NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields Cam-01-Q1b1x1

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 0

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field Cam-01-Q1b1x1 reference image: Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
Field Cam-01-Q1b1x1 reference image: Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
Field Cam-01-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-32-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
Field Cam-01-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Cam-01-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Cam-01-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Cam-01-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 268484 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 268484 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-32-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.png' -> 'transient_report/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-32-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits_preview.png'
Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-32-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits

renamed 'Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.png' -> 'transient_report/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits_preview.png'
Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 661.6740 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 620.8029 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2284.8131 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 599.8796 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2289.5330 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 600.8943 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 3.45308 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.002 INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 28.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-32-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-32-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-32-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Header: 67 keys total, 4 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-04T01:32:47.5168311' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-04T06:32:47.5168311' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61256.2727721757 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-04T06:32:57.4217126' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61256.2728868173 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 89.8194602993395 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 85.1082100579303 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 29.8075 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 3.41777777777778 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.00585331266367 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cam-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '06 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+85 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29511 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29511 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 28.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 28.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 56: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 57: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 58: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 59: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 60: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 61: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 62: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 63: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 64: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-32-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-32-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-32-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/d_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-32-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits :) Spent 0.532530 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/d_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-32-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 26658.571233 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-32-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=17308.5, right_median=19900.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-32-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 28.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits Header: 67 keys total, 4 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-04T01:33:34.7441053' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-04T06:33:34.7441053' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61256.2733187964 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-04T06:33:44.6440559' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61256.2734333798 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 89.8194598366599 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 85.1082100962759 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 29.8175 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 3.43388888888889 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.00524725626832 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cam-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '06 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+85 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29511 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29511 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 28.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 28.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 56: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 57: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 58: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 59: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 60: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 61: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 62: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 63: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 64: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/d_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits :) Spent 0.502966 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/d_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 26658.571233 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=17308.5, right_median=19900.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-07-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-32-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-32-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits


fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-32-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-32-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461256.77288792 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits' wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits' wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-32-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-32-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-32-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-32-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits' wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits' ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits Image size: 942.0'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 05:58:09.354 +85:01:41.35 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-32-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-32-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 05:57:37.060 +85:00:51.44 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 05:58:09.354 +85:01:41.35 Second-epoch image center 05:57:37.060 +85:00:51.44 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0181 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits Image size: 941.2'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 05:57:40.413 +85:00:29.00 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 05:58:09.354 +85:01:41.35 Second-epoch image center 05:57:40.413 +85:00:29.00 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0227 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 05:57:37.060 +85:00:51.44 Second-epoch second image center 05:57:40.413 +85:00:29.00 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00635 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits &> /tmp/tmp.G9nh1n0MUZ Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Ef9yYjOxeB Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-32-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nn2U6YdlAg Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-32-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PTu0lHVNId Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits and wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits and wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits and wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 12096 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 181.3580 to 179.5073 deg, Dec +75.8491 to +89.8984 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 181.3580 to 179.5073 deg, Dec 75.8491 to 89.8984 deg Loaded 33013 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7262 out of 7632 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 7632 out of 12096 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.843350 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.843350 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.63 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.21 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.21
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 12096 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 181.3580 to 179.5073 deg, Dec +75.8491 to +89.8984 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 181.3580 to 179.5073 deg, Dec 75.8491 to 89.8984 deg Loaded 33013 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7262 out of 7632 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 7632 out of 12096 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits (aperture=6.0) The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 12185 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 180.0696 to 179.5067 deg, Dec +75.8292 to +89.9114 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 180.0696 to 179.5067 deg, Dec 75.8292 to 89.9114 deg Loaded 33178 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7284 out of 7665 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 7665 out of 12185 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits (aperture=6.0) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.1 pix Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits 2.1 pix Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits 2.9 pix fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-32-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits 2.9 pix fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.2 mag. Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits 15.2 mag. Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits 13.9 mag. fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-32-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits 13.9 mag. fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.9 (SNR ) 11.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.G9nh1n0MUZ (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=848, bad_region=0, passed=12096 Got 12096 stars (including 11236 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12096 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 181.3580 through 0 to 179.5073, gap 179.5073 to 181.3580 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 829 to 900 (Dec 75.8 to 89.9) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4923 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4918 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12096 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 181.3577 through 0 to 179.5070, gap 179.5070 to 181.3577 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 829 to 900 (Dec 75.8 to 89.9) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4923 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12096 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12096 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" Excluding outliers - 4918 stars left (next iteration limit 5409) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits N_match=4918 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.272 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.258 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.277 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.230 n_q1=1173 n_q2=1016 n_q3=1274 n_q4=1455 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.278 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits -region wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.Ef9yYjOxeB (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=862, bad_region=0, passed=12185 Got 12185 stars (including 11310 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12185 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0696 through 0 to 179.5067, gap 179.5067 to 180.0696 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 829 to 900 (Dec 75.8 to 89.9) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4921 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12185 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0710 through 0 to 179.5079, gap 179.5079 to 180.0710 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 829 to 900 (Dec 75.8 to 89.9) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12185 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12185 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" Excluding outliers - 4922 stars left (next iteration limit 5413) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits N_match=4922 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.255 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.244 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.243 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.225 n_q1=1180 n_q2=1019 n_q3=1259 n_q4=1464 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.306 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits -region wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.nn2U6YdlAg (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-32-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-32-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-32-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-32-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-32-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-32-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-32-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-32-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-32-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-32-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-32-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-32-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-32-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-32-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-32-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=250, bad_region=0, passed=5456 Got 5456 stars (including 5203 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-32-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5456 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0304 through 0 to 179.9700, gap 179.9700 to 180.0304 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.2 to 89.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4914 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4904 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5456 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0269 through 0 to 179.9674, gap 179.9674 to 180.0269 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.2 to 89.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4914 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5456 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5456 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Excluding outliers - 4904 stars left (next iteration limit 5394) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4904 robust_rms=8.957 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=17.982 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4904 robust_rms=0.432 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.449 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4904 robust_rms=0.303 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.350 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4904 robust_rms_before=0.873 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.302 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.303 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.354 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.350 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.354 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-32-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits N_match=4904 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.268 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.249 n_q1=1462 n_q2=1058 n_q3=1382 n_q4=1002 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.180 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-32-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-32-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-32-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-32-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-32-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.PTu0lHVNId (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=251, bad_region=0, passed=5460 Got 5460 stars (including 5206 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5460 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0296 through 0 to 179.9696, gap 179.9696 to 180.0296 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.2 to 89.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4914 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4905 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5460 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0261 through 0 to 179.9663, gap 179.9663 to 180.0261 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.2 to 89.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4915 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5460 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5460 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Excluding outliers - 4906 stars left (next iteration limit 5395) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4906 robust_rms=8.869 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=17.860 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4906 robust_rms=0.397 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.417 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4906 robust_rms=0.314 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.363 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4906 robust_rms_before=0.859 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.307 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.314 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.359 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.363 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.359 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits N_match=4906 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.296 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.266 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.262 n_q1=1461 n_q2=1059 n_q3=1386 n_q4=1000 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.151 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits sigma_overall=0.272 worst_q_ratio=1.278 ref2=Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits sigma_overall=0.255 worst_q_ratio=1.306 new1=fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-32-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits sigma_overall=0.295 worst_q_ratio=1.180 new2=fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits sigma_overall=0.296 worst_q_ratio=1.151 reference average sigma_overall=0.2635 worst_q_ratio=1.292 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250_astrometric_residuals.png (4918 matched stars from wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251_astrometric_residuals.png (4922 matched stars from wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.23 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-32-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246_astrometric_residuals.png (4904 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-32-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247_astrometric_residuals.png (4906 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-32-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-32-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-32-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21461_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 The candidate 21461_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 04.27343    2461256.77343    10.87    06:23:25.56 +80:04:17.2   5520 0267   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits **** FOUND 06:23:25.60 +80:04:17.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 11786_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 The candidate 11786_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 08 04.27343    2461256.77343    10.07    02:43:16.25 +81:08:13.2   0781 2569   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits **** FOUND 02:43:16.24 +81:08:13.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 10607_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 The candidate 10607_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 08 04.27343    2461256.77343    10.56    04:55:34.57 +80:57:33.9   3381 0919   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits **** FOUND 04:55:34.57 +80:57:34.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 00627_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 The candidate 00627_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 08 04.27343    2461256.77343    6.28    09:37:03.67 +81:19:37.3   9081 3271   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits **** FOUND 09:37:03.59 +81:19:37.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-32-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-32-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-32-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-32-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits Image size: 942.0'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 05:58:09.354 +85:01:41.35 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-32-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-32-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 05:57:37.060 +85:00:51.44 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 05:58:09.354 +85:01:41.35 Second-epoch image center 05:57:37.060 +85:00:51.44 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0181 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits Image size: 941.2'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 05:57:40.413 +85:00:29.00 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 05:58:09.354 +85:01:41.35 Second-epoch image center 05:57:40.413 +85:00:29.00 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0227 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 05:57:37.060 +85:00:51.44 Second-epoch second image center 05:57:40.413 +85:00:29.00 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00635 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits &> /tmp/tmp.y6iOCjHzLw Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6O0WYEASlc Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-32-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits &> /tmp/tmp.hBfu79HdAt Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-32-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SQ9l7A8zaM Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits and wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits and wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits and wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 75571 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 180.0704 to 179.9879 deg, Dec +75.7296 to +89.9628 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 180.0704 to 179.9879 deg, Dec 75.7296 to 89.9628 deg Loaded 33692 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6762 out of 7807 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 7807 out of 75571 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.714550 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.714550 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.34 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.37 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.37
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 75571 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 180.0704 to 179.9879 deg, Dec +75.7296 to +89.9628 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 180.0704 to 179.9879 deg, Dec 75.7296 to 89.9628 deg Loaded 33692 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6762 out of 7807 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 7807 out of 75571 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits (aperture=4.6) The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 75116 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 180.0694 to 179.9961 deg, Dec +75.7501 to +89.9630 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 180.0694 to 179.9961 deg, Dec 75.7501 to 89.9630 deg Loaded 33600 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6759 out of 7815 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 7815 out of 75116 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits (aperture=4.7) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 41 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 1.9 pix Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits 2.0 pix Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits 2.8 pix fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-32-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits 2.8 pix fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.4 mag. Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits 15.4 mag. Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits 13.9 mag. fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-32-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits 13.9 mag. fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.9 (SNR ) 13.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.y6iOCjHzLw (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=4540, bad_region=2, passed=75560 Got 75560 stars (including 70879 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 75560 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0704 through 0 to 179.9879, gap 179.9879 to 180.0704 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 828 to 900 (Dec 75.7 to 90.0) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4922 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75560 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0705 through 0 to 179.9881, gap 179.9881 to 180.0705 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 828 to 900 (Dec 75.7 to 90.0) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75560 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75560 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" Excluding outliers - 4922 stars left (next iteration limit 5414) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits N_match=4922 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.259 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.255 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.255 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.227 n_q1=1150 n_q2=1043 n_q3=1285 n_q4=1444 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.263 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits -region wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.6O0WYEASlc (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=4531, bad_region=0, passed=75103 Got 75103 stars (including 70436 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 75103 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0694 through 0 to 179.9961, gap 179.9961 to 180.0694 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 828 to 900 (Dec 75.8 to 90.0) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4922 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75103 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0711 through 0 to 179.9966, gap 179.9966 to 180.0711 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 828 to 900 (Dec 75.8 to 90.0) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75103 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75103 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" Excluding outliers - 4922 stars left (next iteration limit 5414) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits N_match=4922 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.249 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.252 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.232 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.218 n_q1=1153 n_q2=1048 n_q3=1273 n_q4=1448 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.270 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits -region wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.hBfu79HdAt (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-32-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-32-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-32-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-32-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-32-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-32-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-32-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-32-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-32-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-32-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-32-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-32-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-32-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-32-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-32-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=997, bad_region=2, passed=30496 Got 30496 stars (including 29464 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-32-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30496 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0207 through 0 to 179.9933, gap 179.9933 to 180.0207 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.2 to 90.0) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4921 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4917 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30496 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0097 through 0 to 179.9911, gap 179.9911 to 180.0097 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.2 to 90.0) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4921 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30496 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30496 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Excluding outliers - 4917 stars left (next iteration limit 5408) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-32-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-32-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits N_match=4917 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.298 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.272 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.250 n_q1=1435 n_q2=1030 n_q3=1433 n_q4=1019 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.175 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-32-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-32-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-32-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-32-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-32-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.SQ9l7A8zaM (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=994, bad_region=2, passed=30599 Got 30599 stars (including 29565 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30599 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0006 through 0 to 179.9908, gap 179.9908 to 180.0006 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.2 to 90.0) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4911 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30599 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0259 through 0 to 179.9921, gap 179.9921 to 180.0259 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.2 to 90.0) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30599 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30599 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Excluding outliers - 4911 stars left (next iteration limit 5402) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits N_match=4911 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.277 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.266 n_q1=1428 n_q2=1030 n_q3=1429 n_q4=1024 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.130 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-32-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-32-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 04:29:02.81 +84:16:45.8: 12.57 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 03:13:28.31 +84:02:25.1: 12.47 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 03:49:37.10 +83:21:42.5: 12.94 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 07:09:20.09 +85:35:58.1: 12.92 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 03:11:11.26 +83:35:20.1: 13.10 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 05:05:20.21 +83:28:01.5: 13.14 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 04:29:02.81 +84:16:45.8: 12.50 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.53 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:29:02.81 +84:16:45.8: ref_mag=12.53 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7181 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 03:13:28.31 +84:02:25.1: 12.50 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.49 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:13:28.31 +84:02:25.1: ref_mag=12.49 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5855 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 03:49:37.10 +83:21:42.5: 13.01 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 07:09:20.09 +85:35:58.1: 12.92 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 03:11:11.26 +83:35:20.1: 13.08 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.97 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:49:37.10 +83:21:42.5: ref_mag=12.97 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9212 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.92 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.09 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:09:20.09 +85:35:58.1: ref_mag=12.92 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8071 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 01:51:51.39 +86:16:01.9: 13.54 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:11:11.26 +83:35:20.1: ref_mag=13.09 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7941 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 05:05:20.21 +83:28:01.5: 13.07 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.10 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:05:20.21 +83:28:01.5: ref_mag=13.10 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9277 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 05:17:37.20 +84:13:32.4: 13.11 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 01:51:51.39 +86:16:01.9: 13.49 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.51 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:51:51.39 +86:16:01.9: ref_mag=13.51 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3300 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 05:17:37.20 +84:13:32.4: 13.14 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.12 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:17:37.20 +84:13:32.4: ref_mag=13.12 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1654 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90) make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 91166_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 The candidate 91166_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 04.27343    2461256.77343    13.54    02:29:03.39 +82:12:41.1   1071 3233   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits **** FOUND 02:29:03.30 +82:12:41.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 91170_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 The candidate 91170_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 04.27289    2461256.77289    12.69    04:29:03.05 +84:16:45.8   3497 2978   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-32-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 04.27343    2461256.77343    12.75    04:29:02.57 +84:16:45.9   3496 2982   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 91172_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 The candidate 91172_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 04.27343    2461256.77343    11.78    02:46:54.84 +84:36:27.7   2368 3960   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits **** FOUND 02:46:54.49 +84:36:27.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 91748_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 The candidate 91748_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 04.27343    2461256.77343    10.86    08:25:40.72 +88:20:58.3   5342 5422   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 91841_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 The candidate 91841_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 04.27343    2461256.77343    10.61    08:36:00.37 +80:13:38.4   8582 1727   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 91910_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 The candidate 91910_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 04.27343    2461256.77343    11.16    02:51:24.15 +86:10:09.7   3083 4578   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 92136_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 The candidate 92136_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 04.27343    2461256.77343    11.12    09:40:13.60 +81:21:07.1   9109 3340   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 92312_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 The candidate 92312_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 04.27343    2461256.77343    11.69    02:14:00.29 +89:04:51.3   4273 5886   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 92839_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 The candidate 92839_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 04.27343    2461256.77343    12.25    00:27:20.44 +86:54:59.4   2882 5928   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits **** FOUND 00:27:20.72 +86:54:59.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 92996_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 The candidate 92996_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 04.27343    2461256.77343    11.61    06:23:20.14 +80:02:24.5   5520 0248   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 93247_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 The candidate 93247_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 04.27343    2461256.77343    12.03    06:04:09.84 +82:11:29.8   4957 1504   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 93361_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 The candidate 93361_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 04.27343    2461256.77343    12.16    05:07:43.10 +80:48:34.9   3644 0767   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 93766_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 The candidate 93766_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 04.27289    2461256.77289    12.58    03:13:28.14 +84:02:25.2   2426 3436   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-32-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 04.27343    2461256.77343    12.59    03:13:28.49 +84:02:25.0   2426 3440   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 93907_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 The candidate 93907_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 04.27343    2461256.77343    12.61    03:24:03.16 +87:27:41.5   3801 4983   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 94284_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 The candidate 94284_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 04.27343    2461256.77343    12.78    07:29:50.98 +82:24:06.9   6602 2026   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits **** FOUND 07:29:49.61 +82:24:05.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 94289_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 The candidate 94289_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 04.27343    2461256.77343    12.70    04:10:45.34 +80:41:31.0   2309 1129   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits **** FOUND 04:10:45.17 +80:41:31.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 94426_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 The candidate 94426_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 04.27289    2461256.77289    12.89    03:11:11.35 +83:35:20.3   2222 3251   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-32-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 04.27343    2461256.77343    12.73    03:11:11.18 +83:35:19.8   2221 3255   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 94461_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 The candidate 94461_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 04.27289    2461256.77289    12.78    07:09:19.96 +85:35:58.3   5593 3693   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-32-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 04.27343    2461256.77343    12.84    07:09:20.23 +85:35:57.8   5593 3696   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 94568_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 The candidate 94568_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 04.27289    2461256.77289    12.92    03:49:37.03 +83:21:43.4   2681 2758   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-32-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 04.27343    2461256.77343    12.93    03:49:37.18 +83:21:41.6   2680 2762   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 94571_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 The candidate 94571_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 04.27343    2461256.77343    12.97    02:18:54.63 +89:17:29.1   4382 5952   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 94855_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 The candidate 94855_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 04.27289    2461256.77289    12.93    05:05:19.50 +83:28:02.1   3919 2346   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-32-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 04.27343    2461256.77343    12.93    05:05:20.92 +83:28:00.9   3918 2350   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 95044_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 The candidate 95044_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 04.27343    2461256.77343    13.27    23:45:15.50 +88:51:23.0   4035 6232   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits **** FOUND 23:45:13.98 +88:51:22.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 95133_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 The candidate 95133_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 04.27343    2461256.77343    13.52    00:31:46.24 +87:51:37.1   3451 5989   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 95145_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 The candidate 95145_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 04.27343    2461256.77343    13.05    23:17:12.92 +89:36:47.0   4495 6245   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 95333_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 The candidate 95333_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 04.27343    2461256.77343    12.99    04:03:05.37 +81:13:04.8   2288 1496   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits **** FOUND 04:03:05.85 +81:13:03.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 95350_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 The candidate 95350_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 04.27289    2461256.77289    13.32    01:51:51.63 +86:16:02.3   2770 5081   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-32-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 04.27343    2461256.77343    13.34    01:51:51.14 +86:16:01.5   2769 5085   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 95489_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 The candidate 95489_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 04.27343    2461256.77343    13.53    02:55:10.18 +82:23:43.0   1514 2918   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits **** FOUND 02:55:09.14 +82:23:41.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 95504_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 The candidate 95504_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 04.27343    2461256.77343    13.23    06:39:17.78 +87:18:46.6   5052 4615   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits **** FOUND 06:39:17.26 +87:18:46.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 95605_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 The candidate 95605_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 04.27343    2461256.77343    13.23    05:19:00.46 +81:13:21.4   3949 0969   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits **** FOUND 05:19:00.84 +81:13:20.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 95679_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 The candidate 95679_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 04.27289    2461256.77289    13.20    05:17:36.90 +84:13:31.3   4195 2760   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-32-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 04.27343    2461256.77343    13.14    05:17:37.50 +84:13:33.5   4195 2764   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 96031_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 The candidate 96031_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 04.27343    2461256.77343    13.35    02:59:26.53 +85:11:47.9   2739 4094   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits **** FOUND 02:59:25.27 +85:11:49.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 96543_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 The candidate 96543_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 04.27343    2461256.77343    13.71    03:25:34.85 +81:28:42.8   1646 2079   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 96550_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 The candidate 96550_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 04.27343    2461256.77343    13.70    03:52:27.47 +83:46:00.9   2845 2949   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 96657_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 The candidate 96657_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 04.27343    2461256.77343    13.74    07:16:07.91 +84:00:45.3   6005 2830   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 57632_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 The candidate 57632_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 08 04.27343    2461256.77343    12.38    04:21:48.49 +84:46:15.0   3509 3295   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits **** FOUND 04:21:48.71 +84:46:15.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66646_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 The candidate 66646_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 08 04.27343    2461256.77343    10.92    06:23:25.53 +80:04:17.5   5520 0267   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits **** FOUND 06:23:25.56 +80:04:17.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 44223_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 The candidate 44223_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 08 04.27343    2461256.77343    10.22    02:43:16.26 +81:08:13.3   0781 2569   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits **** FOUND 02:43:16.04 +81:08:13.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 48263_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 The candidate 48263_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 08 04.27343    2461256.77343    10.56    04:55:34.58 +80:57:33.9   3381 0919   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits **** FOUND 04:55:34.58 +80:57:34.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 28902_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 The candidate 28902_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 08 04.27343    2461256.77343    6.93    07:31:02.73 +82:24:42.3   6622 2041   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits **** FOUND 07:31:02.83 +82:24:42.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 29091_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 The candidate 29091_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 08 04.27343    2461256.77343    6.71    08:04:46.52 +79:28:45.2   8183 0865   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits **** FOUND 08:04:46.49 +79:28:45.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 03297_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 The candidate 03297_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 08 04.27343    2461256.77343    6.66    09:37:03.68 +81:19:37.5   9081 3271   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_014115_TTUQ1b1x1_1999908_cbC0zxg2/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_01-33-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0247.fits **** FOUND 09:37:03.61 +81:19:37.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### ########### Completed Cam-01-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### ################################################################################### renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461256.77288792 -observatory V36 07:35:24.44 +20:18:04.0 Mercury (-0.1mag) 11:48:42.18 +00:53:10.2 Venus (-4.3mag) 05:37:45.25 +23:28:25.9 Mars (1.3mag) 08:39:22.52 +18:54:24.4 Jupiter (-1.8mag) 00:56:39.07 +03:17:59.4 Saturn (0.6mag) 04:11:15.19 +20:55:42.8 Uranus (5.8mag) 00:16:18.96 +00:14:44.5 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:28:31.28 -23:28:38.1 Pluto (14.4mag) 01:04:33.78 +10:23:32.9 Moon (-11.0mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 Aug 4 01:43 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461256.77288792: 08:39:30.12 +18:53:53.0 Io (6.0mag) 08:39:25.49 +18:54:13.1 Europa (6.3mag) 08:39:09.69 +18:55:18.6 Ganymede (5.6mag) 08:38:57.19 +18:56:12.2 Callisto (6.7mag) 08:37:00.85 +18:51:24.4 Himalia (15.7mag) 08:39:20.94 +18:54:31.7 Thebe (16.6mag) 08:36:30.20 +18:50:42.8 Elara (17.7mag) 08:43:27.22 +18:35:45.1 Pasiphae (17.9mag) 08:42:48.98 +19:03:50.3 Carme (19.0mag) 00:56:45.80 +03:18:15.8 Titan (8.4mag) 00:56:43.90 +03:17:52.0 Rhea (9.7mag) 00:56:37.06 +03:16:02.5 Iapetus (11.1mag) 00:56:32.20 +03:18:26.3 Hyperion (14.4mag) 00:56:06.64 +03:11:41.7 Phoebe (16.5mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Aug 4 01:43 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461256.77288792: 18:48:06.30 -24:57:59.8 JWST 18:21:25.45 +25:09:07.0 Chandra 09:48:16.52 -55:10:02.9 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Aug 4 01:43 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461256.77288792 -observatory V36 03:09:06.00 +17:02:10.6 17.7mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 18:03:05.41 -34:38:51.0 13.9mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 06:50:04.81 -68:45:35.0 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:08:44.70 +32:54:40.4 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 03:31:39.08 +35:44:17.6 16.6mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 22:41:51.31 +31:40:09.7 17.3mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 06:39:30.10 +26:36:27.8 16.8mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 10:17:55.14 +28:38:52.5 17.0mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 09:26:12.65 +05:17:15.2 17.9mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 15:11:53.13 -12:08:06.0 17.9mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS) 21:16:03.41 +66:25:28.8 17.9mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon) 15:52:02.95 -12:33:53.4 14.3mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 08:03:36.23 +31:10:06.2 15.2mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:07:40.56 +15:37:10.2 17.7mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 19:08:11.91 +42:49:19.2 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 21:16:29.35 +48:56:08.9 17.6mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS) 05:11:55.10 -13:01:25.7 15.5mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 06:53:35.88 +24:50:52.5 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 07:29:03.39 -15:36:29.8 17.6mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS) 10:27:27.70 +21:09:00.8 17.3mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 12:55:49.35 +02:36:26.1 17.0mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 16:04:44.96 +78:11:14.8 16.9mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 03:05:50.55 +46:06:00.8 17.1mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 11:43:34.28 +08:06:50.9 17.2mag A/2026 E1 21:53:50.33 -25:36:35.0 6.9mag 10P/Tempel 11:26:37.33 -03:09:35.6 16.2mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 04:34:17.19 +32:04:45.4 18.0mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson 10:59:37.25 +05:56:07.6 17.2mag 63P/Wild 00:54:17.80 -05:18:59.7 15.5mag 65P/Gunn 05:26:31.36 +20:44:55.4 13.7mag 78P/Gehrels 20:41:33.32 -23:03:38.8 17.9mag 84P/Giclas 02:56:38.37 +13:22:53.2 16.6mag 88P/Howell 07:45:40.39 +28:10:48.7 16.1mag 93P/Lovas 03:55:20.52 +15:20:36.9 17.7mag 112P/Urata-Niijima 05:43:23.41 +30:41:16.2 16.4mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 09:09:05.62 +27:18:18.3 15.0mag 123P/West-Hartley 11:35:52.40 -08:44:33.7 17.1mag 124P/Mrkos 05:30:40.60 +21:11:12.7 16.1mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 06:21:41.72 +19:04:57.7 17.9mag 131P/Mueller 00:03:55.10 +03:25:46.5 17.6mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma 03:21:57.44 -19:49:33.5 14.1mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 07:02:24.88 +37:33:21.4 15.8mag 162P/SidingSpring 16:21:15.25 +37:37:57.1 12.5mag 169P/NEAT 02:35:34.58 +09:25:24.8 17.6mag 220P/McNaught 16:39:42.11 -09:48:21.6 17.6mag 235P/LINEAR 20:25:08.37 -52:49:22.9 17.8mag 259P/Garradd 03:10:35.81 +23:28:38.1 15.4mag 260P/McNaught 06:53:24.62 +37:46:36.3 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR 15:09:17.78 +03:34:16.6 17.7mag 391P/Kowalski 08:57:16.61 +18:34:05.8 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS 08:29:51.35 +37:04:55.5 18.0mag 493P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.5K Aug 4 01:43 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09 01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97 21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13 18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06 12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98 13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38 18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63 14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15 20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53 19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82 19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31 17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67 19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52 18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92 19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91 19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81 04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96 13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01 16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07 10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63 14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62 13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09 00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13 11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56 21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14 17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72 14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53 20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4 15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57 23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64 17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15 00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20 AT2026ntk 2026-06-18.09 17.34 20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93 23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83 02:02:26.78 +32:04:21.30 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.59 15.39 21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05 17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62 13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24 00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22 14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32 12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69 12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02 10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75 13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58 00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58 01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70 SN 2026obc 2026-06-7.43 15.15 21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90 ASASSN-26dr 2026-06-7.24 16.24 06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00 ASASSN-26ds 2026-06-2.97 15.02 20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12 11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63 11:44:33.11 -68:48:32.90 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24.03 8.35 19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28 14:23:56.59 -58:37:47.40 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.59 11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46 21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86 00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34 15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44 11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55 13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96 02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37 17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7 01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8 16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8 09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63 21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9 14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21 14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89 12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5 13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23 09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51 15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.80 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.34 13.72 10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52 22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2 21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51 16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.15 15.93 14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63 13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43 11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59 22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Aug 4 01:43 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4 PNV J00425120+4116594 2022-10-26.135 19.3mag 12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0 TCP J12242510+2847120 2026-05-31.6015 14.8mag 00:56:07.13 +43:01:40.6 TCP J00560713+4301406 2026-06-01.4135 12.2mag 00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2 PNV J00424164+4115162 2026-06-02.029 17.4mag 00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2 PNV J00423868+4115582 2026-06-05.1224 19.97Umag 19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7 PNV J19004295-4831017 2026-05-25.0752 14.2mag 09:55:21.28 +69:02:52.6 PNV J09552128+6902526 2026-06-13.933 18.9mag 19:51:21.42 +37:06:40.0 TCP J19512142+3706400 2026-06-17.2942 16.8mag 19:57:03.87 +37:41:46.4 TCP J19570387+3741464 2026-06-18.2638 17.5mag 00:42:32.04 +41:10:28.3 PNV J00423204+4110283 2026-06-26.059 16.6mag 02:19:17.36 +28:57:15.8 TCP J02191736+2857158 2026-07-12.3549 12.5mag 00:44:56.43 +41:57:41.6 PNV J00445643+4157416 2026-07-13.8026 17.98Cmag 00:42:55.36 +41:17:27.0 PNV J00425536+4117270 2026-07-20.1813 17.7mag 20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9 TCP J20354364+6131329 2026-07-20.5443 14.4mag 21:17:31.48 +22:25:51.0 TCP J21173148+2225510 2026-07-23.5577 14.8mag 00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8 PNV J00412404+4049028 2026-07-25.0157 18.7mag 00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6 PNV J00430426+4102286 2026-07-26.1512 20mag 14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0 TCP J14515140+6613240 2026-07-29.2561 13.5mag 00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2 PNV J00430615+4122082 2026-07-30.0085 19.4mag 00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2 PNV J00413323+4110122 2026-08-02.8913 17.1mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 189K Aug 4 01:43 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 00:30:19.249 +18:24:23.83 AT 2026uvg 2026-07-03.45 20.3378 02:34:07.458 +16:36:44.86 AT 2026uvf 2026-07-08.47 20.1237 05:51:16.620 -53:34:27.66 SN 2026uve 2026-07-14.17 17.677 14:40:13.463 -21:42:28.05 AT 2026uvd 2026-07-15.38 19.23 15:23:59.541 -29:29:57.56 AT 2026uvc 2026-07-15.38 20.26 14:05:43.115 -39:08:24.01 AT 2026uvb 2026-07-15.39 19.73 13:43:05.573 -20:04:24.22 AT 2026uva 2026-07-15.37 19.18 15:22:34.470 -05:37:40.51 AT 2026uuz 2026-07-15.39 19.82 16:09:54.586 +00:47:42.41 AT 2026uuy 2026-07-15.44 20.09 19:33:35.563 -39:15:48.22 AT 2026uux 2026-07-14.41 20.62 00:40:10.620 -43:16:14.80 AT 2026uuw 2026-06-26.42 21.69 01:06:29.115 +11:42:11.17 AT 2026uuv 2026-07-11.21 20.08 16:51:06.135 +20:55:05.41 AT 2026uuu 2026-07-10.91 20.4 13:34:34.622 +55:47:04.76 AT 2026uut 2026-07-14.76 19.13 13:51:15.996 +56:24:21.13 AT 2026uus 2026-07-14.76 19.68 15:20:47.992 +45:03:38.57 AT 2026uur 2026-07-14.77 19.22 17:15:43.403 +47:21:24.62 AT 2026uuq 2026-07-14.76 19.19 17:01:52.196 +41:26:22.21 AT 2026uup 2026-07-14.78 19.77 15:45:07.966 +53:24:05.89 AT 2026uuo 2026-07-14.82 19.85 17:58:55.437 +44:40:19.09 AT 2026uun 2026-07-14.88 18.67 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 88K Aug 4 01:43 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 95 C - WARNING