This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001310_TTUQ1b1x1_774383_exTdfjsy
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 04.2125 2461256.7125 12.48 20:44:54.25 -25:31:56.9
19.60273 -35.31616 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 6.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.388 Charybdis -1 -0 1 12.6 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:44:54.25 -25:31:56.9: 14.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:44:54.25 -25:31:56.9: 14.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 04.2125* 20 44 54.25 -25 31 56.9 12.5 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461256.7125,12.48,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260804.2125 12.48CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 04.2125 2461256.7125 12.45 20:43:16.76 -30:37:18.6
13.41927 -36.25314 galactic Mic Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 6.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.769 Tatjana -0 3 3 12.7 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:43:16.76 -30:37:18.6: 14.53 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:43:16.76 -30:37:18.6: 14.53 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 04.2125* 20 43 16.76 -30 37 18.6 12.4 U Mic 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461256.7125,12.45,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260804.2125 12.45CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 04.2125 2461256.7125 13.36 21:23:13.17 -23:03:33.1
25.81410 -43.01090 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.2" and 6.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.752 Sulamitis 0 2 2 13.7 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 21:23:13.17 -23:03:33.1: 14.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 21:23:13.17 -23:03:33.1: 14.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 04.2125* 21 23 13.17 -23 03 33.1 13.4 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461256.7125,13.36,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260804.2125 13.36CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 04.2125 2461256.7125 13.51 20:45:01.05 -25:36:13.3
19.52771 -35.36067 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 6.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.325 Heidelberga -2 2 2 13.6 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:45:01.05 -25:36:13.3: 14.63 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:45:01.05 -25:36:13.3: 14.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 04.2125* 20 45 01.05 -25 36 13.3 13.5 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461256.7125,13.51,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260804.2125 13.51CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 04.2125 2461256.7125 10.82 21:05:27.32 -24:06:37.7
22.96033 -39.39647 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 6.3 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASAS J210527-2406.7
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.770 V Y 0.270 V 2452103.20000 104.843781000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 21:05:27.32 -24:06:37.7: 11.82 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 21:05:27.32 -24:06:37.7: 11.88 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.85 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 04.2125* 21 05 27.32 -24 06 37.7 10.8 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J210527-2406.7,2461256.7125,10.82,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J210527-2406.7 20260804.2125 10.82CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461235.76400824 14.07.2026 06:20:00.312 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits
First image: 2461235.76400824 14.07.2026 06:20:00.312 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits
Last image: 2461256.71284355 04.08.2026 05:06:19.683 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001310_TTUQ1b1x1_774383_exTdfjsy/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 17
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.35
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 4151
Objects passed selection criteria: 4145
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 3876.75
Average stars matched: 3752.25 (96.7885 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 230700 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jul 29 18:03:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-187-gf9db235a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-29)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Aug 4 00:15:49 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461235.76400824 14.07.2026 06:20:00.312 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits
First image: 2461235.76400824 14.07.2026 06:20:00.312 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits
Last image: 2461256.71284355 04.08.2026 05:06:19.683 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001310_TTUQ1b1x1_774383_exTdfjsy/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 71
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.01
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 10 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 29038
Objects passed selection criteria: 28970
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 24982.8
Average stars matched: 24027.8 (96.1774 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 252504 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jul 29 18:03:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-187-gf9db235a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-29)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Aug 4 00:16:46 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001310_TTUQ1b1x1_774383_exTdfjsy/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-05-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001310_TTUQ1b1x1_774383_exTdfjsy/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001310_TTUQ1b1x1_774383_exTdfjsy/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-05-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001310_TTUQ1b1x1_774383_exTdfjsy/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461256.71223509
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'asassn_transients_list.txt' -> '../asassn_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits'
wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits'
wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-05-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-05-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-05-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-05-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits'
wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:07:12.109 -25:59:54.08 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-05-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-05-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:07:05.219 -26:00:28.63 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 21:07:12.109 -25:59:54.08
Second-epoch image center 21:07:05.219 -26:00:28.63
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0275 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:07:07.954 -26:00:33.62 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 21:07:12.109 -25:59:54.08
Second-epoch image center 21:07:07.954 -26:00:33.62
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0190 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 21:07:05.219 -26:00:28.63
Second-epoch second image center 21:07:07.954 -26:00:33.62
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01034 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dA5JhWqdJ2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits &> /tmp/tmp.K2RyRAmOmO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001310_TTUQ1b1x1_774383_exTdfjsy/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-05-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7lIkNb6dI0
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001310_TTUQ1b1x1_774383_exTdfjsy/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-05-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001310_TTUQ1b1x1_774383_exTdfjsy/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits &> /tmp/tmp.yppyBoQCqM
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001310_TTUQ1b1x1_774383_exTdfjsy/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits and wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits and wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits and wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 4103 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 307.7791 to 325.8207 deg, Dec -31.2640 to -20.5569 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 307.7791 to 325.8207 deg, Dec -31.2640 to -20.5569 deg
Loaded 7074 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2509 out of 2559 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2559 out of 4103 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.357300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.357300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.35
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.01
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.01
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 4103 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 307.7791 to 325.8207 deg, Dec -31.2640 to -20.5569 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 307.7791 to 325.8207 deg, Dec -31.2640 to -20.5569 deg
Loaded 7074 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2509 out of 2559 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2559 out of 4103 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits (aperture=6.5)
Read 4114 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 307.7791 to 325.8210 deg, Dec -31.2636 to -20.5567 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 307.7791 to 325.8210 deg, Dec -31.2636 to -20.5567 deg
Loaded 7074 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2500 out of 2554 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2554 out of 4114 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits (aperture=6.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 15 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits
2.4 pix Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
3.9 pix fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-05-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
3.9 pix fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.0 mag. Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits
14.0 mag. Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
13.5 mag. fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-05-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
13.5 mag. fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.5 (SNR ) 11.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.dA5JhWqdJ2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-04_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001310_TTUQ1b1x1_774383_exTdfjsy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=324, bad_region=0, passed=4103
Got 4103 stars (including 3776 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4103 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3684 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3677 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3677 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3677 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4103 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3687 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3678 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4103 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3678 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4103 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 3678 stars left (next iteration limit 4044)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits N_match=3678 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.476 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.432 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.512 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.525 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.445 n_q1=1018 n_q2=805 n_q3=1055 n_q4=800 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.102
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits -region wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.K2RyRAmOmO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-04_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001310_TTUQ1b1x1_774383_exTdfjsy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=328, bad_region=0, passed=4114
Got 4114 stars (including 3785 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4114 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3692 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3683 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3683 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3683 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4114 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3694 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3684 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4114 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3684 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4114 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 3684 stars left (next iteration limit 4051)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits N_match=3684 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.508 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.450 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.537 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.583 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.475 n_q1=1044 n_q2=793 n_q3=1056 n_q4=791 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.148
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits -region wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.7lIkNb6dI0 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-04_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001310_TTUQ1b1x1_774383_exTdfjsy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001310_TTUQ1b1x1_774383_exTdfjsy/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-05-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001310_TTUQ1b1x1_774383_exTdfjsy/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-05-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001310_TTUQ1b1x1_774383_exTdfjsy/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-05-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001310_TTUQ1b1x1_774383_exTdfjsy/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-05-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001310_TTUQ1b1x1_774383_exTdfjsy/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-05-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001310_TTUQ1b1x1_774383_exTdfjsy/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-05-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-05-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-05-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-05-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-05-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-05-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-05-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-05-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001310_TTUQ1b1x1_774383_exTdfjsy/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-05-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-05-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=196, bad_region=0, passed=3683
Got 3683 stars (including 3484 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-05-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3683 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3397 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3389 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3389 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3389 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3683 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3398 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3390 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3683 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3390 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3683 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 3390 stars left (next iteration limit 3727)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3390 robust_rms=9.302 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=17.539 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3390 robust_rms=0.496 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.578 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3390 robust_rms=0.424 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.525 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3390 robust_rms_before=0.894 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.374 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.424 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.467 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.525
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.467 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-05-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits N_match=3390 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.453 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.438 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.315 n_q1=855 n_q2=635 n_q3=1115 n_q4=785 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.249
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-05-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-05-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001310_TTUQ1b1x1_774383_exTdfjsy/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-05-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-05-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-05-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.yppyBoQCqM (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-04_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001310_TTUQ1b1x1_774383_exTdfjsy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001310_TTUQ1b1x1_774383_exTdfjsy/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001310_TTUQ1b1x1_774383_exTdfjsy/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001310_TTUQ1b1x1_774383_exTdfjsy/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001310_TTUQ1b1x1_774383_exTdfjsy/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001310_TTUQ1b1x1_774383_exTdfjsy/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001310_TTUQ1b1x1_774383_exTdfjsy/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001310_TTUQ1b1x1_774383_exTdfjsy/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=199, bad_region=0, passed=3680
Got 3680 stars (including 3479 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3680 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3395 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3388 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3388 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3388 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3680 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3397 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3390 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3680 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3390 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3680 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 3390 stars left (next iteration limit 3726)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3390 robust_rms=9.504 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=17.145 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3390 robust_rms=0.481 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.511 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3390 robust_rms=0.419 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.522 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=3390 robust_rms_before=0.880 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.380 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.481 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.455 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.511
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.455 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits N_match=3390 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.455 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.449 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.332 n_q1=850 n_q2=633 n_q3=1122 n_q4=785 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.210
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001310_TTUQ1b1x1_774383_exTdfjsy/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits sigma_overall=0.476 worst_q_ratio=1.102
ref2=Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits sigma_overall=0.508 worst_q_ratio=1.148
new1=fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-05-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits sigma_overall=0.362 worst_q_ratio=1.249
new2=fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits sigma_overall=0.376 worst_q_ratio=1.210
reference average sigma_overall=0.492 worst_q_ratio=1.125
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224_astrometric_residuals.png (3678 matched stars from wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.42 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225_astrometric_residuals.png (3684 matched stars from wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.45 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-05-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160_astrometric_residuals.png (3390 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-05-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161_astrometric_residuals.png (3390 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-05-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-05-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001310_TTUQ1b1x1_774383_exTdfjsy/wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-05-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001310_TTUQ1b1x1_774383_exTdfjsy/wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:35:01.82 -25:18:59.3: 11.30 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:58:25.38 -21:11:38.0: 11.44 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 21:13:57.63 -26:28:43.7: 11.36 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 21:04:59.79 -20:52:19.7: 11.57 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 21:07:17.31 -22:18:40.9: 11.43 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:48:09.71 -20:55:09.1: 11.59 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:43:47.21 -22:28:56.3: 11.01 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 21:05:27.32 -24:06:37.6: 11.65 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:58:35.00 -21:30:44.5: 11.43 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:51:41.54 -22:36:25.4: 11.41 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 21:13:57.63 -26:28:43.7: 11.38 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:35:01.82 -25:18:59.3: 11.29 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:43:47.21 -22:28:56.3: 10.95 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 21:04:59.79 -20:52:19.7: 11.60 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.37 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:48:09.71 -20:55:09.1: 11.64 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:58:25.38 -21:11:38.0: 11.54 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 21:07:17.31 -22:18:40.9: 11.40 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 21:05:27.32 -24:06:37.6: 11.68 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:13:57.63 -26:28:43.7: ref_mag=11.37 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.9226 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.30 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.98 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.58 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:35:01.82 -25:18:59.3: ref_mag=11.30 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.0771 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:43:47.21 -22:28:56.3: ref_mag=10.98 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.9143 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.62 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.48 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.41 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:04:59.79 -20:52:19.7: ref_mag=11.58 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=10.8761 delta=0.71 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.66 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:48:09.71 -20:55:09.1: ref_mag=11.62 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=10.9345 delta=0.68 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:58:25.38 -21:11:38.0: ref_mag=11.48 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.0424 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:07:17.31 -22:18:40.9: ref_mag=11.41 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.1162 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 21:05:27.32 -24:06:37.6: ref_mag=11.66 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=10.7018 delta=0.96 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:58:35.00 -21:30:44.5: 11.43 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.43 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:51:41.54 -22:36:25.4: 11.40 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:58:35.00 -21:30:44.5: ref_mag=11.43 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.2075 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.41 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:51:41.54 -22:36:25.4: ref_mag=11.41 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.1997 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 21:20:26.80 -27:24:21.4: 11.49 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 21:20:26.80 -27:24:21.4: 11.45 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.46 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:20:26.80 -27:24:21.4: ref_mag=11.46 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.1805 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out20313.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20241_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 20241_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20295_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 20295_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:07:36.60 -23:55:14.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20311_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 20311_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:45:43.04 -22:51:39.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20313_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 20313_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:05:27.32 -24:06:37.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=10.71, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=11.69)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.614 6804267205288808576 316.36390113016 -24.11028565980 9.6865 8.3177 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.614#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20324_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 20324_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20327_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 20327_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20328_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 20328_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20338_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 20338_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20345_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 20345_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20360_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 20360_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20364_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 20364_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20367_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 20367_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20371_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 20371_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 00533_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 00533_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:26:43.93 -29:51:04.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01403_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 01403_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:54:26.46 -27:44:16.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cap-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001310_TTUQ1b1x1_774383_exTdfjsy/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-05-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001310_TTUQ1b1x1_774383_exTdfjsy/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001310_TTUQ1b1x1_774383_exTdfjsy/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-05-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001310_TTUQ1b1x1_774383_exTdfjsy/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-05-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-05-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:07:12.109 -25:59:54.08 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-05-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-05-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:07:05.219 -26:00:28.63 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 21:07:12.109 -25:59:54.08
Second-epoch image center 21:07:05.219 -26:00:28.63
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0275 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:07:07.954 -26:00:33.62 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 21:07:12.109 -25:59:54.08
Second-epoch image center 21:07:07.954 -26:00:33.62
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0190 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 21:07:05.219 -26:00:28.63
Second-epoch second image center 21:07:07.954 -26:00:33.62
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01034 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wUmJd6Zm3o
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits &> /tmp/tmp.TOaNIW1EHZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001310_TTUQ1b1x1_774383_exTdfjsy/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-05-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uSSyyBeKd9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001310_TTUQ1b1x1_774383_exTdfjsy/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-05-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001310_TTUQ1b1x1_774383_exTdfjsy/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RqTrlITCk0
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001310_TTUQ1b1x1_774383_exTdfjsy/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits and wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits and wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits and wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 30382 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 307.7565 to 325.8970 deg, Dec -31.2695 to -20.5327 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 307.7565 to 325.8970 deg, Dec -31.2695 to -20.5327 deg
Loaded 7141 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4303 out of 4524 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4524 out of 30382 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.175900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.175900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.01
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.17
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.17
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 30382 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 307.7565 to 325.8970 deg, Dec -31.2695 to -20.5327 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 307.7565 to 325.8970 deg, Dec -31.2695 to -20.5327 deg
Loaded 7141 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4303 out of 4524 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4524 out of 30382 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits (aperture=4.8)
Read 30781 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 307.7566 to 325.8990 deg, Dec -31.2689 to -20.5327 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 307.7566 to 325.8990 deg, Dec -31.2689 to -20.5327 deg
Loaded 7140 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4271 out of 4495 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4495 out of 30781 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits (aperture=4.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 64 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits
2.1 pix Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
3.5 pix fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-05-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
3.5 pix fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.2 mag. Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits
14.2 mag. Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
13.7 mag. fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-05-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
13.6 mag. fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.6 (SNR ) 13.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.wUmJd6Zm3o (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-04_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001310_TTUQ1b1x1_774383_exTdfjsy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=1095, bad_region=0, passed=30372
Got 30372 stars (including 29237 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30372 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4863 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4854 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4854 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4854 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30372 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4865 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4856 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30372 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4856 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30372 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 4856 stars left (next iteration limit 5339)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits N_match=4856 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.458 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.501 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.512 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.440 n_q1=1373 n_q2=1080 n_q3=1279 n_q4=1124 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.117
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits -region wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.TOaNIW1EHZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-04_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001310_TTUQ1b1x1_774383_exTdfjsy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=1095, bad_region=1, passed=30767
Got 30767 stars (including 29632 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30767 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4871 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4859 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4860 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4859 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30767 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4873 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30767 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30767 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 4860 stars left (next iteration limit 5344)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits N_match=4860 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.494 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.530 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.559 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.461 n_q1=1382 n_q2=1083 n_q3=1276 n_q4=1119 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.131
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits -region wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.uSSyyBeKd9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-04_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001310_TTUQ1b1x1_774383_exTdfjsy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001310_TTUQ1b1x1_774383_exTdfjsy/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-05-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001310_TTUQ1b1x1_774383_exTdfjsy/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-05-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001310_TTUQ1b1x1_774383_exTdfjsy/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-05-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001310_TTUQ1b1x1_774383_exTdfjsy/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-05-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001310_TTUQ1b1x1_774383_exTdfjsy/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-05-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001310_TTUQ1b1x1_774383_exTdfjsy/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-05-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-05-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-05-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-05-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-05-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-05-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-05-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-05-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001310_TTUQ1b1x1_774383_exTdfjsy/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-05-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-05-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=606, bad_region=1, passed=19853
Got 19853 stars (including 19226 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-05-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 19853 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4879 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4865 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4865 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4865 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19853 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4881 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4868 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19853 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4867 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19853 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 4867 stars left (next iteration limit 5351)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-05-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-05-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits N_match=4867 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.506 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.508 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.348 n_q1=1233 n_q2=920 n_q3=1578 n_q4=1136 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.239
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-05-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-05-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001310_TTUQ1b1x1_774383_exTdfjsy/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-05-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-05-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-05-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.RqTrlITCk0 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-04_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001310_TTUQ1b1x1_774383_exTdfjsy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001310_TTUQ1b1x1_774383_exTdfjsy/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001310_TTUQ1b1x1_774383_exTdfjsy/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001310_TTUQ1b1x1_774383_exTdfjsy/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001310_TTUQ1b1x1_774383_exTdfjsy/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001310_TTUQ1b1x1_774383_exTdfjsy/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001310_TTUQ1b1x1_774383_exTdfjsy/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001310_TTUQ1b1x1_774383_exTdfjsy/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=675, bad_region=0, passed=19714
Got 19714 stars (including 19010 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 19714 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4878 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4866 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19714 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4880 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4868 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19714 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4867 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19714 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 4867 stars left (next iteration limit 5352)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits is a symbolic link - not rewriting the WCS of whatever it points to, keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits N_match=4867 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.502 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.486 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.360 n_q1=1233 n_q2=911 n_q3=1586 n_q4=1137 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.203
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001310_TTUQ1b1x1_774383_exTdfjsy/fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-05-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001310_TTUQ1b1x1_774383_exTdfjsy/wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-05-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-04_CI_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_001310_TTUQ1b1x1_774383_exTdfjsy/wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:43:30.89 -22:27:51.3: 12.24 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:43:16.76 -30:37:18.6: 14.53 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:39:41.16 -20:56:54.5: 11.86 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:35:01.14 -25:18:56.6: 11.53 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:38:20.10 -20:58:08.9: 13.21 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 21:06:56.94 -24:59:33.7: 10.82 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:54:56.27 -22:18:30.3: 12.18 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:59:15.50 -21:22:23.6: 12.64 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:44:54.25 -25:31:56.9: 14.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 21:12:59.42 -22:49:14.8: 12.91 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 21:12:59.42 -22:49:14.8: 12.91 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:43:30.89 -22:27:51.3: 12.20 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:59:15.50 -21:22:23.6: 12.68 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:39:41.16 -20:56:54.5: 11.94 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:38:20.10 -20:58:08.9: 13.35 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:44:54.25 -25:31:56.9: 14.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 21:06:56.94 -24:59:33.7: 10.83 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:35:01.14 -25:18:56.6: 11.49 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:54:56.27 -22:18:30.3: 12.13 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:43:16.76 -30:37:18.6: 14.53 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.91 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.27 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.66 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.90 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.22 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.82 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.51 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:59:15.50 -21:22:23.6: ref_mag=12.66 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.6440 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:12:59.42 -22:49:14.8: ref_mag=12.91 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3255 delta=-0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:39:41.16 -20:56:54.5: ref_mag=11.90 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.1866 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:38:20.10 -20:58:08.9: ref_mag=13.27 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.2556 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.15 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:43:30.89 -22:27:51.3: ref_mag=12.22 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.2626 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:06:56.94 -24:59:33.7: ref_mag=10.82 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.8324 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:35:01.14 -25:18:56.6: ref_mag=11.51 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.7700 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:54:56.27 -22:18:30.3: ref_mag=12.15 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4196 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:38:29.37 -21:44:39.5: 13.32 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:36:48.28 -21:18:53.9: 14.04 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:38:09.04 -20:40:22.6: 13.66 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 21:00:48.72 -21:22:23.8: 12.53 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:39:12.67 -20:41:14.2: 13.75 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:43:20.29 -20:45:50.4: 13.77 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:42:46.61 -21:51:21.9: 13.70 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:45:15.49 -22:15:34.1: 13.88 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:38:29.37 -21:44:39.5: 13.15 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.22 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:38:29.37 -21:44:39.5: ref_mag=13.22 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.2073 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:36:48.28 -21:18:53.9: 13.39 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:38:09.04 -20:40:22.6: 13.62 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:36:48.28 -21:18:53.9: ref_mag=13.54 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.4688 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:43:20.29 -20:45:50.4: 13.83 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:39:12.67 -20:41:14.2: 13.41 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:45:15.49 -22:15:34.1: 14.10 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:42:46.61 -21:51:21.9: 13.79 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 21:00:48.72 -21:22:23.8: 12.71 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:38:09.04 -20:40:22.6: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.2997 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.74 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.60 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:39:12.67 -20:41:14.2: ref_mag=13.54 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.2234 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:42:46.61 -21:51:21.9: ref_mag=13.74 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.4059 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:45:15.49 -22:15:34.1: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.2825 delta=0.68 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:00:48.72 -21:22:23.8: ref_mag=12.60 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2008 delta=-0.60 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:43:20.29 -20:45:50.4: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.4467 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:38:53.85 -21:52:02.0: 13.56 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:43:02.45 -22:41:15.5: 13.56 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:39:37.84 -20:59:06.5: 13.89 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:37:19.33 -20:38:21.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:39:18.34 -21:05:11.1: 13.64 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:51:25.69 -21:18:33.3: 13.94 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:37:10.36 -21:38:31.9: 13.72 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:45:25.63 -22:16:13.3: 13.51 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:38:53.85 -21:52:02.0: 13.71 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.62 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:43:02.45 -22:41:15.5: 13.68 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:38:53.85 -21:52:02.0: ref_mag=13.62 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.4661 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.61 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:43:02.45 -22:41:15.5: ref_mag=13.61 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.4513 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:39:37.84 -20:59:06.5: 13.53 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.65 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:39:37.84 -20:59:06.5: ref_mag=13.65 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.6142 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:39:18.34 -21:05:11.1: 13.69 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:37:10.36 -21:38:31.9: 13.93 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:51:25.69 -21:18:33.3: 13.79 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:45:25.63 -22:16:13.3: 13.59 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:37:19.33 -20:38:21.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:37:19.33 -20:38:21.5: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.66 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.55 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:37:10.36 -21:38:31.9: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.5292 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:51:25.69 -21:18:33.3: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.4309 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:39:18.34 -21:05:11.1: ref_mag=13.66 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.5813 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:45:25.63 -22:16:13.3: ref_mag=13.55 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.4377 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:38:09.37 -22:47:37.5: 13.56 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:35:11.18 -24:32:59.7: 13.69 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 21:23:13.17 -23:03:33.1: 14.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:35:23.72 -21:14:34.4: 13.96 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:44:35.07 -21:33:56.8: 14.11 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:39:13.81 -21:15:14.3: 13.85 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:47:05.18 -22:35:59.0: 14.08 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 21:01:13.52 -22:43:52.2: 13.88 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:38:09.37 -22:47:37.5: 13.75 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:35:11.18 -24:32:59.7: 13.69 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:38:09.37 -22:47:37.5: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.4809 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.69 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:35:11.18 -24:32:59.7: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.4834 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:35:23.72 -21:14:34.4: 13.80 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 21:23:13.17 -23:03:33.1: 14.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:44:35.07 -21:33:56.8: 14.07 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:39:13.81 -21:15:14.3: 13.88 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 21:01:13.52 -22:43:52.2: 14.07 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:35:23.72 -21:14:34.4: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.5288 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.09 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:44:35.07 -21:33:56.8: ref_mag=14.09 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=13.7103 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.86 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:39:13.81 -21:15:14.3: ref_mag=13.86 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.5562 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:01:13.52 -22:43:52.2: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.5601 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:47:05.18 -22:35:59.0: 14.17 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.12 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:47:05.18 -22:35:59.0: ref_mag=14.12 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.4846 delta=0.64 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:44:06.64 -20:57:38.8: 13.71 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:40:36.99 -21:07:33.9: 13.95 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:42:59.63 -22:43:41.5: 14.25 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:37:51.02 -20:43:28.5: 13.64 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:45:04.72 -21:32:47.7: 13.75 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:44:33.51 -21:32:13.2: 13.84 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:47:19.34 -20:55:35.8: 13.88 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:44:06.64 -20:57:38.8: 13.77 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.74 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:44:06.64 -20:57:38.8: ref_mag=13.74 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.7022 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:45:04.72 -21:32:47.7: 13.91 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.82 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:40:36.99 -21:07:33.9: 14.18 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:45:04.72 -21:32:47.7: ref_mag=13.82 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.6581 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:42:59.63 -22:43:41.5: 13.91 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:37:51.02 -20:43:28.5: 13.70 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:44:33.51 -21:32:13.2: 13.61 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:40:36.99 -21:07:33.9: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=13.7424 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:42:59.63 -22:43:41.5: ref_mag=14.02 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.5964 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:37:51.02 -20:43:28.5: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.6384 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.70 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:44:33.51 -21:32:13.2: ref_mag=13.70 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.6791 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:47:19.34 -20:55:35.8: 14.02 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.94 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:47:19.34 -20:55:35.8: ref_mag=13.94 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.6599 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:44:17.16 -21:07:30.3: 13.90 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:47:11.82 -21:00:49.4: 13.78 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:43:05.49 -20:46:13.7: 13.68 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 21:03:36.79 -21:35:58.0: 14.04 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:39:17.35 -22:39:57.1: 13.62 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:43:43.40 -20:49:10.3: 13.87 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:45:18.51 -22:19:16.8: 13.80 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:44:17.16 -21:07:30.3: 13.96 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.92 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:44:17.16 -21:07:30.3: ref_mag=13.92 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.5514 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:47:11.82 -21:00:49.4: 14.10 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:47:11.82 -21:00:49.4: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.7734 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 21:03:36.79 -21:35:58.0: 14.12 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:39:17.35 -22:39:57.1: 13.68 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.08 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:43:43.40 -20:49:10.3: 14.36 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:43:05.49 -20:46:13.7: 13.66 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:03:36.79 -21:35:58.0: ref_mag=14.08 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.6194 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:39:17.35 -22:39:57.1: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.6173 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.01 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:43:43.40 -20:49:10.3: ref_mag=14.01 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.7599 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:43:05.49 -20:46:13.7: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.7770 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:45:18.51 -22:19:16.8: 13.89 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:45:18.51 -22:19:16.8: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.5650 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:37:11.28 -21:13:56.5: 13.63 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:51:38.66 -25:11:34.1: 14.05 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:50:05.52 -20:58:33.5: 13.53 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:39:40.83 -21:50:45.9: 13.88 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 21:07:28.83 -22:50:09.0: 14.13 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:45:01.05 -25:36:13.3: 14.63 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:57:43.78 -22:15:01.7: 14.29 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:37:11.28 -21:13:56.5: 13.71 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.66 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:37:11.28 -21:13:56.5: ref_mag=13.66 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.6758 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:51:38.66 -25:11:34.1: 14.03 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:39:40.83 -21:50:45.9: 13.70 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:51:38.66 -25:11:34.1: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.2530 delta=0.79 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:50:05.52 -20:58:33.5: 13.53 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.77 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 21:07:28.83 -22:50:09.0: 14.25 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:39:40.83 -21:50:45.9: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.6374 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.53 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:50:05.52 -20:58:33.5: ref_mag=13.53 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.6946 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.18 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:07:28.83 -22:50:09.0: ref_mag=14.18 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.6567 delta=0.52 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:45:01.05 -25:36:13.3: 14.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:57:43.78 -22:15:01.7: 13.92 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:57:43.78 -22:15:01.7: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.6676 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:39:51.74 -24:18:23.6: 13.86 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 20:57:10.98 -22:25:12.9: 13.98 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 21:05:27.32 -24:06:37.7: 11.82 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:39:51.74 -24:18:23.6: 14.01 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 20:57:10.98 -22:25:12.9: 13.97 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.98 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.92 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:57:10.98 -22:25:12.9: ref_mag=13.98 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.7676 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:39:51.74 -24:18:23.6: ref_mag=13.92 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.5911 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-14_01-20-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 21:05:27.32 -24:06:37.7: 11.88 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.85 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 21:05:27.32 -24:06:37.7: ref_mag=11.85 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=10.8261 delta=1.02 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out29288.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53138.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53170.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53406.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53509.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52751_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 52751_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52761_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 52761_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52763_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 52763_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52842_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 52842_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52968_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 52968_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53006_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53006_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53064_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53064_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53138_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
Preparing report for the candidate 53138_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53170_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
Preparing report for the candidate 53170_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53261_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53261_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53275_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53275_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53280_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53280_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53292_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53292_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53296_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53296_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53300_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53300_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53307_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53307_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53313_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53313_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53314_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53314_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53325_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53325_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53329_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53329_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53332_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53332_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53337_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53337_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53343_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53343_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53345_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53345_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53363_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53363_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53367_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53367_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53383_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53383_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53384_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53384_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53403_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53403_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53404_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53404_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53406_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
Preparing report for the candidate 53406_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53409_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53409_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53413_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53413_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53417_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53417_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53423_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53423_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53425_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53425_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53426_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53426_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53427_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53427_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53428_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53428_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53429_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53429_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53433_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53433_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53437_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53437_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53445_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53445_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53446_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53446_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53447_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53447_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53450_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53450_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53453_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53453_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53457_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53457_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53461_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53461_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53463_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53463_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53465_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53465_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53480_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53480_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53497_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53497_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53509_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
Preparing report for the candidate 53509_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53513_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53513_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53515_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53515_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53518_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 53518_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01138_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 01138_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:57:15.99 -30:45:49.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28924_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 28924_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:07:36.60 -23:55:14.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02165_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 02165_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:37:23.34 -30:10:23.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29288_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
Preparing report for the candidate 29288_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09162_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 09162_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:54:26.46 -27:44:16.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03065_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 03065_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:26:43.94 -29:51:04.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28464_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161
The candidate 28464_fd_Cap-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-04_00-06-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0161 did not pass the final checks
