Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 08 05.2503  2461257.7503  11.03  20:36:32.53 -14:35:38.8
 31.02434 -29.74737 galactic  Cap  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 8.4 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
287 Nephthys                 0     -1       1  10.9    -0   -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:36:32.53 -14:35:38.8:  15.48 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:36:32.53 -14:35:38.8:  15.50 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits


fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits


fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs  wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits  wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits -crosshair 5333.62744 442.13309 image    wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits -crosshair 5340.23291 436.86920 image   

./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 08 05.25030 20 36 32.53 -14 35 38.8          11.0 R      V36

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 08 05.24995 20 36 32.56 -14 35 38.7          11.0 R      V36
     TAU0008  C2026 08 05.25065 20 36 32.51 -14 35 38.9          11.0 R      V36

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 08 05.2503*  20 36 32.53 -14 35 38.8  11.0 U             Cap       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461257.7503,11.03,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260805.2503 11.03CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 08 05.2503  2461257.7503  12.55  20:53:37.32 -07:13:17.9
 40.79714 -30.40118 galactic  Aqr  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 8.5 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
490 Veritas                 -0     -0       0  12.9    -0   -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:53:37.32 -07:13:17.9:  15.21 +/- 0.24  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:53:37.32 -07:13:17.9:  15.36 +/- 0.27  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  15.28 +/- 0.18
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits


fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits


fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs  wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits  wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits -crosshair 7632.23340 5023.86230 image    wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits -crosshair 7639.01562 5018.66211 image   

./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 08 05.25030 20 53 37.32 -07 13 17.9          12.6 R      V36

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 08 05.24995 20 53 37.33 -07 13 17.9          12.5 R      V36
     TAU0008  C2026 08 05.25065 20 53 37.30 -07 13 17.9          12.6 R      V36

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 08 05.2503*  20 53 37.32 -07 13 17.9  12.6 U             Aqr       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461257.7503,12.55,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260805.2503 12.55CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 08 05.2503  2461257.7503  12.97  20:19:46.54 -10:51:49.2
 32.97136 -24.49129 galactic  Cap  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 8.4 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
1058 Grubba                  -3     -1       3  13.1     0   -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:19:46.54 -10:51:49.2:  15.57 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:19:46.54 -10:51:49.2:  15.57 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits


fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits


fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs  wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits  wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits -crosshair 2724.23853 2529.34180 image    wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits -crosshair 2731.08838 2524.40332 image   

./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 08 05.25030 20 19 46.54 -10 51 49.2          13.0 R      V36

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 08 05.24995 20 19 46.53 -10 51 49.5          13.0 R      V36
     TAU0008  C2026 08 05.25065 20 19 46.56 -10 51 49.0          12.9 R      V36

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 08 05.2503*  20 19 46.54 -10 51 49.2  13.0 U             Cap       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461257.7503,12.97,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260805.2503 12.97CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field Cap-01-Q1b1x1 reference image: Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Field Cap-01-Q1b1x1 reference image: Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Field Cap-01-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
Field Cap-01-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits

## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461241.82588149 20.07.2026 07:49:06.161   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
First image: 2461241.82588149 20.07.2026 07:49:06.161   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Last  image: 2461257.75064502 05.08.2026 06:00:45.730   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 8
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.76
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  10.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     55000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.37            # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  13767
Objects passed selection criteria:  13746
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.6    4.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.6    4.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 12714
Average stars matched: 12467 (98.0573 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   239220 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Tue Aug  4 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-188-g9fc0b030
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-04)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Wed Aug  5 01:05:20 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461241.82588149 20.07.2026 07:49:06.161   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
First image: 2461241.82588149 20.07.2026 07:49:06.161   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Last  image: 2461257.75064502 05.08.2026 06:00:45.730   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 45
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.52
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 49 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  2.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     57000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.83            # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  88050
Objects passed selection criteria:  87920
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.4    4.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.4    4.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 78158.8
Average stars matched: 75902.5 (97.1132 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   581608 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Tue Aug  4 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-188-g9fc0b030
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-04)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Wed Aug  5 01:07:07 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Cap-01-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Cap-01-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Cap-01-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 420252 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 420252 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 

Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:

MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes


renamed 'Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.png' -> 'transient_report/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits_preview.png'

Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits


renamed 'Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.png' -> 'transient_report/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits_preview.png'

Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits




Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 760.1159
INFO:         REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 571.7854
INFO:    SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1751.2435
INFO:            SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 640.2359
INFO:   SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1750.0423
INFO:           SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 640.1648
----------------------------------------------
INFO:      ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.30392
INFO:                  SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.000
INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     28.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits 
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
Header: 67 keys total, 4 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-05T00:59:45.3690337' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-05T05:59:45.3690337' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61257.2498306599 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-05T05:59:55.2725471' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61257.2499452778 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     308.568338935509 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =    -9.99970934195499 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     45.8316666666667 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     169.986944444444 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     1.39282720851845 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =     33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=    -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'Cap-01'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '20 34 17'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-10 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                29508 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                29508 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     28.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     28.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 56: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 57: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 58: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 59: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 60: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 61: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 62: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 63: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 64: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/d_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits :)

Spent 0.689500 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/d_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 26658.571233
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=17308.5, right_median=19900.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     28.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits 
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
Header: 67 keys total, 4 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-05T01:00:45.7306661' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-05T06:00:45.7306661' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61257.2505292823 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-05T06:00:55.6318183' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61257.2506438773 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     308.568338922472 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =    -9.99970936142129 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     45.8672222222222 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     170.337777777778 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     1.39199131810057 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =     33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=    -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'Cap-01'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '20 34 17'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-10 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                29508 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                29508 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     28.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     28.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 56: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 57: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 58: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 59: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 60: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 61: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 62: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 63: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 64: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/d_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits :)

Spent 0.703930 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/d_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 26658.571233
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=17308.5, right_median=19900.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:


fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits



fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits




Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1

  ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461257.74994640
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits'
wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits'
wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits'
wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.8'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:16.286 -09:58:34.63 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
Image size: 940.6'x626.5'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:33:57.981 -09:59:19.05 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:16.286 -09:58:34.63
Second-epoch image center 20:33:57.981 -09:59:19.05
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0761 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
Image size: 940.6'x626.5'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:33:55.373 -09:58:46.04 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:16.286 -09:58:34.63
Second-epoch image center 20:33:55.373 -09:58:46.04
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0859 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  20:33:57.981 -09:59:19.05
Second-epoch second image center 20:33:55.373 -09:58:46.04
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01409 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Skvhvumgaz
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4QjIF4WQXR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ekXW5ag6FW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WliRIecgeM
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat 
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 14476 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.2012 to 316.7417 deg, Dec -15.5581 to -4.2220 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.2012 to 316.7417 deg, Dec -15.5581 to -4.2220 deg
Loaded 10223 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7857 out of 8140 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8140 out of 14476 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.734000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.734000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.76
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  14.97

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  14.97

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 14476 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.2012 to 316.7417 deg, Dec -15.5581 to -4.2220 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.2012 to 316.7417 deg, Dec -15.5581 to -4.2220 deg
Loaded 10223 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7857 out of 8140 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8140 out of 14476 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 14495 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.2013 to 316.7416 deg, Dec -15.5578 to -4.2219 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.2013 to 316.7416 deg, Dec -15.5578 to -4.2219 deg
Loaded 10223 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7839 out of 8130 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8130 out of 14495 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 8 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.6 pix  Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
 2.6 pix  Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
 3.5 pix  fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
 3.5 pix  fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.0 mag.  Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
 15.0 mag.  Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
 14.5 mag.  fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
 14.5 mag.  fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  14.5 (SNR )  11.9 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.Skvhvumgaz (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=755, bad_region=0, passed=14476
Got 14476 stars (including 13702 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14476 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4875 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14476 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14476 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14476 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Excluding outliers - 4875 stars left (next iteration limit 5362)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits N_match=4875 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.275 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.220 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.277 n_q1=1163 n_q2=1365 n_q3=1107 n_q4=1240 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.134
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits -region wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.4QjIF4WQXR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=763, bad_region=0, passed=14495
Got 14495 stars (including 13716 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14495 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4875 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14495 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4902 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14495 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14495 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Excluding outliers - 4874 stars left (next iteration limit 5362)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits N_match=4874 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.287 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.238 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.288 n_q1=1171 n_q2=1357 n_q3=1105 n_q4=1241 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.141
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits -region wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ekXW5ag6FW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=496, bad_region=0, passed=11109
Got 11109 stars (including 10608 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11109 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013064 (47.0 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010451 (37.6 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4902 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4881 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11109 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4901 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4879 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11109 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4879 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11109 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Excluding outliers - 4879 stars left (next iteration limit 5368)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4879 robust_rms=9.270 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.286 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4879 robust_rms=0.367 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.403 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4879 robust_rms=0.308 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.399 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=4879 robust_rms_before=0.799 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.334 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.367 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.423 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.403
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.423 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits N_match=4879 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.443 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.277 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.276 n_q1=1224 n_q2=1031 n_q3=1467 n_q4=1157 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.336
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.WliRIecgeM (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=507, bad_region=0, passed=11113
Got 11113 stars (including 10596 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11113 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013064 (47.0 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010451 (37.6 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4879 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4879 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4879 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11113 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11113 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11113 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Excluding outliers - 4878 stars left (next iteration limit 5366)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4878 robust_rms=9.386 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.140 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4878 robust_rms=0.388 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.422 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4878 robust_rms=0.314 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.411 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=4878 robust_rms_before=0.836 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.332 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.388 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.438 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.422
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.438 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits N_match=4878 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.446 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.275 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.281 n_q1=1215 n_q2=1031 n_q3=1474 n_q4=1158 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.346
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits sigma_overall=0.275 worst_q_ratio=1.134
ref2=Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits sigma_overall=0.287 worst_q_ratio=1.141
new1=fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits sigma_overall=0.331 worst_q_ratio=1.336
new2=fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits sigma_overall=0.331 worst_q_ratio=1.346
reference average sigma_overall=0.281 worst_q_ratio=1.1375
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################

Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234_astrometric_residuals.png (4875 matched stars from wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235_astrometric_residuals.png (4874 matched stars from wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208_astrometric_residuals.png (4879 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209_astrometric_residuals.png (4878 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)


Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:54:45.27 -08:54:14.7:  12.21 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:36:32.53 -14:35:38.8:  15.48 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:08:37.12 -08:59:02.7:  12.41 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:36:32.53 -14:35:38.8:  15.50 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:08:37.12 -08:59:02.7:  12.42 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:54:45.27 -08:54:14.7:  12.24 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.22 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.41 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:08:37.12 -08:59:02.7: ref_mag=12.41 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1054 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:54:45.27 -08:54:14.7: ref_mag=12.22 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0907 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20897.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20869_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 20869_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.25065    2461257.75065    11.80    20:02:05.69 -14:16:29.2   0260 0235   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits

**** FOUND  20:02:05.72 -14:16:29.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20897_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
Preparing report for the candidate 20897_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20914_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 20914_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.25065    2461257.75065    11.52    20:07:16.61 -13:15:16.9   0984 0929   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits

**** FOUND  20:07:16.62 -13:15:16.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20931_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 20931_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 05.24995    2461257.74995    12.11    20:08:37.11 -08:59:02.8   0971 3537   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.25065    2461257.75065    12.11    20:08:37.13 -08:59:02.6   0978 3532   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20938_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 20938_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 05.24995    2461257.74995    12.09    20:54:45.29 -08:54:15.0   7848 4014   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.25065    2461257.75065    12.09    20:54:45.25 -08:54:14.4   7855 4009   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20445_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 20445_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 08 05.25065    2461257.75065    11.57    20:11:03.32 -13:18:57.3   1548 0941   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits

**** FOUND  20:11:03.31 -13:18:57.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04121_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 04121_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 08 05.25065    2461257.75065    10.18    20:22:13.35 -07:21:03.5   2946 4664   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits

**** FOUND  20:22:13.36 -07:21:03.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11505_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 11505_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 08 05.25065    2461257.75065    11.01    20:23:53.16 -12:49:16.8   3420 1389   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits

**** FOUND  20:23:53.17 -12:49:16.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 8s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cap-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
20:36:32.53 -14:35:38.8
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL

  ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.8'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:16.286 -09:58:34.63 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
Image size: 940.6'x626.5'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:33:57.981 -09:59:19.05 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:16.286 -09:58:34.63
Second-epoch image center 20:33:57.981 -09:59:19.05
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0761 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
Image size: 940.6'x626.5'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:33:55.373 -09:58:46.04 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:16.286 -09:58:34.63
Second-epoch image center 20:33:55.373 -09:58:46.04
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0859 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  20:33:57.981 -09:59:19.05
Second-epoch second image center 20:33:55.373 -09:58:46.04
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01409 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZDWDB5nwD5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DApE3j8Wi5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PVgHlwji4W
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits &> /tmp/tmp.iVObUap73S
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat 
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 95426 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.1405 to 316.7614 deg, Dec -15.5975 to -4.1906 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.1405 to 316.7614 deg, Dec -15.5975 to -4.1906 deg
Loaded 10309 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7294 out of 8388 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8388 out of 95426 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.648000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.648000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.52
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.13

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.13

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 95426 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.1405 to 316.7614 deg, Dec -15.5975 to -4.1906 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.1405 to 316.7614 deg, Dec -15.5975 to -4.1906 deg
Loaded 10309 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7294 out of 8388 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8388 out of 95426 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits (aperture=5.1)
Read 95800 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.1479 to 316.7695 deg, Dec -15.5883 to -4.1862 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.1479 to 316.7695 deg, Dec -15.5883 to -4.1862 deg
Loaded 10308 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7289 out of 8389 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8389 out of 95800 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits (aperture=5.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 40 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.5 pix  Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
 2.5 pix  Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
 3.2 pix  fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
 3.2 pix  fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.1 mag.  Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
 15.1 mag.  Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
 14.6 mag.  fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
 14.6 mag.  fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  14.6 (SNR )  13.9 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.ZDWDB5nwD5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=6181, bad_region=13, passed=95412
Got 95412 stars (including 89061 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 95412 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4882 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 95412 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 95412 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 95412 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Excluding outliers - 4882 stars left (next iteration limit 5370)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits N_match=4882 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.299 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.223 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.287 n_q1=1203 n_q2=1306 n_q3=1131 n_q4=1242 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.134
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits -region wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.DApE3j8Wi5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=20, blended=6280, bad_region=13, passed=95780
Got 95780 stars (including 89335 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 95780 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4882 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 95780 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 95780 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 95780 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Excluding outliers - 4882 stars left (next iteration limit 5370)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits N_match=4882 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.286 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.296 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.226 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.301 n_q1=1213 n_q2=1293 n_q3=1131 n_q4=1245 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.177
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits -region wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.PVgHlwji4W (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=3730, bad_region=8, passed=61792
Got 61792 stars (including 57983 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 61792 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013064 (47.0 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010451 (37.6 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4882 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61792 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4898 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61792 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61792 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 
Excluding outliers - 4881 stars left (next iteration limit 5369)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits N_match=4881 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.449 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.278 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.273 n_q1=1160 n_q2=1028 n_q3=1466 n_q4=1227 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.375
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.iVObUap73S (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=3742, bad_region=8, passed=61883
Got 61883 stars (including 58074 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 61883 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013064 (47.0 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010451 (37.6 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4901 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4885 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61883 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61883 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61883 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 
Excluding outliers - 4884 stars left (next iteration limit 5373)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits N_match=4884 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.323 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.448 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.266 n_q1=1157 n_q2=1038 n_q3=1465 n_q4=1224 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.390
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:19:11.18 -11:10:12.0:  13.41 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:36:46.46 -09:02:10.1:  13.80 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:57:42.85 -07:37:11.6:  14.34 +/- 0.12  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:56:15.51 -05:35:47.9:  13.23 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:12:44.90 -13:25:52.5:  13.30 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:58:58.11 -12:34:36.4:  13.23 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:04:05.51 -05:30:18.7:  14.13 +/- 0.10  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:04:32.85 -10:56:39.5:  13.51 +/- 0.06  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:51:44.24 -08:13:09.4:  11.64 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:53:47.88 -07:47:31.0:  10.39 +/- 0.00  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:04:05.51 -05:30:18.7:  14.13 +/- 0.10  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:58:58.11 -12:34:36.4:  13.20 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:12:44.90 -13:25:52.5:  13.38 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:04:32.85 -10:56:39.5:  13.53 +/- 0.06  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:19:11.18 -11:10:12.0:  13.41 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:56:15.51 -05:35:47.9:  13.27 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:57:42.85 -07:37:11.6:  14.12 +/- 0.09  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:36:46.46 -09:02:10.1:  13.88 +/- 0.06  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.21 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.13 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.41 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.52 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.34 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.25 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.21 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:58:58.11 -12:34:36.4: ref_mag=13.21 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5734 delta=-0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:04:05.51 -05:30:18.7: ref_mag=14.13 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.2627 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.84 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:19:11.18 -11:10:12.0: ref_mag=13.41 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8072 delta=-0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:04:32.85 -10:56:39.5: ref_mag=13.52 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5174 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:12:44.90 -13:25:52.5: ref_mag=13.34 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1658 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:57:42.85 -07:37:11.6: ref_mag=14.21 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.1145 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:56:15.51 -05:35:47.9: ref_mag=13.25 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4122 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:36:46.46 -09:02:10.1: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7401 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:51:44.24 -08:13:09.4:  11.68 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  11.66 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:51:44.24 -08:13:09.4: ref_mag=11.66 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8798 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:53:47.88 -07:47:31.0:  10.33 +/- 0.00  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  10.36 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:53:47.88 -07:47:31.0: ref_mag=10.36 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.5897 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:05:59.78 -05:34:54.2:  13.62 +/- 0.06  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:19:46.54 -10:51:49.2:  15.57 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 21:00:34.71 -11:01:18.9:  13.32 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:53:37.32 -07:13:17.9:  15.21 +/- 0.24  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:42:22.67 -08:15:07.9:  13.53 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:44:57.85 -11:00:52.4:  13.62 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:24:19.97 -11:35:07.4:  13.47 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:14:30.82 -06:39:29.4:  13.74 +/- 0.07  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:23:58.15 -06:06:23.5:  13.72 +/- 0.06  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:05:59.78 -05:34:54.2:  13.66 +/- 0.06  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:19:46.54 -10:51:49.2:  15.57 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.64 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 21:00:34.71 -11:01:18.9:  13.43 +/- 0.06  detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:05:59.78 -05:34:54.2: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5900 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:53:37.32 -07:13:17.9:  15.36 +/- 0.27  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.37 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:00:34.71 -11:01:18.9: ref_mag=13.37 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.1781 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  15.28 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:53:37.32 -07:13:17.9: ref_mag=15.28 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=12.5529 delta=2.72 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:42:22.67 -08:15:07.9:  13.54 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.53 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:42:22.67 -08:15:07.9: ref_mag=13.53 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5292 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:53:31.28 -06:13:57.9:  13.78 +/- 0.07  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:44:57.85 -11:00:52.4:  13.54 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.58 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:44:57.85 -11:00:52.4: ref_mag=13.58 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5419 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:24:19.97 -11:35:07.4:  13.45 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.46 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:24:19.97 -11:35:07.4: ref_mag=13.46 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4754 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:23:58.15 -06:06:23.5:  13.89 +/- 0.07  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:14:30.82 -06:39:29.4:  13.61 +/- 0.06  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.79 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:23:58.15 -06:06:23.5: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8231 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.67 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:14:30.82 -06:39:29.4: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7397 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:53:31.28 -06:13:57.9:  13.67 +/- 0.06  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.72 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:53:31.28 -06:13:57.9: ref_mag=13.72 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8442 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:41:50.18 -10:57:25.3:  13.78 +/- 0.06  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:48:09.32 -06:00:34.4:  14.03 +/- 0.08  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:35:26.27 -06:18:13.6:  14.00 +/- 0.07  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:33:10.86 -10:41:36.8:  14.03 +/- 0.07  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 21:03:20.39 -05:52:46.0:  14.77 +/- 0.19  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:42:36.92 -07:10:43.5:  14.57 +/- 0.12  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:41:50.18 -10:57:25.3:  13.67 +/- 0.06  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.72 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:41:50.18 -10:57:25.3: ref_mag=13.72 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7245 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:48:09.32 -06:00:34.4:  13.92 +/- 0.07  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.97 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:48:09.32 -06:00:34.4: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.9070 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:35:26.27 -06:18:13.6:  13.98 +/- 0.08  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.99 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:35:26.27 -06:18:13.6: ref_mag=13.99 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8388 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:33:10.86 -10:41:36.8:  13.93 +/- 0.07  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.98 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:33:10.86 -10:41:36.8: ref_mag=13.98 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0430 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 21:03:20.39 -05:52:46.0:  14.63 +/- 0.17  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:42:36.92 -07:10:43.5:  14.79 +/- 0.14  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.69 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.66 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:03:20.39 -05:52:46.0: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.1899 delta=0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:42:36.92 -07:10:43.5: ref_mag=14.66 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.6262 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:19:06.82 -10:01:48.0:  13.50 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:19:06.82 -10:01:48.0:  13.58 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.54 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:19:06.82 -10:01:48.0: ref_mag=13.54 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3757 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out113754.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out113827.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113594_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 113594_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 05.24995    2461257.74995    14.23    20:04:05.56 -05:30:19.0   0106 5600   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.25065    2461257.75065    14.29    20:04:05.47 -05:30:18.4   0113 5595   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113599_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 113599_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 05.24995    2461257.74995    14.10    20:57:42.83 -07:37:10.9   8261 4813   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.25065    2461257.75065    14.14    20:57:42.87 -07:37:12.3   8268 4808   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113608_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 113608_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.25065    2461257.75065    13.80    20:06:40.34 -06:34:46.5   0563 4968   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits

**** FOUND  20:06:40.33 -06:34:46.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113611_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 113611_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 05.24995    2461257.74995    13.80    20:19:11.19 -11:10:11.9   2650 2339   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.25065    2461257.75065    13.81    20:19:11.17 -11:10:12.1   2657 2333   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113615_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 113615_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 05.24995    2461257.74995    13.65    20:58:58.19 -12:34:36.4   8577 1817   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.25065    2461257.75065    13.52    20:58:58.03 -12:34:36.5   8583 1812   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113622_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 113622_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 05.24995    2461257.74995    13.64    20:04:32.87 -10:56:39.9   0454 2300   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.25065    2461257.75065    13.44    20:04:32.83 -10:56:39.1   0461 2296   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113623_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 113623_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 05.24995    2461257.74995    13.68    20:36:46.47 -09:02:09.6   5171 3792   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.25065    2461257.75065    13.83    20:36:46.46 -09:02:10.6   5178 3787   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113630_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 113630_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 05.24995    2461257.74995    13.56    20:56:15.50 -05:35:48.1   7989 6033   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.25065    2461257.75065    13.31    20:56:15.52 -05:35:47.6   7996 6027   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113635_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 113635_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 05.24995    2461257.74995    13.27    20:12:44.90 -13:25:49.5   1797 0898   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.25065    2461257.75065    13.10    20:12:44.89 -13:25:55.4   1804 0892   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113648_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 113648_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 05.24995    2461257.74995    12.02    20:51:44.22 -08:13:09.7   7376 4406   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.25065    2461257.75065    11.74    20:51:44.26 -08:13:09.1   7383 4401   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113649_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 113649_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 05.24995    2461257.74995    10.64    20:53:47.87 -07:47:31.2   7674 4680   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.25065    2461257.75065    10.54    20:53:47.89 -07:47:30.9   7681 4675   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113674_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 113674_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.25065    2461257.75065    11.06    20:36:32.47 -14:35:38.9   5340 0437   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits

**** FOUND  20:36:32.48 -14:35:38.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113700_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 113700_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.25065    2461257.75065    11.77    20:52:40.66 -08:56:57.3   7544 3967   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits

**** FOUND  20:52:40.65 -08:56:57.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113754_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
Preparing report for the candidate 113754_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113827_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
Preparing report for the candidate 113827_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113853_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 113853_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.25065    2461257.75065    13.39    20:14:28.06 -06:01:44.1   1720 5386   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits

**** FOUND  20:14:28.07 -06:01:43.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113870_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 113870_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 05.24995    2461257.74995    13.15    21:00:34.70 -11:01:19.5   8778 2769   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.25065    2461257.75065    13.21    21:00:34.72 -11:01:18.4   8785 2764   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113918_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 113918_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 05.24995    2461257.74995    13.56    20:05:59.81 -05:34:53.3   0402 5574   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.25065    2461257.75065    13.63    20:05:59.74 -05:34:55.1   0409 5569   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113922_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 113922_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.25065    2461257.75065    13.30    20:20:26.68 -06:23:28.0   2638 5227   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits

**** FOUND  20:20:26.70 -06:23:27.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113947_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 113947_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 05.24995    2461257.74995    13.53    20:42:22.76 -08:15:06.5   5978 4312   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.25065    2461257.75065    13.53    20:42:22.59 -08:15:09.4   5984 4306   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113948_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 113948_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 05.24995    2461257.74995    13.48    20:44:57.88 -11:00:52.6   6450 2670   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.25065    2461257.75065    13.64    20:44:57.81 -11:00:52.3   6457 2665   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113950_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 113950_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 05.24995    2461257.74995    13.47    20:24:19.94 -11:35:09.2   3428 2143   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.25065    2461257.75065    13.48    20:24:19.99 -11:35:05.5   3435 2138   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113964_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 113964_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.25065    2461257.75065    13.97    20:10:59.79 -07:09:30.5   1249 4664   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113975_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 113975_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 05.24995    2461257.74995    13.73    20:14:30.79 -06:39:28.7   1750 5010   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.25065    2461257.75065    13.75    20:14:30.86 -06:39:30.1   1757 5004   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113995_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 113995_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 05.24995    2461257.74995    13.82    20:23:58.12 -06:06:24.8   3148 5438   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.25065    2461257.75065    13.83    20:23:58.18 -06:06:22.2   3155 5434   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113997_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 113997_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 05.24995    2461257.74995    13.76    20:53:31.30 -06:13:57.9   7590 5623   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.25065    2461257.75065    13.96    20:53:31.25 -06:13:58.0   7597 5618   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114019_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 114019_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 05.24995    2461257.74995    13.90    20:48:09.31 -06:00:35.8   6774 5715   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.25065    2461257.75065    13.91    20:48:09.32 -06:00:33.0   6781 5710   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114020_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 114020_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 05.24995    2461257.74995    13.73    20:41:50.32 -10:57:25.4   5986 2680   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.25065    2461257.75065    13.72    20:41:50.04 -10:57:25.2   5992 2675   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114044_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 114044_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 05.24995    2461257.74995    14.07    20:35:26.34 -06:18:12.3   4875 5427   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.25065    2461257.75065    13.73    20:35:26.21 -06:18:14.8   4881 5421   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114064_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 114064_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 05.24995    2461257.74995    14.04    20:33:10.91 -10:41:37.1   4699 2765   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.25065    2461257.75065    14.04    20:33:10.81 -10:41:36.4   4705 2760   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114072_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 114072_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 05.24995    2461257.74995    14.22    21:03:20.42 -05:52:45.9   9078 5916   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.25065    2461257.75065    14.16    21:03:20.36 -05:52:46.2   9084 5911   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114107_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 114107_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 05.24995    2461257.74995    14.58    20:42:36.97 -07:10:42.6   5978 4961   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.25065    2461257.75065    14.76    20:42:36.87 -07:10:44.4   5985 4955   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69949_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 69949_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 08 05.25065    2461257.75065    12.27    20:26:13.33 -13:47:56.4   3802 0822   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits

**** FOUND  20:26:13.28 -13:47:56.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55761_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 55761_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.24995    2461257.74995    13.26    20:19:06.78 -10:01:48.3   2590 3024   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_00-59-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
Discovery image 3     2026 08 05.25065    2461257.75065    13.52    20:19:06.85 -10:01:47.6   2597 3019   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71630_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 71630_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 08 05.25065    2461257.75065    11.54    20:07:16.62 -13:15:16.9   0984 0929   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits

**** FOUND  20:07:16.62 -13:15:16.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71908_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 71908_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 08 05.25065    2461257.75065    11.51    20:11:03.34 -13:18:57.2   1548 0941   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits

**** FOUND  20:11:03.32 -13:18:57.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79549_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 79549_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 08 05.25065    2461257.75065    11.02    20:23:53.17 -12:49:16.7   3420 1389   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits

**** FOUND  20:23:53.18 -12:49:16.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66789_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 66789_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 08 05.25065    2461257.75065    12.69    20:48:08.49 -14:46:59.5   7044 0408   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits

**** FOUND  20:48:08.46 -14:46:59.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89295_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 89295_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 05.25065    2461257.75065    13.40    20:55:09.15 -12:20:44.2   8008 1930   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits

**** FOUND  20:55:09.14 -12:20:44.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28791_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 28791_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 08 05.25065    2461257.75065    10.18    20:22:13.35 -07:21:03.5   2946 4664   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_010254_TTUQ1b1x1_1066963_mT3xUVWc/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-05_01-00-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits

**** FOUND  20:22:13.35 -07:21:03.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 9s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cap-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
20:36:32.53 -14:35:38.8
20:53:37.32 -07:13:17.9
20:19:46.54 -10:51:49.2
########### Completed Cap-01-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
20:36:32.53 -14:35:38.8
20:53:37.32 -07:13:17.9
20:19:46.54 -10:51:49.2
###################################################################################
20:36:32.53 -14:35:38.8  -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
20:53:37.32 -07:13:17.9  -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
20:19:46.54 -10:51:49.2  -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO  ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461257.74994640 -observatory V36
07:40:21.52 +20:21:31.7 Mercury (-0.2mag)
11:52:13.07 +00:24:27.9 Venus (-4.3mag)
05:40:36.59 +23:30:39.0 Mars (1.3mag)
08:40:15.56 +18:51:10.9 Jupiter (-1.8mag)
00:56:36.19 +03:17:24.2 Saturn (0.6mag)
04:11:22.57 +20:56:02.0 Uranus (5.8mag)
00:16:15.92 +00:14:21.8 Neptune (7.7mag)
20:28:25.61 -23:29:01.4 Pluto (14.4mag)
01:54:20.93 +15:52:47.7 Moon (-10.6mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 Aug  5 01:05 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461257.74994640:
08:40:10.87 +18:51:32.0 Io (6.0mag)
08:40:26.25 +18:50:25.7 Europa (6.3mag)
08:40:02.49 +18:52:09.1 Ganymede (5.6mag)
08:39:54.58 +18:52:42.0 Callisto (6.7mag)
08:37:52.63 +18:48:45.9 Himalia (15.7mag)
08:40:20.17 +18:50:52.2 Thebe (16.6mag)
08:37:22.62 +18:47:52.7 Elara (17.7mag)
08:44:20.89 +18:32:03.4 Pasiphae (17.9mag)
08:43:38.19 +19:00:49.0 Carme (19.0mag)
00:56:38.63 +03:17:47.7 Titan (8.4mag)
00:56:36.19 +03:17:31.9 Rhea (9.7mag)
00:56:37.01 +03:15:36.5 Iapetus (11.1mag)
00:56:25.48 +03:17:46.2 Hyperion (14.4mag)
00:56:02.48 +03:10:58.6 Phoebe (16.5mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Aug  5 01:05 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461257.74994640:
18:51:48.38 -24:31:05.2 JWST
12:30:58.28 +54:03:45.4 Chandra
00:52:47.37 +64:00:07.4 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Aug  5 01:05 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461257.74994640 -observatory V36
03:10:15.22 +17:07:21.8 17.7mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist)
18:02:44.29 -34:38:38.9 14.0mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
06:51:00.18 -68:47:36.4 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
06:09:01.03 +32:55:52.7 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
03:34:43.10 +36:14:52.1 16.6mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
22:41:04.03 +31:37:06.2 17.3mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
06:40:29.82 +26:35:29.9 16.8mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
10:18:49.19 +28:36:13.1 17.0mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
09:26:51.98 +05:17:30.1 17.9mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
15:12:00.92 -12:10:16.8 17.9mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
21:14:43.80 +66:19:47.8 17.9mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
15:50:57.55 -12:39:26.4 14.3mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
08:04:43.58 +31:12:43.9 15.2mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:07:28.82 +15:37:05.7 17.7mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
19:06:55.68 +42:53:39.5 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
21:15:04.80 +49:00:33.0 17.6mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS)
05:12:43.53 -13:00:30.1 15.5mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
06:54:15.70 +24:40:39.9 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
07:29:30.50 -15:44:13.3 17.6mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS)
10:28:47.58 +21:05:27.2 17.3mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
12:56:22.71 +02:32:41.5 17.0mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
16:04:10.31 +78:06:14.6 16.9mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
03:06:17.60 +46:07:23.7 17.1mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
11:44:21.50 +08:13:28.1 17.2mag A/2026 E1
21:54:59.34 -26:02:09.8 6.9mag 10P/Tempel
11:27:11.60 -03:13:04.5 16.2mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
04:35:31.71 +32:10:15.9 18.0mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson
11:01:37.12 +05:36:55.9 17.2mag 63P/Wild
00:54:18.38 -05:20:48.7 15.5mag 65P/Gunn
05:28:46.16 +20:44:24.9 13.7mag 78P/Gehrels
20:40:40.43 -23:10:37.4 17.8mag 84P/Giclas
02:57:41.75 +13:27:42.2 16.7mag 88P/Howell
07:48:13.80 +28:03:18.3 16.1mag 93P/Lovas
03:58:02.07 +15:43:13.1 17.7mag 112P/Urata-Niijima
05:46:38.17 +30:36:13.3 16.3mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
09:11:25.57 +27:08:46.2 15.0mag 123P/West-Hartley
11:37:48.26 -09:07:17.7 17.1mag 124P/Mrkos
05:32:08.53 +21:11:13.5 16.1mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
06:23:23.77 +19:02:23.9 17.9mag 131P/Mueller
00:03:48.91 +03:25:37.2 17.6mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma
03:21:46.89 -19:47:11.2 14.1mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
07:05:50.25 +37:37:31.5 15.8mag 162P/SidingSpring
16:06:07.63 +38:36:31.8 12.4mag 169P/NEAT
02:37:27.37 +09:27:04.5 17.6mag 220P/McNaught
16:40:08.17 -09:52:30.2 17.6mag 235P/LINEAR
20:24:25.56 -52:50:25.2 17.8mag 259P/Garradd
03:13:26.67 +23:54:01.6 15.4mag 260P/McNaught
06:56:22.82 +37:46:02.6 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR
15:09:34.04 +03:27:54.6 17.7mag 391P/Kowalski
08:58:10.24 +18:31:16.2 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.5K Aug  5 01:05 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00  ASASSN-26er  2026-07-25.82 15.09
01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00  SN2026vbh  2026-07-25.61 15.97
21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90  ASASSN-26eq  2026-07-24.37 15.13
18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60  ASASSN-26ep  2026-07-23.47 -4.06
12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50  ASASSN-26et  2026-07-22.76 13.98
13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60  SN2026uwk  2026-07-21.75 16.38
18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90  ASASSN-26en  2026-07-21.77 14.63
14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10  ASASSN-26es  2026-07-20.79 15.36
20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00  ASASSN-26em  2026-07-20.94 16.83
18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70  ASASSN-26eu  2026-07-20.93 14.86
03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40  AT2026ugi  2026-07-20.03 17.12
18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80  ASASSN-26eo  2026-07-19.36 16.16
04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80  ASASSN-26ej  2026-07-16.17 17.02
18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90  ASASSN-26ek  2026-07-16.24 15.73
17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50  ASASSN-26el  2026-07-15.86 16.01
14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30  ASASSN-26ei  2026-07-16.17 16.46
10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10  AT 2023mhb  2026-07-14.73 16.67
14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20  AT 2026unl  2026-07-15.27 17.11
10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80  ASASSN-26eh  2026-07-14.72 16.58
19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80  ASASSN-22le  2026-07-14.15 15.5
02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30  ASASSN-26ef  2026-07-12.35 15.86
23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70  SN 2026qtn  2026-07-12.22 16.47
02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40  ASASSN-26ec  2026-07-11.53 2.78
18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50  AT2026stb  2026-07-11.28 -1.29
13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00  AT2026pjf  2026-07-10.18 -0.72
17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70  SN2026pir  2026-07-9.86 -0.66
11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30  ASASSN-26ed  2026-07-8.8 -1.3
23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10  AT2026qil  2026-07-9.3 16.15
20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10  ASASSN-26ee  2026-07-7.22 15.53
19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80  AT2026ryu  2026-07-7.17 14.88
11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50  AT2026qqg  2026-07-5.01 16.82
19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30  AT2026qly  2026-07-5.02 17.31
17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10  ASASSN-26ea  2026-07-5.07 16.67
19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30  ASASSN-26eb  2026-07-4.97 15.52
18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20  SN 2026qqp  2026-07-5.03 -0.92
19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90  ASASSN-26dz  2026-07-5.14 15.91
19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90  AT 2026rdg  2026-07-3.43 11.81
04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40  AT 2026qpr  2026-06-30.4 15.96
13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80  SN 2026pub  2026-06-30.09 16.01
16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70  SN 2026pel  2026-06-26.38 16.07
10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30  ASASSN-26dy  2026-06-25.99 15.63
14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30  ASASSN-26dv  2026-06-23.03 14.62
13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70  ASASSN-26dw  2026-06-23.04 16.09
00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20  SN 2026mke  2026-06-22.39 17.13
11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50  SN 2026nmv  2026-06-22.06 16.56
21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50  AT2026oxh  2026-06-22.15 17.14
17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90  ASASSN-26dx  2026-06-22.02 14.72
14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10  AT2026pvk  2026-06-22.06 16.53
20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20  AT2026plb  2026-06-21.31 16.4
15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30  SN2026ore  2026-06-21.29 17.57
23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30  AT2026oxl  2026-06-21.52 17.64
17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20  AT2026ouj  2026-06-20.92 15.15
00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20  AT2026ntk  2026-06-18.09 17.34
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20  ASASSN-26du  2026-06-15.39 15.93
23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00  SN2026oxc  2026-06-14.35 16.83
02:02:26.78 +32:04:21.30  AT2026ovz  2026-06-14.59 15.39
21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50  AT2026nwc  2026-06-11 17.05
17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20  SN 2026odc  2026-06-11.23 17.62
13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20  SN 2026nyq  2026-06-11.1 16.24
00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90  ASASSN-26dt  2026-06-11.13 10.22
14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60  SN2026nyp  2026-06-10.3 16.32
12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50  SN2026mta  2026-06-8.29 16.69
12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20  SN2026oao  2026-06-9.32 17.02
10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60  AT2026nvf  2026-06-8.12 16.75
13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00  SN2026npn  2026-06-8.02 17.58
00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20  ASASSN-26dq  2026-06-7.43 13.58
01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70  SN 2026obc  2026-06-7.43 15.15
21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90  ASASSN-26dr  2026-06-7.24 16.24
06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00  ASASSN-26ds  2026-06-2.97 15.02
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40  SN2026mho  2026-05-25.18 -1.12
11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10  AT2026min  2026-05-24.21 16.63
11:44:33.11 -68:48:32.90  ASASSN-26no  2026-05-24.03 8.35
19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60  ASASSN-26dp  2026-05-22.31 -3.28
14:23:56.59 -58:37:47.40  ASASSN-26dn  2026-05-20.01 14.59
11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60  AT2026nma  2026-05-20.29 15.46
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10  AT2026lli  2026-05-19.34 15.86
00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70  AT2026nad  2026-05-19.39 15.34
15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40  ASASSN-26dm  2026-05-19.03 14.44
11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10  ASASSN-26dl  2026-05-18.02 13.55
13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00  ASASSN-26dk  2026-05-18.16 12.96
02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60  ASASSN-26dh  2026-05-18.43 15.37
17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90  ASASSN-26dj  2026-05-17.05 15.7
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10  ASASSN-26dg  2026-05-13.41 16.8
16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40  AT2026mhn  2026-05-12.33 15.8
09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00  ASASSN-26di  2026-05-12.14 14.63
21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00  AT2026kwu  2026-05-12.26 16.9
14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90  AT2026ktm  2026-05-12.06 17.21
14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40  AT2026lkm  2026-05-11.18 16.89
12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80  SN2026kep  2026-05-9.06 17.5
13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90  AT2026lkd  2026-05-9.09 17.23
09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60  SN2026kmo  2026-05-8.99 17.51
15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.80  AT2026lxf  2026-05-8.34 13.72
10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30  ASASSN-26df  2026-05-8.21 16.52
22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60  2026lda  2026-05-7.56 16.2
21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30  ASASSN-26de  2026-05-6.29 14.51
16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60  ASASSN-26dd  2026-05-5.15 15.93
14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50  AT2026lig  2026-05-4.27 14.63
13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50  SN2026kcp  2026-05-4.46 16.43
11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90  SN2026kza  2026-05-1.08 15.59
22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30  SN 2026fov  2026-04-29.6 14.36
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Aug  5 01:05 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4  PNV J00425120+4116594  2022-10-26.135  19.3mag
12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0  TCP J12242510+2847120  2026-05-31.6015  14.8mag
00:56:07.13 +43:01:40.6  TCP J00560713+4301406  2026-06-01.4135  12.2mag
00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2  PNV J00424164+4115162  2026-06-02.029  17.4mag
00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2  PNV J00423868+4115582  2026-06-05.1224  19.97Umag
19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7  PNV J19004295-4831017  2026-05-25.0752  14.2mag
09:55:21.28 +69:02:52.6  PNV J09552128+6902526  2026-06-13.933  18.9mag
19:51:21.42 +37:06:40.0  TCP J19512142+3706400  2026-06-17.2942  16.8mag
19:57:03.87 +37:41:46.4  TCP J19570387+3741464  2026-06-18.2638  17.5mag
00:42:32.04 +41:10:28.3  PNV J00423204+4110283  2026-06-26.059  16.6mag
02:19:17.36 +28:57:15.8  TCP J02191736+2857158  2026-07-12.3549  12.5mag
00:44:56.43 +41:57:41.6  PNV J00445643+4157416  2026-07-13.8026  17.98Cmag
00:42:55.36 +41:17:27.0  PNV J00425536+4117270  2026-07-20.1813  17.7mag
20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9  TCP J20354364+6131329  2026-07-20.5443  14.4mag
21:17:31.48 +22:25:51.0  TCP J21173148+2225510  2026-07-23.5577  14.8mag
00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8  PNV J00412404+4049028  2026-07-25.0157  18.7mag
00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6  PNV J00430426+4102286  2026-07-26.1512  20mag
14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0  TCP J14515140+6613240  2026-07-29.2561  13.5mag
00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2  PNV J00430615+4122082  2026-07-30.0085  19.4mag
00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2  PNV J00413323+4110122  2026-08-02.8913  17.1mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 189K Aug  5 01:05 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
15:10:37.347 +08:41:02.43  AT 2026vdv  2026-07-20.39 17.63
00:48:47.035 -17:46:37.99  AT 2026vdu  2026-07-19.83 19.69
15:08:14.743 -20:24:40.47  AT 2026vdt  2026-07-15.37 19.81
12:37:49.799 -40:14:52.54  AT 2026vds  2026-07-15.40 18.95
17:22:30.654 +19:42:09.07  SN 2026vdr  2026-07-17.91 19.5
20:41:44.088 -01:12:34.78  AT 2026vdq  2026-07-20.01 18.35
14:49:19.169 -14:49:17.78  AT 2026vdp  2026-07-15.38 20.17
00:42:55.360 +41:17:27.00  AT 2026vdo  2026-07-20.08 17.7
18:01:57.813 +32:54:02.20  AT 2026vdn  2026-07-15.24 20.8647
17:45:13.282 +43:23:54.28  AT 2026vdm  2026-07-12.34 20.6398
21:52:40.898 +29:03:58.38  AT 2026vdl  2026-07-12.05 19.09
16:53:07.017 +53:15:53.01  AT 2026vdk  2026-07-19.80 19.75
17:29:48.362 +40:12:07.56  AT 2026vdj  2026-07-19.85 19.22
17:09:35.647 +52:57:47.42  AT 2026vdi  2026-07-10.75 19.25
18:09:45.403 +52:52:08.44  AT 2026vdh  2026-07-19.86 18.64
19:57:17.864 -00:48:07.49  AT 2026vdg  2026-07-19.83 19.36
10:58:53.375 +42:00:26.07  AT 2026vdf  2026-07-19.17 19.6018
13:17:26.777 +11:43:36.24  AT 2026vde  2026-03-17.44 20.0006
13:41:39.541 +44:54:17.04  AT 2026vdd  2026-07-15.21 20.5478
13:55:22.647 -27:41:06.85  AT 2026vdc  2026-07-15.37 17.42
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 87K Aug  5 01:05 tns_transients_list.txt

=== Transient Factory Profiling ===
Started: Wed Aug  5 01:04:54 CDT 2026
=======================================
TIMING SExtractor: 3 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 1 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 1 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 1 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 6s (0.10 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 34s (0.57 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 1s (0.02 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 9s (0.15 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 0s (0.00 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 1s (0.02 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 3s (0.05 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 8s (0.13 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 62s (1.03 min)
TIMING SExtractor: 27 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 11 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 1 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 8 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 51s (0.85 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 1s (0.02 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 0s (0.00 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 1s (0.02 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 20s (0.33 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 1s (0.02 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 1s (0.02 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 2s (0.03 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 9s (0.15 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 85s (1.42 min)
FIELD_Cap-01-Q1b1x1: 165s (2.75 min)
=======================================
TOTAL_RUNTIME: 168s (2.80 min)
Finished: Wed Aug  5 01:07:42 CDT 2026