unl  2026-07-15.27 17.11
10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80  ASASSN-26eh  2026-07-14.72 16.58
19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80  ASASSN-22le  2026-07-14.15 15.5
02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30  ASASSN-26ef  2026-07-12.35 15.86
23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70  SN 2026qtn  2026-07-12.22 16.47
02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40  ASASSN-26ec  2026-07-11.53 2.78
18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50  AT2026stb  2026-07-11.28 -1.29
13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00  AT2026pjf  2026-07-10.18 -0.72
17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70  SN2026pir  2026-07-9.86 -0.66
11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30  ASASSN-26ed  2026-07-8.8 -1.3
23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10  AT2026qil  2026-07-9.3 16.15
20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10  ASASSN-26ee  2026-07-7.22 15.53
19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80  AT2026ryu  2026-07-7.17 14.88
11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50  AT2026qqg  2026-07-5.01 16.82
19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30  AT2026qly  2026-07-5.02 17.31
17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10  ASASSN-26ea  2026-07-5.07 16.67
19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30  ASASSN-26eb  2026-07-4.97 15.52
18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20  SN 2026qqp  2026-07-5.03 -0.92
19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90  ASASSN-26dz  2026-07-5.14 15.91
19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90  AT 2026rdg  2026-07-3.43 11.81
04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40  AT 2026qpr  2026-06-30.4 15.96
13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80  SN 2026pub  2026-06-30.09 16.01
16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70  SN 2026pel  2026-06-26.38 16.07
10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30  ASASSN-26dy  2026-06-25.99 15.63
14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30  ASASSN-26dv  2026-06-23.03 14.62
13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70  ASASSN-26dw  2026-06-23.04 16.09
00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20  SN 2026mke  2026-06-22.39 17.13
11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50  SN 2026nmv  2026-06-22.06 16.56
21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50  AT2026oxh  2026-06-22.15 17.14
17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90  ASASSN-26dx  2026-06-22.02 14.72
14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10  AT2026pvk  2026-06-22.06 16.53
20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20  AT2026plb  2026-06-21.31 16.4
15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30  SN2026ore  2026-06-21.29 17.57
23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30  AT2026oxl  2026-06-21.52 17.64
17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20  AT2026ouj  2026-06-20.92 15.15
00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20  AT2026ntk  2026-06-18.09 17.34
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20  ASASSN-26du  2026-06-15.39 15.93
23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00  SN2026oxc  2026-06-14.35 16.83
02:02:26.67 +32:04:22.70  AT2026ovz  2026-06-14.6 15.52
21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50  AT2026nwc  2026-06-11 17.05
17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20  SN 2026odc  2026-06-11.23 17.62
13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20  SN 2026nyq  2026-06-11.1 16.24
00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90  ASASSN-26dt  2026-06-11.13 10.22
14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60  SN2026nyp  2026-06-10.3 16.32
12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50  SN2026mta  2026-06-8.29 16.69
12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20  SN2026oao  2026-06-9.32 17.02
10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60  AT2026nvf  2026-06-8.12 16.75
13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00  SN2026npn  2026-06-8.02 17.58
00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20  ASASSN-26dq  2026-06-7.43 13.58
01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70  SN 2026obc  2026-06-7.43 15.15
21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90  ASASSN-26dr  2026-06-7.24 16.24
06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00  ASASSN-26ds  2026-06-2.97 15.02
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40  SN2026mho  2026-05-25.18 -1.12
11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10  AT2026min  2026-05-24.21 16.63
11:44:33.11 -68:48:32.90  ASASSN-26no  2026-05-24.03 8.35
19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60  ASASSN-26dp  2026-05-22.31 -3.28
14:23:56.72 -58:37:47.60  ASASSN-26dn  2026-05-20.01 14.64
11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60  AT2026nma  2026-05-20.29 15.46
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10  AT2026lli  2026-05-19.34 15.86
00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70  AT2026nad  2026-05-19.39 15.34
15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40  ASASSN-26dm  2026-05-19.03 14.44
11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10  ASASSN-26dl  2026-05-18.02 13.55
13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00  ASASSN-26dk  2026-05-18.16 12.96
02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60  ASASSN-26dh  2026-05-18.43 15.37
17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90  ASASSN-26dj  2026-05-17.05 15.7
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10  ASASSN-26dg  2026-05-13.41 16.8
16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40  AT2026mhn  2026-05-12.33 15.8
09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00  ASASSN-26di  2026-05-12.14 14.63
21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00  AT2026kwu  2026-05-12.26 16.9
14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90  AT2026ktm  2026-05-12.06 17.21
14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40  AT2026lkm  2026-05-11.18 16.89
12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80  SN2026kep  2026-05-9.06 17.5
13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90  AT2026lkd  2026-05-9.09 17.23
09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60  SN2026kmo  2026-05-8.99 17.51
15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.40  AT2026lxf  2026-05-8.07 13.88
10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30  ASASSN-26df  2026-05-8.21 16.52
22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60  2026lda  2026-05-7.56 16.2
21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30  ASASSN-26de  2026-05-6.29 14.51
16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60  ASASSN-26dd  2026-05-5.15 15.93
14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50  AT2026lig  2026-05-4.27 14.63
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Aug  6 01:22 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4  PNV J00425120+4116594  2022-10-26.135  19.3mag
12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0  TCP J12242510+2847120  2026-05-31.6015  14.8mag
00:56:07.13 +43:01:40.6  TCP J00560713+4301406  2026-06-01.4135  12.2mag
00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2  PNV J00424164+4115162  2026-06-02.029  17.4mag
00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2  PNV J00423868+4115582  2026-06-05.1224  19.97Umag
19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7  PNV J19004295-4831017  2026-05-25.0752  14.2mag
09:55:21.28 +69:02:52.6  PNV J09552128+6902526  2026-06-13.933  18.9mag
19:51:21.42 +37:06:40.0  TCP J19512142+3706400  2026-06-17.2942  16.8mag
19:57:03.87 +37:41:46.4  TCP J19570387+3741464  2026-06-18.2638  17.5mag
00:42:32.04 +41:10:28.3  PNV J00423204+4110283  2026-06-26.059  16.6mag
02:19:17.36 +28:57:15.8  TCP J02191736+2857158  2026-07-12.3549  12.5mag
00:44:56.43 +41:57:41.6  PNV J00445643+4157416  2026-07-13.8026  17.98Cmag
00:42:55.36 +41:17:27.0  PNV J00425536+4117270  2026-07-20.1813  17.7mag
20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9  TCP J20354364+6131329  2026-07-20.5443  14.4mag
21:17:31.48 +22:25:51.0  TCP J21173148+2225510  2026-07-23.5577  14.8mag
00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8  PNV J00412404+4049028  2026-07-25.0157  18.7mag
00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6  PNV J00430426+4102286  2026-07-26.1512  20mag
14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0  TCP J14515140+6613240  2026-07-29.2561  13.5mag
00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2  PNV J00430615+4122082  2026-07-30.0085  19.4mag
00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2  PNV J00413323+4110122  2026-08-02.8913  17.1mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 189K Aug  6 01:22 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
18:55:34.805 +34:42:05.78  AT 2026vky  2026-06-22.39 21.01
15:27:13.875 -10:50:21.14  AT 2026vkx  2026-06-14.35 20.55
13:36:43.476 +25:28:01.16  AT 2026vkw  2026-06-25.38 20.6
04:43:04.292 -16:08:54.64  AT 2026vkv  2026-01-12.30 21.72
04:48:25.928 -18:19:58.05  AT 2026vku  2026-01-26.25 21.35
12:55:24.686 +13:58:33.13  AT 2026vkt  2026-06-05.34 21.42
11:39:28.884 +47:23:59.43  AT 2026vks  2026-01-14.61 21.82
10:26:55.799 -14:09:20.42  AT 2026vkr  2026-01-13.55 21.98
12:26:22.284 +20:06:25.68  AT 2026vkq  2026-02-13.60 20.86
12:08:12.778 +41:30:56.83  AT 2026vkp  2026-06-15.27 20.88
05:11:50.298 -12:02:24.75  AT 2026vko  2026-02-15.23 20.49
00:35:37.087 -45:29:22.45  AT 2026vkn  2026-06-26.42 23.13
04:11:06.535 -49:23:35.67  AT 2026vkm  2026-07-09.42 22.31
23:40:19.411 -26:01:53.34  AT 2026vkl  2026-07-20.59 21.47
22:23:27.160 +00:54:32.97  AT 2026vkk  2026-07-14.55 21.17
21:14:05.875 -09:55:36.50  AT 2026vkj  2026-07-20.46 21.9
17:17:56.970 +19:09:32.22  AT 2026vki  2026-07-19.39 21.8
17:18:18.165 +24:21:20.44  AT 2026vkh  2026-07-19.40 21.78
18:14:11.533 +25:31:50.45  AT 2026vkg  2026-07-16.29 20.95
22:50:03.729 +40:38:42.44  AT 2026vkf  2026-07-20.53 20.32
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 87K Aug  6 01:22 tns_transients_list.txt

=== Transient Factory Profiling ===
Started: Thu Aug  6 01:22:36 CDT 2026
=======================================
TIMING SExtractor: 2 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 0 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 1 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 1 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 4s (0.07 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 30s (0.50 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 0s (0.00 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 10s (0.17 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 0s (0.00 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 1s (0.02 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 3s (0.05 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 7s (0.12 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 56s (0.93 min)
TIMING SExtractor: 17 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 6 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 1 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 4 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 31s (0.52 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 1s (0.02 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 0s (0.00 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 19s (0.32 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 1s (0.02 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 1s (0.02 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 2s (0.03 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 10s (0.17 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 64s (1.07 min)
FIELD_Cap-01-Q1b1x1: 136s (2.27 min)
=======================================
TOTAL_RUNTIME: 138s (2.30 min)
Finished: Thu Aug  6 01:24:54 CDT 2026