This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052435_TTUQ1b1x1_1001970_3tkvusfQ
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 04.4331 2461256.9331 8.66 05:23:20.63 -04:34:14.0
206.78482 -21.65449 galactic Ori Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 8.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" V0535 Ori
Type: LB
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
10.900 B 11.600 B 2454179.90000 428.000000000000 M6
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 05:23:20.63 -04:34:14.0: 9.64 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 05:23:20.63 -04:34:14.0: 9.62 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.63 +/- 0.00
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 04.4331* 05 23 20.63 -04 34 14.0 8.7 U Ori 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V0535 Ori,2461256.9331,8.66,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V0535 Ori 20260804.4331 8.66CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 04.4331 2461256.9331 11.53 04:53:05.83 -01:10:43.8
199.55436 -26.65969 galactic Ori Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 8.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" FW Ori
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.660 V Y 0.590 V 2452150.70000 216.165892000000 M7
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 04:53:05.83 -01:10:43.8: 12.51 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 04:53:05.83 -01:10:43.8: 12.58 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.55 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 04.4331* 04 53 05.83 -01 10 43.8 11.5 U Ori 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
FW Ori,2461256.9331,11.53,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
FW Ori 20260804.4331 11.53CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 04.4331 2461256.9331 11.40 05:20:34.42 +01:34:35.2
200.66418 -19.32994 galactic Ori Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 8.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J052034.35+013435.3
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.210 g Y 0.360 g 2459196.93900 525.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 05:20:34.42 +01:34:35.2: 12.33 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 05:20:34.42 +01:34:35.2: 12.27 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.30 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 04.4331* 05 20 34.42 +01 34 35.2 11.4 U Ori 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J052034.35+013435.3,2461256.9331,11.40,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J052034.35+013435.3 20260804.4331 11.40CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 04.4331 2461256.9331 10.92 05:32:44.47 -03:50:29.8
207.24590 -19.23905 galactic Ori Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.7" and 8.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" ASASSN-V J053244.44-035029.7
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.740 V 13.010 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 05:32:44.47 -03:50:29.8: 11.80 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 05:32:44.47 -03:50:29.8: 11.83 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.82 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 04.4331* 05 32 44.47 -03 50 29.8 10.9 U Ori 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J053244.44-035029.7,2461256.9331,10.92,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J053244.44-035029.7 20260804.4331 10.92CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 04.4331 2461256.9331 10.77 05:12:28.80 -02:33:31.2
203.48892 -23.10632 galactic Ori Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 8.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASAS J051229-0233.5
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.940 V Y 0.380 V 2452336.80000 168.000000000000 M5/6
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 05:12:28.80 -02:33:31.2: 11.68 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 05:12:28.80 -02:33:31.2: 11.69 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.69 +/- 0.00
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 04.4331* 05 12 28.80 -02 33 31.2 10.8 U Ori 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J051229-0233.5,2461256.9331,10.77,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J051229-0233.5 20260804.4331 10.77CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 04.4331 2461256.9331 10.04 05:37:38.35 -01:46:17.3
205.91366 -17.19456 galactic Ori Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 8.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" X Ori
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.400 pg < 15.500 pg 2443451.00000 422.200000000000 M9
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 05:37:38.35 -01:46:17.3: 11.12 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 05:37:38.35 -01:46:17.3: 11.12 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.12 +/- 0.00
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 04.4331* 05 37 38.35 -01 46 17.3 10.0 U Ori 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
X Ori,2461256.9331,10.04,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
X Ori 20260804.4331 10.04CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.68062513 09.01.2026 04:19:56.011 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits
First image: 2461049.68062513 09.01.2026 04:19:56.011 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits
Last image: 2461256.93339471 04.08.2026 10:23:55.303 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052435_TTUQ1b1x1_1001970_3tkvusfQ/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 7
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.70
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 13541
Objects passed selection criteria: 13442
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.3 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.3 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 8191.25
Average stars matched: 7823.75 (95.5135 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 239212 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jul 29 18:03:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-187-gf9db235a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-29)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Aug 4 05:26:22 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.68062513 09.01.2026 04:19:56.011 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits
First image: 2461049.68062513 09.01.2026 04:19:56.011 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits
Last image: 2461256.93339471 04.08.2026 10:23:55.303 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052435_TTUQ1b1x1_1001970_3tkvusfQ/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 55
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.39
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 12 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 80542
Objects passed selection criteria: 80256
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.3 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.3 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 50298.8
Average stars matched: 48589 (96.6008 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 299620 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jul 29 18:03:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-187-gf9db235a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-29)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Aug 4 05:27:09 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052435_TTUQ1b1x1_1001970_3tkvusfQ/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052435_TTUQ1b1x1_1001970_3tkvusfQ/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052435_TTUQ1b1x1_1001970_3tkvusfQ/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052435_TTUQ1b1x1_1001970_3tkvusfQ/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461256.93275463
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits'
wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits'
wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits'
wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:08:40.804 -01:58:40.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits
Image size: 944.9'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:08:45.204 -02:01:43.39 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:08:40.804 -01:58:40.82
Second-epoch image center 05:08:45.204 -02:01:43.39
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0539 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
Image size: 944.8'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:08:47.868 -02:01:10.72 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:08:40.804 -01:58:40.82
Second-epoch image center 05:08:47.868 -02:01:10.72
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0510 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:08:45.204 -02:01:43.39
Second-epoch second image center 05:08:47.868 -02:01:10.72
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01433 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits &> /tmp/tmp.md6qzkIJDQ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8vHt3rU6tc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052435_TTUQ1b1x1_1001970_3tkvusfQ/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7mgpQ00X7e
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052435_TTUQ1b1x1_1001970_3tkvusfQ/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052435_TTUQ1b1x1_1001970_3tkvusfQ/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Q86DaDckGZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052435_TTUQ1b1x1_1001970_3tkvusfQ/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits and wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits and wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits and wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits) and catalog (wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 14462 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 69.2579 to 85.1125 deg, Dec -7.2867 to +3.3458 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 69.2579 to 85.1125 deg, Dec -7.2867 to 3.3458 deg
Loaded 9341 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7410 out of 7991 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7991 out of 14462 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.914450
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.914450
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.70
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.21
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.21
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 14462 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 69.2579 to 85.1125 deg, Dec -7.2867 to +3.3458 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 69.2579 to 85.1125 deg, Dec -7.2867 to 3.3458 deg
Loaded 9341 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7410 out of 7991 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7991 out of 14462 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 14502 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 69.2668 to 85.1125 deg, Dec -7.2839 to +3.3517 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 69.2668 to 85.1125 deg, Dec -7.2839 to 3.3517 deg
Loaded 9336 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7412 out of 7981 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7981 out of 14502 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 7 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits
2.1 pix Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
2.5 pix fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits
2.5 pix fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits
15.2 mag. Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
11.6 mag. fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits
11.8 mag. fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 11.6 (SNR ) 9.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.md6qzkIJDQ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-04_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052435_TTUQ1b1x1_1001970_3tkvusfQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits' -> 'wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1502, bad_region=0, passed=14462
Got 14462 stars (including 12945 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14462 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4867 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4840 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4840 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4840 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14462 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4867 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4840 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14462 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4840 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14462 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4840 stars left (next iteration limit 5324)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits N_match=4840 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.425 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.289 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.290 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.258 n_q1=1034 n_q2=1167 n_q3=1067 n_q4=1572 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.416
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits -region wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.8vHt3rU6tc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-04_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052435_TTUQ1b1x1_1001970_3tkvusfQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits' -> 'wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=1458, bad_region=0, passed=14500
Got 14500 stars (including 13020 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14500 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4865 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4840 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4840 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4840 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14500 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4865 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4840 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14500 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4840 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14500 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4840 stars left (next iteration limit 5324)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits N_match=4840 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.289 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.281 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.268 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.250 n_q1=1037 n_q2=1174 n_q3=1068 n_q4=1561 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.333
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits -region wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.7mgpQ00X7e (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-04_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052435_TTUQ1b1x1_1001970_3tkvusfQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052435_TTUQ1b1x1_1001970_3tkvusfQ/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052435_TTUQ1b1x1_1001970_3tkvusfQ/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052435_TTUQ1b1x1_1001970_3tkvusfQ/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052435_TTUQ1b1x1_1001970_3tkvusfQ/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052435_TTUQ1b1x1_1001970_3tkvusfQ/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052435_TTUQ1b1x1_1001970_3tkvusfQ/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052435_TTUQ1b1x1_1001970_3tkvusfQ/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=138, bad_region=0, passed=2014
Got 2014 stars (including 1875 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2014 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013124 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010499 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 412 to 469 (Dec -7.6 to 3.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 1749 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1730 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1726 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1730 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2007 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 412 to 469 (Dec -7.6 to 3.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 1751 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1729 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2009 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1729 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2009 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 1729 stars left (next iteration limit 1903)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=1729 robust_rms=9.039 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.768 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=1729 robust_rms=0.559 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.844 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=1729 robust_rms=0.480 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.697 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=1729 robust_rms_before=1.254 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.466 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.480 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.771 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.697
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.771 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits N_match=1729 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.463 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.440 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.777 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.526 n_q1=452 n_q2=306 n_q3=507 n_q4=464 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.679
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052435_TTUQ1b1x1_1001970_3tkvusfQ/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits -region wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Q86DaDckGZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-04_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052435_TTUQ1b1x1_1001970_3tkvusfQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052435_TTUQ1b1x1_1001970_3tkvusfQ/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052435_TTUQ1b1x1_1001970_3tkvusfQ/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052435_TTUQ1b1x1_1001970_3tkvusfQ/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052435_TTUQ1b1x1_1001970_3tkvusfQ/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052435_TTUQ1b1x1_1001970_3tkvusfQ/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052435_TTUQ1b1x1_1001970_3tkvusfQ/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052435_TTUQ1b1x1_1001970_3tkvusfQ/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=135, bad_region=0, passed=2037
Got 2037 stars (including 1902 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2037 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013122 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010498 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 412 to 469 (Dec -7.5 to 3.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 1772 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1752 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1748 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1752 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2031 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 412 to 469 (Dec -7.5 to 3.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 1773 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1751 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2032 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1751 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2032 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 1751 stars left (next iteration limit 1927)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=1751 robust_rms=8.956 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.591 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=1751 robust_rms=0.582 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=1.043 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=1751 robust_rms=0.495 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.689 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=1751 robust_rms_before=1.324 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.463 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.495 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.782 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.689
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
Image size: 945.0'x627.0' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:08:47.959 -02:01:12.00 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 2037 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-04_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052435_TTUQ1b1x1_1001970_3tkvusfQ/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1018135.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 1.324 -> 0.495 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits N_match=1751 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.545 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.624 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.755 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.591 n_q1=447 n_q2=309 n_q3=515 n_q4=480 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.385
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052435_TTUQ1b1x1_1001970_3tkvusfQ/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits -region wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits sigma_overall=0.300 worst_q_ratio=1.416
ref2=Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits sigma_overall=0.289 worst_q_ratio=1.333
new1=fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits sigma_overall=0.463 worst_q_ratio=1.679
new2=fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits sigma_overall=0.545 worst_q_ratio=1.385
reference average sigma_overall=0.2945 worst_q_ratio=1.3745
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149_astrometric_residuals.png (4840 matched stars from wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150_astrometric_residuals.png (4840 matched stars from wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0464_astrometric_residuals.png (1729 matched stars from wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.41 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465_astrometric_residuals.png (1751 matched stars from wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.40 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052435_TTUQ1b1x1_1001970_3tkvusfQ/wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052435_TTUQ1b1x1_1001970_3tkvusfQ/wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Ori-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20872_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 20872_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:01.04 -06:00:30.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20905_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 20905_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:00.36 -00:17:04.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20932_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 20932_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:26.28 -05:24:56.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20934_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 20934_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:47.19 -02:35:39.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20958_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 20958_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:31.18 -05:16:01.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 00893_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 00893_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:56:51.94 -06:32:07.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02874_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 02874_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:00.79 -04:41:32.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Ori-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052435_TTUQ1b1x1_1001970_3tkvusfQ/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052435_TTUQ1b1x1_1001970_3tkvusfQ/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052435_TTUQ1b1x1_1001970_3tkvusfQ/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052435_TTUQ1b1x1_1001970_3tkvusfQ/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:08:40.804 -01:58:40.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits
Image size: 944.9'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:08:45.204 -02:01:43.39 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:08:40.804 -01:58:40.82
Second-epoch image center 05:08:45.204 -02:01:43.39
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0539 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
Image size: 944.8'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:08:47.868 -02:01:10.72 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:08:40.804 -01:58:40.82
Second-epoch image center 05:08:47.868 -02:01:10.72
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0510 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:08:45.204 -02:01:43.39
Second-epoch second image center 05:08:47.868 -02:01:10.72
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01433 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WGL7HsXnjc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bxsALj4UmR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052435_TTUQ1b1x1_1001970_3tkvusfQ/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YahKPCjGC7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052435_TTUQ1b1x1_1001970_3tkvusfQ/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052435_TTUQ1b1x1_1001970_3tkvusfQ/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cyqiPrMssk
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052435_TTUQ1b1x1_1001970_3tkvusfQ/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits and wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits and wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits and wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits) and catalog (wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 88009 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 69.2553 to 85.1209 deg, Dec -7.2903 to +3.3492 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 69.2553 to 85.1209 deg, Dec -7.2903 to 3.3492 deg
Loaded 9351 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6693 out of 8153 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8153 out of 88009 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.793300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.793300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.39
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.40
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.40
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 88009 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 69.2553 to 85.1209 deg, Dec -7.2903 to +3.3492 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 69.2553 to 85.1209 deg, Dec -7.2903 to 3.3492 deg
Loaded 9351 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6693 out of 8153 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8153 out of 88009 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 87280 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 69.2650 to 85.1364 deg, Dec -7.2838 to +3.3548 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 69.2650 to 85.1364 deg, Dec -7.2838 to 3.3548 deg
Loaded 9349 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6671 out of 8129 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8129 out of 87280 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 54 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits
1.9 pix Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
2.5 pix fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits
2.5 pix fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits
15.4 mag. Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
12.5 mag. fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits
12.6 mag. fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 12.5 (SNR ) 12.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.WGL7HsXnjc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-04_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052435_TTUQ1b1x1_1001970_3tkvusfQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits' -> 'wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=34, blended=6760, bad_region=5, passed=87975
Got 87975 stars (including 81061 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 87975 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4846 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4846 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4846 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 87975 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4846 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 87975 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4846 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 87975 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4846 stars left (next iteration limit 5330)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits N_match=4846 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.293 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.284 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.272 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.261 n_q1=1049 n_q2=1179 n_q3=1077 n_q4=1541 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.334
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits -region wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.bxsALj4UmR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-04_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052435_TTUQ1b1x1_1001970_3tkvusfQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits' -> 'wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=26, blended=6799, bad_region=6, passed=87254
Got 87254 stars (including 80312 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 87254 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4862 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4844 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 87254 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4862 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 87254 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 87254 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 4844 stars left (next iteration limit 5328)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits N_match=4844 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.269 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.267 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.244 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.238 n_q1=1069 n_q2=1191 n_q3=1069 n_q4=1515 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.334
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits -region wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.YahKPCjGC7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-04_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052435_TTUQ1b1x1_1001970_3tkvusfQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052435_TTUQ1b1x1_1001970_3tkvusfQ/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052435_TTUQ1b1x1_1001970_3tkvusfQ/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052435_TTUQ1b1x1_1001970_3tkvusfQ/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052435_TTUQ1b1x1_1001970_3tkvusfQ/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052435_TTUQ1b1x1_1001970_3tkvusfQ/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052435_TTUQ1b1x1_1001970_3tkvusfQ/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052435_TTUQ1b1x1_1001970_3tkvusfQ/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=1, blended=299, bad_region=2, passed=13589
Got 13589 stars (including 13271 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13589 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013124 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010499 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4794 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4756 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4757 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4756 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13589 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4794 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4757 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13589 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4757 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13589 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 4757 stars left (next iteration limit 5231)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits N_match=4757 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.475 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.492 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.662 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.497 n_q1=1227 n_q2=753 n_q3=1429 n_q4=1348 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.393
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052435_TTUQ1b1x1_1001970_3tkvusfQ/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits -region wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.cyqiPrMssk (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-04_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052435_TTUQ1b1x1_1001970_3tkvusfQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052435_TTUQ1b1x1_1001970_3tkvusfQ/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052435_TTUQ1b1x1_1001970_3tkvusfQ/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052435_TTUQ1b1x1_1001970_3tkvusfQ/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052435_TTUQ1b1x1_1001970_3tkvusfQ/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052435_TTUQ1b1x1_1001970_3tkvusfQ/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052435_TTUQ1b1x1_1001970_3tkvusfQ/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052435_TTUQ1b1x1_1001970_3tkvusfQ/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=290, bad_region=2, passed=13755
Got 13755 stars (including 13446 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13755 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013122 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010498 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4802 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4768 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4767 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4768 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13754 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4802 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13755 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13755 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 4766 stars left (next iteration limit 5244)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits N_match=4766 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.472 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.466 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.679 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.489 n_q1=1227 n_q2=766 n_q3=1410 n_q4=1363 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.439
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052435_TTUQ1b1x1_1001970_3tkvusfQ/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits -region wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052435_TTUQ1b1x1_1001970_3tkvusfQ/wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0464.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_052435_TTUQ1b1x1_1001970_3tkvusfQ/wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Ori-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 05:23:20.63 -04:34:14.0: 9.64 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 05:32:44.47 -03:50:29.8: 11.80 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 05:20:34.42 +01:34:35.2: 12.33 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 04:53:05.83 -01:10:43.8: 12.51 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 05:37:38.35 -01:46:17.3: 11.12 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0149.fits at 05:12:28.80 -02:33:31.2: 11.68 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 05:32:44.47 -03:50:29.8: 11.83 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 04:53:05.83 -01:10:43.8: 12.58 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 05:37:38.35 -01:46:17.3: 11.12 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 05:23:20.63 -04:34:14.0: 9.62 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 05:12:28.80 -02:33:31.2: 11.69 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-21-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 05:20:34.42 +01:34:35.2: 12.27 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.82 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:32:44.47 -03:50:29.8: ref_mag=11.82 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.9111 delta=0.90 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.55 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.12 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:53:05.83 -01:10:43.8: ref_mag=12.55 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5236 delta=1.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.30 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.63 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:37:38.35 -01:46:17.3: ref_mag=11.12 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.0314 delta=1.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.69 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:20:34.42 +01:34:35.2: ref_mag=12.30 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.3770 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:23:20.63 -04:34:14.0: ref_mag=9.63 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=8.6605 delta=0.97 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:12:28.80 -02:33:31.2: ref_mag=11.69 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.7629 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out16622.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out22851.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out33747.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out39555.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out46491.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out74207.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 5s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104432_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 104432_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:01.11 -06:00:31.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104437_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 104437_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:00.41 -00:17:04.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104442_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 104442_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:47.21 -02:35:39.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104523_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 104523_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:28.14 -05:26:12.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104541_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 104541_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:34.59 -02:22:37.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104616_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 104616_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:50.48 -05:28:32.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104618_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 104618_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:00.23 -05:25:17.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104627_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 104627_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:22.93 -01:10:31.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104649_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 104649_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:22.79 -02:25:54.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104700_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 104700_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:13:22.93 +02:53:50.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08141_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 08141_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:22.81 -05:24:53.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16622_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
Preparing report for the candidate 16622_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46491_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
Preparing report for the candidate 46491_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74207_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
Preparing report for the candidate 74207_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02395_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 02395_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:55:23.96 -06:55:49.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22851_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
Preparing report for the candidate 22851_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03879_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 03879_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:21:32.94 -06:35:48.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33747_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
Preparing report for the candidate 33747_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06538_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 06538_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:59.55 -06:07:00.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39555_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
Preparing report for the candidate 39555_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04561_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 04561_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:56:51.94 -06:32:07.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15970_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 15970_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:00.77 -04:41:32.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33307_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 33307_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:11:19.23 -02:29:27.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64879_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 64879_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:14:36.95 -00:33:47.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18230_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 18230_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:08:43.80 -04:27:20.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20137_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 20137_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:02:45.57 -04:12:35.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16835_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 16835_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:45.70 -04:39:16.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13214_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 13214_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:50.85 -05:05:11.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76341_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 76341_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:23.76 +01:10:36.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33633_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 33633_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:28.36 -02:23:50.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87010_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 87010_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:21:45.56 -00:22:58.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03543_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 03543_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:16.13 -05:23:18.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 47431_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 47431_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:28.78 -00:53:26.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07162_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 07162_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:12:48.12 -06:03:25.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13195_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 13195_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:56:24.28 -05:10:15.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72714_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 72714_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:58:33.01 +01:42:46.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52381_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 52381_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:13:17.44 +02:51:36.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84665_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 84665_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:37.95 +00:00:43.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25495_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 25495_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:23.59 -03:26:47.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01409_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 01409_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:36.23 -06:50:37.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 45231_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 45231_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:43.81 -01:05:33.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06776_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 06776_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:26.13 -05:54:35.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06537_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 06537_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:02.72 -06:00:06.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64473_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 64473_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:00.17 -00:17:58.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14577_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 14577_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:22.98 -04:50:15.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 42057_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 42057_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:03.95 -01:28:14.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11201_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 11201_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:52:53.79 -05:27:07.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55172_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 55172_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:11.14 +02:35:42.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 41269_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 41269_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:41.31 -01:35:30.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 44917_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 44917_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:31.39 -01:09:22.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14177_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 14177_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:39.32 -04:51:18.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 43486_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 43486_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:12.62 -01:12:08.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31849_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 31849_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:44.79 -02:35:59.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72128_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465
The candidate 72128_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_05-23-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0465 did not pass the final checks
