This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_222018_TTUQ2b1x1_605421_OmybyVdc
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 05.1346 2461257.6346 12.97 19:52:55.31 -06:15:53.7
34.30800 -16.51449 galactic Aql Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 7.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.313 Chaldaea -0 1 1 13.2 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:52:55.31 -06:15:53.7: 15.58 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:52:55.31 -06:15:53.7: 15.58 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461257.6346,12.97,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260805.1346 12.97CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 05.1346 2461257.6346 13.10 19:18:49.19 -13:06:39.8
24.17512 -11.93192 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 7.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" V6505 Sgr
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.500 V 15.600 V 2454922.00000 257.000000000000
The object was found in astcheck.74487 1999 CE105 298 485 569 17.4 -0 -0
NOTE: the measured brightness disagrees with the predicted asteroid brightness, but the matched variable star above likely accounts for this object.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:18:49.19 -13:06:39.8: 14.18 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:18:49.19 -13:06:39.8: 14.22 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.20 +/- 0.10
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V6505 Sgr,2461257.6346,13.10,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V6505 Sgr 20260805.1346 13.10CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 05.1346 2461257.6346 13.03 19:20:35.02 -11:51:11.8
25.52446 -11.77869 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 7.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" V3956 Sgr
Type: RRAB
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.093 V 14.145 V 2452027.95000 0.412760800000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:20:35.02 -11:51:11.8: 14.15 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:20:35.02 -11:51:11.8: 13.91 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.01 +/- 0.07
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V3956 Sgr,2461257.6346,13.03,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V3956 Sgr 20260805.1346 13.03CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 05.1346 2461257.6346 12.85 19:16:06.27 -10:32:30.6
26.24065 -10.21912 galactic Aql Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 7.3 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" ASASSN-V J191606.26-103230.5
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.820 V 14.500 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:16:06.27 -10:32:30.6: 13.71 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:16:06.27 -10:32:30.6: 13.91 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.07
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J191606.26-103230.5,2461257.6346,12.85,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J191606.26-103230.5 20260805.1346 12.85CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461234.76742150 13.07.2026 06:24:55.218 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
First image: 2461234.76742150 13.07.2026 06:24:55.218 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
Last image: 2461257.63485426 05.08.2026 03:14:01.408 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_222018_TTUQ2b1x1_605421_OmybyVdc/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 2
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.80
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 9 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 13060
Objects passed selection criteria: 13044
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 11675
Average stars matched: 11397.2 (97.621 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 239832 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Aug 4 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-188-g9fc0b030
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-04)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Aug 5 00:13:39 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461234.76742150 13.07.2026 06:24:55.218 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
First image: 2461234.76742150 13.07.2026 06:24:55.218 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
Last image: 2461257.63485426 05.08.2026 03:14:01.408 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_222018_TTUQ2b1x1_605421_OmybyVdc/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 130
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 79 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 123530
Objects passed selection criteria: 123304
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 114323
Average stars matched: 110500 (96.6564 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 521420 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Aug 4 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-188-g9fc0b030
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-04)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Aug 5 00:16:00 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_222018_TTUQ2b1x1_605421_OmybyVdc/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-13-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_222018_TTUQ2b1x1_605421_OmybyVdc/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_222018_TTUQ2b1x1_605421_OmybyVdc/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-13-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_222018_TTUQ2b1x1_605421_OmybyVdc/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461257.63435767
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits'
wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits'
wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-13-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-13-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-13-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-13-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits'
wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:42:53.770 -09:59:26.45 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-13-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-13-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:42:51.764 -09:59:44.87 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:42:53.770 -09:59:26.45
Second-epoch image center 19:42:51.764 -09:59:44.87
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0097 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:42:48.911 -09:59:42.41 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:42:53.770 -09:59:26.45
Second-epoch image center 19:42:48.911 -09:59:42.41
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0204 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 19:42:51.764 -09:59:44.87
Second-epoch second image center 19:42:48.911 -09:59:42.41
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01173 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1HxjPXaDrN
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UU3PJ3cCKB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_222018_TTUQ2b1x1_605421_OmybyVdc/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-13-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits &> /tmp/tmp.HCSmbRDENL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_222018_TTUQ2b1x1_605421_OmybyVdc/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-13-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_222018_TTUQ2b1x1_605421_OmybyVdc/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6O6EKqVhqs
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_222018_TTUQ2b1x1_605421_OmybyVdc/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits and wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits and wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits and wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 17193 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 287.6609 to 303.8040 deg, Dec -15.2497 to -4.6824 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 287.6609 to 303.8040 deg, Dec -15.2497 to -4.6824 deg
Loaded 11410 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9135 out of 9587 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9587 out of 17193 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.678300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.678300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.80
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.88
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.88
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 17193 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 287.6609 to 303.8040 deg, Dec -15.2497 to -4.6824 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 287.6609 to 303.8040 deg, Dec -15.2497 to -4.6824 deg
Loaded 11410 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9135 out of 9587 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9587 out of 17193 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 17184 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 287.6555 to 303.8043 deg, Dec -15.2619 to -4.6821 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 287.6555 to 303.8043 deg, Dec -15.2619 to -4.6821 deg
Loaded 11423 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9132 out of 9602 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9602 out of 17184 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
2.3 pix Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
2.3 pix fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-13-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits
2.3 pix fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.9 mag. Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
14.9 mag. Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-13-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 11.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.1HxjPXaDrN (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-04_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_222018_TTUQ2b1x1_605421_OmybyVdc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits' -> 'wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1083, bad_region=3020, passed=17193
Got 17193 stars (including 13227 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 17193 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4887 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4887 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4887 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14786 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14786 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14786 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 4888 stars left (next iteration limit 5375)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits N_match=4888 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.499 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.499 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.455 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.560 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.441 n_q1=1847 n_q2=720 n_q3=1530 n_q4=791 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.123
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits -region wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.UU3PJ3cCKB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-04_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_222018_TTUQ2b1x1_605421_OmybyVdc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits' -> 'wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1110, bad_region=3013, passed=17184
Got 17184 stars (including 13206 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 17184 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4886 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14775 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14775 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14775 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Excluding outliers - 4884 stars left (next iteration limit 5373)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits N_match=4884 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.509 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.499 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.483 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.589 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.456 n_q1=1832 n_q2=720 n_q3=1528 n_q4=804 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.157
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits -region wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.HCSmbRDENL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-04_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_222018_TTUQ2b1x1_605421_OmybyVdc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_222018_TTUQ2b1x1_605421_OmybyVdc/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-13-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_222018_TTUQ2b1x1_605421_OmybyVdc/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-13-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_222018_TTUQ2b1x1_605421_OmybyVdc/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-13-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_222018_TTUQ2b1x1_605421_OmybyVdc/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-13-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_222018_TTUQ2b1x1_605421_OmybyVdc/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-13-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_222018_TTUQ2b1x1_605421_OmybyVdc/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-13-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-13-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-13-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-13-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-13-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-13-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-13-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-13-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_222018_TTUQ2b1x1_605421_OmybyVdc/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-13-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-13-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=644, bad_region=1945, passed=11256
Got 11256 stars (including 8778 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-13-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11256 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4890 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9721 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4891 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9721 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4891 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9721 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Excluding outliers - 4891 stars left (next iteration limit 5379)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4891 robust_rms=6.357 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=14.987 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4891 robust_rms=0.528 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.563 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4891 robust_rms=0.471 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.485 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4891 robust_rms_before=0.791 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.519 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.471 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.561 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.485
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-13-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-13-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:42:51.763 -09:59:45.58 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 11256 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-13-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-04_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_222018_TTUQ2b1x1_605421_OmybyVdc/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3429738.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.791 -> 0.471 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-13-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits N_match=4891 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.493 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.479 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.530 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.541 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.476 n_q1=1836 n_q2=678 n_q3=1575 n_q4=802 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.099
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-13-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-13-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_222018_TTUQ2b1x1_605421_OmybyVdc/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-13-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits -region wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-13-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-13-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.6O6EKqVhqs (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-04_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_222018_TTUQ2b1x1_605421_OmybyVdc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_222018_TTUQ2b1x1_605421_OmybyVdc/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_222018_TTUQ2b1x1_605421_OmybyVdc/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_222018_TTUQ2b1x1_605421_OmybyVdc/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_222018_TTUQ2b1x1_605421_OmybyVdc/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_222018_TTUQ2b1x1_605421_OmybyVdc/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_222018_TTUQ2b1x1_605421_OmybyVdc/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_222018_TTUQ2b1x1_605421_OmybyVdc/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=649, bad_region=1955, passed=11262
Got 11262 stars (including 8768 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11262 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4891 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4892 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4891 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9706 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9706 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9706 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Excluding outliers - 4892 stars left (next iteration limit 5380)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4892 robust_rms=6.429 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.929 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4892 robust_rms=0.524 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.571 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4892 robust_rms=0.470 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.498 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4892 robust_rms_before=0.793 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.523 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.470 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.579 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.498
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:42:48.910 -09:59:43.12 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 11262 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-04_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_222018_TTUQ2b1x1_605421_OmybyVdc/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3429792.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.793 -> 0.470 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits N_match=4892 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.493 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.492 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.512 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.543 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.456 n_q1=1845 n_q2=684 n_q3=1564 n_q4=799 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.102
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_222018_TTUQ2b1x1_605421_OmybyVdc/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits -region wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits sigma_overall=0.499 worst_q_ratio=1.123
ref2=Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits sigma_overall=0.509 worst_q_ratio=1.157
new1=fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-13-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits sigma_overall=0.493 worst_q_ratio=1.099
new2=fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits sigma_overall=0.493 worst_q_ratio=1.102
reference average sigma_overall=0.504 worst_q_ratio=1.14
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042_astrometric_residuals.png (4888 matched stars from wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.46 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043_astrometric_residuals.png (4884 matched stars from wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.46 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-13-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0044_astrometric_residuals.png (4891 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-13-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045_astrometric_residuals.png (4892 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.39 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-13-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-13-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_222018_TTUQ2b1x1_605421_OmybyVdc/wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-13-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_222018_TTUQ2b1x1_605421_OmybyVdc/wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aql-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21097_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 21097_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:48:18.59 -06:26:33.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07392_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 07392_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:46:30.54 -10:56:55.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Aql-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_222018_TTUQ2b1x1_605421_OmybyVdc/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-13-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_222018_TTUQ2b1x1_605421_OmybyVdc/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_222018_TTUQ2b1x1_605421_OmybyVdc/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-13-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_222018_TTUQ2b1x1_605421_OmybyVdc/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-13-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-13-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:42:53.770 -09:59:26.45 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-13-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-13-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:42:51.764 -09:59:44.87 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:42:53.770 -09:59:26.45
Second-epoch image center 19:42:51.764 -09:59:44.87
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0097 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:42:48.911 -09:59:42.41 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:42:53.770 -09:59:26.45
Second-epoch image center 19:42:48.911 -09:59:42.41
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0204 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 19:42:51.764 -09:59:44.87
Second-epoch second image center 19:42:48.911 -09:59:42.41
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01173 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DyNL4dN4f7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kJPRBnMBE7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_222018_TTUQ2b1x1_605421_OmybyVdc/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-13-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Nvi5cbBdwu
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_222018_TTUQ2b1x1_605421_OmybyVdc/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-13-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_222018_TTUQ2b1x1_605421_OmybyVdc/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6YqsTqg0R6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_222018_TTUQ2b1x1_605421_OmybyVdc/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits and wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits and wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits and wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 151351 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 287.6570 to 303.8111 deg, Dec -15.2567 to -4.6708 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 287.6570 to 303.8111 deg, Dec -15.2567 to -4.6708 deg
Loaded 11427 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8227 out of 10219 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10219 out of 151351 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.506000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.506000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.01
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.01
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 151351 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 287.6570 to 303.8111 deg, Dec -15.2567 to -4.6708 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 287.6570 to 303.8111 deg, Dec -15.2567 to -4.6708 deg
Loaded 11427 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8227 out of 10219 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10219 out of 151351 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 152274 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 287.6475 to 303.8112 deg, Dec -15.2629 to -4.6821 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 287.6475 to 303.8112 deg, Dec -15.2629 to -4.6821 deg
Loaded 11432 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8206 out of 10213 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10213 out of 152274 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 98 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
2.1 pix Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
2.1 pix fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-13-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits
2.1 pix fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.0 mag. Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
15.0 mag. Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-13-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 14.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.DyNL4dN4f7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-04_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_222018_TTUQ2b1x1_605421_OmybyVdc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits' -> 'wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=27, blended=14347, bad_region=18370, passed=151324
Got 151324 stars (including 119849 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 151324 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4911 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 137711 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 137711 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 137711 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4909 stars left (next iteration limit 5399)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits N_match=4909 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.480 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.480 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.438 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.553 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.444 n_q1=1844 n_q2=722 n_q3=1500 n_q4=843 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.151
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits -region wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.kJPRBnMBE7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-04_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_222018_TTUQ2b1x1_605421_OmybyVdc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits' -> 'wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=14548, bad_region=18412, passed=152258
Got 152258 stars (including 120598 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 152258 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4904 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 138572 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 138572 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 138572 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 4903 stars left (next iteration limit 5394)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits N_match=4903 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.490 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.477 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.453 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.562 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.464 n_q1=1840 n_q2=734 n_q3=1493 n_q4=836 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.148
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits -region wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Nvi5cbBdwu (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-04_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_222018_TTUQ2b1x1_605421_OmybyVdc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_222018_TTUQ2b1x1_605421_OmybyVdc/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-13-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_222018_TTUQ2b1x1_605421_OmybyVdc/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-13-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_222018_TTUQ2b1x1_605421_OmybyVdc/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-13-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_222018_TTUQ2b1x1_605421_OmybyVdc/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-13-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_222018_TTUQ2b1x1_605421_OmybyVdc/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-13-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_222018_TTUQ2b1x1_605421_OmybyVdc/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-13-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-13-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-13-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-13-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-13-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-13-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-13-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-13-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_222018_TTUQ2b1x1_605421_OmybyVdc/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-13-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-13-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=7720, bad_region=11065, passed=107314
Got 107314 stars (including 89349 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-13-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 107314 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4907 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 99207 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 99207 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 99207 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Excluding outliers - 4907 stars left (next iteration limit 5397)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-13-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-13-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits N_match=4907 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.494 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.504 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.472 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.551 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.473 n_q1=1859 n_q2=671 n_q3=1555 n_q4=822 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.116
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-13-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-13-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_222018_TTUQ2b1x1_605421_OmybyVdc/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-13-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits -region wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-13-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-13-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.6YqsTqg0R6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-04_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_222018_TTUQ2b1x1_605421_OmybyVdc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_222018_TTUQ2b1x1_605421_OmybyVdc/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_222018_TTUQ2b1x1_605421_OmybyVdc/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_222018_TTUQ2b1x1_605421_OmybyVdc/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_222018_TTUQ2b1x1_605421_OmybyVdc/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_222018_TTUQ2b1x1_605421_OmybyVdc/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_222018_TTUQ2b1x1_605421_OmybyVdc/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_222018_TTUQ2b1x1_605421_OmybyVdc/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=7776, bad_region=11174, passed=108005
Got 108005 stars (including 89880 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 108005 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4902 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 99722 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 99722 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 99722 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 4901 stars left (next iteration limit 5390)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits N_match=4901 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.503 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.528 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.483 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.551 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.499 n_q1=1870 n_q2=672 n_q3=1549 n_q4=810 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.094
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_222018_TTUQ2b1x1_605421_OmybyVdc/fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits -region wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-13-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_222018_TTUQ2b1x1_605421_OmybyVdc/wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-13-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0044.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_222018_TTUQ2b1x1_605421_OmybyVdc/wcs_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aql-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:28:13.75 -09:17:46.5: 14.56 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:15:34.49 -07:53:38.9: 14.34 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:26:08.05 -07:08:58.3: 13.77 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:47:44.87 -06:32:22.6: 14.13 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:29:40.93 -09:46:44.3: 14.56 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:35:46.83 -09:48:52.7: 14.02 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:25:24.99 -06:47:57.7: 14.50 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:28:13.75 -09:17:46.5: 14.59 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:26:08.05 -07:08:58.3: 13.90 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:29:40.93 -09:46:44.3: 14.76 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.58 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:28:13.75 -09:17:46.5: ref_mag=14.58 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5067 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:15:34.49 -07:53:38.9: 14.08 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:26:08.05 -07:08:58.3: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0400 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:29:40.93 -09:46:44.3: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4686 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:47:44.87 -06:32:22.6: 14.08 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.18 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:23:36.13 -05:46:17.8: 13.97 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.11 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:15:34.49 -07:53:38.9: ref_mag=14.18 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.1593 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:35:46.83 -09:48:52.7: 14.05 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:47:44.87 -06:32:22.6: ref_mag=14.11 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.1814 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:35:46.83 -09:48:52.7: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.2592 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:42:58.68 -07:43:24.0: 14.36 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:25:24.99 -06:47:57.7: 14.79 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.60 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:25:24.99 -06:47:57.7: ref_mag=14.60 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5417 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:33:49.75 -09:30:57.0: 14.06 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:23:36.13 -05:46:17.8: 13.94 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:23:36.13 -05:46:17.8: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.0953 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:42:58.68 -07:43:24.0: 14.26 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.30 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:42:58.68 -07:43:24.0: ref_mag=14.30 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.2576 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:33:49.75 -09:30:57.0: 14.01 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.03 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:33:49.75 -09:30:57.0: ref_mag=14.03 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0653 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:44:12.56 -07:12:00.8: 13.77 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:57:36.01 -12:19:50.7: 13.54 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:23:53.36 -06:07:35.5: 13.63 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:46:57.59 -06:03:22.0: 13.92 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:28:35.05 -12:15:25.0: 13.50 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:44:12.56 -07:12:00.8: 13.74 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:57:36.01 -12:19:50.7: 13.60 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:46:57.59 -06:03:22.0: 13.89 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:44:12.56 -07:12:00.8: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9061 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:57:36.01 -12:19:50.7: ref_mag=13.57 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7844 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:46:57.59 -06:03:22.0: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0531 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:35:11.07 -06:40:08.3: 13.50 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:23:53.36 -06:07:35.5: 13.71 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:23:53.36 -06:07:35.5: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9123 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:28:35.05 -12:15:25.0: 13.44 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:28:35.05 -12:15:25.0: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7424 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:57:50.55 -14:06:13.1: 13.39 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:35:11.07 -06:40:08.3: 13.48 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.49 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:35:11.07 -06:40:08.3: ref_mag=13.49 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7292 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:23:53.62 -07:32:25.1: 13.54 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:57:50.55 -14:06:13.1: 13.36 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.37 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:57:50.55 -14:06:13.1: ref_mag=13.37 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4571 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:29:54.14 -10:37:03.0: 13.35 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:23:53.62 -07:32:25.1: 13.54 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:23:53.62 -07:32:25.1: ref_mag=13.54 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6995 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:18:57.67 -11:12:08.6: 13.32 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:19:54.38 -07:04:20.7: 13.02 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:29:54.14 -10:37:03.0: 13.29 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:24:24.25 -13:40:38.3: 13.05 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.32 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:29:54.14 -10:37:03.0: ref_mag=13.32 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5138 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:19:53.11 -11:39:30.6: 12.94 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:18:57.67 -11:12:08.6: 13.23 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.27 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:18:57.67 -11:12:08.6: ref_mag=13.27 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3971 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:19:54.38 -07:04:20.7: 13.04 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.03 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:19:54.38 -07:04:20.7: ref_mag=13.03 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3260 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:24:24.25 -13:40:38.3: 13.13 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:19:53.11 -11:39:30.6: 12.92 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:28:40.60 -08:36:39.4: 12.91 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.93 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.09 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:19:53.11 -11:39:30.6: ref_mag=12.93 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1992 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:24:24.25 -13:40:38.3: ref_mag=13.09 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1592 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:30:48.83 -08:50:40.7: 12.97 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:20:49.53 -10:49:39.4: 12.84 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:15:22.18 -11:54:16.5: 12.97 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:21:56.93 -12:20:51.1: 12.79 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:28:40.60 -08:36:39.4: 12.99 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.94 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:28:40.60 -08:36:39.4: ref_mag=12.94 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1637 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:30:48.83 -08:50:40.7: 12.96 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.96 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:30:48.83 -08:50:40.7: ref_mag=12.96 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0359 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:15:22.18 -11:54:16.5: 12.90 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.93 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:15:22.18 -11:54:16.5: ref_mag=12.93 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0165 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:21:56.93 -12:20:51.1: 12.79 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.79 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:21:56.93 -12:20:51.1: ref_mag=12.79 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7907 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:20:49.53 -10:49:39.4: 12.83 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.84 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:20:49.53 -10:49:39.4: ref_mag=12.84 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9965 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:17:16.65 -07:15:52.1: 12.64 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:23:13.95 -07:12:39.6: 12.72 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:22:46.51 -07:22:29.7: 12.22 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:38:59.33 -07:23:59.0: 10.10 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:24:48.65 -08:29:42.6: 12.16 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:23:13.95 -07:12:39.6: 12.58 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:17:16.65 -07:15:52.1: 12.52 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.64 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:23:13.95 -07:12:39.6: ref_mag=12.64 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7756 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.57 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:17:16.65 -07:15:52.1: ref_mag=12.57 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7702 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:22:46.51 -07:22:29.7: 12.24 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.23 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:22:46.51 -07:22:29.7: ref_mag=12.23 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5660 delta=-0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:38:59.33 -07:23:59.0: 10.09 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.10 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:38:59.33 -07:23:59.0: ref_mag=10.10 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.3605 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:24:48.65 -08:29:42.6: 12.16 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.16 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:24:48.65 -08:29:42.6: ref_mag=12.16 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5541 delta=-0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:52:55.31 -06:15:53.7: 15.58 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:52:55.31 -06:15:53.7: 15.58 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:19:06.93 -13:20:58.3: 13.37 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:20:11.09 -13:17:33.7: 13.58 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:19:06.93 -13:20:58.3: 13.45 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.41 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:19:06.93 -13:20:58.3: ref_mag=13.41 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.3578 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:32:09.06 -11:17:58.3: 13.83 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:16:23.38 -09:09:03.0: 15.34 +/- 0.35 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:26:42.74 -07:44:01.3: 13.60 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:25:58.91 -11:16:32.1: 13.76 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:20:11.09 -13:17:33.7: 13.70 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:20:11.09 -13:17:33.7: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.5912 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:17:43.93 -08:48:48.6: 14.25 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:32:09.06 -11:17:58.3: 13.96 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:26:42.74 -07:44:01.3: 13.65 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.89 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:32:09.06 -11:17:58.3: ref_mag=13.89 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.8009 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.63 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:26:42.74 -07:44:01.3: ref_mag=13.63 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.7070 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:25:58.91 -11:16:32.1: 13.68 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:16:23.38 -09:09:03.0: 15.34 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.72 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.34 +/- 0.35
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:25:58.91 -11:16:32.1: ref_mag=13.72 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.7524 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:16:23.38 -09:09:03.0: ref_mag=15.34 +/- 0.35 new_mean_mag=13.8968 delta=1.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:17:43.93 -08:48:48.6: 14.38 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.30 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:17:43.93 -08:48:48.6: ref_mag=14.30 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.0822 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:25:20.64 -05:59:41.6: 14.18 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:16:02.10 -09:48:21.2: 14.26 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:35:29.16 -08:41:04.0: 14.20 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:25:20.64 -05:59:41.6: 14.37 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.25 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:25:20.64 -05:59:41.6: ref_mag=14.25 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.1877 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:30:08.70 -11:22:27.4: 14.36 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:24:41.78 -12:08:34.7: 14.29 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:16:02.10 -09:48:21.2: 14.20 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:24:38.36 -07:52:25.1: 14.55 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.23 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:45:01.07 -07:43:31.6: 14.05 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:16:02.10 -09:48:21.2: ref_mag=14.23 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.1000 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:35:29.16 -08:41:04.0: 14.24 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.22 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:35:29.16 -08:41:04.0: ref_mag=14.22 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.1130 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:26:35.06 -08:32:53.5: 14.43 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:30:08.70 -11:22:27.4: 14.31 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.33 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:30:08.70 -11:22:27.4: ref_mag=14.33 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.2666 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:24:38.36 -07:52:25.1: 14.43 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.48 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:45:01.07 -07:43:31.6: 14.15 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:24:38.36 -07:52:25.1: ref_mag=14.48 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.1902 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.10 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:45:01.07 -07:43:31.6: ref_mag=14.10 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.1575 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:24:41.78 -12:08:34.7: 14.46 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.37 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:24:41.78 -12:08:34.7: ref_mag=14.37 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.1811 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:26:35.06 -08:32:53.5: 14.75 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.54 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:26:35.06 -08:32:53.5: ref_mag=14.54 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.3193 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:47:06.44 -08:52:46.0: 15.26 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:26:00.24 -05:44:20.7: 14.34 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:17:38.94 -06:34:53.2: 14.65 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:20:02.55 -11:17:33.1: 14.39 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:26:00.24 -05:44:20.7: 14.30 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:36:08.44 -11:49:29.9: 14.40 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:17:38.94 -06:34:53.2: 14.45 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.32 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:26:00.24 -05:44:20.7: ref_mag=14.32 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.2851 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.53 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:20:02.55 -11:17:33.1: 14.48 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:17:38.94 -06:34:53.2: ref_mag=14.53 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.1632 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:37:46.21 -07:05:51.5: 14.73 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.43 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:20:02.55 -11:17:33.1: ref_mag=14.43 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.3685 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:47:06.44 -08:52:46.0: 15.06 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.14 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:47:06.44 -08:52:46.0: ref_mag=15.14 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.3138 delta=0.82 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:23:14.56 -10:05:02.9: 14.44 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:26:36.20 -08:46:01.0: 14.69 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:41:02.19 -08:15:12.9: 14.58 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:36:08.44 -11:49:29.9: 14.42 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.41 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:36:08.44 -11:49:29.9: ref_mag=14.41 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.2952 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:37:46.21 -07:05:51.5: 14.72 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:37:46.21 -07:05:51.5: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.3169 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:23:14.56 -10:05:02.9: 14.55 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.49 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:23:14.56 -10:05:02.9: ref_mag=14.49 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.2410 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:26:36.20 -08:46:01.0: 14.73 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.71 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:26:36.20 -08:46:01.0: ref_mag=14.71 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5136 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:41:02.19 -08:15:12.9: 14.88 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:41:02.19 -08:15:12.9: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4865 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:38:17.02 -06:31:55.9: 14.60 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:38:17.02 -06:31:55.9: 14.76 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.66 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:38:17.02 -06:31:55.9: ref_mag=14.66 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5454 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:18:49.19 -13:06:39.8: 14.18 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:20:35.02 -11:51:11.8: 14.15 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-24-55_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 19:16:06.27 -10:32:30.6: 13.71 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:18:49.19 -13:06:39.8: 14.22 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.20 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:18:49.19 -13:06:39.8: ref_mag=14.20 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.0910 delta=1.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:20:35.02 -11:51:11.8: 13.91 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.01 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:20:35.02 -11:51:11.8: ref_mag=14.01 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.0128 delta=0.99 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-13_01-25-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0043.fits at 19:16:06.27 -10:32:30.6: 13.91 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:16:06.27 -10:32:30.6: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=12.8393 delta=0.95 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out175515.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out175447.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out23686.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out41033.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out61031.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 14s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 5s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175190_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 175190_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175196_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 175196_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175203_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 175203_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175219_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 175219_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175237_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 175237_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175239_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 175239_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175240_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 175240_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175242_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 175242_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175262_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 175262_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175265_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 175265_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175278_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 175278_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175285_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 175285_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175288_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 175288_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175310_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 175310_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175312_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 175312_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175317_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 175317_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175318_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 175318_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:18:33.81 -06:01:22.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175326_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 175326_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175329_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 175329_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:25:59.86 -09:28:14.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175340_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 175340_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175342_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 175342_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:56:30.40 -07:39:10.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175348_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 175348_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175350_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 175350_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:32:59.35 -08:31:54.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175354_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 175354_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175356_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 175356_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175358_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 175358_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:29:39.05 -12:01:17.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175369_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 175369_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175384_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 175384_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175386_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 175386_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:15:50.50 -08:18:21.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175392_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 175392_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:16:49.26 -09:43:50.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175397_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 175397_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175398_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 175398_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:23:59.65 -06:02:04.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175401_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 175401_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175403_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 175403_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175406_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 175406_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175408_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 175408_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175409_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 175409_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175411_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 175411_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175414_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 175414_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175416_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 175416_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175418_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 175418_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175421_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 175421_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175424_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 175424_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175434_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 175434_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175437_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 175437_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:34:39.93 -07:34:19.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175438_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 175438_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:20:33.71 -09:51:17.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175442_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 175442_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:29:28.40 -07:03:02.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175447_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045
Preparing report for the candidate 175447_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175461_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 175461_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:16:16.58 -13:24:42.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175462_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 175462_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:16:23.99 -08:41:30.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175474_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 175474_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175484_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 175484_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:35:13.61 -10:34:25.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175489_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 175489_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175491_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 175491_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:17:29.96 -09:59:30.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175493_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 175493_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:26:25.83 -14:06:22.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175500_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 175500_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:54:57.37 -07:02:28.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175502_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 175502_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175504_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 175504_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175508_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 175508_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175515_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 175515_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:16:23.38 -09:09:03.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.90, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.88)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.926 4201008259288579456 289.09733782017 -09.15058802996 13.5449 11.5587 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.926#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175517_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 175517_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:45:47.42 -08:00:28.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175527_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 175527_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:00:20.93 -08:57:27.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175539_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 175539_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175551_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 175551_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175560_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 175560_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:26:55.66 -05:48:50.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175562_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 175562_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175571_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 175571_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175586_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 175586_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175602_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 175602_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175604_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 175604_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175609_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 175609_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175611_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 175611_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175614_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 175614_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175615_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 175615_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175617_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 175617_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175630_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 175630_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175641_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 175641_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175643_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 175643_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175665_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 175665_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175667_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 175667_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175712_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 175712_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175730_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 175730_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101359_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 101359_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:50:06.13 -07:36:55.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137327_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 137327_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:43:12.89 -07:31:07.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 123905_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 123905_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:48:18.57 -06:26:33.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129394_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 129394_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:19:29.81 -06:50:10.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 165671_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 165671_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:16:39.10 -08:55:41.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91658_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 91658_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:33:06.07 -08:41:44.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173429_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 173429_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:57:18.87 -09:19:21.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 44863_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 44863_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:26:33.21 -11:37:51.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89789_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 89789_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:35:45.73 -08:48:14.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23686_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045
Preparing report for the candidate 23686_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 41033_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045
Preparing report for the candidate 41033_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75305_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 75305_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:20:21.32 -09:39:45.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33784_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 33784_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:44:39.57 -12:24:02.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125795_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 125795_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:26:11.00 -06:34:35.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61031_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045
Preparing report for the candidate 61031_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55913_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045
The candidate 55913_fd_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-08-04_22-14-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0045 did not pass the final checks