FITS images used in this processing run:

Field Aur-02-Q1b1x1 reference image: Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-33-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits
Field Aur-02-Q1b1x1 reference image: Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-34-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
Field Aur-02-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-00-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits
Field Aur-02-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-01-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits

## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461058.73146802 18.01.2026 05:33:08.837   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-33-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits
First image: 2461058.73146802 18.01.2026 05:33:08.837   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-33-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits
Last  image: 2461256.87603653 04.08.2026 09:01:19.556   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_044916_TTUQ1b1x1_297017_jxiaH2Cy/fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-01-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 6
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.57
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 7 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  10.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     55000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.37            # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  24013
Objects passed selection criteria:  23817
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    2.1    2.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    2.1    2.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 13664.2
Average stars matched: 13233.2 (96.8458 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   248612 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Wed Jul 29 18:03:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-187-gf9db235a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-29)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Tue Aug  4 04:51:52 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
WARNING: VaST exited with code 1 on the field Aur-02-Q1b1x1 after completing the measurements (memory cleanup crash); the transient search continues.
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 2
Ref.  image: 2461058.73146802 18.01.2026 05:33:08.837   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-33-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits
First image: 2461058.73146802 18.01.2026 05:33:08.837   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-33-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits
Last  image: 2461058.73220126 18.01.2026 05:34:12.189   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-34-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.27
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 17 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  2.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     57000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.83            # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  161843
Objects passed selection criteria:  161107
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    2.0    2.0    2    2
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    2.0    2.0    2    2
Average stars detected per image: 177514
Average stars matched: 169961 (95.7449 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   620332 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Wed Jul 29 18:03:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-187-gf9db235a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-29)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Tue Aug  4 04:52:44 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
***** IMAGE PROCESSING ERROR (less than 4 images processed) *****
############################################################

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Aur-02-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Aur-02-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Aur-02-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 159848 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 159848 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-33-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-34-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 

Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:

MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes


renamed 'Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-00-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.png' -> 'transient_report/Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-00-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits_preview.png'

Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-00-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits


renamed 'Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-01-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.png' -> 'transient_report/Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-01-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits_preview.png'

Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-01-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits




Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 506.1438
INFO:         REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 750.8336
INFO:    SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 4805.7221
INFO:            SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 979.3725
INFO:   SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 4794.3272
INFO:           SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 977.5305
----------------------------------------------
INFO:      ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 9.49478
INFO:                  SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.002
INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_044916_TTUQ1b1x1_297017_jxiaH2Cy/Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-00-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits 
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_044916_TTUQ1b1x1_297017_jxiaH2Cy/Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-00-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_044916_TTUQ1b1x1_297017_jxiaH2Cy/Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-00-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits
Header: 67 keys total, 4 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-04T04:00:19.3753058' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-04T09:00:19.3753058' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61256.3752242476 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-04T09:00:29.2794596' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61256.3753388771 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =      89.996141271066 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =     45.9998433300312 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     14.8705555555556 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     44.1355555555556 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     3.84197232724221 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =     33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=    -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'Aur-02'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '06 00 00'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+46 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                29525 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                29525 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 56: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 57: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 58: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 59: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 60: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 61: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 62: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 63: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 64: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_044916_TTUQ1b1x1_297017_jxiaH2Cy/Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-00-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_044916_TTUQ1b1x1_297017_jxiaH2Cy/Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-00-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_044916_TTUQ1b1x1_297017_jxiaH2Cy/Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-00-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_044916_TTUQ1b1x1_297017_jxiaH2Cy/d_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-00-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits :)

Spent 0.467400 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_044916_TTUQ1b1x1_297017_jxiaH2Cy/d_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-00-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 26658.571233
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_044916_TTUQ1b1x1_297017_jxiaH2Cy/fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-00-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=17308.5, right_median=19900.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_044916_TTUQ1b1x1_297017_jxiaH2Cy/fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-00-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_044916_TTUQ1b1x1_297017_jxiaH2Cy/Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-01-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits 
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_044916_TTUQ1b1x1_297017_jxiaH2Cy/Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-01-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_044916_TTUQ1b1x1_297017_jxiaH2Cy/Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-01-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits
Header: 67 keys total, 4 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-04T04:01:19.5569966' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-04T09:01:19.5569966' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =      61256.375920787 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-04T09:01:29.4574952' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =      61256.376035382 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     89.9961411912392 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =     45.9998433539007 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     15.0161111111111 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =               44.235 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     3.80666356421138 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =     33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=    -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'Aur-02'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '06 00 00'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+46 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                29525 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                29525 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 56: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 57: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 58: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 59: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 60: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 61: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 62: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 63: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 64: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_044916_TTUQ1b1x1_297017_jxiaH2Cy/Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-01-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_044916_TTUQ1b1x1_297017_jxiaH2Cy/Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-01-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_044916_TTUQ1b1x1_297017_jxiaH2Cy/Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-01-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_044916_TTUQ1b1x1_297017_jxiaH2Cy/d_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-01-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits :)

Spent 0.461011 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_044916_TTUQ1b1x1_297017_jxiaH2Cy/d_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-01-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 26658.571233
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_044916_TTUQ1b1x1_297017_jxiaH2Cy/fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-01-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=17308.5, right_median=19900.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_044916_TTUQ1b1x1_297017_jxiaH2Cy/fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-01-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_044916_TTUQ1b1x1_297017_jxiaH2Cy/fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-00-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_044916_TTUQ1b1x1_297017_jxiaH2Cy/fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-01-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:


fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-00-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits



fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-01-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits




Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1

  ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-33-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-34-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_044916_TTUQ1b1x1_297017_jxiaH2Cy/fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-00-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_044916_TTUQ1b1x1_297017_jxiaH2Cy/fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-01-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-33-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-34-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-33-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-34-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_044916_TTUQ1b1x1_297017_jxiaH2Cy/fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-00-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_044916_TTUQ1b1x1_297017_jxiaH2Cy/fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-01-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461256.87533999
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-33-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-33-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-33-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-33-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits'
wcs_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-34-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-34-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-34-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-34-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits'
wcs_fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-00-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-00-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-00-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-00-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits'
wcs_fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-01-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-01-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-01-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-01-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-33-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-33-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.2'  15.7(deg)x10.5(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:01.162 +45:59:30.64 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-00-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-00-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits
Image size: 945.0'x626.9'  15.8(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:00.317 +46:00:55.93 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:00:01.162 +45:59:30.64
Second-epoch image center 06:00:00.317 +46:00:55.93
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0238 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-01-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-01-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits
Image size: 944.9'x626.9'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:59:57.956 +46:00:24.72 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:00:01.162 +45:59:30.64
Second-epoch image center 05:59:57.956 +46:00:24.72
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0177 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  06:00:00.317 +46:00:55.93
Second-epoch second image center 05:59:57.956 +46:00:24.72
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01104 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-33-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits &> /tmp/tmp.R96tSciSle
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-33-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-34-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lIGRqw7LXj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-34-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_044916_TTUQ1b1x1_297017_jxiaH2Cy/fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-00-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9rNrDvBUbz
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_044916_TTUQ1b1x1_297017_jxiaH2Cy/fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-00-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_044916_TTUQ1b1x1_297017_jxiaH2Cy/fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-01-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ahcdIEzmOe
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_044916_TTUQ1b1x1_297017_jxiaH2Cy/fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-01-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-33-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-33-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits and wcs_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-33-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits.wcscat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-33-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits and wcs_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-33-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits.wcscat 
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-33-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits and wcs_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-33-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-33-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-33-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-33-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 25793 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 77.9778 to 102.6274 deg, Dec +39.9528 to +51.3301 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 77.9778 to 102.6274 deg, Dec 39.9528 to 51.3301 deg
Loaded 11872 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7973 out of 8933 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8933 out of 25793 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.931400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.931400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.57
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.36

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.36

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 25793 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 77.9778 to 102.6274 deg, Dec +39.9528 to +51.3301 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 77.9778 to 102.6274 deg, Dec 39.9528 to 51.3301 deg
Loaded 11872 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7973 out of 8933 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8933 out of 25793 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-33-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-33-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-33-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-33-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-33-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 25835 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 77.9774 to 102.6276 deg, Dec +39.9529 to +51.3400 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 77.9774 to 102.6276 deg, Dec 39.9529 to 51.3400 deg
Loaded 11882 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7968 out of 8931 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8931 out of 25835 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-34-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-34-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-34-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-34-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-34-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 6 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.2 pix  Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-33-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits
 2.2 pix  Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-34-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
 2.4 pix  fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-00-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits
 2.4 pix  fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-01-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.4 mag.  Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-33-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits
 15.4 mag.  Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-34-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
 11.6 mag.  fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-00-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits
 11.7 mag.  fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-01-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  11.6 (SNR )   9.8 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.R96tSciSle (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-04_CI_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_044916_TTUQ1b1x1_297017_jxiaH2Cy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-33-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-33-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-33-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-33-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-33-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-33-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-33-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-33-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-33-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-33-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-33-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-33-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-33-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-33-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-33-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-33-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-33-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-33-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2509, bad_region=0, passed=25793
Got 25793 stars (including 23250 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-33-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 25793 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 40.0 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4857 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4818 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4818 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4818 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25793 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 40.0 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4857 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4818 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25793 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4818 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25793 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 
Excluding outliers - 4818 stars left (next iteration limit 5299)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-33-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-33-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits N_match=4818 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.460 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.331 n_q1=1012 n_q2=1164 n_q3=1195 n_q4=1447 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.236
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-33-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-33-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-33-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits -region wcs_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-33-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-33-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.lIGRqw7LXj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-04_CI_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_044916_TTUQ1b1x1_297017_jxiaH2Cy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-34-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-34-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-34-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-34-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-34-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-34-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-34-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-34-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-34-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-34-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-34-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-34-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-34-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-34-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-34-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-34-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-34-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-34-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2498, bad_region=0, passed=25835
Got 25835 stars (including 23302 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-34-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 25835 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 40.0 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4857 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4816 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4816 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4816 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25835 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 40.0 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4857 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4816 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25835 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4816 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25835 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 
Excluding outliers - 4816 stars left (next iteration limit 5297)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-34-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-34-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits N_match=4816 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.332 n_q1=1014 n_q2=1162 n_q3=1187 n_q4=1453 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.114
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-34-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-34-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-34-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits -region wcs_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-34-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-34-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.9rNrDvBUbz (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-04_CI_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_044916_TTUQ1b1x1_297017_jxiaH2Cy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_044916_TTUQ1b1x1_297017_jxiaH2Cy/fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-00-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_044916_TTUQ1b1x1_297017_jxiaH2Cy/fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-00-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_044916_TTUQ1b1x1_297017_jxiaH2Cy/fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-00-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_044916_TTUQ1b1x1_297017_jxiaH2Cy/fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-00-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_044916_TTUQ1b1x1_297017_jxiaH2Cy/fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-00-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_044916_TTUQ1b1x1_297017_jxiaH2Cy/fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-00-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-00-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-00-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-00-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-00-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-00-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-00-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-00-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_044916_TTUQ1b1x1_297017_jxiaH2Cy/fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-00-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-00-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=89, bad_region=0, passed=1664
Got 1664 stars (including 1574 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-00-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 1664 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013125 (47.3 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010500 (37.8 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 1517 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1494 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1469 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1494 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1632 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 1516 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1495 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1634 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1495 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1634 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50" 
Excluding outliers - 1495 stars left (next iteration limit 1643)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=1495 robust_rms=5.129 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=32.726 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=1495 robust_rms=0.564 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.651 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=1495 robust_rms=0.421 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.502 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=1495 robust_rms_before=1.372 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.513 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.421 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.674 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.502
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-00-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-00-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits
Image size: 945.5'x627.0'  15.8(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:00.427 +46:00:54.37 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 

 ### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
 ### Converted positions of 1664 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-00-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-04_CI_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_044916_TTUQ1b1x1_297017_jxiaH2Cy/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky313782.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 1.372 -> 0.421 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-00-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits N_match=1495 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.435 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.489 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.539 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.430 n_q1=565 n_q2=168 n_q3=536 n_q4=226 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.239
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-00-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-00-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_044916_TTUQ1b1x1_297017_jxiaH2Cy/fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-00-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-00-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-00-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ahcdIEzmOe (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-04_CI_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_044916_TTUQ1b1x1_297017_jxiaH2Cy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_044916_TTUQ1b1x1_297017_jxiaH2Cy/fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-01-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_044916_TTUQ1b1x1_297017_jxiaH2Cy/fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-01-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_044916_TTUQ1b1x1_297017_jxiaH2Cy/fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-01-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_044916_TTUQ1b1x1_297017_jxiaH2Cy/fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-01-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_044916_TTUQ1b1x1_297017_jxiaH2Cy/fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-01-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_044916_TTUQ1b1x1_297017_jxiaH2Cy/fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-01-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-01-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-01-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-01-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-01-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-01-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-01-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-01-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_044916_TTUQ1b1x1_297017_jxiaH2Cy/fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-01-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-01-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=86, bad_region=0, passed=1708
Got 1708 stars (including 1622 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-01-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 1708 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013124 (47.2 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010499 (37.8 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 1563 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1542 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1518 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1541 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1676 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 1562 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1542 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1678 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1542 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1678 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52" 
Excluding outliers - 1542 stars left (next iteration limit 1695)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=1542 robust_rms=5.314 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=34.427 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=1542 robust_rms=0.540 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.658 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=1542 robust_rms=0.397 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.553 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=1542 robust_rms_before=1.399 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.576 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.397 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.723 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.553
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-01-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-01-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits
Image size: 945.5'x626.9'  15.8(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:59:58.070 +46:00:23.26 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 

 ### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
 ### Converted positions of 1708 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-01-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-04_CI_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_044916_TTUQ1b1x1_297017_jxiaH2Cy/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky313783.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 1.399 -> 0.397 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-01-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits N_match=1542 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.472 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.569 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.430 n_q1=585 n_q2=171 n_q3=540 n_q4=246 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.382
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-01-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-01-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_044916_TTUQ1b1x1_297017_jxiaH2Cy/fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-01-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-01-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-01-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-33-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits sigma_overall=0.373 worst_q_ratio=1.236
ref2=Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-34-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits sigma_overall=0.375 worst_q_ratio=1.114
new1=fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-00-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits sigma_overall=0.435 worst_q_ratio=1.239
new2=fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-01-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits sigma_overall=0.412 worst_q_ratio=1.382
reference average sigma_overall=0.374 worst_q_ratio=1.175
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################

Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-33-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220_astrometric_residuals.png (4818 matched stars from wcs_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-33-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-34-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221_astrometric_residuals.png (4816 matched stars from wcs_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-34-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-00-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0394_astrometric_residuals.png (1495 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-00-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-01-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395_astrometric_residuals.png (1542 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-01-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)


Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-00-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-00-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_044916_TTUQ1b1x1_297017_jxiaH2Cy/wcs_fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-00-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-01-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-01-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_044916_TTUQ1b1x1_297017_jxiaH2Cy/wcs_fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-01-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31717_fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-01-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 31717_fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-01-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 04.37604    2461256.87604    9.36    06:09:52.07 +46:34:28.0   5790 3610   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_044916_TTUQ1b1x1_297017_jxiaH2Cy/fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-01-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits

**** FOUND  06:09:52.09 +46:34:28.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31721_fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-01-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 31721_fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-01-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 04.37604    2461256.87604    9.70    05:57:24.00 +48:22:41.8   4456 4607   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_044916_TTUQ1b1x1_297017_jxiaH2Cy/fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-01-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits

**** FOUND  05:57:23.98 +48:22:42.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02446_fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-01-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 02446_fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-01-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 08 04.37604    2461256.87604    9.12    05:27:04.67 +50:07:25.5   1463 5673   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_044916_TTUQ1b1x1_297017_jxiaH2Cy/fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-01-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits

**** FOUND  05:27:04.67 +50:07:25.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18275_fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-01-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 18275_fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-01-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 08 04.37604    2461256.87604    8.91    06:12:08.11 +43:09:52.5   6212 1588   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_044916_TTUQ1b1x1_297017_jxiaH2Cy/fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-01-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits

**** FOUND  06:12:08.15 +43:09:52.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 00922_fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-01-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 00922_fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-01-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 08 04.37604    2461256.87604    9.25    06:26:01.87 +50:29:28.6   7135 6151   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_044916_TTUQ1b1x1_297017_jxiaH2Cy/fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-01-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits

**** FOUND  06:26:01.87 +50:29:28.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22369_fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-01-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 22369_fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-01-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 08 04.37604    2461256.87604    9.58    05:32:37.42 +41:28:12.2   1839 0407   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_044916_TTUQ1b1x1_297017_jxiaH2Cy/fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-01-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits

**** FOUND  05:32:37.42 +41:28:12.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Aur-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL

  ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-33-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-34-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_044916_TTUQ1b1x1_297017_jxiaH2Cy/fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-00-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_044916_TTUQ1b1x1_297017_jxiaH2Cy/fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-01-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits
  
Last  image: 2461256.87533999 04.08.2026 09:00:19.375 UTC
WARNING: VaST exited with code 1 on the field Aur-02-Q1b1x1 AFTER completing the measurements. This is a memory-management crash during cleanup (a VaST bug to report), NOT a wrong field / clouds / bad focus. The lightcurves were written, so the transient search continues.
____ VaST output (crashed during memory cleanup; the measurements above are complete) ____

--==VaST 1.0rc90==--

Parsing command line arguments...
opt 'F': Will NOT create flag images for SExtractor
opt '5': 5.000000 pix is the new fixed star matching radius!
opt 'b': Using 500 reference stars for image matching!
opt '3': Will try to select best aperture for each source!
opt 'y': 0 SysRem iterations will be conducted!
opt 't 4': robust linear magnitude calibration (vary zero-point and slope)
opt 'x': 99 is the maximum acceptable SExtractor flag!
WARNING: disabling the mag-size filter in order not to reject blended stars.
opt 'u': Stick with UTC time system, no conversion to TT will be done!
opt 'f': Run ./find_candidates manually!
opt 'k': "JD" keyword in FITS image header will be ignored!
INFO from vast_remove_directory(): Could not open directory: symlinks_to_images
INFO from vast_remove_directory(): Could not open directory: converted_images
INFO from vast_remove_directory(): Could not open directory: unpacked_images

Checking the list of input images specified on the command line ...

Looking for the list of input images with time corrections in vast_list_of_input_images_with_time_corrections.txt ... list not found.
This is OK if you specify the input images on the command line, not through this text file.
Checking write permissions for the current directory (/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-04_CI_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_044916_TTUQ1b1x1_297017_jxiaH2Cy)...  OK
Found a system-wide installation of SExtractor
Cleaning old outNNNNN.dat files.
Done with cleaning!

 VaST was started with the following command line: 
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-33-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-34-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_044916_TTUQ1b1x1_297017_jxiaH2Cy/fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-00-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_044916_TTUQ1b1x1_297017_jxiaH2Cy/fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-01-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits 


Preparing to process 4 input FITS images...


######## Forcing special settings for the transient detection ########
transient search mode: disabling the mag-size filter as it should be switched off when running a transient search!
transient search mode: disabling the bad image filter as it will not help during the transient search!
transient search mode: will not try to gues image saturation limit
transient search mode: no UTC-to-TT time system conversion will be performed!!!
transient search mode: setting the maximum acceptable SExtractor flag to 3
transient search mode: disabling rejectin of images with elliptical stars
transient search mode: not discarding large sources
################
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
Setting the fixed star match radius of 5.00 pix
We have 4 images to process.
SExtractor catalog cache: restored Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-33-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits catalog from cache
SExtractor catalog cache: restored Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-34-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits catalog from cache
Running SExtractor in 3 parallel threads...
Using the catalog image00001.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-33-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits
Using the catalog image00002.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-34-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
The gain value (GAIN=0.830) from default.sex will be used for image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_044916_TTUQ1b1x1_297017_jxiaH2Cy/fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-00-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits
The above guess is based on the non-default gain value specified in default.sex by user
Parent process says: we are done fork()ing.
Waiting for thread 2 to finish...
The gain value (GAIN=0.830) from default.sex will be used for image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aur-02-Q1autodetect_aperture() is running SExtractor on /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_044916_TTUQ1b1x1b1x1_044916_TTUQ1b1x1_297017_jxiaH2Cy/fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-01-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits
The above guess is b_297017_jxiaH2Cy/fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-00-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits
ased on the non-default gain value specified in default.sex by user
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
autodetect_aperture() is doing a preliminary SExtractor run to determine an appropriate aperture size
sex -c default.sex  -PARAMETERS_NAME autodetect_aper.param -CATALOG_NAME autodetect_aper_image00003.cat  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_044916_TTUQ1b1x1_297017_jxiaH2Cy/fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-00-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits > image00003.cat.sex_log 2>&1
autodetect_aperture() is running SExtractor on /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_044916_TTUQ1b1x1_297017_jxiaH2Cy/fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-01-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
autodetect_aperture() is doing a preliminary SExtractor run to determine an appropriate aperture size
sex -c default.sex  -PARAMETERS_NAME autodetect_aper.param -CATALOG_NAME autodetect_aper_image00004.cat  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_044916_TTUQ1b1x1_297017_jxiaH2Cy/fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-01-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits > image00004.cat.sex_log 2>&1
autodetect_aperture() is doing the main SExtractor run
sex  -PARAMETERS_NAME default.param -PHOT_APERTURES 4.6,4.6,4.1,5.0,5.5,5.9 -VERBOSE_TYPE NORMAL -CATALOG_NAME image00003.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_044916_TTUQ1b1x1_297017_jxiaH2Cy/fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-00-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits > image00003.cat.sex_log 2>&1
autodetect_aperture() is doing the main SExtractor run
sex  -PARAMETERS_NAME default.param -PHOT_APERTURES 4.6,4.6,4.1,5.0,5.5,6.0 -VERBOSE_TYPE NORMAL -CATALOG_NAME image00004.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_044916_TTUQ1b1x1_297017_jxiaH2Cy/fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-01-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits > image00004.cat.sex_log 2>&1
autodetect_aperture() is done with image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_044916_TTUQ1b1x1_297017_jxiaH2Cy/fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-01-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits
Waiting for thread 1 to finish...
autodetect_aperture() is done with image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_044916_TTUQ1b1x1_297017_jxiaH2Cy/fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-00-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits


Done with SExtractor!

TIMING SExtractor: 4 seconds


Matching stars between images!

No manually selected comparison stars file manually_selected_comparison_stars.lst which is fine.
Processing  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-33-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits
9576x6388 FITS image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-33-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits
Trying to guess the time system by parsing the comment string 'Time of observation (UTC)'
Time system set from the comment to DATE-OBS keyword: 'Time of observation (UTC)'
The input time system is identified as: UTC (blank if unknown)
Setting observation date using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-01-18T05:33:08.8373981
Setting observation time using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-01-18T05:33:08.8373981

Observing time converted to the "standard" FITS header format:
DATE-OBS= 2026-01-18T05:33:08.837
EXPTIME = 20.000

Using the catalog image00001.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-33-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits
Exposure 20 sec, 18.01.2026 05:33:08.837 UTC = JD(UTC) 2461058.73146802 mid. exp.
The reference image star  1327.519   612.899 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star  8274.205  1399.687 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star  3619.758  1439.351 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star   226.925  1548.706 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star   726.816  2731.983 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star  2176.966  4207.315 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star  9446.385  4276.273 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star  8805.521  4312.754 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star  2317.979  4331.979 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star  9386.024  5661.749 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
SExtractor output filtering results:
 * passed selection: 178079, (178078 good for image matching)
 * rejected as having no flux measurement: 0
 * rejected as having SNR<3.0: 59
 * rejected inside rectangles defined in bad_region.lst: 10
 * rejected close to frame edge: 905
 * rejected as being too small (<1.2 pix): 0
 * rejected as being too large (>4.7 pix): 0
 * rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0
 * rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0
 * rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 12
 * rejected due to an external image flag: 0
 * rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0
---
You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'.

Please note: the CCD position-dependent magnitude correction will be applied.
get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -7.27
Detection limit from the magnitude-SNR relation= -7.3  (5.0 sigma detection)
The simple faintest star detection limit= -6.5
80 percent brightest stars detection limit= -7.8
Selected detection limit= -7.8
Final detection limit= -7.8 (after subtracting MAG_TRANSIENT_ABOVE_THE_REFERENCE_FRAME_LIMIT=0.0)

Parameter box for transient search:    10.04.7 pix): 0
 * rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0
 * rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0
 * rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 10
 * rejected due to an external image flag: 0
 * rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0
---
You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'.
    176950 * detected, using  496/ 500 * for reference/current image matching, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.013983, number_of_ambiguous_matches=2490 
refining the coordinate transformation... [CVPOLY iter 1: order=2 pairs=161840 inliers=161840 rms 0.30 -> 0.29 pix, max corner correction 0.3 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.014027, number_of_ambiguous_matches=2498 
161843 * matched, [CVPOLY iter 2: order=1 pairs=161843 inliers=161843 rms 0.29 -> 0.29 pix, max corner correction 0.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.014027, number_of_ambiguous_matches=2498 
161843 * matched (2nd iteration). [CVPOLY iter 3: order=1 pairs=161843 inliers=161843 rms 0.29 -> 0.29 pix, max corner correction 0.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.014027, number_of_ambiguous_matches=2498 
161843 * matched (3rd iteration). Success!
  rotation [degrees] =   0.008
    176950 stars detected, 161843 stars matched
Performing magnitude calibration using automatically selected comparison stars
Expecting to find at least 40 * for magnitude calibration
We have N_good_stars = 137782, N_manually_selected_comparison_stars = 0
Using 137782 stars for magnitude calibration (before filtering).
Iteratively removing outliers from the linear mag-mag relation (unweighted fit)...
After removing outliers in (X,Y,dm) plane, we are left with 137776 stars for magnitude calibration.
Using the linear CCD position-dependent magnitude correction:
 delta_m = -0.00000*X_pix -0.00000*Y_pix -0.00037
Iteratively removing outliers from the mag-mag relation (weighted linear/polynomial fit)...
Computing robust linear magnitude calibration.
Used 131641 stars for magnitude calibration (after filtering).
get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -7.27
    193186 objects stored in memory (1000000 max.)
Magnitude calibration is performed successfully!
Saving observations to the cache... OK
memory:  347940 kB used, 374720 kB peak, 65263848 kB available RAM
Total number of measurements 355029 (355029 measurements stored in RAM)
sorting the measurements cached in memory,
writing lightcurve (outNNNNN.dat) files...
processed 2 of 4 images ( 50.0%)



Processing  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_044916_TTUQ1b1x1_297017_jxiaH2Cy/fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-00-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits
9576x6388 FITS image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_044916_TTUQ1b1x1_297017_jxiaH2Cy/fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-00-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits
Trying to guess the time system by parsing the comment string 'Time of observation (UTC)'
Time system set from the comment to DATE-OBS keyword: 'Time of observation (UTC)'
The input time system is identified as: UTC (blank if unknown)
Setting observation date using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-08-04T09:00:19.3753058
Setting observation time using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-08-04T09:00:19.3753058

Observing time converted to the "standard" FITS header format:
DATE-OBS= 2026-08-04T09:00:19.375
EXPTIME = 20.000

Using the catalog image00003.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_044916_TTUQ1b1x1_297017_jxiaH2Cy/fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-00-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits
The star  6852.001  4571.982 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
SExtractor output filtering results:
 * passed selection: 16864
 * rejected as having no flux measurement: 0
 * rejected as having SNR<3.0: 0
 * rejected inside rectangles defined in bad_region.lst: 1
 * rejected close to frame edge: 85
 * rejected as being too small (<1.1 pix): 0
 * rejected as being too large (>4.6 pix): 0
 * rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0
 * rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0
 * rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 15
 * rejected due to an external image flag: 0
 * rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0
---
You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'.
    16864 * detected, using  100/ 500 * for reference/current image matching, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000062, number_of_ambiguous_matches=12 
refining the coordinate transformation... [CVPOLY iter 1: order=3 pairs=16363 inliers=16363 rms 1.35 -> 0.51 pix, max corner correction 12.2 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000047, number_of_ambiguous_matches=9 
16615 * matched, [CVPOLY iter 2: order=3 pairs=16615 inliers=16615 rms 0.51 -> 0.28 pix, max corner correction 8.2 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000047, number_of_ambiguous_matches=9 
16665 * matched (2nd iteration). [CVPOLY iter 3: order=3 pairs=16665 inliers=16665 rms 0.31 -> 0.29 pix, max corner correction 1.4 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000047, number_of_ambiguous_matches=9 
16668 * matched (3rd iteration). Success!
  rotation [degrees] = 179.572
    16864 stars detected, 16668 stars matched
Performing magnitude calibration using automatically selected comparison stars
Expecting to find at least 40 * for magnitude calibration
We have N_good_stars = 11673, N_manually_selected_comparison_stars = 0
Using 11673 stars for magnitude calibration (before filtering).
Iteratively removing outliers from the linear mag-mag relation (unweighted fit)...
After removing outliers in (X,Y,dm) plane, we are left with 10953 stars for magnitude calibration.
Using the linear CCD position-dependent magnitude correction:
 delta_m = 0.00012*X_pix -0.00008*Y_pix -0.08809
ERROR in magnitude calibration: fabs(lin_mag_A * X_im_size + lin_mag_C) > MAX_LIN_CORR_MAG
Used 10953 stars for magnitude calibration (after filtering).
get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -8.35
 ERROR!!! Magnitude calibration failure. Dropping image. 
    193186 objects stored in memory (1000000 max.)
memory:  467328 kB used, 620332 kB peak, 65263848 kB available RAM
processed 3 of 4 images ( 75.0%)



Processing  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_044916_TTUQ1b1x1_297017_jxiaH2Cy/fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-01-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits
9576x6388 FITS image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_044916_TTUQ1b1x1_297017_jxiaH2Cy/fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-01-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits
Trying to guess the time system by parsing the comment string 'Time of observation (UTC)'
Time system set from the comment to DATE-OBS keyword: 'Time of observation (UTC)'
The input time system is identified as: UTC (blank if unknown)
Setting observation date using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-08-04T09:01:19.5569966
Setting observation time using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-08-04T09:01:19.5569966

Observing time converted to the "standard" FITS header format:
DATE-OBS= 2026-08-04T09:01:19.556
EXPTIME = 20.000

Using the catalog image00004.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_044916_TTUQ1b1x1_297017_jxiaH2Cy/fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-01-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits
The star  6851.996  4572.008 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
SExtractor output filtering results:
 * passed selection: 16894
 * rejected as having no flux measurement: 0
 * rejected as having SNR<3.0: 0
 * rejected inside rectangles defined in bad_region.lst: 1
 * rejected close to frame edge: 89
 * rejected as being too small (<1.1 pix): 0
 * rejected as being too large (>4.6 pix): 0
 * rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0
 * rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0
 * rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 17
 * rejected due to an external image flag: 0
 * rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0
---
You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'.
    16894 * detected, using  100/ 500 * for reference/current image matching, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000083, number_of_ambiguous_matches=16 
refining the coordinate transformation... [CVPOLY iter 1: order=3 pairs=16454 inliers=16454 rms 1.31 -> 0.46 pix, max corner correction 11.9 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000062, number_of_ambiguous_matches=12 
16686 * matched, [CVPOLY iter 2: order=3 pairs=16686 inliers=16686 rms 0.46 -> 0.25 pix, max corner correction 7.4 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000062, number_of_ambiguous_matches=12 
16737 * matched (2nd iteration). [CVPOLY iter 3: order=3 pairs=16737 inliers=16737 rms 0.29 -> 0.28 pix, max corner correction 1.4 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000062, number_of_ambiguous_matches=12 
16738 * matched (3rd iteration). Success!
  rotation [degrees] = 179.564
    16894 stars detected, 16738 stars matched
Performing magnitude calibration using automatically selected comparison stars
Expecting to find at least 40 * for magnitude calibration
We have N_good_stars = 11803, N_manually_selected_comparison_stars = 0
Using 11803 stars for magnitude calibration (before filtering).
Iteratively removing outliers from the linear mag-mag relation (unweighted fit)...
After removing outliers in (X,Y,dm) plane, we are left with 11077 stars for magnitude calibration.
Using the linear CCD position-dependent magnitude correction:
 delta_m = 0.00012*X_pix -0.00008*Y_pix -0.08811
ERROR in magnitude calibration: fabs(lin_mag_A * X_im_size + lin_mag_C) > MAX_LIN_CORR_MAG
Used 11077 stars for magnitude calibration (after filtering).
get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -8.35
 ERROR!!! Magnitude calibration failure. Dropping image. 
    193186 objects stored in memory (1000000 max.)
memory:  467328 kB used, 620332 kB peak, 65263848 kB available RAM
processed 4 of 4 images (100.0%)
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 6 seconds
Done with measurements! =)

Total number of measurements 355029 (0 measurements stored in RAM)
Freeing up some memory...  Sorting the measurements cached in memory...
Writing lightcurve (outNNNNN.dat) files...
TIMING lightcurve_write: 0 seconds
The lightcurve files have been written, freeing up more memory...
Creating vast_image_details.log ... 

Writing summary file: vast_summary.log ...  OK
Selecting the best aperture for each source
Aperture with index 0 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.00*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 37109 stars
Aperture with index 1 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.00*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for     0 stars
Aperture with index 2 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER -0.10*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 41042 stars
Aperture with index 3 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.10*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 25282 stars
Aperture with index 4 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.20*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 22731 stars
Aperture with index 5 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.30*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 35679 stars

done!  =)
TIMING select_aperture: 5 seconds
Computing lightcurve statistics...  Will not compute variability indexes for objects having <1 points in lightcurve
You may disable this by commenting out the line '#define DROP_LIGHTCURVES_WITH_SMALL_NUMBER_OF_POINTS_FROM_ALL_PLOTS' in src/vast_limits.h an re-compiling VaST with 'make'

Computing, please wait a bit
...........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
vast_lightcurve_statistics.log: 161107 objects, the longest string is 385 bytes.
Allocating memory for resorting the file.



----***** VaST processing WARNING *****----
You asked VaST to process 4 images, but only 1 were actually matched to the reference one.
Please investigate this!



**************************************************************
This error might be a bug, but it is far more likely that it is caused by 
inappropriate input data. A few simple things to check in the diagnostic
messages printed above (or the vast*.log files):
 * How many of the input images are matched?
 * Does the number of detected stars on each image look reasonable?
 * Do images have a sufficient overlap of at least about 20 percent?

You may run
 ./sextract_single_image /path/to/my/image/file.fit
to see how well VaST detects stars with the current SExtractor settings
(star detection settings can be changed in the default.sex configuration
file, see various examples in the VaST directory).

If you cannot identify the problem, please e-mail Kirill Sokolovsky 
Please try to describe the problem in details and, if possible, attach vast_summary.log
file and a few example images. If the images are too big to be sent by e-mail, please 
upload them through a web-form http://scan.sai.msu.ru/upload/
**************************************************************

Low percentage of matched images - we'll declare this an unsuccessful VaST run (exit code 1)
_____________________
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-33-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-34-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-33-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-34-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_044916_TTUQ1b1x1_297017_jxiaH2Cy/fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-00-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_044916_TTUQ1b1x1_297017_jxiaH2Cy/fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-01-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits
Last  image: 2461256.87533999 04.08.2026 09:00:19.375 UTC
ERROR running VaST on the field Aur-02-Q1b1x1 (less than 4 images processed)
exp_start= 18.01.2026 05:33:08.837  exp=   20.000  JD= 2461058.73146802  ap=  4.7  rotation=   0.000  *detected= 178079  *matched= 178079  status=OK     /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-33-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits
exp_start= 18.01.2026 05:34:12.189  exp=   20.000  JD= 2461058.73220126  ap=  4.7  rotation=   0.008  *detected= 176950  *matched= 161843  status=OK     /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-34-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
exp_start= 04.08.2026 09:00:19.375  exp=   20.000  JD= 2461256.87533999  ap=  4.6  rotation= 179.572  *detected= 16864  *matched= 16668  status=ERROR  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_044916_TTUQ1b1x1_297017_jxiaH2Cy/fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-00-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0394.fits
exp_start= 04.08.2026 09:01:19.556  exp=   20.000  JD= 2461256.87603653  ap=  4.6  rotation= 179.564  *detected= 16894  *matched= 16738  status=ERROR  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_044916_TTUQ1b1x1_297017_jxiaH2Cy/fd_Aur-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_04-01-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0395.fits
########### Completed Aur-02-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
###################################################################################
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO  ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461256.87533999 -observatory V36
07:35:54.87 +20:18:31.3 Mercury (-0.1mag)
11:49:04.69 +00:50:09.5 Venus (-4.3mag)
05:38:03.33 +23:28:41.2 Mars (1.3mag)
08:39:28.14 +18:54:04.1 Jupiter (-1.8mag)
00:56:38.77 +03:17:55.8 Saturn (0.6mag)
04:11:15.99 +20:55:44.9 Uranus (5.8mag)
00:16:18.65 +00:14:42.1 Neptune (7.7mag)
20:28:30.67 -23:28:40.6 Pluto (14.4mag)
01:08:20.79 +11:04:26.3 Moon (-10.9mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 Aug  4 04:51 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461256.87533999:
08:39:35.63 +18:53:32.9 Io (6.0mag)
08:39:32.83 +18:53:45.5 Europa (6.3mag)
08:39:14.75 +18:55:01.1 Ganymede (5.6mag)
08:39:03.10 +18:55:50.9 Callisto (6.7mag)
08:37:06.33 +18:51:07.8 Himalia (15.7mag)
08:39:28.99 +18:54:01.0 Thebe (16.6mag)
08:36:35.75 +18:50:25.1 Elara (17.7mag)
08:43:32.91 +18:35:22.0 Pasiphae (17.9mag)
08:42:54.20 +19:03:31.3 Carme (19.0mag)
00:56:45.08 +03:18:13.2 Titan (8.4mag)
00:56:43.45 +03:17:50.3 Rhea (9.7mag)
00:56:37.05 +03:15:59.9 Iapetus (11.1mag)
00:56:31.45 +03:18:22.4 Hyperion (14.4mag)
00:56:06.20 +03:11:37.3 Phoebe (16.5mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Aug  4 04:51 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461256.87533999:
18:48:04.61 -24:53:02.7 JWST
18:27:22.52 +21:04:09.0 Chandra
10:47:04.49 -58:55:22.2 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Aug  4 04:51 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461256.87533999 -observatory V36
03:09:13.28 +17:02:44.0 17.7mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist)
18:03:03.07 -34:38:49.1 13.9mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
06:50:10.67 -68:45:47.9 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
06:08:46.44 +32:54:48.1 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
03:31:58.48 +35:47:41.9 16.6mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
22:41:46.30 +31:39:51.0 17.3mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
06:39:36.43 +26:36:22.1 16.8mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
10:18:00.86 +28:38:35.7 17.0mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
09:26:16.81 +05:17:16.9 17.9mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
15:11:53.93 -12:08:19.5 17.9mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
21:15:54.89 +66:24:53.5 17.9mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
15:51:56.00 -12:34:28.1 14.3mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
08:03:43.39 +31:10:23.0 15.2mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:07:39.30 +15:37:09.6 17.7mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
19:08:03.79 +42:49:46.7 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
21:16:20.42 +48:56:37.1 17.6mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS)
05:12:00.22 -13:01:19.9 15.5mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
06:53:40.13 +24:49:48.6 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
07:29:06.36 -15:37:18.4 17.6mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS)
10:27:36.14 +21:08:38.4 17.3mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
12:55:52.86 +02:36:02.7 17.0mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
16:04:40.96 +78:10:42.0 16.9mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
03:05:53.44 +46:06:10.7 17.1mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
11:43:39.29 +08:07:32.7 17.2mag A/2026 E1
21:53:56.76 -25:39:17.0 6.9mag 10P/Tempel
11:26:40.96 -03:09:57.4 16.2mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
04:34:25.05 +32:05:20.8 18.0mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson
10:59:49.93 +05:54:06.8 17.2mag 63P/Wild
00:54:17.83 -05:19:11.0 15.5mag 65P/Gunn
05:26:45.58 +20:44:53.2 13.7mag 78P/Gehrels
20:41:27.55 -23:04:22.5 17.9mag 84P/Giclas
02:56:45.05 +13:23:24.5 16.6mag 88P/Howell
07:45:56.63 +28:10:02.2 16.1mag 93P/Lovas
03:55:37.44 +15:22:59.8 17.7mag 112P/Urata-Niijima
05:43:43.93 +30:40:46.3 16.3mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
09:09:20.41 +27:17:18.7 15.0mag 123P/West-Hartley
11:36:04.66 -08:46:56.7 17.1mag 124P/Mrkos
05:30:49.88 +21:11:13.4 16.1mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
06:21:52.50 +19:04:42.1 17.9mag 131P/Mueller
00:03:54.41 +03:25:45.9 17.6mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma
03:21:56.42 -19:49:19.3 14.1mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
07:02:46.58 +37:33:49.2 15.8mag 162P/SidingSpring
16:19:42.82 +37:44:02.6 12.5mag 169P/NEAT
02:35:46.40 +09:25:36.4 17.6mag 220P/McNaught
16:39:44.74 -09:48:47.1 17.6mag 235P/LINEAR
20:25:03.28 -52:49:29.5 17.8mag 259P/Garradd
03:10:53.69 +23:31:19.9 15.4mag 260P/McNaught
06:53:43.43 +37:46:34.0 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR
15:09:19.46 +03:33:36.5 17.7mag 391P/Kowalski
08:57:22.29 +18:33:48.1 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS
08:30:00.50 +37:04:23.4 18.0mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.5K Aug  4 04:51 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00  ASASSN-26er  2026-07-25.82 15.09
01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00  SN2026vbh  2026-07-25.61 15.97
21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90  ASASSN-26eq  2026-07-24.37 15.13
18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60  ASASSN-26ep  2026-07-23.47 -4.06
12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50  ASASSN-26et  2026-07-22.76 13.98
13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60  SN2026uwk  2026-07-21.75 16.38
18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90  ASASSN-26en  2026-07-21.77 14.63
14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10  ASASSN-26es  2026-07-20.79 15.36
20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00  ASASSN-26em  2026-07-20.94 16.83
18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70  ASASSN-26eu  2026-07-20.93 14.86
03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40  AT2026ugi  2026-07-20.03 17.12
18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80  ASASSN-26eo  2026-07-19.36 16.16
04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80  ASASSN-26ej  2026-07-16.17 17.02
18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90  ASASSN-26ek  2026-07-16.24 15.73
17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50  ASASSN-26el  2026-07-15.86 16.01
14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30  ASASSN-26ei  2026-07-16.17 16.46
10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10  AT 2023mhb  2026-07-14.73 16.67
14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20  AT 2026unl  2026-07-15.27 17.11
10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80  ASASSN-26eh  2026-07-14.72 16.58
19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80  ASASSN-22le  2026-07-14.15 15.5
02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30  ASASSN-26ef  2026-07-12.35 15.86
23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70  SN 2026qtn  2026-07-12.22 16.47
02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40  ASASSN-26ec  2026-07-11.53 2.78
18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50  AT2026stb  2026-07-11.28 -1.29
13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00  AT2026pjf  2026-07-10.18 -0.72
17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70  SN2026pir  2026-07-9.86 -0.66
11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30  ASASSN-26ed  2026-07-8.8 -1.3
23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10  AT2026qil  2026-07-9.3 16.15
20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10  ASASSN-26ee  2026-07-7.22 15.53
19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80  AT2026ryu  2026-07-7.17 14.88
11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50  AT2026qqg  2026-07-5.01 16.82
19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30  AT2026qly  2026-07-5.02 17.31
17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10  ASASSN-26ea  2026-07-5.07 16.67
19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30  ASASSN-26eb  2026-07-4.97 15.52
18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20  SN 2026qqp  2026-07-5.03 -0.92
19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90  ASASSN-26dz  2026-07-5.14 15.91
19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90  AT 2026rdg  2026-07-3.43 11.81
04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40  AT 2026qpr  2026-06-30.4 15.96
13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80  SN 2026pub  2026-06-30.09 16.01
16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70  SN 2026pel  2026-06-26.38 16.07
10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30  ASASSN-26dy  2026-06-25.99 15.63
14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30  ASASSN-26dv  2026-06-23.03 14.62
13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70  ASASSN-26dw  2026-06-23.04 16.09
00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20  SN 2026mke  2026-06-22.39 17.13
11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50  SN 2026nmv  2026-06-22.06 16.56
21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50  AT2026oxh  2026-06-22.15 17.14
17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90  ASASSN-26dx  2026-06-22.02 14.72
14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10  AT2026pvk  2026-06-22.06 16.53
20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20  AT2026plb  2026-06-21.31 16.4
15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30  SN2026ore  2026-06-21.29 17.57
23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30  AT2026oxl  2026-06-21.52 17.64
17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20  AT2026ouj  2026-06-20.92 15.15
00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20  AT2026ntk  2026-06-18.09 17.34
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20  ASASSN-26du  2026-06-15.39 15.93
23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00  SN2026oxc  2026-06-14.35 16.83
02:02:26.78 +32:04:21.30  AT2026ovz  2026-06-14.59 15.39
21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50  AT2026nwc  2026-06-11 17.05
17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20  SN 2026odc  2026-06-11.23 17.62
13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20  SN 2026nyq  2026-06-11.1 16.24
00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90  ASASSN-26dt  2026-06-11.13 10.22
14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60  SN2026nyp  2026-06-10.3 16.32
12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50  SN2026mta  2026-06-8.29 16.69
12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20  SN2026oao  2026-06-9.32 17.02
10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60  AT2026nvf  2026-06-8.12 16.75
13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00  SN2026npn  2026-06-8.02 17.58
00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20  ASASSN-26dq  2026-06-7.43 13.58
01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70  SN 2026obc  2026-06-7.43 15.15
21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90  ASASSN-26dr  2026-06-7.24 16.24
06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00  ASASSN-26ds  2026-06-2.97 15.02
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40  SN2026mho  2026-05-25.18 -1.12
11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10  AT2026min  2026-05-24.21 16.63
11:44:33.11 -68:48:32.90  ASASSN-26no  2026-05-24.03 8.35
19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60  ASASSN-26dp  2026-05-22.31 -3.28
14:23:56.59 -58:37:47.40  ASASSN-26dn  2026-05-20.01 14.59
11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60  AT2026nma  2026-05-20.29 15.46
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10  AT2026lli  2026-05-19.34 15.86
00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70  AT2026nad  2026-05-19.39 15.34
15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40  ASASSN-26dm  2026-05-19.03 14.44
11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10  ASASSN-26dl  2026-05-18.02 13.55
13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00  ASASSN-26dk  2026-05-18.16 12.96
02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60  ASASSN-26dh  2026-05-18.43 15.37
17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90  ASASSN-26dj  2026-05-17.05 15.7
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10  ASASSN-26dg  2026-05-13.41 16.8
16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40  AT2026mhn  2026-05-12.33 15.8
09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00  ASASSN-26di  2026-05-12.14 14.63
21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00  AT2026kwu  2026-05-12.26 16.9
14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90  AT2026ktm  2026-05-12.06 17.21
14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40  AT2026lkm  2026-05-11.18 16.89
12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80  SN2026kep  2026-05-9.06 17.5
13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90  AT2026lkd  2026-05-9.09 17.23
09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60  SN2026kmo  2026-05-8.99 17.51
15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.80  AT2026lxf  2026-05-8.34 13.72
10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30  ASASSN-26df  2026-05-8.21 16.52
22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60  2026lda  2026-05-7.56 16.2
21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30  ASASSN-26de  2026-05-6.29 14.51
16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60  ASASSN-26dd  2026-05-5.15 15.93
14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50  AT2026lig  2026-05-4.27 14.63
13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50  SN2026kcp  2026-05-4.46 16.43
11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90  SN2026kza  2026-05-1.08 15.59
22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30  SN 2026fov  2026-04-29.6 14.36
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Aug  4 04:51 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4  PNV J00425120+4116594  2022-10-26.135  19.3mag
12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0  TCP J12242510+2847120  2026-05-31.6015  14.8mag
00:56:07.13 +43:01:40.6  TCP J00560713+4301406  2026-06-01.4135  12.2mag
00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2  PNV J00424164+4115162  2026-06-02.029  17.4mag
00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2  PNV J00423868+4115582  2026-06-05.1224  19.97Umag
19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7  PNV J19004295-4831017  2026-05-25.0752  14.2mag
09:55:21.28 +69:02:52.6  PNV J09552128+6902526  2026-06-13.933  18.9mag
19:51:21.42 +37:06:40.0  TCP J19512142+3706400  2026-06-17.2942  16.8mag
19:57:03.87 +37:41:46.4  TCP J19570387+3741464  2026-06-18.2638  17.5mag
00:42:32.04 +41:10:28.3  PNV J00423204+4110283  2026-06-26.059  16.6mag
02:19:17.36 +28:57:15.8  TCP J02191736+2857158  2026-07-12.3549  12.5mag
00:44:56.43 +41:57:41.6  PNV J00445643+4157416  2026-07-13.8026  17.98Cmag
00:42:55.36 +41:17:27.0  PNV J00425536+4117270  2026-07-20.1813  17.7mag
20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9  TCP J20354364+6131329  2026-07-20.5443  14.4mag
21:17:31.48 +22:25:51.0  TCP J21173148+2225510  2026-07-23.5577  14.8mag
00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8  PNV J00412404+4049028  2026-07-25.0157  18.7mag
00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6  PNV J00430426+4102286  2026-07-26.1512  20mag
14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0  TCP J14515140+6613240  2026-07-29.2561  13.5mag
00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2  PNV J00430615+4122082  2026-07-30.0085  19.4mag
00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2  PNV J00413323+4110122  2026-08-02.8913  17.1mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 189K Aug  4 04:51 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
10:58:47.565 +38:09:19.12  AT 2026uvo  2026-07-03.18 19.9993
14:54:31.980 +13:02:07.54  SN 2026uvn  2026-07-11.19 20.1757
11:46:05.083 +12:26:21.83  AT 2026uvm  2026-07-10.18 20.2568
11:40:04.094 +15:27:54.40  AT 2026uvl  2026-07-10.18 19.9181
12:34:02.109 +17:02:37.91  AT 2026uvk  2026-07-11.18 20.1243
12:30:28.971 +05:18:23.99  AT 2026uvj  2026-07-12.19 19.2944
23:48:49.816 -04:51:08.68  AT 2026uvi  2026-06-26.43 20.7591
23:50:00.336 +09:59:54.99  AT 2026uvh  2026-07-08.38 20.1317
00:30:19.249 +18:24:23.83  AT 2026uvg  2026-07-03.45 20.3378
02:34:07.458 +16:36:44.86  AT 2026uvf  2026-07-08.47 20.1237
05:51:16.620 -53:34:27.66  SN 2026uve  2026-07-14.17 17.677
14:40:13.463 -21:42:28.05  AT 2026uvd  2026-07-15.38 19.23
15:23:59.541 -29:29:57.56  AT 2026uvc  2026-07-15.38 20.26
14:05:43.115 -39:08:24.01  AT 2026uvb  2026-07-15.39 19.73
13:43:05.573 -20:04:24.22  AT 2026uva  2026-07-15.37 19.18
15:22:34.470 -05:37:40.51  AT 2026uuz  2026-07-15.39 19.82
16:09:54.586 +00:47:42.41  AT 2026uuy  2026-07-15.44 20.09
19:33:35.563 -39:15:48.22  AT 2026uux  2026-07-14.41 20.62
00:40:10.620 -43:16:14.80  AT 2026uuw  2026-06-26.42 21.69
01:06:29.115 +11:42:11.17  AT 2026uuv  2026-07-11.21 20.08
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 88K Aug  4 04:51 tns_transients_list.txt

=== Transient Factory Profiling ===
Started: Tue Aug  4 04:51:16 CDT 2026
=======================================
TIMING SExtractor: 1 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 0 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 3 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 0 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 7s (0.12 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 22s (0.37 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 0s (0.00 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 7s (0.12 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 0s (0.00 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 0s (0.00 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 3s (0.05 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 1s (0.02 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 40s (0.67 min)
TIMING SExtractor: 4 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 6 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 0 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 5 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 19s (0.32 min)
FIELD_Aur-02-Q1b1x1: 71s (1.18 min)
=======================================
TOTAL_RUNTIME: 88s (1.47 min)
Finished: Tue Aug  4 04:52:44 CDT 2026