FITS images used in this processing run:

Field UMa-02-Q1b1x1 reference image: UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
Field UMa-02-Q1b1x1 reference image: UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
Field UMa-02-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-01-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
Field UMa-02-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits

## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461082.80383981 11.02.2026 07:17:21.760   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
First image: 2461082.80383981 11.02.2026 07:17:21.760   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
Last  image: 2461257.91819487 05.08.2026 10:02:02.037   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 1
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.53
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  10.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     55000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.37            # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  9054
Objects passed selection criteria:  9005
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    2.6    2.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    2.6    2.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 6257.5
Average stars matched: 6105.5 (97.5709 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   240848 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Tue Aug  4 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-188-g9fc0b030
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-04)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Wed Aug  5 05:10:39 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461082.80383981 11.02.2026 07:17:21.760   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
First image: 2461082.80383981 11.02.2026 07:17:21.760   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
Last  image: 2461257.91819487 05.08.2026 10:02:02.037   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 55
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.26
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 10 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  2.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     57000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.83            # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  52619
Objects passed selection criteria:  52464
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    2.7    2.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    2.7    2.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 38210.2
Average stars matched: 37021.8 (96.8896 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   274060 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Tue Aug  4 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-188-g9fc0b030
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-04)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Wed Aug  5 05:11:23 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
UMa-02-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting UMa-02-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing UMa-02-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 287572 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 287572 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 

Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:

MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes


renamed 'UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-01-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-01-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits_preview.png'

UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-01-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits


renamed 'UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits_preview.png'

UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits




Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 521.0909
INFO:         REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 558.9001
INFO:    SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2532.2936
INFO:            SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 603.7914
INFO:   SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2528.2518
INFO:           SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 603.6356
----------------------------------------------
INFO:      ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 4.8596
INFO:                  SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.000
INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-01-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits 
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-01-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-01-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
Header: 67 keys total, 4 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-05T05:01:09.5835463' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-05T10:01:09.5835463' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61257.4174720254 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-05T10:01:19.4855825' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61257.4175866321 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     128.568763246488 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =     61.9995388222184 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     14.8294444444444 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     22.9791666666667 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     3.85206658435252 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =     33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=    -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'UMa-02'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '08 34 17'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+62 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                29526 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                29526 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 56: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 57: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 58: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 59: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 60: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 61: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 62: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 63: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 64: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-01-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-01-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-01-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/d_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-01-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits :)

Spent 0.485173 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/d_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-01-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 26658.571233
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-01-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=17308.5, right_median=19900.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-01-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits 
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits
Header: 67 keys total, 4 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-05T05:02:02.0377055' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-05T10:02:02.0377055' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61257.4180791317 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-05T10:02:11.9414802' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61257.4181937617 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     128.568763211917 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =      61.999538872681 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =                 14.9 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     23.0561111111111 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     3.83477580452346 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =     33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=    -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'UMa-02'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '08 34 17'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+62 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                29526 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                29526 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 56: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 57: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 58: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 59: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 60: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 61: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 62: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 63: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 64: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/d_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits :)

Spent 0.495987 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/d_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 26658.571233
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=17308.5, right_median=19900.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-01-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:


fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-01-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits



fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits




Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1

  ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-01-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-01-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461257.91758777
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits'
wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits'
wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-01-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-01-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-01-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-01-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits'
wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.2'  15.7(deg)x10.5(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:34:18.663 +61:59:38.81 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-01-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-01-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
Image size: 944.2'x627.2'  15.7(deg)x10.5(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:34:00.731 +62:00:55.30 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 08:34:18.663 +61:59:38.81
Second-epoch image center 08:34:00.731 +62:00:55.30
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0410 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits
Image size: 944.2'x627.2'  15.7(deg)x10.5(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:33:58.013 +62:00:33.28 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 08:34:18.663 +61:59:38.81
Second-epoch image center 08:33:58.013 +62:00:33.28
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0431 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  08:34:00.731 +62:00:55.30
Second-epoch second image center 08:33:58.013 +62:00:33.28
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00810 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3wBFSUbRSG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits &> /tmp/tmp.oIM84hHefi
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-01-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits &> /tmp/tmp.v8n3YPno1A
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-01-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits &> /tmp/tmp.QZZfz4BMjf
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits and wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits and wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat 
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits and wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 9619 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 109.7385 to 148.5418 deg, Dec +55.4555 to +67.4100 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 109.7385 to 148.5418 deg, Dec 55.4555 to 67.4100 deg
Loaded 8849 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5401 out of 5701 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5701 out of 9619 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.868000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.868000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.53
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.34

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.34

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 9619 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 109.7385 to 148.5418 deg, Dec +55.4555 to +67.4100 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 109.7385 to 148.5418 deg, Dec 55.4555 to 67.4100 deg
Loaded 8849 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5401 out of 5701 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5701 out of 9619 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 9596 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 109.7385 to 148.5413 deg, Dec +55.4555 to +67.4099 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 109.7385 to 148.5413 deg, Dec 55.4555 to 67.4099 deg
Loaded 8848 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5383 out of 5695 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5695 out of 9596 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.2 pix  UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
 2.2 pix  UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
 2.3 pix  fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-01-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
 2.3 pix  fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.3 mag.  UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
 15.3 mag.  UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
 13.6 mag.  fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-01-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
 13.6 mag.  fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  13.6 (SNR )  10.9 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.3wBFSUbRSG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=686, bad_region=0, passed=9619
Got 9619 stars (including 8917 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9619 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 789 (Dec 55.5 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4904 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4898 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9619 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 789 (Dec 55.5 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4904 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9619 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9619 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Excluding outliers - 4896 stars left (next iteration limit 5385)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits N_match=4896 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.507 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.291 n_q1=1045 n_q2=1423 n_q3=1046 n_q4=1382 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.433
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits -region wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.oIM84hHefi (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=696, bad_region=0, passed=9596
Got 9596 stars (including 8884 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9596 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 789 (Dec 55.5 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4907 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4902 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9596 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 789 (Dec 55.5 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4907 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9596 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9596 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Excluding outliers - 4901 stars left (next iteration limit 5391)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits N_match=4901 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.506 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.299 n_q1=1037 n_q2=1434 n_q3=1042 n_q4=1388 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.387
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits -region wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.v8n3YPno1A (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-01-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-01-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-01-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-01-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-01-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-01-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-01-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-01-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-01-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-01-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-01-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-01-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-01-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-01-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-01-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=193, bad_region=0, passed=2996
Got 2996 stars (including 2799 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-01-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2996 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013114 (47.2 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010491 (37.8 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 56.0 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2738 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2736 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2734 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2736 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2994 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 56.0 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2736 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2736 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2995 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2736 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2995 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" 
Excluding outliers - 2736 stars left (next iteration limit 3009)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2736 robust_rms=7.051 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=20.591 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2736 robust_rms=0.586 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.761 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2736 robust_rms=0.483 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.692 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2736 robust_rms_before=1.511 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.437 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.483 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.607 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.692
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.607 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-01-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits N_match=2736 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.452 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.421 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.637 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.551 n_q1=853 n_q2=402 n_q3=898 n_q4=583 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.409
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-01-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-01-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-01-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-01-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-01-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.QZZfz4BMjf (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=190, bad_region=0, passed=2971
Got 2971 stars (including 2781 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2971 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013114 (47.2 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010491 (37.8 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 56.0 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2720 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2718 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2716 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2718 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2969 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 56.0 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2718 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2718 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2969 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2718 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2969 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" 
Excluding outliers - 2718 stars left (next iteration limit 2989)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2718 robust_rms=6.566 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=20.523 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2718 robust_rms=0.609 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.741 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2718 robust_rms=0.476 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.636 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2718 robust_rms_before=1.442 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.431 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.476 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.582 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.636
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.582 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits N_match=2718 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.443 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.424 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.612 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.496 n_q1=847 n_q2=387 n_q3=898 n_q4=586 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.382
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits sigma_overall=0.353 worst_q_ratio=1.433
ref2=UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits sigma_overall=0.365 worst_q_ratio=1.387
new1=fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-01-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits sigma_overall=0.452 worst_q_ratio=1.409
new2=fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits sigma_overall=0.443 worst_q_ratio=1.382
reference average sigma_overall=0.359 worst_q_ratio=1.41
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################

Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302_astrometric_residuals.png (4896 matched stars from wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303_astrometric_residuals.png (4901 matched stars from wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-01-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452_astrometric_residuals.png (2736 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-01-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.39 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453_astrometric_residuals.png (2718 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.39 arcsec)


Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-01-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-01-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-01-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09362_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 09362_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 08 05.41819    2461257.91819    9.49    07:55:50.93 +57:11:55.3   1820 0340   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits

**** FOUND  07:55:50.94 +57:11:55.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL

  ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-01-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-01-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-01-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-01-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.2'  15.7(deg)x10.5(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:34:18.663 +61:59:38.81 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-01-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-01-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
Image size: 944.2'x627.2'  15.7(deg)x10.5(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:34:00.731 +62:00:55.30 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 08:34:18.663 +61:59:38.81
Second-epoch image center 08:34:00.731 +62:00:55.30
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0410 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits
Image size: 944.2'x627.2'  15.7(deg)x10.5(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:33:58.013 +62:00:33.28 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 08:34:18.663 +61:59:38.81
Second-epoch image center 08:33:58.013 +62:00:33.28
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0431 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  08:34:00.731 +62:00:55.30
Second-epoch second image center 08:33:58.013 +62:00:33.28
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00810 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Zhw5lzmJaP
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KmsRYm7bf0
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-01-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FhHswA661o
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-01-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Pkm9SIX1sa
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits and wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits and wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat 
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits and wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 56661 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 109.7385 to 148.5794 deg, Dec +55.3287 to +67.4112 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 109.7385 to 148.5794 deg, Dec 55.3287 to 67.4112 deg
Loaded 8955 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5034 out of 5776 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5776 out of 56661 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.754100
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.754100
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.26
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.49

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.49

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 56661 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 109.7385 to 148.5794 deg, Dec +55.3287 to +67.4112 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 109.7385 to 148.5794 deg, Dec 55.3287 to 67.4112 deg
Loaded 8955 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5034 out of 5776 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5776 out of 56661 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits (aperture=4.8)
Read 56645 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 109.7385 to 148.5789 deg, Dec +55.3459 to +67.4186 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 109.7385 to 148.5789 deg, Dec 55.3459 to 67.4186 deg
Loaded 8948 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5045 out of 5770 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5770 out of 56645 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits (aperture=4.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 50 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.0 pix  UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
 2.0 pix  UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
 2.2 pix  fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-01-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
 2.2 pix  fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.5 mag.  UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
 15.5 mag.  UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
 13.7 mag.  fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-01-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
 13.7 mag.  fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  13.7 (SNR )  13.3 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.Zhw5lzmJaP (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=2986, bad_region=5, passed=56640
Got 56640 stars (including 53549 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 56640 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4898 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4892 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56640 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4898 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56640 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56640 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Excluding outliers - 4892 stars left (next iteration limit 5381)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits N_match=4892 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.486 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.281 n_q1=1040 n_q2=1417 n_q3=1035 n_q4=1400 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.408
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits -region wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.KmsRYm7bf0 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=2922, bad_region=5, passed=56624
Got 56624 stars (including 53603 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 56624 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4901 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4894 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56624 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4901 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56624 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56624 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Excluding outliers - 4894 stars left (next iteration limit 5383)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits N_match=4894 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.472 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.299 n_q1=1040 n_q2=1423 n_q3=1040 n_q4=1391 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.345
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits -region wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.FhHswA661o (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-01-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-01-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-01-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-01-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-01-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-01-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-01-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-01-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-01-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-01-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-01-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-01-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-01-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-01-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-01-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=483, bad_region=10, passed=20207
Got 20207 stars (including 19681 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-01-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 20207 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013114 (47.2 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010491 (37.8 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4897 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4889 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20206 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4895 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20206 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20206 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" 
Excluding outliers - 4889 stars left (next iteration limit 5377)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-01-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-01-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits N_match=4889 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.445 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.424 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.592 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.516 n_q1=1489 n_q2=741 n_q3=1666 n_q4=993 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.331
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-01-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-01-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-01-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-01-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-01-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Pkm9SIX1sa (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=554, bad_region=11, passed=20411
Got 20411 stars (including 19824 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 20411 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013114 (47.2 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010491 (37.8 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4896 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4886 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20410 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4894 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20410 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20410 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" 
Excluding outliers - 4886 stars left (next iteration limit 5374)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits N_match=4886 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.438 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.447 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.588 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.485 n_q1=1487 n_q2=742 n_q3=1672 n_q4=985 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.342
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-01-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-01-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 07:31:39.33 +62:01:13.1:  12.53 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 07:51:40.11 +61:16:42.6:  13.04 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 08:09:30.76 +65:41:19.5:  12.75 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 07:28:45.38 +63:53:52.3:  13.19 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits at 07:51:40.11 +61:16:42.6:  13.10 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits at 07:31:39.33 +62:01:13.1:  12.57 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.07 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.55 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:51:40.11 +61:16:42.6: ref_mag=13.07 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0217 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:31:39.33 +62:01:13.1: ref_mag=12.55 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6793 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits at 08:09:30.76 +65:41:19.5:  12.77 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.76 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:09:30.76 +65:41:19.5: ref_mag=12.76 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6886 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits at 07:28:45.38 +63:53:52.3:  13.18 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.19 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:28:45.38 +63:53:52.3: ref_mag=13.19 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0639 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 08:23:24.22 +61:28:27.4:  13.66 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits at 08:23:24.22 +61:28:27.4:  13.62 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.64 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:23:24.22 +61:28:27.4: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3885 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70716_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 70716_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 05.41759    2461257.91759    13.05    07:51:40.29 +61:16:42.8   1749 2829   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-01-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.41819    2461257.91819    13.00    07:51:39.94 +61:16:42.4   1752 2833   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70717_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 70717_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 05.41759    2461257.91759    12.67    07:31:39.27 +62:01:13.3   0379 3483   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-01-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.41819    2461257.91819    12.68    07:31:39.40 +62:01:12.9   0382 3486   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70718_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 70718_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.41819    2461257.91819    12.30    08:05:58.20 +58:12:49.4   2686 0903   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits

**** FOUND  08:05:58.18 +58:12:49.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70720_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 70720_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.41819    2461257.91819    11.06    07:37:15.16 +61:49:43.1   0760 3302   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits

**** FOUND  07:37:15.21 +61:49:42.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70756_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 70756_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.41819    2461257.91819    10.86    08:08:56.73 +64:19:44.3   3083 4578   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70761_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 70761_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.41819    2461257.91819    10.84    08:18:47.86 +63:53:17.2   3725 4297   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70790_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 70790_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.41819    2461257.91819    11.26    08:30:06.41 +60:40:33.7   4548 2381   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits

**** FOUND  08:30:06.39 +60:40:34.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70835_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 70835_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.41819    2461257.91819    11.79    09:10:57.40 +63:32:53.5   7200 4438   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits

**** FOUND  09:10:57.38 +63:32:54.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70851_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 70851_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.41819    2461257.91819    11.91    08:26:29.30 +58:50:25.3   4308 1267   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70855_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 70855_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.41819    2461257.91819    11.82    08:19:56.68 +65:01:33.4   3801 4983   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70866_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 70866_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.41819    2461257.91819    12.39    07:26:12.37 +64:02:10.2   0250 4763   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70877_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 70877_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.41819    2461257.91819    12.09    08:34:05.89 +61:17:52.2   4821 2769   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70913_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 70913_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.41819    2461257.91819    12.71    08:44:45.82 +65:37:34.4   5342 5422   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70939_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 70939_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.41819    2461257.91819    12.90    07:31:59.50 +65:18:00.9   0774 5442   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70940_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 70940_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 05.41759    2461257.91759    12.68    08:09:30.72 +65:41:18.9   3150 5394   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-01-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.41819    2461257.91819    12.70    08:09:30.79 +65:41:20.1   3153 5398   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70961_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 70961_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.41819    2461257.91819    12.87    08:09:48.17 +65:39:10.9   3170 5375   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits

**** FOUND  08:09:48.13 +65:39:11.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70966_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 70966_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.41819    2461257.91819    12.74    08:34:47.35 +65:07:02.4   4741 5066   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits

**** FOUND  08:34:47.34 +65:07:01.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70967_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 70967_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.41819    2461257.91819    12.82    07:28:21.84 +63:36:30.8   0341 4478   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70971_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 70971_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.41819    2461257.91819    12.64    08:35:12.95 +66:16:45.5   4727 5769   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits

**** FOUND  08:35:12.85 +66:16:46.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70972_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 70972_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.41819    2461257.91819    12.57    08:39:05.15 +59:57:55.3   5238 1994   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits

**** FOUND  08:39:05.08 +59:57:55.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70976_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 70976_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 05.41759    2461257.91759    13.02    07:28:45.32 +63:53:52.5   0399 4642   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-01-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.41819    2461257.91819    13.12    07:28:45.43 +63:53:52.2   0402 4645   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70991_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 70991_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.41819    2461257.91819    12.90    07:43:30.14 +58:06:28.2   0884 0997   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71010_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 71010_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.41819    2461257.91819    12.81    07:43:53.76 +59:49:12.0   1063 2025   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71011_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 71011_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.41819    2461257.91819    12.86    08:38:55.37 +64:51:01.7   5014 4923   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71012_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 71012_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.41819    2461257.91819    12.97    07:26:34.69 +63:12:28.0   0171 4264   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71020_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 71020_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.41819    2461257.91819    13.22    08:14:06.03 +66:40:46.2   3451 5989   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71033_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 71033_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.41819    2461257.91819    12.66    07:57:37.14 +58:18:45.7   2026 1004   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71036_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 71036_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.41819    2461257.91819    13.15    07:46:55.64 +61:10:53.7   1400 2814   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71037_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 71037_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.41819    2461257.91819    12.97    08:06:35.90 +61:36:38.2   2845 2949   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71039_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 71039_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.41819    2461257.91819    13.00    07:33:37.62 +59:50:49.7   0284 2160   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71051_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 71051_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.41819    2461257.91819    13.00    08:09:27.79 +66:04:43.1   3159 5634   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71054_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 71054_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.41819    2461257.91819    12.99    07:53:48.89 +58:18:23.9   1723 1026   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71055_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 71055_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.41819    2461257.91819    13.24    07:40:41.55 +58:39:50.5   0711 1363   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71059_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 71059_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.41819    2461257.91819    13.26    07:44:00.76 +60:12:28.7   1105 2257   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71076_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 71076_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.41819    2461257.91819    12.90    07:46:34.55 +56:50:54.5   1029 0203   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71079_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 71079_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.41819    2461257.91819    13.25    07:42:23.80 +65:32:25.6   1452 5473   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71119_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 71119_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.41819    2461257.91819    13.28    07:38:49.91 +60:41:13.4   0762 2600   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71125_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 71125_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.41819    2461257.91819    13.42    07:30:29.21 +62:26:54.6   0349 3757   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71132_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 71132_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.41819    2461257.91819    13.37    08:15:47.21 +60:21:15.1   3490 2172   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits

**** FOUND  08:15:47.40 +60:21:14.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71145_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 71145_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.41819    2461257.91819    13.35    08:12:23.61 +57:58:10.8   3193 0737   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71150_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 71150_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.41819    2461257.91819    12.93    08:50:30.07 +61:13:29.2   6005 2830   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71175_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 71175_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 05.41759    2461257.91759    13.33    08:23:24.29 +61:28:26.5   4046 2843   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-01-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0452.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.41819    2461257.91819    13.48    08:23:24.14 +61:28:28.2   4049 2847   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71187_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 71187_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.41819    2461257.91819    13.63    07:51:22.77 +60:01:16.2   1646 2079   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71196_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 71196_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.41819    2461257.91819    13.69    07:29:35.76 +61:39:39.3   0193 3299   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10578_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 10578_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.41819    2461257.91819    11.93    07:54:27.12 +65:18:53.3   2193 5241   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits

**** FOUND  07:54:27.16 +65:18:52.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70278_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 70278_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 08 05.41819    2461257.91819    13.27    08:33:32.50 +59:56:07.5   4823 1949   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (31.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39298_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 39298_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 08 05.41819    2461257.91819    12.60    07:41:22.89 +60:34:44.1   0941 2507   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17230_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 17230_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 08 05.41819    2461257.91819    11.87    08:37:24.15 +63:58:50.9   4952 4393   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits

**** FOUND  08:37:24.13 +63:58:51.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36104_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 36104_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 08 05.41819    2461257.91819    9.58    07:55:50.89 +57:11:55.5   1820 0340   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits

**** FOUND  07:55:50.92 +57:11:55.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01252_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453
The candidate 01252_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 08 05.41819    2461257.91819    11.96    08:31:43.87 +67:05:09.0   4494 6247   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_050829_TTUQ1b1x1_3460733_P7I5Epoo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_05-02-02_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0453.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.0") between the two second-epoch detections
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
########### Completed UMa-02-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
###################################################################################
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO  ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461257.91758777 -observatory V36
07:41:15.18 +20:21:58.6 Mercury (-0.2mag)
11:52:49.69 +00:19:32.4 Venus (-4.3mag)
05:41:06.11 +23:31:02.0 Mars (1.3mag)
08:40:24.74 +18:50:37.7 Jupiter (-1.8mag)
00:56:35.63 +03:17:18.0 Saturn (0.6mag)
04:11:23.84 +20:56:05.4 Uranus (5.8mag)
00:16:15.38 +00:14:17.9 Neptune (7.7mag)
20:28:24.62 -23:29:05.4 Pluto (14.4mag)
02:01:32.07 +16:58:32.8 Moon (-10.6mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 Aug  5 05:10 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461257.91758777:
08:40:21.76 +18:50:52.0 Io (6.0mag)
08:40:34.07 +18:49:58.2 Europa (6.3mag)
08:40:12.73 +18:51:31.8 Ganymede (5.6mag)
08:40:04.83 +18:52:04.6 Callisto (6.7mag)
08:38:01.59 +18:48:18.8 Himalia (15.7mag)
08:40:25.66 +18:50:35.0 Thebe (16.6mag)
08:37:31.70 +18:47:23.6 Elara (17.7mag)
08:44:30.17 +18:31:25.4 Pasiphae (17.9mag)
08:43:46.71 +19:00:18.0 Carme (19.0mag)
00:56:37.26 +03:17:42.4 Titan (8.4mag)
00:56:34.35 +03:17:26.6 Rhea (9.7mag)
00:56:36.92 +03:15:31.9 Iapetus (11.1mag)
00:56:24.36 +03:17:38.8 Hyperion (14.4mag)
00:56:01.69 +03:10:51.1 Phoebe (16.5mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Aug  5 05:10 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461257.91758777:
18:51:49.67 -24:22:46.8 JWST
14:26:34.45 +52:55:55.9 Chandra
06:19:43.36 +22:46:46.8 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Aug  5 05:10 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461257.91758777 -observatory V36
03:10:26.99 +17:08:15.7 17.7mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist)
18:02:40.68 -34:38:35.2 14.0mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
06:51:09.73 -68:47:57.8 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
06:09:03.84 +32:56:05.5 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
03:35:14.23 +36:20:11.1 16.7mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
22:40:55.79 +31:36:34.1 17.3mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
06:40:40.10 +26:35:20.3 16.8mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
10:18:58.55 +28:35:45.7 17.0mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
09:26:58.79 +05:17:32.6 17.9mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
15:12:02.32 -12:10:39.2 17.9mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
21:14:29.95 +66:18:47.7 17.9mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
15:50:46.51 -12:40:22.9 14.3mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
08:04:55.22 +31:13:11.4 15.2mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:07:26.88 +15:37:04.4 17.7mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
19:06:42.51 +42:54:21.5 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
21:14:50.08 +49:01:16.8 17.6mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS)
05:12:51.83 -13:00:21.2 15.5mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
06:54:22.58 +24:38:55.2 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
07:29:35.25 -15:45:33.9 17.6mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS)
10:29:01.45 +21:04:50.2 17.3mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
12:56:28.55 +02:32:02.7 17.0mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
16:04:04.95 +78:05:19.3 16.8mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
03:06:22.03 +46:07:39.3 17.1mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
11:44:29.76 +08:14:35.4 17.3mag A/2026 E1
21:55:09.70 -26:06:31.6 6.9mag 10P/Tempel
11:27:17.58 -03:13:40.6 16.2mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
04:35:44.47 +32:11:13.5 18.0mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson
11:01:57.86 +05:33:38.1 17.2mag 63P/Wild
00:54:18.24 -05:21:08.2 15.5mag 65P/Gunn
05:29:09.33 +20:44:19.8 13.7mag 78P/Gehrels
20:40:30.96 -23:11:48.2 17.8mag 84P/Giclas
02:57:52.41 +13:28:32.0 16.7mag 88P/Howell
07:48:40.20 +28:02:01.0 16.1mag 93P/Lovas
03:58:29.88 +15:47:07.4 17.7mag 112P/Urata-Niijima
05:47:11.70 +30:35:21.1 16.3mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
09:11:49.73 +27:07:07.6 15.0mag 123P/West-Hartley
11:38:08.37 -09:11:11.2 17.1mag 124P/Mrkos
05:32:23.65 +21:11:14.0 16.1mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
06:23:41.33 +19:01:57.6 17.9mag 131P/Mueller
00:03:47.61 +03:25:35.0 17.6mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma
03:21:44.81 -19:46:48.8 14.1mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
07:06:25.63 +37:38:14.0 15.8mag 162P/SidingSpring
16:03:24.99 +38:45:39.0 12.4mag 169P/NEAT
02:37:46.44 +09:27:21.3 17.6mag 220P/McNaught
16:40:12.71 -09:53:12.4 17.6mag 235P/LINEAR
20:24:17.45 -52:50:30.1 17.8mag 259P/Garradd
03:13:55.92 +23:58:24.6 15.4mag 260P/McNaught
06:56:53.54 +37:45:56.8 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR
15:09:36.93 +03:26:48.7 17.7mag 391P/Kowalski
08:58:19.52 +18:30:47.2 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.5K Aug  5 05:10 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00  ASASSN-26er  2026-07-25.82 15.09
01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00  SN2026vbh  2026-07-25.61 15.97
21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90  ASASSN-26eq  2026-07-24.37 15.13
18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60  ASASSN-26ep  2026-07-23.47 -4.06
12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50  ASASSN-26et  2026-07-22.76 13.98
13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60  SN2026uwk  2026-07-21.75 16.38
18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90  ASASSN-26en  2026-07-21.77 14.63
14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10  ASASSN-26es  2026-07-20.79 15.36
20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00  ASASSN-26em  2026-07-20.94 16.83
18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70  ASASSN-26eu  2026-07-20.93 14.86
03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40  AT2026ugi  2026-07-20.03 17.12
18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80  ASASSN-26eo  2026-07-19.36 16.16
04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80  ASASSN-26ej  2026-07-16.17 17.02
18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90  ASASSN-26ek  2026-07-16.24 15.73
17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50  ASASSN-26el  2026-07-15.86 16.01
14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30  ASASSN-26ei  2026-07-16.17 16.46
10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10  AT 2023mhb  2026-07-14.73 16.67
14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20  AT 2026unl  2026-07-15.27 17.11
10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80  ASASSN-26eh  2026-07-14.72 16.58
19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80  ASASSN-22le  2026-07-14.15 15.5
02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30  ASASSN-26ef  2026-07-12.35 15.86
23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70  SN 2026qtn  2026-07-12.22 16.47
02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40  ASASSN-26ec  2026-07-11.53 2.78
18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50  AT2026stb  2026-07-11.28 -1.29
13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00  AT2026pjf  2026-07-10.18 -0.72
17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70  SN2026pir  2026-07-9.86 -0.66
11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30  ASASSN-26ed  2026-07-8.8 -1.3
23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10  AT2026qil  2026-07-9.3 16.15
20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10  ASASSN-26ee  2026-07-7.22 15.53
19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80  AT2026ryu  2026-07-7.17 14.88
11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50  AT2026qqg  2026-07-5.01 16.82
19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30  AT2026qly  2026-07-5.02 17.31
17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10  ASASSN-26ea  2026-07-5.07 16.67
19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30  ASASSN-26eb  2026-07-4.97 15.52
18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20  SN 2026qqp  2026-07-5.03 -0.92
19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90  ASASSN-26dz  2026-07-5.14 15.91
19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90  AT 2026rdg  2026-07-3.43 11.81
04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40  AT 2026qpr  2026-06-30.4 15.96
13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80  SN 2026pub  2026-06-30.09 16.01
16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70  SN 2026pel  2026-06-26.38 16.07
10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30  ASASSN-26dy  2026-06-25.99 15.63
14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30  ASASSN-26dv  2026-06-23.03 14.62
13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70  ASASSN-26dw  2026-06-23.04 16.09
00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20  SN 2026mke  2026-06-22.39 17.13
11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50  SN 2026nmv  2026-06-22.06 16.56
21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50  AT2026oxh  2026-06-22.15 17.14
17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90  ASASSN-26dx  2026-06-22.02 14.72
14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10  AT2026pvk  2026-06-22.06 16.53
20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20  AT2026plb  2026-06-21.31 16.4
15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30  SN2026ore  2026-06-21.29 17.57
23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30  AT2026oxl  2026-06-21.52 17.64
17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20  AT2026ouj  2026-06-20.92 15.15
00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20  AT2026ntk  2026-06-18.09 17.34
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20  ASASSN-26du  2026-06-15.39 15.93
23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00  SN2026oxc  2026-06-14.35 16.83
02:02:26.78 +32:04:21.30  AT2026ovz  2026-06-14.59 15.39
21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50  AT2026nwc  2026-06-11 17.05
17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20  SN 2026odc  2026-06-11.23 17.62
13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20  SN 2026nyq  2026-06-11.1 16.24
00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90  ASASSN-26dt  2026-06-11.13 10.22
14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60  SN2026nyp  2026-06-10.3 16.32
12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50  SN2026mta  2026-06-8.29 16.69
12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20  SN2026oao  2026-06-9.32 17.02
10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60  AT2026nvf  2026-06-8.12 16.75
13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00  SN2026npn  2026-06-8.02 17.58
00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20  ASASSN-26dq  2026-06-7.43 13.58
01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70  SN 2026obc  2026-06-7.43 15.15
21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90  ASASSN-26dr  2026-06-7.24 16.24
06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00  ASASSN-26ds  2026-06-2.97 15.02
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40  SN2026mho  2026-05-25.18 -1.12
11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10  AT2026min  2026-05-24.21 16.63
11:44:33.11 -68:48:32.90  ASASSN-26no  2026-05-24.03 8.35
19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60  ASASSN-26dp  2026-05-22.31 -3.28
14:23:56.59 -58:37:47.40  ASASSN-26dn  2026-05-20.01 14.59
11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60  AT2026nma  2026-05-20.29 15.46
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10  AT2026lli  2026-05-19.34 15.86
00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70  AT2026nad  2026-05-19.39 15.34
15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40  ASASSN-26dm  2026-05-19.03 14.44
11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10  ASASSN-26dl  2026-05-18.02 13.55
13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00  ASASSN-26dk  2026-05-18.16 12.96
02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60  ASASSN-26dh  2026-05-18.43 15.37
17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90  ASASSN-26dj  2026-05-17.05 15.7
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10  ASASSN-26dg  2026-05-13.41 16.8
16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40  AT2026mhn  2026-05-12.33 15.8
09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00  ASASSN-26di  2026-05-12.14 14.63
21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00  AT2026kwu  2026-05-12.26 16.9
14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90  AT2026ktm  2026-05-12.06 17.21
14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40  AT2026lkm  2026-05-11.18 16.89
12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80  SN2026kep  2026-05-9.06 17.5
13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90  AT2026lkd  2026-05-9.09 17.23
09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60  SN2026kmo  2026-05-8.99 17.51
15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.80  AT2026lxf  2026-05-8.34 13.72
10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30  ASASSN-26df  2026-05-8.21 16.52
22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60  2026lda  2026-05-7.56 16.2
21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30  ASASSN-26de  2026-05-6.29 14.51
16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60  ASASSN-26dd  2026-05-5.15 15.93
14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50  AT2026lig  2026-05-4.27 14.63
13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50  SN2026kcp  2026-05-4.46 16.43
11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90  SN2026kza  2026-05-1.08 15.59
22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30  SN 2026fov  2026-04-29.6 14.36
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Aug  5 05:10 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4  PNV J00425120+4116594  2022-10-26.135  19.3mag
12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0  TCP J12242510+2847120  2026-05-31.6015  14.8mag
00:56:07.13 +43:01:40.6  TCP J00560713+4301406  2026-06-01.4135  12.2mag
00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2  PNV J00424164+4115162  2026-06-02.029  17.4mag
00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2  PNV J00423868+4115582  2026-06-05.1224  19.97Umag
19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7  PNV J19004295-4831017  2026-05-25.0752  14.2mag
09:55:21.28 +69:02:52.6  PNV J09552128+6902526  2026-06-13.933  18.9mag
19:51:21.42 +37:06:40.0  TCP J19512142+3706400  2026-06-17.2942  16.8mag
19:57:03.87 +37:41:46.4  TCP J19570387+3741464  2026-06-18.2638  17.5mag
00:42:32.04 +41:10:28.3  PNV J00423204+4110283  2026-06-26.059  16.6mag
02:19:17.36 +28:57:15.8  TCP J02191736+2857158  2026-07-12.3549  12.5mag
00:44:56.43 +41:57:41.6  PNV J00445643+4157416  2026-07-13.8026  17.98Cmag
00:42:55.36 +41:17:27.0  PNV J00425536+4117270  2026-07-20.1813  17.7mag
20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9  TCP J20354364+6131329  2026-07-20.5443  14.4mag
21:17:31.48 +22:25:51.0  TCP J21173148+2225510  2026-07-23.5577  14.8mag
00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8  PNV J00412404+4049028  2026-07-25.0157  18.7mag
00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6  PNV J00430426+4102286  2026-07-26.1512  20mag
14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0  TCP J14515140+6613240  2026-07-29.2561  13.5mag
00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2  PNV J00430615+4122082  2026-07-30.0085  19.4mag
00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2  PNV J00413323+4110122  2026-08-02.8913  17.1mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 189K Aug  5 05:10 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
13:26:10.063 -16:31:39.35  AT 2026veb  2026-07-19.29 18.748
15:04:36.261 -42:05:00.15  AT 2026vea  2026-07-15.38 19.28
15:40:32.860 -29:39:49.28  AT 2026vdz  2026-07-15.40 18.96
15:52:47.663 -24:57:36.67  AT 2026vdy  2026-07-20.37 19.7
16:03:13.659 -23:49:43.48  AT 2026vdx  2026-07-15.44 19.73
02:01:59.494 -27:33:08.94  AT 2026vdw  2026-07-19.82 19.43
15:10:37.347 +08:41:02.43  AT 2026vdv  2026-07-20.39 17.63
00:48:47.035 -17:46:37.99  AT 2026vdu  2026-07-19.83 19.69
15:08:14.743 -20:24:40.47  AT 2026vdt  2026-07-15.37 19.81
12:37:49.799 -40:14:52.54  AT 2026vds  2026-07-15.40 18.95
17:22:30.654 +19:42:09.07  SN 2026vdr  2026-07-17.91 19.5
20:41:44.088 -01:12:34.78  AT 2026vdq  2026-07-20.01 18.35
14:49:19.169 -14:49:17.78  AT 2026vdp  2026-07-15.38 20.17
00:42:55.360 +41:17:27.00  AT 2026vdo  2026-07-20.08 17.7
18:01:57.813 +32:54:02.20  AT 2026vdn  2026-07-15.24 20.8647
17:45:13.282 +43:23:54.28  AT 2026vdm  2026-07-12.34 20.6398
21:52:40.898 +29:03:58.38  AT 2026vdl  2026-07-12.05 19.09
16:53:07.017 +53:15:53.01  AT 2026vdk  2026-07-19.80 19.75
17:29:48.362 +40:12:07.56  AT 2026vdj  2026-07-19.85 19.22
17:09:35.647 +52:57:47.42  AT 2026vdi  2026-07-10.75 19.25
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 87K Aug  5 05:10 tns_transients_list.txt

=== Transient Factory Profiling ===
Started: Wed Aug  5 05:10:22 CDT 2026
=======================================
TIMING SExtractor: 1 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 1 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 0 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 0 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 3s (0.05 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 23s (0.38 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 0s (0.00 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 6s (0.10 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 0s (0.00 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 0s (0.00 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 3s (0.05 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 1s (0.02 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 36s (0.60 min)
TIMING SExtractor: 5 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 1 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 1 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 3 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 11s (0.18 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 1s (0.02 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 0s (0.00 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 9s (0.15 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 1s (0.02 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 1s (0.02 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 0s (0.00 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 2s (0.03 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 24s (0.40 min)
FIELD_UMa-02-Q1b1x1: 73s (1.22 min)
=======================================
TOTAL_RUNTIME: 74s (1.23 min)
Finished: Wed Aug  5 05:11:36 CDT 2026