This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220342_TTUQ1b1x1_1520507_XRTvStxV
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 06.1269 2461258.6269 9.39 18:47:46.52 -23:44:57.4
11.18345 -9.82403 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 7.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.8 Flora 0 -0 0 9.7 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 18:47:46.52 -23:44:57.4: 14.31 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:47:46.52 -23:44:57.4: 14.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461258.6269,9.39,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260806.1269 9.39CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 06.1269 2461258.6269 11.72 18:45:55.38 -28:34:51.8
6.55186 -11.49829 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.3" and 7.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.128 Nemesis 0 -0 1 11.8 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 18:45:55.38 -28:34:51.8: 14.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:45:55.38 -28:34:51.8: 14.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461258.6269,11.72,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260806.1269 11.72CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 06.1269 2461258.6269 12.59 19:20:25.19 -22:45:47.3
15.26643 -16.25625 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 7.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.182 Elsa 1 1 2 12.8 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 19:20:25.19 -22:45:47.3: 14.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:20:25.19 -22:45:47.3: 15.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461258.6269,12.59,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260806.1269 12.59CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 06.1269 2461258.6269 11.23 18:57:25.78 -26:41:51.5
9.38432 -13.04112 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 7.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASAS J185726-2641.9
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.900 V 13.700 V 2455022.00000 83.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 18:57:25.78 -26:41:51.5: 12.19 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:57:25.78 -26:41:51.5: 12.20 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.19 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J185726-2641.9,2461258.6269,11.23,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J185726-2641.9 20260806.1269 11.23CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461147.90695453 17.04.2026 09:45:50.871 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
First image: 2461147.90695453 17.04.2026 09:45:50.871 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
Last image: 2461258.62719191 06.08.2026 03:02:59.381 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220342_TTUQ1b1x1_1520507_XRTvStxV/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 4
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.36
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6989
Objects passed selection criteria: 6987
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 7388.25
Average stars matched: 6209.5 (84.0456 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 234000 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Aug 5 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-189-g49d3cdfd
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-05)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Aug 5 22:09:06 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461147.90695453 17.04.2026 09:45:50.871 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
First image: 2461147.90695453 17.04.2026 09:45:50.871 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
Last image: 2461258.62719191 06.08.2026 03:02:59.381 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220342_TTUQ1b1x1_1520507_XRTvStxV/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 163
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.02
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 36 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 84289
Objects passed selection criteria: 84152
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 79263.2
Average stars matched: 69320 (87.4554 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 480452 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Aug 5 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-189-g49d3cdfd
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-05)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Aug 5 22:10:40 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220342_TTUQ1b1x1_1520507_XRTvStxV/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220342_TTUQ1b1x1_1520507_XRTvStxV/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220342_TTUQ1b1x1_1520507_XRTvStxV/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220342_TTUQ1b1x1_1520507_XRTvStxV/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461258.62666170
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits'
wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits'
wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits'
wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
Image size: 942.3'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:11:51.170 -26:00:19.21 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:11:57.228 -25:58:43.73 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:11:51.170 -26:00:19.21
Second-epoch image center 19:11:57.228 -25:58:43.73
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0349 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:00.364 -25:58:41.70 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:11:51.170 -26:00:19.21
Second-epoch image center 19:12:00.364 -25:58:41.70
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0438 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 19:11:57.228 -25:58:43.73
Second-epoch second image center 19:12:00.364 -25:58:41.70
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01176 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZVnLzpt1Cg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits &> /tmp/tmp.A1ZMW1mA5K
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220342_TTUQ1b1x1_1520507_XRTvStxV/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ox8HLe6bD4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220342_TTUQ1b1x1_1520507_XRTvStxV/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220342_TTUQ1b1x1_1520507_XRTvStxV/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3vtw4GytNd
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220342_TTUQ1b1x1_1520507_XRTvStxV/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6297 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.5158 to 296.7476 deg, Dec -31.5070 to -20.1279 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.5158 to 296.7476 deg, Dec -31.5070 to -20.1279 deg
Loaded 14496 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5080 out of 5188 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5188 out of 6297 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.136550
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.136550
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.36
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 13.78
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 13.78
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6297 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.5158 to 296.7476 deg, Dec -31.5070 to -20.1279 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.5158 to 296.7476 deg, Dec -31.5070 to -20.1279 deg
Loaded 14496 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5080 out of 5188 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5188 out of 6297 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 10687 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.9550 to 297.0903 deg, Dec -31.2648 to -20.5647 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.9550 to 297.0903 deg, Dec -31.2648 to -20.5647 deg
Loaded 13345 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7818 out of 8091 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8091 out of 10687 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
2.3 pix Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
3.4 pix fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
3.4 pix fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
13.8 mag. Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
14.1 mag. Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
13.5 mag. fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
13.5 mag. fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.5 (SNR ) 10.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.ZVnLzpt1Cg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220342_TTUQ1b1x1_1520507_XRTvStxV/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=388, bad_region=0, passed=6297
Got 6297 stars (including 5895 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6297 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013088 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010470 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4918 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4827 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4828 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4827 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6297 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4830 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6297 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4830 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6297 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 4830 stars left (next iteration limit 5309)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits N_match=4830 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.411 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.409 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.477 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.332 n_q1=1422 n_q2=818 n_q3=1496 n_q4=1094 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.161
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.A1ZMW1mA5K (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220342_TTUQ1b1x1_1520507_XRTvStxV/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=726, bad_region=0, passed=10687
Got 10687 stars (including 9950 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10687 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4838 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4838 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4838 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10687 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4835 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10687 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4834 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10687 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Excluding outliers - 4834 stars left (next iteration limit 5321)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits N_match=4834 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.602 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.565 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.637 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.636 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.590 n_q1=1364 n_q2=1000 n_q3=1255 n_q4=1215 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.058
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ox8HLe6bD4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220342_TTUQ1b1x1_1520507_XRTvStxV/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220342_TTUQ1b1x1_1520507_XRTvStxV/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220342_TTUQ1b1x1_1520507_XRTvStxV/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220342_TTUQ1b1x1_1520507_XRTvStxV/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220342_TTUQ1b1x1_1520507_XRTvStxV/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220342_TTUQ1b1x1_1520507_XRTvStxV/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220342_TTUQ1b1x1_1520507_XRTvStxV/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220342_TTUQ1b1x1_1520507_XRTvStxV/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=303, bad_region=0, passed=6365
Got 6365 stars (including 6058 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6365 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4919 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4832 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4833 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4832 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6365 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4918 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4833 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6365 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4833 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6365 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Excluding outliers - 4833 stars left (next iteration limit 5315)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4833 robust_rms=9.241 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.853 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4833 robust_rms=0.497 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.637 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4833 robust_rms=0.401 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.550 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4833 robust_rms_before=0.906 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.522 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.401 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.788 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.550
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:11:57.227 -25:58:44.60 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 6365 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220342_TTUQ1b1x1_1520507_XRTvStxV/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1711186.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.906 -> 0.401 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits N_match=4833 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.407 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.545 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.480 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.306 n_q1=1285 n_q2=861 n_q3=1505 n_q4=1182 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.339
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220342_TTUQ1b1x1_1520507_XRTvStxV/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.3vtw4GytNd (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220342_TTUQ1b1x1_1520507_XRTvStxV/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220342_TTUQ1b1x1_1520507_XRTvStxV/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220342_TTUQ1b1x1_1520507_XRTvStxV/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220342_TTUQ1b1x1_1520507_XRTvStxV/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220342_TTUQ1b1x1_1520507_XRTvStxV/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220342_TTUQ1b1x1_1520507_XRTvStxV/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220342_TTUQ1b1x1_1520507_XRTvStxV/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220342_TTUQ1b1x1_1520507_XRTvStxV/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=296, bad_region=0, passed=6410
Got 6410 stars (including 6110 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6410 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4827 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4828 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4827 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6410 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4918 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4828 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6410 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4828 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6410 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Excluding outliers - 4828 stars left (next iteration limit 5309)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4828 robust_rms=9.149 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.641 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4828 robust_rms=0.462 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.611 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4828 robust_rms=0.397 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.557 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4828 robust_rms_before=0.894 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.519 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.397 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.772 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.557
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:00.370 -25:58:42.56 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 6410 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220342_TTUQ1b1x1_1520507_XRTvStxV/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1710878.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.894 -> 0.397 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits N_match=4828 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.396 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.546 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.484 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.286 n_q1=1267 n_q2=865 n_q3=1513 n_q4=1183 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.379
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220342_TTUQ1b1x1_1520507_XRTvStxV/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits sigma_overall=0.411 worst_q_ratio=1.161
ref2=Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits sigma_overall=0.602 worst_q_ratio=1.058
new1=fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits sigma_overall=0.407 worst_q_ratio=1.339
new2=fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits sigma_overall=0.396 worst_q_ratio=1.379
reference average sigma_overall=0.5065 worst_q_ratio=1.1095
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284_astrometric_residuals.png (4830 matched stars from wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.39 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055_astrometric_residuals.png (4834 matched stars from wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.55 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0008_astrometric_residuals.png (4833 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009_astrometric_residuals.png (4828 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220342_TTUQ1b1x1_1520507_XRTvStxV/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220342_TTUQ1b1x1_1520507_XRTvStxV/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sgr-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 18:47:46.52 -23:44:57.4: 14.31 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 18:40:49.96 -21:03:39.3: 10.68 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:47:46.52 -23:44:57.4: 14.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:40:49.96 -21:03:39.3: 10.88 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.79 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:40:49.96 -21:03:39.3: ref_mag=10.79 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.7910 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out24660.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24659_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 24659_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24660_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
Preparing report for the candidate 24660_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24663_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 24663_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:55:06.23 -22:42:00.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24665_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 24665_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:50:55.37 -25:35:29.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 8s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Sgr-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
18:47:46.52 -23:44:57.4
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220342_TTUQ1b1x1_1520507_XRTvStxV/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220342_TTUQ1b1x1_1520507_XRTvStxV/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220342_TTUQ1b1x1_1520507_XRTvStxV/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220342_TTUQ1b1x1_1520507_XRTvStxV/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
Image size: 942.3'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:11:51.170 -26:00:19.21 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:11:57.228 -25:58:43.73 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:11:51.170 -26:00:19.21
Second-epoch image center 19:11:57.228 -25:58:43.73
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0349 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:00.364 -25:58:41.70 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:11:51.170 -26:00:19.21
Second-epoch image center 19:12:00.364 -25:58:41.70
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0438 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 19:11:57.228 -25:58:43.73
Second-epoch second image center 19:12:00.364 -25:58:41.70
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01176 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pacRHByEe9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WH5TLVV7ya
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220342_TTUQ1b1x1_1520507_XRTvStxV/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits &> /tmp/tmp.AGSBQPE9vW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220342_TTUQ1b1x1_1520507_XRTvStxV/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220342_TTUQ1b1x1_1520507_XRTvStxV/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zi665zvi2D
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220342_TTUQ1b1x1_1520507_XRTvStxV/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 84103 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.4864 to 296.7493 deg, Dec -31.5437 to -20.0386 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.4864 to 296.7493 deg, Dec -31.5437 to -20.0386 deg
Loaded 14698 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10647 out of 11707 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11707 out of 84103 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 21.872800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=21.872800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.02
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 13.85
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 13.85
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 84103 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.4864 to 296.7493 deg, Dec -31.5437 to -20.0386 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.4864 to 296.7493 deg, Dec -31.5437 to -20.0386 deg
Loaded 14698 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10647 out of 11707 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11707 out of 84103 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits (aperture=4.4)
Read 118893 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.9116 to 297.0918 deg, Dec -31.2648 to -20.5524 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.9116 to 297.0918 deg, Dec -31.2648 to -20.5524 deg
Loaded 13402 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10008 out of 11606 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11606 out of 118893 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 121 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
2.1 pix Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
3.0 pix fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
3.0 pix fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
13.9 mag. Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
14.3 mag. Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
13.6 mag. fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
13.6 mag. fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.6 (SNR ) 13.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.pacRHByEe9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220342_TTUQ1b1x1_1520507_XRTvStxV/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=4218, bad_region=1, passed=84096
Got 84096 stars (including 79714 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 84096 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013088 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010470 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4829 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4830 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4829 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 84096 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4828 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 84096 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4828 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 84096 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 4828 stars left (next iteration limit 5311)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits N_match=4828 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.470 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.342 n_q1=1423 n_q2=879 n_q3=1397 n_q4=1129 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.165
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.WH5TLVV7ya (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220342_TTUQ1b1x1_1520507_XRTvStxV/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=8799, bad_region=0, passed=118877
Got 118877 stars (including 109929 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 118877 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4838 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4838 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4838 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 118877 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4837 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 118877 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4836 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 118877 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Excluding outliers - 4836 stars left (next iteration limit 5321)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits N_match=4836 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.594 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.545 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.666 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.619 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.599 n_q1=1388 n_q2=1022 n_q3=1175 n_q4=1251 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.120
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.AGSBQPE9vW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220342_TTUQ1b1x1_1520507_XRTvStxV/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220342_TTUQ1b1x1_1520507_XRTvStxV/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220342_TTUQ1b1x1_1520507_XRTvStxV/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220342_TTUQ1b1x1_1520507_XRTvStxV/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220342_TTUQ1b1x1_1520507_XRTvStxV/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220342_TTUQ1b1x1_1520507_XRTvStxV/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220342_TTUQ1b1x1_1520507_XRTvStxV/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220342_TTUQ1b1x1_1520507_XRTvStxV/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=2906, bad_region=1, passed=58139
Got 58139 stars (including 55149 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 58139 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4824 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4825 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4824 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58139 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4825 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58139 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4825 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58139 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 4825 stars left (next iteration limit 5306)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits N_match=4825 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.506 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.681 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.495 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.511 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.372 n_q1=1198 n_q2=839 n_q3=1542 n_q4=1246 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.344
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220342_TTUQ1b1x1_1520507_XRTvStxV/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.zi665zvi2D (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220342_TTUQ1b1x1_1520507_XRTvStxV/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220342_TTUQ1b1x1_1520507_XRTvStxV/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220342_TTUQ1b1x1_1520507_XRTvStxV/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220342_TTUQ1b1x1_1520507_XRTvStxV/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220342_TTUQ1b1x1_1520507_XRTvStxV/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220342_TTUQ1b1x1_1520507_XRTvStxV/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220342_TTUQ1b1x1_1520507_XRTvStxV/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220342_TTUQ1b1x1_1520507_XRTvStxV/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=2855, bad_region=2, passed=58421
Got 58421 stars (including 55481 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 58421 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4910 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4828 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4829 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4828 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58421 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4830 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58421 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4830 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58421 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Excluding outliers - 4830 stars left (next iteration limit 5310)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits N_match=4830 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.508 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.707 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.504 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.496 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.372 n_q1=1191 n_q2=836 n_q3=1547 n_q4=1256 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.391
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220342_TTUQ1b1x1_1520507_XRTvStxV/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220342_TTUQ1b1x1_1520507_XRTvStxV/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_220342_TTUQ1b1x1_1520507_XRTvStxV/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sgr-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 19:00:58.93 -22:21:43.8: 13.17 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 18:40:37.43 -23:56:38.1: 13.07 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 19:40:50.55 -29:54:51.0: 12.58 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 18:58:40.30 -24:08:46.5: 12.57 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 18:50:06.94 -21:11:42.2: 12.75 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 18:54:58.09 -20:45:41.7: 13.10 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 18:44:40.61 -20:26:53.7: 12.66 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:44:40.61 -20:26:53.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:44:40.61 -20:26:53.7: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 18:36:02.52 -28:46:58.0: 12.02 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 19:06:24.80 -23:14:52.2: 12.51 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:36:02.52 -28:46:58.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:36:02.52 -28:46:58.0: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:58:40.30 -24:08:46.5: 12.62 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:00:58.93 -22:21:43.8: 13.45 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:50:06.94 -21:11:42.2: 12.95 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:40:50.55 -29:54:51.0: 12.47 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:40:37.43 -23:56:38.1: 13.38 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:54:58.09 -20:45:41.7: 13.22 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.60 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.87 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.24 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.49 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:50:06.94 -21:11:42.2: ref_mag=12.87 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.7687 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:58:40.30 -24:08:46.5: ref_mag=12.60 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.7850 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:00:58.93 -22:21:43.8: ref_mag=13.33 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.3287 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:40:37.43 -23:56:38.1: ref_mag=13.24 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=12.7085 delta=0.53 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.18 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:40:50.55 -29:54:51.0: ref_mag=12.49 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.5904 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:54:58.09 -20:45:41.7: ref_mag=13.18 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.1029 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:06:24.80 -23:14:52.2: 12.50 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.50 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:06:24.80 -23:14:52.2: ref_mag=12.50 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.5008 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 18:55:51.09 -24:46:58.3: 11.04 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 19:07:40.55 -28:20:06.3: 9.93 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 18:45:55.38 -28:34:51.8: 14.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:55:51.09 -24:46:58.3: 11.13 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.10 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:55:51.09 -24:46:58.3: ref_mag=11.10 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.2299 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:07:40.55 -28:20:06.3: 9.89 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.90 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:07:40.55 -28:20:06.3: ref_mag=9.90 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.9893 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:45:55.38 -28:34:51.8: 14.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 19:20:25.19 -22:45:47.3: 14.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 18:35:55.29 -29:55:39.7: 13.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 18:50:16.19 -20:37:42.3: 13.42 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:35:55.29 -29:55:39.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:35:55.29 -29:55:39.7: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:50:16.19 -20:37:42.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:50:16.19 -20:37:42.3: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 18:46:04.47 -20:22:20.4: 12.65 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 18:58:46.21 -20:39:57.9: 12.63 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:20:25.19 -22:45:47.3: 15.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 18:52:20.80 -20:54:19.8: 12.37 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:46:04.47 -20:22:20.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:46:04.47 -20:22:20.4: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:58:46.21 -20:39:57.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:58:46.21 -20:39:57.9: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 18:58:16.45 -23:40:11.6: 14.11 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:52:20.80 -20:54:19.8: 12.75 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.58 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:52:20.80 -20:54:19.8: ref_mag=12.58 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.8596 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 18:39:49.21 -24:04:16.9: 13.14 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 18:51:34.98 -20:36:23.5: 13.05 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 18:42:01.66 -21:00:25.7: 13.45 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:51:34.98 -20:36:23.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:51:34.98 -20:36:23.5: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:58:16.45 -23:40:11.6: 14.38 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.27 +/- 0.20
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:58:16.45 -23:40:11.6: ref_mag=14.27 +/- 0.20 new_mean_mag=12.9161 delta=1.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 18:50:23.47 -20:38:56.8: 13.25 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:50:23.47 -20:38:56.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:50:23.47 -20:38:56.8: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:39:49.21 -24:04:16.9: 13.34 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.26 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:39:49.21 -24:04:16.9: ref_mag=13.26 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=12.8897 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:42:01.66 -21:00:25.7: 14.01 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.68 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:42:01.66 -21:00:25.7: ref_mag=13.68 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.0135 delta=0.67 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 18:49:03.28 -20:39:51.2: 13.84 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 18:41:15.33 -23:20:37.4: 13.25 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 18:58:43.43 -20:42:09.8: 13.64 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 18:59:49.04 -25:03:32.9: 13.05 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:58:43.43 -20:42:09.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:58:43.43 -20:42:09.8: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 18:43:49.70 -20:34:34.7: 13.41 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:49:03.28 -20:39:51.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:49:03.28 -20:39:51.2: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 18:42:15.83 -22:17:33.0: 13.30 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:43:49.70 -20:34:34.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:43:49.70 -20:34:34.7: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:41:15.33 -23:20:37.4: 13.56 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.41 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:41:15.33 -23:20:37.4: ref_mag=13.41 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=12.9875 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:59:49.04 -25:03:32.9: 13.08 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.07 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:59:49.04 -25:03:32.9: ref_mag=13.07 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=12.9240 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:42:15.83 -22:17:33.0: 13.57 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:42:15.83 -22:17:33.0: ref_mag=13.46 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=12.9721 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 18:47:07.06 -21:25:12.2: 13.46 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 18:57:34.20 -20:43:06.5: 13.44 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 19:04:32.23 -21:29:04.9: 12.89 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 18:43:27.94 -20:19:25.9: 13.22 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:47:07.06 -21:25:12.2: 13.83 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 18:58:57.07 -20:38:42.7: 13.41 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.65 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:47:07.06 -21:25:12.2: ref_mag=13.65 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.0542 delta=0.59 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:43:27.94 -20:19:25.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:43:27.94 -20:19:25.9: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:57:34.20 -20:43:06.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:57:34.20 -20:43:06.5: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 18:56:48.71 -26:20:32.1: 14.48 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:58:57.07 -20:38:42.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:58:57.07 -20:38:42.7: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:04:32.23 -21:29:04.9: 13.08 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.00 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:04:32.23 -21:29:04.9: ref_mag=13.00 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.0809 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 18:47:55.93 -20:38:27.2: 13.57 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:47:55.93 -20:38:27.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:47:55.93 -20:38:27.2: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:56:48.71 -26:20:32.1: 14.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 18:44:12.67 -20:25:38.8: 13.40 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 18:42:16.78 -25:26:45.3: 13.45 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 18:44:02.96 -20:25:48.3: 13.71 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 18:42:18.53 -20:24:26.3: 13.30 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 18:46:01.83 -21:10:08.2: 13.50 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:44:12.67 -20:25:38.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:44:12.67 -20:25:38.8: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:44:02.96 -20:25:48.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:44:02.96 -20:25:48.3: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:42:18.53 -20:24:26.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:42:18.53 -20:24:26.3: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 18:53:53.57 -20:49:46.4: 13.60 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:42:16.78 -25:26:45.3: 13.87 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:42:16.78 -25:26:45.3: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.1352 delta=0.53 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:46:01.83 -21:10:08.2: 13.71 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.62 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:46:01.83 -21:10:08.2: ref_mag=13.62 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.1983 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:53:53.57 -20:49:46.4: 13.68 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.65 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:53:53.57 -20:49:46.4: ref_mag=13.65 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.3272 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 18:54:47.73 -28:49:01.3: 13.36 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 18:52:53.65 -20:36:41.6: 13.41 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:52:53.65 -20:36:41.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:52:53.65 -20:36:41.6: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 18:40:39.73 -20:59:27.4: 13.47 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 18:47:19.82 -20:33:41.7: 13.45 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 18:45:22.11 -20:36:25.7: 13.50 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:47:19.82 -20:33:41.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:47:19.82 -20:33:41.7: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:45:22.11 -20:36:25.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:45:22.11 -20:36:25.7: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:54:47.73 -28:49:01.3: 13.66 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.53 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:54:47.73 -28:49:01.3: ref_mag=13.53 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.0276 delta=0.51 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 18:48:40.40 -20:31:53.9: 13.64 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:48:40.40 -20:31:53.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:48:40.40 -20:31:53.9: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:40:39.73 -20:59:27.4: 14.05 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.73 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:40:39.73 -20:59:27.4: ref_mag=13.73 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.1634 delta=0.57 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 18:56:45.35 -20:35:47.0: 13.93 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:56:45.35 -20:35:47.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:56:45.35 -20:35:47.0: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 18:47:53.91 -20:30:49.1: 13.47 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:47:53.91 -20:30:49.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:47:53.91 -20:30:49.1: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 18:44:41.61 -25:44:17.0: 14.24 +/- 0.34 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 19:45:38.21 -30:33:06.7: 12.54 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:44:41.61 -25:44:17.0: 14.04 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.09 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:44:41.61 -25:44:17.0: ref_mag=14.09 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=13.2068 delta=0.88 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:45:38.21 -30:33:06.7: 12.53 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.53 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:45:38.21 -30:33:06.7: ref_mag=12.53 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.1662 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 18:57:25.78 -26:41:51.5: 12.19 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:57:25.78 -26:41:51.5: 12.20 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.19 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:57:25.78 -26:41:51.5: ref_mag=12.19 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.2312 delta=0.96 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out133306.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out133374.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out133247.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out133272.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out29769.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133145_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133145_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133161_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133161_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133176_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133176_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133177_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133177_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:46:09.25 -21:04:48.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133179_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133179_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133182_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133182_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133185_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133185_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:47:31.12 -23:06:06.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133187_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133187_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133190_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133190_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133191_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133191_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133194_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133194_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133199_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133199_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133200_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133200_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:41:16.12 -21:10:05.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133203_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133203_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:49:04.43 -20:35:16.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133207_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133207_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:58:16.82 -23:01:17.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133215_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133215_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133216_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133216_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133217_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133217_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:47:46.46 -23:44:56.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133220_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133220_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:55:06.17 -22:42:03.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133223_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133223_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:18.12 -23:18:00.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133238_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133238_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:46:27.80 -22:23:20.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133240_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133240_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:44:57.63 -27:38:29.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133243_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133243_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:58:36.72 -20:39:41.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133247_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
Preparing report for the candidate 133247_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133248_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133248_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:51:43.45 -29:00:35.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133252_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133252_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:59.13 -22:22:26.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133255_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133255_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:09:09.26 -23:24:38.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133257_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133257_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:21:22.67 -29:30:51.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133262_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133262_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:04:46.88 -22:16:52.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133266_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133266_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:40:14.07 -22:40:01.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133271_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133271_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:44:08.76 -29:11:57.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133272_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
Preparing report for the candidate 133272_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133275_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133275_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:52:35.60 -22:19:00.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133276_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133276_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133278_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133278_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:46:15.80 -22:24:30.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133279_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133279_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133283_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133283_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:57:29.25 -25:41:02.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133284_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133284_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:51:17.77 -25:10:59.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133285_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133285_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:44:01.43 -30:01:40.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133293_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133293_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133295_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133295_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:45:59.30 -20:35:43.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133296_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133296_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133298_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133298_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:41:23.38 -21:19:37.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133300_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133300_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133304_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133304_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:25:29.80 -24:20:12.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133305_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133305_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:41:03.22 -28:09:35.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133306_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133306_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:58:16.45 -23:40:11.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.93, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.91)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.299 4075355069716123648 284.56861068087 -23.66994286726 12.2630 10.7743 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.299#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133307_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133307_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133311_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133311_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:41:42.38 -20:32:07.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133312_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133312_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133313_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133313_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133314_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133314_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133315_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133315_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:02:06.49 -26:53:35.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133316_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133316_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:02:53.18 -25:12:05.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133318_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133318_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:50:24.76 -24:41:31.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133319_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133319_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133322_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133322_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:39:40.89 -24:55:02.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133323_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133323_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133325_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133325_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133327_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133327_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133335_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133335_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133337_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133337_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133338_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133338_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:03:36.37 -27:11:55.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133341_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133341_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:39:34.39 -25:37:40.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133345_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133345_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133347_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133347_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:45:18.26 -24:55:29.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133349_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133349_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133353_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133353_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:17:35.54 -21:36:55.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133357_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133357_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133368_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133368_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:15:52.02 -22:16:27.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133369_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133369_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133371_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133371_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133374_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133374_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:56:48.71 -26:20:32.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.06, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.04)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.183 4073621762670574976 284.20331082720 -26.34215932248 13.8572 12.0024 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.183#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133376_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133376_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:47:28.32 -24:15:23.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133379_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133379_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133385_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133385_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:55:20.73 -30:31:12.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133386_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133386_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133388_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133388_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133393_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133393_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133395_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133395_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133398_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133398_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133399_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133399_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:45:50.45 -23:11:41.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133401_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133401_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133405_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133405_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:26.37 -22:15:23.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133406_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133406_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133410_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133410_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:44:14.74 -28:33:07.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133416_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133416_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133423_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133423_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133426_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133426_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133431_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133431_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133446_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133446_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:46:01.61 -24:17:33.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133447_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133447_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133450_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133450_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133460_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133460_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:43:42.07 -20:44:56.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133464_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133464_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:43:03.84 -26:26:55.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133470_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133470_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133487_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133487_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95610_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 95610_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:50:36.09 -28:26:09.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96328_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 96328_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97175_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 97175_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:57.85 -28:06:24.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97737_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 97737_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:47:33.60 -24:07:19.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11925_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 11925_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:26.37 -28:41:55.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75796_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 75796_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:15:58.74 -23:12:19.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114965_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 114965_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:39:37.42 -25:02:16.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29769_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
Preparing report for the candidate 29769_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112071_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 112071_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:01:35.79 -27:18:04.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111198_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 111198_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:44:27.39 -24:05:44.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36152_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 36152_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:41:10.77 -25:29:14.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109929_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 109929_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:41:37.80 -27:10:21.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26719_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 26719_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:54:26.55 -27:02:45.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102277_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 102277_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:13:49.88 -22:29:06.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98946_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 98946_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:42:01.37 -23:10:37.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98781_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 98781_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:52:11.32 -27:20:12.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97888_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 97888_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:18:59.41 -23:54:31.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97872_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 97872_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:41:14.32 -24:02:02.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97315_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 97315_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:10:50.47 -23:55:19.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96991_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 96991_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:50:55.24 -25:35:29.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96372_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 96372_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:54:20.89 -26:02:20.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96309_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 96309_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:39:20.47 -27:49:41.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95933_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 95933_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:50:34.27 -23:36:09.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95189_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 95189_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_22-02-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks