This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_000633_TTUQ1b1x1_2674928_OsWuhwFP
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 06.2098 2461258.7098 9.35 20:28:02.08 -26:42:49.2
16.95027 -32.02050 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 8.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.324 Bamberga 1 1 1 9.4 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:28:02.08 -26:42:49.2: 14.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:28:02.08 -26:42:49.2: 14.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 06.2098* 20 28 02.08 -26 42 49.2 9.3 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461258.7098,9.35,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260806.2098 9.35CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 06.2098 2461258.7098 10.23 20:11:05.65 -22:31:22.5
20.12379 -27.04457 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 8.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASAS J201105-2231.4
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.220 V Y 0.680 V 2452212.30000 135.135132000000
The object was found in astcheck.15916 Shigeoyamada -398 -326 515 17.4 -0 -0
NOTE: the measured brightness disagrees with the predicted asteroid brightness, but the matched variable star above likely accounts for this object.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:11:05.65 -22:31:22.5: 11.12 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:11:05.65 -22:31:22.5: 11.19 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.15 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 06.2098* 20 11 05.65 -22 31 22.5 10.2 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J201105-2231.4,2461258.7098,10.23,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J201105-2231.4 20260806.2098 10.23CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 06.2098 2461258.7098 12.04 20:43:07.18 -25:34:34.5
19.41280 -34.94229 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.4" and 8.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.388 Charybdis -0 -1 1 12.6 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:43:07.18 -25:34:34.5: 14.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:43:07.18 -25:34:34.5: 14.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 06.2098* 20 43 07.18 -25 34 34.5 12.0 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461258.7098,12.04,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260806.2098 12.04CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 06.2098 2461258.7098 11.00 20:43:03.83 -30:31:28.6
13.52386 -36.18617 galactic Mic Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.8" and 7.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 6794916614810595200 | 20:43:03.88 -30:31:27.7 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE J-Ks=0.585+/-0.031 (K)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:43:03.83 -30:31:28.6: 11.90 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:43:03.83 -30:31:28.6: 11.99 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.94 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 06.2098* 20 43 03.83 -30 31 28.6 11.0 U Mic 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 6794916614810595200,2461258.7098,11.00,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 6794916614810595200 20260806.2098 11.00CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 06.2098 2461258.7098 11.38 20:30:09.52 -29:35:50.2
13.80483 -33.25310 galactic Mic Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 8.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASAS J203010-2935.9
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.900 V Y 0.460 V 2452014.60000 68.641823000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:30:09.52 -29:35:50.2: 12.38 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:30:09.52 -29:35:50.2: 12.26 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.31 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 06.2098* 20 30 09.52 -29 35 50.2 11.4 U Mic 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J203010-2935.9,2461258.7098,11.38,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J203010-2935.9 20260806.2098 11.38CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 06.2098 2461258.7098 11.71 20:30:03.27 -28:48:49.5
14.70165 -33.02830 galactic Mic Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 7.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" NSV 25160
Type: SRB
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.500 V 14.100 V 2452917.00000 173.000000000000 M7e
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:30:03.27 -28:48:49.5: 12.72 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:30:03.27 -28:48:49.5: 12.98 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.82 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 06.2098* 20 30 03.27 -28 48 49.5 11.7 U Mic 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSV 25160,2461258.7098,11.71,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSV 25160 20260806.2098 11.71CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 06.2098 2461258.7098 11.49 19:43:09.07 -24:12:26.8
15.92564 -21.62818 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 8.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASAS J194309-2412.4
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.000 V Y 0.820 V 2452753.10000 247.393539000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:43:09.07 -24:12:26.8: 12.67 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:43:09.07 -24:12:26.8: 12.44 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.52 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J194309-2412.4,2461258.7098,11.49,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J194309-2412.4 20260806.2098 11.49CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 06.2098 2461258.7098 11.62 20:07:04.57 -28:12:25.6
13.72470 -28.01461 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 8.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" ASASSN-V J200704.58-281225.8
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.590 V 13.070 V
The object was found in astcheck.2353 Alva -156 99 185 15.1 -0 -0
NOTE: the measured brightness disagrees with the predicted asteroid brightness, but the matched variable star above likely accounts for this object.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:07:04.57 -28:12:25.6: 12.54 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:07:04.57 -28:12:25.6: 12.78 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.64 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J200704.58-281225.8,2461258.7098,11.62,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J200704.58-281225.8 20260806.2098 11.62CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 06.2098 2461258.7098 12.22 20:23:11.38 -28:39:21.2
14.40318 -31.53638 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.5" and 8.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASASSN-V J202311.55-283921.4
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.190 V 14.710 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:23:11.38 -28:39:21.2: 13.50 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:23:11.38 -28:39:21.2: 13.17 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.29 +/- 0.06
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J202311.55-283921.4,2461258.7098,12.22,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J202311.55-283921.4 20260806.2098 12.22CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 06.2098 2461258.7098 11.59 19:46:59.63 -29:43:42.7
10.59990 -24.30757 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 8.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" ASAS J194659-2943.7
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.300 V Y 0.510 V 2452160.80000 54.050159000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:46:59.63 -29:43:42.7: 12.48 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:46:59.63 -29:43:42.7: 12.57 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.52 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J194659-2943.7,2461258.7098,11.59,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J194659-2943.7 20260806.2098 11.59CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 06.2098 2461258.7098 10.97 20:22:27.65 -31:01:34.4
11.66422 -32.00726 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 7.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASAS J202228-3101.6
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.090 V Y 1.150 V 2452590.90000 296.017883000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:22:27.65 -31:01:34.4: 11.94 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:22:27.65 -31:01:34.4: 12.08 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.00 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J202228-3101.6,2461258.7098,10.97,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J202228-3101.6 20260806.2098 10.97CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 06.2098 2461258.7098 10.71 20:43:28.20 -30:44:19.2
13.28925 -36.31907 galactic Mic Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 7.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 6794863219778151424 | 20:43:28.37 -30:44:19.6 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE J-Ks=0.772+/-0.032 (K)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:43:28.20 -30:44:19.2: 11.65 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:43:28.20 -30:44:19.2: 11.78 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.71 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 06.2098* 20 43 28.20 -30 44 19.2 10.7 U Mic 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 6794863219778151424,2461258.7098,10.71,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 6794863219778151424 20260806.2098 10.71CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 06.2098 2461258.7098 9.80 20:12:42.51 -31:04:07.2
10.98476 -30.00086 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 8.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASAS J201243-3104.2
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.730 V Y 0.800 V 2452176.10000 124.639099000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:12:42.51 -31:04:07.2: 10.87 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:12:42.51 -31:04:07.2: 10.93 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.90 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J201243-3104.2,2461258.7098,9.80,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J201243-3104.2 20260806.2098 9.80CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 06.2098 2461258.7098 9.75 20:12:27.22 -31:00:09.4
11.04139 -29.93060 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 8.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASAS J201227-3100.2
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.450 V Y 0.290 V 2452098.00000 93.911919000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:12:27.22 -31:00:09.4: 10.65 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:12:27.22 -31:00:09.4: 10.73 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.69 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J201227-3100.2,2461258.7098,9.75,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J201227-3100.2 20260806.2098 9.75CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 06.2098 2461258.7098 9.65 20:02:51.58 -30:25:15.5
11.02444 -27.78814 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 8.3 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASASSN-V J200251.54-302516.9
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
10.970 V 11.300 V 2457458.00000 512.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:02:51.58 -30:25:15.5: 10.58 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:02:51.58 -30:25:15.5: 10.64 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.61 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J200251.54-302516.9,2461258.7098,9.65,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J200251.54-302516.9 20260806.2098 9.65CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 06.2098 2461258.7098 11.98 19:48:17.63 -28:21:35.0
12.12120 -24.13566 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 8.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J194817.59-282136.1
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.910 V 13.430 V 2457181.70000 64.100000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:48:17.63 -28:21:35.0: 12.96 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:48:17.63 -28:21:35.0: 12.81 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.87 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J194817.59-282136.1,2461258.7098,11.98,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J194817.59-282136.1 20260806.2098 11.98CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 06.2098 2461258.7098 9.56 20:40:17.17 -30:25:29.1
13.47599 -35.58066 galactic Mic Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 8.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 6" CP Mic
Type: SR:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.400 V 12.300 V 2451950.30000 32.949860000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:40:17.17 -30:25:29.1: 10.44 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:40:17.17 -30:25:29.1: 10.48 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.47 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 06.2098* 20 40 17.17 -30 25 29.1 9.6 U Mic 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
CP Mic,2461258.7098,9.56,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
CP Mic 20260806.2098 9.56CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461229.82627380 08.07.2026 07:49:40.056 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
First image: 2461229.82627380 08.07.2026 07:49:40.056 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Last image: 2461258.71010872 06.08.2026 05:02:23.393 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_000633_TTUQ1b1x1_2674928_OsWuhwFP/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 10
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.31
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 5747
Objects passed selection criteria: 5738
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 4780
Average stars matched: 4598 (96.1925 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 232208 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Aug 5 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-189-g49d3cdfd
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-05)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Aug 6 00:09:14 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461229.82627380 08.07.2026 07:49:40.056 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
First image: 2461229.82627380 08.07.2026 07:49:40.056 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Last image: 2461258.71010872 06.08.2026 05:02:23.393 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_000633_TTUQ1b1x1_2674928_OsWuhwFP/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 69
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.98
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 16 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 47091
Objects passed selection criteria: 47006
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 36834
Average stars matched: 34981.2 (94.97 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 269168 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Aug 5 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-189-g49d3cdfd
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-05)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Aug 6 00:10:32 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_000633_TTUQ1b1x1_2674928_OsWuhwFP/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-01-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_000633_TTUQ1b1x1_2674928_OsWuhwFP/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_000633_TTUQ1b1x1_2674928_OsWuhwFP/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-01-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_000633_TTUQ1b1x1_2674928_OsWuhwFP/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461258.70944081
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits'
wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits'
wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-01-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-01-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-01-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-01-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits'
wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.7' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:09:36.749 -25:59:53.37 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-01-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-01-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
Image size: 940.6'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:09:57.921 -25:59:48.64 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:09:36.749 -25:59:53.37
Second-epoch image center 20:09:57.921 -25:59:48.64
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0793 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
Image size: 940.6'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:10:00.773 -25:59:16.48 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:09:36.749 -25:59:53.37
Second-epoch image center 20:10:00.773 -25:59:16.48
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0906 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:09:57.921 -25:59:48.64
Second-epoch second image center 20:10:00.773 -25:59:16.48
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01392 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gQxR0jLPja
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits &> /tmp/tmp.eN2WXWHyfj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_000633_TTUQ1b1x1_2674928_OsWuhwFP/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-01-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits &> /tmp/tmp.W7PjRdgCIa
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_000633_TTUQ1b1x1_2674928_OsWuhwFP/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-01-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_000633_TTUQ1b1x1_2674928_OsWuhwFP/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits &> /tmp/tmp.tcJooSyyfo
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_000633_TTUQ1b1x1_2674928_OsWuhwFP/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits and wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits and wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits and wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 5807 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 293.3718 to 311.4457 deg, Dec -31.2594 to -20.5684 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 293.3718 to 311.4457 deg, Dec -31.2594 to -20.5684 deg
Loaded 9413 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4837 out of 4937 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4937 out of 5807 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.364800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.364800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.31
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.05
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.05
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 5807 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 293.3718 to 311.4457 deg, Dec -31.2594 to -20.5684 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 293.3718 to 311.4457 deg, Dec -31.2594 to -20.5684 deg
Loaded 9413 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4837 out of 4937 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4937 out of 5807 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits (aperture=6.4)
Read 6163 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 293.3742 to 311.4456 deg, Dec -31.2699 to -20.5799 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 293.3742 to 311.4456 deg, Dec -31.2699 to -20.5799 deg
Loaded 9413 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5072 out of 5182 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5182 out of 6163 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits (aperture=6.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 10 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
2.3 pix Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
4.0 pix fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-01-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
4.1 pix fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.1 mag. Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
14.1 mag. Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
13.0 mag. fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-01-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
12.9 mag. fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 12.9 (SNR ) 10.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.gQxR0jLPja (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_000633_TTUQ1b1x1_2674928_OsWuhwFP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=383, bad_region=0, passed=5807
Got 5807 stars (including 5421 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5807 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4925 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4910 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5807 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4925 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5807 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5807 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 4910 stars left (next iteration limit 5401)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits N_match=4910 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.435 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.515 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.419 n_q1=1316 n_q2=1090 n_q3=1311 n_q4=1193 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.182
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits -region wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.eN2WXWHyfj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_000633_TTUQ1b1x1_2674928_OsWuhwFP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=423, bad_region=0, passed=6163
Got 6163 stars (including 5735 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6163 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4906 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6163 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6163 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6163 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 4906 stars left (next iteration limit 5396)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits N_match=4906 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.427 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.450 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.514 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.402 n_q1=1330 n_q2=1056 n_q3=1323 n_q4=1197 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.202
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits -region wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.W7PjRdgCIa (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_000633_TTUQ1b1x1_2674928_OsWuhwFP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_000633_TTUQ1b1x1_2674928_OsWuhwFP/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-01-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_000633_TTUQ1b1x1_2674928_OsWuhwFP/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-01-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_000633_TTUQ1b1x1_2674928_OsWuhwFP/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-01-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_000633_TTUQ1b1x1_2674928_OsWuhwFP/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-01-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_000633_TTUQ1b1x1_2674928_OsWuhwFP/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-01-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_000633_TTUQ1b1x1_2674928_OsWuhwFP/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-01-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-01-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-01-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-01-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-01-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-01-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-01-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-01-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_000633_TTUQ1b1x1_2674928_OsWuhwFP/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-01-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-01-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=133, bad_region=0, passed=3609
Got 3609 stars (including 3474 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-01-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3609 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013064 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010451 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3402 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3384 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3384 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3384 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3609 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3402 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3385 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3609 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3385 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3609 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 3385 stars left (next iteration limit 3722)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3385 robust_rms=11.974 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=16.425 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3385 robust_rms=0.477 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.555 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3385 robust_rms=0.391 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.546 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=3385 robust_rms_before=0.935 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.422 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.477 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.643 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.555
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-01-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-01-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
Image size: 940.6'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:09:57.943 -25:59:49.21 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 3609 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-01-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_000633_TTUQ1b1x1_2674928_OsWuhwFP/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2739040.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 3, robust RMS 0.935 -> 0.477 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-01-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits N_match=3385 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.515 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.569 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.548 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.525 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.432 n_q1=714 n_q2=647 n_q3=1153 n_q4=871 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.104
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-01-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-01-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_000633_TTUQ1b1x1_2674928_OsWuhwFP/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-01-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-01-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-01-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.tcJooSyyfo (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_000633_TTUQ1b1x1_2674928_OsWuhwFP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_000633_TTUQ1b1x1_2674928_OsWuhwFP/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_000633_TTUQ1b1x1_2674928_OsWuhwFP/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_000633_TTUQ1b1x1_2674928_OsWuhwFP/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_000633_TTUQ1b1x1_2674928_OsWuhwFP/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_000633_TTUQ1b1x1_2674928_OsWuhwFP/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_000633_TTUQ1b1x1_2674928_OsWuhwFP/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_000633_TTUQ1b1x1_2674928_OsWuhwFP/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=139, bad_region=0, passed=3656
Got 3656 stars (including 3514 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3656 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013064 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010451 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3443 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3427 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3427 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3427 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3656 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3444 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3429 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3656 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3429 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3656 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 3429 stars left (next iteration limit 3769)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3429 robust_rms=11.083 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=19.720 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3429 robust_rms=0.486 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.596 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3429 robust_rms=0.392 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.578 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=3429 robust_rms_before=0.981 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.430 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.486 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.673 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.596
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
Image size: 940.6'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:10:00.794 -25:59:17.08 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 3656 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_000633_TTUQ1b1x1_2674928_OsWuhwFP/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2739049.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 3, robust RMS 0.981 -> 0.486 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits N_match=3429 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.522 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.588 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.548 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.521 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.465 n_q1=741 n_q2=614 n_q3=1224 n_q4=850 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.126
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_000633_TTUQ1b1x1_2674928_OsWuhwFP/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits sigma_overall=0.435 worst_q_ratio=1.182
ref2=Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits sigma_overall=0.427 worst_q_ratio=1.202
new1=fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-01-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits sigma_overall=0.515 worst_q_ratio=1.104
new2=fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits sigma_overall=0.522 worst_q_ratio=1.126
reference average sigma_overall=0.431 worst_q_ratio=1.192
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156_astrometric_residuals.png (4910 matched stars from wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.39 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205_astrometric_residuals.png (4906 matched stars from wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-01-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132_astrometric_residuals.png (3385 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-01-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.40 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133_astrometric_residuals.png (3429 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.41 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-01-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-01-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_000633_TTUQ1b1x1_2674928_OsWuhwFP/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-01-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_000633_TTUQ1b1x1_2674928_OsWuhwFP/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:38:13.69 -21:33:42.1: 11.66 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:44:32.65 -20:55:19.0: 11.65 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:28:02.08 -26:42:49.2: 14.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:50:21.87 -21:55:58.1: 11.63 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:11:05.65 -22:31:22.5: 11.12 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:38:13.69 -21:33:42.1: 11.32 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:44:32.65 -20:55:19.0: 11.48 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:50:21.87 -21:55:58.1: 11.44 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:11:05.65 -22:31:22.5: 11.19 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:28:02.08 -26:42:49.2: 14.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.43 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.55 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:38:13.69 -21:33:42.1: ref_mag=11.43 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=10.5255 delta=0.90 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.15 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.51 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:44:32.65 -20:55:19.0: ref_mag=11.55 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=10.3948 delta=1.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:11:05.65 -22:31:22.5: ref_mag=11.15 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.2142 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:50:21.87 -21:55:58.1: ref_mag=11.51 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.4901 delta=1.02 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out20070.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out20099.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out20196.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out04782.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20572.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20572_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
Preparing report for the candidate 20572_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20686_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 20686_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:44:43.70 -21:26:58.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20689_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 20689_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:42:01.49 -23:10:37.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20196_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 20196_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:44:32.65 -20:55:19.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=10.39, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=11.37)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.829 6868159379305748736 296.13544402118 -20.92139117455 9.8432 8.4085 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.829#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04782_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
Preparing report for the candidate 04782_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05404_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 05404_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:03:30.42 -22:16:07.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20122_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 20122_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:59:58.06 -22:58:15.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20099_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 20099_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:50:21.87 -21:55:58.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=10.49, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=11.47)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.576 6864813496703473024 297.59102554470 -21.93267495249 9.2609 7.7697 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.576#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20070_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 20070_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:38:13.69 -21:33:42.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=10.53, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=11.51)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 5.054 6772002685112407808 294.55579797198 -21.56089872216 10.0868 8.6797 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#5.054#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05282_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 05282_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:03:11.06 -22:07:40.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 10s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cap-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
20:11:05.65 -22:31:22.5
20:28:02.08 -26:42:49.2
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_000633_TTUQ1b1x1_2674928_OsWuhwFP/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-01-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_000633_TTUQ1b1x1_2674928_OsWuhwFP/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_000633_TTUQ1b1x1_2674928_OsWuhwFP/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-01-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_000633_TTUQ1b1x1_2674928_OsWuhwFP/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-01-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-01-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.7' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:09:36.749 -25:59:53.37 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-01-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-01-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
Image size: 940.6'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:09:57.921 -25:59:48.64 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:09:36.749 -25:59:53.37
Second-epoch image center 20:09:57.921 -25:59:48.64
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0793 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
Image size: 940.6'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:10:00.773 -25:59:16.48 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:09:36.749 -25:59:53.37
Second-epoch image center 20:10:00.773 -25:59:16.48
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0906 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:09:57.921 -25:59:48.64
Second-epoch second image center 20:10:00.773 -25:59:16.48
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01392 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YMBavPE8gx
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits &> /tmp/tmp.P4CcSNwV7D
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_000633_TTUQ1b1x1_2674928_OsWuhwFP/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-01-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits &> /tmp/tmp.HGtLGtoSiX
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_000633_TTUQ1b1x1_2674928_OsWuhwFP/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-01-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_000633_TTUQ1b1x1_2674928_OsWuhwFP/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YGuccO7FW2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_000633_TTUQ1b1x1_2674928_OsWuhwFP/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits and wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits and wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits and wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 49567 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 293.3398 to 311.4646 deg, Dec -31.2669 to -20.5506 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 293.3398 to 311.4646 deg, Dec -31.2669 to -20.5506 deg
Loaded 9468 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7598 out of 8155 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8155 out of 49567 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.169250
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.169250
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.98
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.19
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.19
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 49567 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 293.3398 to 311.4646 deg, Dec -31.2669 to -20.5506 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 293.3398 to 311.4646 deg, Dec -31.2669 to -20.5506 deg
Loaded 9468 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7598 out of 8155 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8155 out of 49567 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 52342 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 293.3394 to 311.4652 deg, Dec -31.2712 to -20.5387 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 293.3394 to 311.4652 deg, Dec -31.2712 to -20.5387 deg
Loaded 9484 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7577 out of 8158 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8158 out of 52342 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 64 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
2.1 pix Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
3.5 pix fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-01-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
3.5 pix fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.2 mag. Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
14.3 mag. Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
13.1 mag. fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-01-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
13.2 mag. fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.1 (SNR ) 12.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.YMBavPE8gx (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_000633_TTUQ1b1x1_2674928_OsWuhwFP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=2048, bad_region=0, passed=49554
Got 49554 stars (including 47427 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 49554 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4922 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4907 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49554 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4922 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49554 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49554 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 4907 stars left (next iteration limit 5397)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits N_match=4907 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.428 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.448 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.502 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.422 n_q1=1344 n_q2=1159 n_q3=1185 n_q4=1219 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.174
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits -region wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.P4CcSNwV7D (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_000633_TTUQ1b1x1_2674928_OsWuhwFP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=2212, bad_region=1, passed=52328
Got 52328 stars (including 50038 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 52328 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4922 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4909 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52328 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4922 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52328 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52328 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 4908 stars left (next iteration limit 5399)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits N_match=4908 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.453 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.511 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.410 n_q1=1364 n_q2=1130 n_q3=1195 n_q4=1219 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.228
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits -region wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.HGtLGtoSiX (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_000633_TTUQ1b1x1_2674928_OsWuhwFP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_000633_TTUQ1b1x1_2674928_OsWuhwFP/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-01-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_000633_TTUQ1b1x1_2674928_OsWuhwFP/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-01-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_000633_TTUQ1b1x1_2674928_OsWuhwFP/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-01-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_000633_TTUQ1b1x1_2674928_OsWuhwFP/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-01-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_000633_TTUQ1b1x1_2674928_OsWuhwFP/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-01-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_000633_TTUQ1b1x1_2674928_OsWuhwFP/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-01-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-01-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-01-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-01-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-01-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-01-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-01-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-01-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_000633_TTUQ1b1x1_2674928_OsWuhwFP/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-01-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-01-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=746, bad_region=2, passed=23119
Got 23119 stars (including 22339 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-01-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23119 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013064 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010451 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4893 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23119 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23119 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23119 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 4893 stars left (next iteration limit 5382)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-01-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-01-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits N_match=4893 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.449 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.622 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.572 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.332 n_q1=1126 n_q2=961 n_q3=1604 n_q4=1202 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.385
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-01-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-01-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_000633_TTUQ1b1x1_2674928_OsWuhwFP/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-01-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-01-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-01-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.YGuccO7FW2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_000633_TTUQ1b1x1_2674928_OsWuhwFP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_000633_TTUQ1b1x1_2674928_OsWuhwFP/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_000633_TTUQ1b1x1_2674928_OsWuhwFP/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_000633_TTUQ1b1x1_2674928_OsWuhwFP/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_000633_TTUQ1b1x1_2674928_OsWuhwFP/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_000633_TTUQ1b1x1_2674928_OsWuhwFP/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_000633_TTUQ1b1x1_2674928_OsWuhwFP/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_000633_TTUQ1b1x1_2674928_OsWuhwFP/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=741, bad_region=1, passed=23571
Got 23571 stars (including 22794 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23571 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013064 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010451 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4907 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4891 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4891 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4891 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23571 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4907 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4891 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23571 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4891 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23571 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 4891 stars left (next iteration limit 5380)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits N_match=4891 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.438 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.637 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.563 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.392 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.319 n_q1=1097 n_q2=922 n_q3=1683 n_q4=1189 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.453
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_000633_TTUQ1b1x1_2674928_OsWuhwFP/fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-01-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_000633_TTUQ1b1x1_2674928_OsWuhwFP/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-01-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-06_CI_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_000633_TTUQ1b1x1_2674928_OsWuhwFP/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:28:28.63 -24:45:06.4: 12.28 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:59:44.80 -30:54:37.7: 11.69 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:01:46.04 -22:15:43.9: 12.38 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:05:16.13 -26:45:44.8: 11.93 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:05:21.50 -23:09:08.3: 11.66 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:00:08.50 -20:55:19.8: 12.39 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:02:28.76 -27:42:16.2: 10.62 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:42:56.93 -30:18:31.7: 12.20 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:41:52.08 -20:50:40.5: 10.17 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:02:28.76 -27:42:16.2: 10.60 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:28:28.63 -24:45:06.4: 12.38 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:01:46.04 -22:15:43.9: 12.42 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:00:08.50 -20:55:19.8: 12.37 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:41:52.08 -20:50:40.5: 10.17 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:42:56.93 -30:18:31.7: 12.26 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:59:44.80 -30:54:37.7: 11.65 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:05:16.13 -26:45:44.8: 11.90 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:05:21.50 -23:09:08.3: 11.73 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.61 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.40 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.33 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:02:28.76 -27:42:16.2: ref_mag=10.61 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.8380 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:01:46.04 -22:15:43.9: ref_mag=12.40 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.4335 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:28:28.63 -24:45:06.4: ref_mag=12.33 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4218 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.38 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.17 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.23 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.67 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.70 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.91 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:00:08.50 -20:55:19.8: ref_mag=12.38 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.4879 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:42:56.93 -30:18:31.7: ref_mag=12.23 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.2069 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:59:44.80 -30:54:37.7: ref_mag=11.67 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.5287 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:41:52.08 -20:50:40.5: ref_mag=10.17 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.2250 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:05:16.13 -26:45:44.8: ref_mag=11.91 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.0071 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:05:21.50 -23:09:08.3: ref_mag=11.70 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8785 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:50:14.87 -22:46:12.0: 11.63 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:50:14.87 -22:46:12.0: 11.64 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.64 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:50:14.87 -22:46:12.0: ref_mag=11.64 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6143 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:56:04.77 -29:11:26.4: 11.65 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:43:07.18 -25:34:34.5: 14.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:43:39.02 -21:56:15.2: 12.45 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:38:15.42 -22:18:33.1: 13.50 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:47:08.45 -23:43:16.4: 12.72 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:55:58.30 -20:50:25.4: 13.05 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:53:39.15 -21:19:30.9: 14.03 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:47:30.54 -21:20:52.1: 13.99 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:56:04.77 -29:11:26.4: 11.71 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.68 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:56:04.77 -29:11:26.4: ref_mag=11.68 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.7577 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:43:07.18 -25:34:34.5: 14.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:43:39.02 -21:56:15.2: 12.49 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:38:15.42 -22:18:33.1: 13.65 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.47 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:43:39.02 -21:56:15.2: ref_mag=12.47 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.2653 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:38:15.42 -22:18:33.1: ref_mag=13.57 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=12.8858 delta=0.69 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:40:53.27 -20:39:27.5: 13.70 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:38:50.66 -24:22:09.5: 13.76 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:55:58.30 -20:50:25.4: 13.02 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:47:08.45 -23:43:16.4: 12.69 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:53:39.15 -21:19:30.9: 14.06 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.04 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.05 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:55:58.30 -20:50:25.4: ref_mag=13.04 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=12.7827 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.70 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:53:39.15 -21:19:30.9: ref_mag=14.05 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.1522 delta=0.90 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:47:08.45 -23:43:16.4: ref_mag=12.70 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.5064 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:47:30.54 -21:20:52.1: 13.70 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:47:30.54 -21:20:52.1: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.1952 delta=0.60 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:40:53.27 -20:39:27.5: 13.61 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:38:50.66 -24:22:09.5: 13.70 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.65 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:40:53.27 -20:39:27.5: ref_mag=13.65 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.2969 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.73 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:38:50.66 -24:22:09.5: ref_mag=13.73 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=12.8711 delta=0.85 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:57:00.98 -21:39:18.5: 13.81 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:46:15.92 -21:11:12.0: 13.78 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:54:30.75 -22:42:41.5: 13.99 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:52:57.01 -21:12:01.7: 13.98 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:57:00.98 -21:39:18.5: 13.83 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:46:15.92 -21:11:12.0: 13.80 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.82 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:43:03.83 -30:31:28.6: 11.90 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:57:00.98 -21:39:18.5: ref_mag=13.82 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.2945 delta=0.53 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:46:15.92 -21:11:12.0: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.3762 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:30:09.52 -29:35:50.2: 12.38 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:54:30.75 -22:42:41.5: 13.96 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:54:30.75 -22:42:41.5: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.3420 delta=0.63 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:52:57.01 -21:12:01.7: 14.01 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.00 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:52:57.01 -21:12:01.7: ref_mag=14.00 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.4968 delta=0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:30:03.27 -28:48:49.5: 12.72 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:43:03.83 -30:31:28.6: 11.99 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.94 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:43:03.83 -30:31:28.6: ref_mag=11.94 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=10.9947 delta=0.95 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:30:09.52 -29:35:50.2: 12.26 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.31 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:30:09.52 -29:35:50.2: ref_mag=12.31 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.3793 delta=0.93 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:30:03.27 -28:48:49.5: 12.98 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.82 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:30:03.27 -28:48:49.5: ref_mag=12.82 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=11.7132 delta=1.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:43:09.07 -24:12:26.8: 12.67 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:07:04.57 -28:12:25.6: 12.54 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:49:48.50 -22:28:23.0: 13.73 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:43:09.07 -24:12:26.8: 12.44 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:23:11.38 -28:39:21.2: 13.50 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.52 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:43:09.07 -24:12:26.8: ref_mag=12.52 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.4902 delta=1.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:07:04.57 -28:12:25.6: 12.78 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.64 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:07:04.57 -28:12:25.6: ref_mag=12.64 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=11.6175 delta=1.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:46:59.63 -29:43:42.7: 12.48 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:49:48.50 -22:28:23.0: 13.91 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:49:48.50 -22:28:23.0: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=12.5666 delta=1.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:23:11.38 -28:39:21.2: 13.17 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.29 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:23:11.38 -28:39:21.2: ref_mag=13.29 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=12.2226 delta=1.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:46:59.63 -29:43:42.7: 12.57 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.52 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:46:59.63 -29:43:42.7: ref_mag=12.52 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=11.5851 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:22:27.65 -31:01:34.4: 11.94 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:22:27.65 -31:01:34.4: 12.08 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.00 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:22:27.65 -31:01:34.4: ref_mag=12.00 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=10.9764 delta=1.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:43:28.20 -30:44:19.2: 11.65 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:43:28.20 -30:44:19.2: 11.78 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.71 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:43:28.20 -30:44:19.2: ref_mag=11.71 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=10.7044 delta=1.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:40:33.61 -26:02:01.0: 11.15 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:12:42.51 -31:04:07.2: 10.87 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:12:27.22 -31:00:09.4: 10.65 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:40:33.61 -26:02:01.0: 11.34 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.24 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:40:33.61 -26:02:01.0: ref_mag=11.24 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.3512 delta=0.89 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:12:42.51 -31:04:07.2: 10.93 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.90 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:12:42.51 -31:04:07.2: ref_mag=10.90 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=9.8014 delta=1.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:02:51.58 -30:25:15.5: 10.58 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:12:27.22 -31:00:09.4: 10.73 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.69 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:12:27.22 -31:00:09.4: ref_mag=10.69 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=9.7507 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:02:51.58 -30:25:15.5: 10.64 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.61 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:02:51.58 -30:25:15.5: ref_mag=10.61 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=9.6527 delta=0.96 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 19:48:17.63 -28:21:35.0: 12.96 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_02-49-40_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 20:40:17.17 -30:25:29.1: 10.44 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:48:17.63 -28:21:35.0: 12.81 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.87 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:48:17.63 -28:21:35.0: ref_mag=12.87 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=11.9639 delta=0.91 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-23_01-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 20:40:17.17 -30:25:29.1: 10.48 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.47 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:40:17.17 -30:25:29.1: ref_mag=10.47 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=9.5614 delta=0.90 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53335.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out00581.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out00711.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out00873.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out00891.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out01763.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out02236.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out03128.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out05753.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out06360.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out09989.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out11043.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out12191.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out13363.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out48634.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out56765.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 19s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 9s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56132_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 56132_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56134_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 56134_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56146_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 56146_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56149_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 56149_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56150_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 56150_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56152_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 56152_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56153_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 56153_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56177_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 56177_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:28:02.09 -26:42:49.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56199_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 56199_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56315_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 56315_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56363_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 56363_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:56:50.88 -27:11:33.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56399_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 56399_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56465_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 56465_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:39:55.33 -23:25:42.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56523_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 56523_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:17:57.13 -21:47:41.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56606_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 56606_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56639_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 56639_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56765_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
Preparing report for the candidate 56765_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56783_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 56783_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:47:35.55 -21:49:31.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56815_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 56815_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:03:47.07 -22:34:47.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56854_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 56854_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:46:25.98 -21:31:41.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56856_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 56856_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56860_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 56860_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56889_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 56889_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:43:04.98 -21:00:55.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56998_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 56998_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57000_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 57000_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57011_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 57011_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57030_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 57030_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57036_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 57036_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57081_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 57081_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:03:55.40 -22:26:53.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57094_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 57094_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57116_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 57116_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57161_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 57161_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57181_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 57181_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01763_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
Preparing report for the candidate 01763_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07549_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 07549_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:09:38.90 -29:25:30.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06360_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
Preparing report for the candidate 06360_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17617_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 17617_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:48:40.42 -27:15:15.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09989_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
Preparing report for the candidate 09989_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13191_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 13191_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:47:09.54 -28:08:20.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 48634_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
Preparing report for the candidate 48634_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 45960_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 45960_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:42:31.16 -22:06:13.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20165_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 20165_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:41:33.27 -26:40:20.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13363_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
Preparing report for the candidate 13363_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11043_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
Preparing report for the candidate 11043_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53335_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 53335_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:49:48.50 -22:28:23.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.57, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.55)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.091 6864759238376956160 297.45205752006 -22.47304705456 11.5477 10.1943 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.091#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05753_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
Preparing report for the candidate 05753_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29005_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 29005_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:54:25.81 -25:06:11.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50395_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 50395_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:41:38.22 -27:10:20.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50365_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 50365_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:55:44.89 -22:40:18.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50287_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 50287_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:37:22.52 -30:10:24.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 00711_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
Preparing report for the candidate 00711_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39193_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 39193_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:03:11.04 -22:07:40.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 38990_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 38990_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:44:41.92 -21:58:26.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 00891_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
Preparing report for the candidate 00891_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39878_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 39878_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:03:30.37 -22:16:06.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33718_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 33718_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:53:28.06 -21:33:34.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08796_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 08796_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:46:46.78 -29:00:58.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23353_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 23353_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 00581_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
Preparing report for the candidate 00581_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 00873_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
Preparing report for the candidate 00873_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03128_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
Preparing report for the candidate 03128_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12191_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
Preparing report for the candidate 12191_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02236_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
Preparing report for the candidate 02236_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11923_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 11923_fd_Cap-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-06_00-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
