This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_045432_TTUQ1b1x1_2969238_QbsREzXc
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 05.4087 2461257.9087 11.86 05:36:33.64 +31:44:12.8
176.58935 -0.17537 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.7" and 9.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.115 Thyra 1 -1 1 12.2 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:36:33.64 +31:44:12.8: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:36:33.64 +31:44:12.8: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461257.9087,11.86,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260805.4087 11.86CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 05.4087 2461257.9087 11.80 06:20:25.78 +33:22:40.6
179.75409 8.66268 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.1" and 10.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.89 Julia 1 -0 1 11.6 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:20:25.78 +33:22:40.6: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:20:25.78 +33:22:40.6: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461257.9087,11.80,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260805.4087 11.80CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 05.4087 2461257.9087 13.22 05:54:07.97 +33:16:01.8
177.21296 3.78398 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 9.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.702 Alauda 1 0 1 13.7 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:54:07.97 +33:16:01.8: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:54:07.97 +33:16:01.8: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461257.9087,13.22,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260805.4087 13.22CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 05.4087 2461257.9087 12.62 06:10:41.44 +31:47:07.1
180.22054 6.10714 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 9.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.250 Bettina 1 -0 1 13.3 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:10:41.44 +31:47:07.1: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:10:41.44 +31:47:07.1: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461257.9087,12.62,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260805.4087 12.62CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.61992316 22.02.2026 02:52:31.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
First image: 2461093.61992316 22.02.2026 02:52:31.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Last image: 2461257.90923339 05.08.2026 09:49:07.765 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_045432_TTUQ1b1x1_2969238_QbsREzXc/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 4
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.72
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 25208
Objects passed selection criteria: 25040
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 16565.5
Average stars matched: 16058.5 (96.9394 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 250444 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Aug 4 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-188-g9fc0b030
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-04)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Aug 5 04:56:45 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.61992316 22.02.2026 02:52:31.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
First image: 2461093.61992316 22.02.2026 02:52:31.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Last image: 2461257.90923339 05.08.2026 09:49:07.765 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_045432_TTUQ1b1x1_2969238_QbsREzXc/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 106
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.36
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 33 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 193271
Objects passed selection criteria: 192697
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 133939
Average stars matched: 128794 (96.1593 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 654232 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Aug 4 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-188-g9fc0b030
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-04)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Aug 5 04:57:57 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_045432_TTUQ1b1x1_2969238_QbsREzXc/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-47-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_045432_TTUQ1b1x1_2969238_QbsREzXc/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_045432_TTUQ1b1x1_2969238_QbsREzXc/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-47-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_045432_TTUQ1b1x1_2969238_QbsREzXc/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461257.90820795
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits'
wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-47-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-47-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-47-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-47-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits'
wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:00.478 +29:59:52.02 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-47-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-47-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
Image size: 945.1'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:59:50.516 +30:01:45.69 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:00:00.478 +29:59:52.02
Second-epoch image center 05:59:50.516 +30:01:45.69
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0478 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
Image size: 944.9'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:59:53.771 +30:02:28.62 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:00:00.478 +29:59:52.02
Second-epoch image center 05:59:53.771 +30:02:28.62
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0498 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:59:50.516 +30:01:45.69
Second-epoch second image center 05:59:53.771 +30:02:28.62
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01673 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XXZrjnbDgh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits &> /tmp/tmp.N2utaktB2J
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_045432_TTUQ1b1x1_2969238_QbsREzXc/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-47-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits &> /tmp/tmp.MbIJuRLtRj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_045432_TTUQ1b1x1_2969238_QbsREzXc/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-47-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_045432_TTUQ1b1x1_2969238_QbsREzXc/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits &> /tmp/tmp.k5DDew9Tvb
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_045432_TTUQ1b1x1_2969238_QbsREzXc/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 27193 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5790 to 99.6671 deg, Dec +24.3414 to +35.3066 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5790 to 99.6671 deg, Dec 24.3414 to 35.3066 deg
Loaded 17097 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 12045 out of 13628 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 13628 out of 27193 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.946400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.946400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.72
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.23
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.23
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 27193 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5790 to 99.6671 deg, Dec +24.3414 to +35.3066 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5790 to 99.6671 deg, Dec 24.3414 to 35.3066 deg
Loaded 17097 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 12045 out of 13628 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 13628 out of 27193 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 27141 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5933 to 99.6669 deg, Dec +24.3420 to +35.3116 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5933 to 99.6669 deg, Dec 24.3420 to 35.3116 deg
Loaded 17089 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 12096 out of 13641 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 13641 out of 27141 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
2.1 pix Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
2.4 pix fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-47-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
2.3 pix fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
15.2 mag. Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
13.4 mag. fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-47-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
13.4 mag. fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.4 (SNR ) 10.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.XXZrjnbDgh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_045432_TTUQ1b1x1_2969238_QbsREzXc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3136, bad_region=0, passed=27193
Got 27193 stars (including 24022 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27193 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4849 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4793 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4793 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4793 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27193 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4849 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4793 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27193 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4793 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27193 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 4793 stars left (next iteration limit 5272)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits N_match=4793 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.593 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.452 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.444 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.391 n_q1=1003 n_q2=1397 n_q3=1274 n_q4=1119 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.304
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits -region wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.N2utaktB2J (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_045432_TTUQ1b1x1_2969238_QbsREzXc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3121, bad_region=0, passed=27141
Got 27141 stars (including 23994 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27141 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4852 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4798 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4798 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4798 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27141 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4852 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4799 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27141 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4799 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27141 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 4799 stars left (next iteration limit 5277)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits N_match=4799 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.453 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.562 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.461 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.446 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.384 n_q1=1006 n_q2=1397 n_q3=1273 n_q4=1123 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.242
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -region wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.MbIJuRLtRj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_045432_TTUQ1b1x1_2969238_QbsREzXc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_045432_TTUQ1b1x1_2969238_QbsREzXc/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-47-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_045432_TTUQ1b1x1_2969238_QbsREzXc/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-47-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_045432_TTUQ1b1x1_2969238_QbsREzXc/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-47-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_045432_TTUQ1b1x1_2969238_QbsREzXc/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-47-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_045432_TTUQ1b1x1_2969238_QbsREzXc/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-47-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_045432_TTUQ1b1x1_2969238_QbsREzXc/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-47-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-47-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-47-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-47-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-47-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-47-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-47-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-47-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_045432_TTUQ1b1x1_2969238_QbsREzXc/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-47-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-47-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=333, bad_region=0, passed=6132
Got 6132 stars (including 5792 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-47-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6132 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013126 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010501 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 629 (Dec 24.3 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4869 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4792 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4793 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4792 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6132 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 629 (Dec 24.3 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4869 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4790 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6132 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4790 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6132 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 4790 stars left (next iteration limit 5271)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4790 robust_rms=6.547 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.382 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4790 robust_rms=0.569 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.825 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4790 robust_rms=0.476 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.593 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4790 robust_rms_before=1.317 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.445 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.476 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.583 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.593
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.583 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-47-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits N_match=4790 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.451 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.572 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.419 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.444 n_q1=1288 n_q2=813 n_q3=1749 n_q4=940 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.268
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-47-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-47-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_045432_TTUQ1b1x1_2969238_QbsREzXc/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-47-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-47-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-47-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.k5DDew9Tvb (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_045432_TTUQ1b1x1_2969238_QbsREzXc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_045432_TTUQ1b1x1_2969238_QbsREzXc/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_045432_TTUQ1b1x1_2969238_QbsREzXc/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_045432_TTUQ1b1x1_2969238_QbsREzXc/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_045432_TTUQ1b1x1_2969238_QbsREzXc/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_045432_TTUQ1b1x1_2969238_QbsREzXc/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_045432_TTUQ1b1x1_2969238_QbsREzXc/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_045432_TTUQ1b1x1_2969238_QbsREzXc/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=360, bad_region=0, passed=6170
Got 6170 stars (including 5803 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6170 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013124 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010499 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 629 (Dec 24.3 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4870 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4795 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4796 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4795 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6170 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 629 (Dec 24.3 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4868 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4796 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6170 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4796 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6170 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 4796 stars left (next iteration limit 5274)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4796 robust_rms=6.747 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.611 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4796 robust_rms=0.536 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.678 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4796 robust_rms=0.428 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.542 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4796 robust_rms_before=1.197 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.436 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.428 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.556 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.542
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.556 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits N_match=4796 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.437 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.558 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.407 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.434 n_q1=1263 n_q2=840 n_q3=1744 n_q4=949 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.277
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_045432_TTUQ1b1x1_2969238_QbsREzXc/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits sigma_overall=0.454 worst_q_ratio=1.304
ref2=Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits sigma_overall=0.453 worst_q_ratio=1.242
new1=fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-47-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits sigma_overall=0.451 worst_q_ratio=1.268
new2=fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits sigma_overall=0.437 worst_q_ratio=1.277
reference average sigma_overall=0.4535 worst_q_ratio=1.273
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056_astrometric_residuals.png (4793 matched stars from wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.43 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_astrometric_residuals.png (4799 matched stars from wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.43 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-47-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438_astrometric_residuals.png (4790 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-47-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.40 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439_astrometric_residuals.png (4796 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.40 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-47-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-47-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_045432_TTUQ1b1x1_2969238_QbsREzXc/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-47-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_045432_TTUQ1b1x1_2969238_QbsREzXc/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31900_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 31900_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:21.53 +29:29:38.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08609_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 08609_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:33:17.03 +31:35:29.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17096_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 17096_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:17.14 +28:29:02.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25384_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 25384_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:48.85 +25:25:24.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Aur-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_045432_TTUQ1b1x1_2969238_QbsREzXc/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-47-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_045432_TTUQ1b1x1_2969238_QbsREzXc/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_045432_TTUQ1b1x1_2969238_QbsREzXc/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-47-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_045432_TTUQ1b1x1_2969238_QbsREzXc/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-47-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-47-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:00.478 +29:59:52.02 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-47-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-47-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
Image size: 945.1'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:59:50.516 +30:01:45.69 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:00:00.478 +29:59:52.02
Second-epoch image center 05:59:50.516 +30:01:45.69
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0478 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
Image size: 944.9'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:59:53.771 +30:02:28.62 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:00:00.478 +29:59:52.02
Second-epoch image center 05:59:53.771 +30:02:28.62
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0498 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:59:50.516 +30:01:45.69
Second-epoch second image center 05:59:53.771 +30:02:28.62
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01673 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits &> /tmp/tmp.P5kJq8zNlp
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nokWM4n8cR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_045432_TTUQ1b1x1_2969238_QbsREzXc/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-47-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JmpNpWr57S
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_045432_TTUQ1b1x1_2969238_QbsREzXc/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-47-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_045432_TTUQ1b1x1_2969238_QbsREzXc/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pkd7mmSXEX
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_045432_TTUQ1b1x1_2969238_QbsREzXc/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 212828 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5594 to 99.6902 deg, Dec +24.3171 to +35.3065 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5594 to 99.6902 deg, Dec 24.3171 to 35.3065 deg
Loaded 17190 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9236 out of 14303 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14303 out of 212828 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.790850
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.790850
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.36
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.43
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.43
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 212828 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5594 to 99.6902 deg, Dec +24.3171 to +35.3065 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5594 to 99.6902 deg, Dec 24.3171 to 35.3065 deg
Loaded 17190 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9236 out of 14303 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14303 out of 212828 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 212641 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.5682 to 99.6901 deg, Dec +24.3244 to +35.3140 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.5682 to 99.6901 deg, Dec 24.3244 to 35.3140 deg
Loaded 17179 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9281 out of 14295 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14295 out of 212641 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 97 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
1.9 pix Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
2.3 pix fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-47-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
2.2 pix fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
15.4 mag. Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
13.5 mag. fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-47-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
13.6 mag. fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.5 (SNR ) 13.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.P5kJq8zNlp (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_045432_TTUQ1b1x1_2969238_QbsREzXc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=1, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=79, blended=32424, bad_region=1, passed=212748
Got 212748 stars (including 179989 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 212748 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4810 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4767 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 212748 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4810 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 212748 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 212748 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 4766 stars left (next iteration limit 5242)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits N_match=4766 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.431 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.566 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.439 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.375 n_q1=1028 n_q2=1362 n_q3=1243 n_q4=1133 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.313
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits -region wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.nokWM4n8cR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_045432_TTUQ1b1x1_2969238_QbsREzXc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=51, blended=32176, bad_region=4, passed=212590
Got 212590 stars (including 180083 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 212590 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4805 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4766 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 212590 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4805 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 212590 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 212590 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4766 stars left (next iteration limit 5242)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits N_match=4766 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.575 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.419 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.371 n_q1=1026 n_q2=1364 n_q3=1217 n_q4=1159 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.319
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -region wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.JmpNpWr57S (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_045432_TTUQ1b1x1_2969238_QbsREzXc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_045432_TTUQ1b1x1_2969238_QbsREzXc/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-47-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_045432_TTUQ1b1x1_2969238_QbsREzXc/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-47-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_045432_TTUQ1b1x1_2969238_QbsREzXc/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-47-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_045432_TTUQ1b1x1_2969238_QbsREzXc/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-47-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_045432_TTUQ1b1x1_2969238_QbsREzXc/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-47-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_045432_TTUQ1b1x1_2969238_QbsREzXc/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-47-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-47-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-47-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-47-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-47-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-47-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-47-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-47-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_045432_TTUQ1b1x1_2969238_QbsREzXc/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-47-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-47-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=2372, bad_region=3, passed=55054
Got 55054 stars (including 52605 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-47-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 55054 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013126 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010501 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4858 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4792 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55041 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4857 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4792 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55041 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4792 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55041 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 4792 stars left (next iteration limit 5270)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-47-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-47-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits N_match=4792 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.438 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.577 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.406 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.443 n_q1=1308 n_q2=831 n_q3=1714 n_q4=939 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.319
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-47-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-47-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_045432_TTUQ1b1x1_2969238_QbsREzXc/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-47-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-47-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-47-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.pkd7mmSXEX (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_045432_TTUQ1b1x1_2969238_QbsREzXc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_045432_TTUQ1b1x1_2969238_QbsREzXc/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_045432_TTUQ1b1x1_2969238_QbsREzXc/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_045432_TTUQ1b1x1_2969238_QbsREzXc/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_045432_TTUQ1b1x1_2969238_QbsREzXc/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_045432_TTUQ1b1x1_2969238_QbsREzXc/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_045432_TTUQ1b1x1_2969238_QbsREzXc/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_045432_TTUQ1b1x1_2969238_QbsREzXc/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=2577, bad_region=4, passed=58104
Got 58104 stars (including 55447 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 58104 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013124 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010499 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 629 (Dec 24.3 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4860 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4794 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4795 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4794 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58104 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 629 (Dec 24.3 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4857 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4795 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58104 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4795 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58104 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 4795 stars left (next iteration limit 5273)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits N_match=4795 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.431 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.523 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.402 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.425 n_q1=1300 n_q2=854 n_q3=1700 n_q4=941 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.215
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_045432_TTUQ1b1x1_2969238_QbsREzXc/fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-47-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_045432_TTUQ1b1x1_2969238_QbsREzXc/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-47-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0438.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_045432_TTUQ1b1x1_2969238_QbsREzXc/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:07:38.49 +29:55:09.3: 12.54 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:23:56.24 +33:24:43.6: 12.56 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:00:11.47 +29:12:33.7: 13.36 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:39:33.38 +27:23:13.1: 12.80 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:41:11.91 +26:16:28.4: 12.57 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:23:56.24 +33:24:43.6: 12.54 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:39:33.38 +27:23:13.1: 12.76 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:41:11.91 +26:16:28.4: 12.54 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:00:11.47 +29:12:33.7: 13.41 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:07:38.49 +29:55:09.3: 12.53 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.55 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.78 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.54 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.56 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.39 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:23:56.24 +33:24:43.6: ref_mag=12.55 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.0229 delta=-0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:39:33.38 +27:23:13.1: ref_mag=12.78 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8052 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:07:38.49 +29:55:09.3: ref_mag=12.54 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4595 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:00:11.47 +29:12:33.7: ref_mag=13.39 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.1732 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:41:11.91 +26:16:28.4: ref_mag=12.56 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5683 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:27:29.88 +29:01:22.3: 12.11 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:37:11.28 +34:48:48.1: 9.96 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:27:29.88 +29:01:22.3: 12.13 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.12 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:27:29.88 +29:01:22.3: ref_mag=12.12 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2515 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:36:33.64 +31:44:12.8: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:37:11.28 +34:48:48.1: 9.96 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.96 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:37:11.28 +34:48:48.1: ref_mag=9.96 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.4776 delta=-0.52 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:52:24.02 +32:33:21.5: 12.40 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:20:25.78 +33:22:40.6: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:44:33.17 +25:41:04.1: 12.14 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:36:33.64 +31:44:12.8: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:52:24.02 +32:33:21.5: 12.49 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.44 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:52:24.02 +32:33:21.5: ref_mag=12.44 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=12.0573 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:44:33.17 +25:41:04.1: 12.13 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:20:25.78 +33:22:40.6: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.13 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:44:33.17 +25:41:04.1: ref_mag=12.13 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0656 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:38:48.10 +35:04:24.8: 12.88 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:06:18.80 +29:32:46.1: 12.67 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:44:49.33 +30:37:22.7: 13.00 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:38:48.10 +35:04:24.8: 12.95 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.91 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:38:48.10 +35:04:24.8: ref_mag=12.91 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6959 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:23:36.37 +24:29:48.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:08:19.77 +30:15:45.1: 12.87 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:06:18.80 +29:32:46.1: 12.67 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.67 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:06:18.80 +29:32:46.1: ref_mag=12.67 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5428 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:44:49.33 +30:37:22.7: 13.04 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.02 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:44:49.33 +30:37:22.7: ref_mag=13.02 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8948 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:23:36.37 +24:29:48.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:23:36.37 +24:29:48.3: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:38:20.91 +34:43:08.5: 13.09 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:08:19.77 +30:15:45.1: 12.88 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.88 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:08:19.77 +30:15:45.1: ref_mag=12.88 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6524 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:38:20.91 +34:43:08.5: 13.12 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.11 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:38:20.91 +34:43:08.5: ref_mag=13.11 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0894 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:55:29.05 +29:09:22.9: 12.90 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 05:54:07.97 +33:16:01.8: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:55:29.05 +29:09:22.9: 12.89 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.89 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:55:29.05 +29:09:22.9: ref_mag=12.89 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6667 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:54:07.97 +33:16:01.8: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-52-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0056.fits at 06:10:41.44 +31:47:07.1: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-53-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:10:41.44 +31:47:07.1: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out242409.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out242491.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out243068.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out66768.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242158_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242158_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242173_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242173_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242175_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242175_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:46.85 +30:46:14.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242177_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242177_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242180_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242180_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:21.17 +34:19:41.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242182_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242182_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:47.04 +28:37:34.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242183_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242183_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:17.92 +32:30:10.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242184_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242184_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242187_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242187_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242189_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242189_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:25.29 +26:27:38.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242190_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242190_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:27.70 +26:06:20.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242192_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242192_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:59.64 +34:57:14.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242194_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242194_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:28.10 +33:20:37.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242197_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242197_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:56:10.18 +26:56:27.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242199_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242199_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:25:52.54 +30:37:40.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242200_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242200_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242201_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242201_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:20.37 +35:01:44.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242202_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242202_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:44.16 +33:42:36.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242203_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242203_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:14.61 +32:34:52.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242204_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242204_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:18.12 +32:31:16.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242205_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242205_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:07.80 +32:34:17.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242206_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242206_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:21.56 +29:29:38.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242250_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242250_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242329_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242329_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:12.29 +32:03:14.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242377_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242377_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:41.50 +34:26:43.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242409_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
Preparing report for the candidate 242409_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242417_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242417_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:00.45 +27:56:29.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242418_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242418_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:16.38 +32:35:32.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242451_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242451_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:33.44 +28:34:29.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242467_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242467_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:49.69 +26:44:17.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242473_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242473_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:52.62 +27:35:10.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242479_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242479_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:09.84 +34:55:01.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242483_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242483_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242491_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
Preparing report for the candidate 242491_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242509_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242509_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:33.18 +28:37:19.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242512_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242512_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:27.74 +28:29:43.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242544_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242544_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242547_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242547_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:40.70 +34:23:16.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242562_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242562_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:11.60 +32:30:21.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242593_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242593_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:01.87 +25:55:17.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242604_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242604_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:19.36 +31:39:30.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242605_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242605_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:23.35 +28:38:33.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242609_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242609_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:32.63 +30:30:49.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242632_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242632_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:12:10.49 +32:41:30.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242637_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242637_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:36.99 +25:05:43.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242655_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242655_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:15.07 +34:48:42.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242661_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242661_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242666_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242666_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:40:55.04 +32:52:27.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242695_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242695_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:15.59 +31:22:55.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242698_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242698_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:05:03.67 +26:04:36.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242762_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242762_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:16.62 +32:45:56.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242767_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242767_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:09.83 +24:56:00.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242768_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242768_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242810_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242810_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242813_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242813_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242822_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242822_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:40:45.49 +27:47:11.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242829_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242829_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242835_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242835_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:06:57.01 +26:41:00.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242856_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242856_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:42.17 +30:13:04.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242879_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242879_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:14.17 +33:06:40.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242880_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242880_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:14.82 +31:57:28.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242883_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242883_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242901_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242901_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:33.91 +29:00:27.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242909_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242909_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:32.65 +30:42:56.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242915_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242915_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:56:30.14 +32:40:49.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242918_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242918_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:10.36 +29:22:43.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242947_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242947_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242953_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242953_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:34.66 +30:30:37.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242963_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 242963_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:50:50.71 +27:58:17.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243045_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 243045_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:10:19.28 +30:31:57.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243061_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 243061_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:48.31 +25:47:56.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243068_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
Preparing report for the candidate 243068_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64657_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 64657_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:33:16.96 +31:35:29.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 136018_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 136018_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:21.01 +28:36:31.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88249_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 88249_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:56:48.37 +30:50:08.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168208_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 168208_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:43.54 +25:40:40.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156560_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 156560_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:40:49.14 +27:36:16.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177443_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 177443_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:59.93 +26:08:15.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56703_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 56703_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:57:14.79 +32:22:38.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146773_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 146773_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:39.84 +28:00:51.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24946_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 24946_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:43:36.99 +33:54:12.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115105_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 115105_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:47.42 +29:32:54.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89530_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 89530_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:01.52 +30:45:31.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08027_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 08027_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:18:22.87 +34:38:14.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62401_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 62401_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:08:39.99 +32:01:55.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107520_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 107520_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:28.76 +29:51:03.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20812_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 20812_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:33:11.36 +33:40:09.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137469_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 137469_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:17.09 +28:29:01.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59148_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 59148_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:07:00.29 +32:13:10.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66768_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
Preparing report for the candidate 66768_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158400_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 158400_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:15:28.47 +27:23:45.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82530_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 82530_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:21:56.80 +30:53:16.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79040_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 79040_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:29:12.81 +30:56:51.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09876_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 09876_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:02:50.42 +34:41:48.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63229_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 63229_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:03.22 +32:03:18.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162899_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 162899_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:48.88 +25:25:24.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153136_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439
The candidate 153136_fd_Aur-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_04-49-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0439 did not pass the final checks